Call of Duty: WWII

 PlayStation 4
User Score
5.1

Mixed or average reviews- based on 2065 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 718 out of 2065
  2. Mixed: 482 out of 2065
  3. Negative: 865 out of 2065
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. M1sfiT
    Sep 3, 2023
    5
    Gaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaamessss!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! cod ww2
  2. 34m2121
    Jul 21, 2023
    6
    Diğer CODlardan farklı olarak çok oyunu etkilemesede skill kullanabiliyoruz, ara sahnelerin kalitesi mükemmel, duygusal ama vasat bir hikaye. onun dışında sıradan bir COD
  3. gaset04
    Jun 20, 2023
    7
    I enjoyed playing this game. WWII is so realistic (atmosphere and graphics), it's like you are going to the war for die. The plot it's not the best perhaps it is plain. I should put more missions but each mission last less because it's veeerryy looong. The online flag. Nevertheless, zombies mode is pretty good. I put 7 out of 10. Personally, it's not bad but it's still well
  4. miguellopez99
    Jun 1, 2023
    7
    71/100 .
  5. KrowKrof
    May 13, 2023
    6
    ........................................................................mid
  6. bramchvh
    Feb 10, 2023
    7
    This is a strange game. It is a Call of Duty that tries a lot differently which is respectable but a lot of it falls flat. The campaign is beautiful and is pretty fun with a couple of changes but nothing big but the zombies is something completely different. It is still the round based system but tries to scare you a lot more than the other zombies games. Unfortunately it isnt scary atThis is a strange game. It is a Call of Duty that tries a lot differently which is respectable but a lot of it falls flat. The campaign is beautiful and is pretty fun with a couple of changes but nothing big but the zombies is something completely different. It is still the round based system but tries to scare you a lot more than the other zombies games. Unfortunately it isnt scary at all. The multiplayer is really nothing to comment on.… Expand
  7. storygamer
    Jan 17, 2023
    7
    Call Of Duty: WWII is one of the last innovative and good COD games, after the franchise became a repetitive evergreen. While the multiplayer is strong as usual, the single player campaign is a bit short, but well written. But the most impressive aspect is the atmosphere. You dive deep into emotional WWII moments and experience rotatory slow and fast scenes. A good historical FPS!
  8. goodgriff33
    Dec 24, 2022
    7
    Answer: 75 characters is between 10 words and 19 words with spaces included in the character count. If spaces are not included in the character count, then 75 characters is between 12 words and 25 words.
  9. Epicmonster5600
    Dec 6, 2022
    5
    It is quite literally the most forgettable cod game I've ever played but the "lootbox" system was different I suppose
  10. trinovatic
    Nov 27, 2022
    7
    El COD más infravalorado en mi opinión, esta bueno, la campaña me gustó y la ambientación que hay en el modo zombies también.
  11. SauceBox6
    Nov 26, 2022
    6
    10 - Masterpiece
    9 - Amazing
    8 - Great
    7 - Good
    6 - Okay
    5 - Mediocre
    4 - Bad
    3 - Awful
    2 - Painful
    1 - Unbearable
  12. uoKAOS
    Oct 20, 2022
    7
    This one is truly awesome to play! Graphics are well made! Snipers and throwing knives are very enjoyable and pleasant to play with! Great one for once!
  13. YokoHugo
    Jul 28, 2022
    5
    Kbkhihigkgigkgigigjgjgjgjgjgjgjgjgjggjgjjfjggjgjgjjgjgfjjfjfjufufjfjgjgjgugugugutugigjgjgjgjggjggjgjgjfug888888888888888888888
  14. geo333
    Jun 25, 2022
    7
    This game would have gotten a better score by me if it was not for the glitches in the campaign some of them just are soo bad considering I played this game 5 years later after its release, it should have been fixed aside from it, the campaign is fantastic and the multiplayer great as well, if you like ww2 stuff this is a gem, great game.
  15. samtimes89
    May 29, 2022
    6
    Ps4 te bitirdim Pc'de oynamak istedim sanırım bir kere oynasam yeter bir daha sarmadı
  16. dan457347
    Mar 14, 2022
    5
    good game good game but i hate when i have to like pay playstation plus just to play multiplayer and zombie mode i mean like why i just wanna play those cool modes
  17. chernandez31
    Feb 23, 2022
    5
    Mediocre in every aspect imaginable. A huge letdown back in 2017. Nothing but pain.
  18. lesiuML
    Feb 20, 2022
    7
    Very solid story. Although really not emotional one... Lot of things were very safe for example deaths camps. There were few really great stealth mission ant few really memorable moments. It's seriously good game that shows how ww2 game could be interesting, exciting and varied. I must admit that soud design in campaign is great. The sound of guns and scream of soldiers are really deep andVery solid story. Although really not emotional one... Lot of things were very safe for example deaths camps. There were few really great stealth mission ant few really memorable moments. It's seriously good game that shows how ww2 game could be interesting, exciting and varied. I must admit that soud design in campaign is great. The sound of guns and scream of soldiers are really deep and realistic. Despite the fact that this game is not really historical correct and it's lack of maturity moments it is really a good game.… Expand
  19. mboscht
    Feb 20, 2022
    6
    Call of Duty: WWII .
  20. FRIST_008
    Jan 2, 2022
    7
    + Очень ленивый код с обычной стрельбой. Отсутствием хоть чего-то, что может тебя развлекать и сюжетными провалами уровня facepalm. Это тот самый момент когда бателфилд 1 лучше не в стрельбе, а лучше во всем.
    - стрельба на 8
    - сюжет 7 - красивый Голливуд 8 - другой геймплей 7 Итого 7.5    + Очень ленивый код с обычной стрельбой. Отсутствием хоть чего-то, что может тебя развлекать и сюжетными провалами уровня facepalm. Это тот самый момент когда бателфилд 1 лучше не в стрельбе, а лучше во всем.
    - стрельба на 8
    - сюжет 7
    - красивый Голливуд 8
    - другой геймплей 7
    Итого 7.5
  21. Dan9el99
    Dec 27, 2021
    5
    Mittelmäßiger Ego Shooter, dessen Online Modus ganz in Ordnung ist und gut läuft. Die Handlung der Kampagne ist aber sehr oberflächlich und bleibt weit unterdurchschnittlich. Insgesamt enttäuschend (5/10).
  22. renatoelyone
    Jun 7, 2021
    6
    campaign for this game is dull and full of cliche, pre-assembled action scenes that do not surprise anyone the characters do not have much charisma. Multiplayer and a big payout to win almost every weapon you unlock only if you get the premium version and the matches are quite long. The multiplayer maps are huge filled with useless empty spaces that could reduce a lot. The difficulty curvecampaign for this game is dull and full of cliche, pre-assembled action scenes that do not surprise anyone the characters do not have much charisma. Multiplayer and a big payout to win almost every weapon you unlock only if you get the premium version and the matches are quite long. The multiplayer maps are huge filled with useless empty spaces that could reduce a lot. The difficulty curve is ridiculously bad, meaning you have to play a lot even if you want to have some fun in this game. One of the few positive points of this game is the destruction of scenarios. This game is not recommended for beginners… Expand
  23. BrayanOchoa
    Apr 26, 2021
    7
    Campaña meh
    no me gusto la campaña muy aburrido sin emociones y muertes Zzzzzzz A mi me encanto la saga de ps2 y world at war 1
    Pero este ww2 es una mamada esperaba algun evento emotivo y llorar para decir este juego es demasidado pero no,me ponen una historia que esta de la vrga.
  24. marvsfontanilla
    Mar 31, 2021
    6
    Story: 6
    Graphics: 9
    Sound: 6
    Gameplay: 5
    Game Time: 6 Hours (Main Story) + Online MP
    Duration: 5-6 Hours (Campaign) + MP
  25. LesandroBonucci
    Mar 29, 2021
    5
    mediocre
    mediocre

    Graphics - 7/10
    Gameplay - 5/10
    Story - 5/10
    Sound - 6/10
  26. SleepNot
    Mar 7, 2021
    7
    Call of duty WW2 is a good game. It’s good action without drama and soul :) Good to kill but not very interesting
  27. Matthewrhodes
    Feb 1, 2021
    5
    Looking back at this game it was alright. The campaign was decent but it's very short. The multiplayer is garbage with the maps being a big reason why but what makes this game decent is the amazing zombies
  28. adam_carl
    Jan 27, 2021
    7
    I never enjoyed such a good story like in this game with bombastic graphics but in other way the gameplay bugs and such a lame shooting actions...
  29. michealmyles
    Jan 20, 2021
    6
    The single player campaign is good. Multiplayer is sub-par, the maps are far too small. The loot box system is abhorrent - but so are the times. Until a new generation of developers arise, this will continue. Everything after MW2 was a downhill, but this game is different. Its good enough - for me. If you want a better WW2 game I recommend Medal of Honor: Allied Assault and Call Of Duty:The single player campaign is good. Multiplayer is sub-par, the maps are far too small. The loot box system is abhorrent - but so are the times. Until a new generation of developers arise, this will continue. Everything after MW2 was a downhill, but this game is different. Its good enough - for me. If you want a better WW2 game I recommend Medal of Honor: Allied Assault and Call Of Duty: World At War. You wont be playing much multiplayer with that, but the engine is more true to the standards of what a good shooter is, responsive controls, nice textures, etc. If I were to recommend this game, I wouldn't say its worth more than $20. The grind of the multiplayer loot box mechanic is a gambling trap that you should be wise not to fall into. Collecting just for the sake having a skin or texture forces you to play the game in a way that is streamlined and that is deceitful and misguided. Its understandable that there should be unlockable skins, etc, but the randomization is explicit gambling, which I don't think should be in games, unless you like that sort of thing - more power to you. If you can take anything away from this review - please note the developer and publishers to avoid: EA, Activision, Ubisoft. They are game manufacturers with a quota. Never forget that. Its big business. DONT TRUST THE "CRIT" REVIEWS. The only thing critical about them is their bias.… Expand
  30. Sr_PuXiToPuiG
    Jan 3, 2021
    7
    Piola. . .
  31. FrpMan
    Dec 19, 2020
    7
    Single player olarak kısa olmuş. Ayrıca bölüm bölüm olması biraz olayı bozmuş. O eski Call of tadını alamadım.
  32. Markos-
    Nov 27, 2020
    6
    I was never a big fan of CODs but this one caught my attention because of the WW2 setting. Well, it was also given for free in PS Plus so that might have something to do, too.
    I played a third of the campaign. At first, I thought it was awesome, the graphics are great in cinematics, there seemed to be a gripping story and I thought I would really feel immersed.
    However, after 2-3    I was never a big fan of CODs but this one caught my attention because of the WW2 setting. Well, it was also given for free in PS Plus so that might have something to do, too.
    I played a third of the campaign. At first, I thought it was awesome, the graphics are great in cinematics, there seemed to be a gripping story and I thought I would really feel immersed.
    However, after 2-3 missions, i started to clearly see 'I've been here before' all over the place. The action is always pushed to the limit with explosions etc, and it's always the same old 'clear the enemies - move to next checkpoint' that we know so well from ALL these games. I just lost immersion and stopped caring completely on the action, I realized the characters were also very empty and I didn't even know who was who (not that it mattered anyway). Great envelope (graphics, presentation, music), but a very empty core (feeling, engagement, uniqueness).
    The multiplayer , I lasted 30 minutes. It's just too fast and chaotic, and you need to train a lot to get competitive. I don't see the point on playing unless its with friends.    … Expand
  33. Elite_Soldier
    Nov 21, 2020
    5
    I'm just writing at least 150 characters because I wanted to save this review in a more convenient way to look back at scores that I had given stuff as a user
  34. Berik
    Nov 14, 2020
    6
    Released in 2017, this game goes back to WWII to provide a Michael Bay take on the allied Invasion of Europe. Story: Pretentious, historically inaccurate and all written with knowledge of what happens after in mind. Actual soldiers weren't this foolishly brave, nor did they have any illusion about 'becoming heroes.' The game sets up moments that are clearly straight up stolen from moviesReleased in 2017, this game goes back to WWII to provide a Michael Bay take on the allied Invasion of Europe. Story: Pretentious, historically inaccurate and all written with knowledge of what happens after in mind. Actual soldiers weren't this foolishly brave, nor did they have any illusion about 'becoming heroes.' The game sets up moments that are clearly straight up stolen from movies like Saving Private Ryan, but then follows it up by dozens of allied soldiers just running into the fire of the enemy... What the **** ??

    However, after the liberation of Paris the darker tone of the story starts to set in as the war becomes more vicious in German territory. I was enjoying this part of the story much more.

    Gameplay:
    The shooting mechanics are actually very good. The practical WWII weapons provide a much more intimate fighting style, as battles are fought in narrow fields or streets. The reaction of hitting and eliminating an enemy feels very satisfying, and the results are quite gory. There are obligatory quick-time events, though these do show intense fights to the death that get you on the edge of your seat. There is a particular mission where you you operate a Sherman tank that fights a Panzer and a Tiger Tank. Though this is very simplified (and a Sherman tank is no match for a Tiger II Tank) it is quite entertaining! I find the single player campaign of WWII to be very enjoyable due to the satisfying gameplay and darker missions later on. Had this been the only content of WWII for 20 bucks i could have given it a 7/10. Graphics:
    It's a pretty game, no doubt about that. The cinematics are especially stunning to look at, and i like the inclusion of gory effects by explosives.

    Multiplayer:
    Chickens running around with no head gameplay, that lacks all the satisfaction that is present in the single player campaign. There are some fun modes that change up the gameplay, but Team Deathmatch and the basic modes are poorly put together pools of mud.

    Zombies:
    Quite fun, but i feel like it is overstuffed and overcomplicated. A zombies mode like in World at War with a bunch of new small maps would have been enough.

    Though the game reeks of inspiration out of movies instead of books, i find the single player campaign to be great. Unfortunately i can't say the same about the rest of the game, as it seems to lack polish and effort. I give the game a 6/10.    … Expand
  35. Gaz
    Nov 12, 2020
    7
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I'm going to be as fair and balanced as I possibly can with this game. It's completely average in just about every way. Honestly, this is the video game equivalent of a failing student getting a C- minus and the teachers all say how good he is. The bar was set so low that it looks good by comparison.

    The campaign was something I found enjoyable, but suffers from archaic design choices. It felt like I was playing Call of Duty 2 or 3, and while I enjoyed some of the nostalgia and simplicity of it all, I was constantly reminding myself that this was a 2017 release that cost millions of dollars to make and promised a return to form while pushing boundaries, and the game failed to deliver in that regard. Worse still, where the game goes over-the-top with it are the most immersion-breaking parts of the story. There's seriously a scene where you sneak into a Nazi camp with suppressed SMG's ( the stealth sequences are terrible, by the way) and later in that same level, you chase a train and flip your vehicle sideways in front of it and end up grinding against the train before it eventually derails and you fly out of your jeep. A lot of the game doesn't feel like WWII and instead feels like a weird pseudo-WWII. Honestly, the only way I got through it and found myself having fun was by acting like it was Inglorious Basterds The Game. Seriously guys, take this campaign with a grain of salt and try to treat it like a war movie and just enjoy the ride because if you're looking for a realistic or immersive experience, you won't find it here. It's a good campaign, but only if you appreciate it with the right mindset. If you're like me and you loved World at War, this game's campaign won't be dethroning it.

    Multiplayer made me keep reminding myself that, once again, this was a multi-million dollar franchise because the multiplayer is about as basic as it gets. You get all the modes that come in traditional CoD fare with a few additions like the War mode which really just boils down to, "Defenders camp and attackers shove their bodies into objectives and ruin their K/D." But the maps are basic, bland, and uninspired and the weapon selection is mostly acceptable at best. Again, this multiplayer is easily 10x better than Infinite Warfare's, but that's barely saying anything. I truly felt like I was playing a lesser shooter made by a smaller developer instead of a powerhouse franchise. It's pitiful, actually.

    The zombies, however, is something I enjoy for the most part. It's familiar enough to draw me in, yet different enough to feel unique. The map is huge, the zombies have different movement patterns than the other CoD games, there's different zombie types, and catalogued objectives that guide you on a path. I feel like this game gives you the tools to last longer and it feels like the devs want you to survive and see it through if you can figure out what you're doing. There's a story there, and it peaks your interest.

    But one of the areas this game stumbles in is the accuracy department. Suppressed weapons, manually reloading M1 Garands, red dot sights, incendiary bullets, and NO FREAKING SWASTIKAS in multiplayer really hold this game back. Because Nazi zombies with a bunch of iron crosses draped on everything doesn't look anywhere near as sinister as it should. In fact, just to mock the absurdity of this game's political correctness, my multiplayer soldier is a black woman who's calling card is Normandy beach with a gay pride flag raised on it. Seriously. These are things Sledgehammer put in their game about WWII, folks. And speaking of things put in the game, the microtransactions and the season pass are back and just as prevalent as ever, and given the fact that Activision recently patented methods to shove them down our throats even more, it seems that they're going to be content to alienate their fans and bleed whoever's left dry until the cash cow can't be milked any further.

    At the end of the day, Call of Duty WWII is strictly average in every way. It's by no means a terrible game, but it never comes close to greatness, either. This will be a game relegated to the dead center of every CoD ranking list, and that's where it belongs. If you need to wash the taste of Infinite Warfare out of your mouth and want that CoD experience you can't get elsewhere, this game is for you. As for me, this is a game I'd buy on sale for about 20 bucks because that's all I feel it's worth. But if you're looking for historical shooters, Battlefield 1 is a much better game and there are plenty of other first-person shooters on the market that outclass this one. Like I said, it's a C- grade from a failing student. It's good compared to its last few outings alone, and that's not saying much.    … Expand
  36. Aykarg
    Oct 10, 2020
    7
    I got it from PS Plus. Entertaining campaign. Good graphics and robust gameplay.
  37. killerwhalom2
    Sep 13, 2020
    7
    Personally I think this game gets to much hate, the multiplayer is very fun and fast paced unlike the newer games, and the campaign is amazing.
  38. OgiMaestro223
    Sep 13, 2020
    5
    while not bad or horrible game its just big disappointment
    when i saw trailers i was like omg new cod in world war 2
    and it got realeased i was like this is most inticipated game of this year
    campaing is big fat meh
    multplayer awfull
    and even zombies were ruined
  39. KenViewXD77
    Sep 9, 2020
    5
    The Campaign was good enough, but does not ave any replay value to it. The Multiplayer was decent, however, the servers often goes down and kicks you out in the middle of the game. Zombies Mode is not as good as previous games (Black Ops 1, World at War). And of course, Supply Box are the most pathetic thing ever
  40. iKen
    Sep 1, 2020
    7
    Played on PS4 Pro.
    Gameplay: GOOD
    Graphic: GREAT
    Story: GOOD
    Music/Sound : GOOD
    Dialogue/Voice Acting: GREAT
  41. tariq_almandhar
    Aug 16, 2020
    7
    من ناحية القصة فالأمر كان من الممكن أن يكون بشكل أفضل فالقصة مقبولة وأسلوب اللعب تنقصه بعض الأمور لكنه جيد والمهمات بها تنوع ممتاز وتنوعت بيئات اللعب والمطلوب منك كذلك في المهمات من قنص أو تمدير طائرات أو دبابات أو حماية حلفاء ومناطق وتحرير مناطقمن ناحية القصة فالأمر كان من الممكن أن يكون بشكل أفضل فالقصة مقبولة وأسلوب اللعب تنقصه بعض الأمور لكنه جيد والمهمات بها تنوع ممتاز وتنوعت بيئات اللعب والمطلوب منك كذلك في المهمات من قنص أو تمدير طائرات أو دبابات أو حماية حلفاء ومناطق وتحرير مناطق
  42. RusFlexMen
    Aug 10, 2020
    5
    Сюжет до абсурда патриотично-американский, не несет в себе никаких посылов, которым научила всех Вторая Мировая Война, нет участника войны, который сделал большинство действий для победы в этой самой войне и который потерял большее количество солдат - СССР ещё он ОЧЕНЬ короткий. Чуть больше полтора баллов в моей оценке занимает сюжет. А что на счёт сетевого режима, то он тоже получился неСюжет до абсурда патриотично-американский, не несет в себе никаких посылов, которым научила всех Вторая Мировая Война, нет участника войны, который сделал большинство действий для победы в этой самой войне и который потерял большее количество солдат - СССР ещё он ОЧЕНЬ короткий. Чуть больше полтора баллов в моей оценке занимает сюжет. А что на счёт сетевого режима, то он тоже получился не очень хорошим, но отыгрывается своим разнообразием режимов, карт и оружия, но и кастомизация конечно же. Все остальные баллы я отдаю сетевому режиму. И я забыл главное... это графика, сама по себе она ну достаточно хорошая, но разрешение текстур особенно разочаровывает, одним словом - мыло. (language - Russian)… Expand
  43. kylocosplay
    Jul 29, 2020
    7
    Le he puesto un 7 porque la campaña me pareció espectacular, el nivel de gráficos está a nivel del the last of us 2 y las interpretaciones son muy buenas, la campaña te lleva a batallas muy importantes de la SGM como el desembarco de Normandía, la jugabilidad innova como curar mediante botiquines que te lo dan los compañeros o por el mapa, actos heroicos ya sean arrastrar a un soldadoLe he puesto un 7 porque la campaña me pareció espectacular, el nivel de gráficos está a nivel del the last of us 2 y las interpretaciones son muy buenas, la campaña te lleva a batallas muy importantes de la SGM como el desembarco de Normandía, la jugabilidad innova como curar mediante botiquines que te lo dan los compañeros o por el mapa, actos heroicos ya sean arrastrar a un soldado herido para llevarlo a cubierto o salvarlo de un aprieto. Los zombis no están nada mal y el multijugador está muy bien hecho con una lobby donde coger misiones, abrir paquetes de ayuda, duelos 1 vs 1...
    Conclusión, a mi me ha encantado y gracias a PSPlus que lo regalaron lo he podido jugar, el único defecto que tiene el juego es que en mi PS4 PRO los ventiladores se ponen al máximo que incluso a veces me salía el mensaje de sobrecalentamiento, por lo demás todo está muy bien.    … Expand
  44. Sammyboo21
    Jul 28, 2020
    7
    Although it’s not a great game it’s still a solid if predictable tribute to all those who served.
  45. PictoPirate
    Jul 27, 2020
    7
    Call of Duty: WWII is exactly what you'd expect from a Call of Duty game. Big production values, bombastic set-pieces and all the shooty shooting you can stomach.

    The combat is as good as ever, the weapons feel meaty and satisfying and there is a decent amount of variety in weapons to keep things interesting. The graphics are good, as you'd expect from a CoD game. The story is decent    Call of Duty: WWII is exactly what you'd expect from a Call of Duty game. Big production values, bombastic set-pieces and all the shooty shooting you can stomach.

    The combat is as good as ever, the weapons feel meaty and satisfying and there is a decent amount of variety in weapons to keep things interesting. The graphics are good, as you'd expect from a CoD game.

    The story is decent and brilliantly acted, if a little one dimensional and lacking in any really interesting twists and turns. So, yeah... it's a call of Duty game where you get to shoot Nazis. Nothing groundbreaking but a fun romp while it lasts.

    *I don't care about multiplayer so I can't tell you if that is any good or not.    … Expand
  46. BjarniboyNR2
    Jul 20, 2020
    7
    The story is decent and the gameplay as well, but it's just more of the same old, same old.
  47. Wolf359
    Jul 10, 2020
    7
    O multiplayer tradicional deste COD é o mais fraco, entretanto, o Modo Zombies é excelente e a campanha não deixa a peteca cair. No frigir dos ovos é um bom game, e graficamente muito lindo. As mecanicas de solicitação de pacotes de vida, de munição, de bombas e sinalizadores é muito boa também. Por fim, é um game legal com um ou outro momento de destaque na campanha, não é um Call of DutyO multiplayer tradicional deste COD é o mais fraco, entretanto, o Modo Zombies é excelente e a campanha não deixa a peteca cair. No frigir dos ovos é um bom game, e graficamente muito lindo. As mecanicas de solicitação de pacotes de vida, de munição, de bombas e sinalizadores é muito boa também. Por fim, é um game legal com um ou outro momento de destaque na campanha, não é um Call of Duty no nível de Modern Warfare (o original de PS3) nem de um Black Ops, mas traz muita coisa interessante, e serve como um throwback aos CODs de PS2/XBOX/GC que eram ambientados na Segunda Guerra.… Expand
  48. teddymikki
    Jul 9, 2020
    5
    Got it from PS Plus. Never ever finished it. Gameplay is boring as hell and feels like a remastered Call of Duty 2 from the early 2000. Which is not a bad thing, if the game was published at least 10 years ago. The stealth missions are a disgrace. Nothing like from CoD4. Plot is chaotic as well. And I am so tired that Americans won everything and not only in WW2. Pathetic.
  49. Datojet
    Jul 1, 2020
    7
    Just finished this game after I got it through my PS+ subscription.
    I don`t know why COD WW2 took so much heat from the audience, but I had a great time while playing it.
    The graphics are decent, the plot is very simple yet manages to keep one entertained, the campaign length is enough for 5-6 eves of intensive gameplay. What else do ya`ll want from a shooter? You run and you shoot, as    Just finished this game after I got it through my PS+ subscription.
    I don`t know why COD WW2 took so much heat from the audience, but I had a great time while playing it.
    The graphics are decent, the plot is very simple yet manages to keep one entertained, the campaign length is enough for 5-6 eves of intensive gameplay. What else do ya`ll want from a shooter? You run and you shoot, as simple as that. Yes, the dialogues in this game are dull and full of washed out cliches, but it`s not a first FPS to abuse that and definitely not the last. COD WW2 also has a number of gameplay shortcomings that get quite annoying after several hours of playing, like indistructible tables or other seemingly fragile objects that absorb RPG shots and leave enemies untouched, or crazy damage the nazis do on high level of difficulty resulting in frequent one-shots. Also, the friendly NPC`s are often annoying as they constantly run in front of you making it more difficult to aim at the enemies.
    But generally, I liked the dynamics of the game, I loved the missions where you operate a tank or a plane, the shooting itself feels pretty good, and the whole COD WW2 just feels like a solid game to spend a few eves with.    … Expand
  50. Fana-du-jeu
    Jun 27, 2020
    6
    Plutôt un bon jeu , il manque un peu de contenu , mais il fait très bien l'affaire pour une partie entre amis ,les loot box pour débloquer certaines armes sont un peu abusé il faut bien l'admettre ( déjà que le nombres d'armes n'est pas conséquent) donc je peut tout a fait comprendre la note final, bien que je soit satisfait du jeu
  51. PaektusanLeader
    Jun 24, 2020
    7
    It is certainly better than all the other CoDs in recent years, but it still doesn't hold up with the original CoDs that took place during WW2.
  52. 613th
    Jun 22, 2020
    5
    In general this is a typical Call of Duty in all senses - from campaign to multiplayer.

    Single player - very simple story with obvious characters, storylane and levels. The graphics in a whole game is terrible ( maybe just on PS4), but cinematic videos in this part of game are impressive enough. If i saw only them, i would think of byiung this game earlier. Multiplayer - standart for    In general this is a typical Call of Duty in all senses - from campaign to multiplayer.

    Single player - very simple story with obvious characters, storylane and levels. The graphics in a whole game is terrible ( maybe just on PS4), but cinematic videos in this part of game are impressive enough. If i saw only them, i would think of byiung this game earlier.

    Multiplayer - standart for CoD, just in WWII setting. It is interesting and exciting sometimes to play it, but not for a long time. Also there are too much cosmetic in it. Classic Activision and classic (boring) CoD.    … Expand
  53. ToshLichev
    Jun 21, 2020
    6
    An absolutely average game to the core. An instantly forgettable main campaign that takes us through D-Day...and a bunch of boring events after it, towards the end of WW2. The actual gameplay works well and the graphics are quite impressive at times, however the utter mediocrity that surrounds it makes the game boring, specially if u play it for more than an hour at a time. The multiplayerAn absolutely average game to the core. An instantly forgettable main campaign that takes us through D-Day...and a bunch of boring events after it, towards the end of WW2. The actual gameplay works well and the graphics are quite impressive at times, however the utter mediocrity that surrounds it makes the game boring, specially if u play it for more than an hour at a time. The multiplayer is ok for me, but I barely play multiplayer in general.… Expand
  54. Leandro5an
    Jun 20, 2020
    7
    Hace años que no jugaba un Call of Duty. Me gustó la campaña pero nunca tanto para ponerle una nota verde. En el online no sé para qué pone en franco tiradores si los mapas son super chicos (pequeños).
  55. Jonasluas
    Jun 20, 2020
    7
    Un juego muy clásico de activition buen juego buena historia graficos y tema de la segunda guerra mundial misiones entretenidas y buen desarrollo mecanicas de siempre algo para jugar un dia aburrido o una campara juego muy caotico y clasico de los call of duty
  56. AbhinavDasiga
    Jun 20, 2020
    6
    *Single Player Campaign Only* Sledgehammer's attempt at a gritty shooter set in World War 2 Europe had great promise. Unfortunately as things progressed through the campaign story, it devolved into your standard America is good narrative. The protagonists history with his brother and friends is never brought out as an arc but rather some throw away aspects in the script. Shooting mechanics*Single Player Campaign Only* Sledgehammer's attempt at a gritty shooter set in World War 2 Europe had great promise. Unfortunately as things progressed through the campaign story, it devolved into your standard America is good narrative. The protagonists history with his brother and friends is never brought out as an arc but rather some throw away aspects in the script. Shooting mechanics are just about fine. Overall it's a decent playthrough but no more.… Expand
  57. arostislavna
    Jun 19, 2020
    6
    This game is inauthentic for a WWII experience, which is a shame because Activision is banking on success since the last 4 lackluster games.

    The Campaign is average, arcade-y, and in part feels like a remastered Medal of Honor: Underground. Multiplayer is pretty much exactly the same as every game before it. I will give praise to Nazi Zombies, being able to unlock and choose    This game is inauthentic for a WWII experience, which is a shame because Activision is banking on success since the last 4 lackluster games.

    The Campaign is average, arcade-y, and in part feels like a remastered Medal of Honor: Underground.

    Multiplayer is pretty much exactly the same as every game before it.

    I will give praise to Nazi Zombies, being able to unlock and choose characters is fantastic.    … Expand
  58. FreedomFighters
    Jun 14, 2020
    5
    Here’s a game I never expected that I’d be writing a review of. I’ve played a few of the “Call of Duty” games before, but I’d say I have a weird history with this franchise. My friends and I have spent numerous hours playing several “Call of Duty” games (notably the “Black Ops” sub-series) in local multiplayer (mostly through fighting bots and taking on Zombies), and I’ve had some funHere’s a game I never expected that I’d be writing a review of. I’ve played a few of the “Call of Duty” games before, but I’d say I have a weird history with this franchise. My friends and I have spent numerous hours playing several “Call of Duty” games (notably the “Black Ops” sub-series) in local multiplayer (mostly through fighting bots and taking on Zombies), and I’ve had some fun playing those games, since I enjoy some local cooperative multiplayer with friends, but “Call of Duty” is in a weird boat where I feel it's simultaneously the most underrated and overrated game franchise out now. Underrated in that the games are relatively fun in short bursts, and perhaps not as bad as the internet might lead you to believe, but overrated in that they aren’t nearly as good as their blockbuster sales might lead you to believe. “Call of Duty” is not one of the greatest franchises in gaming, it’s simply one of the most persistent, as it continues to receive yearly installments that sell like hotcakes in spite of their general averageness. And while 2017’s “Call of Duty: WWII” was a hyped entry when it was announced for returning to the boots-on-ground gameplay style after so many futuristic entries, this entry honestly epitomizes the “averageness” that has rendered the series unexciting.
    “Call of Duty: WWII,” presentation-wise, does things pretty solidly: of course, the game is graphically impressive, just as any number of Activision games are, and gameplay-wise, it's at the very least functional. It’s fast-paced, the controls are fluid, and the gunplay is competent stuff. Beyond the campaign, this is another “Call of Duty” game that I’ve played with friends (as I mentioned, mostly against bots because that’s what we like), and it is occasionally pretty fun. This is a very minor thing, but I never got to mention this when I reviewed “Battlefield 1,” which I’m using just for the sake of comparison, but one thing I found so fun in that game was being able to use a shovel as a weapon, just because it was so jarring yet gratifying. “Call of Duty: WWII” does also allow you to use a shovel, which…I’m sorry, I know it’s really minor, but I just get a kick out of it.
    The reason I had to mention something that minor, though, is because I'm really reaching to find something positive to say about this game. I had some big issues with it, but the biggest, most glaring one is this: if you've played one “Call of Duty” game, you’ve played them all, and this entry hits that nail on the head. There’s nothing exciting about the gameplay here, it’s competently made but severely lacking in anything that captivating. Beyond the lack of standout gameplay elements (well, outside of vehicle sections that stand out for the WORST reasons), the campaign is unbelievably short and painfully unfulfilling. Much of the story is a mishmash of clichés with forgettable characters, and the game is so cinematic that it feels like most of the game’s length is spent watching. I know I mentioned in my review of “Battlefield 1” that it too had a campaign that felt short and occasionally had too much watching, but “Call of Duty: WWII” takes those flaws and turns them up to eleven. And the difference here is that “Battlefield 1” actually had a good game to go along with it, but with “Call of Duty: WWII,” I mean, I just beat the remaster of “Modern Warfare 2” about a month ago and I feel like I’m playing that exact same game here. By the way, I know I’m hanging around the “Battlefield 1” comparison a lot in this review, and I don’t want this to feel like a compare-and-contrast piece because a game should be judged on its own, but frankly, I feel the comparison is worth bringing up because I refuse to believe that “Call of Duty: WWII” would exist had the fanbase not caused such a stink about “Infinite Warfare” a year prior, and then EA not hit it so big with the announcement and trailer for “Battlefield 1” not long after. This game feels like it was conceptualized and created only to ride on the coattails of “Battlefield 1,” and frankly, to me, it often just feels like a rip-off of it.
    I really have to hand it to the “Call of Duty” series, because it is just extremely good at diluting and watering down the entire FPS genre for the biggest audience possible, most specifically casual gamers who don’t play enough video games to understand why the franchise is not nearly on the level of creativity as the many games it finds itself so eager to copy off of And that is precisely the case with “Call of Duty: WWII,” which has its moments of fun, but continues to carry a “been there, done that” vibe. It’s the same game you’ve played for years, and it remains a very safe, stale, lowest common denominator shooter that I can’t help but feel simply indifferent towards.
    Final rating: 5 out of 10 “Hmm…”    … Expand
  59. Flashyboy89
    Jun 12, 2020
    7
    From a Campaign point of view, Sledgehammer Games did a good job with Call of Duty: WWII. I haven’t played Online so, this score is for the Campaign only.
  60. flaviojcm
    Jun 12, 2020
    5
    dialogues and scenarios well created but repetitive game with low suitability for battles in war
  61. alexslork
    Jun 12, 2020
    5
    Why the press is giving 85 to this crap? You irresponsible liars! You're lying to the poor people to buy this garbage. Once again we have the cruel politics who want to take all your money. All this practices are going to end the console industry. Did you see the boxes falling from the sky?
  62. svonton
    Jun 5, 2020
    7
    common pew pew from Activision but in this time they back again to WW2 setting. saw a lot negative review about MP and loot boxes but i play only single player and will tell you my experience. and so what i can say if you have some thing like 6hours of free time and wanna shoot some bad nazis this game is definitely you will like. during the story, that represents mission set about mostcommon pew pew from Activision but in this time they back again to WW2 setting. saw a lot negative review about MP and loot boxes but i play only single player and will tell you my experience. and so what i can say if you have some thing like 6hours of free time and wanna shoot some bad nazis this game is definitely you will like. during the story, that represents mission set about most famous WW2 operations, you will not only shorting like regular infantryman but will able to control some vehicle like tanks and planes (and it was kinda fun). what about plot - story about soldiers that don't forget be a real humans during execution of an order, support each other as long as they can - it interest but not so much to worry about the characters, i think it completely "OK". yeah game have some bugs (one of them that when during one mission my weapon completely gone but still able to kill enemy by my sight =D) and questions (like why half of nazi use soviet PPSh-41 but lets leave it on the conscience of developers =D). in conclusion if u wanna some pew pew in WW2 setting you will get =D… Expand
  63. CoreGamer1408
    Jun 3, 2020
    5
    Dropped on PS+ for free and gave it ago. Nice visuals lots of cinematic action and cut scenes. You know the usual scripted CoD formula story telling and gameplay. Not into PvP MP shooters so the SP campaign is the only thing I do in CoD games. Period World War shooters have been done to death. Modern Military shooters have been done to death. Personally I preferred the out of this worldDropped on PS+ for free and gave it ago. Nice visuals lots of cinematic action and cut scenes. You know the usual scripted CoD formula story telling and gameplay. Not into PvP MP shooters so the SP campaign is the only thing I do in CoD games. Period World War shooters have been done to death. Modern Military shooters have been done to death. Personally I preferred the out of this world CoD like Infinite Warfare the most. Glad Call of Cliche was free of sorts. I was bored and out by the third level.… Expand
  64. alexandrumna
    May 11, 2020
    7
    I was really excited about the story having heard it will return to WW II , but aside from the amazing graphics and good gameplay and a nice story, you could tell they really didn't put much effort into it as it feels a little rushed. Don't really care about zombies to be honest. And the multiplayes is like any othe CoD game, pretty boring for me.
  65. Relah
    May 1, 2020
    6
    The singleplayer is, like any cod game, a simple action movie. The multiplayer is standard with a lot of maps that go into 3 lanes, zombies are amazing, yes the map is bigger and there are objectives but its super fun to play if you have friends over. Overall its a standard cod game, if you get it you will have a lot of fin with it.
  66. GGNEBYDET
    Mar 27, 2020
    5
    I think Activision are going to make a very good game,but I forgot,that Activision-lazy company.....
  67. sergio123456
    Feb 19, 2020
    7
    El juego cumple con lo que se espera de un Call Of Duty, es la vuelta a los orígenes, se hace demasiado corta la campaña.
  68. BradMorgan
    Sep 10, 2019
    6
    This game was a nice representation of what happened in history. Full action from the first minute. Gameplay sometimes did not feel completely good and often the scripted moments are very clear. After completing the campaign, you no longer pick up the game quickly. Nevertheless nice to have played the game!
  69. Voodoo123
    Oct 15, 2019
    7
    +Exceptional visual quality/animations
    +Great cast
    +Excellent level design -Predictable set pieces -Extremely linear experience There was alot of big talk from the devs leading up to the release suggesting a reinvention of the COD game design, sadly this was not the case just more of the same in a new skin - that isnt a flaw as the formula is still successful here, just    +Exceptional visual quality/animations
    +Great cast
    +Excellent level design
    -Predictable set pieces
    -Extremely linear experience

    There was alot of big talk from the devs leading up to the release suggesting a reinvention of the COD game design, sadly this was not the case just more of the same in a new skin - that isnt a flaw as the formula is still successful here, just disappointing that more couldn't be done to push the franchise forwards given the IMO extremely entertaining (but poorly received) infinite warfare. COD WW2 is a great but not ground breaking game (review as based on SP not MP).    … Expand
  70. Garfield2010
    Sep 6, 2019
    7
    I got this game at a well discounted price. It is a typical Call of Duty game. I have only played the single player campaign thus far. The pace is very fast. As per usual you are a super human killing 50+ enemies per mission and you are a specialist bombardier, recon, sniper, driver etc. The game jumps from the one scene to the next - non stop action. The pacing seems a bit off withI got this game at a well discounted price. It is a typical Call of Duty game. I have only played the single player campaign thus far. The pace is very fast. As per usual you are a super human killing 50+ enemies per mission and you are a specialist bombardier, recon, sniper, driver etc. The game jumps from the one scene to the next - non stop action. The pacing seems a bit off with too much happening all the time. Every mission has an element where you need to rescue someone, clear certain areas, hold certain areas for a time period, some allies dying violently and a little bit of quick time melee. Very very linear.

    Good entertainment for a teenager I would say. Its basically a gaming version of Saving Private Ryan 15 years later    … Expand
  71. 24ysoldgamer
    Jul 27, 2019
    6
    The campaign in this game is not the best it's shallow and they play it safe but I enjoyed it and had some good time in it especially d_day and the multiplayer is really cool and I love it especially that challenges it's very rewarding but there is so many loading that kill the experience and that new war mode is not very much but I like it finally the zombie mode is boring and repetitive .
  72. mikemormai
    May 6, 2019
    7
    call of duty , mais do mesmo, poderia ter ficado melhor, a historia e bem legal, pena que o multi ficou mais do mesmo
  73. Naedeslus
    Apr 13, 2019
    5
    It's okay. It starts off great, the campaign goes to the most famous battle in all of WW2, D-Day and the first mission is great. If only the rest was as interesting. The problem is, is that I've seen it before. It doesn't really do anything new. Sure the first mission is great but after that, it just felt like MW2 with a WW2 skin over it.

    It also for a WW2 isn't that historically    It's okay. It starts off great, the campaign goes to the most famous battle in all of WW2, D-Day and the first mission is great. If only the rest was as interesting. The problem is, is that I've seen it before. It doesn't really do anything new. Sure the first mission is great but after that, it just felt like MW2 with a WW2 skin over it.

    It also for a WW2 isn't that historically accurate. If you're sensitive to some games being too PC, stay the hell away because they don't even have the enemies wear the Nazi uniforms. This game could've been Activision's chance to give us a gritty but over the top experience and it just fell flat.

    The combat is more of the same as COD has been for the past 10+ years. If you love it, you'll love it but it feels too arcadey. The AI is braindead most of the time and it just doesn't have a sort of impact I'd prefer.

    Not a horrible FPS and you could do worse but if you like historically accurate WW2 games, this isn't for you. If you wanted COD to maybe feel a bit less arcadey and have better AI, this won't do it. The only ones I can really recommend this to are die-hard fans of the series.

    COD really needs to find a way to reinvent itself because it's very stale and this proves just how stale it has become.    … Expand
  74. R3HAP3R
    Feb 4, 2019
    7
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
  75. Cooper_Reviews
    Nov 29, 2018
    6
    Visuals: 8/10
    Audio and sound design: 9/10
    Game-play: 5/10 Story: 5/10 Replay-ability: 5/10 Overall Score: 6.2/10 Call of Duty: WWI, is a true example of style over substance. The game is beautiful and the presentation is top notch but the substance of this game negates much replay-ability, the generic maps, a boring and lazily written story with a few good moments, and overall    Visuals: 8/10
    Audio and sound design: 9/10
    Game-play: 5/10
    Story: 5/10
    Replay-ability: 5/10

    Overall Score: 6.2/10

    Call of Duty: WWI, is a true example of style over substance. The game is beautiful and the presentation is top notch but the substance of this game negates much replay-ability, the generic maps, a boring and lazily written story with a few good moments, and overall just a mediocre package. Not a horrible game by any means but certainly not a good one.    … Expand
  76. TheQuietGamer
    Nov 24, 2018
    7
    Call of Duty goes back to its World War 2 roots. A return to form that will be welcomed by anyone tired of wall running and jet packs. This back-to-basics approach is comfortable as an old shoe, but the new additions are hit-or-miss and the lack of risks taken won't do anything to win back those who found the series to have gotten stale some time ago.

    The campaign: Sledgehammer Games    Call of Duty goes back to its World War 2 roots. A return to form that will be welcomed by anyone tired of wall running and jet packs. This back-to-basics approach is comfortable as an old shoe, but the new additions are hit-or-miss and the lack of risks taken won't do anything to win back those who found the series to have gotten stale some time ago.

    The campaign:
    Sledgehammer Games shows once again that they're almost as good at telling stories as the team at Treyarch. With the exception of the protagonist (whose voice actor has some trouble maintaining his southern accent), I actually cared about the characters. I wasn't a big fan of the gameplay changes though. The removal of recharging health for a limited bar that you need to keep an eye on is at odds with the chaotic nature of the action where bullets come at you from every direction. The new squad system where your AI teammates can resupply you with ammo and first aid kits is interesting, but not fleshed out enough to have any real impact. While I was invested in the story actually playing through it wasn't something I enjoyed all that much.

    Zombies:
    I think WWII actually has one of the best iterations of the fan favorite cooperative mode. The new tone and setting are really creepy giving it a distinct vibe. All of the abilities, power-ups, and single use skills will be easier for newcomers to wrap their heads around than they were in Black Ops 3. While this change may not sit well with some, I love the addition of regularly updated goals for the sense of direction they give. Of course playing with randoms isn't ideal. Especially if you or they don't have a mic. This is still a mode that is at its strongest with friends.

    Multiplayer:
    The biggest portion of the package and the thing that's kept this franchise alive. It's where you'll feel the effects of the return to boots-on-the-ground style gameplay the most. With the removal of all the movement systems introduced over the years as the series pushed further and further into the future this really does feel like playing old school CoD. The new War mode can be quite a bit of fun with each map offering different objectives for teams to complete in order to win the match. It adds some nice variety, but can be a little unbalanced at times with certain objectives giving one side a clear advantage over the other. The Hub is kind of an odd addition. Giving you a place to interact with other players. It has its amusements, but for the most part I never used it.

    The loot box system is understandably controversial as it has led to the inclusion of microtransactions. They are totally frivolous though as all they offer are cosmetic options. They're given out at random and you can earn them by completing "contracts" that require you to complete certain challenges. You can even get specific things you want with the easy to amass in-game currency by going to the Hub. So you'll never feel pressured to spend any money on them. Personally, I kind of like them as they mean I don't have to hit some crazy goal just to get a stupid charm or skin for my guns.

    Newcomers and longtime fans alike are going to face a bit of a learning curve when it comes to navigating WWII's confusing mess of menus. I don't know why Sledgehammer decided to ditch the sleak, easy to figure out layout of previous CoD titles, but it wasn't a smart move. Its the kind of thing that helped put Medal of Honor: Warfighter in a very early grave and has kept me from ever sticking with a Battlefield game for too long. I also encountered a startling amount of disconnects from matches. The stability is quite questionable given the meaty update sizes.

    Technical:
    Patch sizes are something Sledgehammer really needs to work on. I've been able to get every update put out for all of both Treyarch's and Infinity Ward's entries in the series over the years without ever having to worry about whether or not I had enough space for them. Here though I had to clear out a nice chunk of memory to make room. This was in issue for Advanced Warfare as well and I abandoned that game because of it.

    Conclusion:
    If you've wanted to see the series return to a more grounded style of play that's free of laser beams and robots then this is the CoD for you. Sledgehammer has tried to add some defining changes to the mix with varying degrees of success. Overall though this is another solid addition to the franchise and a sign that perhaps we haven't seen everything this conflict has to offer.

    7.9/10    … Expand
  77. BSchwarz95
    Nov 14, 2018
    7
    True CoD will always have three pillars to the game: campaign, zombies, and multiplayer. The campaign was okay, the zombies was great, and the multiplayer was an absolute blast. I haven't played a Call of Duty game since MW3, until WWII. I jumped into the multiplayer and loved every second of it. There weren't many maps at the start but that meant that players could completely master theirTrue CoD will always have three pillars to the game: campaign, zombies, and multiplayer. The campaign was okay, the zombies was great, and the multiplayer was an absolute blast. I haven't played a Call of Duty game since MW3, until WWII. I jumped into the multiplayer and loved every second of it. There weren't many maps at the start but that meant that players could completely master their technique and strategy in order to bend the combat to their will. My favorite game mode was easily Hardcore Dom and after reaching master prestige, I still can't get enough of that game mode. The zombies mode felt fresh, too. The easter eggs, mechanics, and story were exciting to spend time with and although it's exactly what you'd expect the zombies mode to be like, I still thoroughly enjoyed it as somebody who never felt interested in playing it at all. And, the campaign. Meh. It was "fine." The story, gameplay, level design, characters, all acceptable with no real emotion or excitement at all. All in all, a lot of fun but the lack of true creative genius makes this a hard recommendation. This is more of a guilty pleasure than anything else.… Expand
  78. GrantD243
    Oct 21, 2018
    7
    The campaign was a joke, but the multiplayer of WWII was a solid throwback to earlier Call of Dutys, and I never got tired of it. The orders and supply drops may be seen as a cash grab by some people, but they kept me coming back to the game over and over. One of the better Call of Duty games in a while.
  79. BonkTrap
    Oct 16, 2018
    5
    I was on the hype train for a boots on the ground call of duty game, but it turned out to be meh at best, litteraly feels like a bad treyarch game, gameplay does not feel as solid, the campain is just a **** action movie and the zombies is just a poor man version of the treyarch zombies gamemode. I get that the zombies mode is trying to be scary, but the jumpscares just get old real fast,I was on the hype train for a boots on the ground call of duty game, but it turned out to be meh at best, litteraly feels like a bad treyarch game, gameplay does not feel as solid, the campain is just a **** action movie and the zombies is just a poor man version of the treyarch zombies gamemode. I get that the zombies mode is trying to be scary, but the jumpscares just get old real fast, they should just look up to verrukt, this is how you make a scary zombie map… Expand
  80. Lewis-Angelo
    Oct 12, 2018
    6
    la historia está bien, pero es una de cal y otra de arena constante
    gráficamente es una pasada, con unas cgi brutales, y algunas misiones que están muy chulas
    el sonido normalito, con un doblaje mejorable y una mezcla bastante mala, sorprende porque ahí solían ser los mejores y se nota descuidado el argumento obviamente no sorprende y se ha quedado corta, se hecha de menos que avancen    la historia está bien, pero es una de cal y otra de arena constante
    gráficamente es una pasada, con unas cgi brutales, y algunas misiones que están muy chulas
    el sonido normalito, con un doblaje mejorable y una mezcla bastante mala, sorprende porque ahí solían ser los mejores y se nota descuidado
    el argumento obviamente no sorprende y se ha quedado corta, se hecha de menos que avancen más, imposible no acordarse de los Medal of Honor
    y como COD tampoco es que destaque, mejor que los Black Ops es fácil ser, pero el Advanced Warfare les había quedado mejor a Sledgehammer

    detalles como que te falte una bala en el rifle y meta las 5 de golpe quedan mal, el apuntado del francotirador que ralentiza tampoco me ha entusiasmado, la IA parece que ha ido hacia atrás, vuelven los enemigos infinitos en algunas zonas, etc
    o que se quede el juego pillado porque tienes que ponerte en X zona para que pase Y cosa, pero como ya te moviste previendo la acción, pues estás matando enemigos atontados mientras el juego espera que vuelvas al sitio

    del multijugador y los zombies mejor no decir nada, ya ni atrae probar esos modos    … Expand
  81. PeterAlexander
    Sep 11, 2018
    7
    Call of Duty WWII has an amazing campaign, but it isn't enough to save it from being one of the weaker entries in the series. The online play is disengaging and tarnished by easily forgettable maps and the zombies mode is incredibly lacklustre in comparison to the main Black Ops series entries.
  82. mikect92
    Aug 15, 2018
    6
    Call of Duty WWII can be split into 3 game modes each of which is radically different to each other.

    The campaign is the best in the Call of Duty franchise since Black Ops. It has stunning visuals, great characters and has a compelling story. It has replay-ability and manages to stay interesting. The only real negative of the campaign is that it is too action packed, which is a common    Call of Duty WWII can be split into 3 game modes each of which is radically different to each other.

    The campaign is the best in the Call of Duty franchise since Black Ops. It has stunning visuals, great characters and has a compelling story. It has replay-ability and manages to stay interesting. The only real negative of the campaign is that it is too action packed, which is a common problem with COD games. Huge explosions, great falls and unrealistic odds make the game unrealistic and goofy.

    The online multiplayer (which for most is the highlight of the game) is the polar opposite of the campaign. The visuals take a hit and are noticeably worse than the story. The maps are boring and not very re playable and it is a forgettable and boring experience. The maps are small and linear, the invisible walls are unforgivable and 2 of the very limited maps are obvious copies of Modern Warfare maps. Unlike the campaign which was over the top, the multiplayer is so under whelming. On top of this, the multiplayer suffers from pay to win mechanics and poor servers. Most guns are locked behind loot boxes which you can either pay real money for or grind like hell, only to end up with customised weapon grips. A FPS has customised weapon grips which are barely visible! As for servers, i played the game about 7-8 months after release and i keep being kicked from games and being locked out of matches. After 8 months, this should have been fixed.

    The final game mode is Zombies. Zombies is fun and interesting. There is a story and multiple different objectives and the map is huge. It is difficult however and is best played with friends in co-op.

    Over all, this game is a mixed bag, excelling in some game modes but horrifically failing in others. The campaign is great, as is Zombies, however the Online seriously holds the game back from greatness.    … Expand
  83. RubenPrinsloo
    Aug 8, 2018
    6
    I can really say that it is a great game. It is also not the best Call of Duty I have played. I like the characters and where it takes place.

    My only problem is as follows: My game is lagging like really a lot. Every time I play, it starts to lag. Then when I want to continue someone killed me or my game does not want to continue. So, every time this happens, I must restart the whole    I can really say that it is a great game. It is also not the best Call of Duty I have played. I like the characters and where it takes place.

    My only problem is as follows:
    My game is lagging like really a lot. Every time I play, it starts to lag. Then when I want to continue someone killed me or my game does not want to continue. So, every time this happens, I must restart the whole game and start from the beginning. Then I also want to ask to bring in more powerful weapons. For example, it takes 4 shots to kill someone, and by that time someone already killed me. My game also takes very long to connect online or in multiplayer.

    The Pros of the game:
    I really like the maps in the game. It has really nice hideouts for sniping. I also like to follow the story of how the game takes place. The best for me is the great graphics. It really looks realistic.

    I would recommend this game to people who likes war games.    … Expand
  84. p1menta
    Jul 5, 2018
    7
    same old same old, not bad, but it's still not really fine. the story is cliche and boring and stupid, and the brazillian portuguese voices are terrible, i wish i could at least play this **** in english. i dont ever play the multiplayers
  85. extradyHD
    Jun 18, 2018
    5
    I would give this game a meh and by meh I mean they could've done better, anyone remember world at war where the game was all like **** your feelings I don't care if your offended this is what happened WW2, but in this version it felt more like a Hollywood movie although the graphics and the gameplay was great the story was just lacking so much of what really happened in the war. Oh andI would give this game a meh and by meh I mean they could've done better, anyone remember world at war where the game was all like **** your feelings I don't care if your offended this is what happened WW2, but in this version it felt more like a Hollywood movie although the graphics and the gameplay was great the story was just lacking so much of what really happened in the war. Oh and the multiplayer don't even get me started all the maps are the same its like a three way lane where once you go left you can only go left and I see there still doing loot crates, what happened to our beloved cod where the delivered great storylines, opened spaced maps and overall no loot crates, this game is a big fat MEH.… Expand
  86. alexstunky
    May 25, 2018
    6
    Que puedo decir.....no es mal juego, pero tampoco brilla.
    Tenia esperanzas de que este juego subiera esta saga, pero creo que nos quedo a deber mucho, eso si la campaña me encanto demasiado, pero....el MP es mas de lo mismo cada año, no innova en nada, a veces es divertido, pero como dije antes, es mas de lo mismo cada año, lleno de DLC y obvio el modo zombies es lo mejor de cada año,    Que puedo decir.....no es mal juego, pero tampoco brilla.
    Tenia esperanzas de que este juego subiera esta saga, pero creo que nos quedo a deber mucho, eso si la campaña me encanto demasiado, pero....el MP es mas de lo mismo cada año, no innova en nada, a veces es divertido, pero como dije antes, es mas de lo mismo cada año, lleno de DLC y obvio el modo zombies es lo mejor de cada año, pero los DLC son muy exagerados ya, una lastima estas políticas.    … Expand
  87. Berrlett
    May 9, 2018
    7
    Good thing I bought it heavily discounted, going through the campaign its surely no match for BF1 but still enjoyable, the D day landing on French beach was created with saving private Ryan in vision, brutal and unforgiving what follows afterwards is average. Have yet to try the on-line features but if you're here for advice thinking to buy it mine will be yes, at a big discount (somethingGood thing I bought it heavily discounted, going through the campaign its surely no match for BF1 but still enjoyable, the D day landing on French beach was created with saving private Ryan in vision, brutal and unforgiving what follows afterwards is average. Have yet to try the on-line features but if you're here for advice thinking to buy it mine will be yes, at a big discount (something like 50% off)… Expand
  88. erfanbasket
    Apr 13, 2018
    6
    the story is really simple and nothing special but the game is overall entertaining
  89. SlightedHand
    Mar 23, 2018
    6
    Call Of Duty: WW2 is an above average game (just). For the price range, it isn't really, but there is still a lot of good old fashioned Call Of Duty in there. Is it fun? Yeah, sometimes. Is it replayable? Multiplayer yes, Campaign no, Zombies can be.
    Gameplay-
    This game is not revolutionary or innovative in a single aspect, nothing is inspired and because of that there isn't all that    Call Of Duty: WW2 is an above average game (just). For the price range, it isn't really, but there is still a lot of good old fashioned Call Of Duty in there. Is it fun? Yeah, sometimes. Is it replayable? Multiplayer yes, Campaign no, Zombies can be.
    Gameplay-
    This game is not revolutionary or innovative in a single aspect, nothing is inspired and because of that there isn't all that much interest in what you're doing. However there's a reason for this, and that is that Call Of Duty essentially has set the model for FPS games. It can't revolutionise because then it stops being true to its series. You could argue that this means the series should just stop, an argument I sit on the fence with. Anyway, the campaign is mediocre. The voice acting is good but aside from that its just occasional cinematic moments and repetitive points (and whoever created that piece of garbage tank section in the Aachen mission is going to hell, that is truly terrible). It's a Call Of Duty campaign. Not bad, definitely not great. The multiplayer I actually properly enjoyed. TDM, S&D etc are the same thing as in every other game. However war, this is just good, thank whatever god you pray to they made this. This mode is repetitive but it's actually fun, a brilliant bridge between campaign and multiplayer. It takes you along these mission based maps each with their own tense checkpoints. This kept this game from being a 4 and bumped it up to a 6. This is exactly what you'd hope for in a Call Of Duty game. The zombies is pretty good. They pivoted completely from Infinite Warfare and went for a dark, nightmarish approach, there are literal moments of almost pure darkness in the easter egg. The problem primarily with the zombies is that really there is only one base game zombies map which gets boring after completing the Easter egg for your fifth time. The mini map you get for completing the EE is just bad. It has a quick pace but it honestly feels like a tutorial map, because it is also the tutorial map, it's pretty lazy for the developer to release it as the only other map. Also David Tenants character doesn't really fit in this area of the game, he has quips and is meant to be a bit of comic relief. However their approach of a horror zombies makes his character just seem wrong.
    Aesthetic-
    Visually this game has a fine aesthetic. Its hyper realistic but its very brown and grey as their primary hues. In the zombies its really cool though, the zombies are covered in torn flesh and twisted metal, it really fits their tone of a near horror approach to zombies. The soundtrack and audio is pretty good. Its got no pumping riffs and power chords like Black Ops 1, instead it's quite classical and very similar to Battlefield 1's soundtrack. Good, but nothing inspiring.
    Replayability-
    If a single person says that the campaign is replayable, they are full of it. It is not even remotely interesting enough to be worth playing more than once, it's barely worth playing just that once. Multiplayer, it generally is except for War which just yes. War is the smartest, most replayable thing a COD game has implemented in years. The zombies is until you've played it for more than 20 solid goes. Then it gets stale, which is frustrating as it is designed as a mode to be done lots of times.

    In conclusion, COD:WW2 is fairly uninspired with almost nothing thats particularly new or interesting. I give it a 6 as there is enough to do and is worth the price tag, however if you dislike previous Call Of Duty's then you'll dislike this one. Except for War. Mhm that is actually good. It's fine, not bad, but certainly not revolutionary either.    … Expand
  90. dr_zorua
    Mar 6, 2018
    7
    A great game with a great campaign and good quick time events and great stealth that you will love! The multiplayer is fun but the community is too salty, like play the mountain faction in a comp map that doesn't have good sniping spots you will get yelled at by like a five year old or a twenty year old yelling at you. Still a great game!
  91. Paragon89
    Mar 5, 2018
    7
    Bit of a tough one to review.

    I haven't played COD since BOP2- so cant really judge on the evolution on the next-gen platforms. But based on what I've heard its been a pretty crap Era. Start with the Good. + Visuals Looks grest especially in the campaign. Havent played any of the next-gen era titles but it seems really good. I was happy with that. + Zombies is still good,    Bit of a tough one to review.

    I haven't played COD since BOP2- so cant really judge on the evolution on the next-gen platforms. But based on what I've heard its been a pretty crap Era.

    Start with the Good.
    + Visuals Looks grest especially in the campaign. Havent played any of the next-gen era titles but it seems really good. I was happy with that.

    + Zombies is still good, different but at least its not same old and they actually evolved it. But hasn't become some bloated expanded mess and have managed to keep it feeling fairly simple and ground the classic maps. They have objectives now but are entirely optional. and is better than BOP2 Zombies anyway.

    + More customisation - plenty of customisation if your into that like your character, weapon skins etc

    + War and Headquarters, adds new multiplayer depth. added value and things to do. Tries to bring a story to the multiplayer.

    + Solid Multiplayer experience, not really a plus, but if your used to what they do year in year out, and are happy with that then you know your going to get a solid pick up and play multiplayer experience to fill in your hours when your bored.

    + While I haven't played AW/BOP3/IW so I don't know if they have these features. I really like the addition of Divisions and the new way of doing Perks to create unique combinations.

    Negatives
    - My biggest gripe with COD has always been the respawn system in multiplayer progressively getting worse with each instalment coupled with the average size of maps getting smaller means I often find I have enemies closer to me than allies and usually behind me. There's no logical direction to run in when you spawn. Which with WWII is still broken it seems.

    - Loot crates, that was a obvious one to get on the list. While it doesn't really bother me for COD as its a game where you grab any gun and kill people. I don't really see the need to pay for anything for the core experience. its all mainly cosmetic. and any guns don't really hamper you.

    -value for money , there is less maps at launch and have paid the same price, fair enough there's WAR mode but doesn't really justify it as I imagine its not something the core player base will get involved with. Same with map packs, less for your money.

    Now the personal things that stand out for me

    While COD gains superficial changes each year often depending on who's developing. Some Key features are missing or changed that I miss.

    for example I loved the Support and Specialist Play styles of MF3 it was a great way to help Assist/Support and lone wolves playstyles build a different set of killstreaks/perks and bring changes to the game. While this game kinda has it with divisions and the new Perk system Its something I miss.

    Killstreaks - I know its WW2 so its rooted and limited in technology etc, but Attack Dogs is missing!? I know we have paratroopers but come on! give us more streaks! - there seems to be a general lack of streaks(different streaks as well) to be fair I cant really think of any beyond the dogs that is missing, maybe drop a AI controlled tank on the battlefield that enemy team has to blow up....

    - Rooted is bad in a way - off the back of the last point, while its nice to be simple and go back to the roots, I cant help but feel they have stripped a lot meat from its bones. and while there is a solid core experience it lacks the added value to help with longevity. I feel ive grown tired on this COD instalment a lo faster than I have the others.

    Overall I've given it a 7. Its Classic COD and I love it for that and can pass many hours playing it. its solid and you cant go wrong. however it hasn't evolved as a franchise and doesn't have the added value to make it worth the price. Id give it a 9 if they would fix the respawn system.

    Whats Next? Call of Duty: Chronicle's - a time travelling adventure that features Easters eggs and cameos from all games. and Resets the whole timeline. and the Multiplayer maps is just remastered versions of the top 20 maps of all time.    … Expand
  92. HappyPhilXD
    Mar 1, 2018
    5
    Just bought it for PS4 because a friend wanted to play with me.

    Visuals: Graphics are mediocre, it tries to stay at 60fps, the effects are from 2009. Controls: It's ok to play with controller, the auto aim is pretty heavy so you can hit something. It's not as smooth as Halo or Destiny when it comes to aiming. Gameplay: There are good amount of weapons but for the most times all    Just bought it for PS4 because a friend wanted to play with me.

    Visuals:
    Graphics are mediocre, it tries to stay at 60fps, the effects are from 2009.

    Controls:
    It's ok to play with controller, the auto aim is pretty heavy so you can hit something. It's not as smooth as Halo or Destiny when it comes to aiming.

    Gameplay:
    There are good amount of weapons but for the most times all players use the same guns because some of them are over effective. Talking to you fire shotgun.
    The maps are not the best part. I enjoy only 2 of the 9 maps because for the most parts there was no thought behind them.
    It wouldn't be an CoD without Cheaters. I thought there couldn't be that many Cheaters on PS4 than on PC but I was wrong. There is at least one blatant 360° spinning aimboting idiot in 1 of 3 games and some other "strange" players.

    Gamemodes:
    There are enough maps and modes to keep me occupied for a little while, most of them standard fps fast food.
    The zombie mode is good. They changed some thing and I have to say it's refreshing.
    Campaign is standard. Pew pew action with nice settings.

    All in all a normal mediocre CoD with the attempt to cash in on the World War hype Battlefield 1 started. Does nothing particular wrong but neither right. Should be ok for fans but I would suggest waiting for a sale.    … Expand
  93. Lowzone
    Feb 20, 2018
    6
    Trop court.... manque de materiel pour le mode de jeu solo. Le mode zombie n’est pas aussi addictif qu’il aurait pu l’etre.... je m’ennuie de world at war....

    Bon points: sound design impressionnant Gameplay efficace et combat bien balancé VO excellent Visuellement magnifique Mauvais points : Manque de contenu Balancement des armes me semble inadéquat Variété inexistante ... 1    Trop court.... manque de materiel pour le mode de jeu solo. Le mode zombie n’est pas aussi addictif qu’il aurait pu l’etre.... je m’ennuie de world at war....

    Bon points:
    sound design impressionnant
    Gameplay efficace et combat bien balancé
    VO excellent
    Visuellement magnifique

    Mauvais points :
    Manque de contenu
    Balancement des armes me semble inadéquat
    Variété inexistante ... 1 mission de char, 1 mission d’aviation.... donnez m’en plus!
    Zombie ennuyant
    Multiplayer = reskin des derniers titres de la série aucune innovation.

    Overall: 5.5/10    … Expand
  94. MustafaTqu95
    Feb 9, 2018
    7
    طور اللعب الفردي أو القصة كان جيد كـ قصة وايضا طريقة لعب ولكن كان وللأسف قصير وكنت أتمنى لو يكون بهيئة العب التعاوني بدل أصدقاء داخل اللعبى بذكاء اصطناعي , وبالنسبة لطور الزومبي ف هو تقريبا الحسنة الوحيدة في اللعبة رغم قلة الخرائظ ولكن وبشكل عام كان جيد وأستمتعت به نوعا ما وبالنسبة لطور اللعب الجماعي ورغم عدم وجود القفز ولكن لازال الموت بسرعة بحيث لا يمكن أتخاذ أي ردة فعل عند الأطلاق عليكطور اللعب الفردي أو القصة كان جيد كـ قصة وايضا طريقة لعب ولكن كان وللأسف قصير وكنت أتمنى لو يكون بهيئة العب التعاوني بدل أصدقاء داخل اللعبى بذكاء اصطناعي , وبالنسبة لطور الزومبي ف هو تقريبا الحسنة الوحيدة في اللعبة رغم قلة الخرائظ ولكن وبشكل عام كان جيد وأستمتعت به نوعا ما وبالنسبة لطور اللعب الجماعي ورغم عدم وجود القفز ولكن لازال الموت بسرعة بحيث لا يمكن أتخاذ أي ردة فعل عند الأطلاق عليك .… Expand
  95. claytastic
    Feb 4, 2018
    5
    Call of Duty continues to prove itself to be the most boring franchise out there with WWII. I didn't have high expectations, and actually wasn't planning on buying it. But some of my friends told me I would enjoy it, so I got it when it was on sale. They were pretty wrong.

    Don't get me wrong, it has some of the best graphics and sound design out there, and nails the look and feel of    Call of Duty continues to prove itself to be the most boring franchise out there with WWII. I didn't have high expectations, and actually wasn't planning on buying it. But some of my friends told me I would enjoy it, so I got it when it was on sale. They were pretty wrong.

    Don't get me wrong, it has some of the best graphics and sound design out there, and nails the look and feel of World War 2. It also plays pretty well, and can be enjoyed for an unextended amount of time, but in terms of the rest of it, there's nothing here.

    Let's start off with the campaign. It's bad. I mean, what did you expect? The characters are boring and lifeless, and no amount of Hollywood actors is going to make me change my mind about that. Call of Duty just doesn't have good campaigns anymore. They pretty much stopped trying after the first Black Ops because I guess they realised that no one played the campaigns anymore. This one really proves that point, though, because in the multiplayer, they censored the Swastikas, and there are black and female soldiers running about, even on the side of the Nazis. Not that I'm opposed to diversity, but in a game selling itself on historical accuracy, that really puts a dent in the illusion. However, in the campaign, there are Swastikas everywhere, and no females in sight (minus one who plays a fairly minor role). Why do you think this is? Because no one plays the campaign. They could make it the most violent game ever, and no one would care. Besides that problem, the campaign never really has any twists or turns. It's just standard and pretty boring most of the time. I'm not gonna sit here and pretend to care about ANOTHER soldier who has family at home who we can all predict is gonna die.

    The multiplayer isn't much of a step up, either. At first, I was kinda upset that they were continuing to make futuristic games with Infinite Warfare, but World War 2 has made me realise something. Going futuristic was the best thing that happened to Call of Duty. Both Advanced Warfare and Black Ops 3 are two of my favourites because the futuristic setting allowed for more variety. The double jumps and wall running in Advanced Warfare was the biggest change the series had made since the switch to a modern setting in CoD 4. Plus, this gave them the opportunity to have more weapon and ability variety. It needed refining, but it was a nice change of pace. Black Ops 3 was the perfect follow up because it did all of the refining that needed to be done in Advanced Warfare, and became what I would say is my favourite Call of Duty (even though the campaign didn't measure up to that of previous franchise entries). The only reason I hated Infinite Warfare was because it was just Black Ops 3 with worse maps and one of the series' worst campaigns. To say World War 2 has improved on this or evolved the series in any way is a joke because all they did was return to a style that everyone thought they wanted, but then realised they didn't. I always kind of knew that just going back to modern or historical settings wouldn't automatically fix Call of Duty, but I was hoping that it would provide some slight ounce of innovation. And it kinda did. The new War mode, which is the newest thing CoD has done since the jump kits in Advanced Warfare, is actually pretty neat. You're dropped into a linear map in which you and your team either have to complete an objective or drive the other team back from doing that. And while it's infinitely more fun to play the attacking team than it is to play defending, I still enjoyed my time with it. Other than that, though, there's nothing new or fresh about World War 2's multiplayer. If you've played a modern or historical CoD's multiplayer, you've played this one.

    Lastly, there's the zombies, which has absolutely nothing new or interesting about it. It's just boring, honestly. So much so that I have absolutely nothing to say about it besides the fact that Ving Rhames is in it, so that's cool.

    Overall, CoD WW2 is the furthest thing from a fresh gaming experience as you can possibly get. It's fun in short bursts and has some creative ideas, but none of them are ever executed to their full potential. 5/10.    … Expand
  96. johnnypxc
    Jan 17, 2018
    7
    Id rate it a 7.8/10 if there were decimals allowed here. Id say it is pretty solid in terms of returning to the classic boots on the ground combat. Its ages better than the last couple cods. The only things I really disliked about it were that id rate the zombies a 6/10 because it has changed too much from the golden day waw-bops 2 era and is far too fast paced, "if it aint broke dont fixId rate it a 7.8/10 if there were decimals allowed here. Id say it is pretty solid in terms of returning to the classic boots on the ground combat. Its ages better than the last couple cods. The only things I really disliked about it were that id rate the zombies a 6/10 because it has changed too much from the golden day waw-bops 2 era and is far too fast paced, "if it aint broke dont fix it", and of course the loot boxes which are hilariously bad, (you always get pistol grips that you cant even see on your gun).… Expand
  97. brat1111
    Jan 7, 2018
    5
    The shooting, that I liked so much in Black Ops 3, just feels off and clunky in this game. The graphics are good in some campaign levels but not that great overall. I am very disappointed. Don't bother buying this game, that's my advice, man.
  98. Enddless
    Jan 3, 2018
    6
    Мультиплеер хорош, особенно война, убийство подтверждено и зомби. Сюжет говно и вся кампания это коридор сботами.
  99. SrPepe
    Jan 2, 2018
    5
    Una campaña... cuestionable y aburrida. Si quieres pasar de dar escenarios increibles como la destrucción de la torre Eiffel o la estatua de la libertad a pelear en campos y casas viejas debes saber muy bien como manejarlo y no lo han sabido hacer. Una campaña que se me hizo aburrida.

    Probe el multijugador muy poco, pero lo mismo de siempre.
  100. Ninjeye
    Dec 28, 2017
    7
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The game is great, it is finally good to have a COD that does not run on walls, jump and hover or have any of the futuristic warfare in combat. I am a little sad as I am stationed in Japan and play on American servers on base and deal with a persistent lag, though I have noticed that it is worse than Black ops III. The sniper maps are amazing and remind me of Ghost even though this one is set during World War II. Being an actual Military member, I would have liked to see more emphasis on stealth, tactics and strategy as opposed to run and gun but I do understand that this is more of an arcade first person shooter than simulation. You are guaranteed to like it, which is why I actually give this game a 7.7, just under an 8 however, I believe my score will change once they hand over the first DLC and patches that fix the issues that I see happening on the game. For one thing, I have noticed how easy it is to team kill as your gun will lock on to a friend with ease and have difficulty locking onto the enemy. I have seen only a hand full of hackers and some will even tell you they are doing it which is my biggest issue as I do not believe in cheating. Anyways this is my first review but hopefully not the last. I am Ninjeye… Expand
prev
Page:

Awards & Rankings

82
#82 Best PS4 Game of 2017
9
#9 Most Discussed PS4 Game of 2017
9
#9 Most Shared PS4 Game of 2017

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
79

Generally favorable reviews - based on 83 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 62 out of 83
  2. Mixed: 21 out of 83
  3. Negative: 0 out of 83
  1. CD-Action
    Jan 10, 2018
    70
    I really wanted CoD’s return to World War II to be something more than a solid game – but it’s not. I couldn’t shake the feeling that I’ve already seen all this, that the developers (or perhaps the publisher) chose to create something as safe as possible. There’s just one campaign mission that surprised me with its scale, the rest is just a disappointing “best of Call of Duty”. The multiplayer is as good as usual, but it was infused with unnecessary systems resembling mobile titles, e.g spending in-game currency on pointless tasks of the “kill 100 enemies” variety. Missions that make you watch other players open their loot boxes are the pinnacle of absurdity. [13/2017, p.64]
  2. The Digital Fix
    Dec 22, 2017
    70
    A solid return to its roots, Call of Duty WWII reminds us what made us all fall in love Call of Duty in the first place. It ticks all the boxes which is both a blessing and a curse. Good fun and worth your time but offers nothing exceptional.
    Read full review
  3. Playstation Official Magazine UK
    Dec 15, 2017
    90
    Revitalised and exemplary FPS gaming. Multiplayer trims back to the essentials, campaign shows sensitivity and Zombies...well it's a new excuse to play CoD Zombies. [Christmas 2017, p.77]
See all critic reviews »