- Publisher: Atlus
- Release Date: Jun 24, 2008
User Score
Mixed or average reviews- based on 26 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 17 out of 26
-
Mixed: 2 out of 26
-
Negative: 7 out of 26
Buy Now
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
Aug 28, 2014No region free. 0 atlus...............................................................................................................................
-
WalterD.Jul 18, 2008It's got its faults, sure (horrible camera angle), but it IS a well written SRPG, of which the 360 has very few. Worth my $60.
-
-
ScottH.Jul 7, 2008In my 25 yrs of playing games this is the one game where the critics have completely missed the boat. The camera is only SLIGHTlY annoying and the graphics are poor but man this game is fun. Check the few critics at the top. They are bang on.
-
-
JoeT.Aug 20, 2008
-
-
HudsonM.Jun 10, 2008"The lousy last-gen graphics murder what compelling plot there is." lol, that's like saying the voice acting screwed up the camera.
-
-
SeanO.Jun 10, 2008yes the graphics aren't that great compared to other 360 games. as a strat RPG, it's pretty decent. plus, when have strat RPG's ever been about the visuals? takes a while to get into, but very addictive once you do. I will be buying this when it comes out.
-
-
MertA.Jun 23, 2008I played the demo, and it was a horrible disappointment. I am always looking for a good turn-based strategy game on the console, so I was sad that this game was so bad. Even if the graphics are forgivable, the infuriatingly bad camera, controls, and interface make the game unplayable. Do yourself a favor and go play Advance Wars, Culdcept Saga, or the new FF Tactics instead.
-
-
SergenteenApr 27, 2008I've just played the demo and I'm lovin it. Reminds me a lot of fire emblem. The game play and graphics aren't the best, put they are passable. The story line and time are great and it should be a good game. However, this will all depend on whether or not the actual storyline is good and how long the game is. P.S. I hear online co-op? That would be nice.
-
-
JohnC.Aug 7, 2008decent game, controls take getting used to. Not many offerings on the strat RPG front so this one gets a 9 just for taking a stab at it.
-
-
DrareKeerMar 14, 2009
-
-
toltec123Apr 2, 2009
-
-
LukeLJun 25, 2008
-
-
EricP.Jun 26, 2008Awful, graphics are PS-One at best, the concept is poorly implemented, the voice acting is laughable, the item system is stupid and the camera is completely broken. In the words of IGN, this is truly an Epic Failure.
-
-
Jul 5, 2014This game had a great premise, and I really wanted to like it, but it's just not good. The level's are tedious, and early in the game the difficulty curve shoots for the moon unless you're willing to sink hours into grinding levels. So sad, it could have been a dandy game.
-
Feb 7, 2020
-
Sep 25, 2022This review contains spoilers, click expand to view.
-
Mar 16, 2022
Awards & Rankings
-
The lousy last-gen graphics murder what compelling plot there is.
-
Electronic Gaming MonthlyIf you can handle inelegant controls, graphics, and story, and a text-heavy menu system, this might hold some appeal. Otherwise, avoid it like lycanthropy. [July 2008, p.81]
-
No quantity of vamires, werewolves, and undead zombies can salvage its dreadfully tedious gameplay. [July 2008, p.70]