User Score
6.0

Mixed or average reviews- based on 657 Ratings

User score distribution:
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. Jun 3, 2023
    7
    The usual decent FPS campaign. Good for one playthrough, but forgettable and sometimes frustrating gameplay makes me not want to revisit it for a second playthrough.
  2. Jul 27, 2022
    3
    A non stop action blockbuster that showboats more than it aims to entertain. I was bored.
  3. Jun 30, 2022
    8
    Oyun güzel ama 2 adet sıkıntı var 1. Hassasiyetle ufak bir sorun var 2. Uçak kullanımı PC göre daha daha zor
  4. Jun 22, 2022
    10
    Since 2016 until today I play the story of this game because it is very good and fun to play. I played multiplayer a few times as I've never been a fan of online games
  5. May 29, 2022
    8
    I'm Miguel, I came from this post because I thought the game was great, there's only one problem with it, the weapons are almost impossible to unlock, you have to earn more points just to unlock a weapon that sometimes isn't even good, and another thing is that when it comes to squeezing each team by itself, there are not many players or bots in the game, it is very annoying and so are theI'm Miguel, I came from this post because I thought the game was great, there's only one problem with it, the weapons are almost impossible to unlock, you have to earn more points just to unlock a weapon that sometimes isn't even good, and another thing is that when it comes to squeezing each team by itself, there are not many players or bots in the game, it is very annoying and so are the hackers, so I give it a score of 8 Expand
  6. May 14, 2022
    6
    The variety of episodes is nice, the gameplay is nice, the graphics are nice, but the difficulty of the game is exaggerated.
  7. Feb 22, 2022
    8
    Let me begin with the singleplayer campaign, which is the main reason this game does not have a 10 from me.

    Don't know how they managed to, but campaign seems to try and make you feel inside the tombstone squad. It kind of actually does, but looks a bit fake. Not to mention the way you get to fights: It seems like Mario or Crash, you enter a room where it is everything already placed
    Let me begin with the singleplayer campaign, which is the main reason this game does not have a 10 from me.

    Don't know how they managed to, but campaign seems to try and make you feel inside the tombstone squad. It kind of actually does, but looks a bit fake. Not to mention the way you get to fights: It seems like Mario or Crash, you enter a room where it is everything already placed up, doesn't feel real, lacks dynamic. Everything else is pretty ok, variety of guns, vehicles, scenario.

    Now for the real thing we all know: Online multiplayer.

    What was good in BF3 online is now even better. The destruction, freedom, shootouts, vehicles engaging, explosions, objective. An excellent diversity of maps, presenting us to a real satisfactive and relaxed gameplay, or the agitation and brutality of a CQB map. Can't say nothing more but simply perfect experience.
    Expand
  8. Nov 19, 2021
    4
    Mediocre Game and an Insult to every BF-Veteran. Still better than 2042 tho. DONT BUY!
  9. Nov 9, 2021
    7
    eu joguei e gostei, a dublagem está fazendo seu papel e pá, porem eu não achei superior ao rival call of duty, porem vale a pena jogar
  10. Sep 26, 2021
    7
    7/10. Battlefield 4- мой первый шутер. Сюжет. В принципе в шутерах сюжет это наверное последнее на что стоит обращать внимание, в поле битвы 4 сюжет чуть лучше среднего, обычный сюжет-боевик.
    Графика. На момент 13-го года графика просто средняя.
    Геймплей. Стрельба и оружие здесь очень хороши, обширное разнообразие оружия, можно садится в танк, стрелять весело и удобно. Напарники.
    7/10. Battlefield 4- мой первый шутер. Сюжет. В принципе в шутерах сюжет это наверное последнее на что стоит обращать внимание, в поле битвы 4 сюжет чуть лучше среднего, обычный сюжет-боевик.
    Графика. На момент 13-го года графика просто средняя.
    Геймплей. Стрельба и оружие здесь очень хороши, обширное разнообразие оружия, можно садится в танк, стрелять весело и удобно. Напарники. Напарники в этой игре это что с чем то,
    несмотря на характер ирландца, во время перестрелки он и остальные напарники это просто камни которые не вносят никакого импакта.
    В жанре шутера это просто хорошая и интересная игра так что изи 7/10.
    Expand
  11. May 31, 2021
    2
    Господи что за графика?! Это полный ужас! Это совсем не то что есть на ПК и PS4, от графики вылезают глаза наружу + ещё разрешение 720p. Я конечно всё понимаю, то что консоль старая, но всё таки...
  12. May 5, 2021
    4
    The fps on this game is trash , the Graphics is Horrible , texture's.... I think ps2 better than that , the pop up on this game is too many , a lot of glitch's on this game especially on campaign, the story and character's of campaign is normal , game play is bad because the frame rate is not stable at ALL!!!!!! , the game play on campaign is Kindest than multiplayer.
  13. Feb 12, 2021
    8
    A good Battlefield game that does not repeat itself. It is still playable, not counting the bugs and repetitive maps.
  14. Feb 7, 2021
    10
    Bought this in 2019 for £0.50. Game got me better at FPS. The online is mostly enjoyable and can get really intense. Modern warfare 2019 has taken alot of great stuff from BF and modernised it. Great game. Pioneering if you ask me.
  15. Jan 2, 2021
    8
    Another finished game in quarantine times.
    So first of all, i have to start with absolutely amazing looking graphics. For a PS3 console ? Its fenomenal. With this is going hand in hand the desctructable enviroment.
    Gameplay is little bit confusing from start, i mean HP system and etc. Annoying enemies with grenade launchers. Medal reward system in campaign is too easy so i was a little
    Another finished game in quarantine times.
    So first of all, i have to start with absolutely amazing looking graphics. For a PS3 console ? Its fenomenal. With this is going hand in hand the desctructable enviroment.

    Gameplay is little bit confusing from start, i mean HP system and etc. Annoying enemies with grenade launchers. Medal reward system in campaign is too easy so i was a little bit dissapointed with this.

    But what is worst in this game (in my opinion) is AI intelligence... its absolutely terrible, Hannah and Irish getting stuck tens meters behind me, because they are staring on enemy, or just shooting on him and dealing no damage. Engage system rarely works, in most times they are just distracting enemies.

    In this point, i would give this game 6/10, but what saves this game is definitely multiplayer. Even on PS3 its still so alive, there is no problem to join immediately to game. It is really addictive and i will come back to it for sure.

    So in the end, im going to give it well deserved 8/10
    Expand
  16. Nov 25, 2020
    7
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. данный отзыв чисто о компании
    1) сюжет прикольный но короткий прошел за два дня,
    2) постоянно баги (миссию на тонущем титане где надо было плавать не мог пройти 20 мин. из за говно-текстур) , помимо этого в игре вы будете много раз проваливаться в текстуры
    3) NPC-противники очень тупые
    4) NPC-команда тоже очень тупые , пока не нажмёшь клавишу Q они противника не увидят и будут стрелять в землю
    5) точность стрельбы в игре просто ублюдство
    6) физика разрушений прикольная
    7) текстуры красивые но их физика говно как говорил ранее постоянно будете через них проваливаться
    8) красивая графика
    ИТОГ: игра очень сырая , поставлю хорошую оценку из за мультиплеера который весьма не плох
    Expand
  17. Sep 9, 2020
    9
    9/10 for the simple fact that the story was, well it definitely wasn't sh*t, but WAY TOO SHORT. I mean you play like 3 hours and you're done, that's sad as hell.
    Anyway, story was decent, this time having China as the main opposing Army, even backed by Russia, which makes we wonder why they decided to make China and Russia enemies in MP, oh well.
    Graphics are superb, even better than
    9/10 for the simple fact that the story was, well it definitely wasn't sh*t, but WAY TOO SHORT. I mean you play like 3 hours and you're done, that's sad as hell.
    Anyway, story was decent, this time having China as the main opposing Army, even backed by Russia, which makes we wonder why they decided to make China and Russia enemies in MP, oh well.
    Graphics are superb, even better than BF3, BUT somehow the engine seems a little of? IDK how to describe it, it just doesn't feel that good compared to BF3. Weapons and sounds are once again in a league of it's own. Loved playing BF4 MP when I was taking a break from GTA Online, sometimes got so obsessed with it I played it months on end. Also a nice addition was different kind of knives instead of the plain Bayonet from BF3, the ACB doesn't count for me since it was Premium only.
    Expand
  18. Jun 19, 2020
    10
    A great game I beat the story a few days ago and mulitplayer is still up and active
  19. May 6, 2020
    8
    After playing BF3, i start to play this game. I submit a review, but today i am going to change my review. This game is stunning. After a little gameplay in this game, i didnt see to much difference than BF3, but now i can see and i can tell you guys this game good as BF3. So, after my hours in the game, I increase my score from 7 to 8.
  20. Mar 18, 2020
    6
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Ah História Te Que é Boa Mas Oh Problema Não é ah Historia (Algumas) Mas Sim Oh Multiplayer Ah Historia é boa (Spoiler) Na Parte Resgata As Pessoas No Apartamento E Subi Até Chegar Helicóptero E Tem Vários Exércitos Quando Vc Morre e fica com tela e carregando so tem um problema quando vc carrega ele fica infinitamente e ouço barulho de tiro e etc. ou seja Carrego Oh Jogo só que não ta mostrando a historia eu posso se mexer atirar fazer tudo com tela preta carrgando esse é um bug chato do jogo e agora vamos ao multiplayer, gosto so joga 1 mapa que é operação fronteira quando jogando pela partida tem inimigo perto de mim e essas coisas quando eu quero joga uma granada, eu jogo ah granada 1 segundo depois e morre ele não explode fico com raiva por caso disso sempre acontece isso, os glitch ou hack não sei que o cara fica agachado boneco parado ele consegue atirar por exemplo ele ta de costa vc pode mata ele facilmente pq ele ta de costa eae do nada ele mata vc msm oh boneco estando de costa. oh multiplayer do battlefield e bugado e hack tbm ao mesmo tempo mas e bom jogar ele. Expand
  21. Sep 16, 2019
    0
    there are so many superior war games out there, the censorship and pandering killed the battlefield series
  22. Aug 4, 2018
    7
    Понравилось, но как-то не очнь в плане управления.
  23. Apr 19, 2017
    5
    Boring campaign multiplayer still has problems. Rubberbanding, hit detection getting killed by giy with 0℅ **** health this game sucks bad and is embarrement ever since ea tried to compete with cod they killed battlefield
  24. Sep 17, 2016
    6
    EA는 들어라...그렇게 playstation3가 어려워?배틀필드4는 pc, 차세대 기종은 좋지만 현세대 기종들은 문제가 많다..예를 들면..탱크를 탔을때 조준경을 확대하면 조준경이 계속 아주 약간씩 움직이고,grass가 있는땅인 고퀄리티 텍스쳐를 보게 되면 가끔씩 화면이 번쩍이거나,또한 텍스쳐가 갑자기 사라지거나 깜빡이는 등 에다가 좋지않은 그래픽 등 대충만든 표시가 난다..EA는 들어라...그렇게 playstation3가 어려워?배틀필드4는 pc, 차세대 기종은 좋지만 현세대 기종들은 문제가 많다..예를 들면..탱크를 탔을때 조준경을 확대하면 조준경이 계속 아주 약간씩 움직이고,grass가 있는땅인 고퀄리티 텍스쳐를 보게 되면 가끔씩 화면이 번쩍이거나,또한 텍스쳐가 갑자기 사라지거나 깜빡이는 등 에다가 좋지않은 그래픽 등 대충만든 표시가 난다..
  25. Aug 31, 2016
    9
    On PC this game is relay Crap , but on PS 3 is a great experience only with minor graphic glitchis and sound problem wen the map load for the first time otherwise epic multiplayer FPS.
  26. Jun 30, 2016
    7
    Um jogo competente,gráficos bonitos e a jogabilidade que todos conhecem,um ponto negativo foi a campanha...muito curta,apesar de saber que é um jogo focado no multiplayer,mesmo assim deveria ser mais extenso o modo singleplayer.
  27. Dec 1, 2015
    5
    great potential, BUT... a study in frustration: I play solo campaigns, and when tucking behind the corner of a wall for cover, a "team member" almost always jumps in front, blocking my line of sight...whoever thought this up is a MORON. Also, in a firefight, team members almost never seem to "have your back" when enemies blind-side you, come up from behind, etc.: team members with a cleargreat potential, BUT... a study in frustration: I play solo campaigns, and when tucking behind the corner of a wall for cover, a "team member" almost always jumps in front, blocking my line of sight...whoever thought this up is a MORON. Also, in a firefight, team members almost never seem to "have your back" when enemies blind-side you, come up from behind, etc.: team members with a clear line of sight on enemy never seem to shoot at them, and are generally terrible shots... virtually useless. I like a challenging game, but both the Battlefields I've bought are more frustrating than challenging. Expand
  28. Nov 29, 2015
    4
    I decided to try out BF4 after playing BF3, which was a pretty decent game besides the short campaign. Well, let me just say that it was a pretty big disappointment. I think I literally said "this game sucks" within the first 45 minutes.

    THE BAD: **** enemy Ai -Your teammates don't do anything half of the time, even when you command them too -The Killzone 3-esque takedown command
    I decided to try out BF4 after playing BF3, which was a pretty decent game besides the short campaign. Well, let me just say that it was a pretty big disappointment. I think I literally said "this game sucks" within the first 45 minutes.

    THE BAD:

    **** enemy Ai
    -Your teammates don't do anything half of the time, even when you command them too
    -The Killzone 3-esque takedown command doesn't work well. at times it takes your character 5 seconds to take down a guy which is a long time when you have dozens of guys shooting at you
    -There isn't a lot of instruction on where to go
    -I noticed 2D characters on the street that didn't even move (wtf?)
    -The controls don't work as well as they did in Bf3 (where is the prone command and why do I fall off ladders all the time? Should have been more thought out)
    -Weak storyline
    -Immemorable characters

    THE GOOD:
    -Pretty good graphics
    -Some well written dialogue
    -Nice level design
    -Multiplayer is decent, but not as good as the Bad Company series or BF3

    Overall, why did they mess with a good thing? BF3 worked; this game doesn't. I'm a Battlefield fan, more so than COD, but I'd say go get Black ops instead.
    Expand
  29. Nov 22, 2015
    5
    Well guys i really like the game the graphics are good plus the sounds r good hell even the multiplayer i enjoy playing besides there is one thing that i hate about the game is that the game on the multiplayer keeps on glitching were i cant move at all but i can shoot my gun but i cant kill anyone but the ppl can kill me and i cant do anything about it which pisses me off if they fix thisWell guys i really like the game the graphics are good plus the sounds r good hell even the multiplayer i enjoy playing besides there is one thing that i hate about the game is that the game on the multiplayer keeps on glitching were i cant move at all but i can shoot my gun but i cant kill anyone but the ppl can kill me and i cant do anything about it which pisses me off if they fix this than ill enjoy the game a lot more Expand
  30. Sep 21, 2015
    6
    This game is only good in hardcore mode. in hardcore mode it is fair. because when in hard core mode, when the player dies it's their fault. They were in the wrong place at the wrong time because they weren't being strategic. And when the player get's a kill it's fair because they were using strategy.

    The "normal" game modes however are not good at all. For one thing normal game modes
    This game is only good in hardcore mode. in hardcore mode it is fair. because when in hard core mode, when the player dies it's their fault. They were in the wrong place at the wrong time because they weren't being strategic. And when the player get's a kill it's fair because they were using strategy.

    The "normal" game modes however are not good at all. For one thing normal game modes have been dumbed down for the 6 year olds who play this game. Health regeneration is painfully slow, so it's common that a player will find themselves in the situation of having next to no health, and then getting into an engagement with an enemy player that has 100 percent health. This is not fair at all and it's obviously because that EA obviously thinks that all the players are mentally slow people who get frustrated when any sort of challenge comes out of the game.

    The campaign of this game is not anything to get excited about. the story is not solid and makes no sense. and the campaign only lasts 4 hours. So it's probably not a good idea to come into this game expecting a 5 star campaign experience.

    All in all, it's really important to understand that the hardcore game modes are the best here. The normal game modes, like said earlier, pander to the 4 and 5 year olds who play this game. And again, the campaign mode is nothing to get excited about
    Expand
  31. Sep 2, 2015
    4
    Oh dear God....This game... A little note before I begin. This is a review for the PS3 game. I hope to whatever god that's out there that the PS4, Xbone, and PC versions are much better than this.

    Pros: *Personal one* SCAR-H is now an assault rifle and not a carbine. Thank you for fixing that. "Levolution" Is a wonderful showcase of the new frostbite engine The Blue tint from BF3 is
    Oh dear God....This game... A little note before I begin. This is a review for the PS3 game. I hope to whatever god that's out there that the PS4, Xbone, and PC versions are much better than this.

    Pros:
    *Personal one* SCAR-H is now an assault rifle and not a carbine. Thank you for fixing that.
    "Levolution" Is a wonderful showcase of the new frostbite engine
    The Blue tint from BF3 is gone, thank GOD.
    Lots and lots of customizable options, including creating your own emblem
    Buttloads of weapons
    Buttloads of vehicles
    Good maps
    Is different enough than BF3
    Battlelog system is a great resource for stats and stuff.

    Cons: (The cons break this game so much that I'm making each con a paragraph)
    - The campaign: Not only is it boring and cliche as hell, but it's simply broken! It never saves your game, so when you turn it off for the night, and come back to play the next morning, all your progress is gone. Apparently this has been an issue since launch and it still hasn't been fixed. It's also buggy as well, with Ladders proving to be your worst enemy, and NPCs will clip through you and your teammates. Also, sometimes, when you die, the screen will just stay black with that annoying little blinking light at the top, whilist you're actually dropped back into combat. the only way to fix it is to restart your system, and as mentioned before, you then lose all the data.
    -Performance: This game was obviously not meant to be played on the old gen consoles. Frames are all over the place, textures are bland and low res, (looking worse than BF3) but the biggest offender is the rendering of key elements like...Enemy soldiers, your guns, and the iron sights of said gun. I've lost count of how many times I spawn into a new server, everything looks crappy low res while it all loads and I get shot from an enemy who was actually right in front of me but hasn't rendered yet, making him invisible. Then he renders in a couple seconds later. Same with your weapons. Spawn in, enemy in front of you, gun hasn't loaded in yet, and the enemy spins around and blows your defenseless a** sky high. And exactly the same problem with the iron sights not loading in when you pull them up, the sights just look like a solid piece with no hole to look through, making them useless. and while you figure that out/wait for it to load, the enemy kills you. The menu also never remembers what's a new unlock and what isn't. So I constantly get that orange triangle that means "New item!", but it turns out it's the default camo of the gun I'm using. You know, the one you start with? Also....why change the controls???? The old controls were spot on and logical. I was at least able to fix the infantry controls, but vehicle controls remain a mystery for me.
    -Battlepacks and their unlocks: This was...the absolute...worst idea for an unlock system...ever devised. Not only is what you get completely random. Not only is some of the stuff you get for weapons you don't have. Not only are the camos you get stupid looking, they charge MONEY for these. Absolutely disgraceful. Also, the battlepack attachments are pretty much useless. They're just reskinned attachments you get normally. Stubby grip reduces the automatic fire penalty by 15%. Potato grip does the exact same thing and looks downright stupid. The soldier camos you get are bad because with the weird lighting and bad textures, you can hardly make out any difference in the soldiers appearance. Also, you can get knives from this. Why are we copying CS:GO?
    Also, there's no "customize" option in the main menu. you actually have to go into a match or the new "Test range" to change up your class.

    Don't get this game for PS3. If you don't mind the battlepack system, get it for PS4/Xbone/PC. I'm sure it'll run a lot better/actually be fixed. This game is good, but it's just downright broken on old gen. Don't waste your money for the PS3 version.
    Expand
  32. Jan 1, 2015
    8
    It's been a year since BF4 came out and I finally got hands on it. This is due to the many glitches that were plaguing the game, especially multiplayer. And in the midst of all this, EA was releasing DLC after DLC for the game. How can you do that and not fix the fundamentals. Is it any wonder why I didn't buy the game on release? But it really paid off, because after a year, I not onlyIt's been a year since BF4 came out and I finally got hands on it. This is due to the many glitches that were plaguing the game, especially multiplayer. And in the midst of all this, EA was releasing DLC after DLC for the game. How can you do that and not fix the fundamentals. Is it any wonder why I didn't buy the game on release? But it really paid off, because after a year, I not only got a fixed game, but I got the Premium Edition. So for all who are laughing at me because I'm late to the party, I spent half of what many of you spent for the full game and all DLC. Joke is on you.

    But on to the game. First the campaign. Playing BF for the campaign is like going to an amusement park just for the popcorn; it's not the main feature. At the same time however, BF is about being a frontline soldier, and here, you're a special ops member. It doesn't fit. I finished this game on hard and never played it again. Now to the online. Yes, it's almost like BF3 (yet better), but they really did some work. First the Levolution. It's where the environment changes and it feels like a new map. Sometimes it's player-triggered and sometimes it's the weather. Some command posts (usually B) are on structures and can be destroyed. What I didn't like however are the battlepacks. Sometimes they can unlock attachments way too early. I know there are items you can only unlock with packs but many are the same as the default attachments. They look different, but acts the same. Like for example, the default red-dot sight you unlock by XP is Russian-made; the Chinese red-dot can only be unlocked with a battlepack but it's possible to get it before its Russian counterpart, removing the need to unlock the default red dot. See what I mean?

    In the end though, the game is fun. If you like BF3, then you'll LOVE this.
    Expand
  33. Dec 29, 2014
    9
    this is one of the few games which I was addicted too , It had stunning visuals , Epic levolution and most impotently it had one of the best gameplay I ever witnessed . The story on the other hand wasn't that good but it was still better then CoD's storyline , with the CoD cliche voice acting and its terrible plot , while BF4 on the other hand tries to at least not be a terrible clichéthis is one of the few games which I was addicted too , It had stunning visuals , Epic levolution and most impotently it had one of the best gameplay I ever witnessed . The story on the other hand wasn't that good but it was still better then CoD's storyline , with the CoD cliche voice acting and its terrible plot , while BF4 on the other hand tries to at least not be a terrible cliché like CoD . Anyway I give it a NINE because of the storyline but overall its an epic and exciting Fps game ! Expand
  34. Dec 21, 2014
    6
    Teams of 10-12 players conquering the large, exotic maps, that sort of stuff makes the game fun for a dozen hours. Few players used their headsets, but teamwork was still possible. Some maps are DLC and I didn't play those. I would say the game is enjoyable enough without DLC. The different game modes each can make one map feel like several, because the goal changes your approach to theTeams of 10-12 players conquering the large, exotic maps, that sort of stuff makes the game fun for a dozen hours. Few players used their headsets, but teamwork was still possible. Some maps are DLC and I didn't play those. I would say the game is enjoyable enough without DLC. The different game modes each can make one map feel like several, because the goal changes your approach to the map. I went directly for the multiplayer and kept playing compulsively for around 40 hours. Then I played the campaign. I regret playing the campaign, let me just put it like that.

    The reason why the game only receives a mildly positive score: I feel like I wasted time, not learning anything. The player profiles could have been more personalized, with short 'soldier biographies' or whatever. There could have been a team-finder function where you could compete in online tournaments or something. I felt that the primary reason I kept playing was to unlock a few trophies and see what the unlockable weapons would be like. They weren't that much different, though, and I can hardly see myself returning for more rounds now that I finished the campaign and have played all maps and most modes. Been there, done that. It feels weird to not have access to planes, BTW, they are seemingly only in the DLC. And if there were only a handful of players in a match, the maps were mostly empty stretches.
    Expand
  35. Dec 16, 2014
    0
    Purchased this Nov 2014 from Amazon for $15 USD assuming that you can't go wrong for that price. I was wrong (PS3 Version).

    The first thing I noticed were the graphics; they appear to be late '90's or early 2000's graphics (Multiplayer). For instance, there are fork lifts in the game. Dice rendered the "wheels" not as circles, but as body color hexagons. Yes, that's right. The wheels of
    Purchased this Nov 2014 from Amazon for $15 USD assuming that you can't go wrong for that price. I was wrong (PS3 Version).

    The first thing I noticed were the graphics; they appear to be late '90's or early 2000's graphics (Multiplayer). For instance, there are fork lifts in the game. Dice rendered the "wheels" not as circles, but as body color hexagons. Yes, that's right. The wheels of the fork lifts are the same pink color as the body of the forklift, and they're not even round. Yes, that is what you can look forward too. Games like Unreal Tournament or Doom 3 have superior graphics to this game. Yes - no lie.

    Then we talk about controls: on the PS3, the controls are very sloppy, slow, and clunky. They tried to address it with patches and updates, and while it is improved based on what it was, it is still a far cry from other PS3 FPS games. IE- both Bad Company games, and BF3 have superior controls. And while I'm not a huge fan of CoD, that series also has superior controls (oh, and graphics as well). Further, they also decided to revamp the buttons and layout. After 5-6 years of Battlefield games for PS3, they changed everything, so now your existing muscle memory will conflict with this game, meaning, if you actually do manage to see your opponent before they see you, you will likely hit select (to spot them) only to have the game freeze up on your end, as it brings you in to the menu. You will then subsequently die, as it takes about 8 seconds to exit the menu again. Now, should you survive that mistake, you will go to shoot your target, only to either A) Spot them (now spotting occurs by using the trigger), or B) lob a grenade. Of course, you can change the settings in the menu, but they are all pre-programmed layouts (like Goldeneye on N64), and none of them actually match any setting previously found in a Battlefield game on PS3...but you can maybe get past that.

    Now, assuming your brain can translate the imagery on screen (it's tough, I haven't seen graphics like these in roughly 15 years), and assuming you survive long enough to make it to a vehicle, you will again be greeted by new controls, and terrible graphics. If you're in a jet, 90% of the screen will be covered with canopy lines and buttons...because that's what a pilot sees. Lines and buttons...but if you manage to find yourself in a tank, you'll find it mostly useless, mostly because every button you've been conditioned to press, will do something else. Meaning, once again, you have to wade into the settings to try and find a layout that works. "Veteran" is the one they suggest if you have played battlefield before, yet if still doesn't match any settings that ever existed, so really it should be called "Close Enough" because it's not actually what we did use, but it's close enough.

    Finally, points and leveling up; this game will make you feel special. Ok, not special in a good way, but rather in a specifically insulting way. For instance: Did you shoot at someone, and not even hit them? POINTS! Did you play a round of Conquest?! POINTS! Literally anything you do, you get points. If your squad mate spawns off of you, you get points. This game might literally be the first game in the history of gaming, where you can get points simply by turning the game on, and leaving your character to sit. Which is actually a reasonable tactic, since the graphics are so poor it's likely the enemy won't see you unless you move.

    Which leads me to my next point: matchmaking. You would think that using "quick join" would allow you to select a certain map, and then join in to any random match of that map....no, you can't. So if you purchase an expansion map, it's entirely possible you will never ever play that map, via quick join. Which is too bad, because the server browser seems to cause glitches quite frequently, either your PS3 locks up, or it reports there are no games. Or you have to spend 2-5 minutes filtering all the maps and modes you do and don't want.

    Ok, maps: It seems that the graphics are so crippling, that you can generally find one spot, and pitch a tent, and your enemies will blindly run at you multiple times, to no avail. Perhaps they can't see you? Just get a big gun with a large magazine, and sit down for the whole match, and you'll probably lead your team to victory and/or will be the points leader.

    Sound: the sound is terrible, not even worth talking about, not sure how they went backward considering many of these weapons already existed, thus already had been previously recorded, meaning they somehow intentionally messed up...

    Don't waste your time or money on this game for PS3, maybe it's better on a different platform.
    Expand
  36. Nov 23, 2014
    8
    (Review is online based)
    Now that a lot of time has passed, this game is actually very playable. Most of the bugs have been fixed, and most glitches only happen while the match is barely starting. Other than loading bugs, there shouldn't be any major glitches getting in the way of the online experience. I think most people only hate on the game because of the bugs, rather than the
    (Review is online based)
    Now that a lot of time has passed, this game is actually very playable. Most of the bugs have been fixed, and most glitches only happen while the match is barely starting. Other than loading bugs, there shouldn't be any major glitches getting in the way of the online experience. I think most people only hate on the game because of the bugs, rather than the gameplay. There have been many enjoyable moments in BF4 online, such as parachuting from the building of Siege of Shanghai to get to a bomb on Obliteration, or rigging a PWC with C4, and driving it into a DV-15 watercraft. The customization in the game has a very good variety of guns, paints, and camouflage. Switching from CoD to Battlefield, I can say my online experience has been a lot more pleasant. This is coming from someone who has bought every single CoD from 2007-2013. I would recommend Battlefield 4 to anyone looking for an FPS game.
    Downsides: When you switch classes, it sometimes takes a while to load your class, which can be very annoying when you spawn in on a gunfight. Rubber banding seems to be a big issue if your connection isn't good. The amount of people who have blue tooth headsets could be higher, and the map loading time can be frustrating sometimes. Graphics on pilots seem a bit funny. If these were on PS4, Xbox One, or PC, I would give it a 9.
    Expand
  37. Oct 6, 2014
    6
    It's like they took all the wonderful things of battlefield 3 and threw them on the ground and stepped on it and served it for 60$. What happened to the wonderful setting and fun of battlefield 3?
  38. Oct 3, 2014
    7
    Battlefield 4 in my opinion is every way better than battlefield 3. This game is kind of buggy, and the dealbreaker for me was the lost saves during the campaign, but that was the only major problem I've ran into. The campaign was surprising pretty good, especially the characters as they had great personalities, and made the sp worth playing. Multiplayer-wise, I feel like it's easier toBattlefield 4 in my opinion is every way better than battlefield 3. This game is kind of buggy, and the dealbreaker for me was the lost saves during the campaign, but that was the only major problem I've ran into. The campaign was surprising pretty good, especially the characters as they had great personalities, and made the sp worth playing. Multiplayer-wise, I feel like it's easier to pick up and play, just feels like they nerfed the difficulty by a lot especially the recoil of the guns (which for me was good). However it still feels very barebones to me, even with vehicular combat, and honestly don't plan to sink a lot of hours of this multiplayer (to me gets boring fast). So basically a good (but short) campaign, with an ok multiplayer makes this an ok game for me. I'm more into the arcade military shooters (especially for multiplayer), but if you like hardcore military shooters, check this game out, Expand
  39. Sep 27, 2014
    8
    No es Battlefield 3, pero la experiencia sigue siendo muy buena. Pero eso si, en PS3 hay muchos aspectos descuidados (lo peor las congelaciones). Si arreglaran eso junto con algún que otro fallo en el multijugador sería una experiencia mas redonda. No se porqué quitaron el modo coop. pero da igual, el online lo compensa. La campaña está bastante bien, aunque han reducido demasiado laNo es Battlefield 3, pero la experiencia sigue siendo muy buena. Pero eso si, en PS3 hay muchos aspectos descuidados (lo peor las congelaciones). Si arreglaran eso junto con algún que otro fallo en el multijugador sería una experiencia mas redonda. No se porqué quitaron el modo coop. pero da igual, el online lo compensa. La campaña está bastante bien, aunque han reducido demasiado la dificultad. Expand
  40. Aug 27, 2014
    6
    i'm not a hard core BF player but it seems that the games are getting better as they progress, An improvement from BF3 for sure, and way better than BF2. i mean i rather play "COD ghost" because it's faster paced but this tactical game has it's moments.

    I feel the vehicle controls are a bit harder making the game require a little more skill, as in BF3 the pilot could be a half blind
    i'm not a hard core BF player but it seems that the games are getting better as they progress, An improvement from BF3 for sure, and way better than BF2. i mean i rather play "COD ghost" because it's faster paced but this tactical game has it's moments.

    I feel the vehicle controls are a bit harder making the game require a little more skill, as in BF3 the pilot could be a half blind monkey that has a bad case of flees, while in BF4 everything is a bit more sophisticated and flashy but has the same main structure as BF3.

    Tips: If your on foot your dead. (find a vehicle)
    don't fly a jet their slower than BF4.

    overal this is a game that you may buy or may not. their are better games out there and worse, i suggest renting it before you play it. 5.8/10
    Expand
  41. Aug 24, 2014
    5
    This game could easily earn it´s score of 80, if EA would give Dice a little bit more time to fix the glitches, but sadly all the time of Dice is going on BF Hardline and DLC:s
  42. Aug 12, 2014
    8
    This game looks and feels amazing on the current generation consoles, and it's serious, breathtaking multiplayer works great along side a stellar, thoroughly engaging campaign. It's a much more impressive game then "Call of Duty: Ghosts", which debuted a month after BF4. The scale of sheer destruction and freedom that the Multiplayer aspects of the game provide is unprecedented, and aThis game looks and feels amazing on the current generation consoles, and it's serious, breathtaking multiplayer works great along side a stellar, thoroughly engaging campaign. It's a much more impressive game then "Call of Duty: Ghosts", which debuted a month after BF4. The scale of sheer destruction and freedom that the Multiplayer aspects of the game provide is unprecedented, and a whole lot of fun. Get this game, not "Ghosts". The graphics, story-line, and multiplayer beat the tar out of the latest installment in a stagnant franchise. Expand
  43. Jul 29, 2014
    0
    This game is broken, the graphics are pathetic, the story is mediocre and that's it. Everything sucks about this game, i'd stick to BF3 if I were you.
  44. Jul 26, 2014
    1
    Played the game for two days then went back to palying BF3 . Maps, Weapons and vehicles all suck. The game glitches/freezes all the time. Played through like half of the campaign then came one day and the game started me from the beginning. Absolutely useless waste of money. Max 24 players on PS3 makes it all the more stupid.
  45. Jul 21, 2014
    5
    SP:
    Campaign was too short, too easy (even on Hard) and was just boring. The missions felt rushed, empty, and really lacked creativity. Easily one of the worst campaigns I've played.
    MP: Levolution was a feature was pretty cool when I first started playing, but it quickly became bland and boring after a while. Hit detection is incredibly bad, weapons seem imbalanced and the
    SP:
    Campaign was too short, too easy (even on Hard) and was just boring. The missions felt rushed, empty, and really lacked creativity. Easily one of the worst campaigns I've played.

    MP:
    Levolution was a feature was pretty cool when I first started playing, but it quickly became bland and boring after a while. Hit detection is incredibly bad, weapons seem imbalanced and the controls are awkward. The entire game is filled with a slew of bugs and glitches that make the game less enjoyable.

    If you're going for Battlefield: Hardline, you might as well stay on BF3 or BF4. Knowing EA DICE, it'll be just as buggy and just as bad.
    Expand
  46. Jul 17, 2014
    6
    1st of all no I will not compare it to cod at all. Well at release it was buggy crap but now its sort of stable. its playable but has bugs and glitches still. the story is missing when, what, and why, also you have to play it to get all the guns in multiplayer. the multiplayer is good its not mind blowing but its good my main issue is that if your in a building with invincible walls you1st of all no I will not compare it to cod at all. Well at release it was buggy crap but now its sort of stable. its playable but has bugs and glitches still. the story is missing when, what, and why, also you have to play it to get all the guns in multiplayer. the multiplayer is good its not mind blowing but its good my main issue is that if your in a building with invincible walls you can easily camp or be camp over and over. Also why do support get LMGs and only support? Also if you don't have an origin account no battle log. Expand
  47. Jun 30, 2014
    0
    im laughing at the morons who said they like this game with their dumb reviews, the company who made this game doesn't give a **** about the customers just money, so the more you keep buying their games the more you'll grippe about bugs, and crashing, so pretty much your liking a game whos company has no respect for it's customers?!?
  48. Jun 17, 2014
    0
    This game is a piece of sh*t! Almost 8 months after release, this game is HORRIBLE on the PS3, plus, DICE doesnt give a f*ck about fixing the game on the older generation consoles and we ended up playing a $60 PRE ALPHA game! For God sake, If you want to buy It on the PS3, DONT! Stay back of this game! With MINECRAFT PS3 edition, you will have more fun. I am so disappointed... SHAME ONThis game is a piece of sh*t! Almost 8 months after release, this game is HORRIBLE on the PS3, plus, DICE doesnt give a f*ck about fixing the game on the older generation consoles and we ended up playing a $60 PRE ALPHA game! For God sake, If you want to buy It on the PS3, DONT! Stay back of this game! With MINECRAFT PS3 edition, you will have more fun. I am so disappointed... SHAME ON YOU EA/DICE. Expand
  49. Jun 16, 2014
    0
    the worst game ever! graphics are ugly textures are really bad. online is THE SAME with BATTLEFIELD 3 oh battlefield 3 is better..better graphics better textures better and funnier online and better campaing cod ghost is much better and much funnier i dont trust more ea games
  50. Jun 10, 2014
    8
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Battlefield 4 is much better than Battlefield 3, and it has been a major improvement, like the Levolution, guns look a bit better, character animations are awesome and the most realistic I've seen. Combine this with a very good gameplay which is partially connected to the multiplayer you get an AWESOME game. But, there are a few things which have annoyed me: if you kill someone in Singleplayer with a sniper rifle closer than 2m their guns fly off 20m into the sky... I mean it's funny but come on, are sniper rifles so overpowered?! And also the "failed" checkpoint system. Why am I saying failed? Because it saves the game when I have an enemy gun pointed from behind to my head and I have about 5 health points? Or maybe when I fall off a cliff or I fall off a dam and it saves the game when I am at the bottom and I have to restart the mission? It's a great game overall and it's worth buying it but it has a lot of these minor flaws that just distract you. Expand
  51. Jun 5, 2014
    1
    The would be a lot more fun if every 5 minutes it didn't make the freaking ps3 crash. I have had this game for 3 months now and it has crashed my ps3 at least 100 hundred times. This has been happening to everyone so I recommend anyone buys this until they fix it!
  52. Jun 3, 2014
    0
    I have been engrossed in Battlefield online play for years now. I originally played the Battlefield 1942 on PC and have been a long standing fan of the games. HOWEVER...The new Battlefield is a complete disappointment. A half-ass story line and the online play is complete garbage. Don't waste your time. Or money! Graphics are a joke in online play. The original pac man has better graphicsI have been engrossed in Battlefield online play for years now. I originally played the Battlefield 1942 on PC and have been a long standing fan of the games. HOWEVER...The new Battlefield is a complete disappointment. A half-ass story line and the online play is complete garbage. Don't waste your time. Or money! Graphics are a joke in online play. The original pac man has better graphics than this. However, if you feel the need to blow $60 for only HALF of the available maps, go right ahead. Then drop another $60 to get the other half of the maps. This game is a rip off and a money pit. The game designers need to restart from ground 0. Expand
  53. May 25, 2014
    0
    this game is awful I hate it played it for 15 minutes and got sick of all the bull graphics overall a boring game battle field 3 was a much better game than this piece of ****
  54. May 21, 2014
    8
    this game is a suberb title in the battlefield francise and rightfully so every thing was improved but the sh*t launch and servers are big problems first lets get the singleplayer campain out of the way as the last games staory to put it bluntly was SH****T but thankfully ea have listened to us and have poured more effort into it the story is your simple trying to prevent world war 3 andthis game is a suberb title in the battlefield francise and rightfully so every thing was improved but the sh*t launch and servers are big problems first lets get the singleplayer campain out of the way as the last games staory to put it bluntly was SH****T but thankfully ea have listened to us and have poured more effort into it the story is your simple trying to prevent world war 3 and the charecters well tets just say at least i remember their names the graphics as always is amazing but be honest with yourself you buy this game for the multiplayer and this is both an amzing experience and a struggle with the **** realese this game needs to be over hauled and the amount of times the official servers have crashed my console is unforgiveble but to its fairness if you can get into a server with no problems or having to wait in ques then this game is awsome playing this game only is a spectacle with 64 players on pc and next gen and 24 players on current gen it trumps call of duty in battle sizes and then theirs the massive maps which can require vehicles but normally you can spawn on a squad mate commander mode from bad company 2 is back and adds a rts feel to the game but the fact you have to be level 10 is not fair a new feature is battlepacks which give you weopon camos attachments and xp boosts you unlock them via ranking up but you could get an attachment for a gun you are far from unlocking also leveloutions are a new feature taking map destruction to a hole new level being able to knock down a building is amazing and is far better than call of dutys simple destruction this game is amazing but needs to be straitend out even upgrading the servers could do and not just maintenece the game is a must buy but just wait a bit before you buy it to give ea and dice some time to fix the servers i hope to see a new battlefield game soon if its like this with out the problems so i will see you guys latrer Expand
  55. May 6, 2014
    7
    My previous review was a little bad, so i will fix it now. This game is still very good, a lot better than Call of Duty: Ghosts. A few glitches but i still enjoy playing it.
  56. Apr 30, 2014
    5
    too many rendering glitches on PS3, paid the 10 bucks so i could play it on my PS4 and now it does fantastic, so just play it or upgrade it to the PS4 cuz the PS3 just gives you bugs and glitches all day.

    examples, some areas i would go into would have shadows from light going on and off, i would run up to some bystanders on the street and they would still look like they havent loaded
    too many rendering glitches on PS3, paid the 10 bucks so i could play it on my PS4 and now it does fantastic, so just play it or upgrade it to the PS4 cuz the PS3 just gives you bugs and glitches all day.

    examples, some areas i would go into would have shadows from light going on and off, i would run up to some bystanders on the street and they would still look like they havent loaded in yet like i was 50 feet away and then i slowly watched them get more defined, same thing with a bookcase, was blurry and couldnt see anything and then it slowly loaded and became a bookcase.

    all those problems are gone now that i play it on the PS4 so just buy it and play it on that, i hope you are not currently stuck with it on the PS3
    Expand
  57. Apr 27, 2014
    0
    This game is rubbish how on earth it got any rating above 3 stars is beyond me. The single player is heartless and boring but no- one buys it for campaign mode anyhow. The multiplayer is the big attraction but this fails miserably. There are so many glitches crashes and poor performance issues in general I wish I had bought COD instead so long dice and ea thats the last bit of my moneyThis game is rubbish how on earth it got any rating above 3 stars is beyond me. The single player is heartless and boring but no- one buys it for campaign mode anyhow. The multiplayer is the big attraction but this fails miserably. There are so many glitches crashes and poor performance issues in general I wish I had bought COD instead so long dice and ea thats the last bit of my money you will see Expand
  58. Apr 17, 2014
    2
    Multiplayer was fine.
    But Campaign... in that dam mission where you jump on the scaffolding there was a game breaking bug. went on youtube and there was even a video. Had to replay mission. DICE you used to be top notch. but now EA has you pumping out a sequel every 2 years a la Call of Duty style and quality has dropped. Even though Activision gets criticised for their repetitive
    Multiplayer was fine.
    But Campaign... in that dam mission where you jump on the scaffolding there was a game breaking bug. went on youtube and there was even a video. Had to replay mission. DICE you used to be top notch. but now EA has you pumping out a sequel every 2 years a la Call of Duty style and quality has dropped. Even though Activision gets criticised for their repetitive gameplay at least they don't have these game breaking bugs.

    That's not even mentioning the hostile portrayal of the Chinese in the Campaign lol. Civil war in China with the Yanks interefering of course. At least they get one part right, Americans interfering with other countries' affairs but DICE portrays Chinese as warmongers intent on starting WWIII. Irony much. Sweden's DICE why must you behave as america's lapdog.
    Expand
  59. Apr 7, 2014
    8
    I love the Battlefield franchise. I only started playing at Battlefield 3, but loved the game from the beginning. Battlefield 4, on the other hand, I have mixed feelings about. The game is fun and stays true to it's roots, mostly. Some of the cons I saw in this game were Battlepacks, which make unlocking camos, attachments, xp boosts, etc a lot harder. Don't even get me started on EAI love the Battlefield franchise. I only started playing at Battlefield 3, but loved the game from the beginning. Battlefield 4, on the other hand, I have mixed feelings about. The game is fun and stays true to it's roots, mostly. Some of the cons I saw in this game were Battlepacks, which make unlocking camos, attachments, xp boosts, etc a lot harder. Don't even get me started on EA Online. To put it in short, it doesn't work. The game itself is amazing. With stellar graphics, 64 player online on PC and next-gen consoles, the list goes on and on. The on thing that brought my score down was the launch. When the game first launched, it was so broken. The game lagged, kicked you out of matches, and rubber-banding was everywhere. It was just not worth the $60 price tag at launch. Since then, it has gotten much better with a lot less lag and barely any rubber-banding. It does still kick you out of matches often which is a major annoyance. Overall, Battlefield 4 is a great title, with a few kinks. Expand
  60. Mar 23, 2014
    8
    I would give this game a 9 if it wasn't crashing my ps3 most of the time i'm playing. When it's working well, it's a really addictive multiplayer game that you will want to keep playing one last game after another.
  61. Mar 18, 2014
    7
    Just to be clear on my review, I didn't bother with the single player, as there was few effort put into that of BF3 to my experience and I read it was the same thing with BF4, so I spent my time on multiplayer.
    Now, the multiplayer is pretty good, but all in all I find the experience VERY similar to that of BF3. Just other weapons and slightly bigger maps. BF4 online servers are OK but
    Just to be clear on my review, I didn't bother with the single player, as there was few effort put into that of BF3 to my experience and I read it was the same thing with BF4, so I spent my time on multiplayer.
    Now, the multiplayer is pretty good, but all in all I find the experience VERY similar to that of BF3. Just other weapons and slightly bigger maps. BF4 online servers are OK but not fantastic as per stability and bugs (I still fell through a map or had a few gamefreezes). There has been a lot of talk about levolution in BF4, but I can't say I wasn't overwhelmed with what I saw...
    So all in all, if you have the option, go for BF3, it's the better game at the moment at the lower price.
    Expand
  62. Mar 6, 2014
    0
    the freezing problem is just unbelievable. I spend 70 euros on a game that I cannot play five minutes without the game freezing. every other game on my PS3 runs smoothly. I seriously suggest that you consider sticking with BF3.
  63. Mar 6, 2014
    1
    This game was clearly released before it was even close to being finished. It's been over 5 months and it's still a buggy mess. I can barely get through a match without it locking up my PS3. I've been a BF fan for a long time, but DICE/EA really dropped the ball on this one. Stay away from it.
  64. Mar 6, 2014
    5
    The campaign is terrible. But, that's not why I bought it. Multiplayer is Ok and the maps are cool, the problem is you can't play for more than 30-40 min without the game crashing and freezing your ps3 forcing you to turn it off. THIS IS A HUGE problem with this game. EA or DICE should do something about it. Before you buy this game, google Battlefield 4 freezing ps3 or something similar,The campaign is terrible. But, that's not why I bought it. Multiplayer is Ok and the maps are cool, the problem is you can't play for more than 30-40 min without the game crashing and freezing your ps3 forcing you to turn it off. THIS IS A HUGE problem with this game. EA or DICE should do something about it. Before you buy this game, google Battlefield 4 freezing ps3 or something similar, you will find it is all over the forums for the game. It's almost 6 months after the release of the game and it still hasn't been fixed. Consider that before you buy it. Expand
  65. Mar 6, 2014
    7
    For those who are looking for a battle simulator, this is your game, perhaps the main campaign is not the best one the multiplayer is where the game really shine, tons of guns, vehicles to ride and a nice action pack on 12 vs 12 games 2 more if you include Commander, add to this formula, Battlelog, the web / tablet / smartphone companion to see all your stats is just perfect.
    My main
    For those who are looking for a battle simulator, this is your game, perhaps the main campaign is not the best one the multiplayer is where the game really shine, tons of guns, vehicles to ride and a nice action pack on 12 vs 12 games 2 more if you include Commander, add to this formula, Battlelog, the web / tablet / smartphone companion to see all your stats is just perfect.
    My main complain is that have a lot of bugs, most of they are disconnections and freeze making my ps3 check the hard drive everytime i restart it, 7 points for me!
    Expand
  66. Feb 13, 2014
    5
    Although this could have been the best Battlefield game ever, this chance was wasted and the legacy of "the best game ever" (in my opinion) was squandered just to compete with the "other" game. This game was unfinished right from the start (even the beta was an alpha indeed) and was rushed to be released before COD. Yes, it introduces many new -and nice- features but turns into pureAlthough this could have been the best Battlefield game ever, this chance was wasted and the legacy of "the best game ever" (in my opinion) was squandered just to compete with the "other" game. This game was unfinished right from the start (even the beta was an alpha indeed) and was rushed to be released before COD. Yes, it introduces many new -and nice- features but turns into pure abomination in the end due to the constant freezing, disconnections and the countless bugs. On my ps3 system (don't begin to say the gameplay was intended for next-gen since there's something called "optimization" and if the PS3 system wasn't enough to deal with the game then it shouldn't be released for that console in the first place), it freezes on my "every" play and enough is enough. I regret that I even purchased Premium right from the start. The patches, on the other hand, didn't help at all. It's sad to see the Battlefield series at its current state. I hope BF5 will be tested properly and have more constant MP (as well as SP). My 5 out of 10 is dedicated to the fun I had with the game in spite of many frustrating moments. But I have to admit, this is the worst BF product ever. Expand
  67. Feb 4, 2014
    10
    All the people who keep saying Oh the netcode it Sucks well if u have bf4 start it up and do the update it wil be way better they fixed the game with a big patch there are still some issues with the game but very annoying things have been fixed for me atleast no killtrades or 1 shot kills with pistol they really did a good job so for all u hater plz give them a other chance its really good now
  68. Feb 1, 2014
    1
    Not impressed at all, clearly unfinished and untested at launch, constant crashes, locking up of PS3, unable to save campaign progress, jerky (sometimes) graphics, definitely the worst game experience I have had in at least 25 years!
    I had grown tired of COD and it's many faults, and wanted a better experience, I DID NOT find it with this game, and I certainly will not buy another EA/DICE
    Not impressed at all, clearly unfinished and untested at launch, constant crashes, locking up of PS3, unable to save campaign progress, jerky (sometimes) graphics, definitely the worst game experience I have had in at least 25 years!
    I had grown tired of COD and it's many faults, and wanted a better experience, I DID NOT find it with this game, and I certainly will not buy another EA/DICE game if this is the standard they are happy to release.
    Expand
  69. Jan 28, 2014
    7
    I think that not only to me but to a lot of fans out there Battlefield 4 is probably one of the, if not the most disappointing game of the year. The campaign is probably the worst aspect of this game, which is bad because i'm a big campaign and story guy. It does not deliver and provides an experience that is frustrating and in no way engaging. Now for the multiplayer. It's good, but notI think that not only to me but to a lot of fans out there Battlefield 4 is probably one of the, if not the most disappointing game of the year. The campaign is probably the worst aspect of this game, which is bad because i'm a big campaign and story guy. It does not deliver and provides an experience that is frustrating and in no way engaging. Now for the multiplayer. It's good, but not for long periods of time. The levelutions are cool, but not once you've seen them all in the trailers. As much as it pains me to say it, Call of Duty: Ghosts completely puts Battlefield 4 to shame! Expand
  70. Jan 26, 2014
    6
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I've played literally all of the Battlefield games, from 1942 to Battlefield 4. Now, I agree with everyone else that the gameplay has been dumbed down A LOT from the first game, but I have to say, this game is quite satisfying if you have time to live through all of the freezes and corrupt hard drive checks. It's also runs a lot better than the beta, as the graphics have been upped and most of the game-breaking glitches have been eliminated. People say that its literally Battlefield 3.5, that's kinda true in a way, seeing as the graphics can't be improved a whole lot from BF3. But the gameplay has been completely revamped, so don't expect this game to play the same as BF3. Conclusion: Buy this game if you can stand the crashes etc. If not, get a next-gen console, upgrade to a PC (even more crashed BTW) or stick with COD. Expand
  71. Jan 25, 2014
    6
    Found this game to be somewhat of a disappointment. I give credit to the computer engineers as I know how difficult programming is going thru engineering school myself. However I just found the game sloppy, monotonous and over hyped for what a fps should be..as soon as you get a sniper rifle you could easily pass each stage of the campaign without much strategy.. TypicAl point and shootFound this game to be somewhat of a disappointment. I give credit to the computer engineers as I know how difficult programming is going thru engineering school myself. However I just found the game sloppy, monotonous and over hyped for what a fps should be..as soon as you get a sniper rifle you could easily pass each stage of the campaign without much strategy.. TypicAl point and shoot camp wait to heal up and go again for the kill kind of game.. The story in the campaign itself was predicable and not interesting..oh and the game freezes and is quite laggy Expand
  72. Jan 21, 2014
    2
    Deception! DONT BUY BF4.
    YOU CANT PLAY ONE HOUR IN A ROW WITHOUT CREKING AND FREEZING YOUR PS3. THIS IS JUNK. NO COMPARISON WITH BF3 DONT WASTE YOUR MONEY. THEY JUST RELEASE AN UPDATE, NO FIX AT ALL. JUNK, GARBAGE, TRASH, BATTLEFIELD 4, ALL THE SAME!
  73. Jan 20, 2014
    7
    Theres 3 constants in this world; death, taxes, & BF4 crashing.

    But anyhow still a good game overall especially the new game modes. But some of the excellent aspects of bf3 have been changed or removed. Why do this? You have an awesome feature that works well & so you decide to alter it because 'we gotta change something so its not too similar'. The bugs are a bit annoying.. annoying
    Theres 3 constants in this world; death, taxes, & BF4 crashing.

    But anyhow still a good game overall especially the new game modes. But some of the excellent aspects of bf3 have been changed or removed. Why do this? You have an awesome feature that works well & so you decide to alter it because 'we gotta change something so its not too similar'.

    The bugs are a bit annoying.. annoying because they are so obvious. When obvious bugs are missed alarm bells ring with regard to a companies practice. What were they doing... Does the pressure of getting it out the door overide the playabilty factor?

    Who knows.. still a good solid game that is better and worse than bf3.
    Expand
  74. Jan 19, 2014
    0
    I made an account for the sole purpose of telling you NOT to buy this game. I don't know that these "10 rating" people are playing but its not BF4. Fair play like we all want and expect is nonexistant. Exploits are numerous. Expect to be killed before you ever see the enemy come around the corner due to lag from the game that is 1/2 to 3/4 a second at times. Unloading into an enemy atI made an account for the sole purpose of telling you NOT to buy this game. I don't know that these "10 rating" people are playing but its not BF4. Fair play like we all want and expect is nonexistant. Exploits are numerous. Expect to be killed before you ever see the enemy come around the corner due to lag from the game that is 1/2 to 3/4 a second at times. Unloading into an enemy at point blank range with an LMG is useless. One hit kills are 95% of the time what happens. Bugs and glitches everywhere. Dice/EA is just sitting back laughing at customers BUT not their shareholders as they now have 4 lawsuits on them becauseBF4 was a "pump and dump" title. Look it up on the net. Forbes has a nice article on it. Ever see a 25mm gun that couldnt kill worth a crap? Its in BF4. Ever been killed while running on the other side of a map by one shot? Its in BF4. Im telling you as others have told you!!!! This game is BROKEN!!!! If you must find out for yourself then borrow it or rent it at REDBOX. Expand
  75. Jan 19, 2014
    2
    Broken. Would like a refund. I'll look at this game again in 2015 when it's working. I won't be purchasing in-game with EA because they sold a broken product. Did EA push Dice to release an unfinished product for xmas 2013? It looks like it. Stick with BF3 for now.

    BF4 maps are sparse -I think the franchise is stale. BF3 maps are great -this makes for a much more enjoyable game.
  76. Jan 12, 2014
    5
    Fun game when it works. The trouble is that it glitches more than it works. The MP is fun and isn't super glitchy most of the time but the SP will delete your progress, unlocks and sometimes will load in with sound but no image. Mediocre.
  77. Jan 4, 2014
    8
    The game has fantastic multiplayer, but the bugs can be unbearable. Campaign just embarrasses it's self because it is point based, and you never really connect to it when it's like that. All this is shrouded over the splendid multiplayer. Being able to make buildings crumble, make a ship crash into a building, explode IED's, create craters, Destroy Levees to flood a map, just puts power inThe game has fantastic multiplayer, but the bugs can be unbearable. Campaign just embarrasses it's self because it is point based, and you never really connect to it when it's like that. All this is shrouded over the splendid multiplayer. Being able to make buildings crumble, make a ship crash into a building, explode IED's, create craters, Destroy Levees to flood a map, just puts power in to a player's hands, and makes them feel important. Expand
  78. Jan 1, 2014
    5
    Review from a long time battlefield fan (since 1942).

    In one sentence... Do not buy this game yet. This is the most disappointing game I've bought this year. I mean, I've had some fun with it, and am still playing it, but the problems are so severe its not even funny. This game is, in almost every way, inferior to BF 3. In a nutshell, the campaign is an improvement from the
    Review from a long time battlefield fan (since 1942).

    In one sentence... Do not buy this game yet.

    This is the most disappointing game I've bought this year. I mean, I've had some fun with it, and am still playing it, but the problems are so severe its not even funny. This game is, in almost every way, inferior to BF 3.

    In a nutshell, the campaign is an improvement from the console BF3. Its well paced, much more open ended, and much more fun than its predecessor campaign. The graphics on the campaign are also quite good for current gen consoles (ps3/360).

    Apart from that minor advantage over BF3, the game is ultimately inferior. The first thing you will notice in the multiplayer are the severe pop in issues. These were prevalent in BF3, but they are much worse here. The textures are also VERY slow to load. There are many in door levels in the game where its clear that the developers did not even bother to add textures.

    Before getting to more negatives, on the positive side... the multiplayer features plenty of guns. The sound design is great. Some of the new game modes are great as well. Obliteration, for instance, when its working right, is a perfect fit for consoles. It merges the large scale destruction of conquest with an objective that keeps the action focused and frantic. Its really a very fun mode.

    More importantly, this game suffers from some of the worst bugs I have ever seen in a major title. I bought this game after christmas. Despite the game being out for almost two months, I have experienced a variety of major issues. First of all, YOU WILL LOOSE YOUR CAMPAIGN PROGRESS once you switch to multiplayer. This issue has been brought to the teams attention OVER a month ago but has still not been fixed. LUCKILY, if you play the campaign ALL THE WAY THROUGH, without switching to multiplayer, you can AT LEAST keep your weapon unlocks and trophies. A heads up, there are FOUR guns to be unlocked in the campaign. One in the first level, 3 in the last. I will not give any spoilers.

    I think that the above mentioned problem by itself is pretty awful but there are more. On the multiplayer side, the game freezes every so often and you will have to reboot your PS3. This has happened to me, on average, once per roughly every 3 hour session In addition, THERE IS ABOLUTELY NO PARTY SUPPORT. This means that you cannot create a party with your friends and join a game together. Instead, you must join a friends game or get invited to it. This doesn't seem like a bug, it seems it was intentionally omitted from the game. This speaks to the level of quality of this product.

    Another issue is the spawns. Initially, the spawns on modes like squad deathmatch were very bad... usually placing someone right in front of the enemy. This seems to have been fixed. However, there is still a possibility that you will spawn UNDER THE MAP.

    The controls have also been changed. These can be set back by switching to all VETERAN settings in the options menu. I am not docking the game for these choices, but I did find it personally annoying.

    Ultimately, BF4 is a game that fans may enjoy. It does provide the same basic CONSOLE BF experience. However, something important was lost with this release. This game is by no means a quality product. It is riddled with game breaking bugs that go far and beyond what to expect with a major release. Some will discount any of the campaign bugs as insignificant because "no one plays the campaign", but that is simply wrong. I know people who ONLY play FPS for their campaigns. On top of that, if the most basic functions of your single player (such as keeping your progress) don't work...what else is wrong with it. The truth is, there is alot wrong with this game. I bought this game for 25$ on sale. I sometimes have the urge to buy the DLC, but i'm not going to do it. This product is unacceptable. These problems need to be fixed and if they are not, this company needs to feel the consequences. I understand that many of us love DICE, but that doesn't change the fact that this game is simply incomplete. I am truly disappointed with this game.
    Expand
  79. Jan 1, 2014
    0
    As a new comer to battlefield I am shocked. To release a game with so many issues that affect the core of the gaming experience is entirely disrespectful to the gaming community. I've been playing it for a few weeks now, two months after the initial launch, and I've had my campaign progress wiped 4 times, and had every multiplayer weapon relocked and become unattainable. Yes I can plug theAs a new comer to battlefield I am shocked. To release a game with so many issues that affect the core of the gaming experience is entirely disrespectful to the gaming community. I've been playing it for a few weeks now, two months after the initial launch, and I've had my campaign progress wiped 4 times, and had every multiplayer weapon relocked and become unattainable. Yes I can plug the game in and play it as if it were the first time but I cannot make ANY progress.

    There are aspects of the game I appreciate but nothing can make up for the utter failure of the game to function and allow a player to actually play THROUGH the game rather than simply be reset every single day. Any company with such a lack of respect for their audience does not deserve the respect of those who play their product.
    Expand
  80. Dec 27, 2013
    3
    Complete let down. Single player movements and gun play feel completely unrealistic with no store line present. Multiplayer is just a disaster. For everyone saying its similar to BF3, it's not. Everything feels completely different, from movements, to gunplay. And it's a lot worse. A lot of the time I feel as if I'm playing a call of duty game. The netcode is terrible, weapons areComplete let down. Single player movements and gun play feel completely unrealistic with no store line present. Multiplayer is just a disaster. For everyone saying its similar to BF3, it's not. Everything feels completely different, from movements, to gunplay. And it's a lot worse. A lot of the time I feel as if I'm playing a call of duty game. The netcode is terrible, weapons are unbalanced, it constantly freezes your console and there are many glitches/bugs from audio to graphic to even a few game breaking bugs.

    The orange filter on the killcam is cartoonish and a put off, the graphics on a PS3 are significantly worse than BF3 at times (when they even decide to render) and the map design is bland and at times boring. Not to mention every gui is ugly and glitchy in the game.The menu is ugly, slow and freezes, the server browser becomes not responsive, the spawn menu is slow and confusing for a few hours of gameplay.

    I don't usually express my opinion on games and play them as is, but this is just too horrible for me to play. If you want to have fun. play anything prior to BF4 (Including 3) but don't waste your money on this garbage, at least yet. But I don't have hope of it getting better because they've ruined the feel of Battlefield and seem to be trying to compete with Call of Duty by copying that play style and adding vehicles.
    Expand
  81. Dec 26, 2013
    2
    I'm a huge fan of Dice and the Battlefield games. I've been playing them since Bad Company 2/1943. I've talked many people into switching from C.O.D. to Battlefield. However, Battlefield 4 was a HUGE disappointment. I don't know how they could ruin such a good thing.
    The graphics are terrible. They would only be appealing to Helen Keller. When I play the game, it looks like I'm displaying
    I'm a huge fan of Dice and the Battlefield games. I've been playing them since Bad Company 2/1943. I've talked many people into switching from C.O.D. to Battlefield. However, Battlefield 4 was a HUGE disappointment. I don't know how they could ruin such a good thing.
    The graphics are terrible. They would only be appealing to Helen Keller. When I play the game, it looks like I'm displaying rejected forms of abstract art on my tv.
    The graphics aren't the worst part about this game, it's the controls! Everything and anything you want to do in this game is confusing. Who's decision was it to change the vehicle controls from great to garbage? There was never a problem with the controls in any of the previous games, why did you change them?
    I can only guess Dice messed this game up so badly, because they needed a bunch of tax write-offs. This game is good for one thing, and one thing only, re-gifting. But re-gifting this game is just like re-gifting used toilet paper.
    Expand
  82. Dec 26, 2013
    2
    Every time I insert the game into my PS3 it's like playing Russian roulette: will the game work or will it freeze? And most of the time it f*cks up my PS3. In terms of multiplayer the guns have literally declined in performance compared to BF3, and the unlocks are horrible compared to previous Battlefield games. I mean come on DICE, can't you make a game is worth playing for generations?Every time I insert the game into my PS3 it's like playing Russian roulette: will the game work or will it freeze? And most of the time it f*cks up my PS3. In terms of multiplayer the guns have literally declined in performance compared to BF3, and the unlocks are horrible compared to previous Battlefield games. I mean come on DICE, can't you make a game is worth playing for generations? The game does feel more rushed than previous BF games and that's due to the COD feel that this game possesses, especially with the new unlockable camos/achievements that they added. Literally all the players/teammates in all the squads have started to worry about K/D and W/L rather than winning the actual match. Pathetic. Not to mention the unbalanced size of the maps when you try to play Rush and capture all the spots which enables the enemy teams to have the time to re-capture them. The whole game is off

    I honestly feel like this was better off for Next-Gen consoles because all of the graphics are a step-down from BF3. I take that back, from BFBC1. Everything feels off, and connectivity is a huge issue especially with TDM. When you try and search for a TDM match in Quick Play, it freezes the console FORCING you to restart the whole system. The game is ridiculously buggy and is too minuscule to fit the 4th Title of the Battlefield Franchise.

    I would've rather had coal than this for christmas.
    Expand
  83. Dec 25, 2013
    8
    I know this game have very short singe player and you can't play with your friend in same ps3 but there is perfect multiplayer !!And its britty same with bf3 but some changis is like new maps,new vechiles,guns...Its pritty cool but not best
  84. Dec 22, 2013
    4
    Sera muy buen juego cuando arreglen todos los fallos que tiene entonces cambiare mi pensamiento sobre el, ya que la consola se quede bloqueada cada dos por tres jugando no mola nada no por los puntos si no por reiniciar de mala forma la consola.
  85. Dec 14, 2013
    1
    Server shutdown, loss of campaing data, premium battlepacks not working, freeze gameplays, overlapping of screens... it's almost impossible to play a couple days without a single problem...
  86. Dec 12, 2013
    4
    NO! this game is CRAP! the multiplayer is down right awful. bf3 is was better. first of all, it takes TOOOOO DANG LONG to get it kill. WAYYYYYY to much hit markers. i shoot a guy with all the bullets in my mag, he wasnt dead, needed to reload, not to menshine my friendlies for also shooting him at the same time. so i shot him some more i and got the asist! second, the vehicals have to muchNO! this game is CRAP! the multiplayer is down right awful. bf3 is was better. first of all, it takes TOOOOO DANG LONG to get it kill. WAYYYYYY to much hit markers. i shoot a guy with all the bullets in my mag, he wasnt dead, needed to reload, not to menshine my friendlies for also shooting him at the same time. so i shot him some more i and got the asist! second, the vehicals have to much health too. i shot a tank with all the explotions in my launcher and it didnt get destroyed! third, the graphics are donkey crap! fourth its takes too long to level up. fifth, the recoil on the guns it too much. and last, the range on the guns needs to be increased. Ghosts>Bf4 Expand
  87. Dec 10, 2013
    3
    This review is for multiplayer only.

    I am a big fan of battlefield bad company series of games and have logged well over 200 hours of multiplayer in BF3 and BFBC2 but I CANNOT recommend this game to anyone in its CURRENT state. BF3 was a great game, BF4 so far is just an average game. You would think since DICE had 2 years to IMPROVE upon BF3, BF4 would be amazing but amazing it is
    This review is for multiplayer only.

    I am a big fan of battlefield bad company series of games and have logged well over 200 hours of multiplayer in BF3 and BFBC2 but I CANNOT recommend this game to anyone in its CURRENT state.

    BF3 was a great game, BF4 so far is just an average game. You would think since DICE had 2 years to IMPROVE upon BF3, BF4 would be amazing but amazing it is not. So far everything seems like a downgrade, not an upgrade. If you enjoyed playing with your friends on the same squad, on the same team DO NOT buy this game (or wait until they patch it). Currently you are unable to create a squad pre-game, no pre-game squad lobby. You are unable to switch sides if you or your friends end up on opposing teams.
    In order for you to try and get your friends on the same team in the same game, you have to go to a server that is basically empty and wait for players to join in. Then your friends can exit and re-join the same game a HOPE that they are on your team.

    In terms of graphics and weapons and maps they are all on par with BF3 with slight tweaks and slight improvements but nothing "earth shattering". The newest feature: "levolution" or massive destruction where you can collapse skyscrapers and implode bridges and dams is very cool, but does NOT make up for the short comings of this game.
    Expand
  88. Dec 5, 2013
    8
    Battlefield 4 represents the best fps games can offer nearing the end of 2013. The game has kept almost all the good things from its predecessors and added several new ones. The best thing about BF4 for me personally is the restored balance between capabilities of vehicles and foot soldiers which was sorely missing from Battlefield 3. Thankfully an adequately equipped soldier is a goodBattlefield 4 represents the best fps games can offer nearing the end of 2013. The game has kept almost all the good things from its predecessors and added several new ones. The best thing about BF4 for me personally is the restored balance between capabilities of vehicles and foot soldiers which was sorely missing from Battlefield 3. Thankfully an adequately equipped soldier is a good match for any in game vehicle. Helicopters and tanks are very capable and dangerous but with some care they can be blown up even by a barely leveled up infantryman which is how it should be in a game. Contrary to some reviewers I find even zero level equipment both for soldiers and vehicles deadly enough which is also a good step away from BF3.

    Then there is the levolution of course. Not all maps are created equal, but on most maps the effect of triggering the levolution event is both visually spectacular and can significantly alter the flow of the battle. Apart from levolution buildings and terrain in BF4 maps is definitely more destructible than in BF3. Some maps can be leveled completely, some only partially but any cover can be damaged or even removed completely by gunfire and explosives.

    The only real problem I have with Battlefield 4 is that Dice and Electronic Arts have released a work in progress. Even a month after the release on PS3 there still are interface bugs, network hiccups and not so rare slowdowns and complete freezes during multiplayer matches. The game could a perfect fps experience and it will be, but judging from the current progress we will have to wait till March 2014 for that.
    Expand
  89. Dec 5, 2013
    1
    I bought BF4 deluxe edition because I really like the Battlefield series. I had great time with BFBC2 and BF3. But, this game is so broken. My ps3 freezes all the time. Why can't they test the game before releasing? It's really sad.

    Instead of spending money on advertising, they should had put money in getting better testers. The campaign is as boring as BF3. But, everyone buys BF4
    I bought BF4 deluxe edition because I really like the Battlefield series. I had great time with BFBC2 and BF3. But, this game is so broken. My ps3 freezes all the time. Why can't they test the game before releasing? It's really sad.

    Instead of spending money on advertising, they should had put money in getting better testers.

    The campaign is as boring as BF3. But, everyone buys BF4 for multiplayer right! Well, multiplayer is broken too. You can't even create a squad. This franchise is going downhill with each iteration. All they care about is money. EA's touch ruins another franchise!
    Expand
  90. Dec 4, 2013
    8
    Bugs and glitches in the game are terrible! Instead, corrections, additions do! DICE, serezdnyh forward amendments in the game. When the game is to play well, you can already put the estimates above.
  91. Dec 4, 2013
    1
    sorry to say but battlefield 4 has gone to my reasons, the jets in the game are invincible its like your shooting a potato gun at them and the air superiority matches are way to short. If i could have a wish i would wish that i never bought such a trash game!!!! thanks for the waste of money
  92. Dec 4, 2013
    8
    Battlefield 4 is the newest game in the Battlefield franchise and this game is pretty decent. If you are a veteran player, this game to me feels like what Battlefield 3 should have been. The multiplayer maps are once again huge and all have very interesting "levolutions" which change the map. These changes can be collapsing a skyscraper, flooding a city or blowing a hole in a dam. HoweverBattlefield 4 is the newest game in the Battlefield franchise and this game is pretty decent. If you are a veteran player, this game to me feels like what Battlefield 3 should have been. The multiplayer maps are once again huge and all have very interesting "levolutions" which change the map. These changes can be collapsing a skyscraper, flooding a city or blowing a hole in a dam. However similar to Battlefield 3, there is not enough destructible environments, which for me is a huge selling point for the Battlefield games. The multiplayer and the game does have quite a few glitches, and I have froze on multiple occasions, luckily Dice and EA have been introducing patches to fix these problems. The campaign is relatively short, however the characters and story is much more interesting then BF3's as well.

    In short, the game is very fun and you will sink many hours into the multiplayer. The game is a little glitchy but by the time Christmas rolls around, most should be fixed. The single player campaign is fun and actually has a decent story and interesting characters. However the main selling point of the game is of course the online multiplayer, which is one of the best online FPS shooters to date.
    Expand
  93. Dec 4, 2013
    2
    What a Disapointment.
    This game is a blurry shadow of what BF3 is.
    On PS3 the game graphics are garbage (plain and simple). Frostbite 3 is just a pipe dream. During parts of the campaign missions the rendering simply crashes and there is no way to know where to go or how to continue. Campaign is also really short and lacks of interaction with the story poor script. The "Genius" that
    What a Disapointment.
    This game is a blurry shadow of what BF3 is.
    On PS3 the game graphics are garbage (plain and simple). Frostbite 3 is just a pipe dream. During parts of the campaign missions the rendering simply crashes and there is no way to know where to go or how to continue.
    Campaign is also really short and lacks of interaction with the story poor script.
    The "Genius" that decided to change all the buttons configuration should be fired! At least give an option to the players to customize the controls they way they like it that's common sense!
    The only good thing is the addition of a few new vehicles and that's it.
    My suggestion is to not even bother buying this game stay playing BF3.
    Expand
  94. Dec 3, 2013
    5
    Review of multiplayer only Battlefield 3 showed me what Call of Duty was missing. I never thought I would go back to CoD, but if they cannot do better than this with their follow up effort I just might have to. I wish there was a Battlefield clone that I could recommend for those of you are addicted to the large scale warfare set in a realistic world that requires teamwork and includesReview of multiplayer only Battlefield 3 showed me what Call of Duty was missing. I never thought I would go back to CoD, but if they cannot do better than this with their follow up effort I just might have to. I wish there was a Battlefield clone that I could recommend for those of you are addicted to the large scale warfare set in a realistic world that requires teamwork and includes vehicles, but unfortunately this is probably the best you are going to get. If you haven't played BF3 yet, I would highly recommend that instead... if they still run BF3 servers that is.

    There are just so many "headscratching" moments during any given session that it really make me wonder if this could possibly have been the finished product they intended. I realize this was probably designed for the next-gen systems and the PS3 was an afterthought, but here are some of my issues:
    1) Bullet detection I cannot count the number of times I have just WAILED on an unsuspecting opponent from close range with my primary weapon run out of ammo switch to my sidearm and hit him some more just to have him turn around and shoot me once with a pistol and I go down immediately. Then, as if to demonstrate just how poorly their software is working, the "I just got killed" screen shows me that my target still has 50% of his life left... wha? and while I must admit I sometimes get to be the unsuspecting target with the pistol that was magically victorious, it does not make me feel any better about it.
    2) The gunner on just about every vehicle is so much weaker than in BF3. Picking off guys in the helicopter or from the gunner seat in a tank used to be fun. Now you plug a guy several times and they still won't go down. The vehicles are pretty much only good for rides across the giant maps. The jets used to be my favorite... they are pretty much worthless now and I pass on them every time.
    3) Graphical anomalies during round startup!? Why would you want the round to start before all the textures were loaded? The first 30 seconds of every round looks like you're playing on a PS One. And the sound during this time period is atrocious.
    4) Sound This is the first game that I have noticed the sound... which means it is BAD... REAL BAD. Long stretches (30 minutes) of sounding like I'm under water. Random loss of sound. And I'm guessing many of the times that I'm been killed by one magic bullet is actually probably the 6th or 7th fired, the sound of the first 5 isn't heard on my machine.
    5) I've been playing the game for a month and very few games have locked up requiring a restart as often as this one has.

    Am I going to stop playing? No. If fact, I'll probably get it for the PS4 when I finally get one. But I'm just coming to realize that I am more fond of the concept/potential of this game versus the game itself. If this had been the first BF I played back in my CoD days, there's no way I would be a BF fan.
    Expand
  95. Dec 3, 2013
    0
    Originally, I over-looked the low scores of this game and assumed they had to have been posted by COD fans and people who are not fans of the series, as there is a war out there amongst such titles. As a fan of the Battlefield series, I urge you to take these low scores seriously. This game should have never been shipped and sold at the price it is in its current broken condition. The gameOriginally, I over-looked the low scores of this game and assumed they had to have been posted by COD fans and people who are not fans of the series, as there is a war out there amongst such titles. As a fan of the Battlefield series, I urge you to take these low scores seriously. This game should have never been shipped and sold at the price it is in its current broken condition. The game MIGHT be good, somewhere, but we cannot be sure as IT DOES NOT WORK. Single-player does not save, multiplayer has boat loads of stability issues and the changes they made to the series do it nothing but harm. Hyped up, rushed out GARBAGE. Expand
  96. Nov 30, 2013
    10
    this game is awesome i love the levolution. este guego es asombroso adoro el levolution lo unico que esta un poco flojo es la campañaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaa aaaaaaa aaaaa aaa aaa a aaa aaa a aaaa a
  97. Nov 30, 2013
    7
    Battlefield 4 is a much better game than BF3. The graphics are great and the character models look amazingly realistic. The multiplayer is also better than BF3, with the addition of levolution. I think the best part about this game is the single player campaign, their are some sad and touching moments during he story. BF4 has a great and memorable cast of characters like Recker, Irish,Battlefield 4 is a much better game than BF3. The graphics are great and the character models look amazingly realistic. The multiplayer is also better than BF3, with the addition of levolution. I think the best part about this game is the single player campaign, their are some sad and touching moments during he story. BF4 has a great and memorable cast of characters like Recker, Irish, Hannah, and Pac. Theirs a lot of things to do after you finish the campaign, you could complete it at a higher difficulty, you can collect all the guns/collectibles and complete all the assignments. This is a solid shooter, with an underrated campaign, and also this games graphics/story/gameplay are way better than COD: Ghosts. Overall Score= 78/100 Expand
  98. Nov 24, 2013
    7
    This latest entry in the Battlefield series manages to provide a decent FPS experience, but overall lacks the necessary polish and wow factor to make it stand out in the ever growing crowd of first-person shooters competing for the multiplayer crown. It proves that name alone doesn't make up for a rush job of a game. Still despite its issues it still provides a decent enough of anThis latest entry in the Battlefield series manages to provide a decent FPS experience, but overall lacks the necessary polish and wow factor to make it stand out in the ever growing crowd of first-person shooters competing for the multiplayer crown. It proves that name alone doesn't make up for a rush job of a game. Still despite its issues it still provides a decent enough of an experience to be worth a spot in your multiplayer selections, just don't expect greatness.

    The campaign is enjoyable enough to be worth a playthrough. It's short and the characters and story are forgettable, but the firefight you'll find here are fun enough to keep you entertained until the credits roll. The only thing that really stands out about it is the fact that you can rank up a high-score based on how well you perform. For the most part though it is about what you would expect for a modern FPS campaign. Lots of explosions and set pieces all crammed into a 4 to 5 hour experience. It's not perfect but it is far from the worst campaign I've played in a FPS. But let's be honest no one is going to buy this game for its campaign, multiplayer is the strength of this series.

    As far as multiplayer goes it to is simply an adequate experience. It's also where the game feels the most rushed. The graphics, which manage to stay pretty nice throughout the campaign, are atrocious during multiplayer matches. Textures are washed out and everything just looks dated and ugly. Gameplay manages to hold up for the most part with a nice selection of maps and game modes. Minor glitches and some balancing issues hold the experience back, but what really hurts the experience is the sense of deja vu. It feels remarkably like Battlefield 3 did, only with dated presentation. But even with issues Battlefield 4's multiplayer provides enough thrills to be worth playing.

    Overall it seems like DICE rushed out this latest Battlefield simply to compete with the latest Call of Duty. It lacks the polish of previous entries in the series and ends up feeling like more of the same. In the end it is hard to complain about more of the Battlefield series sweet multiplayer, even if it does feel very rushed. It may not wow you in the same way Battlefield 3 did, but its multiplayer will keep you entertained. I can only hope that with the next Battlefield that DICE manages to make sure everything is up to snuff before releasing it. I understand that they want to compete with COD, but they will only manage to hurt themselves if they don't add that last layer of polish.
    Expand
  99. Nov 21, 2013
    6
    This game has its good points, but, there were a lot of issues and bugs with the game in its current state, sometimes it freezes, sometimes the graphics don't load, and the story mode was very annoying at some points, like when it deletes your progress. The storyline is also more of a gauntlet when it comes to big fights and the enemies will come in droves, which, even on its lowestThis game has its good points, but, there were a lot of issues and bugs with the game in its current state, sometimes it freezes, sometimes the graphics don't load, and the story mode was very annoying at some points, like when it deletes your progress. The storyline is also more of a gauntlet when it comes to big fights and the enemies will come in droves, which, even on its lowest difficulty setting its painstakingly hard to survive thirty-five dudes shooting at you at once and it just gets a little bit overwhelming. Personally, I preferred Battlefield 3. Expand
  100. Nov 20, 2013
    5
    Guess Dice, or Metacritic didn't like my review of Battlefield 4...I couldn't do do a third edit to reflect my thoughts on next-gen consoles with Battlefield 4. Battlefield 4 has been out on PS4 for five days now and I can say that the netcode is terrible and conquest and rush are only available occasionally. Firmware 1,51 didn't fix anything in regards to Battlefield. If you bought a Ps4Guess Dice, or Metacritic didn't like my review of Battlefield 4...I couldn't do do a third edit to reflect my thoughts on next-gen consoles with Battlefield 4. Battlefield 4 has been out on PS4 for five days now and I can say that the netcode is terrible and conquest and rush are only available occasionally. Firmware 1,51 didn't fix anything in regards to Battlefield. If you bought a Ps4 to play Battlefield 4 like I did, I can tell you with confidence to save your money. It looks great, but all that is available is defuse and domination online and the netcode really sucks!!!!!! I know that it is a new launch of a console and game, but currently Bf4 on Ps4 is severely lacking. It is the pretty girlfriend isn't wasn't worth talking to. Sony and Dice why would you want to start next-gen with a black-eye? It sucks!!!!!!!!!!!! Expand
Metascore
80

Generally favorable reviews - based on 14 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 11 out of 14
  2. Negative: 0 out of 14
  1. Nov 12, 2013
    70
    To blow COD out of the water, they will need a more polished game than this. Perhaps the next-generation will provide it.
  2. Nov 11, 2013
    80
    So there you have it, the current-gen version of Battlefield 4. To be honest, it’s not a huge leap forward over Battlefield 3. It looks slightly better but performs slightly worse.
  3. Nov 8, 2013
    80
    The really unfortunate thing with this Premium nonsense is that the greater body of players are made to feel like they're travelling in economy class, so that the core fans can be milked. I'm not anti-DLC, but the way Battlefield Premium constantly thrusts at you just feels grubby. It's not a nice way to treat paying customers, and it's a pity to see it besmirch such a great game.