Call of Duty: WWII

 PlayStation 4
User Score
5.1

Mixed or average reviews- based on 2065 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 718 out of 2065
  2. Mixed: 482 out of 2065
  3. Negative: 865 out of 2065
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. CyclePlus
    Nov 10, 2017
    4
    Game is trash. Campaign is around 5 hours and is a fairly standard corridor shooter with nothing memorable that comes to mind in regards to the storyline or characters. It basically plays like an fps from 2003 but with fancier graphics.

    Multiplayer is where the ineptitude of Activation and Sledgehammer really shines through though. MP is a bug filled, lagging mess full of hit-markers    Game is trash. Campaign is around 5 hours and is a fairly standard corridor shooter with nothing memorable that comes to mind in regards to the storyline or characters. It basically plays like an fps from 2003 but with fancier graphics.

    Multiplayer is where the ineptitude of Activation and Sledgehammer really shines through though. MP is a bug filled, lagging mess full of hit-markers that don't kill your enemies due to Activision's refusal to implement dedicated servers and one of the most counter intuitive menu systems of all time. The perk system in this game is pretty much non-existent and there are only 9 maps available which are all uninspired 3 route camper fests and a chore to play.

    The only reason anyone even likes this game is because the previous three titles in this franchise set the bar so astronomical low that something as asinine as boots on the ground game play seems refreshing to the fanboys who waste their money on this game year after year.    … Expand
  2. Ikarimalice
    Nov 20, 2017
    4
    Simply put, multiplayer this time around feels the most broken in terms of lag compensation the series has ever had. If I play at 2 or 3 in the morning(EST) I manage high KDR. If I play during prime time, it's pretty much me going 3-20 every match. Gun fights are unwinnable. Half the time I'm shooting at someone the hits aren't registering and if they do, I still will likely be killedSimply put, multiplayer this time around feels the most broken in terms of lag compensation the series has ever had. If I play at 2 or 3 in the morning(EST) I manage high KDR. If I play during prime time, it's pretty much me going 3-20 every match. Gun fights are unwinnable. Half the time I'm shooting at someone the hits aren't registering and if they do, I still will likely be killed first(this is even when I'm crouching around a corner proned and waiting for someone to run into my sights). I wrote this review after attempting to play with a shotgun. I ran around a corner, fired into someone's head and didn't receive a hit marker before I was killed. A respawn later, I sprinted and rounded into someone who ran around a corner at the same time as myself, but somehow fired 4 shots before I could hit my trigger once. This is so bad because it makes the entire sub machine gun/shot gun classes unplayable for those with strong connections. I *have* to use long range assault rifles and even then, I *have* to be viewing down scope before someone is in sight to stand a chance. Ever wanted to know what it feels like to consistently prone down in a corner half covered by a wall waiting for someone to round a corner(not because you're a camper, but because you *have* to camp) and then when they do, they STILL manage to zoom down their scope at you and fire 3 shots before you get to fire one, and then in the replay that half second you saw them before being shot was actually a full 1-2 seconds? Then play this.… Expand
  3. mrnice
    Jun 17, 2020
    4
    If the setting isn't cliched enough for you, the nazi zombies multiplayer mode serves an even bigger cliche. Just a corporate product for the mindless masses.
  4. Tubey
    Nov 4, 2017
    4
    CoD: WWII goes back to the roots of the series in all the wrong ways possible. Instead of taking the best of what made CoD a smash hit and injecting new life into it, they have cherry picked the same old same old stale nonsense, cobbling together a dated, lifeless single player campaign with every FPS "story mode" trope you care to think of, combined it with the same old same old casualCoD: WWII goes back to the roots of the series in all the wrong ways possible. Instead of taking the best of what made CoD a smash hit and injecting new life into it, they have cherry picked the same old same old stale nonsense, cobbling together a dated, lifeless single player campaign with every FPS "story mode" trope you care to think of, combined it with the same old same old casual multiplayer boredom and dropped in the most bollocks loot box system yet devised by mankind.

    Oh, but the critics love it, don't they? Well, they would, given that most of them reviewed it at a special swanky event held by Activision, closely supervised for their impressions whilst having their every need catered for. "Gaming journalism" indeed; integrity personified. Amazing how that little tidbit of trivia isn't widely publicised eh? Pfft...

    I am convinced people buy this out of habit at this point. I certainly don't buy it, but I think everyone has that one friend who still does because the series made him happy when he was a teenager or something and it's become a drug to them. They tolerate any level of pure crap the series throws at them because they scored that perfect kill 10 years ago and it made them smile.

    Good for them. For the rest of us who can't casually discard our brain, CoD:WWII is a complete waste of time and epitomises every single last thing wrong with this ridiculous industry.    … Expand
  5. matdevine21
    Nov 4, 2017
    4
    Had high hopes but the entire campaign feels disjointed and lacking focus, also the change from regenerating health to health packs whilst adding a level of difficulty does stop this feeling like a COD game and more like a Steam Unity knock off.

    Multiplayer is meh, nothing different from the old World at War, lacks maps and game modes. My main problem with this supposed next generation    Had high hopes but the entire campaign feels disjointed and lacking focus, also the change from regenerating health to health packs whilst adding a level of difficulty does stop this feeling like a COD game and more like a Steam Unity knock off.

    Multiplayer is meh, nothing different from the old World at War, lacks maps and game modes.
    My main problem with this supposed next generation of maps is that they are no different than last gen, where is the dynamic settings? why cant there be a physical changes to the map randomly i.e. a battle on a sinking battleship or a war around you with buildings exploding? its just lazy and derriviative but compared to what Activision charges for season pass / map packs its just insulting!

    Loot crates are obviously there, disgusting to have them opening on normandy batlefield in your "social area" and visable to all, there really isnt an "enough money earned here" is there!

    Overall I feel more down on the franchise now than ever before, it needs to go away and have a high level rethink about COD's future as come next year, COD will not be a pre order or even a day one purchase for me!    … Expand
  6. Talbis
    Nov 4, 2017
    4
    I once said that if Call of Duty will return to World War II I'll give it another chance. Well, here we are.

    One of the most vivid games in my memory is the first Call of Duty, the campaign that made me simply happy to play and replay it over and over. This time around the campaign is amazing. I love it. Characters are great, the story is compelling and both audio and visuals are of the    I once said that if Call of Duty will return to World War II I'll give it another chance. Well, here we are.

    One of the most vivid games in my memory is the first Call of Duty, the campaign that made me simply happy to play and replay it over and over. This time around the campaign is amazing. I love it. Characters are great, the story is compelling and both audio and visuals are of the best quality I have ever seen in CoD. I can see myself playing it again and again alongside the first games. Props on this one. And man, I wish I could buy a singleplayer only for a third of a price because the rest of this game...

    Zombies have zombies. Enough said. I vomit with zombies. Movies, TV, games, zombies are everywhere. They are boring. They were boring years ago. Just stop making zombie games and movies already! They've been done to death... Pun intended.

    Multiplayer is weird. You have that new hub section where a bunch of people run around, open boxes with random **** and do nothing but look for a menu to see the multiplayer modes. It's confusing at first but it is a good idea... but seeing loot boxes being open, seeing other people getting some random junk made me realize that the point of this hub is to gloat about your loot. Nothing social or interesting takes place here, just consumerism at its finest! The gameplay itself is like CoD of old. No recoil, no strategy, no thinking. Maps are built with sniper nests and choke points from grounds up, so... every game looks exactly the same. It gets boring after a while and because of how weapons handle you feel like the game was programmed as your first shooter - when you're done go play something better (most games are better).

    To sum this up. Singleplayer campaign is an easy 9/10, multiplayer is for me 3/10 (7/10 for CoD players) and zombies is about -1000/10. It's a shame you can't buy just the singleplayer, I'd pay for that.    … Expand
  7. northernlad
    Nov 5, 2017
    4
    where to start multiplayer 6v6 is it not 2017? maps are tiny even for a cod game campaign is short which i wouldn't mind if it was great but its not boots on the ground not gonna twist about that no jet packs is a plus this game series must have made a small countrys worth of money in profit over the years the seer inept level design tiny player counts tiny campaign are unbelievable thewhere to start multiplayer 6v6 is it not 2017? maps are tiny even for a cod game campaign is short which i wouldn't mind if it was great but its not boots on the ground not gonna twist about that no jet packs is a plus this game series must have made a small countrys worth of money in profit over the years the seer inept level design tiny player counts tiny campaign are unbelievable the gaming industry at the minute has me worried microtransactions poor poor game releases i may need to start a new hobby… Expand
  8. Euknowia
    Nov 5, 2017
    4
    Another prosaic iteration in the COD series fulfilling the expectations of most – although the loot crates add a nice sinister touch (not to mention alluring players to the insidious and addictive temptation of gambling by incentivizing an exhibition of the virtually vain where lottery rewards are braggingly presented to varying onlookers assuring critics that Activision is indeed takingAnother prosaic iteration in the COD series fulfilling the expectations of most – although the loot crates add a nice sinister touch (not to mention alluring players to the insidious and addictive temptation of gambling by incentivizing an exhibition of the virtually vain where lottery rewards are braggingly presented to varying onlookers assuring critics that Activision is indeed taking steps on realizing their daunting casino dream through a system which they so modestly patented).
    - The campaign is too short, although decent, forgettable.
    - Game modes are banal (big surprise), done much better in alternative games of the same genre
    - Zombies are still fairly entertaining to play with friends, but the game mode is quite like the nature of a zombie – lifeless, often pedestrian, and mostly uninspired.

    This time around, I’d say COD is lower than mediocre. I absolutely encourage waiting for a price drop (unless you absolutely adore COD multiplayer/zombies).    … Expand
  9. Keitha313
    Jun 1, 2018
    4
    Just keeping the review short and sweet.
    P.S. don't listen to the positive reviews they're just having you on trust me!
    Graphically the game isn't anything special, for a triple A title that had 3 years to work on the game they really dropped the ball big time on this! Gameplay wise, it's your usual COD minus wall running, boost jumping which isn't a bad thing when the game actually    Just keeping the review short and sweet.
    P.S. don't listen to the positive reviews they're just having you on trust me!

    Graphically the game isn't anything special, for a triple A title that had 3 years to work on the game they really dropped the ball big time on this!

    Gameplay wise, it's your usual COD minus wall running, boost jumping which isn't a bad thing when the game actually works, yes, that's right the game runs like total crap!
    The game suffers from so many wtf moments of how did I die, why does my gun seem like its doing less damage than his and this isn't just me saying this I've seen big Youtuber/Twitch players say the exact same thing!
    The lack of proper servers and the problematic lag compensator really screw this game up couple all of that with the fact the game matches people from across the world to play in lobbies, seriously how is that even happening!!

    Authenticity next, do they deliver? HELL NO they don't! Guns have terrible fake animations, it's just incredibly lazy, for an example when you shoot one bullet from the KAR98k and you go to reload instead of putting a single bullet in the character puts an entire stripper clip into the gun and they even put an entire stripper clip into the gun when you only have 1 bullet left in reserve, it's just absolutely laughable!
    Guns have no recoil they all shoot like damn lasers, snipers are just a one-hit kill from any range which just makes them the total unskilled weapon of many peoples choice.

    Then zombies... oh my god!!
    Making something easier isn't making it better, the zombies are basically invisible, yes they run faster, but it's so damn easy to avoid them you can run through them essentially and the map complexity is nil, void, there is no complexity or teamwork required so props to Sledgehammer on that *slow clap*...

    Finally, the story, it's a good war experience it displays some epic moments, nice change up of gameplay requiring health packs instead of regenerating health, but the story is far too short and lacks the same storytelling level that Treyarch brought to such a high standard.

    Overall, It's maybe not as low as I scored it, but the game is such a huge let down that I had to score it this way, so much for a short and sweet review.    … Expand
  10. njja02
    Jun 17, 2018
    4
    Better than the last few CODs, but still pretty average. The campaign this time around was too over-the-top and repetitive for me. But the multiplayer did add one mode that I enjoyed; War. Plus the zombies was a bit better this time around. But it just didn't do much for me overall.
  11. BorderlineBunk
    Nov 7, 2017
    4
    I gave this game a 4 for the passable campaign and the barely adequate zombies mode, but GOD is multiplayer trash. I feel like I'm constantly playing this game in a state of lag where it feels like the same 4 bullets to kill take half the time for my enemies than it takes me. Its likely a result of their garbage peer to peer connectivity COD insists on implementing every game when gamesI gave this game a 4 for the passable campaign and the barely adequate zombies mode, but GOD is multiplayer trash. I feel like I'm constantly playing this game in a state of lag where it feels like the same 4 bullets to kill take half the time for my enemies than it takes me. Its likely a result of their garbage peer to peer connectivity COD insists on implementing every game when games like BF1 are just burying them in quality. This isn't even a Battlefield fanboy over here. I've been with COD since COD 2, but its blatantly obvious that they don't care about making a fun UNIQUE experience anymore and its just about **** on this years version of another subpar game. God just give up COD this is the nail in the coffin of the series for me. So done with their ****… Expand
  12. scruffy_77
    Nov 10, 2017
    4
    Sadly, this game was a real let down for me. Firstly, and to be fair the campaign was ok, just way to short. I did enjoy playing each section but before I knew it I was at the end within 5 hours of gameplay, £50 for five hours’ entertainment is not great value when you compare this to such titles as Horizon Zero Dawn, or the Witcher 3. But the real let down for me was the multiplayer, asSadly, this game was a real let down for me. Firstly, and to be fair the campaign was ok, just way to short. I did enjoy playing each section but before I knew it I was at the end within 5 hours of gameplay, £50 for five hours’ entertainment is not great value when you compare this to such titles as Horizon Zero Dawn, or the Witcher 3. But the real let down for me was the multiplayer, as an old school CoD fan who spent so much time on the likes of Modern Warfare 1 & 2, and black ops 1 I was excited for this back to the roots Call of Duty, but unfortunately my experience couldn’t be further from my nostalgic memories. To begin it didn’t work for a few days, just stuck at a loading screen, then when it did work my ping was so bad, I had no chance – this is despite being on a 250mbps connection. The maps are too small, and it just loads the same ones over and over again. The whole lobby thing I don’t get either – Just need a menu, and find match… Such a shame, I was overly looking forward to this game, and personally for me, they missed the target. But credit where credit is due, at least they have changed direction from the awful double jumping futuristic rubbish that the last few instalments followed.… Expand
  13. ApexCryptLord
    Nov 3, 2017
    4
    I must say the story is really great, it has some great missions and it has some really great moments. But tbh. the multiplayer is still not good as the old ones. What is really disappointing. And i don't really know, why CoD has a MMO mod?
  14. FluffyBunnyBro
    Mar 10, 2018
    4
    Call of Duty WWII is a solid game, though it has MANY flaws. But before we get to the heart and soul of the game, the multiplayer, lets talk about the campaign.

    THE CAMPAIGN: It's pretty good, one of the better in the series, and the first one I've actually played all the way through since BO2. This campaign is a lot of the same stuff, but it feels more engaging because of the WW2    Call of Duty WWII is a solid game, though it has MANY flaws. But before we get to the heart and soul of the game, the multiplayer, lets talk about the campaign.

    THE CAMPAIGN:
    It's pretty good, one of the better in the series, and the first one I've actually played all the way through since BO2. This campaign is a lot of the same stuff, but it feels more engaging because of the WW2 setting, and shooting Nazis with iconic WW2 guns was pretty cool. The characters were okay, they were a bit flat, but at least there was something here. They felt like flat characters, but they were still characters, which is more than I can say about some of the other games. Overall, it was a Call of Duty campaign, and if you enjoyed the other game's campaigns, you'll enjoy this one. If you're not a fan, I would still recommend trying it, as it makes some improvements I really like, like being able to request ammo, and meds from squad mates. It was pretty good for a CoD campaign, but nothing amazing.

    THE MULTIPLAYER:
    Oh, where do I start.
    First off, the good: The gameplay is fun, and it does feel more like the older Call of Dutys without the jetpacks and all that crap. It's pretty fast paced, but I found the gunplay pretty satisfying and the overall gameplay just pretty fun. Also, in this game they introduced a new mode, War, and put simply, its a blast. It's basically Battlefield's rush but in Call of Duty. You have to make it through a few objectives while the other team tries to stop you. I really like it, and hope to see it return in future titles. Yeah, so gameplay is pretty good.
    And now, the bad: This game had the WORST launch in all of CoD history. The first 2-3 days I couldn't even get into a multiplayer. It finally started working for me, but it's still a bit shaky, sometimes lagging, or taking longer than it should to find a match. Other people have been getting it worse than me, and apparently can't get into a match even now. This is unacceptable for a $60 AAA game. Also, Headquarters is an epic fail. Currently, it is impossible to get into headquarters with another player, which is the whole point. Your stuck wandering around by yourself. Some achievements even require you to do things with other players, which is hard to do WHEN THERE'S NO OTHER GODDAMN PLAYERS!!!! I also just hate the idea in general, I just wanna get into a game and shoot some dudes while blasting classic rock in the background (Please tell me I'm not the only one who does that). But I don't give a s*** about "Social Score" and doing stuff in the headquarters. Why not just put all that stuff in menus? Anyways, now that I've covered some launch issues, lets cover things about the game's fundamental mechanics. Divisions is a stupid system. When they said they were "going back to their roots" I didn't think they meant they were legit going back and removing some of the great innovative features of the recent CoDs. This system was a complete step back from the pick-10 system. If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Sledgehammer said this one would feature more customization than ever before, which is just a flat out lie. In fact, it''s the opposite of the truth. There's less customization options for your classes in this one.
    This game is also lacking some iconic WW2 weapons. For example. the Sten, it was promised before the game launched, but it's nowhere to be seen. The Mosin Nagant, perhaps the most iconic sniper of the war, is completely absent from the game. We're also missing the Gewehr 43. This game doesn't feature a revolver of any kind either, which is most perplexing of all. Revolvers are such an iconic part of any war, I don't see why they wouldn't bother to include one in the multiplayer. Especially because there's one featured briefly in the campaign. They programmed the model and all the animations but didn't put it in the multiplayer?
    And finally, black female Nazis. Just, why. NOBODY would have complained if women weren't in the game. It's almost disrespectful to all the men who fought and died in the war. Even more stupid, is that you couldn't play as a female soldier in Infinite Warfare, a game taking place a few hundred years in the future, in freaking space for crying out loud. Nope, no females in that but WW2, yup, put women in it. Wtf?
    And finally,

    THE ZOMBIES:
    I'm not a huge zombies fan but this one's okay.

    THE VERDICT:
    CoD WWII is a good change of pace, and a solid Call of Duty experience, but is plagued with launch issues and broken gameplay mechanics. If you're a huge Call of Duty fan, and was looking forward to this one, go ahead and buy it. If you're not really into Call of Duty and are on the fence, I might be a bit hesitant to spend $60 on it. 6/10. Solid WWII shooter, and a needed change of pace for Call of Duty.
    Edit: 5 months in and I'm done. Boring gameplay, terrible maps, I only have 30 characters left, but no replay value basically.    … Expand
  15. CaptainPuGDoG
    Nov 16, 2017
    4
    Spend 50+ hours
    Story 2/10 So stuipid history,where Great America try to win war,a lot of hero doing dont many actions don't make sense,just 2 or 3 interesting missions, all other is a ****
    Mp 5/10 After 10 or 15 hours,play it is very boring and there is not any interest
  16. bmc87
    Nov 4, 2017
    4
    Single player campaign is alright but nothing special. My biggest beef is the tired old graphics engine that looks basically the same as BO1. It's 2017, these graphics are unaccetable. I don't have a problem with twitch shooters or lack of realism but good lord, visually this game is not good.
  17. mikepatyaev
    Nov 17, 2017
    4
    Why the press is giving 85 to this crap? You irresponsible liars! You're lying to the poor people to buy this garbage. Once again we have the cruel politics who want to take all your money. All this practices are going to end the console industry. Did you see the boxes falling from the sky?
  18. Dog3117
    Nov 6, 2017
    4
    I was stuck between this game and wolfensetin 2, I ended up choosing this one hoping for the replay-ability/longevity factor. Made the cock up of choosing this. BS microtransactions, boring multiplayer, and all round scumbag business ethics by the publisher of this game. This game had a fairly enjoyable campaign, and I did appreciate the attempt and creativity of war mode but these are theI was stuck between this game and wolfensetin 2, I ended up choosing this one hoping for the replay-ability/longevity factor. Made the cock up of choosing this. BS microtransactions, boring multiplayer, and all round scumbag business ethics by the publisher of this game. This game had a fairly enjoyable campaign, and I did appreciate the attempt and creativity of war mode but these are the only 2 positives I see in an otherwise boring soulless cash grab of a 'game'. To y'all giving it a 1 or 0, quit being sheep and be honest, its not a genuine 1 and your the reason this site is nearly completely useless… Expand
  19. EvanGeistfeld
    Nov 3, 2017
    4
    The only thing that shines in the game is the Singleplayer. Hello Everyone and Welcome. I happened to get a lot of time in on the multiplayer and zombies, but for the singleplayer, well I could play that all day if I really wanted to. The graphics actually look realistic in the singleplayer more so than the multiplayer. This review though is only based on what I thought of the multiplayerThe only thing that shines in the game is the Singleplayer. Hello Everyone and Welcome. I happened to get a lot of time in on the multiplayer and zombies, but for the singleplayer, well I could play that all day if I really wanted to. The graphics actually look realistic in the singleplayer more so than the multiplayer. This review though is only based on what I thought of the multiplayer aspects and zombie mode. The multiplayer seems to be different for those who are used to jetpacks yatta yatta. We are heading back to WW2 and it feels nice for a change. I topped the leadboard on my first match with flame shotgun bullets. It was satisfying for sure. Although there is something that I do not like about this game, and it is the fact that they tried so hard to make this a game that would be played for hours on end, with amazing detail and what not. Unfortunately this game is not amazing and lacks a lot of graphical improvements and the optimization is just crap. I played on a 144hz monitor 2460 or 2K screen, with a 1080 graphics card and it didn't look all that great. The multiplayer is ok at best, but moving over to zombies, is just downright cringe worthy. The zombies look amazing art wise and their voices uncomfortable feeling which is great, but it just isn't as scary as we had hoped for the series. It has jump scares, but that is it. This Call of Duty, is by far an improvement for sure in some areas, but overall just isn't a game that I am interested diving more into. It was unfortunate because this was one of my anticipated game of this year, and it did not deliver to the hopes I thought it would bring.… Expand
  20. frederik1478
    Oct 19, 2021
    4
    This game could have been amazing but the set pieces and the constant taking control away leave you with a kind of nothing and boring feeling, har unskippable cutscenes which just takes the replay value ride out of it,
  21. BlakDak666
    Nov 6, 2017
    4
    Call of Duty has been a series that has struggled to stay relevant in recent years due to a shift in the futuristic styles that people have come to dislike and loathe. As a player to the franchise since COD4 and playing pretty much every COD since, I have absolute confidence in saying that this game is hot garbage and if this is the direction and attitude it has chosen, then I am trulyCall of Duty has been a series that has struggled to stay relevant in recent years due to a shift in the futuristic styles that people have come to dislike and loathe. As a player to the franchise since COD4 and playing pretty much every COD since, I have absolute confidence in saying that this game is hot garbage and if this is the direction and attitude it has chosen, then I am truly done with this series for good. I will breakdown the campaign, multiplayer and zombies and give my thoughts on them:

    Campaign - This is easily one of the worst COD campaigns and maybe even worse campaigns as a whole to a game I have ever played. Maybe this is because I'm a history major and researching WW2 as a teen but this genuine trash. The narrative struggles to be either a Band of Brothers style or a over the top action film you'd see from Michael Bay, with explosions and scenes of "loud explosion following ears ringing and dude pulling you on your feet" scattered in too many times. The characters are mostly cardboard cutouts that have no real personality, depth or weight to the situation and their abilities you use in combat are more frustrating and gimmicky than satisfying. The mission variety is typical COD design: boring shooting galleries of killing scores of people with little to no reaction, QTEs and gimmicky additions like tank and plane escorts that don't bring out the full potential it should. The authenticity of WW2 is pretty much trashed; it takes place in 1944-1945, which is invalidating most of the war (in which the first three CODs and World at War did correctly), the Allied forces are largely set aside for the American v.s. Nazis clash and more as gimmicky tokenism of cultures that disrespect their service (despite the opening clearly stating over 50 countries fought and left 65 million dead), characters don't act realistic to the situation, hitmarkers, retreading the same exact structure as other CODs before it. The climax and ending was forced and tonally out of place. It's trash and deserves no love and only scorn. I don't care that people only buy it for the multiplayer; if you put something in your game you want those players to play that in their game. Case closed. 3/10

    Multiplayer- Standard COD multiplayer with a WW2 skin. It wasn't like COD 2 or 3 had great multiplayers anyways, it was COD 4 that put COD on the map in the first place. The game modes are still the same, the division system is pointless as you can pick any gun you want anyways, war mode is weak on operations, the inclusion of PC friendly race and gender options instantly destroys any authenticity this game claims to have, a **** hub world copy and paste from Destiny, loot boxes that fall from the sky and promote gambling and skinner box mentality that is abhorrent and should be scorned deeply. I suppose if you play with friends there can be some fun to be had and it feels more grounded compared to the last entries, but it doesn't do anything new that is concerning and by my fifth match I was already bored and wanted to play something else. Also add connectivity issues at launch and you got a fine example of a rushed product. 4/10

    Zombies- Usually my favorite mode COD ever has and in some ways is the best to date. I like some of the changes made to the design of the game, but I unfortunately couldn't help to feel that it is too easy (as a vet of zombies since 2008). The characters aren't interesting and boring; their constant breathing and gasping becomes grating and annoying after awhile. The zombies themselves lose their dark charm quickly and their voicework makes them goofier than what should be (since I thought this was going to be a far more edgier zombies). Loot boxes in this mode is pointless and extremely ****. With it being easy and being able to get to high rounds with little challenge, I honestly felt bored and wall guns are just powerful as mystery box guns, completely making it pointless to use. The most disappointing part is each past zombies game (WAW and the Black Op series) had ideas that never got here despite being worth the inclusion. The human like models of WAW, the extra maps from BO1, the passive perks you get and the bank system in BO2 and gumballs in BO3 all could have been in this game, but isnt. The single map at launch is insulting and even with friends it can only last so long before you get bored. Decent overall. 6/10

    The game will have microtransactions, has a season pass and generally feels like 'another Call of Duty', no matter if it returns to its roots or not. I am sick and tired of this series, the greed behind it and the stupid masses (myself included) who buy these games anymore and pass it off as dudebro topics. I gave COD a chance and after a decade, it's time to throw in the towel for any hope for the series. COD definitely has found its roots, but to grow a big nasty parasite of a plant instead of the hopeful tree of originality and charm. 4/10 overall. DO NOT BUY THIS GAME.    … Expand
  22. mrjackthereaper
    Nov 3, 2017
    4
    The Graphics is fine but not enough for a AAA FPS game.

    Characters's face sometime look like not match with the emotion of the voice-over. No chacracter in the game are memorable even the developer make flashback scenes. the gameplay is boring, repeat over and over. Stealth mode look like a joke for this game, maybe they want to copy wolfenstein 2 perharp. The AI is super    The Graphics is fine but not enough for a AAA FPS game.

    Characters's face sometime look like not match with the emotion of the voice-over.

    No chacracter in the game are memorable even the developer make flashback scenes.

    the gameplay is boring, repeat over and over. Stealth mode look like a joke for this game, maybe they want to copy wolfenstein 2 perharp.

    The AI is super stupid and dull some time even play in regular mode.

    The developer still focus too much on Multiplayer more than Singleplayer. Campaign is short and no replay valuable.

    Multiplayer mode is fine but feel like copy battlefield 1 concept in some point.

    NAZI Zombie mode is simply copy treyach-style, boring and no reason to enjoy this.

    Server are still not working sometime.

    My Score: 4/10.

    ANOTHER DISSAPOINTMENT FROM ACTIVITION.    … Expand
  23. Joshinatir2200
    Nov 4, 2017
    4
    This game takes all of the problems from previous COD titles and amplifies them. Ridiculous wait times, button functions not working (this is fixable), etc. The campaign is very meh, multiplayer is very unmemorable, and the nazi zombies is boring after playing it once, even zombies in space land was better.. I can't believe I spent $60 on this junk. It's worth half that at most. MayThis game takes all of the problems from previous COD titles and amplifies them. Ridiculous wait times, button functions not working (this is fixable), etc. The campaign is very meh, multiplayer is very unmemorable, and the nazi zombies is boring after playing it once, even zombies in space land was better.. I can't believe I spent $60 on this junk. It's worth half that at most. May be the last COD game I ever buy.… Expand
  24. id_archer
    Nov 6, 2017
    4
    графоний растворился в мыльце...(( и чуство что я в это уже играл не как не покидает меня
  25. Hanbarku
    Nov 14, 2017
    4
    best call of duty in a long time. unfortunately loot boxes drop from the sky on the beaches of normandy no less. do they have any shame anymore. at least its cosmetic. 4/10. no more loot boxes
  26. parham76
    Nov 15, 2017
    4
    I wrote this review after attempting to play with a shotgun. I ran around a corner, fired into someone's head and didn't receive a hit marker before I was killed. A respawn later, I sprinted and rounded into someone who ran around a corner at the same time as myself, but somehow fired 4 shots before I could hit my trigger once. This is so bad because it makes the entire sub machineI wrote this review after attempting to play with a shotgun. I ran around a corner, fired into someone's head and didn't receive a hit marker before I was killed. A respawn later, I sprinted and rounded into someone who ran around a corner at the same time as myself, but somehow fired 4 shots before I could hit my trigger once. This is so bad because it makes the entire sub machine gun/shot gun classes unplayable for those with strong connections. I *have* to use long range assault rifles and even then, I *have* to be viewing down scope before someone is in sight to stand a chance. Ever wanted to know what it feels like to consistently prone down in a corner half covered by a wall waiting for someone to round a corner(not because you're a camper, but because you *have* to camp) and then when they do, they STILL manage to zoom down their scope at you and fire 3 shots before you get to fire one, and then in the replay that half second you saw them before being shot was actually a full 1-2 seconds? Then play this.… Expand
  27. 1983Electric
    Nov 22, 2017
    4
    Campaign player here. I felt like all the cool stories happened with World at War, and then they had to try and come up with other things that just weren't as interesting; too short. Also.. you play as a girl trying to deliver a briefcase for a level. The graphics were really nice though.
  28. BlueKetsueki
    Dec 8, 2017
    4
    Would only recommend to people who haven't played cod for a while, i can honestly say i have seen Fifa change more than cod the last few years which shows how stale it is wait for the modern warfare 2 remaster or buy an older cheaper better cod.
  29. monkey77
    Feb 11, 2018
    4
    now i have never played the game but all i am aware of is the poor map design, why is map design important you may ask, if the map you play is three lane garbage over and over again why would you play the map you wouldn't, almost every map in the game is three lanes three choices go middle go left go right, also unlike previous COD games they over use the invisible barriers i recall innow i have never played the game but all i am aware of is the poor map design, why is map design important you may ask, if the map you play is three lane garbage over and over again why would you play the map you wouldn't, almost every map in the game is three lanes three choices go middle go left go right, also unlike previous COD games they over use the invisible barriers i recall in black ops 2 that i could jump on what ever i wanted tanks cars ect, and if there were barriers they weren't that obvious or annoying, the game play is same old call of duty but more of a meat grinder where you die and the kill streaks are useless, in conclusion call of duty world war 2 is at best temporarily mediocre and will inevitably get repetitive. also microtransactions… Expand
  30. XxAlbertoBuzzxX
    Jun 2, 2020
    4
    CALL OF DUTY: WWII
    ........................................................
  31. Feels64
    Jan 10, 2021
    4
    This is just about the campaign..

    What I hate most about the campaign is how often it takes control away from you and puts you in these really clunky and stupid situations like QTE's. Why can't this just be a cutscene if it must be here? I just want to fight in the war, this stuff is so annoying. The only times I felt immersed were when it was pure combat. Pop out of cover, shoot,    This is just about the campaign..

    What I hate most about the campaign is how often it takes control away from you and puts you in these really clunky and stupid situations like QTE's. Why can't this just be a cutscene if it must be here? I just want to fight in the war, this stuff is so annoying.

    The only times I felt immersed were when it was pure combat. Pop out of cover, shoot, reload, dodge explosion, change cover. That's a fun gameplay loop. They try to stray from that so often, like they're afraid of it. It's so frustrating to get glimpses of what this game could be only for them to be interrupted with "GRAB THAT PANZERSHREK". If you don't do what they want you to, the AI willl scream it out over and over and over.

    The audo is also super messed up. Only 1 setting that controls all the audio. It's mixed terribly and you'll rarely even be able to hear dialogue. The bass overpowers everything else, completely drowns it all out.

    Some of the missions are so poorly designed. They spend so long on the scenery then lazily dump re-spawning AI all over. Very little care was put into making this game fun to play.

    The game ends in an extremely underwhelming way that is very obviously not what was originally intended. It feels very unfinished and this being the game that it is from the developers and publisher that it is from... It will never be finished.
    As that is the way of modern game design for AAA companies.
    Overall.. whatever. This game won't be remembered for any special reason. Extremely lazy and forgettable.    … Expand
  32. DOLLAR_376
    Jul 1, 2020
    4
    Mediocre game which is nothing like the old and good entries of the saga.

    - Campaign is short, cliched and disapointing, with few interesting missions. - Multiplayer is boring and destroyed by the good old microtransactions, loot boxes, and in game store. To make it all better, now you can open your lootbox at the Omaha beach, which is kinda depressing. - Zombies is the most decent    Mediocre game which is nothing like the old and good entries of the saga.

    - Campaign is short, cliched and disapointing, with few interesting missions.
    - Multiplayer is boring and destroyed by the good old microtransactions, loot boxes, and in game store. To make it all better, now you can open your lootbox at the Omaha beach, which is kinda depressing.
    - Zombies is the most decent mode, but gets repetitive quickly, with new additions made via DLC.

    Overall, another disapointing entry in the saga that is not even worth half of its retail price.    … Expand
  33. N-_
    Jul 6, 2018
    4
    The voice in this game yells at you that you have to do the missions: "conquer the bunker!" and "defend the bridge!".... I don't really like that.
    And the game goes a bit to fast for me....
  34. InternetPerson1
    Oct 25, 2018
    4
    This game is basically everything wrong with most shooters today. Its all style over substance. Sure this is Call of Duty so of course the game is visually very impressive and the controlling and shooting feels great but this game is filled with little to no spark of creativity or emotion and a lot of greed. The campaign is fun with the great cinematic moments and the some charmingThis game is basically everything wrong with most shooters today. Its all style over substance. Sure this is Call of Duty so of course the game is visually very impressive and the controlling and shooting feels great but this game is filled with little to no spark of creativity or emotion and a lot of greed. The campaign is fun with the great cinematic moments and the some charming characters. it has a lot of fun moments and the new game play with having squad mates add flare to the game. However it plays it too safe and the story is generic and way too short. Some good but mostly forgettable. The multiplayer has some cool ideas like the HQ and the new division system but the maps, score-streaks, and mostly everything feels very meh. However the loot boxes and crates re using items is beyond scummy and just flat out dumb. The zombies is overly complicated with all these diffrnet perks and "load outs" and the map is confusing. This game does nothing new but the same old tired tropes in modern games.… Expand
  35. Coop123
    Jan 22, 2019
    4
    This was my first ever experience with a Call of Duty game. I must say i was not very impressed and quite disappointed. This game is basically everything we have come to expect in modern generic first person shooters. The game is amazing looking however and the graphics are top notch. The shading, the environments and lighting are all great. The sound of basically everything as well isThis was my first ever experience with a Call of Duty game. I must say i was not very impressed and quite disappointed. This game is basically everything we have come to expect in modern generic first person shooters. The game is amazing looking however and the graphics are top notch. The shading, the environments and lighting are all great. The sound of basically everything as well is great. The base game-play at its core is very well polished. The shooting feels perfect and movement is smooth. The campaign has some likable characters but the story is so generic and short making investment useless. Its well acted and sometimes actually well written but its so predictable and the everything feels so forced in so it can be condensed into a few hours. The game-play is standard corridor shooting and can get very old but the squad dynamic and having teammates supply you with health and ammo adds much needed depth. The vehicle sections feel under utilized and out of place. The game does switch it up sometimes and has some very cool moments but overall very average. The multiplayer however is a disaster. The maps are super small and force you into the same approach every time. They all feel very similar and generic. The weapons are good however and pretty diverse and feel good to use. Customization is lacking with certain divisions locking off certain things. Score streaks feel very unrewarding and useless and make the multiplayer feel very empty. The hub area has some cool things like playing old Activision games and one versus one duels. Mostly its a glorified loot box show room though. The cosmetic loot system is so lazy and broken that items are literally reused with different names. The cosmetics do not fit with the WWII setting and break any possible immersion. Zombies has some cool horror aspects and a cool atmosphere but the positives end there. The map is convoluted and annoying to navigate. Enemy variation is lacking and many things are made to complicated like the horrible perk system and power ups. Overall a very underwhelming experience.… Expand
  36. lmtz1618
    Feb 27, 2019
    4
    WWII is tolerable, sometimes. Sledgehammer hits similar but somehow worse notes than Advanced Warfare. War mode was the highlight, maybe only because of my parallel infatuation with Overwatch at the time. Zombies did nothing for me, and I don't remember the campaign. Sledgehammer basically bring only bad things to the code of a Call of Duty gunfight. The gunplay feels empty andWWII is tolerable, sometimes. Sledgehammer hits similar but somehow worse notes than Advanced Warfare. War mode was the highlight, maybe only because of my parallel infatuation with Overwatch at the time. Zombies did nothing for me, and I don't remember the campaign. Sledgehammer basically bring only bad things to the code of a Call of Duty gunfight. The gunplay feels empty and unsatisfying. The maps are not good, and are visually, quite possibly the worst of any COD I've played. (Since Modern Warfare 2) I also cannot shake the negative feeling the yearly release model places on this franchise. An attempt at a Call of Duty that ranges from barely tolerable and impossibly mediocre to bad, no good, and no fun.… Expand
  37. Codboy_07
    May 28, 2020
    4
    Horrible maps, bad gun balancing, garbage story mode. I got the game for free from ps plus and even then it is worthless. Cod modern warfare is a better game. This game does nothing new except add a destiny style hub with horrible lootboxes with garbage, recycled loot
  38. Ba-Ouai-Logic
    Jun 29, 2020
    4
    By the americans, for the americans. If I had to describe the game in one word, I would say "America". America lost around 350k soldiers during this war, but it's strange and I wonder why this game didn't tell me a single word about the URSS army that won this war, entered Berlin firstly and lost about 23.5 millions of people...
  39. Gleb0n
    Aug 6, 2020
    4
    A very short game about the Second World War. The plot consists in one thing: Either kill everyone, or blow up something. A lot of bugs and stupid NPCs. In short, the game has failed. 4/10.
  40. Greek_objektife
    Jun 9, 2021
    4
    Понтенциальное возвращение к истокам провалили под частую,сюжет пресный,мультиплеер говнище и геймплей в синглплеере говнище полное плюс сеттинг второй мировой войны превратили в комедию
  41. miamifinsboom_1
    Feb 8, 2021
    4
    I think its really over hated i loved the campaign zombies is also really good the mutiplayer ehh i think thats where peolpe are pissed with the game but 7/10
  42. Kramerllama
    Nov 21, 2017
    3
    Let's preface this with the fact that the last Call of Duty game I picked up and played quite a bit of was Modern Warfare 3. After that game I lost interest in the series as I began to hate the direction the series was starting to go to. I didn't pick up or play any of the jetpack games, Ghosts through Infinite Warfare, as it finally looked like Call of Duty lost its way, and what theLet's preface this with the fact that the last Call of Duty game I picked up and played quite a bit of was Modern Warfare 3. After that game I lost interest in the series as I began to hate the direction the series was starting to go to. I didn't pick up or play any of the jetpack games, Ghosts through Infinite Warfare, as it finally looked like Call of Duty lost its way, and what the series was initially about.

    When WWII was announced I was a little excited that they were going back to boots on the ground, going back to WWII, and going back to the series roots. Though I was skeptical, and became a little disappointed in some of the features they were implementing, or blatantly ripping off from other games, I still decided to pick the game up on launch day to play it, and hopefully get that same feeling I had when I played CoD 2, 3 and WaW. Sadly, this game is probably one of the worst, if not the worst Call of Duty game I have played.

    To break it down:

    Weapons -
    Dont even bother using any of the other guns unless its the STG 44 or BAR, as silent SMGs dominate in this game. They are great in CQC, and can outgun nearly any sniper rifle, LMG, or typical
    semi auto rifles at medium and long range. STG and BAR have nearly 0 recoil, and again can out shoot any of the other weapons at medium to long range. Don't bother with the shotguns unless you run with the incendiary rounds loaded as even nearly point blank, shotguns are a 2 hit kill.

    Maps -
    These are probably the worst maps in Call of Duty history. Every map is a chokepoint meat grinder. It's you're typical 3 lane map, but there's no tactics involved. They become a meat grinder as they are poorly designed. Maps are filled with clutter, no flanking routes, terrible spawns, and they are easy to spawn camp on. Unless you like to die over and over and over due to campers camping your spawn, you'll probably not enjoy these maps.

    Matchmaking-
    The matchmaking in the game is equally as terrible as anything else. You'll constantly be put on teams filled with the worst players in the game, as the enemy team is stacked with above average and good players, which just results in a steam roll for the enemy team.

    Gameplay-
    This game is filled with players hopping around like Master Chief, and dropping down onto their bellies to drop shot you. Due to all the clutter on the maps, you'll get everyone headglitching behind an object.

    Zombies-
    Zombies in WaW was fun. It was addicting. Zombies in WWII is utterly boring. Played 1 online round of Zombies, got to level 30+ and everytime I died or go downed, I was praying the game would be over. I was that bored of it. I was bored of the game by level 15. It was just too easy to advance. I never felt threatened by the zombies at all. It was just boring.

    This game is just utter crap. It is probably the worst Call of Duty that I have played. I was hoping that when they said they were going back to boots on the ground, they were going back to Call of Duty 2, one of, if not the best game in the franchise, but with modern tech. Nope. This game feels like it was made in 2006. Unbalanced weapons, matches, poorly designed maps, which look like one of the developers toddlers designed them, horrible lag, and matchmaking, and ultimately just a poorly developed game. The fact that this game took 3 years to make is astonishing as it looks like they did everything in 6 months. Wait, Call of Duty 3 was developed in 8 months, and was a better developed game than WWII. There was no sense of accomplishment when you do well, no satisfaction when you kill an enemy who was besting you the whole match, no sense of pride as you rank up yourself, your division or your weapon. I was extremely disappointed with the game, and I didn't have a lot of expectations coming into it. If you want to play a good WWII game, play any of the older Call of Duty games. Play Medal of Honor Frontlines/Rising Sun/Airbourne/Allied Assault, they will all give you a better experience in a WWII setting, and online, and be a whole lot more fun than this game.

    The only thing that is redeemable in WWII is the new War mode. That is the only redeeming factor in the game. Even then, there's only 3 maps, which get old fast. If you want to waste $60 on this game, I won't stop you, but I will warn you I wouldn't spend $20 on it.    … Expand
  43. vangoat
    Nov 5, 2017
    3
    I am not recommending this game to my friends.

    I got it thursday night...and couldn't play it because servers were down, yay. Played some friday morning had some fun. Played saturday with my friend very sporadically because we were both continually being kicked form servers. Zombies was awesome, feels just like the best of the the old zombies. What I played of campaign was decent.    I am not recommending this game to my friends.

    I got it thursday night...and couldn't play it because servers were down, yay. Played some friday morning had some fun. Played saturday with my friend very sporadically because we were both continually being kicked form servers. Zombies was awesome, feels just like the best of the the old zombies. What I played of campaign was decent. Multiplayer tho...it sucks. War is great. The rest tho, is just like other reviewers say, very empty. Absolutely terrible spawns...how many times did I spawn in to immediately (seriously seconds later) be killed by the same exact person! OMG!

    Its just so spastic of a game, all reflexes, no thinking. Quick-scoping!? really? Why keep that in these games!? I watched one play of the game where a sniper quick-scoped two people from 12 feet away! So stupid. Campers absolutely galore! Campers and quickscopers will love this game.

    It is a much better installment of COD, BUT everything that ever annoyed me about old COD games is still present. And the servers are absolute garbage so good luck not getting errored out. I would think game companies would be better prepared for releasing games than this...why run a beta if you cant even properly release a working game? Cant they figure out how stressed their servers will be by how many freaking preorders they had?!?! obviously not...very disappointed. Theres a good chance this is the last COD I will play.

    I really wanted to like this game. I will play it some more. But today was Sunday, I woke up did some chores and played games most of the day, but did not once feel inclined to play COD WW2. 2 days after having it and I already was losing interest. That sums it up for me. I would love my 60 bucks back.    … Expand
  44. Lukestrn
    Nov 26, 2017
    3
    This was such a great chance to turn things around for the COD developers. Unfortunately, multiplayer is still comparable to chickens running around with their heads cut off. Spawn, die, repeat. Maps are average at best. Weapons are fun (not that futuristic BS). Multiplayer would have been much, much better if the maps were larger and thus slowing the pace of the game. A game of TDM takesThis was such a great chance to turn things around for the COD developers. Unfortunately, multiplayer is still comparable to chickens running around with their heads cut off. Spawn, die, repeat. Maps are average at best. Weapons are fun (not that futuristic BS). Multiplayer would have been much, much better if the maps were larger and thus slowing the pace of the game. A game of TDM takes 5 minutes when it should be closer to 15. No penalizations for kids leaving every time their team starts losing. I guess it doesn't matter what the community thinks anyways because the kids are going to keep buying this garbage and feeding developers money for being lazy. Load times for logging in, interface, and maps are laughable. I'm not even going to bring up the loot boxes.. This is a problem that will continue until gamers come together and boycott the developers (especially EA) who employ these microtransactions.… Expand
  45. Gurdur
    Dec 11, 2017
    3
    Back to basics? I think not. This game continues in the same wrong direction the series has taken since MW2 (which is the last really good COD game in my opinion). The maps are too small, players spawn behind you all the time, and there is no real tactical aspect to the game anymore. You can't plan your moves, find good sniping spots and/or outsmart players. It is all about reflexBack to basics? I think not. This game continues in the same wrong direction the series has taken since MW2 (which is the last really good COD game in my opinion). The maps are too small, players spawn behind you all the time, and there is no real tactical aspect to the game anymore. You can't plan your moves, find good sniping spots and/or outsmart players. It is all about reflex shooting.

    I really don't understand why the developers have gone in this direction. Maybe it is to differentiate themselves from BF. Either way, the COD series has become a joke to serious gamers. I will not buy the next title.

    So if you like a fast paced fps where the only real skill needed is quick reactions, then this game is for you. If not, stay away.    … Expand
  46. trival
    Oct 21, 2020
    3
    just **** ... single play camp sucks hard. dumb missions historically innacurate.
  47. AJY84
    Dec 6, 2022
    3
    Fantastic looking and sounding. As far as gameplay goes, your guns apparently shoot confetti and not bullets. I sniped the AI during the campaign, in the neck, twice, and they simply shrugged it off. Takes nearly 12-14 bullets from a Thompson to down an enemy, and this is on recruit difficulty. Heroic actions are beyond buggy. Last one I attempted, I was unable to move in any direction andFantastic looking and sounding. As far as gameplay goes, your guns apparently shoot confetti and not bullets. I sniped the AI during the campaign, in the neck, twice, and they simply shrugged it off. Takes nearly 12-14 bullets from a Thompson to down an enemy, and this is on recruit difficulty. Heroic actions are beyond buggy. Last one I attempted, I was unable to move in any direction and the game decided to checkpoint save when the downed ally only had about 15% health left.… Expand
  48. mackenzie129
    Nov 9, 2017
    3
    Read before you downvote
    I hate that I'm going to get down-voted to hell for rating it so low, But honestly lets be real I'm a call of duty fan boy bought it every release. I try to be fair to games never rating them in red unless they are broken or a rip off. I like many people bought it on the psn store so no tax yay...but now i cannot return it boo..... A lot of people my dumbass    Read before you downvote
    I hate that I'm going to get down-voted to hell for rating it so low, But honestly lets be real I'm a call of duty fan boy bought it every release. I try to be fair to games never rating them in red unless they are broken or a rip off. I like many people bought it on the psn store so no tax yay...but now i cannot return it boo..... A lot of people my dumbass included thought it'd be W.a.W2 (It is not)

    Pros
    -Campaign is good return to form
    -Zombies is fun
    -WW2
    -Graphically it inst shiet
    -When your team actually works together War mode is fun
    -Headquarters is neat

    Cons
    -Multiplayer is broken (Spawns, Finding matches, Contracts, Guns)
    -Multiplayer maps are honestly ****
    -Campaign can easily be beaten in one sitting
    -Zombies is overly convoluted
    -Multiplayer is unbelievably broken
    -BS deaths in the campaign

    I don't care about the supply drops they are in every game seriously if you're rating it low for that shut the **** up. The playing as black people and women in the MP who ****ing cares, The iron crosses in Campaign who cares?! Yeah I wouldve liked it if the Nazi army had swastikas but whatever its no bother. Fan boys accept that its not perfect get off the 10s Haters accept that its a game out there that people enjoy get off your 0s. So much hype so much disappointment.
    When they fix the actual broken things my rating will go up    … Expand
  49. Ungodly_Phantom
    Jan 26, 2018
    3
    Таки добрался я до этого "шедевра". Начнем по порядку. С первых минут компании мне сразу стало понятно, что игра ориентирована на американский ПАЦРИОТАФ. Все тот же тир с болванчиками-фрицами и бравыми американскими героями. Сюжет унылый,скучный и предсказуемый. 4 из 10
    Сетевая игра это просто пиздец, и любители этого кгворят что в бф1 скучно? Повсюду кемпера, ваншотающие мины-растяжки,    Таки добрался я до этого "шедевра". Начнем по порядку. С первых минут компании мне сразу стало понятно, что игра ориентирована на американский ПАЦРИОТАФ. Все тот же тир с болванчиками-фрицами и бравыми американскими героями. Сюжет унылый,скучный и предсказуемый. 4 из 10
    Сетевая игра это просто пиздец, и любители этого кгворят что в бф1 скучно? Повсюду кемпера, ваншотающие мины-растяжки, нулевой баланс оружия и баллистика, ужасный геймдизайн карт. Тошнотворный сетевой режим. Ужасно долгий поиск матча без возможности выбора нескольких режимов под поиск. У бравого американского десантника с сверхжёсткой подготовкой выносливости хватает на 3(!!!!!) секунды бега!!!!Один из худших сетевых шутеров на моей памяти 0 из 10
    Зомби-режим. Оставалась надежда на зомби-режим, и он, на фоне остального более менее играбелен. 5 из 10
    Вывод: Очень посредсвенный тир, с ужасным сетевым режимом, 30 часов жизни выкинул в пустую. Настоятельно рекомендую обходить данную игру стороной.
    БФ1 просто на 10 голов выше этого, имхо    … Expand
  50. riverkev95
    Nov 3, 2017
    3
    Una correcta decisión regresar al multiplayer clásico y a una historia mas acorde a la saga tras el gran fiasco de COD: Infinite Warfare, por lo cual en ese apartado mejora bastante, aunque cabe resaltar que la historia pudo haberse aprovechado de mejor manera siendo "la segunda guerra mundial" y el multiplayer corre muy bien pero el desbalance que genera el matchmaking entre gente queUna correcta decisión regresar al multiplayer clásico y a una historia mas acorde a la saga tras el gran fiasco de COD: Infinite Warfare, por lo cual en ese apartado mejora bastante, aunque cabe resaltar que la historia pudo haberse aprovechado de mejor manera siendo "la segunda guerra mundial" y el multiplayer corre muy bien pero el desbalance que genera el matchmaking entre gente que paga por mejores armas con la gente que juega sin pagar mas por el videojuego es terrible.
    A pesar de sus puntos positivos anteriormente descritos, lo que mas choca en este juego es el hecho de que se hayan implementado todas las políticas mas nefastas que existen actualmente en el mundo de los videojuegos, aprovechandose así de su inmensa base de usuarios fieles a la saga.
    Entre estas políticas nefastas puedo mencionar que el juego viene recortado de lanzamiento (Prueba de esto es el DLC ya anunciado para enero de 2018), las lootboxes que están tan de moda en casi todos los videojuegos pero en este juego son implementadas de una forma mas descarada ya que tú puedes ver como los otros jugadores reciben sus premios tras comprar una cajita de estas, esto va acorde al matchmaking que relacione jugadores que no han gastado dinero extra en el videojuego con personas que gastan un montón y por lo tanto consiguen mejores armas en tu cara, lo cual provoca un online totalmente desbalanceado, por no decir que roto.
    En conclusión, este juego mejora algunos aspectos del juego del año anterior, pero la forma tan descarada en que Activision gana dinero de sus usuarios en este juego no me deja ponerle una mejor nota que "3".    … Expand
  51. xismius
    Nov 4, 2017
    3
    El juego no está mal pero el problema más gordo ahora de lanzamiento es que no se puede ni jugar de la cantidad de bugs que hay sobretodo con el tema de la conectividad, el juego ahora mismo está roto, por lo demás yo lo veo un juego bastante decente, no diré de los mejores de la saga, pero pasable e infinitamente superior a los anteriores aunque eso tampoco es muy difícil viendo el nivelEl juego no está mal pero el problema más gordo ahora de lanzamiento es que no se puede ni jugar de la cantidad de bugs que hay sobretodo con el tema de la conectividad, el juego ahora mismo está roto, por lo demás yo lo veo un juego bastante decente, no diré de los mejores de la saga, pero pasable e infinitamente superior a los anteriores aunque eso tampoco es muy difícil viendo el nivel de los ultimos años.… Expand
  52. mrcrunch08
    Nov 3, 2017
    3
    I don't get the hype and high reviews. Level layout in mp is pretty crap and controls are clunky. It feels like a big step back and oddly feels older and worse than cod remastered. The campaign is good and looks great but is short as usual. It's just the mp that is a huge let down. My guy constantly stops running for no reason resulting in my guy standing still or slowly walking into aI don't get the hype and high reviews. Level layout in mp is pretty crap and controls are clunky. It feels like a big step back and oddly feels older and worse than cod remastered. The campaign is good and looks great but is short as usual. It's just the mp that is a huge let down. My guy constantly stops running for no reason resulting in my guy standing still or slowly walking into a bullet. The majority of the maps seem to have no effort at all put in to them. It blows my mind that some people think this is better than infinite. There is nothing at all new or exciting here. Just a slow paced, clunky fps with mediocre mp. It doesn't even come close to cods of old and shouldn't even be allowed to sit on a shelf next to bf1.… Expand
  53. metasebii
    Nov 3, 2017
    3
    I'm a totally neutral FPS player and have enjoyed both COD and BF in the past. After playing BF1 for the last year or so, switching to this felt like playing a game from the 90s. There is simply no realism in the mechanics, the history, or even the sound effects. I felt zero immersion when playing this game. I was seriously hyped about this title, more than I have been about any other forI'm a totally neutral FPS player and have enjoyed both COD and BF in the past. After playing BF1 for the last year or so, switching to this felt like playing a game from the 90s. There is simply no realism in the mechanics, the history, or even the sound effects. I felt zero immersion when playing this game. I was seriously hyped about this title, more than I have been about any other for a long time, and I was severely disappointed. After playing the game both in campaign and online for a couple of hours, I am going to return it today.

    More than disappointing — this is just a bad game.    … Expand
  54. Mikedee
    Nov 4, 2017
    3
    Campaign is great. Zombies good. Multiplayer horrible. Cod ww2 is a AAA game that is treated like a free-to-play game except you pay full price for a game and then to compete you have to buy supply drops. Never again will I support these guys until they quit with the cash grab.
  55. Fabulous_Filou
    Nov 5, 2017
    3
    So... first time Review. This game is probably the worst in the Series and I really regret to have bought it. The cmpaign is just a really big pain. It's so unaccurate its not even funny. Russian guns in the Normandy, in under three minutes is Omaha Beach taken (it took about half an hour until they arrived at the bunkers in reality, even Medal Of Honor did this right 15 Years ago). ThatSo... first time Review. This game is probably the worst in the Series and I really regret to have bought it. The cmpaign is just a really big pain. It's so unaccurate its not even funny. Russian guns in the Normandy, in under three minutes is Omaha Beach taken (it took about half an hour until they arrived at the bunkers in reality, even Medal Of Honor did this right 15 Years ago). That was the first Mission. Okay, it was okay, I didn't expect much but it got worse. The driving parts are so fast, its like playing Need For Speed. And then the tankdriving... Horrible, especialy when my little Sherman with his short 75mm gun takes out multiple Panzer 4s and a freaking Kingtiger... What a laugh! Over alll it was a really nice showcase of how freaking great the americans where and that they won the war ALONE. Well, no... for me it's just bitter how they try to tell this story. I am german and yes, my great grandfathers fought in this terrible war. I know a lot about it. The Story forgot the Brits and Canadians, even on the overview Map there where no signs of them, STUPID. The resistance part of the game was a bit new and gave a new perspective but here was also nearly everything wrong. First i thought the Voiceacting was cool, all Germans speak perfekt german and the conversations made sense but then there was this one offizier that name i forgot... He spokes very bad german with a stupid acsent... and the game lost me once again. So the unrealistic story went on and I played through.... but then there was the part i was most disappointed: The scene at the end with the KZ... Just some random buildings, two hanging copses, some corpses on the ground... nothing really shocking nd tht is the problem. If yo visit a real memorial site of a KZ and you read all the history and look at the pictures you can't sleep for days, thats how horrific it really is and this game needet to tell this story better, more shocking. But no, it looks like a random prison with some people who might have died. Seriously? The developers didn't take the time for research, everything is wrong about it. The Bunkers, the Tanks, the Soldiers, the Weapons... I've been even to france, I know how it should look like.
    But CoD isn't really about the campaign, right? So what about the Multiplayer. Well... It's standart, the Wa Mode is fun but nothing really new. I wish i could wright more about it, but the last three days where just a pain in the you know where. Server problems, buggy HQ, Lootboxes disappering. Nothing really works and thats all AFTER closed and open Beta. so no... nothing to be proud of right now.
    But there's a Zombiemode. And yes, it's fun, but not for so long. pretty standart, too.
    Overall this game is screwed and no recomandation at all!
    Battlefield 1 did so much right last year. The campaign was great, Told many storyyys and you cared about the characters. The multiplayeer WORKED and was fun, too.    … Expand
  56. Aresman
    Nov 5, 2017
    3
    I got this game for the SP campaign, but after finishing it in less then 6 h, i can't recommend this game not even on sale at how mediocre the missions were the single mission that i enjoyed and was good from the begging to the end was the Battle of Bulge but even on that the map was almost a copy and paste from united offensive, i wish there was more idk, i mean the D-Day mission onlyI got this game for the SP campaign, but after finishing it in less then 6 h, i can't recommend this game not even on sale at how mediocre the missions were the single mission that i enjoyed and was good from the begging to the end was the Battle of Bulge but even on that the map was almost a copy and paste from united offensive, i wish there was more idk, i mean the D-Day mission only the begging is epic after that all u do is clear bunkers but the way it looks and it's made makes me thing they had a very limited and small budget to make that mission and they wasted too much on the first part and after that they reused same bunker over and over with little change to it and it's things like that that makes the campaign boring and dull, idk how a game that's 12 y old is more epic has more awesome action and bigger then this but idk maybe it's just my opinion and blind by nostalgia, i hope i am.… Expand
  57. Cuberian
    Nov 6, 2017
    3
    You really need an explanation? You saw this black soldier in Germany army in multiplayer ?! No, because it looks like I'm looking through the eyes of myopic
  58. BrutallyHnstGmr
    Nov 27, 2017
    3
    I created an account, just for this game. Wow, I don't know what game the "real" reviewers are playing, but I'm glad that a site like this allows for players opinions, because for the most part, the players are right. MULTI-PLAYER REVIEW ONLY: I also want to get it off my chest that shame on the developers for trying to erase history by censoring the swastika, the biggest Nazi symbolI created an account, just for this game. Wow, I don't know what game the "real" reviewers are playing, but I'm glad that a site like this allows for players opinions, because for the most part, the players are right. MULTI-PLAYER REVIEW ONLY: I also want to get it off my chest that shame on the developers for trying to erase history by censoring the swastika, the biggest Nazi symbol there is. Everybody knows what it is and what it represents but it's still a part of history and if you are going to make a WWII game, regardless, you should probably leave it in.

    This game feels like a mistake. My bet is that Sledgehammer was going to make Advanced Warfare 2, and after Battlefield One's success and the fans hatred for COD in space, decided to scrap the work they had done on AW2 and rushed through this mess of a game. That's the best I can sum this up, as a rushed mess. I will disclose that I am a very big fan of Advanced Warfare, to date it's my favorite COD, I'm also a huge fan of Battlefield One, so grounded action is perfectly fine. This game cannot hold a candle to BF1, it's like comparing a Chevy to a Ferrari. HINT: Call of Duty is the Chevy.

    Graphically, this game is definitely a step back, both myself and my wife commented on how much worse it looks, almost like a PS3 game. From the character models to the boring and generic maps, oh and small maps. But as any seasoned gamer knows, graphics aren't everything, so let's move on.

    Sound: I typically give games of today a pass given the quality that exists with audio. gunfire is gunfire, bomb blast is bomb blast, nothing special, nothing spectacular. The sounds of burning humans is pretty comical though. The issue though is if you actually compare this game to Battlefield One, you can see the significant difference between the two companies and games, if you've never played BF1, then the audio is fine.

    Game play: Well, it's not terrible, it's back to basics, but it's still just mindless run and gun. I read one "professional" review that stated it brought strategy back to the series, what?? No there is no strategy, it's just mindless run and gun, which isn't necessarily a bad thing. Everything so far feels responsive, and though server matchmaking is an issue, when in game, it seems everything works fine. My biggest problem with COD, which has just gotten worse with WWII, is the quick scope sniping bull****. How do I know it's worse, let me tell you how, and you don't even need to watch the kill cams to see people completely missing people and getting kills. My wife, is terrible at video games, but she loves them, and tries to play them. One thing she could not do on any game, either COD or BF1, is snipe. Well, guess what, the sniper rifle is her favorite gun in WWII because of the lack of needing to be accurate. I've watched her, and I've watched the kill cam, it seems there is a hit box around the player, so that as long as your bullet lands within the box, it registers a hit. This is total garbage, and when the really good players figure this out, which they have, it makes some matches completely unplayable, the cannon map. There's no skill, you don't need to time shots, you just scope and pull trigger at the same time, dead. The game modes themselves look like all the same stuff, with the exception of War, but I can't comment on that because I haven't played that yet. There's not that many weapons and getting exotic weapons seems pointless because unless I'm missing something, they do not do anything to increase the stats of the actual weapon, just add like 10x exp or some Zombie kill perk thing. The class system is fine, no complaint there, just be careful when changing weapons, do not change weapon classes under a class, change the entire class. For example, if you have the shot gun class but want to use a machine gun, don't change the shotgun to a machine gun, you lose your incendiary rounds per, instead make a infantry load out.

    Overall: I like it better than Black Ops III, which was returned to the store the next day, at least this one hasn't been returned. It's not nearly as fun as Advanced Warfare. If you want a really good shooter, pass this one up and get Battlefield 1. EA has to be laughing all the way to the bank, every time Activision releases a new COD game, it just makes their game look all the much better.

    UPDATE: It's been returned to the store.    … Expand
  59. PolleDK
    Nov 7, 2017
    3
    Once again the Cod franchise disappoints.....
    the game has amazing graphics and starts out really awesome, but after some short time the game just keeps coming up with RANDOM encounter of German soldiers that fight to the dead the 1 sec and surrender the next. the first mission has more action packed in the whole mission than the whole game of Modern warfare 2 and it makes it dull.. and    Once again the Cod franchise disappoints.....
    the game has amazing graphics and starts out really awesome, but after some short time the game just keeps coming up with RANDOM encounter of German soldiers that fight to the dead the 1 sec and surrender the next. the first mission has more action packed in the whole mission than the whole game of Modern warfare 2 and it makes it dull.. and to make it a lot worse the main story Glorifies the American Perverted vision on themselves in WW 2
    And whats up with all this STRONG independent Woman in games now a days!??! i can understand the women in the resistance but in the British special forces??? give me a break from all this feminist ****    … Expand
  60. evani
    Nov 8, 2017
    3
    if you care at all about multiplayer then do not buy this cod, 9 maps 4 of which are decent the rest are average at best! the game play is also terrible combined with minimal gun management and perk customization, possibly the worst CoD MP i have ever played.
  61. Sikver91
    Nov 8, 2017
    3
    una literal mierda de juego ahora con sus cajitas y sin emocion en el multijugador no hay miedo a morir, cheaters y hacks por todo lado servidores caidos un juego de una nota por ahy de 3 por mucho a 4 y esta en 8 ? es una broma ? que basura de juego
  62. Jcupps12
    Nov 10, 2017
    3
    I can’t believe all the people praising the graphics. They are a huge turn off for me especially after seeing how good battlefield 1 looked 2 years ago they are a complete embarrassment. Online time to kill is ridiculously fast. Doesn’t matter what gun you use as recoil is no existent and again time to kill is so fast regardless it’s rarely noticeable the damage differences of weaponsI can’t believe all the people praising the graphics. They are a huge turn off for me especially after seeing how good battlefield 1 looked 2 years ago they are a complete embarrassment. Online time to kill is ridiculously fast. Doesn’t matter what gun you use as recoil is no existent and again time to kill is so fast regardless it’s rarely noticeable the damage differences of weapons unless the suppressor is attached. Sniping is essentially just everyone quick scoping. The sound design is actually fairly good but would ay I mainly noticed it on grenades and explosives. Gun sounds are better in bf1. Game play is better in bf1. Loot boxes.....I mean really? It’s fun to hop on play 3 or 4 games and then move on. Campaign is short, boring, and doesn’t seem to matter to be honest. Glad it’s back to boots on the ground but it is miles and miles and miles away from being a great game or recapturing what call of duty once was. Put simply, it’s just not very good.… Expand
  63. beardedwarrior1
    Nov 12, 2017
    3
    A good solid base, completely and utterly ruined by dreadful programming, connections and server issues. After putting a solid 20+hours into the game, around 5 in single player and 15+ in multiplayer I can honestly say "save your money", i'm quite regretting purchasing the game myself. When the game is fun, it is great (Mainly when playing with friends), however, it constantly disconnectsA good solid base, completely and utterly ruined by dreadful programming, connections and server issues. After putting a solid 20+hours into the game, around 5 in single player and 15+ in multiplayer I can honestly say "save your money", i'm quite regretting purchasing the game myself. When the game is fun, it is great (Mainly when playing with friends), however, it constantly disconnects you from your party, from games, halfway through games, when the game ends, when the game begins. Gives you loading screens that last in excess of 20 minutes. Black screens that you can not back out of, therefore making you reset the game completely. No dedicated servers. No host migration (it simply ends the game if the host leaves). Completely empty HQ thanks to **** connections, so you cant complete some of the challenges e.g. give 50 commendations to other players. The game is shipped out with the bare minimum when it comes to maps and variation, probably waiting to release more maps via season pass (as if we didn't realise Activision is money hungry already). The maps they give us are very poorly designed and thought out, because playing as a black, female Nazi in the London Docks was somehow going to make sense. In the last 2 hours of gameplay alone I have been disconnected/kicked/black screen'd at least 17 times. Party members have been thrown into random games not with the party and if that wasn't infuriating enough when we joined the game, the remaining 3 party members where split 2/1 on the teams, fantastic right?

    Honestly, if you are REALLY interested in the single player campaign (which lasts maybe 5 hours) then wait for a sale and then get it, or at best lend/rent it from somewhere. This game is not worth the £49 asking price. Not by a long shot, unless they get their fingers out their ass and fix the myriad of problems it currently has.    … Expand
  64. Uglytruck
    Nov 21, 2017
    3
    I've had a long history with COD... I'm done... I play MP and nothing else and what this franchise has become is - MEH. It has surfaced that rather than matchmaking, the netcode guys would rather "inject" random lag across all players. Over time, this shouldn't affect your K/D, but it is just wrong on so many levels. The objective is to give one player a lag advantage along with anI've had a long history with COD... I'm done... I play MP and nothing else and what this franchise has become is - MEH. It has surfaced that rather than matchmaking, the netcode guys would rather "inject" random lag across all players. Over time, this shouldn't affect your K/D, but it is just wrong on so many levels. The objective is to give one player a lag advantage along with an emotional/mental high to keep coming back when they have a match go 17-5 in their favor. Not unlike a drug dealer. Where does it leave the casually good to exceptional player? They don't care and now I don't care. Every game since the original black ops has had this with some varying degree. How many times have you played on a team with one of these games and wonder how the majority of everyone went negative? It's there. Group this up with an anemic number of maps and some of the series worst score streaks, you've got a really boring game. I don't feel compelled to play it - I often forget that I have it. I'm sure not "buying" anything on it. The sad thing is, they'll promote a redux of MW2 when they realize no one is playing or buying it, but they'll do it with the same awful netcode like they did with MWR. This is why the series is dead. Your skill or desire to build a skill-set doesn't mean anything to them.… Expand
  65. Tscolaro1
    Nov 27, 2017
    3
    I was cautious about buying this game because it has been clear to me that Activision is one of the companies that has been generally horrible towards their customers in recent years. Against my gut feeling, I purchased this and found exactly what I should have expected. COD WWII feels as if it was thrown together with little care because they knew that this game would sell well becauseI was cautious about buying this game because it has been clear to me that Activision is one of the companies that has been generally horrible towards their customers in recent years. Against my gut feeling, I purchased this and found exactly what I should have expected. COD WWII feels as if it was thrown together with little care because they knew that this game would sell well because the words Call of Duty are in the title.

    Overall, I liked the single player a lot, that is this game's saving grace. I actually feel as if this was one of the better campaigns of the past few years. The multiplayer feels as if they threw $20 into a usb drive and are now trying to run the entire multiplayer servers through that. It is appalling how poorly the servers have been since the launch nearly a month ago and I have seen no signs of it getting better. The zombies was alright, I think that the new zombies games need to tone it down a little, but that's just personal preference.

    Overall, definitely a waste of $60.    … Expand
  66. LightPoth
    Jan 23, 2018
    3
    Call Of Duty: WW|| is quite lacking when you start to get into the game and play more. The Multiplayer has little to no maps for the general player, Zombies is a rip off from Treyarch's and has no replay-ability after a weeks worth of playing.
  67. M_Hjalmers
    Apr 5, 2019
    3
    I wanted to really like and enjoy this game, but it doesn't cut it for me. The campaign was good though 8/10. When ever I try this game I find my self going back to Cod Infinite Warfare, that game is so much better on all fronts in my opinion with the only exception that you can't save your custom game settings (???). I paid 80$ for this and I really regret it :/
  68. PixelGamer115
    Oct 24, 2020
    3
    - Campaign: 2/10
    - Zombies: 5/10
    - Multiplayer: 3/10

    .....................
  69. Chicoloco
    Jun 19, 2020
    3
    COD mechanics are still good but there are two major problems in this game:
    1 - The campaign is not that fun. It would be nice to have the Eastern front, for example, like in COD World at War.
    2 - We play always in the same maps in multiplayer. If we want more maps, it costs a fortune (something like 50 bucks). It's not acceptable.
  70. TBDSkripted
    May 21, 2020
    3
    Straight Garbage. Hours of time spent in this game and there is nothing to bring me to keep grinding. The game was doomed from the start with the “Lootboxes” oh sorry I mean Supply Drops! No spoilers ahead but don’t even bother with the Campaign, it’s a waist of time to be honest. The weapons are god awful! Why even include weapons from the other powers like Italy, Russia and Japan whenStraight Garbage. Hours of time spent in this game and there is nothing to bring me to keep grinding. The game was doomed from the start with the “Lootboxes” oh sorry I mean Supply Drops! No spoilers ahead but don’t even bother with the Campaign, it’s a waist of time to be honest. The weapons are god awful! Why even include weapons from the other powers like Italy, Russia and Japan when the factions aren’t in the game! Maps are alright the only good one it seems is Gustav Cannon. All the maps in the game(Non DLC) get boring quick. The addition of Shipment 1944 made it worse with all the Camping and fire shotguns. I’ve never really been a fan of Zombies but this just makes me want to never even start playing zombies. The game is not worth the money.… Expand
  71. brodaty_borsuq
    Jul 26, 2020
    3
    Campain only:
    I've played it for about 1 hour. Turned it off and naver came back.
  72. StormHair
    Apr 7, 2021
    3
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Aunque no soy la mayor fan de los juegos en primera persona, las campañas en sí me han parecido entretenidas técnicamente. Sin más, pero ok. Al menos he podido afinar más mi puntería de sniper.

    Narrativamente, en cambio... ¡Ay, amiga! Decir que narrativamente es flojo se queda corto por mucho. Tenía unas expectativas inmensas en este juego: como fan de la IIGM, esperaba poder explorar la guerra hasta sus extremos. Cuando de repente me han salido los créditos (que, mind you, duran más que el juego en sí), me he puesto lívida. ¿Dónde está la captura de Berlín? ¿Y el frente ruso? ¿Y el enfrentamiento con Japón? **** ¿qué clase de visión parcial guarripei de un conflicto tan inmenso me he comido? *himno americano sueña de fondo* *bostezos en la sala* *se oye a alguien vomitando en los baños fuera*

    Eso por no hablar de la historia de Daniels, que, por tradicional y redundante, me aburría cada vez que se hacía referencia a ella... Ya que te pones a hacer un juego de esto, hazlo bien. ¡Dame personajes que me importen, carajo! En dos días me voy a haber olvidado de estos cinco como si nunca hubiera jugado. ¡Menos zombies nazis y más profundidad!    … Expand
  73. Muur
    Apr 9, 2021
    3
    The story line is kind of a joke to be honest.. I wasn't able to connect to characters and feel the game. Map designs are sometimes good and sometimes really bad. I've been playing FPS games for 7 years now this is probably the worst Call of Duty I've ever played. Your teammates just shoot around randomly, they don't kill any enemies mostly. Not so much bugs but I have experienced a gameThe story line is kind of a joke to be honest.. I wasn't able to connect to characters and feel the game. Map designs are sometimes good and sometimes really bad. I've been playing FPS games for 7 years now this is probably the worst Call of Duty I've ever played. Your teammates just shoot around randomly, they don't kill any enemies mostly. Not so much bugs but I have experienced a game breaking one on "Collateral Damage" mission. If you're buying this game for It's story It's not worth it. Even online doesn't worth it. I recommend buying other CoD games instead of this.… Expand
  74. MaxieZeus
    Sep 20, 2022
    3
    Same **** with a ww2 skin, gun-play doesn't feel any different from other games and they didn't even try to make this game historically accurate.
  75. CommonSenseGuy
    Nov 3, 2017
    2
    I've only played this game for like 4 hours, but I've had to restart it about 20 times because I keep getting errors. I'm not a big COD fan, but I bought the game to play with a few friends. Meeting my expectations shouldn't have been difficult, but this experience has been worse than I could ever imagine. 80% of this game has been about actually trying to play it. The other 20% isI've only played this game for like 4 hours, but I've had to restart it about 20 times because I keep getting errors. I'm not a big COD fan, but I bought the game to play with a few friends. Meeting my expectations shouldn't have been difficult, but this experience has been worse than I could ever imagine. 80% of this game has been about actually trying to play it. The other 20% is actually playing the game. The game itself, when I can actually play it, isn't bad. I haven't touched the campaign because, like I mentioned before, I only bought this to play online multiplayer with my loved ones. I'm willing to change my review score if Sledgehammer can patch things up so I can actually play the game that I bought. I only ask that I can go 10 minutes without an error popping up. An error literally just showed up as I was typing this review. I'm not even joking. Kill me… Expand
  76. Seifer706
    Nov 3, 2017
    2
    This game is horrible. Literally the only redeeming quality is parts of the campaign but even then it is one of the shortest campaigns in CoD history and still does nothing compared to CoD4/MW2/WaW/BO1/BO2.

    The MP... good lord is it horrible... guns lack any authenticity and are completely reskins (Tommy gun is literally the ASM-1 of AW). Returning the moment I leave work.
  77. ManOfChap
    Nov 17, 2017
    2
    "BOOTS ON THE GROUND" what a load of nonsense. This is another copy and paste CoD game. Campaign is absolutely awful. Zombies is decent but 1 map is not worth it. MP is lacking and the EXACT SAME for years now.
  78. TechMarine
    Nov 26, 2017
    2
    What a huge waste of money. Should be called Connection Off Duty. Multiplayer is entirely dependent on who has the minutely better connection. Maps are TINY and 6v6 boring roflstomps. Does nothing great for the franchise except Zombies. Hope I can get 30 bucks for this **** on aftermarket.
  79. Zukku
    Jul 11, 2020
    2
    What a terrible game. What a sad return to WW2. I actually enjoy the campaigns of COD games - this is the first that i just find totally unplayable. Bad characters, the worst quick-time-events i've ever seen, arcade-style shooting and the most boring story.
  80. REAPER007
    Nov 22, 2017
    2
    F***ing trash. Nothing else to add. Every goddamn year Activision profits on CoD series without making ANYTHING TO IMPROVE IT SOMEHOW. Since the Modern Warfare came out in 2007 the devs have changed absolutely NOTHING (well, besides zombies mode which is improving a bit with every game and the mp mode in Black Ops 2). A complete disaster and lack of any ideas lead to this - a big pile ofF***ing trash. Nothing else to add. Every goddamn year Activision profits on CoD series without making ANYTHING TO IMPROVE IT SOMEHOW. Since the Modern Warfare came out in 2007 the devs have changed absolutely NOTHING (well, besides zombies mode which is improving a bit with every game and the mp mode in Black Ops 2). A complete disaster and lack of any ideas lead to this - a big pile of ten year old excrement with a scent of WW2 piss. And then they demand 50$ for this. Amen CoD, you are dead to me!… Expand
  81. Matttappen
    Nov 10, 2017
    2
    By far, the worst call of duty ive ever played. Just terrible in all aspects. I was actually kind of excited about this game but it was such a huge dissapointment. The zombies is okay. If i were to rate the zombie game mode by itself id give it a 6.5. But the multiplayer is honestly terrible.
  82. mrsalty101
    Nov 4, 2017
    2
    Why is everyone so pissed about the 85 rating from the critics. I don't feel bad for the kids that fall for it and play this like it's the best thing ever. I feel bad for the parents that didn't block their kid's accounts from spending, because you know those idiots are buying loot boxes galore.
  83. Quijote
    Nov 3, 2017
    2
    Why the press is giving 85 to this crap? You irresponsible liars! You're lying to the poor people to buy this garbage. Once again we have the cruel politics who want to take all your money. All this practices are going to end the console industry. Did you see the boxes falling from the sky?
  84. kinlopunim
    Nov 3, 2017
    2
    instead of being the trendsetter, Activision has forced CoD to just borrow what it liked from other shooters. it's mostly battlefield and rainbow six siege. frustratingly long load times also hinder enjoyment. the hub world is wholly unnecessary and is mostly just used for the loot box thing, (where other players can see what you get in the loot boxes). good visuals don't make up for badlyinstead of being the trendsetter, Activision has forced CoD to just borrow what it liked from other shooters. it's mostly battlefield and rainbow six siege. frustratingly long load times also hinder enjoyment. the hub world is wholly unnecessary and is mostly just used for the loot box thing, (where other players can see what you get in the loot boxes). good visuals don't make up for badly copied game mechanics.… Expand
  85. pina
    Nov 4, 2017
    2
    I bought it yesterday since it was back to the roots, but it went literally back to the roots. They forgot that we're in 2017 and not in 2007. This game is SO poor: graphics are nowhere as it should be on today's consoles, animations are the same as 10 years ago, explosives are poorly done and the indestructible and hidden borders of the environment is something retarded.

    That's because    I bought it yesterday since it was back to the roots, but it went literally back to the roots. They forgot that we're in 2017 and not in 2007. This game is SO poor: graphics are nowhere as it should be on today's consoles, animations are the same as 10 years ago, explosives are poorly done and the indestructible and hidden borders of the environment is something retarded.

    That's because of the old engine from the beginning of the franchise. They just 'modified' it but the basics remain the same. The download package is 70GB (!!!!), all of which is bloatware. We're not talking about ultra HD graphics are heavy renedering for next gen consoles.

    The gameplay in multiplayer is very arcade, very fast and it's like I'm playing against and with bots. They all move so jerky. Shooting mechanics are poorly done, it doesn't feel right, it's all too fast. After a MP round, it takes ages and ages before a new game starts and you have to stare five minutes at the scoreboard without any possiblity to go to another screen.

    What's great? The unlockables, the perks and kill cams are still great and something to play for. But the gaming experience is so so so poor and it's painful to see how the gaming press keep giving it high scores. Perhaps it's because of the Campaign Mode, which I'm not interested in.

    But the whole game experience and above all, the game mechanics are retarded and outdated. This is a game for PS3, not for current gen consoles. Once again, you should be ashamed Activision to support publishing a cheap rip off of this franchise. IW or Sledgehammer MUST create a new engine for this game.

    This is like like playing FIFA 07 on a PS4 in 2017.    … Expand
  86. Rembo
    Nov 4, 2017
    2
    Sorry for my english. How do dear critics of various gaming editions put this game 9-10 points? Are you crazy? "Apparently, they got a good salary from the creators of the game." There is nothing interesting in this game! The BLACK OPS series is 10 points! Missing confidence in the ratings of critics! Only users' opinions can be trusted!
  87. Defalc0
    Nov 5, 2017
    2
    Multiplayer is a joke, such a bad joke. To hell with PC culture and its influence. Women (portrayed WAY out of context) , LGBT flags, and furries. what in the hell is this. Player customization is tolerable, but where is AXIS customization??? The allies have some cool uniforms. BUT we only get to customize our player to use for only 50% of our playtime?!!! who the heck thought that wasMultiplayer is a joke, such a bad joke. To hell with PC culture and its influence. Women (portrayed WAY out of context) , LGBT flags, and furries. what in the hell is this. Player customization is tolerable, but where is AXIS customization??? The allies have some cool uniforms. BUT we only get to customize our player to use for only 50% of our playtime?!!! who the heck thought that was ok? the helmets that all players can equip look ridiculous when they are on german soldiers... because they are american GI helmets. ive never played such an immersion breaking (WW2) game. I never have wrote a review on here, but this game pushed all the wrong buttons with me.Seriously, how is World at War STILL a superior game in this day and age. OH YEA, because it wasnt afraid to make you feel uncomfortable, it wasnt afraid to make you uneasy. That game still gives me chills, so dark and so gruesome. Thats the image of war that haunts me. one day this pandering needs to stop.

    The standard issue calling cards DO NOT include flags of nations that actualy faught in the war, instead we have to swallow the image of these LGBT my little furrie flags flying over Normandy. GOD ALMIGHTY, stop with this political **** you are literally killing yourselves with this stuff sledge...
    If i could go back in time only once, I would stop sledgehammer games from ever being part of the call of duty cycle.

    im giving this game 2 points because zombies is actually good, and might only play that.    … Expand
  88. Smoda
    Nov 9, 2017
    2
    When this game works it's great but it never works. There are constant disconnects and issues with lobbies and matches. Many times your progress does not get recorded and you can't complete the daily and weekly objectives. Even when you do not get disconnected you still do not always see your wins recorded. Constant lag makes many matches unplayable for all but a few players in the lobby.When this game works it's great but it never works. There are constant disconnects and issues with lobbies and matches. Many times your progress does not get recorded and you can't complete the daily and weekly objectives. Even when you do not get disconnected you still do not always see your wins recorded. Constant lag makes many matches unplayable for all but a few players in the lobby. There are many signs of laziness in this game and it feels like a cash grab.… Expand
  89. willsmichael964
    Nov 9, 2017
    2
    Let me start by saying that I 'am a 34 year old die hard gamer. I have owned systems and played games that some may have never seen or even heard of. Games have been a major part of my life since I was a child throwing tantrums over Thrillas Surf and Safari. I have played many COD titles and always at least tried to remain a loyalist. It wasn't until the N64 era that I really dug into theLet me start by saying that I 'am a 34 year old die hard gamer. I have owned systems and played games that some may have never seen or even heard of. Games have been a major part of my life since I was a child throwing tantrums over Thrillas Surf and Safari. I have played many COD titles and always at least tried to remain a loyalist. It wasn't until the N64 era that I really dug into the FPS genre with classic titles like Goldeneye and Perfect Dark. Call of Duty launched (many years later), and wow what a fantastic beginning to a franchise! Epic multiplayer and short yet powerful campaigns. It almost seemed like it would never stop either, every year a new COD would launch and it was a must have! Suddenly it seemed like it started to falter. It went from a perspective I understood to double jumping and running along the walls; flying through the air with jet packs.. Needless to say I wasn't much of a fan and only bought the new franchise titles when they were on sale or at a killer discount. Even then... After playing Ghosts, I realized the franchise had completely fallen into disarray and I converted my attention more into the battlefield franchise. I played Infinite Warfare with a friend and almost couldn't physically do it. Another COD failure. I should have known better. Then alas! A "boots on the ground" Call of Duty! Could this be a rebirth of a once great franchise!? Could this be another great title; reminiscent of the original Black Ops 1?? How exciting! I had to go out and get it on launch day! Nov 3rd! I had high hopes and hadn't bought a COD title in years. I dove right into multiplayer and tested every available weapon I could. It had a renewed feeling and I was excited. For 20 minutes. Then the endorphins settled and I took note to aspects of the game that became more evident. Like why do I keep playing the same 2 or 3 maps over and over? why is everyone running around with SMGs? Why is every map so small and contained? I quickly started to feel like I spent 59.99 for a few hours of enjoyment, and that afterwards, this game would sit on the shelf with the dozen or so other titles I have that rarely played in the last 6 months or so, and as I sit here typing, that is where CODWW2 sits. In the case, on my shelf, next to The Wolf Among Us. I anticipate that is where it will stay, while Battlefield 1 sits pretty in my Playstation. Mark my words, this WILL be the last COD game that I purchase, and I implore you to not make the same mistake that I did. Now I sit, eagerly awaiting the next Battlefield installment, but even if that takes years, Battlefield 1 will still satisfy me more than CODWW2 ever could.… Expand
  90. millerjr9566
    Nov 10, 2017
    2
    Seriously? Small maps, even for CoD standards. But my biggest complaint has to be the servers/connection. From playing EVERY single other CoD online, I have never had this many issues before. Complete trash, and I've never written a single game review in 15 years of gaming. Congrats on being that bad. You're right up there with that P.O.S. grinding for nothing Destiny game. The onlySeriously? Small maps, even for CoD standards. But my biggest complaint has to be the servers/connection. From playing EVERY single other CoD online, I have never had this many issues before. Complete trash, and I've never written a single game review in 15 years of gaming. Congrats on being that bad. You're right up there with that P.O.S. grinding for nothing Destiny game. The only positive outcome of this game was they got rid of those exo-skeleton jet packs.… Expand
  91. pappm94
    Nov 15, 2017
    2
    This is just a very very average first person shooter, that Activision releases every damn year. It is recycled, which is not a good word in the gaming industry. On top of that, microtransactions, of course.
    Just please don't buy ....
  92. BlackAndWhite
    Nov 24, 2017
    2
    Before I list the pros and cons I want to say that this review is not based on me being bitter or being a "hater" or any of that crap. I got my kill/death ratio to around 2.6 so I'm a lot better than the average player. This is an honest review.

    Pros: ▪Not a bad campaign but not great either. ▪Graphics are good in the campaign and average in multi-player. ▪Footsteps are easily    Before I list the pros and cons I want to say that this review is not based on me being bitter or being a "hater" or any of that crap. I got my kill/death ratio to around 2.6 so I'm a lot better than the average player. This is an honest review.

    Pros:

    ▪Not a bad campaign but not great either.
    ▪Graphics are good in the campaign and average in multi-player.
    ▪Footsteps are easily heard unlike MW Remastered.
    ▪ I personally like the new HQ instead of just sitting looking at a lobby screen. Pretty cool how you can look around and interact with different things.

    Cons:
    ▪Team balancing is horrendously poor. I played around 100 games and was on the team full of clueless morons about 75% of the time. A lot of games were not close at all, too one-sided.
    ▪The game lags quite often and has caused me multiple deaths (Not my connection as every other multi-player game is fine).
    ▪There is something massively wrong in multi-player. In many 1 v 1 gunfights where on my screen we (Me and an opponent) see eachother at the same time and I shoot first, get about 10 bullets into my opponent and he picks his **** gun up whilst being shot and drops me in 2 bullets. I watch the killcam and somehow he was already shooting me before I even lifted my gun up?? He had taken no damage either WTF??! Absolute joke.
    ▪Loot crates should not be in any game ever unless the game was free maybe. People already paid £50+ for the game and these greedy developers aren't satisfied and want more money for doing nothing basically.
    ▪Perk system/Division is just stupid in my opinion as it restricts you. If you don't want to show up on the enemy UAV then you have to use the Mountain division. You may also want to resupply from dead enemies.. Nope! Sorry, you can't have both as resupplying is in another division. So dumb. Should have just had normal perks as usual.
    ▪The maps are absolute garbage except 3. The other 6 are just painful to play. The inept developers had very little imagination when designing them. Only 9 **** maps in the base game is absolutely pathetic as well. The war game mode has its own 2-3 unique maps but that gamemode is pretty poor anyway.
    ▪They are copying off Battlefield with the Bayonet charge, War mode etc.
    ▪Gameplay is too fast paced.. everyone runs around like they are **** Olympic athletes on steroids. Why can't the game just be a bit slower paced??
    ▪Guns have basically no recoil making it very easy for terrible scrubs to shoot you from 40 yards with an SMG, laughable.
    ▪No-scoping and quick-scoping is too easy. Something else that caters to the 10 year olds who think they are pros, Jesus Christ.
    ▪You die a bit too quickly. Well.. I do at least. On my screen I am killed instantly but when I shoot enemies it sometimes takes 15 bullets and that's without missing.
    ▪The community is absolutely cancerous. Sitting in windows or behind objects head-glitching, sitting in corners, drop-shotting etc etc. This is not the developers fault obviously but it is another reason not to buy this trash.

    I could be on all day with the cons so I will just end it there. I give it a 2/10. Just absolutely terrible. The amount of **** which happens in multi-player is just mind-boggling. I almost smashed my controller on 10 seperate occasions. It's depressing thinking how great CoD used to be. WaW, BO1 were just brilliant. This **** doesn't come close to either. This is 100% the last CoD I ever, ever purchase. Deleted the game. Good **** riddance.    … Expand
  93. Hourless
    Jan 1, 2018
    2
    Pros:

    -World War 2 setting -Competitive Multiplayer has it's moments I guess Cons: -Same mechanics for the past few games, felt like the only change was the World War 2 setting -BORING coop zombie mode, high priced game that only produces ONE map and you can imagine it gets boring and repetitive very quickly. I honestly preferred the coop in COD: Ghosts. -Generic WW2 single    Pros:

    -World War 2 setting
    -Competitive Multiplayer has it's moments I guess

    Cons:

    -Same mechanics for the past few games, felt like the only change was the World War 2 setting
    -BORING coop zombie mode, high priced game that only produces ONE map and you can imagine it gets boring and repetitive very quickly. I honestly preferred the coop in COD: Ghosts.
    -Generic WW2 single player campaign, it's been covered so many times by different games it's hard to get excited
    -Outdated graphics, graphics look pretty much the same as COD: Ghosts were
    -Expensive DLCs to come, you would think the game is expensive enough as it is but wait there's more!
    -Just a twitch shooter, honestly most guns lack any kind of real feel behind them.    … Expand
  94. andrewcarey7
    Dec 3, 2017
    2
    Maps are garbage - they have no structure and the gameplay quickly falls into a mess of no strategy especially on objective game modes. The hit detection is extremely poor; 1v1 gunfights are horribly inconsistent. This game was pretty much my last chance for COD. Will be selling this game
  95. UltraVIbe
    Dec 26, 2017
    2
    COD WWll is a complete mess. You can pick out the bad things all damn day from the Gun loadouts and variety (COD WW1 had more weapons) to the maps being completely laid out the same and bland maps. The maps in multiplayer doesn't just feel that they lack variety of where to go but all the maps have a 3-laned way from each side. And the loot boxes. When are we ever going to get rid of thisCOD WWll is a complete mess. You can pick out the bad things all damn day from the Gun loadouts and variety (COD WW1 had more weapons) to the maps being completely laid out the same and bland maps. The maps in multiplayer doesn't just feel that they lack variety of where to go but all the maps have a 3-laned way from each side. And the loot boxes. When are we ever going to get rid of this means of marketing that always cycles and repeats. Everytime you ask for a loot box it gives you the same thing such as grips that you cant even look at ingame to Emotes that look all the same with different titles and rarity. COD WWll Zombies Stripped out some features that it was known for as well. Like the music that you get from the box and is now replaced with... well nothing (there is no recognizable sound). It hardly takes any sort of means to actually come up with a strategy anymore because all you have to do is run and gun then hopefully you get that OP gun that the Zombie mode gives you FOR FREE!!! The one thing I actually feel is sorta well done is the campian. It might have a couple of flaw from there to there but the campian does offer a variety of missions with different playstyles (unlike multiplayer)… Expand
  96. joker41187
    Feb 13, 2018
    2
    Wow this is a bad game, online is fun enough... But the campaign mode is the cheesiest most unrealistic waste of cinematics. The gameplay is fun enough. I am done with the call of Duty franchise...
  97. Physastra
    Apr 21, 2018
    2
    This game is complete trash, probably the worst cod game ever created. All the hype scores were for week one when everyone was blinded by botg.. it is unforgivable the scores that people have given this game just because it doesn’t have jet packs. The maps are terrible, the divisions system is way too restrictive, the score streaks are boring. Everything about the game is bland, boringThis game is complete trash, probably the worst cod game ever created. All the hype scores were for week one when everyone was blinded by botg.. it is unforgivable the scores that people have given this game just because it doesn’t have jet packs. The maps are terrible, the divisions system is way too restrictive, the score streaks are boring. Everything about the game is bland, boring and ordinary. Don’t buy it unless you know what you’re getting into.… Expand
  98. ifeelit
    Jul 2, 2018
    2
    - cliche camapign story. Never onced cared for a single character like I did in BO and MW

    - MP maps suck. Too small, Too cluttered, objects purposly placed to block view and every room has 92 open windows and hallways leading to you always getting shot from behind. One map in this game should be the size of all current maps combined - The MP system sucks, too many perks that never    - cliche camapign story. Never onced cared for a single character like I did in BO and MW

    - MP maps suck. Too small, Too cluttered, objects purposly placed to block view and every room has 92 open windows and hallways leading to you always getting shot from behind. One map in this game should be the size of all current maps combined

    - The MP system sucks, too many perks that never get used and the kill streaks are actually boring. Along with that, it takes too long to unlock what you want with the skin you favor being locked behind a loot crate. I quit the game only after playing it off and on for 4 months and i only collected maybe 15% of the stuff that I actually wanted.

    - the game, installed and played from disc with all the updates, was taking up 60gb on the my harddrive (for such a contentless game)

    - No soul in this game whatsoever.    … Expand
  99. Camman12
    Dec 10, 2018
    2
    To be honest, it has it's fun moments, but that can be said for any Call of Duty game. I have never felt so board and upset to a Call of Duty game and this one made the list. The multiplayer is just awful, maps are a three lane system that keeps getting repeated, lackluster customization to classes, supply drops that give you nothing but trash, and hardly any fun game modes. The campaignTo be honest, it has it's fun moments, but that can be said for any Call of Duty game. I have never felt so board and upset to a Call of Duty game and this one made the list. The multiplayer is just awful, maps are a three lane system that keeps getting repeated, lackluster customization to classes, supply drops that give you nothing but trash, and hardly any fun game modes. The campaign is really good and is the only saving grace for this game, but it fell into a hole of trying to play it safe and have a World War 2 generic story. Zombies I thought would be fun, but I was wrong. It's just so bad I only played one map and didn't even bother with the other maps because it felt boring and stale whiten a few matches and it's even more disappointing when this gamemode is not meant for solo players and made more for co-op. 2/10 a Call of Duty you shouldn't waste your money on because it's boring and you don't get your money's worth out of it.… Expand
  100. oBeSeMoDeo
    Oct 27, 2019
    2
    This game had so many problems for 6 months of its life cycle. It lost its player base before it even became the full product. Horrible management from the developers.
prev
Page:

Awards & Rankings

82
#82 Best PS4 Game of 2017
9
#9 Most Discussed PS4 Game of 2017
9
#9 Most Shared PS4 Game of 2017

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
79

Generally favorable reviews - based on 83 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 62 out of 83
  2. Mixed: 21 out of 83
  3. Negative: 0 out of 83
  1. CD-Action
    Jan 10, 2018
    70
    I really wanted CoD’s return to World War II to be something more than a solid game – but it’s not. I couldn’t shake the feeling that I’ve already seen all this, that the developers (or perhaps the publisher) chose to create something as safe as possible. There’s just one campaign mission that surprised me with its scale, the rest is just a disappointing “best of Call of Duty”. The multiplayer is as good as usual, but it was infused with unnecessary systems resembling mobile titles, e.g spending in-game currency on pointless tasks of the “kill 100 enemies” variety. Missions that make you watch other players open their loot boxes are the pinnacle of absurdity. [13/2017, p.64]
  2. The Digital Fix
    Dec 22, 2017
    70
    A solid return to its roots, Call of Duty WWII reminds us what made us all fall in love Call of Duty in the first place. It ticks all the boxes which is both a blessing and a curse. Good fun and worth your time but offers nothing exceptional.
    Read full review
  3. Playstation Official Magazine UK
    Dec 15, 2017
    90
    Revitalised and exemplary FPS gaming. Multiplayer trims back to the essentials, campaign shows sensitivity and Zombies...well it's a new excuse to play CoD Zombies. [Christmas 2017, p.77]
See all critic reviews »