- Publisher: Iceberg Interactive
- Release Date: Apr 26, 2013
User Score
Mixed or average reviews- based on 385 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 221 out of 385
-
Mixed: 75 out of 385
-
Negative: 89 out of 385
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
May 23, 2016
-
Mar 7, 2016Not a finished game and the developer will never fix it. Tries to be MOO2 and fails at it.
You're better off getting the 2nd game. Which comes closer, but still no cigar. -
Jul 17, 2015
-
May 19, 2015
-
Jan 16, 2015I once gave this game an '8'...
But then, I never foresaw that the developer would just abandon it and leave it rotting while he uses the money he earned to create a 'sequel'...
Simply put, avoid due to the developer. -
Jan 12, 2015
-
Jan 10, 2015
-
Aug 29, 2014This game could have been awesome. Instead, the developer half-baked this game, took the money and ran off to build a sequel with even less content. The game remains unoptimized for even the best computers, has numerous computer-crashing bugs/glitches, and an unfinished quest line.
Like many early access games, this one failed to deliver what it promised. -
Jul 31, 2014
-
Jun 29, 2014
-
Jun 29, 2014
-
Jun 27, 2014
-
Jun 9, 2014
-
Apr 29, 2014
-
Feb 6, 2014
-
Jan 23, 2014I didn't give it 10 because it is perfect. Or because it is amazingly re-playable. But because for the first hundred hours it is perfectly flawed.
Ship building is fantastic, battles are fantastic, Ai is flawed although well thought out and the levels are interesting enough to give you a different experience depending on who you spawn near.
A perfect 100 hour game. -
Jan 19, 2014
-
Jan 10, 2014
-
Dec 23, 2013
-
Dec 23, 2013It is truly unbelievable what one man can achieve. The game is addictive right from start, well presented and is a lot of fun to play. There are still a few glitches and some potential for improvement, but Zero is putting amazing effort into this project releasing improvments almost on a daily basis. If you like 4x games, you have to grab this one!
-
Dec 20, 2013This is a game that I really wanted to be good. It has a lot of good features but the bugs make it almost impossible to enjoy. The game lag gets so bad towards end game it becomes unplayable. Game ending crashing if battles get to big. This is not a finished product.
-
Dec 9, 2013This game had potential but the end game gets boring and there must be some memory problems because my new laptop can hardly run it near the end of the game. This game should be listed as an early release. However, it appears the developer abandoned it after promising for months to keep working on the game.
-
Nov 1, 2013
-
Oct 25, 2013
-
Oct 11, 2013Game is incomplete, and the developer has said he's spending most of his time porting the game over to a new project based on the game that buyers of this one would have to pay again for. DO NOT BUY. It's a sad case of an indie developer taking the money, calling the game "complete" and running.
-
Oct 10, 2013
-
Oct 9, 2013
-
Oct 8, 2013Is this Master of Orion 2? Not quite. However, it is very much its equal. Amazingly well done indie title. Moo2 still has many bugs that require a player work around. This title may have bugs but they are getting fixed, something you won't see with Moo2.
-
Sep 27, 2013
-
Sep 26, 2013
Awards & Rankings
-
CD-ActionFeb 10, 2014If you like games in the vein of Stars! or Master of Orion, you can sink into Stardrive for long hours. [02/2014, p.73]
-
Dec 9, 2013Zero Sum Games has created a worthy addition to the 4X genre. What is more - modders are already creating more and more cool modifications for StarDrive. Ergonomics and gameplay rules should be more user-friendly, but the game itself is far from boring or tiresome. 4X fans will be pleased.
-
LEVEL (Czech Republic)Sep 19, 2013For your first and second time, StarDrive brings a refreshing experience resembling Master of Orion. However, as soon as you understand its basic rules, the game is gone like through a Black Hole. [Issue#232]