Call of Duty: WWII

 PlayStation 4
User Score
5.1

Mixed or average reviews- based on 2065 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 718 out of 2065
  2. Mixed: 482 out of 2065
  3. Negative: 865 out of 2065
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. philsom
    Jun 15, 2023
    0
    Best COD in a long time when it released. Multiplayer is great and story mode too. Great soundtrack, sound design and amazing graphics.
  2. Concas
    Jun 8, 2023
    0
    Multigiocatore brutto e squilibrato, pieno di infognati che la vita sociale manco la conoscono. I fucili di precisione hanno praticamente l’automira, mentre per le altre armi i colpi non entrano. Spero che la smettano di pubblicare sti obbrobri
  3. KevMustLive
    Jan 4, 2023
    0
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. stupid tank, the worst parte of the game and the granades doesnt kill the enemies,… Expand
  4. AJY84
    Dec 6, 2022
    3
    Fantastic looking and sounding. As far as gameplay goes, your guns apparently shoot confetti and not bullets. I sniped the AI during the campaign, in the neck, twice, and they simply shrugged it off. Takes nearly 12-14 bullets from a Thompson to down an enemy, and this is on recruit difficulty. Heroic actions are beyond buggy. Last one I attempted, I was unable to move in any direction andFantastic looking and sounding. As far as gameplay goes, your guns apparently shoot confetti and not bullets. I sniped the AI during the campaign, in the neck, twice, and they simply shrugged it off. Takes nearly 12-14 bullets from a Thompson to down an enemy, and this is on recruit difficulty. Heroic actions are beyond buggy. Last one I attempted, I was unable to move in any direction and the game decided to checkpoint save when the downed ally only had about 15% health left.… Expand
  5. MaxieZeus
    Sep 20, 2022
    3
    Same **** with a ww2 skin, gun-play doesn't feel any different from other games and they didn't even try to make this game historically accurate.
  6. StudentCritic20
    Mar 26, 2022
    2
    Got this game from my PS+ subscription and still feel cheated/scammed. They story was so boring by the third mission, I had just removed it from my console. The game was a cash grab more than a return to the roots claim they made.
  7. frederik1478
    Oct 19, 2021
    4
    This game could have been amazing but the set pieces and the constant taking control away leave you with a kind of nothing and boring feeling, har unskippable cutscenes which just takes the replay value ride out of it,
  8. umutzzz
    Sep 14, 2021
    0
    Just another piece of same but different cover. These games should be free instead of 60 bucks. It is not worth it and most of the mobile games have better graphics
  9. Greek_objektife
    Jun 9, 2021
    4
    Понтенциальное возвращение к истокам провалили под частую,сюжет пресный,мультиплеер говнище и геймплей в синглплеере говнище полное плюс сеттинг второй мировой войны превратили в комедию
  10. JerTheStampede
    Apr 29, 2021
    1
    I hadn't picked up a Call of Duty game since Black Ops 2 back on the Xbox 360, I thoroughly enjoyed each instalment until BO2 at which point I felt something went horribly wrong but couldn't put my finger on it at the time.
    Roll on several years and I picked up WWII for PS4, to start with I thought yes the controls are tight the action reasonably well paced I thought 'this might be pretty    I hadn't picked up a Call of Duty game since Black Ops 2 back on the Xbox 360, I thoroughly enjoyed each instalment until BO2 at which point I felt something went horribly wrong but couldn't put my finger on it at the time.
    Roll on several years and I picked up WWII for PS4, to start with I thought yes the controls are tight the action reasonably well paced I thought 'this might be pretty solid'.. I was wrong.
    1st the quick time events (QTE) are horrible maybe it's me but reading the prompts wasn't obvious initially, and these QTE start getting over used real quick.
    2nd If anything makes me scream obscenities at a game it's headshotting an enemy (not a boss a normal grunt) and them getting up as if nothing more inconvenient than a tenis ball had bopped them on the nose and if you shoot a German in his velar weave mithril silver trench coat expect to empty several rounds to inconvenience him, what the hell man!? it isn't 1996 anymore! games moved past this kind of cheap bullet sponging decades ago.
    3rd British SOE agents, there is SOO much wrong with this anyone with half a brain or any level of understanding of the SOE is forced to cringe and I'm not talking about the now obligatory female agent (they existed maybe not in the capacity shown but I can live with that) what made me cringe was as soon as SOE were mentioned I thought ok when do they roll out the cockney weasels.. TADA as if by magic.
    By the time I derailed an heavily armoured train WITH A JEEP!!! ffs I had had enough, I couldn't suspend my disbelief any further this campaign was badly written poorly implemented garbage.
    I'm glad I didn't pay full price for this game I would have felt violated.
    I'm yet to try the multiplayer, for all I enjoy MP COD, the campaign is primarily why I used to buy these titles.    … Expand
  11. Muur
    Apr 9, 2021
    3
    The story line is kind of a joke to be honest.. I wasn't able to connect to characters and feel the game. Map designs are sometimes good and sometimes really bad. I've been playing FPS games for 7 years now this is probably the worst Call of Duty I've ever played. Your teammates just shoot around randomly, they don't kill any enemies mostly. Not so much bugs but I have experienced a gameThe story line is kind of a joke to be honest.. I wasn't able to connect to characters and feel the game. Map designs are sometimes good and sometimes really bad. I've been playing FPS games for 7 years now this is probably the worst Call of Duty I've ever played. Your teammates just shoot around randomly, they don't kill any enemies mostly. Not so much bugs but I have experienced a game breaking one on "Collateral Damage" mission. If you're buying this game for It's story It's not worth it. Even online doesn't worth it. I recommend buying other CoD games instead of this.… Expand
  12. StormHair
    Apr 7, 2021
    3
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Aunque no soy la mayor fan de los juegos en primera persona, las campañas en sí me han parecido entretenidas técnicamente. Sin más, pero ok. Al menos he podido afinar más mi puntería de sniper.

    Narrativamente, en cambio... ¡Ay, amiga! Decir que narrativamente es flojo se queda corto por mucho. Tenía unas expectativas inmensas en este juego: como fan de la IIGM, esperaba poder explorar la guerra hasta sus extremos. Cuando de repente me han salido los créditos (que, mind you, duran más que el juego en sí), me he puesto lívida. ¿Dónde está la captura de Berlín? ¿Y el frente ruso? ¿Y el enfrentamiento con Japón? **** ¿qué clase de visión parcial guarripei de un conflicto tan inmenso me he comido? *himno americano sueña de fondo* *bostezos en la sala* *se oye a alguien vomitando en los baños fuera*

    Eso por no hablar de la historia de Daniels, que, por tradicional y redundante, me aburría cada vez que se hacía referencia a ella... Ya que te pones a hacer un juego de esto, hazlo bien. ¡Dame personajes que me importen, carajo! En dos días me voy a haber olvidado de estos cinco como si nunca hubiera jugado. ¡Menos zombies nazis y más profundidad!    … Expand
  13. youngmarc23
    Feb 18, 2021
    0
    This game was alright. However, it does not come even close to topping the most classic Call of Duty games such as the Modern Warfare series and the Black Ops series. The game's biggest letdown is that it didn't bring anything new to the table aside from the setting. Sure it got better as time flew by but WWII is not bad or good enough to keep you grinding for hours.
  14. lipefe
    Feb 14, 2021
    1
    normal garbage, nothing new, get ready for random aimbot during the campaign and a lot of frustration. the enemies manage to hit you through the smoke grenade and depending on it is hitkill. CGI is good but during the game the graphics is all locked and grotesque, melee attacks don't work well and when you try to do some heroic act the enemies keep hitting you with aimbot.
  15. miamifinsboom_1
    Feb 8, 2021
    4
    I think its really over hated i loved the campaign zombies is also really good the mutiplayer ehh i think thats where peolpe are pissed with the game but 7/10
  16. Feels64
    Jan 10, 2021
    4
    This is just about the campaign..

    What I hate most about the campaign is how often it takes control away from you and puts you in these really clunky and stupid situations like QTE's. Why can't this just be a cutscene if it must be here? I just want to fight in the war, this stuff is so annoying. The only times I felt immersed were when it was pure combat. Pop out of cover, shoot,    This is just about the campaign..

    What I hate most about the campaign is how often it takes control away from you and puts you in these really clunky and stupid situations like QTE's. Why can't this just be a cutscene if it must be here? I just want to fight in the war, this stuff is so annoying.

    The only times I felt immersed were when it was pure combat. Pop out of cover, shoot, reload, dodge explosion, change cover. That's a fun gameplay loop. They try to stray from that so often, like they're afraid of it. It's so frustrating to get glimpses of what this game could be only for them to be interrupted with "GRAB THAT PANZERSHREK". If you don't do what they want you to, the AI willl scream it out over and over and over.

    The audo is also super messed up. Only 1 setting that controls all the audio. It's mixed terribly and you'll rarely even be able to hear dialogue. The bass overpowers everything else, completely drowns it all out.

    Some of the missions are so poorly designed. They spend so long on the scenery then lazily dump re-spawning AI all over. Very little care was put into making this game fun to play.

    The game ends in an extremely underwhelming way that is very obviously not what was originally intended. It feels very unfinished and this being the game that it is from the developers and publisher that it is from... It will never be finished.
    As that is the way of modern game design for AAA companies.
    Overall.. whatever. This game won't be remembered for any special reason. Extremely lazy and forgettable.    … Expand
  17. Xvatch
    Jan 4, 2021
    0
    Usual yearly complete load of **** bollocks. SBMM is definitely in it, though not as strong as modern cod
  18. C3py
    Dec 28, 2020
    1
    Worst CoD i ever played , very closed missions with claustrophobia and bad weapons choices.
    I also don't want watch boring cutscenes
  19. PixelGamer115
    Oct 24, 2020
    3
    - Campaign: 2/10
    - Zombies: 5/10
    - Multiplayer: 3/10

    .....................
  20. trival
    Oct 21, 2020
    3
    just **** ... single play camp sucks hard. dumb missions historically innacurate.
  21. vicente453
    Oct 17, 2020
    1
    lo compre por el trailer que se veia muy bien esperaba una historia epica y un buen online lo que tuve fue una campaña algo aburrida los personajes se te olvida que existen a los 2 minutos de juego los graficos son una mierda. el online es peor se trata de puras cajas y de comprar cosas para tu personaje basicamente es un juego decepcionante page two win y totalmente mediocre
  22. MadMax3
    Oct 1, 2020
    0
    Trash mais um jogo mal desenvolvido pela activision, tinha potencial para ser o melhor, mas como sempre os bugs e os glichs tomam contam de um jogo promissor.
  23. nicerdicer
    Oct 1, 2020
    0
    Terrible customer support. Leaves no reply no resolution after few times contacting them. My concern was language support for the game other then IP-bounded. I was forced to play with a language in game of my current residence, and I just want at least original language, normally I would pick whatever language I want for the supported list, but here you can not pick anything other thenTerrible customer support. Leaves no reply no resolution after few times contacting them. My concern was language support for the game other then IP-bounded. I was forced to play with a language in game of my current residence, and I just want at least original language, normally I would pick whatever language I want for the supported list, but here you can not pick anything other then language of a country you are currently residing… Expand
  24. Eeshan
    Sep 9, 2020
    0
    Before playing the game you have to download a update which is of 40 GB and if don't download it the game won't start . It's a ****
  25. Gleb0n
    Aug 6, 2020
    4
    A very short game about the Second World War. The plot consists in one thing: Either kill everyone, or blow up something. A lot of bugs and stupid NPCs. In short, the game has failed. 4/10.
  26. Idontlikecodww2
    Aug 2, 2020
    1
    Campaign, although fun, didnt give a ww2 vibe, wich is a huge letdown. Zombies is souless and boring while the multiplayer is bad
  27. brodaty_borsuq
    Jul 26, 2020
    3
    Campain only:
    I've played it for about 1 hour. Turned it off and naver came back.
  28. Free_Mind
    Jul 11, 2020
    2
    Stop listening to the corrupt, fake, paid-off reviews. This game is not worth buying. The story is boring and forgettable. The multiplayer is repetitive, boring and has some of the worst cut scene animations which look like they belong in a PS1 era game.
  29. Zukku
    Jul 11, 2020
    2
    What a terrible game. What a sad return to WW2. I actually enjoy the campaigns of COD games - this is the first that i just find totally unplayable. Bad characters, the worst quick-time-events i've ever seen, arcade-style shooting and the most boring story.
  30. DOLLAR_376
    Jul 1, 2020
    4
    Mediocre game which is nothing like the old and good entries of the saga.

    - Campaign is short, cliched and disapointing, with few interesting missions. - Multiplayer is boring and destroyed by the good old microtransactions, loot boxes, and in game store. To make it all better, now you can open your lootbox at the Omaha beach, which is kinda depressing. - Zombies is the most decent    Mediocre game which is nothing like the old and good entries of the saga.

    - Campaign is short, cliched and disapointing, with few interesting missions.
    - Multiplayer is boring and destroyed by the good old microtransactions, loot boxes, and in game store. To make it all better, now you can open your lootbox at the Omaha beach, which is kinda depressing.
    - Zombies is the most decent mode, but gets repetitive quickly, with new additions made via DLC.

    Overall, another disapointing entry in the saga that is not even worth half of its retail price.    … Expand
  31. Ba-Ouai-Logic
    Jun 29, 2020
    4
    By the americans, for the americans. If I had to describe the game in one word, I would say "America". America lost around 350k soldiers during this war, but it's strange and I wonder why this game didn't tell me a single word about the URSS army that won this war, entered Berlin firstly and lost about 23.5 millions of people...
  32. Ryan-44x
    Jun 26, 2020
    0
    Rewriting history, boring and outdated gameplay & game mechanics. Bad campaign Horrible zombies Multiplayer was ok for about 3 days then it got boring. And of course microtransactions...
  33. Chicoloco
    Jun 19, 2020
    3
    COD mechanics are still good but there are two major problems in this game:
    1 - The campaign is not that fun. It would be nice to have the Eastern front, for example, like in COD World at War.
    2 - We play always in the same maps in multiplayer. If we want more maps, it costs a fortune (something like 50 bucks). It's not acceptable.
  34. mrnice
    Jun 17, 2020
    4
    If the setting isn't cliched enough for you, the nazi zombies multiplayer mode serves an even bigger cliche. Just a corporate product for the mindless masses.
  35. undulum
    Jun 15, 2020
    0
    I checked this out because it was free on PS Plus.

    It is a wooden, unplayable disaster that defiles the memories of the people that inspired its story.
  36. Jtalk
    Jun 13, 2020
    1
    This is the worst shooter game I’ve seen in a while. The single player part features crowd favourites, such as:
    - Very hard QTE where you fight a nazi, that reloads very slowly - Dumb AI that likes blocking your line of sight on the enemy only to engage one further away
    - Aim that jumps up every time you get hit - A mount machine gun that doesn’t scare enemies in the slightest, it’s    This is the worst shooter game I’ve seen in a while. The single player part features crowd favourites, such as:
    - Very hard QTE where you fight a nazi, that reloads very slowly - Dumb AI that likes blocking your line of sight on the enemy only to engage one further away
    - Aim that jumps up every time you get hit - A mount machine gun that doesn’t scare enemies in the slightest, it’s easier to use a rifle
    - Lots of running - Enemies with amputated self-preservation instinct (and common sense)

    This game represents all the bad stuff that happens with commercialised milking of franchises these days.    … Expand
  37. XxAlbertoBuzzxX
    Jun 2, 2020
    4
    CALL OF DUTY: WWII
    ........................................................
  38. Codboy_07
    May 28, 2020
    4
    Horrible maps, bad gun balancing, garbage story mode. I got the game for free from ps plus and even then it is worthless. Cod modern warfare is a better game. This game does nothing new except add a destiny style hub with horrible lootboxes with garbage, recycled loot
  39. Australian-Dark
    May 26, 2020
    0
    Just **** the only good call of dutys are world at war call of duty classic which is the firts call of duty call of duty 2 call of duty 3 and call of duty 4 moden warfare after those they became absolutely trash no joke
  40. TBDSkripted
    May 21, 2020
    3
    Straight Garbage. Hours of time spent in this game and there is nothing to bring me to keep grinding. The game was doomed from the start with the “Lootboxes” oh sorry I mean Supply Drops! No spoilers ahead but don’t even bother with the Campaign, it’s a waist of time to be honest. The weapons are god awful! Why even include weapons from the other powers like Italy, Russia and Japan whenStraight Garbage. Hours of time spent in this game and there is nothing to bring me to keep grinding. The game was doomed from the start with the “Lootboxes” oh sorry I mean Supply Drops! No spoilers ahead but don’t even bother with the Campaign, it’s a waist of time to be honest. The weapons are god awful! Why even include weapons from the other powers like Italy, Russia and Japan when the factions aren’t in the game! Maps are alright the only good one it seems is Gustav Cannon. All the maps in the game(Non DLC) get boring quick. The addition of Shipment 1944 made it worse with all the Camping and fire shotguns. I’ve never really been a fan of Zombies but this just makes me want to never even start playing zombies. The game is not worth the money.… Expand
  41. eks77ern
    Dec 11, 2019
    0
    Offline (local) game, bought on disk cannot be started without internet connection.
    The score is corresponding to the amount of game play received.
  42. oBeSeMoDeo
    Oct 27, 2019
    2
    This game had so many problems for 6 months of its life cycle. It lost its player base before it even became the full product. Horrible management from the developers.
  43. levimans
    Aug 31, 2019
    1
    just a one for the graphics. I want to play a game, not a f...ing movie. I thought: finally a WWII shooter like World At War but nooooooo. almost no action in singleplayer and when there is action and you want to replay it, you have see al those video scenes again, can't skip them, f...ing annoying, jesus tapdancing christ. as well as the multiplayer: almost NOBODY plays it. medal of honorjust a one for the graphics. I want to play a game, not a f...ing movie. I thought: finally a WWII shooter like World At War but nooooooo. almost no action in singleplayer and when there is action and you want to replay it, you have see al those video scenes again, can't skip them, f...ing annoying, jesus tapdancing christ. as well as the multiplayer: almost NOBODY plays it. medal of honor allied assault was one of the best games ever. Why don't they make something like that again. So much fun to play, but this ain't fun at all. Money wasted for nothing except for good graphics. That's all… Expand
  44. M_Hjalmers
    Apr 5, 2019
    3
    I wanted to really like and enjoy this game, but it doesn't cut it for me. The campaign was good though 8/10. When ever I try this game I find my self going back to Cod Infinite Warfare, that game is so much better on all fronts in my opinion with the only exception that you can't save your custom game settings (???). I paid 80$ for this and I really regret it :/
  45. arconevv
    Mar 26, 2019
    1
    A piece of feminist **** SJW. The veterans of this war did not die for it. **** cuckolds, what happened to the white man?
  46. lmtz1618
    Feb 27, 2019
    4
    WWII is tolerable, sometimes. Sledgehammer hits similar but somehow worse notes than Advanced Warfare. War mode was the highlight, maybe only because of my parallel infatuation with Overwatch at the time. Zombies did nothing for me, and I don't remember the campaign. Sledgehammer basically bring only bad things to the code of a Call of Duty gunfight. The gunplay feels empty andWWII is tolerable, sometimes. Sledgehammer hits similar but somehow worse notes than Advanced Warfare. War mode was the highlight, maybe only because of my parallel infatuation with Overwatch at the time. Zombies did nothing for me, and I don't remember the campaign. Sledgehammer basically bring only bad things to the code of a Call of Duty gunfight. The gunplay feels empty and unsatisfying. The maps are not good, and are visually, quite possibly the worst of any COD I've played. (Since Modern Warfare 2) I also cannot shake the negative feeling the yearly release model places on this franchise. An attempt at a Call of Duty that ranges from barely tolerable and impossibly mediocre to bad, no good, and no fun.… Expand
  47. MetroidFelipe
    Feb 24, 2019
    1
    Worst Call Of duty , Return of WW II no Thats a pile o ****

    Pior Call of Duty que joguei campanhas em graça, multiplayer pobre e cheio de microtransações, não pula as cinematics lixo armas não realistas, Inteligência artificial burra e repetitivo,
    Passe Longe quer um bom game Coop jogue Battlefield 4 ou One, ou os Antigos Call Of Duty como o World At War!
  48. Coop123
    Jan 22, 2019
    4
    This was my first ever experience with a Call of Duty game. I must say i was not very impressed and quite disappointed. This game is basically everything we have come to expect in modern generic first person shooters. The game is amazing looking however and the graphics are top notch. The shading, the environments and lighting are all great. The sound of basically everything as well isThis was my first ever experience with a Call of Duty game. I must say i was not very impressed and quite disappointed. This game is basically everything we have come to expect in modern generic first person shooters. The game is amazing looking however and the graphics are top notch. The shading, the environments and lighting are all great. The sound of basically everything as well is great. The base game-play at its core is very well polished. The shooting feels perfect and movement is smooth. The campaign has some likable characters but the story is so generic and short making investment useless. Its well acted and sometimes actually well written but its so predictable and the everything feels so forced in so it can be condensed into a few hours. The game-play is standard corridor shooting and can get very old but the squad dynamic and having teammates supply you with health and ammo adds much needed depth. The vehicle sections feel under utilized and out of place. The game does switch it up sometimes and has some very cool moments but overall very average. The multiplayer however is a disaster. The maps are super small and force you into the same approach every time. They all feel very similar and generic. The weapons are good however and pretty diverse and feel good to use. Customization is lacking with certain divisions locking off certain things. Score streaks feel very unrewarding and useless and make the multiplayer feel very empty. The hub area has some cool things like playing old Activision games and one versus one duels. Mostly its a glorified loot box show room though. The cosmetic loot system is so lazy and broken that items are literally reused with different names. The cosmetics do not fit with the WWII setting and break any possible immersion. Zombies has some cool horror aspects and a cool atmosphere but the positives end there. The map is convoluted and annoying to navigate. Enemy variation is lacking and many things are made to complicated like the horrible perk system and power ups. Overall a very underwhelming experience.… Expand
  49. weirdmagican21
    Jan 11, 2019
    1
    i really wanted to like this game i wanted to grind to max rank nut this is probably the worst launch in call of duty history and the microtransactions are disrespectful to people who fought in WWII and the veterans who are still alive today.
  50. Camman12
    Dec 10, 2018
    2
    To be honest, it has it's fun moments, but that can be said for any Call of Duty game. I have never felt so board and upset to a Call of Duty game and this one made the list. The multiplayer is just awful, maps are a three lane system that keeps getting repeated, lackluster customization to classes, supply drops that give you nothing but trash, and hardly any fun game modes. The campaignTo be honest, it has it's fun moments, but that can be said for any Call of Duty game. I have never felt so board and upset to a Call of Duty game and this one made the list. The multiplayer is just awful, maps are a three lane system that keeps getting repeated, lackluster customization to classes, supply drops that give you nothing but trash, and hardly any fun game modes. The campaign is really good and is the only saving grace for this game, but it fell into a hole of trying to play it safe and have a World War 2 generic story. Zombies I thought would be fun, but I was wrong. It's just so bad I only played one map and didn't even bother with the other maps because it felt boring and stale whiten a few matches and it's even more disappointing when this gamemode is not meant for solo players and made more for co-op. 2/10 a Call of Duty you shouldn't waste your money on because it's boring and you don't get your money's worth out of it.… Expand
  51. itemnine
    Nov 17, 2018
    0
    Ive put it a lot of hours on the Multiplayer in this game. Probably way too many. It has so much potential, but every time there's a thread of fun, they wrap it layers of frustration.

    And now youre going to give me Contracts to get X kills in X amount of time on Domination, but i cant ever CHOOSE Domination anymore, so i just have to pray that everyone happens to vote for Domination,    Ive put it a lot of hours on the Multiplayer in this game. Probably way too many. It has so much potential, but every time there's a thread of fun, they wrap it layers of frustration.

    And now youre going to give me Contracts to get X kills in X amount of time on Domination, but i cant ever CHOOSE Domination anymore, so i just have to pray that everyone happens to vote for Domination, or i have to quit and keep rejoining, hoping it'll be Domination before the timer on my Contract runs out? No. Im done being tortured by these programmers.

    Ive never felt so much hatred for human beings as the people who made decisions like that.    … Expand
  52. One-Jammer
    Nov 12, 2018
    1
    The updates are too much and too many. Changes are ridiculous. The action was fine and now they keep adding stuff that don't make sense and are making the game not interesting at all. They took the game Gridiron away as a challenge and combined it with others. Sucks big time! Games are changing as you play. Very poor entertainment.
  53. InternetPerson1
    Oct 25, 2018
    4
    This game is basically everything wrong with most shooters today. Its all style over substance. Sure this is Call of Duty so of course the game is visually very impressive and the controlling and shooting feels great but this game is filled with little to no spark of creativity or emotion and a lot of greed. The campaign is fun with the great cinematic moments and the some charmingThis game is basically everything wrong with most shooters today. Its all style over substance. Sure this is Call of Duty so of course the game is visually very impressive and the controlling and shooting feels great but this game is filled with little to no spark of creativity or emotion and a lot of greed. The campaign is fun with the great cinematic moments and the some charming characters. it has a lot of fun moments and the new game play with having squad mates add flare to the game. However it plays it too safe and the story is generic and way too short. Some good but mostly forgettable. The multiplayer has some cool ideas like the HQ and the new division system but the maps, score-streaks, and mostly everything feels very meh. However the loot boxes and crates re using items is beyond scummy and just flat out dumb. The zombies is overly complicated with all these diffrnet perks and "load outs" and the map is confusing. This game does nothing new but the same old tired tropes in modern games.… Expand
  54. Nick-C
    Jul 6, 2018
    1
    It is approaching a year since this game was released and it is less functional than when it was released. The functionality of this game at a fundamental level is so broken that I have utterly given up on the franchise as a whole. It fails to connect to online services more than it succeeds. This franchise has taken up thousands of my life ever since I discovered World At War all thoseIt is approaching a year since this game was released and it is less functional than when it was released. The functionality of this game at a fundamental level is so broken that I have utterly given up on the franchise as a whole. It fails to connect to online services more than it succeeds. This franchise has taken up thousands of my life ever since I discovered World At War all those years ago but ladies and gentlemen I come to you today a broken man. Words cannot describe how much of an insult to our community this is. This is a game that IF you manage to connect will shove microtransactions and supply drops down your throat at every screen and opportunity its absurd. Once you clear away that trash and try to find a game there's a solid chance you'll be disconnected before it even starts. If it starts and you maintain a ping less than 100 then congrats you'll get to enjoy the most inconsistent gameplay I have ever experienced in an online game. The pacing in a humble game of TDM can change so fast. In one moment it'll be balls to the wall and then absolute silence for the rest of the game. The maps are simplistic, uninspired and boring to look at. In each DLC pack you pay for all you will get is a few new maps that are just as **** as the vanilla ones. Zombies has been turned into an overly complicated mess which is just completely against the ethos of zombies. The Colour palate is bland and washed out, the menu navigation is the slowest and most broken it has ever been in the history of the franchise and will straight up block you from accessing parts of the menu for no apparent reason. The campaign uninspiring, the script and its delivery make me want to do a Van Gough. At no point has this game felt worth the price it makes you pay. This game fails on all fronts. Microsoft had the good taste many years back to apologise for Windows Vista many years back and and that was good of them but, Activision, the only thing you can do to make up for this dumpster fire is to give a full refund to all who bought the game and desire one. This game, from a standpoint of gameplay and user friendliness , is more flawed than No Mans Sky. standpoint… Expand
  55. N-_
    Jul 6, 2018
    4
    The voice in this game yells at you that you have to do the missions: "conquer the bunker!" and "defend the bridge!".... I don't really like that.
    And the game goes a bit to fast for me....
  56. ifeelit
    Jul 2, 2018
    2
    - cliche camapign story. Never onced cared for a single character like I did in BO and MW

    - MP maps suck. Too small, Too cluttered, objects purposly placed to block view and every room has 92 open windows and hallways leading to you always getting shot from behind. One map in this game should be the size of all current maps combined - The MP system sucks, too many perks that never    - cliche camapign story. Never onced cared for a single character like I did in BO and MW

    - MP maps suck. Too small, Too cluttered, objects purposly placed to block view and every room has 92 open windows and hallways leading to you always getting shot from behind. One map in this game should be the size of all current maps combined

    - The MP system sucks, too many perks that never get used and the kill streaks are actually boring. Along with that, it takes too long to unlock what you want with the skin you favor being locked behind a loot crate. I quit the game only after playing it off and on for 4 months and i only collected maybe 15% of the stuff that I actually wanted.

    - the game, installed and played from disc with all the updates, was taking up 60gb on the my harddrive (for such a contentless game)

    - No soul in this game whatsoever.    … Expand
  57. njja02
    Jun 17, 2018
    4
    Better than the last few CODs, but still pretty average. The campaign this time around was too over-the-top and repetitive for me. But the multiplayer did add one mode that I enjoyed; War. Plus the zombies was a bit better this time around. But it just didn't do much for me overall.
  58. Keitha313
    Jun 1, 2018
    4
    Just keeping the review short and sweet.
    P.S. don't listen to the positive reviews they're just having you on trust me!
    Graphically the game isn't anything special, for a triple A title that had 3 years to work on the game they really dropped the ball big time on this! Gameplay wise, it's your usual COD minus wall running, boost jumping which isn't a bad thing when the game actually    Just keeping the review short and sweet.
    P.S. don't listen to the positive reviews they're just having you on trust me!

    Graphically the game isn't anything special, for a triple A title that had 3 years to work on the game they really dropped the ball big time on this!

    Gameplay wise, it's your usual COD minus wall running, boost jumping which isn't a bad thing when the game actually works, yes, that's right the game runs like total crap!
    The game suffers from so many wtf moments of how did I die, why does my gun seem like its doing less damage than his and this isn't just me saying this I've seen big Youtuber/Twitch players say the exact same thing!
    The lack of proper servers and the problematic lag compensator really screw this game up couple all of that with the fact the game matches people from across the world to play in lobbies, seriously how is that even happening!!

    Authenticity next, do they deliver? HELL NO they don't! Guns have terrible fake animations, it's just incredibly lazy, for an example when you shoot one bullet from the KAR98k and you go to reload instead of putting a single bullet in the character puts an entire stripper clip into the gun and they even put an entire stripper clip into the gun when you only have 1 bullet left in reserve, it's just absolutely laughable!
    Guns have no recoil they all shoot like damn lasers, snipers are just a one-hit kill from any range which just makes them the total unskilled weapon of many peoples choice.

    Then zombies... oh my god!!
    Making something easier isn't making it better, the zombies are basically invisible, yes they run faster, but it's so damn easy to avoid them you can run through them essentially and the map complexity is nil, void, there is no complexity or teamwork required so props to Sledgehammer on that *slow clap*...

    Finally, the story, it's a good war experience it displays some epic moments, nice change up of gameplay requiring health packs instead of regenerating health, but the story is far too short and lacks the same storytelling level that Treyarch brought to such a high standard.

    Overall, It's maybe not as low as I scored it, but the game is such a huge let down that I had to score it this way, so much for a short and sweet review.    … Expand
  59. itsdanky
    May 23, 2018
    0
    DO NOT EXPECT YOUR ORIGINAL FONDNESS TO BE REKINDLED BY THIS MASQUERADE.
    This is not a WW2 game. As stated by many others, this is a just modern warfare reskinned to look like WW2. I was very excited about this game, because I was an avid player of the original CODs in the WW2 era. I was hoping to get that experience with updated features. I am beyond disappointed. To help others avoid    DO NOT EXPECT YOUR ORIGINAL FONDNESS TO BE REKINDLED BY THIS MASQUERADE.
    This is not a WW2 game. As stated by many others, this is a just modern warfare reskinned to look like WW2. I was very excited about this game, because I was an avid player of the original CODs in the WW2 era. I was hoping to get that experience with updated features. I am beyond disappointed. To help others avoid buying this game with false expectations, I will tell you what aspects ruined it for me.

    -BOLT ACTION IRON SIGHTS DESTROYED
    Firstly, the only weapon I used in COD1, UO, and COD2 was the bolt action rifle with iron sights. It took skill, and it fit my play style of not jumping around like an idiot with an SMG. Bolt action rifles (iron sights only) also happened to be the most common weapon in WW2 apart from American forces. What does COD WW2 give us? One bolt action rifle with iron sights that was put into the game as an afterthought and must be unlocked AND take up an attachment slot. Scopes are the default. In addition the iron sight bolt action rifle still handles like there is a scope on it. The animation and timing looks and feels like you are trying to look through the lens. This exclusion of the one of the most quintessential aspects of the WW2 genre is a slap in the face to all bolt action iron sight lovers.

    -This is still nothing more than a full auto/quick scoping nightmare.
    Full autos existed in the original CODs, but they were nowhere near the instakill 'who shoots first' death machines that comprise CODWW2. Yes, a good player could iron sight someone at long range with a carefully aimed headshot, but not at full auto. The original full auto weapons wouldn't melt down 4 players instantly halfway across the map. The recoil was far greater, and trigger control was necessary for accuracy even at close range.

    -Bullet piercing is outrageous.
    Bullets from even small caliber fire piercing thick metal surfaces is ludicrous. It's even worse on rinse and repeat maps with predictable hiding places. Just shoot through where you know someone will be. Yawn.

    -Tactical awareness of surroundings ruined.
    Then: Stealth determined by careful movement and selective fire. Enemy positions determined by careless movement and selective fire. You learned to locate the enemy by listening and instinct. The distinct sound of a Garand after it fired its last round giving you a brief window of opportunity. The difference between an enemy and ally based on the type of gun being fired. Does a German break cover to pursue the location of the person firing an STG44? Not likely. Weapons were restricted to the forces that used them. This seemingly unimportant aspect makes a world of difference in actual gameplay. You had only your senses to help you. Yes people still did the "run n' gun"/"spray n pray", but they were at a serious disadvantage to a calculated player.

    Now: Any gun, any player. Weapon distinctions rendered pointless. Recon scorestreak to show enemy positions. So much overpowering ambient noise and/or perks to make listening for the enemy no more than a crapshoot.

    -Screen shake over the top.
    My screen shakes constantly. Far away explosions make your screen shake violently. It's a stupidly poor attempt at immersion and gives me a headache.

    -Melee Showdowns
    Who didn't enjoy watching two bolt actions clashing at close range and having a melee duel? Dancing around trying to land a carefully aimed rifle butt to the face. It was almost a common understanding, an unspoken gentleman's agreement if you will, to duke it out. It was an endearing aspect of the originals. Well, that's not a thing anymore. The old mechanics made it viable. Now, well, the game design doesn't even allow for such a thing to happen.

    Bottom Line:
    I made the mistake of pre-ordering this game on PSN due to my excitement but couldn't get a refund after I played the Beta. I didn't download the actual game and play it for 6 months because the Beta disgusted me. They destroyed practically everything that made the original games great. Why do I have to play for hours to unlock the most common weapon type in WW2 (iron sighted bolt action)?
    ***Yes I am aware that the American standard issue was not a bolt action, but the British, German, Russian, Japanese, Italian, etc were all issued bolt action iron sighted weapons as the primary small arm***
    Why is the only ONE available designed like garbage?
    This game was marketed with lies that appealed to the emotional attachment players had to the originals and only delivered hot garbage. The game doesn't even feel like WW2.

    I don't care about the micro transactions. You don't have to buy crates to get loot and unlockables. You get plenty of crates from orders and contracts. If people want to waste money on overpriced crates, that's their prerogative.

    Buy the game used if you must. There is certainly no shortage of used copies.    … Expand
  60. DirectoStream
    May 19, 2018
    0
    Buah que increible decepciòn el juego es igual que los anteriores pero peor aparte de que la campaña es jodidamente dificil lo que lo hace injugable las graficas no estan tan mal graficas 6/10
  61. hectortheboss
    Apr 27, 2018
    0
    this game isnt a call of duty. Is a comercial product. Activision are changing to Ea. dont buy his games if you are a fan of the old saga of call of duty
  62. Physastra
    Apr 21, 2018
    2
    This game is complete trash, probably the worst cod game ever created. All the hype scores were for week one when everyone was blinded by botg.. it is unforgivable the scores that people have given this game just because it doesn’t have jet packs. The maps are terrible, the divisions system is way too restrictive, the score streaks are boring. Everything about the game is bland, boringThis game is complete trash, probably the worst cod game ever created. All the hype scores were for week one when everyone was blinded by botg.. it is unforgivable the scores that people have given this game just because it doesn’t have jet packs. The maps are terrible, the divisions system is way too restrictive, the score streaks are boring. Everything about the game is bland, boring and ordinary. Don’t buy it unless you know what you’re getting into.… Expand
  63. i6mi6
    Apr 14, 2018
    0
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Firstly, the campaign doesn't even touch on the idea of Russians, Japanese and/or the German point of view. Same old "americans were the only one with souls and feelings, germans were robots" clichè. They included a black person with another "you underestimated the blacks" clichè and totally dumped historical correctness for the sake of political. Same goes for the women characters which had no purpose to be women and could have easily be replaced by more appropriately for the historical time men.
    The game conveys no feeling, similar to how WAW conveyed feeling of horror just by the looks of the menu, the soundtrack and so on. I can associate any COD with some feeling, but I can't associate WWII to anything. In addition, I didn't notice any impressive soundtrack.

    Let's touch on the Mutiplayer. The moment I open the menu I see how terrible the UI is. In fact, I wonder if it could be worse than that. It's confusing, cluttered with stuff, backgrounds change, blur and have no relation to one another when you navigate. Navigation is horrible. It feels more challenging to open weapon customization than reach lvl 20 in zombies. I can't see scoreboard during a multiplayer match. I have to go through a few tabs, then one option down, then a popup for confirmation in order to leave the match. I can go on for hours about what's wrong with the UI.
    Maps are mostly terrible. 3-lane, boring, no diversity, nothing fun or special about them. Such a rushed design. I will leave it here regarding multiplayer.

    Zombies are lacking the horrific Treyarch feeling. There is unnecessary customization. Playing zombies is extremely easy. No soundtrack, no cool sound effects when you pick up a drop, it just doesn't make me want to replay it.

    Overall, the game is horrible, rent it, play the campaign and get rid of it.    … Expand
  64. BaconHD
    Apr 12, 2018
    0
    Es una basura mas de lo mismo sin originaldad y abusa de las microtransaciones (en AAA) y solo lo juegan niños pequeños sin criterio propio y youtuber que quieren sacar videos de mierda
  65. Voorhees91
    Mar 12, 2018
    1
    I fell out of COD after BO2 so it's been a while. I was excited for this entry but of course came away disappointed and frustrated. The campaign is generic but decent enough. The multiplayer is the main point of the game and it is horrendous. I can't remember worse maps on a COD game. Every map is tiny and forces you into 3 lanes. There's no strategy at all. Basically the multiplayer isI fell out of COD after BO2 so it's been a while. I was excited for this entry but of course came away disappointed and frustrated. The campaign is generic but decent enough. The multiplayer is the main point of the game and it is horrendous. I can't remember worse maps on a COD game. Every map is tiny and forces you into 3 lanes. There's no strategy at all. Basically the multiplayer is like taking a bunch of autistic children, giving them guns and crack, and throwing them into a tiny map. Hit detection is nothing short of horrific. Time after time I'd fire a shotgun point-blank into an enemy's chest only to have it not register at all and be killed. Most gunfights are based on some perverse sense of luck rather than any skill. The weapon damage has no basis in reality. HQ is a waste of time, and the micro-transactions are simply another insult to an already poor game. If you want mindless run and gun with campers, horrible hit detection, no skill required, etc. then this game is for you. If you want a half decent FPS then look somewhere else.… Expand
  66. Blinkdgb182
    Mar 12, 2018
    0
    reflex sights were rarely used on small weapons in WWII. Why does COD think its okay to use it on small weapons? Why cant they make an actual somewhat realistic game for once?????
  67. FluffyBunnyBro
    Mar 10, 2018
    4
    Call of Duty WWII is a solid game, though it has MANY flaws. But before we get to the heart and soul of the game, the multiplayer, lets talk about the campaign.

    THE CAMPAIGN: It's pretty good, one of the better in the series, and the first one I've actually played all the way through since BO2. This campaign is a lot of the same stuff, but it feels more engaging because of the WW2    Call of Duty WWII is a solid game, though it has MANY flaws. But before we get to the heart and soul of the game, the multiplayer, lets talk about the campaign.

    THE CAMPAIGN:
    It's pretty good, one of the better in the series, and the first one I've actually played all the way through since BO2. This campaign is a lot of the same stuff, but it feels more engaging because of the WW2 setting, and shooting Nazis with iconic WW2 guns was pretty cool. The characters were okay, they were a bit flat, but at least there was something here. They felt like flat characters, but they were still characters, which is more than I can say about some of the other games. Overall, it was a Call of Duty campaign, and if you enjoyed the other game's campaigns, you'll enjoy this one. If you're not a fan, I would still recommend trying it, as it makes some improvements I really like, like being able to request ammo, and meds from squad mates. It was pretty good for a CoD campaign, but nothing amazing.

    THE MULTIPLAYER:
    Oh, where do I start.
    First off, the good: The gameplay is fun, and it does feel more like the older Call of Dutys without the jetpacks and all that crap. It's pretty fast paced, but I found the gunplay pretty satisfying and the overall gameplay just pretty fun. Also, in this game they introduced a new mode, War, and put simply, its a blast. It's basically Battlefield's rush but in Call of Duty. You have to make it through a few objectives while the other team tries to stop you. I really like it, and hope to see it return in future titles. Yeah, so gameplay is pretty good.
    And now, the bad: This game had the WORST launch in all of CoD history. The first 2-3 days I couldn't even get into a multiplayer. It finally started working for me, but it's still a bit shaky, sometimes lagging, or taking longer than it should to find a match. Other people have been getting it worse than me, and apparently can't get into a match even now. This is unacceptable for a $60 AAA game. Also, Headquarters is an epic fail. Currently, it is impossible to get into headquarters with another player, which is the whole point. Your stuck wandering around by yourself. Some achievements even require you to do things with other players, which is hard to do WHEN THERE'S NO OTHER GODDAMN PLAYERS!!!! I also just hate the idea in general, I just wanna get into a game and shoot some dudes while blasting classic rock in the background (Please tell me I'm not the only one who does that). But I don't give a s*** about "Social Score" and doing stuff in the headquarters. Why not just put all that stuff in menus? Anyways, now that I've covered some launch issues, lets cover things about the game's fundamental mechanics. Divisions is a stupid system. When they said they were "going back to their roots" I didn't think they meant they were legit going back and removing some of the great innovative features of the recent CoDs. This system was a complete step back from the pick-10 system. If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Sledgehammer said this one would feature more customization than ever before, which is just a flat out lie. In fact, it''s the opposite of the truth. There's less customization options for your classes in this one.
    This game is also lacking some iconic WW2 weapons. For example. the Sten, it was promised before the game launched, but it's nowhere to be seen. The Mosin Nagant, perhaps the most iconic sniper of the war, is completely absent from the game. We're also missing the Gewehr 43. This game doesn't feature a revolver of any kind either, which is most perplexing of all. Revolvers are such an iconic part of any war, I don't see why they wouldn't bother to include one in the multiplayer. Especially because there's one featured briefly in the campaign. They programmed the model and all the animations but didn't put it in the multiplayer?
    And finally, black female Nazis. Just, why. NOBODY would have complained if women weren't in the game. It's almost disrespectful to all the men who fought and died in the war. Even more stupid, is that you couldn't play as a female soldier in Infinite Warfare, a game taking place a few hundred years in the future, in freaking space for crying out loud. Nope, no females in that but WW2, yup, put women in it. Wtf?
    And finally,

    THE ZOMBIES:
    I'm not a huge zombies fan but this one's okay.

    THE VERDICT:
    CoD WWII is a good change of pace, and a solid Call of Duty experience, but is plagued with launch issues and broken gameplay mechanics. If you're a huge Call of Duty fan, and was looking forward to this one, go ahead and buy it. If you're not really into Call of Duty and are on the fence, I might be a bit hesitant to spend $60 on it. 6/10. Solid WWII shooter, and a needed change of pace for Call of Duty.
    Edit: 5 months in and I'm done. Boring gameplay, terrible maps, I only have 30 characters left, but no replay value basically.    … Expand
  68. HENCHMAN
    Feb 14, 2018
    0
    Absolutely tired of the lack of effort and creativity of this franchise. I quit on this franchise a few installations back however I will continue to write a review and give a Zero because of their total disregard for the end user. Interestingly enough, it's the end user that enables them to repeat this year after year. In my 3 years supporting the franchise, nothing new was offered, justAbsolutely tired of the lack of effort and creativity of this franchise. I quit on this franchise a few installations back however I will continue to write a review and give a Zero because of their total disregard for the end user. Interestingly enough, it's the end user that enables them to repeat this year after year. In my 3 years supporting the franchise, nothing new was offered, just smoke and mirrors masquerading as something new, again at a premium of $60. None of us would buy a new car and trade it in for the newer version every year, yet most of the community does it with this game. I really wish the player base who share my sentiments would just stop buying the game and force them to change their model. The current model is to maximize profits, and give the impression of improvement or added value without actually doing it. The marketing and press are essentially lobbyists artificially inflate what is truly a inferior game. I could go on but I'll stop now. This franchise is forever ruined as long as Activision is involved, as is Destiny. Good day!… Expand
  69. joker41187
    Feb 13, 2018
    2
    Wow this is a bad game, online is fun enough... But the campaign mode is the cheesiest most unrealistic waste of cinematics. The gameplay is fun enough. I am done with the call of Duty franchise...
  70. monkey77
    Feb 11, 2018
    4
    now i have never played the game but all i am aware of is the poor map design, why is map design important you may ask, if the map you play is three lane garbage over and over again why would you play the map you wouldn't, almost every map in the game is three lanes three choices go middle go left go right, also unlike previous COD games they over use the invisible barriers i recall innow i have never played the game but all i am aware of is the poor map design, why is map design important you may ask, if the map you play is three lane garbage over and over again why would you play the map you wouldn't, almost every map in the game is three lanes three choices go middle go left go right, also unlike previous COD games they over use the invisible barriers i recall in black ops 2 that i could jump on what ever i wanted tanks cars ect, and if there were barriers they weren't that obvious or annoying, the game play is same old call of duty but more of a meat grinder where you die and the kill streaks are useless, in conclusion call of duty world war 2 is at best temporarily mediocre and will inevitably get repetitive. also microtransactions… Expand
  71. JPBGamer
    Feb 3, 2018
    0
    Just reached master prestige yesterday and I have to say this was my worst cod experience to date. I have played almost all cods since black ops and although I did get pissed off I still had fun. This game gave me none of that. It was just a torture fest of playing war cos i couldnt stand playing any of the base gamemodes. Even the new dlc maps are garbage. What where SHG thinking whenJust reached master prestige yesterday and I have to say this was my worst cod experience to date. I have played almost all cods since black ops and although I did get pissed off I still had fun. This game gave me none of that. It was just a torture fest of playing war cos i couldnt stand playing any of the base gamemodes. Even the new dlc maps are garbage. What where SHG thinking when they made this game is beyond me. DO NOT BUY THIS GAME PLS.… Expand
  72. bloodyice56
    Jan 28, 2018
    1
    Dont waste your money on this cash grab, same old processed trash, less content than any other call of duty. How does this game have less weapons than world at war. Also i thought this was about the U.S army vs the nazi germany, why are there Japanese and Russian guns and hardly any bolt action rifles, besides the snipers. Historically inaccurate, you can get better ww2 games with moreDont waste your money on this cash grab, same old processed trash, less content than any other call of duty. How does this game have less weapons than world at war. Also i thought this was about the U.S army vs the nazi germany, why are there Japanese and Russian guns and hardly any bolt action rifles, besides the snipers. Historically inaccurate, you can get better ww2 games with more content, no loot boxes, and cheaper.… Expand
  73. Ungodly_Phantom
    Jan 26, 2018
    3
    Таки добрался я до этого "шедевра". Начнем по порядку. С первых минут компании мне сразу стало понятно, что игра ориентирована на американский ПАЦРИОТАФ. Все тот же тир с болванчиками-фрицами и бравыми американскими героями. Сюжет унылый,скучный и предсказуемый. 4 из 10
    Сетевая игра это просто пиздец, и любители этого кгворят что в бф1 скучно? Повсюду кемпера, ваншотающие мины-растяжки,    Таки добрался я до этого "шедевра". Начнем по порядку. С первых минут компании мне сразу стало понятно, что игра ориентирована на американский ПАЦРИОТАФ. Все тот же тир с болванчиками-фрицами и бравыми американскими героями. Сюжет унылый,скучный и предсказуемый. 4 из 10
    Сетевая игра это просто пиздец, и любители этого кгворят что в бф1 скучно? Повсюду кемпера, ваншотающие мины-растяжки, нулевой баланс оружия и баллистика, ужасный геймдизайн карт. Тошнотворный сетевой режим. Ужасно долгий поиск матча без возможности выбора нескольких режимов под поиск. У бравого американского десантника с сверхжёсткой подготовкой выносливости хватает на 3(!!!!!) секунды бега!!!!Один из худших сетевых шутеров на моей памяти 0 из 10
    Зомби-режим. Оставалась надежда на зомби-режим, и он, на фоне остального более менее играбелен. 5 из 10
    Вывод: Очень посредсвенный тир, с ужасным сетевым режимом, 30 часов жизни выкинул в пустую. Настоятельно рекомендую обходить данную игру стороной.
    БФ1 просто на 10 голов выше этого, имхо    … Expand
  74. LightPoth
    Jan 23, 2018
    3
    Call Of Duty: WW|| is quite lacking when you start to get into the game and play more. The Multiplayer has little to no maps for the general player, Zombies is a rip off from Treyarch's and has no replay-ability after a weeks worth of playing.
  75. w1919
    Jan 20, 2018
    0
    I have played COD for 10 years, WW2 is definitely the worst COD i ever played! i don't even know were to start with all that is wrong with this game! Everything! if you like lag, camping, head-glitch, grenade spam, OP-snipers, and overall a glitch game that sometimes don't even work when you want to play, this is the game for you! Im going back to play older CODs.
  76. Turbodowg
    Jan 6, 2018
    1
    Cod WW2 is IMO one of the worst in the entire series along side Ghosts and Blops 2 and 3. It is basically broken.
    I have no idea what they've done to the servers but for the past two weeks they no longer work. The lag is game breaking and completely destroys all the fun. It makes the game a frustrating mess. Nearly every game I play I see the enemy first, unload a full clip into them    Cod WW2 is IMO one of the worst in the entire series along side Ghosts and Blops 2 and 3. It is basically broken.
    I have no idea what they've done to the servers but for the past two weeks they no longer work. The lag is game breaking and completely destroys all the fun. It makes the game a frustrating mess. Nearly every game I play I see the enemy first, unload a full clip into them getting 10 hit markers while they kill with one bullet. Even playing with steady aim and firing from the hip doesn't work, as soon as you see an enemy -as you are pulling the trigger- you are dead. On the rare occasion you will beast but sadly knowing it's because everyone else is lagging. Sometimes it hilarious; like when I came up behind a camper facing the opposite direction, unleashed a series of bullets into his head only for him to suddenly teleport around and quick scope me. Sometimes you could cry - like the round I played and went 0.20 because not a single bullet from any weapon would register.

    I switched back to IW and there I was, top of every game pulling high scores and low deaths. No other game I own lags like COD WW2. Battlefield runs perfect, Overwatch runs perfect, COD IW runs perfect, COD 4 remaster runs perfect yet WW2 is like playing on a 46k modem.

    The social hub is still a ghost town which they haven't bothered to fix, but made sure they added COD Points to buy loot crates!

    Maps are a mess, badly designed and boring. There's next to no content.

    The war maps are actually pretty fun and for some bizarre reason don't lag anywhere near as much as the standard maps, but there's only 3 of them!

    With the season pass you get a remastered map from COD2 which is insulting considering they didn't give enough maps with the main game, no doubt it was removed simply to entice people to buy the season pass.

    Basically it doesn't work, we should all be refunded for paying for a product that is basically in alpha stage still.

    Worst Cod in the history of cod. Avoid at all costs.

    ....................................................

    Update 06.01.18
    Two months after launch I have deleted COD WW2. The servers are completely broken to a point where it is now impossible to play. Lag com, poor hit detection, teleportation and spawns are destroying any fun that could have been had. Every game is a constant frustration and doing well is not based on skill but if you have lag comp for or against you. It's beyond frustrating to shoot first, get 12 hit markers and die to see in your kill cam you haven't even fired a bullet. This is officially the worst COD in the entire history of COD. It's a cheap rushed bare bones mess.    … Expand
  77. Hourless
    Jan 1, 2018
    2
    Pros:

    -World War 2 setting -Competitive Multiplayer has it's moments I guess Cons: -Same mechanics for the past few games, felt like the only change was the World War 2 setting -BORING coop zombie mode, high priced game that only produces ONE map and you can imagine it gets boring and repetitive very quickly. I honestly preferred the coop in COD: Ghosts. -Generic WW2 single    Pros:

    -World War 2 setting
    -Competitive Multiplayer has it's moments I guess

    Cons:

    -Same mechanics for the past few games, felt like the only change was the World War 2 setting
    -BORING coop zombie mode, high priced game that only produces ONE map and you can imagine it gets boring and repetitive very quickly. I honestly preferred the coop in COD: Ghosts.
    -Generic WW2 single player campaign, it's been covered so many times by different games it's hard to get excited
    -Outdated graphics, graphics look pretty much the same as COD: Ghosts were
    -Expensive DLCs to come, you would think the game is expensive enough as it is but wait there's more!
    -Just a twitch shooter, honestly most guns lack any kind of real feel behind them.    … Expand
  78. xpyrosh
    Dec 31, 2017
    1
    You spend 130 dollars of your hard earned cash towards a game just to be given "unable to connect to host" every single time you try to play with the people you bought the game to play with. This is disgusting and there should be compensation or full refunds available to people due to this. Completely unacceptable for 2017 standards.
  79. JustMK
    Dec 30, 2017
    1
    Boringest Call of Duty that put me into sleep with first minutes of gameplay. I really liked Advanced Warfare and Infinite Warfare for their awesome futuristing setting, and I completely bored, annoyed of WWII theme in 2000's.
    I want back AW/IW-like CoD games. That was awesome
  80. danelectroman
    Dec 28, 2017
    1
    godawful! Why do these money grubbing corporations think all we want to do is watch a frickin movie. Stupid cut scene after cut scene. golly, AFTER another ten minute hollywood derived cut scene you mean you're actually going to give me the privilege of pulling a trigger on a gun. Oh, thank you idiot programmer, who has no vision and is only happy to be typing code in a cubicle next to agodawful! Why do these money grubbing corporations think all we want to do is watch a frickin movie. Stupid cut scene after cut scene. golly, AFTER another ten minute hollywood derived cut scene you mean you're actually going to give me the privilege of pulling a trigger on a gun. Oh, thank you idiot programmer, who has no vision and is only happy to be typing code in a cubicle next to a lame female you don't have the nerve to ask out because you're spineless. A 1 for the graphics but who cares, I'd rather play a nineties war game where you can actually play instead of this cut scene crap!… Expand
  81. gmello00
    Dec 27, 2017
    0
    Oh man, I have no idea how they messed this game up, but they did. Here are my biggest issues

    Campaign: Remember when Call of Duty actually had good campaigns that could be considered a selling point? I'm talking about the Modern Warfare trilogy, World at War, Black Ops 1 and 2, etc. This campaign does not fall into this category. Daniels is a bad main character. The game spends a lot    Oh man, I have no idea how they messed this game up, but they did. Here are my biggest issues

    Campaign: Remember when Call of Duty actually had good campaigns that could be considered a selling point? I'm talking about the Modern Warfare trilogy, World at War, Black Ops 1 and 2, etc. This campaign does not fall into this category. Daniels is a bad main character. The game spends a lot of time trying to make the player feel bad for him, but I simply don't know enough about him to feel any emotion towards him. There are some interesting new mechanics in the campaign, such as health that can only be replenished using medkits, and squad members being able to resupply, but the resupply mechanic needs work. The only reason I took stuff from them is because they would not shut up until I took it from them. I had to toss grenades randomly on purpose just so my squad member would stop screaming every five seconds that he had grenades ready. The opening level is very good, you get a good sense of the danger soldiers faced and how grim the battlefield is. Every level after this is nothing like level 1 and they just get boring after a while. I think this game could have benefited from a branching stories campaign like World at War, because fighting Germans exclusively gets old, especially knowing that WWII wasn't only fought between the U.S and Germany. Overall, the campaign is a waste of time.

    Multiplayer: Awful. The game only came with 9 maps, which should be considered unacceptable. Headquarters is a waste of space. Call of Duty doesn't need a social hub and it only caused the game to crash or simply not work for about a month after release. The weapons are unbalanced. There is auto aim on the snipers and SMGs and shotguns are definitely overpowered compared to the assault rifles and LMGs. War mode is a joke. Given the run and gun style of COD multiplayer and the fast death times, how did they think an objective heavy mode like this would work? But the worst part is I'm writing this review more than a month after release and the game is still broken. Crashing is still a big issue, the supply drops you supposedly earn during games never appear in your inventory, and hit detection is still awful, and Sledgehammer has the nerve to push their first DLC pack while the game is still broken and they do nothing about it. A very bad experience.

    Zombies: I don't have much to say about this, but it's not very good. I'm a big fan of Treyarch zombies, so I had high hopes, but it didn't deliver. The characters are boring and the map is one big boring circle. It's also too easy. The game's equivalent to Juggernog on steroids is available right from the start for a measly 500 jolts, This mode is nothing special.

    This game alone has made me skeptical about buying future COD titles, but it has ensured that I'll never buy another product with Sledgehammer's name attached to it ever again.    … Expand
  82. UltraVIbe
    Dec 26, 2017
    2
    COD WWll is a complete mess. You can pick out the bad things all damn day from the Gun loadouts and variety (COD WW1 had more weapons) to the maps being completely laid out the same and bland maps. The maps in multiplayer doesn't just feel that they lack variety of where to go but all the maps have a 3-laned way from each side. And the loot boxes. When are we ever going to get rid of thisCOD WWll is a complete mess. You can pick out the bad things all damn day from the Gun loadouts and variety (COD WW1 had more weapons) to the maps being completely laid out the same and bland maps. The maps in multiplayer doesn't just feel that they lack variety of where to go but all the maps have a 3-laned way from each side. And the loot boxes. When are we ever going to get rid of this means of marketing that always cycles and repeats. Everytime you ask for a loot box it gives you the same thing such as grips that you cant even look at ingame to Emotes that look all the same with different titles and rarity. COD WWll Zombies Stripped out some features that it was known for as well. Like the music that you get from the box and is now replaced with... well nothing (there is no recognizable sound). It hardly takes any sort of means to actually come up with a strategy anymore because all you have to do is run and gun then hopefully you get that OP gun that the Zombie mode gives you FOR FREE!!! The one thing I actually feel is sorta well done is the campian. It might have a couple of flaw from there to there but the campian does offer a variety of missions with different playstyles (unlike multiplayer)… Expand
  83. BBQ
    Dec 18, 2017
    0
    Failure again. They may have gotten rid of the Marvel Superheroes versions of the games and got back to where it should be, but many of the key were never fixed. This includes the quick-scoping sniper shots and the perk stuff that is often constant when you are on a team that is doing nothing but getting killed.

    With the quick-scoping, you can miss by 3 meters and still get an    Failure again. They may have gotten rid of the Marvel Superheroes versions of the games and got back to where it should be, but many of the key were never fixed. This includes the quick-scoping sniper shots and the perk stuff that is often constant when you are on a team that is doing nothing but getting killed.

    With the quick-scoping, you can miss by 3 meters and still get an instant kill (if you aim and don't hit the head, you may not get a kill). This takes so much away from the multiplayer that just this issue requires me to award the multiplayer a complete failure. I know there are people that love this, but it is ridiculous.

    My other annoyance is all complete stupid little things you get for kills and how fast they come. I have had games that I quit because we were owning the other team so bad that it you couldn't play the shooter. I have joined games where the team I was on was getting so wasted that I couldn't even leave spawn - kept getting hit by all the perk crap, before I even took one step.

    After the last three games, I have decided I will no longer buy a copy of COD. Too bad you had to keep going downhill starting with MW3... (for those of you that thought the nuke was cool, really!?!?)    … Expand
  84. ChibiDaFox
    Dec 13, 2017
    0
    Not even worth the score it got. The game is as accurate to the books as Mario was to physics. I'm no Nintendo fanboy, don't worry. But honestly, this is a real shame. And also, pay to win gameplay and **** servers.
  85. Riddler68
    Dec 13, 2017
    0
    They promised an back to the roots boots on the ground call of duty, well let's see:

    Lootboxes: Check Broken Skill-based matchmaking: Check Terrible hit-detection: Check Garbage maps: Check Whole 9 maps (woow): Check **** up perk system: Check Useless    They promised an back to the roots boots on the ground call of duty, well let's see:

    Lootboxes: Check
    Broken Skill-based matchmaking: Check
    Terrible hit-detection: Check
    Garbage maps: Check
    Whole 9 maps (woow): Check
    **** up perk system: Check
    Useless killstreaks: Double Check
    Ruined Nazi Zombies: Triple Check

    Ok well... just like every call of duty since mw 3 they **** up and no one was expecting this... right. Guys, what were you expecting? it's still Call of Duty, the series that **** on the customers opinion to sell as many copies as possible.

    They will never change no matter what they say. This series dumbed them self down to be as appealing to every **** dumbass from every **** corner in this world.

    Save your money and wait for proper games that will be released in 2018.    … Expand
  86. Baldpubis
    Dec 12, 2017
    0
    Remember when video games were creative, interesting, and fun? Well, if you play this dud longer than an hour, you probably don't. I think I fell asleep holding the controller. Yawn.
  87. Gurdur
    Dec 11, 2017
    3
    Back to basics? I think not. This game continues in the same wrong direction the series has taken since MW2 (which is the last really good COD game in my opinion). The maps are too small, players spawn behind you all the time, and there is no real tactical aspect to the game anymore. You can't plan your moves, find good sniping spots and/or outsmart players. It is all about reflexBack to basics? I think not. This game continues in the same wrong direction the series has taken since MW2 (which is the last really good COD game in my opinion). The maps are too small, players spawn behind you all the time, and there is no real tactical aspect to the game anymore. You can't plan your moves, find good sniping spots and/or outsmart players. It is all about reflex shooting.

    I really don't understand why the developers have gone in this direction. Maybe it is to differentiate themselves from BF. Either way, the COD series has become a joke to serious gamers. I will not buy the next title.

    So if you like a fast paced fps where the only real skill needed is quick reactions, then this game is for you. If not, stay away.    … Expand
  88. MrRedMarsmallow
    Dec 11, 2017
    1
    - Only 10 MP maps
    - Guns are in no way authentic
    - Loot boxes - Loot boxes - Loot boxes - Gameplay feels extremely unrewarding - War mode is terrible - Campaign is far too short and very boring - PPSH-1 is far too powerful - MP maps are poorly designed - Quick-scoping - Zombies is nothing to write home about - Doesn't feel nor look like a WWII game - "Daily Orders" and    - Only 10 MP maps
    - Guns are in no way authentic
    - Loot boxes
    - Loot boxes
    - Loot boxes
    - Gameplay feels extremely unrewarding
    - War mode is terrible
    - Campaign is far too short and very boring
    - PPSH-1 is far too powerful
    - MP maps are poorly designed
    - Quick-scoping
    - Zombies is nothing to write home about
    - Doesn't feel nor look like a WWII game
    - "Daily Orders" and "Contracts" systems feel unrewarding
    - "Headquarters" makes the frame rate plummet (and you can't choose to be alone in HQ)
    - Menu system is horrendous
    - Game still has server errors and connectivity issues

    + Graphics are okay    … Expand
  89. Arkas
    Dec 10, 2017
    0
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Thought this was going to be a great game, I was wrong! REALLY WRONG.
    The campaign was ok, not great but just ok. The ending was disappointing and the story itself actually sucked.
    Multiplayer: WORST multiplayer ever! Nothing worst than having opposing players shooting through walls to kill you. Wooden walls sure, but when you run around a corner of a brick wall and you die, come on COD, I'm sure your developers can do a better job than this.
    If you're looking for a WW1 or 2 style of game just go and buy Battlefield 1, I am not a fan of the Battlefield series but it blows this COD away.
    Bought this game less than a week ago and will be trading it in for something else today.
    COD WW2 is nothing but an attempt to copy other games but instead of making a step forward they took two steps back!!! Not sure if they hired new developers but this game is awful. Poor gameplay, poor graphics, crappy maps and whats with the headquarters? HQ is stupid.
    DO NOT waste your money on this game, not sure why some people think its a great game, they all must be high on drugs?!?!?!
    COD needs to get back to basics and come out with a game that reflects today's world struggles such as Afghanistan, Iraq, ISIS, etc.....Modern warfare was a great game.
    Sorry for the bad review but this game is a waste of money!    … Expand
  90. whambulance
    Dec 10, 2017
    0
    CoD continues it's downward spiral. Definitely the last one I buy. Terrible maps, terrible balances, worse patches, object clipping galore. Welcome to World War Quick Scope. If you want actual combat you're better off with anything else.
  91. BlueKetsueki
    Dec 8, 2017
    4
    Would only recommend to people who haven't played cod for a while, i can honestly say i have seen Fifa change more than cod the last few years which shows how stale it is wait for the modern warfare 2 remaster or buy an older cheaper better cod.
  92. llostsoll
    Dec 4, 2017
    0
    The campaign mode is extremely disappointing. There is nothing good I can say about this game other than that the graphics look good and quite polished.

    It’s more of the same. (big wallet = big fun)
  93. deanlynch2
    Dec 4, 2017
    0
    Nice to be back to boots on the ground but, This game has alot of issues, worst cod i have ever played, right now do not waste your money on this game.
  94. andrewcarey7
    Dec 3, 2017
    2
    Maps are garbage - they have no structure and the gameplay quickly falls into a mess of no strategy especially on objective game modes. The hit detection is extremely poor; 1v1 gunfights are horribly inconsistent. This game was pretty much my last chance for COD. Will be selling this game
  95. StanleyFatmax
    Dec 2, 2017
    0
    This game is doodoo.

    I hate most of all, the fact that you get to pick what you look like going into a battle. In the last COD WW2 game, if you were on the side of the Japanese then you wore a Japanese uniform. Same goes for being on the American team, German, Russian and so on... Now, not only do you get to pick what uniform you wear, you also get to pick your gender and ethnicity.    This game is doodoo.

    I hate most of all, the fact that you get to pick what you look like going into a battle. In the last COD WW2 game, if you were on the side of the Japanese then you wore a Japanese uniform. Same goes for being on the American team, German, Russian and so on... Now, not only do you get to pick what uniform you wear, you also get to pick your gender and ethnicity. That is so dumb, imo. For me, it takes away from the feelings of immersion to see a black female in a Wehrmacht uniform. Also, it makes it hard to tell friend from foe.    … Expand
  96. BrutallyHnstGmr
    Nov 27, 2017
    3
    I created an account, just for this game. Wow, I don't know what game the "real" reviewers are playing, but I'm glad that a site like this allows for players opinions, because for the most part, the players are right. MULTI-PLAYER REVIEW ONLY: I also want to get it off my chest that shame on the developers for trying to erase history by censoring the swastika, the biggest Nazi symbolI created an account, just for this game. Wow, I don't know what game the "real" reviewers are playing, but I'm glad that a site like this allows for players opinions, because for the most part, the players are right. MULTI-PLAYER REVIEW ONLY: I also want to get it off my chest that shame on the developers for trying to erase history by censoring the swastika, the biggest Nazi symbol there is. Everybody knows what it is and what it represents but it's still a part of history and if you are going to make a WWII game, regardless, you should probably leave it in.

    This game feels like a mistake. My bet is that Sledgehammer was going to make Advanced Warfare 2, and after Battlefield One's success and the fans hatred for COD in space, decided to scrap the work they had done on AW2 and rushed through this mess of a game. That's the best I can sum this up, as a rushed mess. I will disclose that I am a very big fan of Advanced Warfare, to date it's my favorite COD, I'm also a huge fan of Battlefield One, so grounded action is perfectly fine. This game cannot hold a candle to BF1, it's like comparing a Chevy to a Ferrari. HINT: Call of Duty is the Chevy.

    Graphically, this game is definitely a step back, both myself and my wife commented on how much worse it looks, almost like a PS3 game. From the character models to the boring and generic maps, oh and small maps. But as any seasoned gamer knows, graphics aren't everything, so let's move on.

    Sound: I typically give games of today a pass given the quality that exists with audio. gunfire is gunfire, bomb blast is bomb blast, nothing special, nothing spectacular. The sounds of burning humans is pretty comical though. The issue though is if you actually compare this game to Battlefield One, you can see the significant difference between the two companies and games, if you've never played BF1, then the audio is fine.

    Game play: Well, it's not terrible, it's back to basics, but it's still just mindless run and gun. I read one "professional" review that stated it brought strategy back to the series, what?? No there is no strategy, it's just mindless run and gun, which isn't necessarily a bad thing. Everything so far feels responsive, and though server matchmaking is an issue, when in game, it seems everything works fine. My biggest problem with COD, which has just gotten worse with WWII, is the quick scope sniping bull****. How do I know it's worse, let me tell you how, and you don't even need to watch the kill cams to see people completely missing people and getting kills. My wife, is terrible at video games, but she loves them, and tries to play them. One thing she could not do on any game, either COD or BF1, is snipe. Well, guess what, the sniper rifle is her favorite gun in WWII because of the lack of needing to be accurate. I've watched her, and I've watched the kill cam, it seems there is a hit box around the player, so that as long as your bullet lands within the box, it registers a hit. This is total garbage, and when the really good players figure this out, which they have, it makes some matches completely unplayable, the cannon map. There's no skill, you don't need to time shots, you just scope and pull trigger at the same time, dead. The game modes themselves look like all the same stuff, with the exception of War, but I can't comment on that because I haven't played that yet. There's not that many weapons and getting exotic weapons seems pointless because unless I'm missing something, they do not do anything to increase the stats of the actual weapon, just add like 10x exp or some Zombie kill perk thing. The class system is fine, no complaint there, just be careful when changing weapons, do not change weapon classes under a class, change the entire class. For example, if you have the shot gun class but want to use a machine gun, don't change the shotgun to a machine gun, you lose your incendiary rounds per, instead make a infantry load out.

    Overall: I like it better than Black Ops III, which was returned to the store the next day, at least this one hasn't been returned. It's not nearly as fun as Advanced Warfare. If you want a really good shooter, pass this one up and get Battlefield 1. EA has to be laughing all the way to the bank, every time Activision releases a new COD game, it just makes their game look all the much better.

    UPDATE: It's been returned to the store.    … Expand
  97. Tscolaro1
    Nov 27, 2017
    3
    I was cautious about buying this game because it has been clear to me that Activision is one of the companies that has been generally horrible towards their customers in recent years. Against my gut feeling, I purchased this and found exactly what I should have expected. COD WWII feels as if it was thrown together with little care because they knew that this game would sell well becauseI was cautious about buying this game because it has been clear to me that Activision is one of the companies that has been generally horrible towards their customers in recent years. Against my gut feeling, I purchased this and found exactly what I should have expected. COD WWII feels as if it was thrown together with little care because they knew that this game would sell well because the words Call of Duty are in the title.

    Overall, I liked the single player a lot, that is this game's saving grace. I actually feel as if this was one of the better campaigns of the past few years. The multiplayer feels as if they threw $20 into a usb drive and are now trying to run the entire multiplayer servers through that. It is appalling how poorly the servers have been since the launch nearly a month ago and I have seen no signs of it getting better. The zombies was alright, I think that the new zombies games need to tone it down a little, but that's just personal preference.

    Overall, definitely a waste of $60.    … Expand
  98. Lukestrn
    Nov 26, 2017
    3
    This was such a great chance to turn things around for the COD developers. Unfortunately, multiplayer is still comparable to chickens running around with their heads cut off. Spawn, die, repeat. Maps are average at best. Weapons are fun (not that futuristic BS). Multiplayer would have been much, much better if the maps were larger and thus slowing the pace of the game. A game of TDM takesThis was such a great chance to turn things around for the COD developers. Unfortunately, multiplayer is still comparable to chickens running around with their heads cut off. Spawn, die, repeat. Maps are average at best. Weapons are fun (not that futuristic BS). Multiplayer would have been much, much better if the maps were larger and thus slowing the pace of the game. A game of TDM takes 5 minutes when it should be closer to 15. No penalizations for kids leaving every time their team starts losing. I guess it doesn't matter what the community thinks anyways because the kids are going to keep buying this garbage and feeding developers money for being lazy. Load times for logging in, interface, and maps are laughable. I'm not even going to bring up the loot boxes.. This is a problem that will continue until gamers come together and boycott the developers (especially EA) who employ these microtransactions.… Expand
  99. TechMarine
    Nov 26, 2017
    2
    What a huge waste of money. Should be called Connection Off Duty. Multiplayer is entirely dependent on who has the minutely better connection. Maps are TINY and 6v6 boring roflstomps. Does nothing great for the franchise except Zombies. Hope I can get 30 bucks for this **** on aftermarket.
  100. davidas101
    Nov 25, 2017
    1
    Boring, Bland, Buggy, This COD game is a huge disappointment for me, its single player campaign was average at best, the multiplayer was absolute garbage in comparison to COD Black ops 3 or even Infinite Warfare. The best way to describe this game in my opinion is that the entire time I was playing this I was thinking this game should have launched about 4 years ago instead of AdvancedBoring, Bland, Buggy, This COD game is a huge disappointment for me, its single player campaign was average at best, the multiplayer was absolute garbage in comparison to COD Black ops 3 or even Infinite Warfare. The best way to describe this game in my opinion is that the entire time I was playing this I was thinking this game should have launched about 4 years ago instead of Advanced Warfare or something along those lines. DO NOT BUY… Expand
prev
Page:

Awards & Rankings

82
#82 Best PS4 Game of 2017
9
#9 Most Discussed PS4 Game of 2017
9
#9 Most Shared PS4 Game of 2017

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
79

Generally favorable reviews - based on 83 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 62 out of 83
  2. Mixed: 21 out of 83
  3. Negative: 0 out of 83
  1. CD-Action
    Jan 10, 2018
    70
    I really wanted CoD’s return to World War II to be something more than a solid game – but it’s not. I couldn’t shake the feeling that I’ve already seen all this, that the developers (or perhaps the publisher) chose to create something as safe as possible. There’s just one campaign mission that surprised me with its scale, the rest is just a disappointing “best of Call of Duty”. The multiplayer is as good as usual, but it was infused with unnecessary systems resembling mobile titles, e.g spending in-game currency on pointless tasks of the “kill 100 enemies” variety. Missions that make you watch other players open their loot boxes are the pinnacle of absurdity. [13/2017, p.64]
  2. The Digital Fix
    Dec 22, 2017
    70
    A solid return to its roots, Call of Duty WWII reminds us what made us all fall in love Call of Duty in the first place. It ticks all the boxes which is both a blessing and a curse. Good fun and worth your time but offers nothing exceptional.
    Read full review
  3. Playstation Official Magazine UK
    Dec 15, 2017
    90
    Revitalised and exemplary FPS gaming. Multiplayer trims back to the essentials, campaign shows sensitivity and Zombies...well it's a new excuse to play CoD Zombies. [Christmas 2017, p.77]
See all critic reviews »