User Score
Generally favorable reviews- based on 350 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 280 out of 350
-
Mixed: 37 out of 350
-
Negative: 33 out of 350
Buy Now
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
MontyFeb 20, 2007
-
-
MichaelH.May 3, 2007
-
-
RobertR.Mar 14, 2007This is what RTS is all about: hundreds of units per side, massive maps, devastating weapons and endless action. Best game I've played for years!
-
-
XenoisMar 1, 2007
-
-
MarkI.Aug 29, 2007
-
-
SteveL.Jan 18, 2007I love this game.
-
-
BrandonJ.Feb 13, 2007If you bother to post, make sure it has absolutely nothing to do with the performance, because that's YOUR fault, not the game's.
-
-
MikkoM.Feb 14, 2007Really cool trategy game and a worthy successor to Total Anhilation.
-
-
MoritzV.Feb 21, 2007
-
-
ARealRTSFanFeb 21, 2007A nice change of pace from the other Real-time strategy games out there. It
-
-
MagnusFeb 20, 2007
-
-
MikeG.Feb 27, 2007
-
-
JohnJ.Feb 27, 2007
-
-
ChrisZ.Feb 27, 2007
-
-
StevW.Feb 9, 2007Excellent zoom system, makes everything very easy. Many innovations, hugescale combat. incredible. Easy to learn, and very smooth even on fairly low-end computers as long as you have a dual-core processor and enough RAM for the gametype you're playing.
-
-
ConstatineC.Mar 14, 2007This game is really the next revolution in RTS, CNC3 is going down as its just a rehash, EA's specialty.
-
-
DavidL.Mar 18, 2007This is to everybody that gave this game a 0 - get a better computer! You just have sour grapes because your hardware sucks - get over it, and get over yourselves.......It is by far the best rts game to come out, period.
-
-
ChrisC.Mar 23, 2007
-
-
RobertW.May 24, 2007
-
-
LucianGFeb 16, 2009
-
-
KilltacularDec 30, 2007
-
-
AndrewP.Feb 14, 2007I think the Australian GamePro bunch should re test Supreme Commander. Seems like they are the only ones with performance issues. Maybe they should pull their head out and realize ther may have been a problem with the system they tested on. If you ask me they had nothing but the intention of giving Sup Com a bad score anyway.
-
-
TheCaptainMar 18, 2007
-
-
AJMar 28, 2007Awesome, any magnitude of the whole battlefield in your view with just the use of scroll! Graphics next gen stunning, it IS the next evolution in RTS; proving to be a true incarnate of Total Annihilation.
-
-
Alpha352N/AMay 19, 2007It simply cannot be beat. The spiritual successor to Total Annihilation. While the game is tough on resources, it is designed for modern computers similarly to how TA was.
-
-
Oct 3, 2010Almost the perfect RTS. Strategy, tactics, music, atmosphere, graphics, sound, mega-armies, superrobots, all there. Hundred-thousands of skirmish units have already exploded on my screen. It takes weeks to master, but when you do, it's worth every second. Even the atrocious campaigns with the moronic game-characters will not drag my rating down from 10.
-
Aug 27, 2013
-
May 31, 2011
-
Jun 9, 2011
-
May 29, 2012
Awards & Rankings
-
PC Gamer UKA remarkable piece of work, and a worthy successor to "Total Annihilation." Strategy games don't come this big, and this ambitious, and they never demand this much from you. Take command - if you think you can handle it. [Feb 2007, p.62]
-
PC GamerThis is all-out war on a scale we've never seen before, and it is glorious. [Mar 2007, p.23]
-
Sup Com is very much a PC gamer's beast, and the supernova-sized war games may prove a little too demanding for anyone other than accomplished RTS players (our heads still hurt from the last LAN skirmish). If only for its sheer scale and battle mechanics, this should be sampled by every RTS fan with a graphics card - and indeed, mental powers - that are up to the task.