Monster Jam

 Xbox 360
User Score
6.6

Mixed or average reviews- based on 9 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 5 out of 9
  2. Mixed: 1 out of 9
  3. Negative: 3 out of 9
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. MegWhiteley
    May 17, 2012
    2
    Again? Monster JAM is a big competence, great, funny and savage, but the games are a big disaster, and this new version of Monster JAM is not the exception. The gameplay is awful, the graphics are horrible, the monster cars look awful. Terrible game.
  2. OGALOTRANQUILAO
    Mar 4, 2019
    9
    gráficos meio ruins nada demais, controles caóticos não tão horríveis, jogo para diversão e desestressar,
    modos de jogo divertidos, cabendo até 4 jogadores na mesma tela.
  3. HaarisG
    Jul 22, 2020
    7
    This game was absolutely amazing to play as a child, which is exactly the target audience. People are giving it an incredibly hard time for being a casual arcade style game, rather strange imo. Good game!

Awards & Rankings

60
#60 Most Shared Xbox 360 Game of 2007

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
43

Generally unfavorable reviews - based on 9 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 0 out of 9
  2. Mixed: 4 out of 9
  3. Negative: 5 out of 9
  1. Official Xbox Magazine
    40
    Really, the biggest problem with Monster Jam is its price--for $20, we'd be all over it, but $50? Get over your bad self. [Mar 2008, p.92]
  2. Console Monster
    25
    Overall, Monster Jam brings nothing new to the genre. It feels like a direct port of the PlayStation 2 version with added achievements, and with the release of Race Driver: GRID at the same time, Monster Jam will never really get off the starting line.
    Read full review
  3. Xbox World 360 Magazine UK
    39
    A game without a reason to live, consigned to the scrapheap by the 360's real racers. [July 2008, p.83]
See all critic reviews »