User Score
7.0

Mixed or average reviews- based on 1890 Ratings

User score distribution:
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. Jun 11, 2016
    4
    I hardly ever write reviews, but felt compelled to after [thankfully] buying this game for only £12 on Steam. The destruction is great, and I'm sure it is a decent tactical shooter, but the gun play itself leaves a lot to be desired.

    Do not buy this expecting a successor to Vegas-style gameplay. There isn't much to do beyond the siege game type. Terrorist hunt is shockingly bad, almost
    I hardly ever write reviews, but felt compelled to after [thankfully] buying this game for only £12 on Steam. The destruction is great, and I'm sure it is a decent tactical shooter, but the gun play itself leaves a lot to be desired.

    Do not buy this expecting a successor to Vegas-style gameplay. There isn't much to do beyond the siege game type. Terrorist hunt is shockingly bad, almost every entrance is blocked and you have to breach - no opening doors here.

    If you want something a littler spicier than camping inside small rooms, you're out of luck. No deathmatch, no team deathmatch, once you're dead in siege, you're dead and left waiting. No server browser, crappy matchmaking.

    I find the lack of variety in gameplay surprising considering how easy it would be to throw a few people on a map and let them shoot it out. If you're expecting ANYTHING like the previous instalments, you will be sorely disappointed.
    Expand
  2. Dec 17, 2015
    4
    Boosters, skins, all for microtransactions, i dont hate the game, it just shouldn't be rainbow six. The super fast gameplay is much like COD and on top of that there is no campaign. This game is far from worth $60
  3. Mar 21, 2021
    4
    There is so much wrong with this game.
    Where do I even start?
    Basically it has nothing to do with tactics and especially nothing with Rainbow Six anymore. - why are there no doors anywhere? No building has doors?! - no cool "slowly open door and peek" with your mousewheel anymore. A feature even the 18 (!) year old game Rainbow Six did have! - the "Operators" started out semi and
    There is so much wrong with this game.
    Where do I even start?

    Basically it has nothing to do with tactics and especially nothing with Rainbow Six anymore.

    - why are there no doors anywhere? No building has doors?!
    - no cool "slowly open door and peek" with your mousewheel anymore. A feature even the 18 (!) year old game Rainbow Six did have!
    - the "Operators" started out semi and pseudo-realistic but turned into a total Joke after only a year.
    -> now you have Characters that are like a mix of Call of Duty and Overwatch. Basically "Heroes" in a "tactical" Setting
    - Gampelay and rounds are essentially: Rushing in like a stressed and panicked speedrunner into buildings, breaching like crazy and shooting with guns that all have a weird little sway around the crosshair.

    Because anything slow and methodical wouldn't work for people with ADHS and the need to entertain huge E-sport-crowds, I guess?

    - the only time where you have at least a littlebit of methodical and tactical approach, is when you play with friends on "Training Grounds" (the former Terrorist Hunt"),
    but its nothing compared to SWAT 5 or the old Rainbow Six 3.
    -> All the AI-Enemies look the same,
    -> you can't even take bots as team-mates with you (you know, a feature even the 18 ! year old Rainbow Games had!)
    -> Ubi$oft nerfed the amount of "Renown" to oblivion (currency you need to unlock new characters (lol)) you get through single-player and coop-missions, so unlocking new operators takes horrendous amounts of time
    (~300 hours or you can spend real cash and that'll be over a hundred bucks. Just take a look at the currency-packs and the tiny amount of renown you earn ingame and do the math! There is a reason Ubi$oft keeps the Season-passes, ingame-currency and different editions as not selfexplanatory as possible!)
    -> Your weapons are less deadly and sometimes you'll have to shoot multiple rounds into enemies
    -> You can't make enemies give up / handcuff them
    -> downed AI-enemies will just die. They can't shoot at you or be secured or anything of this "boring tactical SWAT-stuff"

    So a LOT of the tention of true tactical shooters is gone.

    On the TECHNICAL side of things: Game cloggs 45 (!) gb on the hdd with only 14 maps (and no real bot-support and smaller mapsize in general!) compared to the 15 maps of RS 3 + 6 MP maps and additional fanmade maps = 21 maps! and runs worse with every update.

    Ubisoft decided to create a MOBA-Call-of-Duty-Overwatch mix for Twitch-streamers and the "E-Sports"-business, with zero intention to support the core-mechanic of tactical-shooters anymore.
    Their last "Playbook-Story-Trailer" made this pretty obvious.
    Expand
  4. Feb 7, 2016
    4
    Something about the way the game handles from a technical standpoint makes playing it almost physically painful. That, of course, pales in comparison to the emotional pain of knowing that I'll never get an experience like the original Rainbow Six games, or even the Vegas games back. The fact that Ghost Recon appears to be next after Future Soldier only makes this feeling worse.

    It
    Something about the way the game handles from a technical standpoint makes playing it almost physically painful. That, of course, pales in comparison to the emotional pain of knowing that I'll never get an experience like the original Rainbow Six games, or even the Vegas games back. The fact that Ghost Recon appears to be next after Future Soldier only makes this feeling worse.

    It makes me sad to play it, and though I got it for $40, I regret every last penny of that purchase and wish I'd bought Squad instead.
    Expand
  5. Dec 10, 2015
    4
    The game takes a good idea, and completely wrecks it. Almost like Ubisoft didn't even try, or was rushed. It is a great concept, but the coding of the game falls flat on its face when trying to deliver the experience. Every game begins with a match of RC Pro AM remote control car derby if your offense, or run around doing the same old BS if your defense. The netcode is from the 90's andThe game takes a good idea, and completely wrecks it. Almost like Ubisoft didn't even try, or was rushed. It is a great concept, but the coding of the game falls flat on its face when trying to deliver the experience. Every game begins with a match of RC Pro AM remote control car derby if your offense, or run around doing the same old BS if your defense. The netcode is from the 90's and bullets don't always register a hit, which is a HUGE issue considering that most of the time it is 1 shot 1 kill. Graphics are pretty heavily outdated, and in game actions are painfully ugly. Why can one side pick up barbwire, but the other can't? Who smashes barb wire with the butt of a gun? Who disarms a bomb with a butt of a gun? All these things make the game feel incomplete, rushed, and just pretty darn fake which takes you out of the immersion that it was designed to be. Lastly, content to price is far far FAR off! Wait until after Christmas, then pick it up for $19.99. But even then be careful, people may of stopped playing making matches almost impossible to find.... If they decide to even fix their online servers which go down constantly without any notice. Expand
  6. Dec 7, 2015
    4
    The game can be fun but there is a lot to be said for this game. It has moments of tense action but it feels like a game much cheaper than the 60 dollar price tag. No campaign, no real single player, the content is quite limited as well as the game modes. It's all variations on attack and defend. The variety of the original R6 titles are missing. The purely 1 life TDM in symmetrical mapsThe game can be fun but there is a lot to be said for this game. It has moments of tense action but it feels like a game much cheaper than the 60 dollar price tag. No campaign, no real single player, the content is quite limited as well as the game modes. It's all variations on attack and defend. The variety of the original R6 titles are missing. The purely 1 life TDM in symmetrical maps are gone. There is so much missing.

    The realism is there where 1 or 2 shots will kill but the netcode and/or hit detection is fuzzy as hell. Watching replays it's infuriating when even the replay shows the bullet "hits" not actually hitting you.

    The graphics are mediocre and are below what AAA titles provide these days.

    All and all the game would be great at about half the price it is currently. The game could be heading towards pre-mature obscurity with a dwindling playerbase. Hopefully they fix the price so more players can come in.
    Expand
  7. Jan 3, 2016
    4
    Shooda,Wooda,Cooda. I video game is only as good as its weakest link. In This case it has nothing to do with the great gameplay this game offers but instead its poor netcode and server stability.

    What good is an online only game if you can't connect to a server.
  8. Mar 26, 2016
    4
    It just isn't worth it. It's not worth 60 bucks. It's not worth playing alone. And it's not worth the name Rainbow Six, as it doesn't have a campaign, which made the series what it is. Every Rainbow Six had one, but hey threw it out of the window as soon as Tom Clancy couldn't argue about it, and it even costs much less money for Ubisoft. Obviously no reason to make it cost less than 60It just isn't worth it. It's not worth 60 bucks. It's not worth playing alone. And it's not worth the name Rainbow Six, as it doesn't have a campaign, which made the series what it is. Every Rainbow Six had one, but hey threw it out of the window as soon as Tom Clancy couldn't argue about it, and it even costs much less money for Ubisoft. Obviously no reason to make it cost less than 60 bucks. And they even could use his name. $$$ Expand
  9. Dec 4, 2015
    4
    The game itself is pretty good (9/10), but since it is based on multiplayer only, the horrible netcode makes the game a pain in the ass. Shooting an enemy to the head five times, seeing blood and then the guy turns areound, shoots back and kills you? That's routine. Just like other guys shooting air while they can't even see you, because you are hidden behind a wall (impenetrable) afterThe game itself is pretty good (9/10), but since it is based on multiplayer only, the horrible netcode makes the game a pain in the ass. Shooting an enemy to the head five times, seeing blood and then the guy turns areound, shoots back and kills you? That's routine. Just like other guys shooting air while they can't even see you, because you are hidden behind a wall (impenetrable) after you peaked and suddenly you are dead from their fire. Trying to hit someone with single shots while they are running is also a lottery. Either you are lucky and hit the spot where the game things the guys is, or the guy just runs away (while you clearly hit him in the back with your sniper rifle). That's the biggest problem the game has. There is also problem with clipping. When you lie down near a wall, quite often there is an enemy on the other side who can see your legs or head clipping through the wall. The worst thing about this is that they can just kill you while you can't do anything about it. I am not going to mention some smaller problems, because they are not important. Expand
  10. Aug 18, 2023
    4
    This game was good... when it first came out but now its nothing but an embarrasment of its former self.
    The fact they got rid of the night time maps, reworked good maps into subpar maps. They keep reworking operators that make them worse then what they were.
    Not to mention with the new operators the weapons they have are recycled. Instead of adding new weapons in. Also while on the weapon
    This game was good... when it first came out but now its nothing but an embarrasment of its former self.
    The fact they got rid of the night time maps, reworked good maps into subpar maps. They keep reworking operators that make them worse then what they were.
    Not to mention with the new operators the weapons they have are recycled. Instead of adding new weapons in. Also while on the weapon discussion they could let the operators from that particular country have a choice of both of the attackers and defenders weapons. So for example mute should have the choice of the sa80 along with his mp5k etc.
    Oh also the fact they changed from real factions to made up ones. So you won't see fbi, sas etc with any of the new operators.
    Not to mention the over the top skins you can get for the operators now.
    Tom clancy must be rolling in his grave.
    Expand
  11. Dec 1, 2015
    4
    There simply is not enough game here to warrant the price. As a huge fan of both rainbow six vegas games ((And all their respective DLC content)), I feel extremely disappointed. This game consists of 11 maps in its entirety. Their content roadmap states they will be adding 4 more over the next year. So sometime by Christmas Next year, there will be 15 Maps. ((MAYBE.))

    It is no
    There simply is not enough game here to warrant the price. As a huge fan of both rainbow six vegas games ((And all their respective DLC content)), I feel extremely disappointed. This game consists of 11 maps in its entirety. Their content roadmap states they will be adding 4 more over the next year. So sometime by Christmas Next year, there will be 15 Maps. ((MAYBE.))

    It is no coincidence that the ability to select game modes is hidden under different UI than any other FPS would ever have utilized. The Developers are clearly trying to stretch what little content they have as far as possible. This is shameful.

    What game is there is certainly nice. The guns are nothing particularly amazing, but passable. The explosives are enough to illicit some tactical play. Nothing here hasn't been done before, better, Elsewhere. For a game with so little, Ubisoft then has the nerve to put in a cash shop, for boosters and skins. In case you weren't getting all of the limited content fast enough, and so they can churn out more recycled garbage.

    The AI feels no different than it did in Rainbow Six Vegas 2.

    Rainbow Six Vegas 2 Released in 2008 with:
    12 maps, 4 DLC maps
    A Full Campaign.
    Extensive character Customization

    The Maps themselves do not feel NEARLY as exciting as those in Vegas 2. We were going through neon sign graveyards, Bright, loud casinos, of various makes, a whole construction zone for CQB training, Oil refineries, Trainyards....I had the most fun on a shooter I'd had up until that point. I was hoping to recover some of that, but the wind is right out of my sales.

    In Closing, This game is a major disappointment to any Vegas fan who expected more.
    Expand
  12. Dec 26, 2015
    4
    This game has low expectations for itself and fails to reach even those.

    Pro: Tactical Teamwork Con: Everything else. Is this what we expect for $60? It functions like Insurgency's autistic cousin. It tries to cover up it's horrible graphics with the most extreme case of Motion Blur I've ever seen. The AI will shoot you through walls with 100% accuracy (then instantly troll you
    This game has low expectations for itself and fails to reach even those.

    Pro: Tactical Teamwork

    Con: Everything else.

    Is this what we expect for $60? It functions like Insurgency's autistic cousin. It tries to cover up it's horrible graphics with the most extreme case of Motion Blur I've ever seen. The AI will shoot you through walls with 100% accuracy (then instantly troll you with a killcam). Guns have no recoil/uniqueness. You can only destroy objects/walls marked as destructable (not some Red Faction contender as lauded). Servers plainly don't work. No single player. 40% of the unique content requires microtransactions AT LAUNCH, feels like Game of War. R6 bucks my a $$.

    Multiplayer had the potential to be a fun $20 game on it's own, but it's lack of competition modes other than Attack/Defend make it absurdly over priced.

    A total bust. Thanks for the refund Steam.
    Expand
  13. Mar 21, 2016
    4
    The game itself trying to attempt a really good FPS online game. But it fails in a lot of points:
    - laggy server
    - bugs ( like drone is falling through the ground, not gaining points for victory or loss ) are just normal (after the third month of release date!) - the enemy can see you but you can't see the enemy. I was killed several times by invisible hostile players. The kill-cam
    The game itself trying to attempt a really good FPS online game. But it fails in a lot of points:
    - laggy server
    - bugs ( like drone is falling through the ground, not gaining points for victory or loss ) are just normal (after the third month of release date!)
    - the enemy can see you but you can't see the enemy. I was killed several times by invisible hostile
    players. The kill-cam shows me that the enemy allegedly was standing in front of me.
    -

    It isn't worth 60$ not even the half
    Expand
  14. Jan 28, 2018
    4
    Average
    Might be one of the best games , but under Ubisoft they ruined it
    First of all in the beginning the game was so cool and realistic now it seems a cartoon game more likely Overwatch than hunting Terrorists As every game of Ubisoft you must have a premade team to play if you don't have premade team you have trouble since the enemy team might be premade team even in Casual which
    Average
    Might be one of the best games , but under Ubisoft they ruined it
    First of all in the beginning the game was so cool and realistic now it seems a cartoon game
    more likely Overwatch than hunting Terrorists
    As every game of Ubisoft you must have a premade team to play
    if you don't have premade team you have trouble since the enemy team
    might be premade team even in Casual which is not fair for low levels players
    and that s why people quit , but I don't wonder since is an Ubisoft game
    and I can't expect the best , in the last years I am very negative towards Ubisoft .
    Expand
  15. Nov 19, 2019
    4
    Rainbow six siege is a Rollercoaster of Emotions. The Game is good, makes fun, has a lot of well implemented mechanics, but the Game still has its flaws that just ruin everything at least for me.

    Pros The overall Gameplay expirience is rly good Cons The hitboxes feel wanky some times, not sure if its the server that fails. The Balancing Team could be faster sometimes, There
    Rainbow six siege is a Rollercoaster of Emotions. The Game is good, makes fun, has a lot of well implemented mechanics, but the Game still has its flaws that just ruin everything at least for me.

    Pros
    The overall Gameplay expirience is rly good

    Cons
    The hitboxes feel wanky some times, not sure if its the server that fails.

    The Balancing Team could be faster sometimes, There times when a Operator gets banned every Match and they need like 3 Months to do a little nerf that doesn't change anything.

    The Matchmaking and Ranked Systems are garbage and thats also why I quit the Game, there times when the Game gives us Platin enemies when we are all just Silver or lower. And a Friemd of mine who is way better than me has the same Ranked cause Rainbows Ranking System is just bad

    The Maps are also an Interesting subject, Rainbow has a lot of Maps but most of them are just trash, there are just a Handfull of Maps that are well made, but with the huge load of bad Maps u get to play around 3 of 10 Matches with a good Map
    Expand
  16. Mar 31, 2020
    4
    Basically in this game strongly decides Donat, my PC still pulls badly, in general I will be desired by his players.
  17. Oct 12, 2020
    4
    The game mostly is not fun. First is that there's too many toxic people and reporting doesn't do anything, if someone leaves you can't also report them, the vote kick is also super rigged since if you find a toxic 4 stack you basically become their slaves because the vote kick system basically gets rid of the minority since 4 people have to vote to kick you, making solo queuing not funThe game mostly is not fun. First is that there's too many toxic people and reporting doesn't do anything, if someone leaves you can't also report them, the vote kick is also super rigged since if you find a toxic 4 stack you basically become their slaves because the vote kick system basically gets rid of the minority since 4 people have to vote to kick you, making solo queuing not fun sometimes. The game takes way too much time to load for everyone. I understand its a part of the game and I'm not saying to remove the ability to do it but spawn peaking is annoying to deal with and its super annoying to deal with defenders who jump off a second floor or they just exit the building and kill you with almost no risk since there's a 3 second countdown for the spawn peeker to only get spotted, the countdown can be reset if you go inside making it very easy to abuse the system. There are ways to deal with it, like droning certain areas, using long ranged operators like Glaz and Kali, but it just makes the game unfun having to constantly watching every peekable area so my team doesn't get killed. Sometimes the bullet don't register so headshots are kind of wonky, inconsistent sometimes and the game has several bugs but Ubisoft just wants to add more operator into a game with enough diversity for money, instead of actually fixing the terrible game. Expand
  18. Nov 14, 2021
    4
    If Ubisoft's studios release multiplayer games in the future, it's safe to assume that those games will have a short lifespan. The game is run by an incompetent producer who reflects their taste in the game and can't adjust the balance properly. Therefore, it is only natural that the games made by Ubisoft-affiliated studios have a short lifespan.
  19. Nov 10, 2022
    4
    just cheaters and campers
    just suck community
    just teamkill
    no more content
  20. Dec 15, 2015
    3
    Average game. Unfortunately it is marred by being totally unresponsive. You won't see the people that kill you until you see their kill cam. Do not buy.
  21. Dec 6, 2015
    3
    I fail to understand why Ubisoft took the direction it did. I thought during the Alpha that it was going to become something more. Instead, it seems to follow the direction most FPS out there are going and that is short term investment. Why did games for the PC support 8 player COOP in the past, but not today? I wished they had used the Unreal Engine 4. PC games are like 2nd classI fail to understand why Ubisoft took the direction it did. I thought during the Alpha that it was going to become something more. Instead, it seems to follow the direction most FPS out there are going and that is short term investment. Why did games for the PC support 8 player COOP in the past, but not today? I wished they had used the Unreal Engine 4. PC games are like 2nd class citizens now. We get ports, and everyone knows how well Ubisoft makes them. Look at Hawx.

    I'm not spending 60 dollars on a game with such limited content, no dedicated servers, and a MP only focus. It's pure laziness on the developers side, and like Activision it is a stab at the PC community to force us to play the way they want us to play. In the words Jay Wilson, "You are having fun incorrectly."

    I've waited over a decade for a true sequel to the original R6 series. Takedown: Red Saber could have been that had it not played like abandonware from day one.

    If Ubisoft really cared about the Tom Clancy series they would have taken a look at GroundBranch.
    Expand
  22. Jan 26, 2016
    3
    Rainbow six : Siege is an expensive multiplayer game with a very, very, very, very bad matchmaking system and netcode for the servers. The game is fundamentally good but you won't be able to enjoy properly because of its HUGE matchmaking issues and server issues. It has been released since several months now, and Ubisoft doesn't change anything, that means that they won't ever changeRainbow six : Siege is an expensive multiplayer game with a very, very, very, very bad matchmaking system and netcode for the servers. The game is fundamentally good but you won't be able to enjoy properly because of its HUGE matchmaking issues and server issues. It has been released since several months now, and Ubisoft doesn't change anything, that means that they won't ever change anything about it. RIP rainbow six siege, nice try. Expand
  23. Dec 30, 2015
    3
    In theory, this game is finally a new approach to online gaming. However, the sad truth is that Ubisoft simply can't satisfy online gamers due to a **** netcode, a bad foundation for a multiplayer game and a truly **** up price policy.

    This game should've been either a free2play title or a 20-25€/$ download title, not a full fledged 60€/$ full-price game with 29€/$ season pass attached
    In theory, this game is finally a new approach to online gaming. However, the sad truth is that Ubisoft simply can't satisfy online gamers due to a **** netcode, a bad foundation for a multiplayer game and a truly **** up price policy.

    This game should've been either a free2play title or a 20-25€/$ download title, not a full fledged 60€/$ full-price game with 29€/$ season pass attached to it.

    The matchmaking simply does not work. There is no server browser. There are 10 maps (that play exactly the same whether you play at day or night, since the core of the gameplay is focused on the INSIDE of the buildings) - 20 characters to chose from, that can't go through any progress, as there simply is no progression ingame. That's it. Roughly 3 modifications that are basically all the same and once you have unlocked everything (took me 20 hours for all modifications + all operators) then you're done with the game basically.
    Expand
  24. Dec 7, 2015
    3
    You can buy this. If price is about 20-25 euro. If you have friends(a team of 3 at least) - you can buy this for 35. If you love pain - you can buy it for full price and enjoy **** connection, matchmaking, lags, unsynchronized players (just like Battlefield, only worse!). And you can buy season pass for Windows hanging bugs (prepare your restart button). Tough it can be funny sometimes.You can buy this. If price is about 20-25 euro. If you have friends(a team of 3 at least) - you can buy this for 35. If you love pain - you can buy it for full price and enjoy **** connection, matchmaking, lags, unsynchronized players (just like Battlefield, only worse!). And you can buy season pass for Windows hanging bugs (prepare your restart button). Tough it can be funny sometimes. If you are not playing with a team of imbecile randoms, who don't do **** Expand
  25. Oct 25, 2016
    3
    Great Gameplay, Aweful Bugs, I Dont Want to Say What Bugs are Cause they aint few!
    But They Are Super annoying and piss me off, Most of The Times its Unplayable cause of Bugs!
    sometimes i cant aim, im system is glitchy and i got to restart the game and hope it fixed! Hate Ubisoft and all Its Games, Dont Buy anything from Ubisoft!!!!! Pity that i paid them to get this crap game specialy
    Great Gameplay, Aweful Bugs, I Dont Want to Say What Bugs are Cause they aint few!
    But They Are Super annoying and piss me off, Most of The Times its Unplayable cause of Bugs!
    sometimes i cant aim, im system is glitchy and i got to restart the game and hope it fixed!
    Hate Ubisoft and all Its Games, Dont Buy anything from Ubisoft!!!!!
    Pity that i paid them to get this crap game specialy that i bought GOLD!
    Expand
  26. Jan 4, 2017
    3
    Well where should i start?Hmm maybe with the netcode because its buggy as hell.Or with the fact that the servers are unstable and the game is annoying to play with.Lets talk about the graphics well its medicore at best but dont add anything to the games appeal.The community is toxic and plagged with hackers.Or with the balance of the game.The character design and their abilities are reallyWell where should i start?Hmm maybe with the netcode because its buggy as hell.Or with the fact that the servers are unstable and the game is annoying to play with.Lets talk about the graphics well its medicore at best but dont add anything to the games appeal.The community is toxic and plagged with hackers.Or with the balance of the game.The character design and their abilities are really cool and awsome but in reality some are overpowered and some are usless or just weak in general.Im not a big fan of "realistic" fps games but i played with arma and other fps games that required a lot of skill to play(im not saying that im a pro at fps videogames).In this game you dont need that much skill but a **** ton of luck because sometimes your bullets kill people instantly but usually they wonder off in to the other side of the room where is no enemy to be found and there is so many "spots" on the map where you get insta killed and you dont have a chance to counter.The maps are horrible and boring after a couple of rounds.Overall i dont know what ubisoft wanted with this game they tried to make a hardcore reallistic fps game but they failed miserably with mechanics which are for the call of duty type gamers.I cant recommend this game at all. (sorry for bad english not a native speaker) Expand
  27. Mar 14, 2017
    3
    HUGE disappointment if you were looking for something similar to any of the games in this franchise, It's okay if you want something extremely repetitive and lacking any depth or strategy.

    This should've been RS Patriots.
  28. Dec 5, 2018
    3
    A week ago I would certainly gave this game 9/10 to 10/10 I have over 500 hours on multiplayer but sadly the game devs are doing nothing to repair tons of bugs that are showing after each update, and after only few games now I saw a lot of new bugs, servers instability, plus new operators are directly how you shouldn't make multiplayer characters
  29. Mar 29, 2019
    3
    (take into consideration that i have played this game since it came out and i have over 3000 hours of game play)
    -graphics are good ( even better with the texture pack)
    -the idea is good but the execution is not as good -the mechanics are solid ( with the exception of some bugs) but the reason that i gave this game such a bad score is because despite its good qualities it keeps getting
    (take into consideration that i have played this game since it came out and i have over 3000 hours of game play)
    -graphics are good ( even better with the texture pack)
    -the idea is good but the execution is not as good
    -the mechanics are solid ( with the exception of some bugs)
    but the reason that i gave this game such a bad score is because despite its good qualities it keeps getting worst with each update.
    hackers are found in 3 matches out of 10 ( the difference of being able to reach diamond and staying plat 2 in rank)
    hitboxes are just broken and there are so many exploits (crouch spam,lean spam,sliding, glitches)
    and they are not doing anything about it, and every time they did something about it, it just made things even worst.
    i gave it a lot of chances to redeem it self but i cant recommend this game as its current stage.
    Expand
  30. Apr 11, 2020
    3
    The gameplay is fair and entertaining for about an hour or two.
    I bought this game for $60 when it was released years ago. A few years, it's a lot worse of a game. The microtransations are the biggest turn off for me. 1/3 of the game is locked behind a pay wall or requires 200+ hours of game time to "purchase". You earn a currency each round game, which is close to 1% of what is required
    The gameplay is fair and entertaining for about an hour or two.
    I bought this game for $60 when it was released years ago. A few years, it's a lot worse of a game. The microtransations are the biggest turn off for me. 1/3 of the game is locked behind a pay wall or requires 200+ hours of game time to "purchase". You earn a currency each round game, which is close to 1% of what is required to unlock a new character without any form of customization without paying. Stay away from this money pit.
    Expand
  31. Aug 8, 2021
    3
    А когда-то это была хорошая игра. Теперь же мы играем в шутер для киберспортсменов-пидарасо-негров с одинаковыми пушками у почти каждого нового опера. А все ульты оперов похерены тем что любой другой опер может взять пропил как гаджет.А когда-то это была хорошая игра. Теперь же мы играем в шутер для киберспортсменов-пидарасо-негров с одинаковыми пушками у почти каждого нового опера. А все ульты оперов похерены тем что любой другой опер может взять пропил как гаджет.
  32. Apr 13, 2021
    3
    "Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six" IS IT F*** AHAHAHAHA
    First of all, nope, this isn't Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six
    Second of all, this game sucks Gameplay: Camping simulator PVP: Camping simulator Maps: Camping simulator Graphics: Camping simulator Did i say this game is a camping simulator? But seriously now, I had a bit of fun back in 2017, i tried it recently and I can say
    "Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six" IS IT F*** AHAHAHAHA
    First of all, nope, this isn't Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six

    Second of all, this game sucks

    Gameplay: Camping simulator

    PVP: Camping simulator

    Maps: Camping simulator

    Graphics: Camping simulator

    Did i say this game is a camping simulator?

    But seriously now, I had a bit of fun back in 2017, i tried it recently and I can say I'd rather watch paint dry then play this game again, mostly because of how spoiled the whole thing is now.
    Too many operators, too many useless little gadgets

    Here one flaw the developers can't fix: community is awful, everyone is just "hardcore" and everyone wants to be the next esports player, while they all suck because no one even knows where right or left is.

    Its what it is, I wouldn't mind this game's existence if it was called "Tactical bomb squad" or some ****
    Expand
  33. Aug 8, 2021
    3
    ⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣
  34. Dec 6, 2021
    3
    I started playing this game in late 2016 which is about a year after its release. I was having lots of fun since I was playing a five stack with friends and we tried to approach each round like a true tactical shooter. I quickly realised that this game is nowhere near a tactical shooter and is basically COD on steroids but with worse hit register, gunplay and insane peekers advantage.I started playing this game in late 2016 which is about a year after its release. I was having lots of fun since I was playing a five stack with friends and we tried to approach each round like a true tactical shooter. I quickly realised that this game is nowhere near a tactical shooter and is basically COD on steroids but with worse hit register, gunplay and insane peekers advantage. Referring to the gunplay, bad players are rewarded because of the instant kill headshot mechanic. I've lost count of how many times I have died because someone couldn't control their spray and randomly shot my head. At the same time very good aimers are rewarded with this mechanic, it allows them to dominate the opponents by one-shotting them with any weapon.
    Secondly the desync between game clients and servers is simply ridiculous for a fast paced, competitive first person shooter. If you've never played this game, prepare to be shot at when the enemy hasn't even peeked at you yet on your screen. Also remember that even though you shot your opponent at least 5 times and have seen blood splatter all over the floor, it doesn't mean he has been hit at least once.
    It's been 6 years since the release of this game and I still feel like it's in beta stage. Every time a new update comes out some things get fixed, but more importantly more things get broken, more bugs, game breaking glitches. In 2019 I noticed this game does not want to have a future so I quit playing until about a month ago. I came back to this game only to find out that nothing has been done to the most critical issues. And now the cheaters: the game runs a battleye anticheat which is hardly doing anything. I've seen multiple cheaters at gold-platinum as well as at diamond-champion.
    The game is in a very bad state, players are leaving, pros are coming over to valorant and Ubisoft decided to move most of their dev team to the new extraction game instead of fixing siege. If the most popular siege content creators leave for any new games then I can officially call it dead.
    If only Ubisoft decided to stick to the original tactical shooter feel of the game and not the "cod on steroids with lots of microtransactions and pixel peeks" it would've been so much better. Well it's too late for it now, I've wasted around a 1000 hours fighting the game and not my opponents.
    Expand
  35. Jun 5, 2022
    3
    Old, outdated game from 2015. It's fun to play, if you can ignore the sweaty community and hackers. And if you can camp and hold a corner for 5 minutes without falling asleep or thinking about what you are doing with your life, then you're good.
  36. Mar 21, 2022
    3
    Mesmos bugs há mais de 2 anos, descaso com a comunidade, falta de mercado entre players e itens extremamente caros. Ubisoft seguindo o péssimo exemplo da EA. Mais um game que você deveria evitar.
  37. Mar 24, 2016
    2
    Atrocious networking, I run into all kinds of NAT and weird connection issues that I do not have in any other multiplayer games. What is up with never being able to join friends' squads but they can join mine anyway? Add on top the random crashes and I've just given up. What a waste of a potentially great game.
  38. Jun 19, 2018
    2
    Game is epic... but technical aspect of this game is rubbish. Servers, ghost algorithm, match making, make this game one of the worst I played in my life and also best game ever (idea of tactical fps). When you rich point of skill where you know the maps and operators, technical part will make this game so bad, that you will jump to another one. Overall bad game!
  39. May 16, 2017
    2
    Главная ошибка при покупке этой части R6 - думать, что вы покупаете тактический шутер.

    Игра вызывает двойственные чувства. Как тайтл R6 игра тянет на 2/10 - общего со всей серией радуги нет, развитие серии пришло к казуальщине. Что по ощущениям представляет из себя игра - call of duty.. или мод на неё Нужен ли был серии R6 мультиплеер вместо ко-оп? - Нет Было бы хорошо выпустить
    Главная ошибка при покупке этой части R6 - думать, что вы покупаете тактический шутер.

    Игра вызывает двойственные чувства. Как тайтл R6 игра тянет на 2/10 - общего со всей серией радуги нет, развитие серии пришло к казуальщине. Что по ощущениям представляет из себя игра - call of duty.. или мод на неё

    Нужен ли был серии R6 мультиплеер вместо ко-оп? - Нет

    Было бы хорошо выпустить редкую за последние годы игру про полицию и их спецотряды? - Да (но не про тренирующиеся друг с другом)

    "Только мультиплеер" привёл игру к балансным вещам, которые по факту выглядят убого, вооружение и прочие девайсы даже сложно описать словом абсурд, особенно посмеялся с тачанки и прочих стволов из 43го. Скоро добавят арбалет, так что стоит ждать совместку (в рекламных целях это не редкость) с Chivalry и появления оперативника в латах с луком. Проломы стен, разрушение объектов - всё выглядит смешно, даже такая игра как контр-страйк на её фоне выглядит симулятором спецназа. А АХТУНГ: R6 был симулятором, тут ничего общего с этим, казуальщина для сельской местности

    Не известно то, что нас ждало в отменённой "Patriots", но уверенность в том, что эта игра попала "мимо" не покидает игрока. Как f2p игра и (без шуток) конкурент Warface или Point Blank неплохо, но это не ААА тайтл ни в какой вселенной, а побаловаться пару часиков можно

    2/10
    Expand
  40. Dec 1, 2015
    2
    I am extremely surprised and disappointed with this game. After a year and a half the game is only what was shown at E3 2014, no improvements whatsoever, why it took so long to finish is beyond me.

    There is no story mode, only multiplayer, and no option to have AI teammates. The game is extremely limited. I was expecting it to be a modern version of rainbow six vegas 2, but instead you
    I am extremely surprised and disappointed with this game. After a year and a half the game is only what was shown at E3 2014, no improvements whatsoever, why it took so long to finish is beyond me.

    There is no story mode, only multiplayer, and no option to have AI teammates. The game is extremely limited. I was expecting it to be a modern version of rainbow six vegas 2, but instead you cannot select the mode, map or any details of terrorist hunts, it just cycles between different modes and maps. I prefer terrorists hunts and miss the day where you could play just that and pick your map and vary the amount of enemies, but no longer.

    Likewise the pvp aspect also goes between different game modes. They completely eliminate the ability to make your own choices in this game. And for any mode you no longer have your own character, you only purchase specific characters which are limited to a few weapons. So you can spend currency upgrading a weapon but might not be able to use that weapon unless you're the first to select that character.

    There are a lot of glitches in the game too, which with no changes to the game in a year I don't see how they havent fixed these big mistakes. Including seeing an enemy AI through a doorway and shooting them 15 times and it doesnt register any of the shots. Also for costing $60 MSRP (which im regretting the $30 I paid for it) the game acts much more like a free to play with all of the micro transactions to unlock guns and weapon skins.)

    Connection issues: Assume this is a start up problem but while matchmaking only 1/4 searches finds matches, usually youll connect and then the host will leave and it kicks you out or it just stops searching after 8 seconds and brings you back to menu.

    The only good I see from this game is that when selecting graphics options it explains exactly what all options does, which would be really good for any non-pc expert.

    TL;DR This game is a huge disappointment, and Ubisoft has proven once again to be a terrible dev company.
    Expand
  41. May 24, 2016
    2
    The gameplay is brilliant. But see how i noted the game ? The technical side shows how bad is Ubisoft at making PVP FPS.
    No mistake here, i love the idea of the game, i love the way it plays.
    Unfortunately, the hit detection is bad, the ping compensation is the worst i've seen in a FPS, the MM is regularly failing, and the anti-cheat is not working. Ubisoft does not communicate with
    The gameplay is brilliant. But see how i noted the game ? The technical side shows how bad is Ubisoft at making PVP FPS.
    No mistake here, i love the idea of the game, i love the way it plays.

    Unfortunately, the hit detection is bad, the ping compensation is the worst i've seen in a FPS, the MM is regularly failing, and the anti-cheat is not working.
    Ubisoft does not communicate with the community, and they probably won't improve much the game since the engine is not made for FPS games.

    My conclusion... it could have been brilliant and a major game, and now it's dying. Sad.
    Expand
  42. Jan 3, 2016
    2
    I was playing this game over 60 hours and now i have deinstall the technical broken piece of software. The gameplay can have make fun but currently the issue to big and cant anymore be to ignored.

    The Matchmaking is broken and Matches doesnt starting and stucking in perma loading screen. This two bugs a now over 8 days and no patches realeased for fixing. Another problem is the game
    I was playing this game over 60 hours and now i have deinstall the technical broken piece of software. The gameplay can have make fun but currently the issue to big and cant anymore be to ignored.

    The Matchmaking is broken and Matches doesnt starting and stucking in perma loading screen. This two bugs a now over 8 days and no patches realeased for fixing.

    Another problem is the game dont have Anti cheat protection and i see many cheaters in this game.
    Expand
  43. Jan 10, 2016
    2
    Unworthy of all the appraisal it has gotten in the community. The only reason this is seen as tactical is because of the destructible environment. Take away that, and it's just a buggy, laggy counter-strike source with gimmicky abilities. No single player campaign, one single PVP playlist, and a crappy terrorist hunt playlist. The AI in this game is absolutely pathetic. I think super marioUnworthy of all the appraisal it has gotten in the community. The only reason this is seen as tactical is because of the destructible environment. Take away that, and it's just a buggy, laggy counter-strike source with gimmicky abilities. No single player campaign, one single PVP playlist, and a crappy terrorist hunt playlist. The AI in this game is absolutely pathetic. I think super mario 64 had more impressive AI than this. normal/hard are way too easy, and Realistic turns every enemy into an aimbot machine. 0/10.

    Don't get me wrong, it's a fun game and there is some level of thought that needs to be put into the game. But for god's sake, don't go into matchmaking without at least 2 friends. You will get your ass kicked all day long.

    Another thing is how people say this game has the best community known to man. That's completely not true. I've seen my fair share of trolls who will instantly kill you when the round stars, and blast music through their mic just to annoy you. That's in 11 hours of play time.(not counting the beta, which had the same amount of content as the full version, LOL.)
    Expand
  44. Apr 17, 2017
    2
    A well-optimized game with a nice range of characters and abilities and extensive training missions, but that's about all it has going for it. It's marred by the traditional cripplingly low time-to-kill ratio, 1-death-and-you're-out match structure, grenade spamming, defense-oriented camping that puts the attackers at an inherent disadvantage, and of course, aggressive, insulting andA well-optimized game with a nice range of characters and abilities and extensive training missions, but that's about all it has going for it. It's marred by the traditional cripplingly low time-to-kill ratio, 1-death-and-you're-out match structure, grenade spamming, defense-oriented camping that puts the attackers at an inherent disadvantage, and of course, aggressive, insulting and unwelcoming players, even more so then most FPSs. If anything could make me nostalgic for Counter-Strike, it would be the Rainbow Six series. I actually managed to slip on the edge of a roof and fall to a downed state in an area where no one was able to revive me. Realism in games is not fun. All I can say is, I'm glad I didn't pay for this game Expand
  45. Aug 22, 2018
    2
    The game has a good concept, but its poorly executed. The amount of bugs glitches and unbalanced guns/characters make the game way less enjoyable than it should be.
  46. May 25, 2017
    2
    Replayability is key here. The game relies too much on multiplayer to make the game fun but its dead. As for single-player they threw in some missions that you have no control over what you want to take, such as gear, equipment, character, guns, etc. I don't even call it single-player, more of just "Look see we made offline missions now shut up." After you beat those in a few hours thereReplayability is key here. The game relies too much on multiplayer to make the game fun but its dead. As for single-player they threw in some missions that you have no control over what you want to take, such as gear, equipment, character, guns, etc. I don't even call it single-player, more of just "Look see we made offline missions now shut up." After you beat those in a few hours there is terrorist hunt mode which is just a wave survival. Don't get me wrong here its a good looking game and it plays nice but thats about it. Nothing TO PLAY. If they would have put some sort of custom missions that would have been a different story. I was expecting a lot more. Oh well back to the SWAT games. Expand
  47. Feb 11, 2018
    2
    **** this game, I smashed my mouse for 50 euros, headphones also barely go to me, anti-cheat is **** in older games there is no such problem, for example cs 1.6. Do you enter the game what greets you? A child is tearing at the whole house. And in the second team? ****ing cheaters who not pick you but he kill you, and on the demo it's like he got out in the middle. And hitbox, you shoot in**** this game, I smashed my mouse for 50 euros, headphones also barely go to me, anti-cheat is **** in older games there is no such problem, for example cs 1.6. Do you enter the game what greets you? A child is tearing at the whole house. And in the second team? ****ing cheaters who not pick you but he kill you, and on the demo it's like he got out in the middle. And hitbox, you shoot in the head and he do not get anything, he shoots you in the arm, and you get in the head, logic. Expand
  48. Mar 10, 2019
    2
    what we had in 2016 year: unique tactical coop experience, some kind of balance, cheaters a little, lot netcode problems, but lot of fun.

    What we have now: cheaters (in ranked, and casual - i don`t know what they got in casual), lot of skins, lot netcode problems, all game mechanic gone to arcade.

    Rest in peace.
  49. Dec 28, 2021
    2
    I would only recommend this game if you're living in 2015.

    Updates to this game have continues to warp its original vision. It's not a tactical game as advertised. Instead, you need to memorize 50 or so characters, their skins, their abilities, and how those abilities interact with each other. The current and final state of this game is a perfect example of too many cooks in the kitchen.
  50. May 15, 2022
    2
    Pros
    sometimes fun gameplay
    almost infinite replayability Good gunplay lots of different characters to play as fast loading times unless you don't have a SSD then please get one doesn't take long to find a match actually requires skill and not brainless tactics destructible environments Cons requires Ubisoft connect just to play on steam trash anti cheat horrid community
    Pros
    sometimes fun gameplay
    almost infinite replayability
    Good gunplay
    lots of different characters to play as
    fast loading times unless you don't have a SSD then please get one
    doesn't take long to find a match
    actually requires skill and not brainless tactics
    destructible environments
    Cons
    requires Ubisoft connect just to play on steam
    trash anti cheat
    horrid community
    servers get ddossed almost once a day resulting in high ping lobbies
    random teamkillers
    people being boosted to high ranks AKA retards in champion
    half the player base disappeared because Ubisoft is very retarded when managing games
    LMGS are extremely unbalanced
    grinding for levels and renown takes way too long
    discrimination against Russian players
    recycling old weapons for new ops instead of making new ones
    Ubisoft support is f*cking horrible didn't get the r6 credits from the welcome pack and they said they could do anything about it
    god awful hit registration/bad hitboxes
    Not beginner friendly
    retarded nerfs because ItS fOr ThE pRo LeAgUeS!
    disgustingly bad loot box system
    bugs lots of them
    devs are deaf and don't listen to the community
    Conclusion
    I could keep going about how much I hate this stupid game but ill stop here before I give you an aneurysm I have 2k hours on this game and I've been around since operation white noise and I'm extremely disappointed on how Ubisoft is handling siege like every time they make a nerf or a buff they balancing a note pad instead of an actual game that people play and enjoy its currently 20 dollars right now which is not bad but looking at this games current state I wouldn't recommend you buy and play this game so please don't buy this dumpster fire
    Expand
  51. Jun 14, 2021
    2
    更新越來越差,只會站在電競玩家的角度做更新,沒有 考慮到一般休閒玩家的心聲。把一些角色具有的強項與特色消除,實在是很令人無法接受。雖然有在努力封鎖外掛玩家,但阻止外掛的能力有限,因為這些不良玩家根本沒在怕,有錢的人都可以再次購買遊戲並創造新帳號,繼續破壞遊戲體驗,若是這些使用外掛的玩家沒有能像製造外掛並販賣的人一樣進行司法上的制裁,這些問題會一直持續下去。請再增設一個給中國大陸的專門伺服器(台灣、香港 另外),畢竟外掛玩家大多來自中國。遊戲對戰開始時,部分玩家會擅自退出遊戲(尤其是被敵方玩家擊殺後的玩家),這樣對其他努力遊玩的玩家非常不公平,應該要有擅自離開遊戲的懲罰機制。這次6月的更新最讓人不爽的是:
    幹員圖示很醜
    幹員圖示很醜 幹員圖示真他媽的有夠醜 Operator icon is so ugly Operator icon is so ugly
    更新越來越差,只會站在電競玩家的角度做更新,沒有 考慮到一般休閒玩家的心聲。把一些角色具有的強項與特色消除,實在是很令人無法接受。雖然有在努力封鎖外掛玩家,但阻止外掛的能力有限,因為這些不良玩家根本沒在怕,有錢的人都可以再次購買遊戲並創造新帳號,繼續破壞遊戲體驗,若是這些使用外掛的玩家沒有能像製造外掛並販賣的人一樣進行司法上的制裁,這些問題會一直持續下去。請再增設一個給中國大陸的專門伺服器(台灣、香港 另外),畢竟外掛玩家大多來自中國。遊戲對戰開始時,部分玩家會擅自退出遊戲(尤其是被敵方玩家擊殺後的玩家),這樣對其他努力遊玩的玩家非常不公平,應該要有擅自離開遊戲的懲罰機制。這次6月的更新最讓人不爽的是:
    幹員圖示很醜
    幹員圖示很醜
    幹員圖示真他媽的有夠醜
    Operator icon is so ugly
    Operator icon is so ugly
    Operator icon is so **** UGLY
    你們Ubisoft的UI設計師及美術團隊到底在想什麼?請把角色圖示的黑色邊框修改回來成白色的,遊戲總監的腦子真的也有問題,這麼醜的圖示跟UI都給過。
    這不是我喜歡的虹彩六號。
    This is not my Rainbow Six Siege.
    Expand
  52. Jan 10, 2018
    1
    Rainbow six games, to me, have always been about a decent counter terrorism story, loadout customization, and terrorist hunt. This game has almost none of this. It is a multiplayer centered shooter, where terrorist hunt is frowned upon because it does not provide enough of a reward, so not many people play it. Loadouts are another huge issue for me. The weapons are specific to the factionRainbow six games, to me, have always been about a decent counter terrorism story, loadout customization, and terrorist hunt. This game has almost none of this. It is a multiplayer centered shooter, where terrorist hunt is frowned upon because it does not provide enough of a reward, so not many people play it. Loadouts are another huge issue for me. The weapons are specific to the faction a character is from. In rb6, its made up of forces from all over the world, so why cant I select any weapon from all over the world, too? As for the story, apparently the game asks "What's Story?" cause there is none. This is a slap in the face to Tom Clancy and is very much intended to be a mulitplayer 5v5 shooter with the wrong label slapped on it. Should have just been called Siege as its not rainbow six. Expand
  53. Dec 1, 2015
    1
    No 3rd person cover mode. This is literally what put Rainbow 6 on the map. I don't know why you would do away with one of the best features to date. It is what made it unique, Literally brought the franchise backwards as it plays like Delta force 2 on a 486 computer. Choppy at times. Stiff movement and not fun to play. Don't waste the money on it like I did. Unless they can put the vegasNo 3rd person cover mode. This is literally what put Rainbow 6 on the map. I don't know why you would do away with one of the best features to date. It is what made it unique, Literally brought the franchise backwards as it plays like Delta force 2 on a 486 computer. Choppy at times. Stiff movement and not fun to play. Don't waste the money on it like I did. Unless they can put the vegas style fight mechanic back in it. The game is a bust. Expand
  54. Dec 2, 2015
    1
    It's basically a glorified version of Counter-Strike with destructible walls and a couple of more gadgets. Which is not a bad thing. Counter-Strike is very popular. However, it is lacking in some key areas. Small number of maps. No dedicated servers. Cannot play vs. your friends. Only 5 v 5.

    As professional reviews have stated...this is basically a demo. But my biggest issue is
    It's basically a glorified version of Counter-Strike with destructible walls and a couple of more gadgets. Which is not a bad thing. Counter-Strike is very popular. However, it is lacking in some key areas. Small number of maps. No dedicated servers. Cannot play vs. your friends. Only 5 v 5.

    As professional reviews have stated...this is basically a demo. But my biggest issue is that it is literally 4 times as expensive as Counter-Strike. $60 is laughable for this content.
    Expand
  55. Jun 15, 2019
    1
    Completely awful and slow camping simulator! I just can't understand why it is praised so much. I get that it's not my style of game, and I can see why some people like it. I adore that it keeps getting content after so many years. Any of the above won't stop me for giving it a 1/10 simply due to too much aiming through butt cracks for easy kills.
  56. Dec 5, 2015
    1
    no campaign no co-op campaign just multiplayer and small co-op terror hunts NOT worth the money.
    I think you are better off waiting till the price hits rock bottom like £5 in the bargain bin.somthing tells me that wont be long.
  57. Dec 12, 2015
    1
    Ubisoft has hit an all time low. Charging on both ends and even if one did pay for the completely absurd mircotransactions- it still falls short of being worth it.

    There is a lot of potential with this game, but their sheer greed has ensured that this game will die on the vine. Welcome to the no-fly list Ubisoft, you will never get another dollar from me, I promise you.
  58. Dec 3, 2015
    1
    This game is childish and non-realistic. And for me it has nothing to do with famous classical Rainbow Six series. Let me explain some details about it. My personal opinion about single-player (I understood, that the game is probably targeting the multiplayer), what I don't like in this game:
    - the atmosphere completely lost. I didn't feel like I am on a dangerous and important missions
    This game is childish and non-realistic. And for me it has nothing to do with famous classical Rainbow Six series. Let me explain some details about it. My personal opinion about single-player (I understood, that the game is probably targeting the multiplayer), what I don't like in this game:
    - the atmosphere completely lost. I didn't feel like I am on a dangerous and important missions anymore. The mission in a plane gave me chills of nostalgia at first time I see it. But then, it came to nothing. The game is absolutely empty;
    - terrorists stay on their points and wait while you find them like dummies in the SWAT playground. Great, that's what I expect of Rainbow Six series;
    - terrorists shout about their actions loud, just I can kill them easily: "Reloading!", "Move to intercept". One of them shouted: "Hostile spotted!", just before shooting at me, and that gave me time to kill him first. Thanks!
    - one player campaign is dull, uninteresting and remind me of some bad B-movie;

    And more, and more. Just don't want to talk about this game anymore. Judge by yourself.
    Expand
  59. Jan 2, 2016
    1
    1 point for single player. Multiplayer is simply not working. Game has serious camera issues. (You can't see the enemy, but he can see half of your body) Random grenade kills (got killed through solid wall) Defense cannot leave the building. (In tutorial enemy always waits at extract, but you are unable to do the same) You cannot choose the map you would like to play. All the scenarios1 point for single player. Multiplayer is simply not working. Game has serious camera issues. (You can't see the enemy, but he can see half of your body) Random grenade kills (got killed through solid wall) Defense cannot leave the building. (In tutorial enemy always waits at extract, but you are unable to do the same) You cannot choose the map you would like to play. All the scenarios feel the same. The could have easily replaced hostage/bomb/hazardous material with a flag or potato... Expand
  60. Jan 29, 2016
    1
    Overall, a terrible game. No single player campaign. Multiplayer is simplistic and repetitive. Terrorist Hunt is one hell of a devious attempt to force players to repeat themselves endlessly without hope of ever completing a mission. The real worry here is that Ubisoft has 3 big titles coming up this year. Far Cry, Deus Ex and Ghost Recon. If the same development team is in charge of thoseOverall, a terrible game. No single player campaign. Multiplayer is simplistic and repetitive. Terrorist Hunt is one hell of a devious attempt to force players to repeat themselves endlessly without hope of ever completing a mission. The real worry here is that Ubisoft has 3 big titles coming up this year. Far Cry, Deus Ex and Ghost Recon. If the same development team is in charge of those too, we may see the company fold. The sales for this game were poor from the start and never recovered despite some much needed patches. If the other games are the same, it's goodbye Ubisoft. For what it's worth, I say good riddance. Expand
  61. Feb 6, 2016
    1
    the matchmaking is so bad it ruins the whole experience, and it makes me hate the game, which is sad because it could be a great team based-fps. The patches doesn't work either.
  62. Apr 12, 2016
    1
    Worst PVP game ever. Almost every kill is a Headshot, dont care about the logic, you just shoot in enemy direction and he dies. Sometimes the enemy dont appear on your screen while the enemy is looking in the room since 1 sec so you die without have any chance. Last game i bought from Ubi$oft, the biggest **** game ever without any server in middle europe, pings always over 50, lagWorst PVP game ever. Almost every kill is a Headshot, dont care about the logic, you just shoot in enemy direction and he dies. Sometimes the enemy dont appear on your screen while the enemy is looking in the room since 1 sec so you die without have any chance. Last game i bought from Ubi$oft, the biggest **** game ever without any server in middle europe, pings always over 50, lag compensation. A wannabe tactic game with so many bugs, that i prefer ArmA more than this. Expand
  63. Jul 5, 2016
    1
    This game made so much fun until the new Operator came out.... Frost was a really op char because her shotgun killed everything. They nerfed her shotgun and everything was fine again until the Blackbeard came out... he is the most overpowered character ever...
  64. Nov 23, 2016
    1
    I don't know why so many guys still playing this game.
    this game got a buggy net-code and update is little as tail of mouse.
    ubisoft locked all around the bugs in this game. I can't believe how this game has pro league? + Great personalities on characters + Small size tactics - Sensitive and unstable servers (Net-code) - awful DLC policy - little amount of update - so many bugs
    I don't know why so many guys still playing this game.
    this game got a buggy net-code and update is little as tail of mouse.
    ubisoft locked all around the bugs in this game. I can't believe how this game has pro league?
    + Great personalities on characters
    + Small size tactics
    - Sensitive and unstable servers (Net-code)
    - awful DLC policy
    - little amount of update
    - so many bugs (body coming out from the wall and stuttering issues and Etc)
    - bad team balancing
    - repeating gameplay
    - bad balancing (especially from DLC's)
    - Bad hit detections
    Expand
  65. Dec 22, 2016
    1
    A glitch fulled horrible mess. Hackers shooting through walls with a terrible anti-hack system. I've even seen people flying. On xbox one I wrote a good review but on PC this is just terrible.
  66. Jan 22, 2017
    1
    So many things wrongs with this game to list here but I'll list a few. First, the G** D*** suicide bombers are the most annoying aspect of any shooter I think I've ever played. Second, where's the customization we had in previous games like Rogue Spear? Can only use mp5 for defense? Are you kidding me Ubisoft? How freaking stupid is this?. This game is awful. It just makes me wish forSo many things wrongs with this game to list here but I'll list a few. First, the G** D*** suicide bombers are the most annoying aspect of any shooter I think I've ever played. Second, where's the customization we had in previous games like Rogue Spear? Can only use mp5 for defense? Are you kidding me Ubisoft? How freaking stupid is this?. This game is awful. It just makes me wish for classics like Rogue Spear. How about a reboot of that great game guys? I miss the truly open maps of your classics and the ability to use any weapon in the arsenal. What were you guys thinking?
    This game is just awful. Don't reward companies for garbage like this like I did. Regret spending money on this garbage.
    Expand
  67. Jul 18, 2018
    1
    Before, Rainbow Six: Siege used to be one of the best games, but now, most of the members are toxic. And, Ubisoft recently implemented a toxicity filter, where if you say anything toxic, you get banned. Before that, I rarely encountered people using toxic language. But now, way more people than before start calling people different spellings of the n word to get around the ban, whereBefore, Rainbow Six: Siege used to be one of the best games, but now, most of the members are toxic. And, Ubisoft recently implemented a toxicity filter, where if you say anything toxic, you get banned. Before that, I rarely encountered people using toxic language. But now, way more people than before start calling people different spellings of the n word to get around the ban, where before almost no-one used anything of that sort. And, there are people tricking other people into saying banned words, and I got tricked, and I was banned for 30 minutes (not too bad) and lost a ranked match and put my team at a huge disadvantage since it kicked me out. I would give this game an 8 or a 9 but because of how toxic the community has gotten after they implemented a horrible toxicity filter, I'm giving this game a 1. No other game immediately bans you for using a bad word. They often block your ability to chat for a while, or will replace those words with something else. But Siege just goes and bans you, even if you didn't mean to say it and were tricked. Also, if you type to someone to bring frags (frag grenades) and forget to type the r, you're banned. No way to undo the ban. And, I think that ban prevents you from refunding the game on Steam, so if you're tricked into saying something and you get banned, and you don't like the game, you're stuck with it. Also, there are words I've never even knew were toxic such as "c**n" (replace * with o.) And, in ranked, there are huge amounts of cheaters because Ubisoft hasn't updated the anti-cheat in a while. Overall, I would wait to get this game until this is all resolved. Expand
  68. Nov 14, 2018
    1
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. #UbiPLS #NoCensorship
    I don't care about stupid Chinese. I don't want the game to turn into airsoft. **** chingchongs
    Expand
  69. Apr 7, 2020
    1
    The game is quite fun even if it's bugged and poorly done (also developer's seems not intersted in fixing it), but it's a scam, this sh!t must be F2P. You need to grind 500h to unlock the contenet you paid for
  70. Jan 17, 2020
    1
    1 shot head shot mechanics ok
    Does your net code/hit detection is on par to support such crap? No, obviously not

    Does waiting 4-5 minutes to get to play again because someone decided to pull off a cheap spawn killing tactic seem ok?

    Or waiting 4-5 minutes because of lucky 1 shot head shot?

    Did I forget to mention how slow the matchmaking is too?
  71. Feb 14, 2020
    1
    Battlepass for Free-To-Play games, not Buy-To-Play.
    Ubi, are you have conscience?
  72. Mar 2, 2021
    1
    No balance. Stupid game. I go once every six months and understand that the game is only getting worse. Ubisoft should be banned from making games.
  73. Dec 19, 2020
    1
    This game has the potential but the way ubi treats it is just sad. Servers are absolute garbage and need upgrading. Making the overlay more buggier like the game is THAT optimized.
  74. Dec 20, 2020
    1
    This game was great when it was in it's first year or two. Now, if you don't understand how to effectively use gadgets, you will not win. It doesn't matter if you have the aim of a God or not. If you don't understand how gadgets work and interact with each other, you will not find success in this game. Not to mention that Ubisoft doesn't listen to the majority of it's player baseThis game was great when it was in it's first year or two. Now, if you don't understand how to effectively use gadgets, you will not win. It doesn't matter if you have the aim of a God or not. If you don't understand how gadgets work and interact with each other, you will not find success in this game. Not to mention that Ubisoft doesn't listen to the majority of it's player base whatsoever. They only sometimes listen to the pro players. I won't even mention the toxicity. Expand
  75. Jan 21, 2021
    1
    i spend 2700 h playing this game. Its was fun at early, but slowly it started (after chimera) turnig into **** Broken sound, insane amount of cheater, horrible hitreg. Developers stop making content for game - instead of new map we got trash rework. instead of normal opr - clown garbage with old mechanics from chimera or just useless not working ability. Imitation of work - they fix somei spend 2700 h playing this game. Its was fun at early, but slowly it started (after chimera) turnig into **** Broken sound, insane amount of cheater, horrible hitreg. Developers stop making content for game - instead of new map we got trash rework. instead of normal opr - clown garbage with old mechanics from chimera or just useless not working ability. Imitation of work - they fix some minor bags from 2016 in 2019 afte all this years. F this game. I quit Expand
  76. Feb 7, 2021
    1
    Pluses .. one of a kind game. Minuses... cheaters and smurfs, if you try to play rating without wallhack and aimbot, you will be **** in all holes by smurfs, who have 52 account level, and they play better than cheaters. Do not try to buy the game until ubisoft has banned all smurfs and cheaters once and for all
  77. Dec 16, 2021
    1
    The game is more frustrating than fun to play. There are cheaters and smurfs ruining game lobbies. Idk how their garbage matchmaking system works but they really need to rework it.

    Save yourself from pain, dont buy this game. Let it die just like overwatch.
  78. Sep 6, 2023
    1
    since 2018 the game will close with no explaination. also alt tabbing gives oyu an unplayable from a competitive standpoint delay. Audio is broken
  79. Apr 22, 2022
    1
    Le jeu fait la part belle aux cheat et aux toxiques, incroyable ce qu’a fais Ubi avec le tir allié. Réagissez
  80. Jan 12, 2016
    0
    Took me 5 hours to install the game between crashes, failed updates and Uplay.

    When I finally think I'm getting somewhere and the game loads the Multiplayer starts crashing after joining a match. Tried all the tricks in the book and was unsuccessful in fixing the problem. Support is of no help at all.

    Paid 60$ for a **** singleplayer campaign.

    I think I've found a company as bad as EA.
  81. Jun 8, 2016
    0
    Tom Clancy is turning in his grave. I'm not sure who took over when Tom Clancy passed away but they are doing an awful job trying to cash in on the legendary writers name. Tom always wanted his name to represent quality and that is why Rainbow Six was always known as a special forces simulator. Every time I played it since childhood I had a blast. Rainbow six is the sole reason that fueledTom Clancy is turning in his grave. I'm not sure who took over when Tom Clancy passed away but they are doing an awful job trying to cash in on the legendary writers name. Tom always wanted his name to represent quality and that is why Rainbow Six was always known as a special forces simulator. Every time I played it since childhood I had a blast. Rainbow six is the sole reason that fueled my interest in military life and eventually led me to serve my country.

    This game has nothing from Rainbow Six series :(
    Expand
  82. Dec 1, 2015
    0
    Tom Clancy is turning in his grave. I'm not sure who took over when Tom Clancy passed away but they are doing an awful job trying to cash in on the legendary writers name. Tom always wanted his name to represent quality and that is why Rainbow Six was always known as a special forces simulator. Every time I played it since childhood I had a blast. Rainbow six is the sole reason that fueledTom Clancy is turning in his grave. I'm not sure who took over when Tom Clancy passed away but they are doing an awful job trying to cash in on the legendary writers name. Tom always wanted his name to represent quality and that is why Rainbow Six was always known as a special forces simulator. Every time I played it since childhood I had a blast. Rainbow six is the sole reason that fueled my interest in military life and eventually led me to serve my country.

    -The is probably the biggest disappointment of the year for me and probably any fan of the franchise. No single player?! What? Rainbow six always had an amazing single player experience, multiplayer was just an addition. This is by far the biggest negative the game has.

    -The game plays like a mix of call of duty and battlefield, this is not a good thing because Rainbow six was always unique in it's own style. It was the arma or flashpoint of special forces. Not a generic shooter.

    -The AI is stupid. I haven't seen such useless AI in years, I didn't even think it was possible for developers take so many steps backwards in coding the AI, but rainbow six siege just proves it.
    At one moment I was on one side of the room looking at an open door, I see an AI run up and hide beside the door entrance with his arm sticking out in my view. I just pistol his arm till he died. Then a second AI ran up and I did the same.

    -The game is a borefest. Like I said it feels like a generic shooter mixed with call of duty. I already played black ops 3 and it was crap, why would I want to play another call of duty type game this year.

    -Absolutely no incentive to work as a team. In Rainbow six it was a blast working as a team.

    -The levels are boring. Anyone remember Rainbox six vegas? It looked amazing at the time, the attention to detail was phenomenal. Remember looking out the window from the casino beyond the city scape and seeing little cars driving on the road in the distance? Well In siege you won't find that. The maps are boring and bland.

    -Destructibility is nothing new, just generally under utilized by game developers because they are lazy. Anyone remember red faction?

    -The rifle and pistol sounds, very unrealistic. As someone who has spent a lot of time at the range I can tell you this game actually has worse sounds than call of duty.

    All in all, I feel bad that Tom Clancy's name is smeared in this trash game. Please don't buy this just to show them we want a real rainbow six game and not call of duty.
    Expand
  83. Dec 6, 2015
    0
    I was expecting a standalone game as Rainbow Six Vegas had an excellent single player campaign, but i guess those days are long gone ever since companies like Ubisoft and R* have started a new trend of micro transactions which focuses less on game play and more on grabbing the money from gamer. Disappointing !
  84. Jan 31, 2016
    0
    The whole idea of the game and how it works is great, and if your lucky to get into the rare multiplayer game with even teams and no severe lag it can be a blast. But more so than not, your spending more time trying to get the game working and being properly put into matchmaking than actually playing.

    Game has horrible networking with consistent lag and tick rate, you get shot/killed by
    The whole idea of the game and how it works is great, and if your lucky to get into the rare multiplayer game with even teams and no severe lag it can be a blast. But more so than not, your spending more time trying to get the game working and being properly put into matchmaking than actually playing.

    Game has horrible networking with consistent lag and tick rate, you get shot/killed by people who you cant even see. Will NEVER be an Esport, was rushed out the door for the holidays and ubisoft seems to have no intention of seriously fixing the networking of the game.

    Don't waste your money.
    Expand
  85. Aug 13, 2016
    0
    Hit registration issues still exists after so much updates, mach making is lotery, sometimes you cant see enemy in enviroment textures, very ping dependand game. The game can be great in not GREADYsoft.
  86. Jan 3, 2016
    0
    Smokescreen, failure to synchronize, error codes, random crash & disconnects, I cannot give the game any other notation because I can't actually play the game.
  87. Dec 2, 2015
    0
    Crash report + 2x00000000041 error + Disconnecting from the server + Lags + bags = Ubisoft trash quality
    Btw in beta it was ok.
    Do not buy this game. Its like Evolve. After 2 months will be dead.
  88. Mar 22, 2018
    0
    The game used to be good, then lootbox come in, and everything turn to ****
    Ubisoft insult old player and abandon what make the game good and turn it into milking machine instead of a game.
  89. Dec 29, 2016
    0
    This game was fun (respect between players) but now the community exist only of trollers cheaters and teamkillers. Netcode is the worst I have seen in a video game. If you search for a good FPS skip this piece of **** (less headache).
  90. Dec 8, 2015
    0
    This is not Rainbow Six.
    If it were called something else I would rate it closer to 9.
    Ubisoft cannot just ride on the name of a franchise by creating a game that is not true to the franchise.
    Rest in peace Tom Clancy and be glad you never saw what happened to Rainbow Six.
  91. May 2, 2018
    0
    A game with potential, but after playing 200 hours I can say that both ubisoft and battleye are a joke. Never have I played a game with this many hackers its like they are trying to compete with PUBG, or maybe they just ban some hoping people will re-buy their game, but one thing is certain battleye is one **** anti-cheat just look at their portfolio of games, all or most are infested withA game with potential, but after playing 200 hours I can say that both ubisoft and battleye are a joke. Never have I played a game with this many hackers its like they are trying to compete with PUBG, or maybe they just ban some hoping people will re-buy their game, but one thing is certain battleye is one **** anti-cheat just look at their portfolio of games, all or most are infested with hackers. Also the game suffers from horrible net-code or maybe its just the lack of good dedicated servers either way you notice it all the time, information delay and the likes. Perspective is another issue with this game which I believe will never be fixed, getting shot by a head sticking out behind a counter or maybe a shoulder killing you from around the corner, which is kinda funny since this game promotes peaking and leaning around corners. Expand
  92. Dec 2, 2015
    0
    Rainbow Six is a novel based on Tom Clancy's book, the original series had: Single Player (very elaborated btw (cause Tom Clancy was alive)), dozens of weapons to choose or even not carry any guns for any operator (several agents from around the world recruted to R6), you could choose from several camouflage suits, choose if it was heavy, medium or light armor, the kind of bullet to use inRainbow Six is a novel based on Tom Clancy's book, the original series had: Single Player (very elaborated btw (cause Tom Clancy was alive)), dozens of weapons to choose or even not carry any guns for any operator (several agents from around the world recruted to R6), you could choose from several camouflage suits, choose if it was heavy, medium or light armor, the kind of bullet to use in your weapons (rubber, hollow, fma, etc), a super detailed planned phase with briefing and realism (one well aimed pistol shot and you are dead, even on heavy armor).
    All that... is gone... as other guy said in another review Tom Clancy is turning in his grave... in Siege you have Operators, from diferent CTU around the globe (not R6 agents) using their CTU gear (R6 did not have any of those, they should not be recognized as they were a SECRET CTU).. some operators only have one primary weapon, you can't choose not to pick a weapon, you can't host your own game if you want. There is a progression system on MP where you can accelerate the process putting more money on it (original R6 MP let every one pick whatever they want, everyone was equal). Sometimes you have to shoot 5-10 times to kill a terrorist... you have an HP bar... the graphical settings have to be tweked or it will look terrible (all console filters on)

    And that is it... I just lost any hope on this series
    Expand
  93. Feb 16, 2016
    0
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Con-
    When this game came out it played like a beta. -1pts

    To report an actual cheater/glitcher It will literally take you 5-10 minutes. and then its unlikely anything will happen unless you filmed it. -2pts

    When you **** up the match for you team by killing the hostage there is no consequence. This doesn't sound to bad until you realize how often it actually happens. -1pts

    The matchmaking system is horrible for ranked play. The system they use searches for players your level to join with so its an even match, this only works if theirs plenty of people playing, unfortunately you'll be lvl 30 and joined with three other lvl 30s and maybe a 60, and the other team is full of 60+ lvl players that are max ranked lvl because the system joins them together on the same team first. This makes winning any ranked game Very difficult as it Literally stacks the best players against you most of the time. -2pts.

    There is a horrible random crash that will crash the game during a game. At any moment usually within the first round. this can happen as often as 3 out of every 4 games or maybe not at all. It all depends. -1pts

    UPLAY has to be used which is horrible, just horrible for PC players at least. -2pts

    It can take up to 2-3 mins just to join a game. That added in with the fact that it might crash for no reason means it could and has taken me 10+ mins to join an actual game. Which just sucks -2pts

    No hardcore mode for a game that lacks the need for a more realistic mode, this usually wouldn't be a problem, but this is a Rainbow is game, a game Known for its realistic modes, not the **** shot several times and still running around stuff. -3pts

    = -14

    Pro-

    Great take on a played out idea for a game +1pts

    Full Price game but all DLCs are free after initial week +2pts

    Characters are decently balanced + 1pts

    Cheaters perma banned +1pts

    The Game visually looks Great +1pts

    The game does have destructibility +1pts

    Nearly every game plays different +1pts

    = +8

    Total - 6

    I really do like the Idea of this game, it could be Amazing, But several months and a major update in and its NOT worth it. **** this ****
    Expand
  94. Jan 15, 2016
    0
    Every time the game crashed on me, there are 2 windows appearing, one is about sending crash report, one is about The Division, trying to fool me again, HA, like hell i will buy another Ubi game ever again, such a shame to be living in the same city with the worst dev in the industry.
  95. May 30, 2017
    0
    This game is out for a year and half. And its like this:
    Hello everybody and welcome to Jackass...oh wait...sorry...welcome to Rainbow Six Siege which is quite the same. Enjoy lags, bugs, cheaters and broken hit boxes (now quite fixed). Test your internet connection in 5 vs 5 team death-match, where tactics and objective doesn't matter. Here your skill or tactical knowledge is nothing, if
    This game is out for a year and half. And its like this:
    Hello everybody and welcome to Jackass...oh wait...sorry...welcome to Rainbow Six Siege which is quite the same. Enjoy lags, bugs, cheaters and broken hit boxes (now quite fixed). Test your internet connection in 5 vs 5 team death-match, where tactics and objective doesn't matter. Here your skill or tactical knowledge is nothing, if your opponent has better connection or cheats. You will be pared with players with higher or lower levels or ranks, which are not even close to yours. Enjoy your silver skill getting smashed by platins and diamods, who are really good, cheaters or ESL players with new accounts. Try all different weapons and find out, that shotguns are sniper rifles and sniper rifle does same damage as pistols. Let's kill a man (or woman) with half of the magazine from your machine gun to the head or with just 3 shots from a pistol to the body. With our anti-cheat placebo (FairFight and BattlEye) you can report who you want, because it doesn't work. You're reporting to FairFight, but BattlEye gives bans. Logic.exe not found...
    Expand
  96. Dec 26, 2015
    0
    Has nothing to do with the real Rainbow Six...instead, some creepy Manga style characters are now in place and a childish "skill" system...means, different actors with different skills...Idea is logical, reality is a mess.
  97. Dec 2, 2015
    0
    Rainbow six games always have single player mode and Rainbow six siege have amazing single player. Developers say on E3 that this game will have single players and it s awesome i cant stop playing single player story is intense and amazing.
  98. Dec 20, 2015
    0
    As a Rainbow Six fan all I can say about this game - ****
    As UBI's DEVs have no idea about military, they will ruin the rest Tom Clancy's game series in the future. Screw Ghost Recon Wildlands too. No tactics only CoD run'n'gun crap. Fck you, noobisoft.
  99. Dec 30, 2015
    0
    First of all: If you can play the game, it has its moments. A new and fresh idea, pretty good balanced classes, and good graphics.

    But the reality looks like this: At least 50% of the games you will have some kind of crash or problem. This goes up to 80% when you are playing in the evening when most of the other players are online. It's sad, but I'm not exaggerating. The game can
    First of all: If you can play the game, it has its moments. A new and fresh idea, pretty good balanced classes, and good graphics.

    But the reality looks like this: At least 50% of the games you will have some kind of crash or problem. This goes up to 80% when you are playing in the evening when most of the other players are online. It's sad, but I'm not exaggerating.

    The game can crash or give you an error message in any stage, for example:

    You are trying to create a lobby with three friends... CRASH

    You restart the game (I forgot to tell: You can't skip the intro, so I had days where i watched it 20 times while restarting the game) and invite your friends again into the lobby... ERROR

    5 minutes later finally all your friends have joined the lobby again. You start searching for a game... CRASH

    After restarting you give it another try. Finally, after 10 minutes of searching for a match you get one. But hey, have really all of your friends joined the match? Of course not, because one got an ERROR message.

    15 minutes later, you can finally join a game with all your friends. Everything looks good, you can play the first rounds. Maybe your team is about to win. And then it comes, the loading screen of the last round ... CRASH

    ...

    This description is no product of my fantasy! It goes like that every single time, on every frickin' day.

    I have had days, where I spend twice as much time in the loading screen or in the lobby menu, as I had real playtime. At the actual stage it is completely broken. Don't buy it, unless they release some really big patches! But at the moment this game is just another example, how greedy the publishers (in this case Ubisoft) are. They just had $-signs in their eyes, so they had to release the game before christmas. With maybe only one or two months more time for the developers, this game could have been so great.

    Summary: The gameplay itself is pretty good.

    BUT: The amount of content is very weak for a full price title and matchmaking + stability can only be described as an catastrophe! In my opinion it is just dishonorable for a big publisher like Ubisoft to release a game in such a horrible condition!
    Expand
  100. Jan 9, 2016
    0
    Absolute waste of money. 2 months into the game's launch, they managed to completely mess up the netcode even more than it was before, ignoring the fact that the matchmaking is completely broken now for teams.
Metascore
79

Generally favorable reviews - based on 37 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 29 out of 37
  2. Negative: 0 out of 37
  1. Pelit (Finland)
    Mar 3, 2016
    86
    An excellent and innovative breath of fresh air. The more I play, the more I like. I hope this is new role model for shooters to come. [Jan 2016]
  2. CD-Action
    Feb 4, 2016
    70
    Siege’s multiplayer mode with its hectic pace and unpredictability seems to have a huge e-sport potential but with random teammates is often unplayable. [01/2016, p.52]
  3. Game World Navigator Magazine
    Jan 20, 2016
    80
    Unfortunately, there aren’t that many maps available, but each one of them has lots of details and alternate routes, like basements and balconies. Even the airplane is much more complex than the archetypical “long tube with seats.” [Issue#205, p.48]