SOCOM 4: U.S. Navy SEALs

 PlayStation 3
  • Publisher: SCEA
  • Release Date: Apr 19, 2011
User Score
6.4

Mixed or average reviews- based on 133 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 69 out of 133
  2. Mixed: 30 out of 133
  3. Negative: 34 out of 133
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. JoseManuel10_
    Sep 4, 2023
    5
    Socom 4: U.S. Navy Seals is a 2011 third-person tactical shooter video game developed by Zipper Interactive and published by Sony.

    - Weak and Boring Campaign
    - Bad Graphics
    - The set Action Pieces are Forgettable
    - Boring Scenarios
    - Clunky Gameplay
  2. The_D4RknesS
    Jun 17, 2023
    8
    It has changed a lot compared to PS2 games but even so the game is wonderful and has great gameplay! The graphics are also beautiful
  3. EvgenyBychkov71
    Oct 17, 2021
    0
    Ужасная игра для которой 6 баллов это комплимент.
    - отвратительное управление
    - герои такие что хочется что бы они умерли уже после первой миссии
    - стелс не работает
  4. BeboFett
    Jan 23, 2019
    5
    A mediocre title. A cliché story that brings absolutely nothing. The action isn't entertaining enough, the control is NOT good, the panoramic plane feels strange and isn't comfortable, and very short.
  5. XJoseManuel10X
    Apr 28, 2018
    5
    Socom 4: U.S. Navy Seals is a 2011 third-person tactical shooter video game developed by Zipper Interactive and published by Sony.

    - Weak and Boring Campaign
    - Bad Graphics
    - The set Action Pieces are Forgettable
    - Boring Scenarios
    - Clunky Gameplay

    My Score: 5/10
  6. Arcteros
    Sep 22, 2015
    7
    These games such as SOCOM and CONFLICT I love them all and I honestly afterpiece both the PS2 and PC and is usually evaluates 8/10 or more but unfortunately at this part I give 7/10 . The game fulfills all the previous parts (great mission , good graphics , great controls , tactical options ) but has two fundamental errors and they are short playing time and stealth missions that areThese games such as SOCOM and CONFLICT I love them all and I honestly afterpiece both the PS2 and PC and is usually evaluates 8/10 or more but unfortunately at this part I give 7/10 . The game fulfills all the previous parts (great mission , good graphics , great controls , tactical options ) but has two fundamental errors and they are short playing time and stealth missions that are incredibly inept frustrating .… Expand
  7. AT_17
    Nov 20, 2014
    6
    It's hard to understand what Zipper are targeting with this instalment, it feels somewhere between a typical first person shooter and something completely new. Graphically the game is uplifting, but the game modes are very limited and lag occurs frequently. It is not worth its full price tag, and will likely be disappointing for the fans of the series
  8. Mosh603
    Nov 19, 2014
    6
    Being a big fan of Socom 1 - 3, I was very excited for this game. I even ordered the bundle pack that came with the PlayStation MOVE and gun. This game was pretty disappointing to me. The MOVE worked alright with the game, but it was too clunky and not user-friendly. The storyline was lackluster and the online play for the game was poorly done. I used to spend countless hours playing SOCOMBeing a big fan of Socom 1 - 3, I was very excited for this game. I even ordered the bundle pack that came with the PlayStation MOVE and gun. This game was pretty disappointing to me. The MOVE worked alright with the game, but it was too clunky and not user-friendly. The storyline was lackluster and the online play for the game was poorly done. I used to spend countless hours playing SOCOM II online for the PS2;This game totally killed the SOCOM franchise.… Expand
  9. darkwraith
    May 10, 2012
    10
    Socom 4. upon release took a lot of flak from fans of the series as well as from trolls on zippers official forum. But taking a second look at socom 4 apart from the loss of a few in-game mechanics like guns hot (your'e gun would move indicating an enemy was near). You begin to appreciate how much of a quality game zipper interactive actually made. The maps and campaign graphics areSocom 4. upon release took a lot of flak from fans of the series as well as from trolls on zippers official forum. But taking a second look at socom 4 apart from the loss of a few in-game mechanics like guns hot (your'e gun would move indicating an enemy was near). You begin to appreciate how much of a quality game zipper interactive actually made. The maps and campaign graphics are highly detailed and the foliage even allows you camo that actually works. stealth works consistently too so if you snipe an enemy on a bridge. closer enemies will not react and rush in to kill you, as they do in the recently released sniper elite v2. Having said that most campaign missions require both run and gun and stealth to complete. Socom is the thinking mans call of duty. Were tactics and pre-planning works better than trying to simply shoot everything that moves, that usually results in an un-timely death. The amount of content is good from the lengthy and challenging campaign the seperate online or offline co op missions to the full multi-mode multiplayer with leaderboards full guns and performance stats and medals to show your online progression with a fully working clan, and invite system the online after the final 1.04 patch is about 90%stable allowing for many hours play without lag or disconnect problems. Dedicated servers too so no host migration at all spoiling youre game. Also the uni-forms are replicas of the real item and voice localisation of troops is great. ie chinese troops speak chinese just like they do in real life. Sadly this may be the last in the Socom series as Zipper -Interactive no longer exists. But despite its critics i would recommend socom 4 now if youre looking for a more realistic war game than a lot of more recent titles and even some forth coming titles with recent beta,s do not beat socom 4.r.i.p. Zipper-Interactive.… Expand
  10. Gaming4Jesus
    Mar 13, 2012
    9
    I ACTUALLY gave this game an 8.5 in a Christian Game Review on my You Tube Channel, Gaming 4 Jesus ( http://www.youtube.com/Gaming4Jesus ). But MC won't allow us to give half-points. :/ In summary, if you want an excellent single player game which requires use of tried and true battle tactics, this game is second to only Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter series. TheI ACTUALLY gave this game an 8.5 in a Christian Game Review on my You Tube Channel, Gaming 4 Jesus ( http://www.youtube.com/Gaming4Jesus ). But MC won't allow us to give half-points. :/ In summary, if you want an excellent single player game which requires use of tried and true battle tactics, this game is second to only Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter series. The multiplayer was really nothing to write home about. :( If you wish to see my video review of the game, you can watch it by going to this URL: http://youtu.be/8W5nXtCDKqA

    However, all my video game reviews MAY contain spoilers. So be warned! ;)    … Expand
  11. rukia-chan
    Feb 18, 2012
    9
    Socom 4 and mag are one of the best games ive play so far compare mag or socom to all others games from BF to COD to brink to homefront whats game can be enjoyable as socom 4 or mag ?? Zipper deserve respect Socom 4 have some issue need to be adresse BUT THe game bashing must END i think every games bashers must be banned from socom forums because they have no place here they ruins theSocom 4 and mag are one of the best games ive play so far compare mag or socom to all others games from BF to COD to brink to homefront whats game can be enjoyable as socom 4 or mag ?? Zipper deserve respect Socom 4 have some issue need to be adresse BUT THe game bashing must END i think every games bashers must be banned from socom forums because they have no place here they ruins the forums they ruins zippers and its not good for anyone… Expand
  12. CardiffGiant
    Dec 28, 2011
    0
    Let me keep this short and sweet. SOCOM abandoned all that was once pure. Whatever they had is now gone. If you are a old school SOCOM'er DO NOT BUY THIS GAME. If you are lame.com and are under the age of 2 than this game is perfect for a sippy cup coaster.
  13. bmt11
    Nov 13, 2011
    0
    It is hard to say which is a further departure from what the socom brand used to stand for when considering either the single player or multiplayer of this game. The campaigns of every other socom(excluding one that was multiplayer only) was based around a customizable team that you had to tweak just right each mission. In those mission you had to use stealth and determine the best path toIt is hard to say which is a further departure from what the socom brand used to stand for when considering either the single player or multiplayer of this game. The campaigns of every other socom(excluding one that was multiplayer only) was based around a customizable team that you had to tweak just right each mission. In those mission you had to use stealth and determine the best path to complete your mission or you were likely to be overwhelmed by enemies. This new campaign does everything but pull the trigger for you guiding you down linear paths against swarms of scripted enemies which are still beatable because you conveniently have super health and damage. Not to mention the loss of features such as voice commands which were present in the PS2 era games yet are missing today? What definition of progress does this fit under? But when it comes to the socom franchise most people are more interested in it's multiplayer than campaigns. That arguably manages to disappoint even more where the old one life a round scheme originally inspired by counterstrike is shuffled off to a secondary mode. Gone also are all the game modes that made the MP popular and along with the lack of any original maps in the base game the new maps seem to be either randomly thrown together or designed to be perfectly symmetrical making for an utterly un tactical experience. The community features that were developed through the franchises life are also missing being replaced by a queue system that makes it a pain to find a good room. And on top of all that the shooting mechanics were made to be so beginner friendly the only tactical element of the game is who has the most patience and does not pop out of cover first to be hit by a headshot instantly. Besides all the poor design choices the quality of the game is just as bad. The graphics are acceptable but artifacts are often visible(don't even get me started on the explosions) while the sound on the other hand it just awful, every gun sounds alike and that sound is nothing like a gunshot. Gone is the character customization introduced in the last socom and instead it regressed to character skins half of which look like they belong in the gym pumping irons and steroids instead of on the battlefield, which they are not even equipped with the right camouflage for a jungle environment that matter. The game was built on the MAG engine and it's obvious that they copied and pasted nearly everything from that game, and MAG was a bad game in the first place.… Expand
  14. Shdaowgate
    Nov 10, 2011
    10
    Different then older socom but a great game anyways. The new game modes are alot of fun. Nice to see developers trying something new. In a time where respawn is kind it is great Zipper kept a classic mode for all of that are true.
  15. Jobadkins
    Nov 3, 2011
    10
    What a game,I love everything about this game.Thanks a million that it got the patches it needed cause yes it truly needed it.The game was good but needed help because it was rushed.I usually won't go out and get a game that is bashed by reviewers so badly,except for a few.People are really hypnotized with black ops fever cause this game is better and more real.It's like comparing anWhat a game,I love everything about this game.Thanks a million that it got the patches it needed cause yes it truly needed it.The game was good but needed help because it was rushed.I usually won't go out and get a game that is bashed by reviewers so badly,except for a few.People are really hypnotized with black ops fever cause this game is better and more real.It's like comparing an arcade racing game with a simulation.This game is real while more and more military games are being streamlined and made arcadey just for the fun aspect.So you have a choice,go out and buy them all like I do or if you have or want to choose then what is your preference,do you like run and gun like black ops,do you like real and rewarding like bad company 2 or do you like it all which is this game.Trust me folks,the game play,graphics,feel of war,replay factor,team based mission structure,ect..,ect..This game is the game to get.… Expand
  16. Sci-Fi-Dude1456
    Nov 1, 2011
    6
    SOCOM used to be awesome on the Ps2 but now it went downhill. Everything about this game just sucks and I returned this game to Gamestop and exchanged it for Ratchet and Clank All 4 One and even that game was better than this because it was actually fun.
  17. Bosefus123
    Oct 27, 2011
    10
    This is the most underrated multiplayer game ever. It's fast, fluid, fun and looks gorgeous. Great game modes, lots of weapons and cool looking characters. It's way better than Call of Duty and Battlefield games.
  18. JeffEagle
    Sep 24, 2011
    10
    I guarantee everyone on here that is crying about how they hate this game are playing it right now. You can't tell me that you don't have fun when you play it, regardless of it's problems. Stop comparing it to other socom's. No one care that you've been playing socom since the first one. Get over yourself and be honest, you probably play socom 4 everyday like the rest of us.
  19. Skytop
    Aug 26, 2011
    0
    With SOCOM 2, Zipper had a near perfect title, Fantastic Multiplayer, Epic Soundtrack, and Amazing tactical squad based single player. Now, They are planning on re-booting the franchise with SOCOM 4. So what is their definition of reboot? Take out EVERYTHING that made SOCOM 2 good, and then improve the graphics, and while their at it, focus on some motion control fad then the actualWith SOCOM 2, Zipper had a near perfect title, Fantastic Multiplayer, Epic Soundtrack, and Amazing tactical squad based single player. Now, They are planning on re-booting the franchise with SOCOM 4. So what is their definition of reboot? Take out EVERYTHING that made SOCOM 2 good, and then improve the graphics, and while their at it, focus on some motion control fad then the actual gameplay as even more of a slap to the face to SOCOM fans. Squad control interface? Dumbed down to the point where it is as broken and useless as the RPG elements in Mass Effect 2 (Don't get me wrong, Mass Effect 2 was a good game) Smart Squad AI that makes you feel like a leader, rather then a baby-sitter? Gone. Stealth play? Gone. Open environments that give you tactical options that aren't 'Obvious sniper rifle on the high balcony'? Gone. All the characters from the SOCOM Franchise? Gone. Difficulty? Gone. US Navy SEALS? Even THOSE are gone. That's right folks, You don't even play as the US Navy SEALS, You play as 'NATO Special Operations'. The combat is clunky and feels broken, Your squad mates seem more interested running in single-file formation into enemy fire rather than following orders. Did Zipper make this game just to slap SOCOM Fans in the face? Bottom line: Game tries to be just any other shooter, and even fails at that, resulting in a broken mess of a game. You would get a better use of your hard-earned money by wiping your ass with a $50 bill.… Expand
  20. ALNbandido
    Jun 29, 2011
    8
    This is the best SOCOM yet. This under-rated shooter shines at giving the high level of tension and coordination that comes from being a U.S Navy SEAL. Surprisingly, the sound effects really give you a sense that you're in the middle of a real battle. I've never experienced this in any SOCOM game. Also, the gun-play is spot-on. It's not Call Of Duty level of spot-on gun-play, but for aThis is the best SOCOM yet. This under-rated shooter shines at giving the high level of tension and coordination that comes from being a U.S Navy SEAL. Surprisingly, the sound effects really give you a sense that you're in the middle of a real battle. I've never experienced this in any SOCOM game. Also, the gun-play is spot-on. It's not Call Of Duty level of spot-on gun-play, but for a third-person tactical shooter, it's pretty good. Using the D-Pad to give out orders, Thinking up strategies with your squad has never been easier. Left for the blue team, right for the yellow team and down to regroup. This makes using your team alot of fun. Something I disliked in previous SOCOM games. The story is the best in a military game since the first Modern Warfare. Give Zipper Interactive alot of credit. They really went all out when it came to giving us the first good SOCOM single-player campaign. The custom campaign mode is a pretty cool way to give the game more replay value. Better yet, you can play them in Co-Op. Teaming up with friends lets you strategize the missions in a way that would be impossible with A.I. team-mates. Multiplayer is great as always. It has alot of variety in the game-types, rewards, unlock-ables and the interface is pretty easy to use. Now, don't get me wrong, SOCOM 4 is great but it's not perfect. The later missions in the story campaign get so hard that you'll be laughing out of frustration just to distract you from the fact that you want to throw the controller to the TV. The camera really needed some more polish as it gets in the way sometimes and makes your character completely disappear. I struggled with this regularly throughout the game. The A.I. is not the smartest I've seen. Your team-mates sometimes get in the way and then scream at you as if it was your fault that you shot him in the back. Also, the enemies seem to be super-human since they can hear your footsteps from a mile away. You can be quietly sneaking and all the sudden an entire army comes at you guns-blazing.

    SOCOM 4 has it's issues but the pros outshine the cons. Longtime SOCOM fans should feel right at home and very satisfied with this latest entry. And for those tired with the Call Of Duty's and Battlefield's, this game is a great change of pace from all the run-and-gun shooters that are dominating the market these days.    … Expand
  21. Zenvo_ST1
    Jun 20, 2011
    0
    A sad day for SOCOM fans and a slap in the face from the devlopers, there is nothing good to be said about this title or the dev anymore....this game is literally MAG2 (in 3rd person) and nothing like SOCOM...co op can be fun but as far as MP goes......terrible....and ONLINE GAME WITH NO PARTY SYSTEM
  22. Patriotsman12
    Jun 3, 2011
    10
    The Socom series is easily one of the best series on the PS consoles. Socom 4 does not disappoint, its a great game with a whole lot of content this is a must buy.
  23. Richard919
    May 31, 2011
    0
    When i first heard this game was announced i was absolutely ecstatic. Finaly Zipper returns to Socom to bring the GREAT series to Playstation 3. Then it was released and i couldn't have been more disappointed. Lets see where do i begin..? I'll begin in the single player campaign. First off each and every single level looked like it was straight out of MAG. Now dont get me wrong i actuallyWhen i first heard this game was announced i was absolutely ecstatic. Finaly Zipper returns to Socom to bring the GREAT series to Playstation 3. Then it was released and i couldn't have been more disappointed. Lets see where do i begin..? I'll begin in the single player campaign. First off each and every single level looked like it was straight out of MAG. Now dont get me wrong i actually liked MAG alot but this (Socom) was supposed to be a different game. There was no attempt to create new environments whatsoever. Second and the most important, the gameplay. Socom is great because of the tactical game play. This however was the complete opposite of the older games in the series. They reduced the expansive command menu from the past games to the simple "go here" and "shoot him". You are no longer graded at the end of each mission as before. The GREAT stealth aspects from the past Socoms are absolutely gone. There are "stealth missions", but they are forced and only are playable with one character. The attempt at "stealth" in this game was pathetic. In the old Socoms you could stealth your way past just about every level and there were multiple paths through each level. There was also the option the shoot your way through the level if you wanted. The point being there were multiple ways to beat a level. Socom 4 deviates from that great formula by throwing wave after wave of enemies at you. Every level is run 20 ft then have a 10 minute fire fight, run 20 ft then another fire fight. Its obvious Zipper took the Call Of Duty route here and tried to attract the casuals to this game, but in the process ruined their name and a game. Second, the A.I. in this is just terrible. Both your team and the enemies. I dont know how many times I would "command" my team to positions only to be killed by an enemy or 2 that walk right past my team and shoot me. Unless you specifically "command" them to shoot some one the team is useless. They stand out in the open getting shot and killed even if they were told to move behind cover. Third, the story is very weak. The past Socoms never had the characters emotionally tied to what was going on the game. They were exactly what they should be, military MISSIONS. The characters weren't personally involved in the conflict. And that brings me to the main character, Cullen Grey. It's blatantly obvious that they were going for Nathan Drake's (Uncharted) image. They failed in that attempt. Anyone who finds this "story" and characters interesting needs to re think gaming as a hobby. Now the mulitplayer. It is NOTHING like the the previous Socom games. Zipper completely went the casual Call Of Duty route here. The classic mode is not what Socom was. It is an insult to the hardcore Socom fan base. It's clear that it was second to the non classic mode, which was NEVER the case in the past. These new modes, game types, and the run and gun play style is something that would never be found in a TRUE Socom game. Socom used to be for the hardcore shooting gamers that took patience, skill, and team work to play. Zipper turned their back on the fans that made that series what it was and now only want the money from the casuals out there. Bottom line here, if youre looking for a next gen Socom game then Socom 4 is NOT it. Confrontation was bad on release but has since been fixed up and was actually a good game that tried to keep Socom's identity. Socom 4 = Biggest disappointment of 2011.… Expand
  24. SpartanEdge
    May 31, 2011
    8
    Unlike alot on here,i'm not judging this game on what it is,not what it 'isnt'.i'm reviewing this as a game in its own right.& that is a fun to play & competent Squad Action game.Sure,its not much like earlier Socom games.They were obviously trying something different here.Stop moaning that this isnt like another title,& just enjoy this for what it is.I'm sure they'll be more traditionalUnlike alot on here,i'm not judging this game on what it is,not what it 'isnt'.i'm reviewing this as a game in its own right.& that is a fun to play & competent Squad Action game.Sure,its not much like earlier Socom games.They were obviously trying something different here.Stop moaning that this isnt like another title,& just enjoy this for what it is.I'm sure they'll be more traditional Socom titles in the future,& i'll be sure to enjoy & try them too.The only reasons the score isnt higher,is because it didnt have Co-Op in the campaign(what a waste of potential),& the Stealth Missions,which i didnt find particually enjoyable,& just felt like they were in the way.Anyone who says Confrontation is better than this is mad.Its a very poor quality multiplayer-only game,that isnt even what the Seals are about.Seal missions are about going in,completing a very specific mission,then getting out,with as least 'Confrontation' as possible.Not llingering in one place,in a prolonged,pointless firefight..… Expand
  25. RD74
    May 27, 2011
    10
    I love tactical shooters, Rainbow Six, Operation Flashpoint, Battlefield games etc, but I have to say that SOCOM 4 is a great game. The single player mode is decent at best, but the online is where (IMO) this game excels!! Good variety of modes and detailed maps. I enjoyed MAG by these same devs, but SOCOM is where its at for me. Brilliant online game in every sense of the word.
    If you    I love tactical shooters, Rainbow Six, Operation Flashpoint, Battlefield games etc, but I have to say that SOCOM 4 is a great game. The single player mode is decent at best, but the online is where (IMO) this game excels!! Good variety of modes and detailed maps. I enjoyed MAG by these same devs, but SOCOM is where its at for me. Brilliant online game in every sense of the word.
    If you like your "no tactics, run and gun" games, then CoD is for you (altho I have been very disappointed with the last 2 CoD games, not a patch on MW 1). People keep harming on about 'there's no seals in the game', well if your from the states, the game is called SOCOM navy seals, I'm sure you get to play as a seal. Around the rest of the world it seems to be called SOCOM special forces, and is localized for your country. If team work and bit of Rambo solo is your passion, then you wont go far wrong with SOCOM. Brilliant work Zipper. Collapse    … Expand
  26. impactwrench
    May 24, 2011
    1
    Absolute disaster. This game makes SOCOM Confrontation look great. Everything about this game evolved around online play with your friends. Its next to impossible. There is no way to make a room and have everyone join and play a medley of all maps the way you like them. Zipper lost it. I just want my SOCOM game native to PS3. PLEASE vote to have SOCOM native to PS3 and bring all theAbsolute disaster. This game makes SOCOM Confrontation look great. Everything about this game evolved around online play with your friends. Its next to impossible. There is no way to make a room and have everyone join and play a medley of all maps the way you like them. Zipper lost it. I just want my SOCOM game native to PS3. PLEASE vote to have SOCOM native to PS3 and bring all the classic maps back. RIP SOCOM franchise.… Expand
  27. SLY12
    May 21, 2011
    2
    Okay, where to begin? Let's see...for starters, I've played all of the Socom games on the ps2 and ps3. I thought the original Socom and Socom II were very well done. All of the other versions, not so much. With that said, I would have to say this is easily the worst game in the series. I am giving this game a score of 2 just because of all things, the sp. The mp is just too messedOkay, where to begin? Let's see...for starters, I've played all of the Socom games on the ps2 and ps3. I thought the original Socom and Socom II were very well done. All of the other versions, not so much. With that said, I would have to say this is easily the worst game in the series. I am giving this game a score of 2 just because of all things, the sp. The mp is just too messed up. To me, the shooting mechanics are broken, the characters movement is clunky, the map selection is poor and there are more issues to numerous to mention. I actually am surprised when I say the sp is the strongest part of this game and that's not saying much. I think it's just passable as a generic shooter, not a Socom game. I played it just because the PSN was down and to get all of the trophies. Beyond that, it is forgettable in every way. In conclusion, if you want a generic shooter that tries to be a little bit of everything out there today, but does no one particular thing well, then this is your game. Everyone else, should stay far away.… Expand
  28. Rosco
    May 19, 2011
    6
    After ignoring previous SOCOM installments I decided to give this one a bash in the hope SOCOM had rediscovered its form. Sadly, SOCOM is no longer the game it once was and this certainly won't live long in the memory. If SOCOM didn't have the multiplayer on offer this would be a very average shooter. Single Player is short, forgetable and largely uneventful. For me, it failed to reallyAfter ignoring previous SOCOM installments I decided to give this one a bash in the hope SOCOM had rediscovered its form. Sadly, SOCOM is no longer the game it once was and this certainly won't live long in the memory. If SOCOM didn't have the multiplayer on offer this would be a very average shooter. Single Player is short, forgetable and largely uneventful. For me, it failed to really focus on the tactical side of things which is something I seem to remember SOCOM done relatively well however I was disappointed as it seems as though they have put to much emphasis on the shooting side of things. Its as simple as getting weapons completing a level and carrying on there's no unlocks which is surprising and it doesn't leave you feeling rewarded. A frustration for me in particular was no grenade arc, why?! Besides that it doesn't last long and you won't take anything away from the experience. Visually the camera angle seems wretched, not anywhere near as bad as Kane and Lynch but it's certainly a big flaw in SOCOM4. The graphics on show aren't to bad but they aren't great but SOCOM never really relied on ground-breaking visuals to be a success. Fortunately SOCOM can take heart with the fact that the multiplayer is dependable and you will get a lot of enjoyment from the game if you have bought it solely for this. With a good variety of modes to choose from there's plenty to do. Some might be furstarted with the shortage of maps but the detail is great. SOCOM4 is not the worst game in the series but it's not anywhere the greatness we have seen in the past. A poor single player mode let down by a lack of depth and gametime is only bailed out by a solid multiplayer and with games like Operation Flashpoint impriving SOCOM has a lot of work to do to get itself back to anywhere near its former best.… Expand
  29. Coolade
    May 16, 2011
    0
    I am going to keep this short and simple. Zipper abandoned the expectations that come with the name "Socom". Terrible camera, terrible gameplay, no recoil, no grenade arc, no lean, no lobby or party system, terrible leveling up system for weapons and mods, no push to talk, no escort or breach medley, only 8 maps. What is this? A terrible modernization for the "casual" gamer. Avoid at all costs.
  30. Mattaclysm
    May 5, 2011
    6
    Socom 4 is a game that actually grew on me from first starting it up. The game itself the black sheep of the Socom series, you aren't even SEALs during the Campaign. First and foremost my major complaint would be the camera. Why in god's name is it so damn close?! It feels so weird being right up in your face. It can be a little glitchy too. I've actually had a few occasions whereSocom 4 is a game that actually grew on me from first starting it up. The game itself the black sheep of the Socom series, you aren't even SEALs during the Campaign. First and foremost my major complaint would be the camera. Why in god's name is it so damn close?! It feels so weird being right up in your face. It can be a little glitchy too. I've actually had a few occasions where Forty-Five would start twitching and going insane on my screen and another occasion actually on mission 2 where several enemies were trying to walk into the same place and were just walking into each other for about 10 minutes. Secondly this might just be me but I feel like even the PSP Socom Fireteam Bravo's have more to offer when it comes to gameplay and things to do. With this you just pick up weapons, finish the level with them and then you can use them. I like the idea of the whole leveling weapons to unlock mods, I just wish there was more to it. You can get mod level 5 in 1 mission. It really doesn't add much but it seems pretty neat. Graphically wise it's not too bad either. For some reason I feel like Socom Confrontation looked much better, but that could just be me. Socom's have really never had great graphics when they've come out and this one at the very least follows that trend. I find myself having trouble giving this a 6 or a 7 I feel the game isn't that bad but I feel it really doesn't has as much depth as the other Socom's which is a definitive step back for the series, but there are aspects in the games campaign that I have enjoyed after completing it the first time. Over all this games alright, but at this point I believe fans of the series deserved something better.… Expand
prev
Page:

Awards & Rankings

37
#37 Most Discussed PS3 Game of 2011
36
#36 Most Shared PS3 Game of 2011

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
67

Mixed or average reviews - based on 64 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 23 out of 64
  2. Mixed: 39 out of 64
  3. Negative: 2 out of 64
  1. Playstation Official Magazine Australia
    Oct 6, 2011
    80
    If you have all the accessories to play this game as it is meant to be digested (Move, Sharp Shooter, a decent online connection and four non-idiotic mates on standby for co-op) it's one heck of a good game. Lack even two of those prerequisites though and SOCOM: Special Forces will come across like a fairly standard operation that takes a bit too much liberty with the descriptor 'special'. [June 2011 p68]
  2. Thunderbolt
    Sep 19, 2011
    60
    SOCOM 4 is a light and breezy third-person shooter that's pretty good by genre standards, but perhaps a bit lacking in comparison to SOCOM 2.
    Read full review
  3. Play.tm
    Aug 5, 2011
    69
    This is a decent online shooter with a fairly bland and mildly repetitive single-player component added on.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »