Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege

 PC
User Score
7.0

Mixed or average reviews- based on 1890 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1,197 out of 1890
  2. Mixed: 300 out of 1890
  3. Negative: 393 out of 1890
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Pipemastersven
    Dec 1, 2015
    7
    Very hardcore and tactical gameplay - quite punishing if you're up against a good team -- picked it up for around 30USD - so not fussed about value for money;
    A bit of a shame that there is no story line and multiple loadouts -- def. not worth $60+ like some people are paying
  2. Sesshomurai
    Aug 29, 2017
    7
    As others have mentioned, there are some "iconic" features of a R6 game that should not be removed. These are 1) A single player campaign. Clancy was an author. he wrote stories. The stories are interesting. Let's not betray that. 2) 3rd person duck and cover. R6 Vegas nailed this. It was hallmark feature and never quite equaled elsewhere. Where is it? 3) Load outs? Character creation?As others have mentioned, there are some "iconic" features of a R6 game that should not be removed. These are 1) A single player campaign. Clancy was an author. he wrote stories. The stories are interesting. Let's not betray that. 2) 3rd person duck and cover. R6 Vegas nailed this. It was hallmark feature and never quite equaled elsewhere. Where is it? 3) Load outs? Character creation? styling? What was once great about R6 was it put YOU in the role of R6 spec ops. YOU were calling the shots. YOU were leading your team. YOU were making the story. Not this minimap mayhem shootfest. And what is with these shields? The whole beauty of R6 is they are stealth. Not stand your ground behind a blast shield in a force-on-force shoot-em-up......what is this?… Expand
  3. Indrigis
    Feb 14, 2016
    7
    My biggest problem with R6S is the amount of pointless restrictions and omissions in the game.

    Defenders can block doors and use remote explosives but don't get shields, flashbangs or decent DMRs; attackers are not allowed to use the heartbeat sensor or block the doorways behind them. There are no destructible light sources or thermal scopes. Even though there are cameras in the game,    My biggest problem with R6S is the amount of pointless restrictions and omissions in the game.

    Defenders can block doors and use remote explosives but don't get shields, flashbangs or decent DMRs; attackers are not allowed to use the heartbeat sensor or block the doorways behind them. There are no destructible light sources or thermal scopes. Even though there are cameras in the game, motion detection alarms are not an option. It's as if Ubisoft were trying to make Counter-Strike with mutually exclusive classes instead of a proper next gen squad tactical game with customizable loadouts.

    While the maps are decent, they also have an element of luck to them, with some positions being easy to defend and some downright atrocious for any mode, and the position itself being random and not changeable (can't move the hostage/container/bombs). Getting the short end of the stick is never fun.

    And mechanically it's not very fun either. Instead of deployables being placeable via their projected model like in many other games, R6S forces the operator to shuffle back and forth until they magically raise their hands into the 'can deploy' position. It's not realistic, it's deliberately crippled control. Of course, barbed wire, bear traps and whatnot can not be placed on stairs, no, sir. Only on flat surfaces with at least a meter of free space behind them (for the operative to stand when deploying). All the traps, even the mechanical ones, have IFF, e.g. the barbed wire doesn't slow down allies. MAGIC!

    When the game works, it feels good. Yet, most of the time it just feels like "Game1 and Game2 did this so much better" and makes me wish for far more freedom in choosing loadouts and doing things.    … Expand
  4. lilschreck
    Dec 20, 2015
    7
    -awful hit detection
    -awful lighting and blinding effects (your eyes should naturally adjust to lighting, you don't in this game at all to the point where you should just avoid engaging enemies in areas of different lighting)
    -barely any content. (people that complain about battlefront should play this game) good initial premise of what a tactical shooter should be, but failed to    -awful hit detection
    -awful lighting and blinding effects (your eyes should naturally adjust to lighting, you don't in this game at all to the point where you should just avoid engaging enemies in areas of different lighting)
    -barely any content. (people that complain about battlefront should play this game)

    good initial premise of what a tactical shooter should be, but failed to deliver on critical areas
    I'm a huge fan of tome clancy tactical shooting games, but this was just a disapointment    … Expand
  5. SenshudoTV
    Dec 2, 2015
    7
    Rainbow Six Siege offers a change of pace from your traditional run-and-gun shooters of today, bringing the real experience of teamwork to the table unlike any other game today. Players will be required to think more tactically about how they achieve victory rather just point and shoot. However, the £40 retail price is a little high given that it lacks the well-known Tom Clancy storyRainbow Six Siege offers a change of pace from your traditional run-and-gun shooters of today, bringing the real experience of teamwork to the table unlike any other game today. Players will be required to think more tactically about how they achieve victory rather just point and shoot. However, the £40 retail price is a little high given that it lacks the well-known Tom Clancy story driven experience that core fans enjoy.… Expand
  6. acidkill
    Dec 6, 2015
    7
    i'm a big rainbow six fan been waiting for this game a long time but have to say it not really what i was hoping terorist hunt is more a trukey shoot with enemys that just keep comming it more a fps shooter then a tactical game good thing is i got vegas for free a that's a much better game that this a big big shame !!!!!!!!!
  7. DemKin
    Aug 25, 2021
    7
    The game has strong points but I find myself not able to play for more than 20 hrs periods. The destructive environments and numerous characters with their own gimmicks make for a fresh competitive FPS experience, where there are many ways to defend a site.
    However my experience is tarnished mainly by the technical shortcomings, among other things. The lag is very high for a game of this    The game has strong points but I find myself not able to play for more than 20 hrs periods. The destructive environments and numerous characters with their own gimmicks make for a fresh competitive FPS experience, where there are many ways to defend a site.
    However my experience is tarnished mainly by the technical shortcomings, among other things. The lag is very high for a game of this genre, oftentimes you get shot from someone who isn't even appearing in your screen or just very briefly appearing, while on his he had turned the corner for a good half a second to a full second.
    So much visual confusion, little details everywhere, and 90 different angles from which the ennemy can defend or approach a room (breakable ceilings/floors/walls, furniture, corners, windows...), make for a very, very steep learning curve, aswell as the sprawling maps that even 50 hours of play won't allow you to know well a single one. Oftentimes the character models are barely visible against the background too.
    Learning curve made steeper by the fact the game is quick to catapult you with players who actually know it well. While you start playing with noobs like you, which is quite enjoyable, after you start getting a few frags, you'll rapidly end up matching up with seasonned players, after that it's mainly getting spawnkilled and killed from angles you didn't know existed.
    Last but not least, the community's toxicity is ever present. Very rarely a single game without insults, flaming, trolling, griefing, TKs. The game I hear has a cheating problem aswell, but I only saw one very obvious one who didn't care to hide it, accompanied by his pal who kept insulting everyone who was accusing him. Considering my level, I can't really tell someone who's cheating from a good player.

    So a game you should be playing with friends really. Should make the experience so much more enjoyable than mine, who couldn't get my friends to hop on it.    … Expand
  8. xKindred
    Feb 19, 2016
    7
    An entertaining & tactical shooter prioritizing the players freedom of choice, without the anxious complexity of more competitive FPS titles. Siege manages to cram as much variety as possible without becoming overwhelming to players new to this style of game. The lack of PC exclusive features leave much to desire due to its underwhelming lack of dedicated servers & small differences to theAn entertaining & tactical shooter prioritizing the players freedom of choice, without the anxious complexity of more competitive FPS titles. Siege manages to cram as much variety as possible without becoming overwhelming to players new to this style of game. The lack of PC exclusive features leave much to desire due to its underwhelming lack of dedicated servers & small differences to the console version. Given its triple-A release price and prestigious series history, Siege has a lot to live up to, but its inevitable repetition leaves more to be desired. Nevertheless, Siege is a laugh to play with friends & unlocking the many operators & accessories feels progressive as well as rewarding.… Expand
  9. jgr94
    Mar 26, 2016
    7
    Don't let the reviews fool you (This is just the classic AAA title bashing).
    The gameplay is so f**king addicting. Best fun I have had in a FPS in a long time!
  10. youlouz
    Jan 2, 2016
    7
    The game is pretty good
    PROS
    -Great graphics
    -Nice controls
    - Fun gameplay

    CONS
    -Extremely frustrating campaign
    -Multiplayer can be challenging .
  11. sscott0829tw
    Dec 1, 2015
    7
    A good FPS online game,the maps are really well designed,every maps offers lots of ways for players to go,enemy can come from all directions.It looks like a pro version of Counter Strike.Multiplayer and terrorist hunt are fun and challenging,the AI has improved a lot from the beta.And Ubisoft said that there will be a lot of free DLC.But the game really need a single player campaign,everyA good FPS online game,the maps are really well designed,every maps offers lots of ways for players to go,enemy can come from all directions.It looks like a pro version of Counter Strike.Multiplayer and terrorist hunt are fun and challenging,the AI has improved a lot from the beta.And Ubisoft said that there will be a lot of free DLC.But the game really need a single player campaign,every rainbow 6 has a campaign...And the server is pretty bad,ran into loading bugs or lagging problems sometimes.Love all the operators in the game,each of it is unique and have cook gadgets,make everyone in the team really have something to do.Best destrucible environment in gaming I have ever seen.In it's current state,this game is lack of content for sure,needs more mode,more maps and more weapons,.Hope that they can come up with new DLC soon.… Expand
  12. ULTRA_MARIO_10
    Aug 7, 2016
    7
    So... tom clancys rainbow six seige Is it good? Let's find out.

    Story- There's no campaign in the game Presentation- 6/10 Ok but nothing mind blowing. Graphics-5.4/10 The graphics are okay, even at ultra settings the graphics are nothing huge and amazing but still mediocre Sound/Music-7/10 The music is mediocre but I like the sound in this game. Options-7.1/10 There is    So... tom clancys rainbow six seige Is it good? Let's find out.

    Story-
    There's no campaign in the game

    Presentation- 6/10
    Ok but nothing mind blowing.

    Graphics-5.4/10
    The graphics are okay, even at ultra settings the graphics are nothing huge and amazing but still mediocre

    Sound/Music-7/10
    The music is mediocre but I like the sound in this game.

    Options-7.1/10
    There is a good amount of options in this game you could change up like the graphics and the monitor you want the game to run in.

    Online functionality-7.9/10
    It's actually pretty good, you can make your own game or join a casual game or a ranked game when you reach level 20.

    Gameplay- 8/10
    It's a pretty fun game with explosions and rappels but I don't like how there's not team deathmatch or capture the flag
    and no campaign but it is pretty fun if you're good at online FPS games.

    Lasting appeal-6/10
    Meh... It's not a game I would play most of the time

    Verdict- Adding up everything that this game has, I think i'm pretty fair at giving it a...

    7/10.(Good)    … Expand
  13. The_BlueRose
    Feb 6, 2017
    7
    Good strategic-shooter game.

    Graphically can be improved.

    The operators are original but some of them have useless gadgets.

    The game requieres lot of hours to know every spot and camera locations, wich makes it a noob-unfriendly game and frustrating new players.
  14. juliiouse
    Jan 2, 2017
    7
    Rainbow Six: Siege fits a missing hole in multiplayer FPS games of which I've been searching for quite some time: a hardcore, squad based close quarters experience. You may be thinking that Counterstrike offers this too, but the experiences are very different.

    Rainbow Six Siege provides a very interesting dynamic between the two teams: the defenders hold a position of extreme control    Rainbow Six: Siege fits a missing hole in multiplayer FPS games of which I've been searching for quite some time: a hardcore, squad based close quarters experience. You may be thinking that Counterstrike offers this too, but the experiences are very different.

    Rainbow Six Siege provides a very interesting dynamic between the two teams: the defenders hold a position of extreme control over the attackers, who spend their time slowly wresting control from the defenders, either through direct confrontation or taking their resources apart.

    The difference between the two teams is striking: the defenders have access to fixed position CCTV that offers a huge amount of visibility in a fixed-- and easily destroyed position-- whilst the attackers have access to drones, which offer mobile visibility but from the level of a small rodent, affording the attackers less direct information but the ability to see any part of the area. The defenders are given time to set traps, put up barricades and attempt to funnel the movements of the attackers into specific chokepoints, whilst the attackers are given flashbangs, explosives and longer range weapons to shoot into the buildings.

    This set up creates a lot of tension, as defenders feel like homeowners experiencing a break in whilst the attacking team feel like unwelcome invaders in a hostile world, which has helped to create one of the most intense multiplayer experiences I've had in a while.

    The slower, more methodical pace required by both sides and reliance on information and teamwork creates a solid experience, but one which requires a few friends and a teamspeak/discord server. Playing which a matchmade team just does not work as well, as many will be averse to using the microphone and so information is not distributed to the team fast enough.

    Graphically, the game is serviceable: weapons tear up scenery, explosions and smoke pop off all around you and lights reflect across the floor as you make your way through the match. This is great, but the graphics can sometimes feel a little flat, which can make distinguishing between the many different operators relatively difficult.

    The audio design is where the game comes into it's own. You will quickly find yourself relying on the various sounds heard throughout the level, from the zipping noise of a rappel to the heavy footed running of an enemy above you locating the objective. All of these instill a sense in more experience players and create some very tense moments: in a recent game I was sprinting toward a hostage when the floor below and wall to the side of me erupted into a hell of bullets as two enemies had picked up my footsteps.

    The destructible environments of the game are top-notch. Walls blow apart, barricades are destroyed and hastily rebuilt and bullets fly through soft surfaces, creating another level to the map design and engagements felt throughout.

    Though the game is not perfect due to difficulties playing when friends are not around and the graphics can make things less clear than they could be, I would still recommend picking this game up in any sale.    … Expand
  15. JazzTheMan
    Feb 5, 2016
    7
    The game has a good concept, a medium delivery, and a good core, but it doesn't meet most expectations. The game was better during the E3 Demo, hence when you buy the game, everything is more limited than shown in the gameplay demo. Long story short: Good Concept, and Medium Standard, but could've been a lot better than it's given potential. Medium wedge on the 60$ Value.
  16. crypticturtle
    Mar 8, 2016
    7
    A fun tactical game with an excellent attack-defense system. While some are not useful, each class has a unique play style, most notably being the difference between offense and defensive classes. I would score this game higher, however it is not worth the 50-60 dollar price tag. This being a multiplayer-only game (aside from some tutorial missions) along the likes of CSGO, I believe it isA fun tactical game with an excellent attack-defense system. While some are not useful, each class has a unique play style, most notably being the difference between offense and defensive classes. I would score this game higher, however it is not worth the 50-60 dollar price tag. This being a multiplayer-only game (aside from some tutorial missions) along the likes of CSGO, I believe it is worth the 20-30 US dollar range.… Expand
  17. GFGeclipse
    Oct 11, 2017
    7
    R6: Siege is Ubisoft's attempt to kill two birds with one stone by reviving a previously established IP and using a fast pass ticket into the competitive e-sports industry with one title. In doing so all they have established is that they can make games that are flawed by technical faults that heavily detract from an otherwise enjoyable experience.
    You assume the role as one of 33    R6: Siege is Ubisoft's attempt to kill two birds with one stone by reviving a previously established IP and using a fast pass ticket into the competitive e-sports industry with one title. In doing so all they have established is that they can make games that are flawed by technical faults that heavily detract from an otherwise enjoyable experience.
    You assume the role as one of 33 playable operators, each with a unique and distinguished special ability, and play alongside four other players in 5v5 multiplayer attack versus defend game modes. Round are respawn-free, meaning if you die, you're out until the next round.
    Multiplayer is where this game is significantly flawed, which on further inspection is a big concern considering that this game is a multiplayer game.
    A reporting functionality does exist, something that is a must have for every multiplayer game, but despite this, it never seems to actually do anything. This is partially due to the consistent influx of hackers that swarm multiplayer games throughout the year, and also down to the fact that users reporting other players don't receive any form of communication on what action was eventually taken on the reported player, if any was taken at all!
    The matchmaking system is inherently flawed, and new players can expect themselves to be paired up with other new players against a team full of people that should be competing for thousands of dollars in the competitive pro league.
    The game is also riddled with bugs and glitches; some of which are addressed, but most of which are described as 'identified by the development team' and no more. So much so that they even skipped a whole DLC to provide a 'season long' (3 months) period of updates exclusively aimed at fixing issues, which was aptly named 'Operation Health'. Many players (including myself) will tell you that although this season fixed many bugs, for every bug that was fixed, another 10+ were introduced.
    It is evident by all of these attempts that Ubisoft are trying to fix this game to a point where it would excel at being a great tactical multiplayer shooter, but seasoned game design veterans like themselves should know that simply trying is not enough to meet today's industry expectation.
    As with most Ubisoft games, they try to emphasize the highly accurate and realistic visual graphics. What actually happened at launch was a terrible mess of broken lighting in nearly every inch of your screen, and textures that simply didn't live up to the expectations that Ubisoft themselves set during their E3 demo.
    As time has gone on, they have got much better, and the next update promises to improve the overall graphical quality of the game, so I have no real basis to fault them on in the graphics department writing today in 2017. Had I been writing this review a year ago, we may have seen a different story being presented.
    Player progression is an aspect of R6: Siege that I often find being misinterpreted by reviewers who haven't explored the game far enough to understand how player progression actually works. Ubisoft offers two versions of the game, the starter edition, and the standard edition. This pricing model allows gamers who aren't completely sold on the game to purchase a cheaper version where they don't instantly start with a large collection of operators (classes) to play with. They can then choose to unlock these operators with in-game currency, which cannot be purchased with real life money. This is a great move by Ubisoft which allows all players, independent of financial capacity, to experience all of the different operators in the game.
    Gameplay mechanics are where Rainbow Six: Siege properly excels. Players can use RC drones with built in cameras to scope out areas of the map before engaging, and many operators have different traps and gadgets to apply a multitude of effects (both positive and negative) to players who happen to stumble across them, ranging from concussion mines to toxic smoke canisters. These mechanics provide a fun and unique playing experience with a map that is dynamically changing throughout the round, promoting players to think on their feet and adapt to the present situation. This plays well into the re-playability of the game; you are almost guaranteed to never have a match that plays out in a predictable scenario that you have experienced before.
    Options menus are where most PC games fall very short of the mark, but R6: Siege is an exception to this. The game features a highly extensive yet immensely intuitive settings screen, and good news for some gamers, the game features out-of-the-box ultrawide 21:9 aspect ratio support. The 'Ultra HD texture pack' that they offer, which is more than 20 gigabytes in size, doesn't seem to offer any form of improvement to the graphics unless you're using a fancy Dell 8K monitor, but heavily decreases the frame rate of the game, so unless you want to be the very best, you'll probably want to pass on that option.    … Expand
  18. Kvantaliani03
    Nov 20, 2021
    7
    rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
  19. Jokerlocco
    Jan 25, 2020
    7
    This analysis is in Spanish (my original language) and in English / Este análisis esta en español (mi idioma nativo) y en inglés con la ayuda del traductor de Google.

    [ENGLISH] Despite being from Ubisoft, I can assure you that this game is very good. If you are a person who likes to play competitively, I recommend it. It is a very realistic game, tactical and strategic, that is, a    This analysis is in Spanish (my original language) and in English / Este análisis esta en español (mi idioma nativo) y en inglés con la ayuda del traductor de Google.

    [ENGLISH]
    Despite being from Ubisoft, I can assure you that this game is very good. If you are a person who likes to play competitively, I recommend it.
    It is a very realistic game, tactical and strategic, that is, a difficult game.
    If you really want to be a professional in this game, it will take you many hours. I, for example, to stop being useless, I had to play 24 hours. But with patience and dedication, you can fall in love with this great title.
    The tension that gives you when playing, is great, and the feeling when winning a round, indescribable.
    Each character has a different ability and that makes it more entertaining. For example, we have one of the Russians, Fuze, who throws numerous grenades into a room through a wall or window. It is very annoying, but for this we have in the opposite team, Jager, which can place in the room, an artifact that eliminates the bombs that enter the room, that is, Fuze is ****
    If you want to unlock new characters without using real money, I must announce that it is very expensive, and needs MANY hours of play.

    In short, I recommend your purchase if you are a patient player and veteran / professional in the shooter.

    PS: To play it I recommend that you have good helmets and good Internet. Another important point to comment, is that I do not recommend buying the "starter edition" version (€ 15), it's not worth it. Buy the normal edition.

    [ESPAÑOL]
    A pesar de ser de Ubisoft, puedo asegurar que este juego es muy bueno. Si eres una persona que le gusta jugar competitivamente, te lo recomiendo. Es un juego muy realista, táctico y estratégico, es decir, un juego difícil.
    Si realmente quieres ser un profesional en este juego, te llevara muchas horas. Yo, por ejemplo, para dejar de ser un inútil, he tenido que jugar 24 horas. Pero con paciencia y dedicación, puedes enamorarte de este grandísimo título.
    La tensión que te otorga al jugar, es magnífica, y la sensación a la hora de ganar una ronda, indescriptible.
    Cada personaje tiene una habilidad distinta y eso lo hace más entretenido. Por ejemplo, tenemos a uno de los rusos, Fuze, el cual lanza numerosas granadas en el interior de una habitación a través de una pared o ventana. Es muy molesto, pero para ello tenemos en el equipo opuesto, a Jager, el cual puede colocar en la habitación, un artefacto que elimina las bombas que entren en la sala, es decir, fastidiaremos a Fuze.
    Si quieres desbloquear a nuevos personajes sin utilizar dinero real, debo advertirte que es muy costoso, y necesitaras MUCHAS horas de juego.

    En fin, recomiendo su compra si eres un jugador paciente y veterano/profesional en los shooter.

    PD: Para jugarlo recomiendo que tengáis unos buenos cascos y buen Internet. Otro punto importante a comentar, es que no recomiendo comprar la versión "starter edition" (15€), no merece la pena. Comprad la edición normal.    … Expand
  20. moonlaba
    Jan 17, 2022
    7
    누군가에게는 레인보우식스 프랜차이즈의 몰락일 수도 있지만 누군가에게는 산소호흡기 역활일 수도 있다는 점. 대테러 컨셉을 가진 하드코어FPS중에 손꼽히게 흥하고 있다는건 분명히 좋은 게임이라는 의미.
  21. effectcre
    Nov 13, 2020
    7
    Fantastic system, charming character, funny map design, but too many hacks and glitching.
  22. ZubriQ
    Mar 15, 2020
    7
    It's a solid 7. This game could have been better if not those latencies in the game... If you has ping 70 then guys literally dwell in the future and you get killed by a void from dark world of oblivion. Or the situation that happened to me. I was not visible and the enemy just aimed at this point where I was supposed to be. And before going to another spot, he merely, blithely,It's a solid 7. This game could have been better if not those latencies in the game... If you has ping 70 then guys literally dwell in the future and you get killed by a void from dark world of oblivion. Or the situation that happened to me. I was not visible and the enemy just aimed at this point where I was supposed to be. And before going to another spot, he merely, blithely, half-heartedly shot only once to where my body wasn't visible. Thus, my skull was torn to shreds, and I died with sardonic emotions. Fortunately, the price does not bite too much.… Expand
  23. gorillareviews
    Sep 13, 2020
    7
    Oooh Ah ah game good, nice for smart ape like me OOohhh ahh. 7 because no ape and no banaan
  24. Killiomadness
    Aug 7, 2020
    7
    I honestly have mix emotions with this game it’s fun but also not fun it’s unbalanced and some of the event is garbage good ideas just garbage to be fair I love this game but also hate this game
  25. xFlyaway02
    Nov 15, 2020
    7
    All in all it's a good Game BUT, all the Head glitching makes me wanna kill Ubisoft
  26. RockerKR
    Nov 17, 2020
    7
    Good Game lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
  27. f0v3r
    Dec 29, 2020
    7
    I'm writing this review in December of 2020 and it's honestly sad that the game is getting worse and worse every update. After 4 years of playing this game pretty much every day, I just have no interest in playing this game anymore. It's obviously not what was promised on the trailers but who cares at this point? The game was a success because of the esports scene and unique gameplay butI'm writing this review in December of 2020 and it's honestly sad that the game is getting worse and worse every update. After 4 years of playing this game pretty much every day, I just have no interest in playing this game anymore. It's obviously not what was promised on the trailers but who cares at this point? The game was a success because of the esports scene and unique gameplay but now everything has gone to sh*t.… Expand
  28. GreenPufferFish
    Aug 20, 2021
    7
    Fun game like csgo buy kinda needs a team deathmatch mode.More weapons and slightly pay to win but over all fun
  29. Hot_Smurf
    Apr 25, 2021
    7
    Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege is a staple of esports FPS titles. Nerve-rackingly complex because of how much the map can change every round. I sunk more than 900 hours into R6 and it is still enjoyable. However, Ubisoft has a long history of making the game unplayable for long periods of time, for example when the add Ela. If you don't play with friends, then the game gets boringTom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege is a staple of esports FPS titles. Nerve-rackingly complex because of how much the map can change every round. I sunk more than 900 hours into R6 and it is still enjoyable. However, Ubisoft has a long history of making the game unplayable for long periods of time, for example when the add Ela. If you don't play with friends, then the game gets boring extremely quickly. A welcome change of pace from games like Call of Duty.

    7/10    … Expand
  30. 1pengu
    May 3, 2021
    7
    4k hours with this games. I hate it, server issues, toxic players, stupid newbie buy account and go play ranked.
prev
Page:

Awards & Rankings

82
#82 Best PC Game of 2015
6
#6 Most Discussed PC Game of 2015
16
#16 Most Shared PC Game of 2015

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
79

Generally favorable reviews - based on 37 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 29 out of 37
  2. Mixed: 8 out of 37
  3. Negative: 0 out of 37
  1. Pelit (Finland)
    Mar 3, 2016
    86
    An excellent and innovative breath of fresh air. The more I play, the more I like. I hope this is new role model for shooters to come. [Jan 2016]
  2. CD-Action
    Feb 4, 2016
    70
    Siege’s multiplayer mode with its hectic pace and unpredictability seems to have a huge e-sport potential but with random teammates is often unplayable. [01/2016, p.52]
  3. Game World Navigator Magazine
    Jan 20, 2016
    80
    Unfortunately, there aren’t that many maps available, but each one of them has lots of details and alternate routes, like basements and balconies. Even the airplane is much more complex than the archetypical “long tube with seats.” [Issue#205, p.48]
See all critic reviews »