User Score
7.5

Generally favorable reviews- based on 335 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Negative: 55 out of 335

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. Oct 2, 2015
    5
    Just finished playing this... it's very personal. Without spoiling it, my biggest problem with this game is that it isn't free. I know, it's a strange complaint, but the developer clearly states the purpose of this game towards the end and with it in mind, making a profit off this game is very insincere.

    EDIT: Just realised that I seemed to have missed the point of the game. However,
    Just finished playing this... it's very personal. Without spoiling it, my biggest problem with this game is that it isn't free. I know, it's a strange complaint, but the developer clearly states the purpose of this game towards the end and with it in mind, making a profit off this game is very insincere.

    EDIT: Just realised that I seemed to have missed the point of the game. However, regardless of whether the story is real or not, its exploitative (one way financially and the other emotionally) and thus I cannot recommend it. The developer of The Stanley Parable really dropped the ball on this one.
    Expand
  2. Oct 1, 2015
    3
    What a waste of $8 (and this is the on-sale price!) and time out of my life. The game is worse than the trash games within the game.

    Here's what the game is: Davey Wreden, creator of The Stanley Parable, makes you walk through a bunch of garbage, throw-away games one of his friends supposedly made with the Source engine while he pretentiously overanalyzes everything in them. His friend
    What a waste of $8 (and this is the on-sale price!) and time out of my life. The game is worse than the trash games within the game.

    Here's what the game is: Davey Wreden, creator of The Stanley Parable, makes you walk through a bunch of garbage, throw-away games one of his friends supposedly made with the Source engine while he pretentiously overanalyzes everything in them. His friend never published these games because they are, in fact, trash, throw-away "games" he made using the Source engine.

    No Davey, there aren't boxes in the sky of your friend's garbage Couter-Strike map because they are supposed to represent the fragmentation of his metaphysical superego. They're there because he was just messing around with the editor and randomly put ridiculous objects all over the place.

    And no Davey, the games aren't unfinishable because they represent the inconquerability of life. They're unfinishable because they're garbage, throw-away works he didn't care to finish or never got around to finishing.

    Makes me question if The Stanley Parable was even as good of a game as I thought it was.
    Expand
Metascore
76

Generally favorable reviews - based on 35 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 24 out of 35
  2. Negative: 4 out of 35
  1. Feb 10, 2016
    90
    The Beginner's Guide is an incredible art piece of a game that gets you thinking your relationship with the games you play.
  2. CD-Action
    Feb 4, 2016
    30
    Instead of engaging interactions, great animations or wonderfully crafted characters The Beginner’s Guide offers empty, amateurish, uninteresting environments and a story about two immature game developers. [01/2016, p.54]
  3. Power Unlimited
    Dec 10, 2015
    88
    The Beginner’s Guide is as fascinating as The Stanley Parable is hilarious. One of the most intriguing ‘games’ that we’ve played in recent history and an easy recommendation for everyone who likes weird game experiments. [dec. 2015 / page 062]