User Score
Generally favorable reviews- based on 41 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 29 out of 41
-
Mixed: 7 out of 41
-
Negative: 5 out of 41
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
JackH.Aug 15, 2008
-
-
Jun 14, 2011
-
AronR.Aug 19, 2008Awesome 2d game. Excellent gameplay. Good difficulty. Excellent soundtrack and a nice twist of humor. Enjoyed it a lot on my PS3.
-
-
MattM.Aug 16, 2008
-
-
MaxB.Aug 13, 2008The best game available to download on both XBLA and PSN to date. The original was an amazing game, but this blows it away in every aspect.
-
-
JusinY.Aug 17, 2008Visually appealing but forgets that most people who played the original are now adults and cannot devote a summer to learning level layouts and mastering difficult controls.
-
-
Mar 3, 2015Lots of variation and polish in enemies, weapons and levels. Boss fights were well thought out and required some thought. Overall, Rearmed sets a high standard for how to update old games.
-
Aug 10, 2015Thank you Grin for a game that will only be truly appreciated by gamers who loved the original Bionic Commando, and consider it a classic, up there with Double Dragon, Commando, 1942 etc.
It's certainly not perfect, but when you consider the reboots of retro games that other companies have made, this does actually achieve what it sets out to with some polish. Well done, Grin. -
Jun 22, 2023Slick reimagining of the arcade classic but many will be put off by the insanely high difficulty level.
Awards & Rankings
-
Edge MagazineA labour of love. The core of the game might be a remake, but the features and polish applied move it beyond the realm of simple cash-ins to one of the finest games to grace PSN or XBLA yet. [Sept 2008, p.92]
-
From top to bottom, Bionic Commando Rearmed is an incredible game that's well worth owning.
-
Play UKA great retro update that may even prove to be better than the next-gen re-imagining currently in the works. [Issue#169, p.91]