Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege

 PC
User Score
7.0

Mixed or average reviews- based on 1890 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1,197 out of 1890
  2. Mixed: 300 out of 1890
  3. Negative: 393 out of 1890
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Hackerbee
    Mar 13, 2018
    6
    Man has this game ever made a turn around, got anticheat, got netcode fixes a ton of content a lot of cheaters have been banned, and there is now a big push to clean up the human garbage out of the ever so toxic community, more recently hackers have managed to bypass battleeye, but the game is still in the best state now than it has ever been, the game has a very steep skill curve, but itMan has this game ever made a turn around, got anticheat, got netcode fixes a ton of content a lot of cheaters have been banned, and there is now a big push to clean up the human garbage out of the ever so toxic community, more recently hackers have managed to bypass battleeye, but the game is still in the best state now than it has ever been, the game has a very steep skill curve, but it is probably one of the single best multiplayer fps games ever made now, it looses points due to Ubisoft botching the launch and taking 2 years to get their **** together with this game, and 2 more points for launching without anticheat back in the day. but it is a great game now and @ 20$ for the starter edition well worth your money if you like team based fps games.

    Old review from when the game first came out:

    This game gets a 2 for only after a year getting a real anticheat (Battle eye), and for the incredible destructibility that the environments in the game offer. albeit to late to make this game what it could have been.
    The game has way to much interp, and has a very real problem with people exploiting the **** netcode and ping advantage afforded by this.
    This game had the potential to have over throne CSGO as the big competitive shooter, but languished in Ubisofts incompetent hands, game breaking bug after game breaking bug fixed and then introduced by Ubisoft, and day one issues that continue to plague this game to this day. most glaring of which is the **** netcode, and broken matchmaker that can leave you sitting in queue for upwards of 40 mins, in some cases in ranked. it completely kills the momentum of the game, but that is not even what really killed this game, no its death came early right at launch when this game was left with no anticheat what so ever for at least 3 months before "Fairfight" came, and even then it was highly ineffectual to the point that the game became unplayable due to the amount of rampaging wallhackers in the community. only after the introduction of Battleeye did the game really show its true potential, while still being hamstrung by **** netcode and broken matchmaker. This game is a prime example of how a big name Developer can absolutely destroy a great idea.    … Expand
  2. Angmax55
    Mar 2, 2018
    10
    This game isn’t perfect, but I still gave it a 10 because it has hooked me for 700+ hours now with all its new content being added and unique tactical gameplay. It will kick down in the first few hours of play, but I guarantee you will learn from your mistakes and finally reach a point where you can understand why I love this game so much. Must pick this up!
  3. chocobreak
    Feb 23, 2018
    10
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Finally FPS which requires usage of brain unlike some retarded CoD or one of the million CoD clones.
    Awesome maps, destructible environment, great weapons, unlocks etc. GOTY material.    … Expand
  4. SaydaNeen
    Feb 19, 2018
    8
    Awesome game, i do very much love this game. 2 marks lost because of team killers and sometimes toxic community. I haven't come across cheaters yet or noticed it i guess but when a 12 year old says "I hate this map, i'm just going to team kill." it just removes the fun. There needs to be consequences for stuff like that otherwise it makes a toxic environment. It wouldn't be hard to setAwesome game, i do very much love this game. 2 marks lost because of team killers and sometimes toxic community. I haven't come across cheaters yet or noticed it i guess but when a 12 year old says "I hate this map, i'm just going to team kill." it just removes the fun. There needs to be consequences for stuff like that otherwise it makes a toxic environment. It wouldn't be hard to set something up where a match is red flagged for the admins when a team kill happens followed by a report, come on UBI. Other than that operators are pretty well balanced and fun, love the tactical and teamplay, not very many games gives you this kind of play.… Expand
  5. OptimusBlyad
    Feb 11, 2018
    2
    **** this game, I smashed my mouse for 50 euros, headphones also barely go to me, anti-cheat is **** in older games there is no such problem, for example cs 1.6. Do you enter the game what greets you? A child is tearing at the whole house. And in the second team? ****ing cheaters who not pick you but he kill you, and on the demo it's like he got out in the middle. And hitbox, you shoot in**** this game, I smashed my mouse for 50 euros, headphones also barely go to me, anti-cheat is **** in older games there is no such problem, for example cs 1.6. Do you enter the game what greets you? A child is tearing at the whole house. And in the second team? ****ing cheaters who not pick you but he kill you, and on the demo it's like he got out in the middle. And hitbox, you shoot in the head and he do not get anything, he shoots you in the arm, and you get in the head, logic.… Expand
  6. francesco170503
    Jan 30, 2018
    10
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This is a game with the best graphic ever, you can play it with a team or in solo but it still the best game i have ever play. In terms of cost it doesn't cost too much; it is really affordable. i really suggest it.… Expand
  7. Jonnif1
    Jan 28, 2018
    4
    Average
    Might be one of the best games , but under Ubisoft they ruined it
    First of all in the beginning the game was so cool and realistic now it seems a cartoon game more likely Overwatch than hunting Terrorists As every game of Ubisoft you must have a premade team to play if you don't have premade team you have trouble since the enemy team might be premade team even in Casual which    Average
    Might be one of the best games , but under Ubisoft they ruined it
    First of all in the beginning the game was so cool and realistic now it seems a cartoon game
    more likely Overwatch than hunting Terrorists
    As every game of Ubisoft you must have a premade team to play
    if you don't have premade team you have trouble since the enemy team
    might be premade team even in Casual which is not fair for low levels players
    and that s why people quit , but I don't wonder since is an Ubisoft game
    and I can't expect the best , in the last years I am very negative towards Ubisoft .    … Expand
  8. Azog95
    Jan 24, 2018
    9
    wow, amazing game and original one, u can't find another r6 game in last 10 years.
  9. serhi16
    Jan 22, 2018
    10
    Игра супер всем рекомендую реально тактический шутер от первого лица
  10. desistodavida66
    Jan 19, 2018
    10
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. thats one of the best games i ve ever played and ubisoft is doing a perfect job with the game 1010… Expand
  11. Ansatsu83
    Jan 10, 2018
    1
    Rainbow six games, to me, have always been about a decent counter terrorism story, loadout customization, and terrorist hunt. This game has almost none of this. It is a multiplayer centered shooter, where terrorist hunt is frowned upon because it does not provide enough of a reward, so not many people play it. Loadouts are another huge issue for me. The weapons are specific to the factionRainbow six games, to me, have always been about a decent counter terrorism story, loadout customization, and terrorist hunt. This game has almost none of this. It is a multiplayer centered shooter, where terrorist hunt is frowned upon because it does not provide enough of a reward, so not many people play it. Loadouts are another huge issue for me. The weapons are specific to the faction a character is from. In rb6, its made up of forces from all over the world, so why cant I select any weapon from all over the world, too? As for the story, apparently the game asks "What's Story?" cause there is none. This is a slap in the face to Tom Clancy and is very much intended to be a mulitplayer 5v5 shooter with the wrong label slapped on it. Should have just been called Siege as its not rainbow six.… Expand
  12. Mitya64
    Jan 4, 2018
    8
    Отличная графика. Хорошая оптиммизация. Высокое качество звука. Высокий порог вхождения. Требования к командной работе. Отличная физика. Мало режимов. Нет сингла. Много персов. Куча карт. Плохой неткод.Нет русских серверов. Спавкиллеры. Отличный геймплей. Куча скинов и т.д. Наиграл 200ч и рекомендую вам брать эту игру с друзьями. 9 из 10Отличная графика. Хорошая оптиммизация. Высокое качество звука. Высокий порог вхождения. Требования к командной работе. Отличная физика. Мало режимов. Нет сингла. Много персов. Куча карт. Плохой неткод.Нет русских серверов. Спавкиллеры. Отличный геймплей. Куча скинов и т.д. Наиграл 200ч и рекомендую вам брать эту игру с друзьями. 9 из 10
  13. Lucifer_210
    Dec 29, 2017
    9
    Unlike games such as CS:GO, Ubisoft focusses this game on intense tactics, teamwork, and strategy. The wide variety of Operators keeps the player interested, though another gamemode could be beneficial in terms of gameplay diversity.
  14. KillsHappen
    Nov 27, 2017
    0
    2 months after "operation healt" old bugs are back + new bugs, poor anticheat, a loots of smurf in game. True game looks nice and ubi have nice idea to make game but it's not all... if i will life only from my ideas i will don't life more than one week!!
    **** this and ubi
  15. muzmuz
    Nov 24, 2017
    10
    Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege is a completely tactical first person shooter that requires patience, carefulness, and some brain matter. I have never enjoyed a multiplayer shooter as much as I enjoyed Rainbow Six Siege with its immersive and heart-pumping methodical combat mechanic.
  16. KittyWhisky
    Oct 21, 2017
    10
    Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege is a game "from love to hatred". Games should evoke emotion, and "the Siege" with this excellent cope. In one game you can experience the as delight and anger. Players of the Russian region is particularly acquainted - we have never had less than 50 ping. But with 100 ping, the game makes you hate on a regular basis.

    Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege is a    Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege is a game "from love to hatred". Games should evoke emotion, and "the Siege" with this excellent cope. In one game you can experience the as delight and anger. Players of the Russian region is particularly acquainted - we have never had less than 50 ping. But with 100 ping, the game makes you hate on a regular basis.

    Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege is a tactical shooter, in which there are destructible, which also need to be use tactically. It's a good game lures - their capabilities. Here you can not just stupid to get in to the enemy through the door and break through the wall, ceiling, blow the door, and the opponent will be confused "where am I to watch?!". Outside you can climb down the wall on ropes, punching the window, hanging and upside down (which at first familiar, but you can get used to) - it is also necessary to use, as the enemy often does not expect. There are different ways to break through walls and other fortifications to strengthen the walls, set various traps. And operatives must have individual abilities and their weapons. All this makes the game insanely replayable, and just a Paradise for lovers to play it on tactics. We also have a drone (team attack), which can be used to mark opponents, and just to check if everything is "clean". In this game, don't just go ahead. Usually you can go to the desired object from about three sides, and even more. And if you know that if you go just like a sheep forward, you die, then you just need to go to the other side and to catch opponents off guard. And it seems so logical, but no, a stupid to go ahead without checking your drone is there ahead of the enemy. This game is about careful gameplay.

    You've planned everything, you're done, you know exactly what is going to kill the opponents, but here comes Ubisoft with their network code that wrote Indian the heel of the left foot. The problems can be different from the second podlaha before his sudden departure from the session. Ubisoft are really trying to fix things, and now it's playing without problems, but you still can kill enemy when you noticed him only a second while on his cell tupil you almost half a minute. Hate it. Due to these technical situations, and many others and I want the hell to remove this horrible game. But the gameplay makes you run, "the Siege" again and again. And when everything turns out as you planned, really enjoy it.

    The game has no story, stand-alone company, there is only multiplayer. To familiarize yourself with the mechanics is "Operation". And it would be better for the beginner to get them to watch the introductory videos, and then only to go into the game. "Siege" requires direct hands, the weapon happens with a character, you also need to know the map, and then you just have no escape routes or don't know how to get around the enemy. Of course, one must know and operatives for whom you play. All of its pluses and minuses. Operatives in the game is not enough, and there will be more. In the "Antiterror" you can train against bots. On the complexity of "Realism" bots are very good, it is generally one of the most intelligent bots to rebuild. take you to the hearing, bypass. This mode is useful for beginners, as there you will get acquainted with the operative and weapons. The gun shoots great, the sound is excellent. But some of the guns look much viagraxna (especially with ACOG). With automatic Ash or famas from Twich much better put headshots. But sometimes ubisoft and shotguns kill for a couple of meters (as it was when I added just Frost). Headshots are literally with one shot (as it should be), but in Siege it may not be skill, but simply luck. The enemy can shoot at you from a vending machine Bandit and one of the twenty bullets will hit you and you die. Hate it. Hitboxes in this game at all bothered. Different investigators different armored is a bit of a controversial decision.

    Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege despite all the technical flaws and the occasional controversial decisions by the dev team, this is a great tactical multiplayer shooter with insane replayability, and gameplay that gives you many opportunities. The game clearly goes for the emotions. It's just the orgasm at the tips of ecstasy!    … Expand
  17. GFGeclipse
    Oct 11, 2017
    7
    R6: Siege is Ubisoft's attempt to kill two birds with one stone by reviving a previously established IP and using a fast pass ticket into the competitive e-sports industry with one title. In doing so all they have established is that they can make games that are flawed by technical faults that heavily detract from an otherwise enjoyable experience.
    You assume the role as one of 33    R6: Siege is Ubisoft's attempt to kill two birds with one stone by reviving a previously established IP and using a fast pass ticket into the competitive e-sports industry with one title. In doing so all they have established is that they can make games that are flawed by technical faults that heavily detract from an otherwise enjoyable experience.
    You assume the role as one of 33 playable operators, each with a unique and distinguished special ability, and play alongside four other players in 5v5 multiplayer attack versus defend game modes. Round are respawn-free, meaning if you die, you're out until the next round.
    Multiplayer is where this game is significantly flawed, which on further inspection is a big concern considering that this game is a multiplayer game.
    A reporting functionality does exist, something that is a must have for every multiplayer game, but despite this, it never seems to actually do anything. This is partially due to the consistent influx of hackers that swarm multiplayer games throughout the year, and also down to the fact that users reporting other players don't receive any form of communication on what action was eventually taken on the reported player, if any was taken at all!
    The matchmaking system is inherently flawed, and new players can expect themselves to be paired up with other new players against a team full of people that should be competing for thousands of dollars in the competitive pro league.
    The game is also riddled with bugs and glitches; some of which are addressed, but most of which are described as 'identified by the development team' and no more. So much so that they even skipped a whole DLC to provide a 'season long' (3 months) period of updates exclusively aimed at fixing issues, which was aptly named 'Operation Health'. Many players (including myself) will tell you that although this season fixed many bugs, for every bug that was fixed, another 10+ were introduced.
    It is evident by all of these attempts that Ubisoft are trying to fix this game to a point where it would excel at being a great tactical multiplayer shooter, but seasoned game design veterans like themselves should know that simply trying is not enough to meet today's industry expectation.
    As with most Ubisoft games, they try to emphasize the highly accurate and realistic visual graphics. What actually happened at launch was a terrible mess of broken lighting in nearly every inch of your screen, and textures that simply didn't live up to the expectations that Ubisoft themselves set during their E3 demo.
    As time has gone on, they have got much better, and the next update promises to improve the overall graphical quality of the game, so I have no real basis to fault them on in the graphics department writing today in 2017. Had I been writing this review a year ago, we may have seen a different story being presented.
    Player progression is an aspect of R6: Siege that I often find being misinterpreted by reviewers who haven't explored the game far enough to understand how player progression actually works. Ubisoft offers two versions of the game, the starter edition, and the standard edition. This pricing model allows gamers who aren't completely sold on the game to purchase a cheaper version where they don't instantly start with a large collection of operators (classes) to play with. They can then choose to unlock these operators with in-game currency, which cannot be purchased with real life money. This is a great move by Ubisoft which allows all players, independent of financial capacity, to experience all of the different operators in the game.
    Gameplay mechanics are where Rainbow Six: Siege properly excels. Players can use RC drones with built in cameras to scope out areas of the map before engaging, and many operators have different traps and gadgets to apply a multitude of effects (both positive and negative) to players who happen to stumble across them, ranging from concussion mines to toxic smoke canisters. These mechanics provide a fun and unique playing experience with a map that is dynamically changing throughout the round, promoting players to think on their feet and adapt to the present situation. This plays well into the re-playability of the game; you are almost guaranteed to never have a match that plays out in a predictable scenario that you have experienced before.
    Options menus are where most PC games fall very short of the mark, but R6: Siege is an exception to this. The game features a highly extensive yet immensely intuitive settings screen, and good news for some gamers, the game features out-of-the-box ultrawide 21:9 aspect ratio support. The 'Ultra HD texture pack' that they offer, which is more than 20 gigabytes in size, doesn't seem to offer any form of improvement to the graphics unless you're using a fancy Dell 8K monitor, but heavily decreases the frame rate of the game, so unless you want to be the very best, you'll probably want to pass on that option.    … Expand
  18. cilmon
    Sep 18, 2017
    9
    For those players who look for a game that requires strategy, deep map learning, improvisation and serious team communication "Rainbow Six: Siege" is a must.
    It's not only about destruction of the maps or gun-play, this game is unique providing immersion and really movie-like situations, it gives you the opportunity to feel like a real swat member.
    We are not talking about an easy and    For those players who look for a game that requires strategy, deep map learning, improvisation and serious team communication "Rainbow Six: Siege" is a must.
    It's not only about destruction of the maps or gun-play, this game is unique providing immersion and really movie-like situations, it gives you the opportunity to feel like a real swat member.
    We are not talking about an easy and friendly game, "Rainbow Six: Siege" requires learning and practice but once you're in it becomes a drug. Not everyone is gonna like it, but the people who play more than 15 hours will love it.
    All DLCs, players and maps are for free to all players and the developers are doing a very good job improving the game and listening carefully to the community.    … Expand
  19. HappyPhilXD
    Sep 16, 2017
    5
    So, the game is in Beta since launch (don't miss that beta sign when entering multiplayer) it's still haveing a big ptoblem with hacks they can't detect and the massive netcode problem and pings are all over the place. And then they want you to pay for 2 Season passes for a game in beta.
  20. Sesshomurai
    Aug 29, 2017
    7
    As others have mentioned, there are some "iconic" features of a R6 game that should not be removed. These are 1) A single player campaign. Clancy was an author. he wrote stories. The stories are interesting. Let's not betray that. 2) 3rd person duck and cover. R6 Vegas nailed this. It was hallmark feature and never quite equaled elsewhere. Where is it? 3) Load outs? Character creation?As others have mentioned, there are some "iconic" features of a R6 game that should not be removed. These are 1) A single player campaign. Clancy was an author. he wrote stories. The stories are interesting. Let's not betray that. 2) 3rd person duck and cover. R6 Vegas nailed this. It was hallmark feature and never quite equaled elsewhere. Where is it? 3) Load outs? Character creation? styling? What was once great about R6 was it put YOU in the role of R6 spec ops. YOU were calling the shots. YOU were leading your team. YOU were making the story. Not this minimap mayhem shootfest. And what is with these shields? The whole beauty of R6 is they are stealth. Not stand your ground behind a blast shield in a force-on-force shoot-em-up......what is this?… Expand
  21. Traslogan
    Aug 24, 2017
    5
    We're into the 2nd year of this product being considered fully launched on the market, but it's only ranked mode is still in beta...
    There's no requirements for getting into ranked, and the devs spam free-weekends so often that it's about as bad as finding servers full of 12-year-olds who just learned how to turn a computer on.
    There's a lot you can say about Siege that is positive,    We're into the 2nd year of this product being considered fully launched on the market, but it's only ranked mode is still in beta...
    There's no requirements for getting into ranked, and the devs spam free-weekends so often that it's about as bad as finding servers full of 12-year-olds who just learned how to turn a computer on.

    There's a lot you can say about Siege that is positive, but the developers, even during this "operation health" project that they've claimed will improve the game, are never fixing the critical issues that make the game have no incentive for you to even try and play.

    A few examples:
    It takes 10 games to get a rank assigned in Ranked mode. The game rigs the 10 games so you are almost always with randoms and usually other unranked players, but rarely against other unranked players and usually organized teams.
    Upon being ranked, you will be given a poor rank thanks to this even if you perform well (Because the rank system is extremely volatile and even if you get 30 kills, losing is still that punishing), and you will begin waiting 10-15 minutes for a game because it now refuses to put you with anyone other than those at said horrendous ranks, but the game will continue to tell you that you will only wait 1 -2 minutes, and will continue blatantly lying at all times.
    There's no requirements for people to have before playing Ranked, so people jump straight into Ranked and ruin it for everyone else after just learning the keybinds in on game of casual. This is a problem with the community, but it's one that is critical and fixable by the devs.

    The only reason this game hasn't become as horrendous as Counter Strike Global Offensive is because, unlike Valve, they haven't started banning people for complaining on the forums. Yet.    … Expand
  22. Voodoo123
    Jul 15, 2017
    9
    Prepare for infinite adapt or die cat & mouse gameplay. This is a game I keep coming back to for the heart pounding tension of never quite knowing what each new round will bring. For every advantage a new tactic or operator brings you, the accidental genius of the other 9 people playing the game with you will blow your mind (and your chosen operator) away. I highly recommend playing withPrepare for infinite adapt or die cat & mouse gameplay. This is a game I keep coming back to for the heart pounding tension of never quite knowing what each new round will bring. For every advantage a new tactic or operator brings you, the accidental genius of the other 9 people playing the game with you will blow your mind (and your chosen operator) away. I highly recommend playing with keyboard and mouse for this one using a controller puts you at serious disadvantage as there is no online aim assist in place for this game.… Expand
  23. jeanphilt
    Jul 3, 2017
    8
    It's really similar to CS:GO so if you like it, you might like R6 Siege.
    But if you are a fan of Battlefield, then this game is probably not for you.
    It's really "camping oriented" and the pace is really slow. It's limited to 5 vs 5 so it's harder to find friends to play with when compared to Battlefield. Indeed, ideally, you need 5 players, no more, not less while in Battlefield, it's    It's really similar to CS:GO so if you like it, you might like R6 Siege.
    But if you are a fan of Battlefield, then this game is probably not for you.
    It's really "camping oriented" and the pace is really slow.
    It's limited to 5 vs 5 so it's harder to find friends to play with when compared to Battlefield.
    Indeed, ideally, you need 5 players, no more, not less while in Battlefield, it's less important and you can have many squads of 5 players ...

    It's a simple multiplayer game with no real single player mode.
    I played for about 10 hours and I feel already bored by the game.
    While I think Battlefield could be more tactical, R6 is just too limited for me.
    Despite the various operators (20) and maps (15) for now, the gameplay is quite repetitive.

    Edit : after reaching level 15 and getting more used to the game and watching serenity17 videos on youtube, and playing with my team on discord, I can understand a little more what people like about this game and I've started to like it    … Expand
  24. Tomle1202
    Jul 2, 2017
    8
    Rainbow Six Siege is not the kind of game that you can love everything about, but fortunately it gives you enough moments to still appreciate its thrilling tactical gameplay.
  25. alecblaster
    Jun 19, 2017
    0
    buggy hit boxes
    non-existing hit registration
    broken matchmaking
    potato servers
    extremely high ping
    indestructible objects
    unbalanced maps and operators
    the worst net code ive ever seen
    did i mention the buggy hit boxes and non-existing hit registration?
  26. Critical-Hit
    May 30, 2017
    0
    This game is out for a year and half. And its like this:
    Hello everybody and welcome to Jackass...oh wait...sorry...welcome to Rainbow Six Siege which is quite the same. Enjoy lags, bugs, cheaters and broken hit boxes (now quite fixed). Test your internet connection in 5 vs 5 team death-match, where tactics and objective doesn't matter. Here your skill or tactical knowledge is nothing, if    This game is out for a year and half. And its like this:
    Hello everybody and welcome to Jackass...oh wait...sorry...welcome to Rainbow Six Siege which is quite the same. Enjoy lags, bugs, cheaters and broken hit boxes (now quite fixed). Test your internet connection in 5 vs 5 team death-match, where tactics and objective doesn't matter. Here your skill or tactical knowledge is nothing, if your opponent has better connection or cheats. You will be pared with players with higher or lower levels or ranks, which are not even close to yours. Enjoy your silver skill getting smashed by platins and diamods, who are really good, cheaters or ESL players with new accounts. Try all different weapons and find out, that shotguns are sniper rifles and sniper rifle does same damage as pistols. Let's kill a man (or woman) with half of the magazine from your machine gun to the head or with just 3 shots from a pistol to the body. With our anti-cheat placebo (FairFight and BattlEye) you can report who you want, because it doesn't work. You're reporting to FairFight, but BattlEye gives bans. Logic.exe not found...    … Expand
  27. Snails
    May 25, 2017
    2
    Replayability is key here. The game relies too much on multiplayer to make the game fun but its dead. As for single-player they threw in some missions that you have no control over what you want to take, such as gear, equipment, character, guns, etc. I don't even call it single-player, more of just "Look see we made offline missions now shut up." After you beat those in a few hours thereReplayability is key here. The game relies too much on multiplayer to make the game fun but its dead. As for single-player they threw in some missions that you have no control over what you want to take, such as gear, equipment, character, guns, etc. I don't even call it single-player, more of just "Look see we made offline missions now shut up." After you beat those in a few hours there is terrorist hunt mode which is just a wave survival. Don't get me wrong here its a good looking game and it plays nice but thats about it. Nothing TO PLAY. If they would have put some sort of custom missions that would have been a different story. I was expecting a lot more. Oh well back to the SWAT games.… Expand
  28. Cech
    May 16, 2017
    2
    Главная ошибка при покупке этой части R6 - думать, что вы покупаете тактический шутер.

    Игра вызывает двойственные чувства. Как тайтл R6 игра тянет на 2/10 - общего со всей серией радуги нет, развитие серии пришло к казуальщине. Что по ощущениям представляет из себя игра - call of duty.. или мод на неё Нужен ли был серии R6 мультиплеер вместо ко-оп? - Нет Было бы хорошо выпустить    Главная ошибка при покупке этой части R6 - думать, что вы покупаете тактический шутер.

    Игра вызывает двойственные чувства. Как тайтл R6 игра тянет на 2/10 - общего со всей серией радуги нет, развитие серии пришло к казуальщине. Что по ощущениям представляет из себя игра - call of duty.. или мод на неё

    Нужен ли был серии R6 мультиплеер вместо ко-оп? - Нет

    Было бы хорошо выпустить редкую за последние годы игру про полицию и их спецотряды? - Да (но не про тренирующиеся друг с другом)

    "Только мультиплеер" привёл игру к балансным вещам, которые по факту выглядят убого, вооружение и прочие девайсы даже сложно описать словом абсурд, особенно посмеялся с тачанки и прочих стволов из 43го. Скоро добавят арбалет, так что стоит ждать совместку (в рекламных целях это не редкость) с Chivalry и появления оперативника в латах с луком. Проломы стен, разрушение объектов - всё выглядит смешно, даже такая игра как контр-страйк на её фоне выглядит симулятором спецназа. А АХТУНГ: R6 был симулятором, тут ничего общего с этим, казуальщина для сельской местности

    Не известно то, что нас ждало в отменённой "Patriots", но уверенность в том, что эта игра попала "мимо" не покидает игрока. Как f2p игра и (без шуток) конкурент Warface или Point Blank неплохо, но это не ААА тайтл ни в какой вселенной, а побаловаться пару часиков можно

    2/10    … Expand
  29. DatBoiKapachino
    May 15, 2017
    10
    Siege is a pretty good game, lots of bugs tho.. this game would be 10/10 if it was bug free.... but now with Operation Health (going to fix just about everything) on the way this game is on the right path to becoming the best game ive ever played!...
  30. ShadowWarriorL
    May 5, 2017
    0
    Hey there. I’m here to give anyone that’s willing to listen my opinion on a game I’ve been playing for quite some time—Rainbow 6 Siege. I’m just going to get right to the point:
    Siege might have been the best FPS I’ve ever played, but it ends up falling so flat that it hurts. It’s one of those games that most people classify as having potential—but just to waste it and not do what    Hey there. I’m here to give anyone that’s willing to listen my opinion on a game I’ve been playing for quite some time—Rainbow 6 Siege. I’m just going to get right to the point:
    Siege might have been the best FPS I’ve ever played, but it ends up falling so flat that it hurts. It’s one of those games that most people classify as having potential—but just to waste it and not do what could’ve been done several times better. I’m not saying that Siege has to meet every single one of my expectations, or that it needs to be what I want it to be—I’m trying to say that as a game in its genre it needs to cover some bases before even trying to be an FPS.
    I’m talking about net code, fixing the issue with peekers advantage, giving spawn protection to attackers for a few seconds to protect them from spawn camping, and lastly preventing players with more latency to benefit from said latency. These are things that have a DIRECT influence in the way people play the game. It affects how each round plays out, how encounters work, and how players approach the game. If you know that you will have an advantage over someone if you peek them first, you’re more than likely going to run in and go for a peek. If you know you can get one or two picks at the very start of the round, you’re more than likely going to take the risk and take out those key ops. If you see you’re connected to a server and you’re lagging a bit—and you have peekers advantage, you’re more than likely going to run in first.
    Most people take any advantage they can get. And are they to blame? No, I can’t say they are. I myself am guilty of peeking outside, spawn killing, and rushing in. If my team is down by one, or if we’re tied up, or if the other team is outperforming us by using these things to their advantage, why am I going to take it? I won’t.
    And here is where my problem with this game really comes in: it almost forces you to accommodate your play style to these factors. Most matches play out the same way now. The same repetitious outside peeking, excessive rushing, defenders not doing their job—which is defending the objective, etc. I feel like as a player, I’ve lost the advantage in being to choose the way I play the game. I feel constrained in my choices in play-style because everything I’ve tried doesn’t work. I don’t really like the way I have to play the game now, but because it works I do it. And that’s where the game becomes just about winning and that’s where the fun factor ends for me. I try my best to only play when my friends are online as well. When they aren’t, I stick to terrorist hunt. But when they are on, they ultimately suffer the same fate—and for the most part, share the same opinion.
    Lastly, I feel like the game puts too much of a focus on adding in new operators. It is clearly an important part of the game and helps to “shift the meta”, but the season passes and the constant weapon skin additions really just detracts from what I would consider other important content. And by content I mean fixing the stuff that I’ve mentioned earlier. I’m not about to claim that I know anything and everything about how to manage a game like Siege, but from my perspective I’d shift focus.
    In summation, the problem I have with this game currently is that it lacks the foundation it needs to support its wonderful concept. It focuses too much on other things—like weapon skins and other gear—when it should be directing its focus on what makes the game function. By allowing problems like peekers advantage, spawn killing, and using latency as an advantage, the game shoots itself in the foot. It limits the player’s choices regarding play-style tremendously, and instead of building on its concept—it stunts its growth. You can’t build a house without a solid foundation.    … Expand
Page:

Awards & Rankings

82
#82 Best PC Game of 2015
6
#6 Most Discussed PC Game of 2015
16
#16 Most Shared PC Game of 2015

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
79

Generally favorable reviews - based on 37 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 29 out of 37
  2. Mixed: 8 out of 37
  3. Negative: 0 out of 37
  1. Pelit (Finland)
    Mar 3, 2016
    86
    An excellent and innovative breath of fresh air. The more I play, the more I like. I hope this is new role model for shooters to come. [Jan 2016]
  2. CD-Action
    Feb 4, 2016
    70
    Siege’s multiplayer mode with its hectic pace and unpredictability seems to have a huge e-sport potential but with random teammates is often unplayable. [01/2016, p.52]
  3. Game World Navigator Magazine
    Jan 20, 2016
    80
    Unfortunately, there aren’t that many maps available, but each one of them has lots of details and alternate routes, like basements and balconies. Even the airplane is much more complex than the archetypical “long tube with seats.” [Issue#205, p.48]
See all critic reviews »