Total War: Rome II - Emperor Edition

 PC
  • Publisher: Sega
  • Release Date: Sep 16, 2014
User Score
7.3

Mixed or average reviews- based on 179 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 120 out of 179
  2. Mixed: 24 out of 179
  3. Negative: 35 out of 179

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. TheMasiMan1
    Nov 19, 2015
    8
    I consider the disasturous lauch of Total War: Rome 2 to be just in the original game and not be taken into account for the Emperor Edition. So, what does the Emperor Edition add to Total War: Rome 2? Well, it adds a new campaign adn... not much else. Thea campaign is nice, dont get me wrong, but with the title of "Edition" I would think they would have edited of added alot of stuff into the game.
  2. Vorlon66
    Jul 21, 2015
    5
    Caveat Emptor! I gave the initial version of Total War Rome II a resounding 0/10 for being a seriously incomplete and flawed game that should never have been released in the state it was in. The Emperor Edition does finally bring the game up to what it should have been at that initial release - at least from a technical and performance perspective. The initial version was frankly aCaveat Emptor! I gave the initial version of Total War Rome II a resounding 0/10 for being a seriously incomplete and flawed game that should never have been released in the state it was in. The Emperor Edition does finally bring the game up to what it should have been at that initial release - at least from a technical and performance perspective. The initial version was frankly a disgrace - it taught me to never pre-order a game again, not to rely on a franchise "reputation", and to distrust many of the "professional" game reviewers and game review websites.

    At best I would now rate it a 5/10 - it has too many design and aesthetic flaws from the clumsy agent and political faction system to a messy provincial system to some odd choices in functionality (inconsistent use of opening and closing windows - missing information in pop up panels and the Encyclopedia and the lack of proper linking through to game elements between event windows) to the poor choices over unit and building card designs - so while it is a not a "bad" (or appallingly disastrous!) game anymore and can be quite enjoyable it is by no means comparable to Shogun 2, Napoleon, MTW2, the original RTW or even Shogun 1. Even the patched up Total War Empire is IMO actually a better game than this one. Even at the hardest difficulty it is still far too easy at the strategic and tactical level (battles are still far too easy, too short and arcade like and naval battles are still pretty hopeless - you'll end up auto-resolving most of them). If I really want a challenging game with depth and complexity then I still prefer the Europa Barbarorum II conversion/mod of Medieval Total War 2.

    I certainly wouldn't recommend this game + DLC at full price. Most of the DLC is really content that should have been in the base game rather than actual enhancement and expansion (the Blood and Gore DLC being the most egregious example of this) - Creative Assembly/Sega really need to re-examine their DLC programme - compare it to Paradox's approach to EUIV and Crusader Kings II to see how a proper DLC can be handled). Wait until TW Rome II: TEE goes on sale for a significant discount and then consider buying it (first though buy the earlier TW games or even Total War: Atilla).    … Expand
  3. Dezdicho
    Mar 7, 2015
    6
    Rome 2 is almost a good game. Its disappointments are intriguing, almost more so than the things it does right. In each of my three completed playthroughs I saw a glimmer of what the developers intended, a chance to spread my empire throughout the massive ancient world so beautifully rendered in this game. Instead, the player is treated to unfulfilling imperial bloating to reach theRome 2 is almost a good game. Its disappointments are intriguing, almost more so than the things it does right. In each of my three completed playthroughs I saw a glimmer of what the developers intended, a chance to spread my empire throughout the massive ancient world so beautifully rendered in this game. Instead, the player is treated to unfulfilling imperial bloating to reach the arbitrary victory condition, compounded by an AI unable to cope with the complexity of the game’s mechanics.
    Despite all the patches the Emperor Edition provided, Rome 2 suffers foremost from poor pacing. There are a myriad of reasons, most of them concerning the sprawling size of the campaign map and related mechanics to manage it all. I will leave it to others to analyze what went wrong in that respect, and instead will give the underwhelming template each of my games followed to illustrate why all this amounted to a less than great Total War experience.

    The early-game is where I’ve had the most fun with Rome 2. It presents a genuine struggle to survive with limited resources and military capabilities. Each battle determines the fate of your faction as the player attempts to secure the often precarious starting position. Threats emerge from all sides, and only through calculated diplomacy, strategic army placement, and battlefield success will the player emerge stronger. The mid-game that follows is an expansion and consolidation phase. Your faction’s annihilation is no longer in question, with securing borders and establishing alliances becoming your main assignment. Factors like food, politics, happiness, and wealth technically limit your growth, but feel tedious to manage and done almost as an afterthought.

    The mid-game really serves as a stepping stone to the late-game, where once you have secured a strong position, you challenge your largest rivals in a bid to gain land. What should be an exciting climax is instead a dull affair even at hard difficulties, as the steamroll begins. The AI doesn’t seem to form large empires, use agents effectively, or place armies in strategic defensive positions. Auto-Resolve became the norm with few battles needing to actually be played. And it lasts a long time, at least if you play for the victory conditions. The game may be yours with 60 settlements, but you will have another 40 to grind through, while managing a huge empire where the right decision is often obvious and unrewarding. Thinking of pacing overall, the early-game ends rather quickly, going into the consolidating mid-game which builds an excitement to conquer the world. All the preparation of the mid-game takes some time but is done so in anticipation of what surely will be a great clash for ultimate domination. That promise though remains undelivered, as the late-game offers little-to-no climax, instead proffering more consolidation on a grander scale.

    Maybe it was the faction I was playing (Arverni, Octavian, Julia), maybe I should have played Very Hard or Legendary, or maybe I should even just stuck with overhaul mods. But something with Rome 2 just feels incomplete, like CA was almost onto something great but didn’t quite deliver. I have had fun with this game, but would not put it on my list of the greatest Total War games. Ultimately it is more interesting as where a Total War game can go wrong, and I can only hope that CA is paying attention for their next installments    … Expand
  4. Exfan
    Feb 24, 2015
    5
    It took about 9 months of beta testing by Rome 2 players. Many patches to get game at playable state. If you would forget how long this took and game to be finished i would give 8-9 rating. However least CA did something to already published game. Game is quite bug free atm some little issues with unit pricing that should be corrected by minor patch. DCL packs are mostly decent if youIt took about 9 months of beta testing by Rome 2 players. Many patches to get game at playable state. If you would forget how long this took and game to be finished i would give 8-9 rating. However least CA did something to already published game. Game is quite bug free atm some little issues with unit pricing that should be corrected by minor patch. DCL packs are mostly decent if you forget Wrath of Sparta which is terrible. DCL packs aren't really needed and should be bought on discount sales if yo need those.
    Some forgive failure of Rome 2 when name is changed and buyers of Rome 2 get this freebie i do not.
    At current state not bad game at all.    … Expand
  5. RoyCohn
    Feb 12, 2015
    10
    Great game - played most of the other Total War games and I have to say: this one has the most potential. Modding makes a huge difference and the fact that they took the time to fix bugs in the Emperor Edition is also great. It's a challenging game that will keep you hooked for months to come. I'm still trying to figure stuff out, play around with all the mechanics, and I've been playingGreat game - played most of the other Total War games and I have to say: this one has the most potential. Modding makes a huge difference and the fact that they took the time to fix bugs in the Emperor Edition is also great. It's a challenging game that will keep you hooked for months to come. I'm still trying to figure stuff out, play around with all the mechanics, and I've been playing it for almost a month now.… Expand
  6. PersonCritic
    Jan 25, 2015
    8
    In my initial review of this game I gave the game a 6. I have changed that to an 8, 8.6 if I could. After seeing my cummulative time spent on this game, without regret, I must say it is very entertaining. One of the biggest upsides that made me change my grade is the very easy way of seeking and installing mods with Steam Workshop. I spent a total of 15 minutes installing a few mods whichIn my initial review of this game I gave the game a 6. I have changed that to an 8, 8.6 if I could. After seeing my cummulative time spent on this game, without regret, I must say it is very entertaining. One of the biggest upsides that made me change my grade is the very easy way of seeking and installing mods with Steam Workshop. I spent a total of 15 minutes installing a few mods which didn't fundamentally change the game (though there are mods which change a lot if you'd want to) but smoothed out some rough edges and it made a big difference. It really is just a matter of browsing mods and clicking 'subscribe' on the mod you want: that's it.
    A problem that however I have not found a mod for yet (not saying it isn't there but I'd imagine it would be the most popular one if there was one, therefore easy to encounter when you search for it) is the AI. It is predictable and the weakest link in Total War in the 12 years I've been playing the games. It is the AI that doesn't get this game to a 9+, what I'd call an AAA+ or instant classic.

    The final improvement of this Emperor edition and subsequent patches is the bugfixing: though the routes units sometimes take when you sent them somewhere, especially on object heavy maps, or the way artillery behaves (a stationary mode would be nice) is sometimes truly annoying though predictable, there aren't any game breaking bugs. And it runs rather well on my medium range PC now, with most settings on high and a few even better.

    Summarized, love the Emperor Edition!    … Expand
  7. grandgnu
    Jan 6, 2015
    9
    I sharpened my teeth on the original Medieval TW, then Rome, then Medieval II. But I was always disappointed that the games AI was lacking. Fortunately the modding scene gave me a ton of extra enjoyment out of Medieval II.

    Still, after the debacle of Empire I vowed to never again support this series. I skipped Napoleon, Shogun II, etc. and then Rome II was announced. I wanted to be    I sharpened my teeth on the original Medieval TW, then Rome, then Medieval II. But I was always disappointed that the games AI was lacking. Fortunately the modding scene gave me a ton of extra enjoyment out of Medieval II.

    Still, after the debacle of Empire I vowed to never again support this series. I skipped Napoleon, Shogun II, etc. and then Rome II was announced. I wanted to be able to want it, but I just knew I couldn't trust Sega at the helm, and I skipped over it at release time and was happy to have saved the $60 in doing so.

    However, time passes, and I see the Emperors Edition on sale during the holidays for 15 bucks. Well now, let's look at some reviews.....oooh, not bad, alright, I'll take the plunge and give it a go.

    I was pleasantly surprised to find the game played fine at maxed graphic settings and the largest unit sizes with my rig:

    Win 7 64-bit
    8GB Ram
    Radeon 7870 2GB Graphics
    Core i5 Intel Processor

    I've had battles of close to 10,000 troops without any lag or hiccups. I'm currently playing the Grand Campaign on Legendary (although as Rome, so not a huge achievement).

    The diplomacy is still a bit wonky, seems the only thing that truly matters is power. If you're powerful, people will agree to trade. If not, screw you? Then again, Legendary difficulty so I'm sure that has something to do with it.

    The battle AI is improved from previous generations of the game series, although still not perfect. There are plenty of times it ignores an obvious attack point and just rushes troops into a mass in one section instead of flanking (at least in settlement battles where I use the terrain to overcome numerical disadvantages)

    I was never a fan of agents (spys, champions, dignitaries) and I'm still not, but they're there and usable if you want.

    The new province system took some getting used to from earlier titles, but I like it thus far, much easier to manage buildings.

    Now if you don't mind I need to continue my incursion into the Iberian Peninsula and push those pesky Averni out. They've been raiding my lands by traversing through Massili territory and the two legions I just landed on their shores are about to give them a nasty surprise.    … Expand
  8. Axlyss
    Dec 30, 2014
    9
    The game is fixed enough at this time to actually play and yes have fun.
    Campaigns are awesome including the new Augustus campaign (its new to me).
    The A.I still holds it back and so do the battlefield maps which still seem to be randomly generated..
    Other than that its Rome 2 WITHOUT the A.I that bunch up into balls. Rome2 A.I clump still not as bad as rome 1..
  9. LosingStreak
    Dec 25, 2014
    2
    I gave this game a year to fix itself from the terrible release state but it still has glaring problems.

    Bad UI that fails at showing you unit status whilst at the same time blocking a big part of the screen Poor optimization Confusing unit cards Stale battles due to scripted kill moves Units don't feel like they have weight when they collide Politics suck and is a useless gimmick    I gave this game a year to fix itself from the terrible release state but it still has glaring problems.

    Bad UI that fails at showing you unit status whilst at the same time blocking a big part of the screen
    Poor optimization
    Confusing unit cards
    Stale battles due to scripted kill moves
    Units don't feel like they have weight when they collide
    Politics suck and is a useless gimmick
    No avatar conquest mode    … Expand
  10. patriotnations1
    Dec 20, 2014
    0
    I had more fun writing a negative review of this game than playing the game. Just because the game isnt completely broken anymore does not mean it is better than the TW games before it. Okay cool the game works now but so what.

    1. Emperor Edition or not, the principle of Day 1 DLC and other DLC that should have been in the game (Blood and Gore) is just a slap in the face to hardcore    I had more fun writing a negative review of this game than playing the game. Just because the game isnt completely broken anymore does not mean it is better than the TW games before it. Okay cool the game works now but so what.

    1. Emperor Edition or not, the principle of Day 1 DLC and other DLC that should have been in the game (Blood and Gore) is just a slap in the face to hardcore fans. Also the Day 1 DLC had units/factions that were included in Rome 1. Another slap in the face.

    2. Menu system looks terrible, no scroll/paper parchment just grey operating system boxes. Kills the mood. Also the logical design of the campaign menus is a total step backward from previous games. It feels like there is **** popping up everywhere and it is difficult to navigate to what you need.

    3. Campaign map is not cool. It may look good for the first few seconds that you see it but dealing with it ends up being a pain in the butt. Layering settlements within provinces is just confusing and unessesary

    4. Game fails to lure you in turn after turn by disregarding too many features that allow you to geek out to the game. No family tree, random generals, The "motion Icons" for characters look like **** and should honestly just be a picture like previous games. No faction ranking stats.

    5. Politics seems boring and adds nothing to the fun of the game. Cant be bothered to even know what it is.

    6. Bought Empire Edition based on testimony that the game was fixed and was not broken. Found out the game still sucks and is unplayable because I could simply pop in Medieval 2 and have more fun. I cant be bothered by this game quite frankly.

    This game is all around NOT fun and worse than most previous titles. DO NOT BUY THIS GAME NO MATTER WHAT COST, you will not enjoy it. IT IS NOT WORTH A DOLLAR BECAUSE YOU WONT STAND TO PLAY IT.

    Every step of this game seems like a chore and a pain in the ass, especially for Total War veterans who were just blindsided by this piece of garbage.    … Expand
  11. Cioby
    Nov 28, 2014
    10
    Rome II was a game I wanted to buy from way before it got released. Even with the small bugs it had at the start, for me it was the best game of the series.
    If we're to compare, Rome 1 still has a **** of bugs and more annoying mechanics/gameplay than Rome 2 had at it's launch time.
    With the Emperor edition, most bugs are now gone, I haven't had a crash in months and I play while    Rome II was a game I wanted to buy from way before it got released. Even with the small bugs it had at the start, for me it was the best game of the series.
    If we're to compare, Rome 1 still has a **** of bugs and more annoying mechanics/gameplay than Rome 2 had at it's launch time.

    With the Emperor edition, most bugs are now gone, I haven't had a crash in months and I play while watching movies or while having other games on the background. For most people that desire something different, there are tons of mods out there that can change everything, the fact that you're too stupid to find them or make your own just proves how your poor opinion of the game shouldn't be taken into consideration. Yet I still prefer the vanilla version with only a few enhancements on visuals or extra troops mods.

    The fact that the game doesn't work on your configuration is not their fault but your manufacturer's. And the system requirements are not as awful as most will have you believe. The biggest plus to the original version is the fact that they fixed the multiplayer (a long time ago), with all the free content or reduced prices on DLCs, this game is much better than those that ask for 20-50$ for extra content.    … Expand
  12. Wulfen
    Nov 26, 2014
    7
    After the Emperor update I really like it now. Sure, it's still not as perfect as Shogun 2. But I strongly recommend everyone who was totally disappointed after release and like the Total War games to give it a second try. Balance, politics, KI - it's all much more worth playing now.
  13. alexmak
    Nov 25, 2014
    8
    I wrote a review for this game when it was released in 2013, and in it I said "through patching and mods ... a true gem of a game will emerge from the flawed vanilla version". And it is my opinion that his has taken place. while the original release was nothing but a mountain of shame, the Emperor Edition is what the game should have been from the start. Since this edition, I have notI wrote a review for this game when it was released in 2013, and in it I said "through patching and mods ... a true gem of a game will emerge from the flawed vanilla version". And it is my opinion that his has taken place. while the original release was nothing but a mountain of shame, the Emperor Edition is what the game should have been from the start. Since this edition, I have not noticed any bugs, the AI is vastly improved, and the game can finally be enjoyed. I use many mods and they greatly improve an already good game. I give it a 8/10 with a conflicting feelings, because it seems as if it doesn't deserve a high score only because its better than the broken original release. But it is a fun game now, and worth the money.… Expand
  14. LD9000
    Nov 10, 2014
    10
    AAA epicness all around.
    I loved the original Rome and played it a few times over, yet even on the hardest difficulty it was too easy - flaming arrows, pin enemy from front, hit in the back, rinse repeat and you can route even the largest army. I'm really liking the improved combat system, first of all, the operation above while still works, takes a lot more time I've seen ordinary units    AAA epicness all around.
    I loved the original Rome and played it a few times over, yet even on the hardest difficulty it was too easy - flaming arrows, pin enemy from front, hit in the back, rinse repeat and you can route even the largest army. I'm really liking the improved combat system, first of all, the operation above while still works, takes a lot more time I've seen ordinary units stay in battle for 2 minutes while surrounded.

    Additional game mechanics, such as restrictions on the number of armies, agents and fleets are awesome - it focuses on quality rather than quantity.

    Character advancement mechanics are superb - generals, spies and even entire legions get experience and useful traits.

    Simplified province and army management screen, which I originally saw in Shogun2 (and did not like) really works well here. An entire province shares it's recruitment, culture and food buildings.

    Performance wise, I have not had a single hiccup or crash, and even in a gate battle involving 5k units at the gate, I'm still getting 15FPS on "ultra" quality using 3 year old computer (i3 with GTX450).

    Overall, one of the best games I've ever played, cant stop playing it :)    … Expand
  15. Midnightmare
    Oct 24, 2014
    1
    Still the most useless total war game.

    i cant belive people are actully giving this positive reviews now......its a piece of crap compared to the sholders it stands on. The world map is lifeless, internal town management has never been this pointless. research system still bugged so bad that you can push every tech 25% in the game. The AI is the biggest joke ever......the people    Still the most useless total war game.

    i cant belive people are actully giving this positive reviews now......its a piece of crap compared to the sholders it stands on.
    The world map is lifeless, internal town management has never been this pointless.
    research system still bugged so bad that you can push every tech 25% in the game.

    The AI is the biggest joke ever......the people who thinks the AI improved are completely useless players.

    First attept legendary edition with sparta full victory conditions -_-
    I cant even recall losing an fight in it.....it has become an ultra casual game you cant lose even if you give the computer a bone it wont know what to do with it.

    It so bad you can flank the computer with archers and they will run screaming away since the morale system is so broken.    … Expand
  16. rondg95
    Oct 18, 2014
    10
    I bought TW Rome II in May '14 and had been following up the development of the game by CA since it's release in June '13. CA have ceaselessly worked to improve the game and have delivered a masterpiece with the release of the Emperor Edition. With almost all issues fixed and all major changes requested by the community effected, TW Rome II becomes the true successor of the classic game TWI bought TW Rome II in May '14 and had been following up the development of the game by CA since it's release in June '13. CA have ceaselessly worked to improve the game and have delivered a masterpiece with the release of the Emperor Edition. With almost all issues fixed and all major changes requested by the community effected, TW Rome II becomes the true successor of the classic game TW Rome was.… Expand
  17. valfareinwindir
    Oct 10, 2014
    3
    Unbelievable. After deleting Rome 2 off my computer for the worthless s*** that it was, I decided to reinstall after reading such positive reviews for "Emperor Edition" Lo and behold this is still an un-optimised pos. The game is so picky that if you don't have the perfect computer that matches the games specs exactly it won't goddamn work. It still lags, still feels soulless and justUnbelievable. After deleting Rome 2 off my computer for the worthless s*** that it was, I decided to reinstall after reading such positive reviews for "Emperor Edition" Lo and behold this is still an un-optimised pos. The game is so picky that if you don't have the perfect computer that matches the games specs exactly it won't goddamn work. It still lags, still feels soulless and just isn't an engaging total war game. Shogun 2 is still better in every aspect. Please CA, don't use this sh***y engine again.… Expand
  18. Szlomka
    Oct 8, 2014
    0
    This is a marketing ploy aimed at selling the same broken product at full price, a year after release for the jolly price of a working AAA title. I assume some lazy folks might fall for this expecting to get the game and the plethora of DLC's released since launch.

    CAVEAT EMPTOR! Expect to pay an additional hefty fee of 60-ish euros or whatever steam deems the dollar equivalent for    This is a marketing ploy aimed at selling the same broken product at full price, a year after release for the jolly price of a working AAA title. I assume some lazy folks might fall for this expecting to get the game and the plethora of DLC's released since launch.

    CAVEAT EMPTOR!

    Expect to pay an additional hefty fee of 60-ish euros or whatever steam deems the dollar equivalent for the DLC's You "thought" were included.

    The emperor campaign could have safely been released as DLC with yet another letter of apology from CA for the state of the game. Instead the inventive folks at SEGA (probably?) decided to go with this re-release of sorts.

    At best, awarding 1 point here might be warranted for actually releasing content instead of letting the broken code just die. Which of course I won't award.

    I'm personally awaiting a divorce between CA and SEGA and certainly a new engine for the next title, seeing as the current one is beyond redemption.

    In summary, this is not a fixed ROME 2 with DLC included. It's the same old broken rome 2 that was laughed at and belittled by anyone who doesn't take getting robbed and spat on in stride.    … Expand
  19. MaximusHirstius
    Oct 5, 2014
    9
    When the game was first released I was horrified at the condition it was in. I remember when it was so glitchy that I couldn't even land my troops on the beach. However, after just over a year I can finally say I would recommend this game to anyone. I feel that the AI has considerably improved including the siege AI which was a big pain, no more bugs, the game is beautiful, politics systemWhen the game was first released I was horrified at the condition it was in. I remember when it was so glitchy that I couldn't even land my troops on the beach. However, after just over a year I can finally say I would recommend this game to anyone. I feel that the AI has considerably improved including the siege AI which was a big pain, no more bugs, the game is beautiful, politics system has improved and actually feels more important now, game difficulty at Legendary is now a good challenge and CA have been brilliant since the beginning to improve the game the best they could. Although its not the most perfect game in the series, its certainly up there. 9/10… Expand
  20. marmil86
    Oct 5, 2014
    10
    It is great game, improving vastly from its release in all aspects. Developers listened to the fan base and made top total war game ever. I m especially satisfied with the AI, which proves to be a new generation challenging. Great job!
  21. slumpy
    Oct 2, 2014
    0
    People who are too emotionally invested in their purchases are artificially raising this game's score by giving it an entirely undeserved 10 (which I now feel compelled to counter balance by giving it a zero, even though I think it probably deserves a 4 or a 5). If you want an accurate portrayal of what Rome 2 is really like (yes, even after "Emperor Edition"), I'd check the original'sPeople who are too emotionally invested in their purchases are artificially raising this game's score by giving it an entirely undeserved 10 (which I now feel compelled to counter balance by giving it a zero, even though I think it probably deserves a 4 or a 5). If you want an accurate portrayal of what Rome 2 is really like (yes, even after "Emperor Edition"), I'd check the original's Metacritic page.

    http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/total-war-rome-ii    … Expand
  22. Creardo
    Oct 2, 2014
    7
    The game improved and is practically bearable now, many glitches of the release are gone and some good decisions to fix things were made. We have to give it a try.

    But design and concepts are still weak enough to keep at bay any pretensions of the game to deliver us a brand new experience. It´s nothing like that, at all, because the things that made the game annoying theoretically, for    The game improved and is practically bearable now, many glitches of the release are gone and some good decisions to fix things were made. We have to give it a try.

    But design and concepts are still weak enough to keep at bay any pretensions of the game to deliver us a brand new experience. It´s nothing like that, at all, because the things that made the game annoying theoretically, for example the UI and the missing of many old concepts of total war franchise, these misleaded concepts are still in the game (the political mechanics shallowness, the restricted diplomatic options etc).    … Expand
  23. Mrlori95
    Sep 25, 2014
    10
    It is a new game compared with the base edition released last year, great job! The campaign is extremely fun and after everything has been patched/fixed, the Campaign is the funnest of all total wars. Multiplayer is very fun and very much alive. There's basically evryhting You would want from a total war. 28 Factions, 4 campaign packs, a huge diverse roster for all factions, historical battles.
  24. jasper6333
    Sep 22, 2014
    10
    at launch total war rom 2 was a mess. a lot of bugs, ugly textures and a lot of features were missing. but between launch and emperor edition a lot of things have changed. they listened to the community and patched the ain game and now it is playable and a lot of fun.

    Rome 2 emperor edition is a really fun and enjoyable campaign with new factions to play, new units and new buildings.    at launch total war rom 2 was a mess. a lot of bugs, ugly textures and a lot of features were missing. but between launch and emperor edition a lot of things have changed. they listened to the community and patched the ain game and now it is playable and a lot of fun.

    Rome 2 emperor edition is a really fun and enjoyable campaign with new factions to play, new units and new buildings.

    there is one thing to say!

    everyone has to check this out old and new players! you won't rregret it!    … Expand
  25. sloakz
    Sep 21, 2014
    9
    A great game now, A much better game than one year ago. The new included Imperator campaign is fantastic. Lots of patches later and minus the family tree its the Rome game i was after.
  26. DukeMcFishy
    Sep 20, 2014
    9
    After a horrible launch of the game it has matured like a fine wine.
    Most bugs and optimization problems have been ironed out, the new campaign is much more interesting and overall it is now an enjoyable experience.
    The devs could have taken the loss and moved on and let us the consumer out to dry, but they didn't. They spend a lot of resources on fixing the game and addressing some of    After a horrible launch of the game it has matured like a fine wine.
    Most bugs and optimization problems have been ironed out, the new campaign is much more interesting and overall it is now an enjoyable experience.

    The devs could have taken the loss and moved on and let us the consumer out to dry, but they didn't. They spend a lot of resources on fixing the game and addressing some of the complaints and given us a free new campaign. This are signs of a developer that truly cares about their product and their customers. Well done CA. I have a lot of respect for that.

    Total War Rome 2. It began as a horror, but ended up in a love story.    … Expand
  27. ROME2BETRAYAL
    Sep 20, 2014
    8
    Rome 2 Emperor Edition is what Roome 2 Total War should have been at launch more than a year ago. The fact that a buggy, broken, overhyped, underwhelming release are today's videogame industry common practice is only to blame on consumers who are easily carried by mass hysteria, deceit and consumerism wrapped in lies and false promises.

    Rome 2 Emperor Edition as it is today is a must    Rome 2 Emperor Edition is what Roome 2 Total War should have been at launch more than a year ago. The fact that a buggy, broken, overhyped, underwhelming release are today's videogame industry common practice is only to blame on consumers who are easily carried by mass hysteria, deceit and consumerism wrapped in lies and false promises.

    Rome 2 Emperor Edition as it is today is a must PLAY strategy game. Whether people think or think not about it lacking features from previous Total Wars is irrelevant and subjective and whether people think or think not what SEGA/CA have done is right or wrong. From a business perspective they hit the goldmine. From a consumer perspective, they are on my black and torrent lists.

    Enjoy.    … Expand
  28. Mario_x
    Sep 20, 2014
    4
    Sadly, the Empire Edition of Rome II (which is really just Rome II: Gold and therefore not actually a new game) is just as shallow as the game was on release.

    In it's defence, the game is no longer as buggy as it once was and the addition of seasons was nice, but in general, the game still lacks character and is crippled by some horrible design decisions. In addition, things like    Sadly, the Empire Edition of Rome II (which is really just Rome II: Gold and therefore not actually a new game) is just as shallow as the game was on release.

    In it's defence, the game is no longer as buggy as it once was and the addition of seasons was nice, but in general, the game still lacks character and is crippled by some horrible design decisions.

    In addition, things like siege AI and politics whilst now actually working still leave a lot to be desired. For example, the siege AI will buckle if you apply even a modicum of pressure to it since it can only operate competently under preset circumstances.

    Just to provide a list of currently missing features and other problems:
    - No trading settlements.
    - No diplomatic threatening.
    - No wall buildings.
    - No bribing enemy armies.
    - No improvements to client states/satrapies.
    - Ineffective hoplite phalanx animation.
    - No dedicated axe/club animations.
    - Torches are still in the game.
    - No family tree.
    - Disgustingly overpowered and ambiguous agents.
    - Lots of latency issues in multiplayer (which is still bare bones)
    - Skill trees still awkward to find and confusing to understand.
    - Horrible campaign and battle UI (same as on release)
    - Meaningless generals.
    - Nonsensical AI diplomatic decisions.
    - AI general's still regularly suicide themselves.
    - No in depth Roman auxiliary system (in my opinion but there are mods for this).
    - Still waiting on more mod/map tools.

    There is more I could add to this list, but I think that's enough for now. The point is, this isn't a Total War of old, it really still lacks soul and "immersion". The feature strip and bad design decisions have condemned this game to a status of mediocrity in my view. This is not to mention the horrible release of the game of course.    … Expand
  29. shali8
    Sep 20, 2014
    8
    At release the game was buggy, AI was horrible and it was just plain easy except for the horrible balancing for public order on higher level building. That balancing issue was countered by the fact that lower level building were too good. At first I had a system to where I could mindlessly expand, build the same buildings in every province and not have to even look at public order. TheAt release the game was buggy, AI was horrible and it was just plain easy except for the horrible balancing for public order on higher level building. That balancing issue was countered by the fact that lower level building were too good. At first I had a system to where I could mindlessly expand, build the same buildings in every province and not have to even look at public order. The siege AI was so bad I could hold a walled city against a massive force with 1 Pikemen and a half decent spear or sword infantry. Sword infantry on the wall to kill any ladder users (only the unit that placed a ladder would use it) and the pikemen would hold the gate. Then the enemy would assault the gate. Sometimes it would glitch and not destroy the gate just stand there and get shot at by the towers; other times it would destroy the gate then my pikemen would hold the enemy army under the boiling oil of the gate. Politics was a useless and confusing mess. To be honest the whole release was a mess.

    Months went by, with slow agonizing progress. Little improvements: the regular battle AI became passable, a new building chain for minor settlements, several new campaigns (DLC) were added, slowly the higher level buildings became less detrimental to public order, unit packs were released, performance improvements. However it was not until EE was released that I thought the game was making any significant progress.

    I started up a campaign as Lepidus's Rome on the normal difficulty (normal is what I do when a new patch comes out to test it) "Hmm... UI improvements: nice, New campaign looks interesting, very Rome focused." A few turns later I am having mass rebellions "Meh rebels are easy to put down." A few turns later an army of rebels attacks a walled city, one with a rather large army "Oh boy here we go this'll be a massacre." As per usual I set up a defensive formation at the gate and put a few men on the wall to take care of the ladder users. The ladder users approach, and attach the ladders to the wall. Nothing different than normal. Then his army begins to move "That's weird..." His entire army begins to flood up the ladders. My unfortunate wall defenders being beaten by his superior numbers. My best men were guarding the gate I send them onto the wall. My weaker soldiers block my better ones from getting into the fight. My originals wall defenders begin to route. At this point he has disabled the wall turrets "That's not good." In the end my force was defeated and the city was taken. With it much of my income, with my income so handicapped I was hard pressed to take the city back. Then I'm attacked by Pompey. In the end I lose the game, under the combined weight of Pompey, the lost city, and the other rebellions wreaking havoc everywhere. Rome 2 has been much improved. It may not be up to its predecessors level yet, it may never get there, but it is fun and challenging as of now. I give it an 8/10 and I have a tendency to keep things as close to five as possible.    … Expand
  30. reginald
    Sep 20, 2014
    10
    The game in the current state is amazing. Best total war game out there. Great graphics, but you need a good computer, great gameplay and balance too. CA have worked tremendously hard to fix the game and if you're looking for a good historical strategy game, this is the one for you. Don't pay attention to trolls.
prev
Page:

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
tbd

No score yet - based on 2 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2 out of 2
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 2
  3. Negative: 0 out of 2
  1. Ragequit.gr
    Oct 13, 2014
    89
    The technical part remains somewhat problematic, but the rest of the game is of outstanding quality. In terms of grand strategy, it's one of the best games and it can deservedly stand next to its ancestors in the same series. Too bad that, as it seems, the publishers did not give the appropriate time frame to the developers. The potential was there, only more time was needed.
    Read full review
  2. Softpedia
    Sep 17, 2014
    90
    Emperor Edition really shows how much the title from The Creative Assembly has evolved since it was originally delivered and the way the entire experience has been updated based on the needs of the community and the cool ideas of the development team.
    Read full review