Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege

 PC
User Score
7.0

Mixed or average reviews- based on 1890 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1,197 out of 1890
  2. Mixed: 300 out of 1890
  3. Negative: 393 out of 1890
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Psychocist
    Jun 11, 2016
    4
    I hardly ever write reviews, but felt compelled to after [thankfully] buying this game for only £12 on Steam. The destruction is great, and I'm sure it is a decent tactical shooter, but the gun play itself leaves a lot to be desired.

    Do not buy this expecting a successor to Vegas-style gameplay. There isn't much to do beyond the siege game type. Terrorist hunt is shockingly bad, almost    I hardly ever write reviews, but felt compelled to after [thankfully] buying this game for only £12 on Steam. The destruction is great, and I'm sure it is a decent tactical shooter, but the gun play itself leaves a lot to be desired.

    Do not buy this expecting a successor to Vegas-style gameplay. There isn't much to do beyond the siege game type. Terrorist hunt is shockingly bad, almost every entrance is blocked and you have to breach - no opening doors here.

    If you want something a littler spicier than camping inside small rooms, you're out of luck. No deathmatch, no team deathmatch, once you're dead in siege, you're dead and left waiting. No server browser, crappy matchmaking.

    I find the lack of variety in gameplay surprising considering how easy it would be to throw a few people on a map and let them shoot it out. If you're expecting ANYTHING like the previous instalments, you will be sorely disappointed.    … Expand
  2. Ruegrong
    Dec 17, 2015
    4
    Boosters, skins, all for microtransactions, i dont hate the game, it just shouldn't be rainbow six. The super fast gameplay is much like COD and on top of that there is no campaign. This game is far from worth $60
  3. carnivorCactae
    Mar 21, 2021
    4
    There is so much wrong with this game.
    Where do I even start?
    Basically it has nothing to do with tactics and especially nothing with Rainbow Six anymore. - why are there no doors anywhere? No building has doors?! - no cool "slowly open door and peek" with your mousewheel anymore. A feature even the 18 (!) year old game Rainbow Six did have! - the "Operators" started out semi and    There is so much wrong with this game.
    Where do I even start?

    Basically it has nothing to do with tactics and especially nothing with Rainbow Six anymore.

    - why are there no doors anywhere? No building has doors?!
    - no cool "slowly open door and peek" with your mousewheel anymore. A feature even the 18 (!) year old game Rainbow Six did have!
    - the "Operators" started out semi and pseudo-realistic but turned into a total Joke after only a year.
    -> now you have Characters that are like a mix of Call of Duty and Overwatch. Basically "Heroes" in a "tactical" Setting
    - Gampelay and rounds are essentially: Rushing in like a stressed and panicked speedrunner into buildings, breaching like crazy and shooting with guns that all have a weird little sway around the crosshair.

    Because anything slow and methodical wouldn't work for people with ADHS and the need to entertain huge E-sport-crowds, I guess?

    - the only time where you have at least a littlebit of methodical and tactical approach, is when you play with friends on "Training Grounds" (the former Terrorist Hunt"),
    but its nothing compared to SWAT 5 or the old Rainbow Six 3.
    -> All the AI-Enemies look the same,
    -> you can't even take bots as team-mates with you (you know, a feature even the 18 ! year old Rainbow Games had!)
    -> Ubi$oft nerfed the amount of "Renown" to oblivion (currency you need to unlock new characters (lol)) you get through single-player and coop-missions, so unlocking new operators takes horrendous amounts of time
    (~300 hours or you can spend real cash and that'll be over a hundred bucks. Just take a look at the currency-packs and the tiny amount of renown you earn ingame and do the math! There is a reason Ubi$oft keeps the Season-passes, ingame-currency and different editions as not selfexplanatory as possible!)
    -> Your weapons are less deadly and sometimes you'll have to shoot multiple rounds into enemies
    -> You can't make enemies give up / handcuff them
    -> downed AI-enemies will just die. They can't shoot at you or be secured or anything of this "boring tactical SWAT-stuff"

    So a LOT of the tention of true tactical shooters is gone.

    On the TECHNICAL side of things: Game cloggs 45 (!) gb on the hdd with only 14 maps (and no real bot-support and smaller mapsize in general!) compared to the 15 maps of RS 3 + 6 MP maps and additional fanmade maps = 21 maps! and runs worse with every update.

    Ubisoft decided to create a MOBA-Call-of-Duty-Overwatch mix for Twitch-streamers and the "E-Sports"-business, with zero intention to support the core-mechanic of tactical-shooters anymore.
    Their last "Playbook-Story-Trailer" made this pretty obvious.    … Expand
  4. Radioactivebuny
    Feb 7, 2016
    4
    Something about the way the game handles from a technical standpoint makes playing it almost physically painful. That, of course, pales in comparison to the emotional pain of knowing that I'll never get an experience like the original Rainbow Six games, or even the Vegas games back. The fact that Ghost Recon appears to be next after Future Soldier only makes this feeling worse.

    It    Something about the way the game handles from a technical standpoint makes playing it almost physically painful. That, of course, pales in comparison to the emotional pain of knowing that I'll never get an experience like the original Rainbow Six games, or even the Vegas games back. The fact that Ghost Recon appears to be next after Future Soldier only makes this feeling worse.

    It makes me sad to play it, and though I got it for $40, I regret every last penny of that purchase and wish I'd bought Squad instead.    … Expand
  5. askeptic
    Dec 10, 2015
    4
    The game takes a good idea, and completely wrecks it. Almost like Ubisoft didn't even try, or was rushed. It is a great concept, but the coding of the game falls flat on its face when trying to deliver the experience. Every game begins with a match of RC Pro AM remote control car derby if your offense, or run around doing the same old BS if your defense. The netcode is from the 90's andThe game takes a good idea, and completely wrecks it. Almost like Ubisoft didn't even try, or was rushed. It is a great concept, but the coding of the game falls flat on its face when trying to deliver the experience. Every game begins with a match of RC Pro AM remote control car derby if your offense, or run around doing the same old BS if your defense. The netcode is from the 90's and bullets don't always register a hit, which is a HUGE issue considering that most of the time it is 1 shot 1 kill. Graphics are pretty heavily outdated, and in game actions are painfully ugly. Why can one side pick up barbwire, but the other can't? Who smashes barb wire with the butt of a gun? Who disarms a bomb with a butt of a gun? All these things make the game feel incomplete, rushed, and just pretty darn fake which takes you out of the immersion that it was designed to be. Lastly, content to price is far far FAR off! Wait until after Christmas, then pick it up for $19.99. But even then be careful, people may of stopped playing making matches almost impossible to find.... If they decide to even fix their online servers which go down constantly without any notice.… Expand
  6. Beatlejuice
    Dec 7, 2015
    4
    The game can be fun but there is a lot to be said for this game. It has moments of tense action but it feels like a game much cheaper than the 60 dollar price tag. No campaign, no real single player, the content is quite limited as well as the game modes. It's all variations on attack and defend. The variety of the original R6 titles are missing. The purely 1 life TDM in symmetrical mapsThe game can be fun but there is a lot to be said for this game. It has moments of tense action but it feels like a game much cheaper than the 60 dollar price tag. No campaign, no real single player, the content is quite limited as well as the game modes. It's all variations on attack and defend. The variety of the original R6 titles are missing. The purely 1 life TDM in symmetrical maps are gone. There is so much missing.

    The realism is there where 1 or 2 shots will kill but the netcode and/or hit detection is fuzzy as hell. Watching replays it's infuriating when even the replay shows the bullet "hits" not actually hitting you.

    The graphics are mediocre and are below what AAA titles provide these days.

    All and all the game would be great at about half the price it is currently. The game could be heading towards pre-mature obscurity with a dwindling playerbase. Hopefully they fix the price so more players can come in.    … Expand
  7. Candy4breakfast
    Jan 3, 2016
    4
    Shooda,Wooda,Cooda. I video game is only as good as its weakest link. In This case it has nothing to do with the great gameplay this game offers but instead its poor netcode and server stability.

    What good is an online only game if you can't connect to a server.
  8. Glitshy
    Mar 26, 2016
    4
    It just isn't worth it. It's not worth 60 bucks. It's not worth playing alone. And it's not worth the name Rainbow Six, as it doesn't have a campaign, which made the series what it is. Every Rainbow Six had one, but hey threw it out of the window as soon as Tom Clancy couldn't argue about it, and it even costs much less money for Ubisoft. Obviously no reason to make it cost less than 60It just isn't worth it. It's not worth 60 bucks. It's not worth playing alone. And it's not worth the name Rainbow Six, as it doesn't have a campaign, which made the series what it is. Every Rainbow Six had one, but hey threw it out of the window as soon as Tom Clancy couldn't argue about it, and it even costs much less money for Ubisoft. Obviously no reason to make it cost less than 60 bucks. And they even could use his name. $$$… Expand
  9. JayDee
    Dec 4, 2015
    4
    The game itself is pretty good (9/10), but since it is based on multiplayer only, the horrible netcode makes the game a pain in the ass. Shooting an enemy to the head five times, seeing blood and then the guy turns areound, shoots back and kills you? That's routine. Just like other guys shooting air while they can't even see you, because you are hidden behind a wall (impenetrable) afterThe game itself is pretty good (9/10), but since it is based on multiplayer only, the horrible netcode makes the game a pain in the ass. Shooting an enemy to the head five times, seeing blood and then the guy turns areound, shoots back and kills you? That's routine. Just like other guys shooting air while they can't even see you, because you are hidden behind a wall (impenetrable) after you peaked and suddenly you are dead from their fire. Trying to hit someone with single shots while they are running is also a lottery. Either you are lucky and hit the spot where the game things the guys is, or the guy just runs away (while you clearly hit him in the back with your sniper rifle). That's the biggest problem the game has. There is also problem with clipping. When you lie down near a wall, quite often there is an enemy on the other side who can see your legs or head clipping through the wall. The worst thing about this is that they can just kill you while you can't do anything about it. I am not going to mention some smaller problems, because they are not important.… Expand
  10. lshrsyson
    Aug 18, 2023
    4
    This game was good... when it first came out but now its nothing but an embarrasment of its former self.
    The fact they got rid of the night time maps, reworked good maps into subpar maps. They keep reworking operators that make them worse then what they were.
    Not to mention with the new operators the weapons they have are recycled. Instead of adding new weapons in. Also while on the weapon    This game was good... when it first came out but now its nothing but an embarrasment of its former self.
    The fact they got rid of the night time maps, reworked good maps into subpar maps. They keep reworking operators that make them worse then what they were.
    Not to mention with the new operators the weapons they have are recycled. Instead of adding new weapons in. Also while on the weapon discussion they could let the operators from that particular country have a choice of both of the attackers and defenders weapons. So for example mute should have the choice of the sa80 along with his mp5k etc.
    Oh also the fact they changed from real factions to made up ones. So you won't see fbi, sas etc with any of the new operators.
    Not to mention the over the top skins you can get for the operators now.
    Tom clancy must be rolling in his grave.    … Expand
  11. FallonPhoenix
    Dec 1, 2015
    4
    There simply is not enough game here to warrant the price. As a huge fan of both rainbow six vegas games ((And all their respective DLC content)), I feel extremely disappointed. This game consists of 11 maps in its entirety. Their content roadmap states they will be adding 4 more over the next year. So sometime by Christmas Next year, there will be 15 Maps. ((MAYBE.))

    It is no    There simply is not enough game here to warrant the price. As a huge fan of both rainbow six vegas games ((And all their respective DLC content)), I feel extremely disappointed. This game consists of 11 maps in its entirety. Their content roadmap states they will be adding 4 more over the next year. So sometime by Christmas Next year, there will be 15 Maps. ((MAYBE.))

    It is no coincidence that the ability to select game modes is hidden under different UI than any other FPS would ever have utilized. The Developers are clearly trying to stretch what little content they have as far as possible. This is shameful.

    What game is there is certainly nice. The guns are nothing particularly amazing, but passable. The explosives are enough to illicit some tactical play. Nothing here hasn't been done before, better, Elsewhere. For a game with so little, Ubisoft then has the nerve to put in a cash shop, for boosters and skins. In case you weren't getting all of the limited content fast enough, and so they can churn out more recycled garbage.

    The AI feels no different than it did in Rainbow Six Vegas 2.

    Rainbow Six Vegas 2 Released in 2008 with:
    12 maps, 4 DLC maps
    A Full Campaign.
    Extensive character Customization

    The Maps themselves do not feel NEARLY as exciting as those in Vegas 2. We were going through neon sign graveyards, Bright, loud casinos, of various makes, a whole construction zone for CQB training, Oil refineries, Trainyards....I had the most fun on a shooter I'd had up until that point. I was hoping to recover some of that, but the wind is right out of my sales.

    In Closing, This game is a major disappointment to any Vegas fan who expected more.    … Expand
  12. jesusjones1024
    Dec 26, 2015
    4
    This game has low expectations for itself and fails to reach even those.

    Pro: Tactical Teamwork Con: Everything else. Is this what we expect for $60? It functions like Insurgency's autistic cousin. It tries to cover up it's horrible graphics with the most extreme case of Motion Blur I've ever seen. The AI will shoot you through walls with 100% accuracy (then instantly troll you    This game has low expectations for itself and fails to reach even those.

    Pro: Tactical Teamwork

    Con: Everything else.

    Is this what we expect for $60? It functions like Insurgency's autistic cousin. It tries to cover up it's horrible graphics with the most extreme case of Motion Blur I've ever seen. The AI will shoot you through walls with 100% accuracy (then instantly troll you with a killcam). Guns have no recoil/uniqueness. You can only destroy objects/walls marked as destructable (not some Red Faction contender as lauded). Servers plainly don't work. No single player. 40% of the unique content requires microtransactions AT LAUNCH, feels like Game of War. R6 bucks my a $$.

    Multiplayer had the potential to be a fun $20 game on it's own, but it's lack of competition modes other than Attack/Defend make it absurdly over priced.

    A total bust. Thanks for the refund Steam.    … Expand
  13. eXcels
    Mar 21, 2016
    4
    The game itself trying to attempt a really good FPS online game. But it fails in a lot of points:
    - laggy server
    - bugs ( like drone is falling through the ground, not gaining points for victory or loss ) are just normal (after the third month of release date!) - the enemy can see you but you can't see the enemy. I was killed several times by invisible hostile players. The kill-cam    The game itself trying to attempt a really good FPS online game. But it fails in a lot of points:
    - laggy server
    - bugs ( like drone is falling through the ground, not gaining points for victory or loss ) are just normal (after the third month of release date!)
    - the enemy can see you but you can't see the enemy. I was killed several times by invisible hostile
    players. The kill-cam shows me that the enemy allegedly was standing in front of me.
    -

    It isn't worth 60$ not even the half    … Expand
  14. Jonnif1
    Jan 28, 2018
    4
    Average
    Might be one of the best games , but under Ubisoft they ruined it
    First of all in the beginning the game was so cool and realistic now it seems a cartoon game more likely Overwatch than hunting Terrorists As every game of Ubisoft you must have a premade team to play if you don't have premade team you have trouble since the enemy team might be premade team even in Casual which    Average
    Might be one of the best games , but under Ubisoft they ruined it
    First of all in the beginning the game was so cool and realistic now it seems a cartoon game
    more likely Overwatch than hunting Terrorists
    As every game of Ubisoft you must have a premade team to play
    if you don't have premade team you have trouble since the enemy team
    might be premade team even in Casual which is not fair for low levels players
    and that s why people quit , but I don't wonder since is an Ubisoft game
    and I can't expect the best , in the last years I am very negative towards Ubisoft .    … Expand
  15. turitz
    Nov 19, 2019
    4
    Rainbow six siege is a Rollercoaster of Emotions. The Game is good, makes fun, has a lot of well implemented mechanics, but the Game still has its flaws that just ruin everything at least for me.

    Pros The overall Gameplay expirience is rly good Cons The hitboxes feel wanky some times, not sure if its the server that fails. The Balancing Team could be faster sometimes, There    Rainbow six siege is a Rollercoaster of Emotions. The Game is good, makes fun, has a lot of well implemented mechanics, but the Game still has its flaws that just ruin everything at least for me.

    Pros
    The overall Gameplay expirience is rly good

    Cons
    The hitboxes feel wanky some times, not sure if its the server that fails.

    The Balancing Team could be faster sometimes, There times when a Operator gets banned every Match and they need like 3 Months to do a little nerf that doesn't change anything.

    The Matchmaking and Ranked Systems are garbage and thats also why I quit the Game, there times when the Game gives us Platin enemies when we are all just Silver or lower. And a Friemd of mine who is way better than me has the same Ranked cause Rainbows Ranking System is just bad

    The Maps are also an Interesting subject, Rainbow has a lot of Maps but most of them are just trash, there are just a Handfull of Maps that are well made, but with the huge load of bad Maps u get to play around 3 of 10 Matches with a good Map    … Expand
  16. hekpuctaast
    Mar 31, 2020
    4
    Basically in this game strongly decides Donat, my PC still pulls badly, in general I will be desired by his players.
  17. CleanZodiac
    Oct 12, 2020
    4
    The game mostly is not fun. First is that there's too many toxic people and reporting doesn't do anything, if someone leaves you can't also report them, the vote kick is also super rigged since if you find a toxic 4 stack you basically become their slaves because the vote kick system basically gets rid of the minority since 4 people have to vote to kick you, making solo queuing not funThe game mostly is not fun. First is that there's too many toxic people and reporting doesn't do anything, if someone leaves you can't also report them, the vote kick is also super rigged since if you find a toxic 4 stack you basically become their slaves because the vote kick system basically gets rid of the minority since 4 people have to vote to kick you, making solo queuing not fun sometimes. The game takes way too much time to load for everyone. I understand its a part of the game and I'm not saying to remove the ability to do it but spawn peaking is annoying to deal with and its super annoying to deal with defenders who jump off a second floor or they just exit the building and kill you with almost no risk since there's a 3 second countdown for the spawn peeker to only get spotted, the countdown can be reset if you go inside making it very easy to abuse the system. There are ways to deal with it, like droning certain areas, using long ranged operators like Glaz and Kali, but it just makes the game unfun having to constantly watching every peekable area so my team doesn't get killed. Sometimes the bullet don't register so headshots are kind of wonky, inconsistent sometimes and the game has several bugs but Ubisoft just wants to add more operator into a game with enough diversity for money, instead of actually fixing the terrible game.… Expand
  18. LukaMagic77
    Nov 14, 2021
    4
    If Ubisoft's studios release multiplayer games in the future, it's safe to assume that those games will have a short lifespan. The game is run by an incompetent producer who reflects their taste in the game and can't adjust the balance properly. Therefore, it is only natural that the games made by Ubisoft-affiliated studios have a short lifespan.
  19. armiaM
    Nov 10, 2022
    4
    just cheaters and campers
    just suck community
    just teamkill
    no more content
  20. Destroyeron
    Dec 15, 2015
    3
    Average game. Unfortunately it is marred by being totally unresponsive. You won't see the people that kill you until you see their kill cam. Do not buy.
  21. F25Xanatos
    Dec 6, 2015
    3
    I fail to understand why Ubisoft took the direction it did. I thought during the Alpha that it was going to become something more. Instead, it seems to follow the direction most FPS out there are going and that is short term investment. Why did games for the PC support 8 player COOP in the past, but not today? I wished they had used the Unreal Engine 4. PC games are like 2nd classI fail to understand why Ubisoft took the direction it did. I thought during the Alpha that it was going to become something more. Instead, it seems to follow the direction most FPS out there are going and that is short term investment. Why did games for the PC support 8 player COOP in the past, but not today? I wished they had used the Unreal Engine 4. PC games are like 2nd class citizens now. We get ports, and everyone knows how well Ubisoft makes them. Look at Hawx.

    I'm not spending 60 dollars on a game with such limited content, no dedicated servers, and a MP only focus. It's pure laziness on the developers side, and like Activision it is a stab at the PC community to force us to play the way they want us to play. In the words Jay Wilson, "You are having fun incorrectly."

    I've waited over a decade for a true sequel to the original R6 series. Takedown: Red Saber could have been that had it not played like abandonware from day one.

    If Ubisoft really cared about the Tom Clancy series they would have taken a look at GroundBranch.    … Expand
  22. jokerdeus
    Jan 26, 2016
    3
    Rainbow six : Siege is an expensive multiplayer game with a very, very, very, very bad matchmaking system and netcode for the servers. The game is fundamentally good but you won't be able to enjoy properly because of its HUGE matchmaking issues and server issues. It has been released since several months now, and Ubisoft doesn't change anything, that means that they won't ever changeRainbow six : Siege is an expensive multiplayer game with a very, very, very, very bad matchmaking system and netcode for the servers. The game is fundamentally good but you won't be able to enjoy properly because of its HUGE matchmaking issues and server issues. It has been released since several months now, and Ubisoft doesn't change anything, that means that they won't ever change anything about it. RIP rainbow six siege, nice try.… Expand
  23. Gruni
    Dec 30, 2015
    3
    In theory, this game is finally a new approach to online gaming. However, the sad truth is that Ubisoft simply can't satisfy online gamers due to a **** netcode, a bad foundation for a multiplayer game and a truly **** up price policy.

    This game should've been either a free2play title or a 20-25€/$ download title, not a full fledged 60€/$ full-price game with 29€/$ season pass attached    In theory, this game is finally a new approach to online gaming. However, the sad truth is that Ubisoft simply can't satisfy online gamers due to a **** netcode, a bad foundation for a multiplayer game and a truly **** up price policy.

    This game should've been either a free2play title or a 20-25€/$ download title, not a full fledged 60€/$ full-price game with 29€/$ season pass attached to it.

    The matchmaking simply does not work. There is no server browser. There are 10 maps (that play exactly the same whether you play at day or night, since the core of the gameplay is focused on the INSIDE of the buildings) - 20 characters to chose from, that can't go through any progress, as there simply is no progression ingame. That's it. Roughly 3 modifications that are basically all the same and once you have unlocked everything (took me 20 hours for all modifications + all operators) then you're done with the game basically.    … Expand
  24. Fallor
    Dec 7, 2015
    3
    You can buy this. If price is about 20-25 euro. If you have friends(a team of 3 at least) - you can buy this for 35. If you love pain - you can buy it for full price and enjoy **** connection, matchmaking, lags, unsynchronized players (just like Battlefield, only worse!). And you can buy season pass for Windows hanging bugs (prepare your restart button). Tough it can be funny sometimes.You can buy this. If price is about 20-25 euro. If you have friends(a team of 3 at least) - you can buy this for 35. If you love pain - you can buy it for full price and enjoy **** connection, matchmaking, lags, unsynchronized players (just like Battlefield, only worse!). And you can buy season pass for Windows hanging bugs (prepare your restart button). Tough it can be funny sometimes. If you are not playing with a team of imbecile randoms, who don't do ****… Expand
  25. fevid
    Oct 25, 2016
    3
    Great Gameplay, Aweful Bugs, I Dont Want to Say What Bugs are Cause they aint few!
    But They Are Super annoying and piss me off, Most of The Times its Unplayable cause of Bugs!
    sometimes i cant aim, im system is glitchy and i got to restart the game and hope it fixed! Hate Ubisoft and all Its Games, Dont Buy anything from Ubisoft!!!!! Pity that i paid them to get this crap game specialy    Great Gameplay, Aweful Bugs, I Dont Want to Say What Bugs are Cause they aint few!
    But They Are Super annoying and piss me off, Most of The Times its Unplayable cause of Bugs!
    sometimes i cant aim, im system is glitchy and i got to restart the game and hope it fixed!
    Hate Ubisoft and all Its Games, Dont Buy anything from Ubisoft!!!!!
    Pity that i paid them to get this crap game specialy that i bought GOLD!    … Expand
  26. bagolykiraly
    Jan 4, 2017
    3
    Well where should i start?Hmm maybe with the netcode because its buggy as hell.Or with the fact that the servers are unstable and the game is annoying to play with.Lets talk about the graphics well its medicore at best but dont add anything to the games appeal.The community is toxic and plagged with hackers.Or with the balance of the game.The character design and their abilities are reallyWell where should i start?Hmm maybe with the netcode because its buggy as hell.Or with the fact that the servers are unstable and the game is annoying to play with.Lets talk about the graphics well its medicore at best but dont add anything to the games appeal.The community is toxic and plagged with hackers.Or with the balance of the game.The character design and their abilities are really cool and awsome but in reality some are overpowered and some are usless or just weak in general.Im not a big fan of "realistic" fps games but i played with arma and other fps games that required a lot of skill to play(im not saying that im a pro at fps videogames).In this game you dont need that much skill but a **** ton of luck because sometimes your bullets kill people instantly but usually they wonder off in to the other side of the room where is no enemy to be found and there is so many "spots" on the map where you get insta killed and you dont have a chance to counter.The maps are horrible and boring after a couple of rounds.Overall i dont know what ubisoft wanted with this game they tried to make a hardcore reallistic fps game but they failed miserably with mechanics which are for the call of duty type gamers.I cant recommend this game at all. (sorry for bad english not a native speaker)… Expand
  27. Patrickyayo
    Mar 14, 2017
    3
    HUGE disappointment if you were looking for something similar to any of the games in this franchise, It's okay if you want something extremely repetitive and lacking any depth or strategy.

    This should've been RS Patriots.
  28. ImperialnySPQR
    Dec 5, 2018
    3
    A week ago I would certainly gave this game 9/10 to 10/10 I have over 500 hours on multiplayer but sadly the game devs are doing nothing to repair tons of bugs that are showing after each update, and after only few games now I saw a lot of new bugs, servers instability, plus new operators are directly how you shouldn't make multiplayer characters
  29. 13sins
    Mar 29, 2019
    3
    (take into consideration that i have played this game since it came out and i have over 3000 hours of game play)
    -graphics are good ( even better with the texture pack)
    -the idea is good but the execution is not as good -the mechanics are solid ( with the exception of some bugs) but the reason that i gave this game such a bad score is because despite its good qualities it keeps getting    (take into consideration that i have played this game since it came out and i have over 3000 hours of game play)
    -graphics are good ( even better with the texture pack)
    -the idea is good but the execution is not as good
    -the mechanics are solid ( with the exception of some bugs)
    but the reason that i gave this game such a bad score is because despite its good qualities it keeps getting worst with each update.
    hackers are found in 3 matches out of 10 ( the difference of being able to reach diamond and staying plat 2 in rank)
    hitboxes are just broken and there are so many exploits (crouch spam,lean spam,sliding, glitches)
    and they are not doing anything about it, and every time they did something about it, it just made things even worst.
    i gave it a lot of chances to redeem it self but i cant recommend this game as its current stage.    … Expand
  30. markdude701
    Apr 11, 2020
    3
    The gameplay is fair and entertaining for about an hour or two.
    I bought this game for $60 when it was released years ago. A few years, it's a lot worse of a game. The microtransations are the biggest turn off for me. 1/3 of the game is locked behind a pay wall or requires 200+ hours of game time to "purchase". You earn a currency each round game, which is close to 1% of what is required    The gameplay is fair and entertaining for about an hour or two.
    I bought this game for $60 when it was released years ago. A few years, it's a lot worse of a game. The microtransations are the biggest turn off for me. 1/3 of the game is locked behind a pay wall or requires 200+ hours of game time to "purchase". You earn a currency each round game, which is close to 1% of what is required to unlock a new character without any form of customization without paying. Stay away from this money pit.    … Expand
prev
Page:

Awards & Rankings

82
#82 Best PC Game of 2015
6
#6 Most Discussed PC Game of 2015
16
#16 Most Shared PC Game of 2015

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
79

Generally favorable reviews - based on 37 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 29 out of 37
  2. Mixed: 8 out of 37
  3. Negative: 0 out of 37
  1. Pelit (Finland)
    Mar 3, 2016
    86
    An excellent and innovative breath of fresh air. The more I play, the more I like. I hope this is new role model for shooters to come. [Jan 2016]
  2. CD-Action
    Feb 4, 2016
    70
    Siege’s multiplayer mode with its hectic pace and unpredictability seems to have a huge e-sport potential but with random teammates is often unplayable. [01/2016, p.52]
  3. Game World Navigator Magazine
    Jan 20, 2016
    80
    Unfortunately, there aren’t that many maps available, but each one of them has lots of details and alternate routes, like basements and balconies. Even the airplane is much more complex than the archetypical “long tube with seats.” [Issue#205, p.48]
See all critic reviews »