Starcraft II: Wings of Liberty

 PC
User Score
8.2

Generally favorable reviews- based on 3772 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2,975 out of 3772
  2. Mixed: 410 out of 3772
  3. Negative: 387 out of 3772
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. AustinS.
    Aug 2, 2010
    10
    Firstly, all the people giving out the common complaints, no LAN, one campaign, $60, etc. are idiots, plain and simply. LAN only enables people to play without paying, thus rendering a lower profit and lower incentive to make the game. Yes, it's one campaign, but it's a full game's worth. You have to be a complete moron to think that Blizzard would put out 1/3 of a game. Firstly, all the people giving out the common complaints, no LAN, one campaign, $60, etc. are idiots, plain and simply. LAN only enables people to play without paying, thus rendering a lower profit and lower incentive to make the game. Yes, it's one campaign, but it's a full game's worth. You have to be a complete moron to think that Blizzard would put out 1/3 of a game. They are putting out three games, all with full and entertaining campaigns. On the $60 price point, games have cost $50 for over a decade; since then, the production cost has increased, and the value of the dollar has decreased. $60 now is less than $50 was when games started charging $50.… Expand
  2. Derek
    Aug 2, 2010
    8
    Felt that the game lost some of it's draw over the decade in-between sequels. A lot has happened since then, making it tough to go back and play an old school RTS without some disappointment. The game does what it wants to do with excellence, but falls short of the greatness that the original achieved.
  3. MartinP
    Aug 2, 2010
    10
    I'd rather give this game 100 points out of 10 for reasons I'll come back to after my review. My review can be short, enough people already said it: - The game still has the exact same base principles which made it the best RTS of all times back in 98. - I personally believe the game has even better controls - The challenges and achievements just work really good - The campaign I'd rather give this game 100 points out of 10 for reasons I'll come back to after my review. My review can be short, enough people already said it: - The game still has the exact same base principles which made it the best RTS of all times back in 98. - I personally believe the game has even better controls - The challenges and achievements just work really good - The campaign has an epic story so far (saying otherwise makes me believe you didn't pay attention to it or haven't played the campaign yet). Brilliant CGI to support it too! - Addition of specialization trough research and improvement through hiring mercenaries and buying better hardware work great too. These are the reasons I'd give this game a 10. But I would like to give that score 9 times more to make a 100 out of ten just because I read reviews like: - "People beat me big time in multi-player, lame: score = 1" -- If you can't play it's your problem, don't blame the game for it... - "It's an ok game, but not the best ever. Score: 1" -- So you give good games a score of 1? You mean you want to give it a 5 or 6 but because so many people do like the game you feel like giving it a 1 so the game will get a lower score just like it should have in YOUR eyes? - "Too expensive, especially for only one campaign. Score: 0" -- You get allot more in this game than you'll get in most other games. It's well worth the price. Also only stating the high price and giving 0 points means the same as thinking every other aspect of the game you can think of is just fine but doesn't earn points for the game. Just a couple of reviews I can really get agitated about and made me want to rant. Reviews are opinions, but if you scale the score of your review down (or up like I'd really like to do here since it feels like I need to) your trying to shape the average opinion towards yours instead of generating a fair average opinion.… Expand
  4. Anon4800
    Aug 2, 2010
    10
    A genius game, best RTS for a long time. If there is supposed to be a minus is that I will have a lack of sleep I belive :P Great graphic, great gameplay, amazing music, amazing story.
  5. MichaelT.
    Aug 2, 2010
    10
    An absolute must have for any gamer. The story is epic in scale. Even if you don't enjoy RTS games, this may be the one game that changes your mind. Blizzard has once again delivered, and I will be looking forward to the next two entries.
  6. AndreasG
    Aug 2, 2010
    10
    StarCraft 2 builds on the strenght of the core gameplay experience that made games such as SC1 and WC3 top RTS games. Solid strategy, balancing of units and level design have always been Blizzards forte along with engaging story line and mouthwatering cinematics. But this game has so many additional layers on top of the usual features. The hub between missions is spectacular, offering StarCraft 2 builds on the strenght of the core gameplay experience that made games such as SC1 and WC3 top RTS games. Solid strategy, balancing of units and level design have always been Blizzards forte along with engaging story line and mouthwatering cinematics. But this game has so many additional layers on top of the usual features. The hub between missions is spectacular, offering permanent unit upgrades and research options as well as additional story elements. Value for money is excpetional.… Expand
  7. ChrisR
    Aug 2, 2010
    10
    The game is so massive and deep that it will take most players months to wade through all the content. The wait was well worth it judging by the polish of the final product. The three races are well balanced, each having their relative strengths and weaknesses. Online play is more fun than ever! I've had many games where my starting base gets wiped out, but I have an expo that I can The game is so massive and deep that it will take most players months to wade through all the content. The wait was well worth it judging by the polish of the final product. The three races are well balanced, each having their relative strengths and weaknesses. Online play is more fun than ever! I've had many games where my starting base gets wiped out, but I have an expo that I can turn into a main. "Hell, its about time."… Expand
  8. NickJ
    Aug 3, 2010
    10
    Okay. I'm getting a bit sick of complaints...So rather than give a true review, I'm going to just address them all. 1) No LAN: Who cares? Who uses LAN anymore? I don't know anyone that does, honestly, and almost all my friends are gamers. 2) Battle.Net: Okay, yeah. It's a bit silly needing to always be connected, but they do have the guest account. You just can't Okay. I'm getting a bit sick of complaints...So rather than give a true review, I'm going to just address them all. 1) No LAN: Who cares? Who uses LAN anymore? I don't know anyone that does, honestly, and almost all my friends are gamers. 2) Battle.Net: Okay, yeah. It's a bit silly needing to always be connected, but they do have the guest account. You just can't earn achievements when playing it, but it does allow you to play offline. But still, if you (like me) have a dedicated internet connection (I'm a WoW player after all), then it's not a problem. I happen to like BNET and all its features, except for Real ID, which is easily turned off through parental controls. 3) Only One Campaign: There's only one campaign, but it's the size of all three campaigns from SC1 put together. 30 missions. 4) Unbalanced Units: I played the beta and it's one of the most balanced games in multiplayer I have played in a looong time. I just suck at it. 5) Graphics Are Choppy: I played on high settings (with most on ultra) and I play on a laptop. It ran really smoothly, probably around 30 FPS. If you're looking to get 60, then yeah, you might not be able to, but when the human eye only detects 26, why bother with more than 30?… Expand
  9. LarryF
    Jul 28, 2010
    8
    A few nice features but overall the single player was underwhelming. The script felt lacking in places and in others thrown together, some voice acting wasn't on par with what I was expecting from a game developed by Blizzard, not to mention all the sub-plots just seemed tacked on with no real dept. Also, the game as a whole felt like it was taking me by the hand, step-by-step, A few nice features but overall the single player was underwhelming. The script felt lacking in places and in others thrown together, some voice acting wasn't on par with what I was expecting from a game developed by Blizzard, not to mention all the sub-plots just seemed tacked on with no real dept. Also, the game as a whole felt like it was taking me by the hand, step-by-step, leaving little to the imagination. Even parts in the campaign made me feel like the game was made with eight year olds in mind where the protagonist(Jim Raynor) would repeat what objective he had to do and exactly how he was going to do it. Great animations, great quality overall but, again, the single player could have had more of a story to tell and felt more "epic", more "complete" without tacked on side quests with no real value other than to contribute to gimmicks such as aquiring cash for armour or new units. I'm hopeful the community will put together some good custom maps ala WarCraft III in due time, however. Single Player gets an 8/10 from me. Story just wasn't all that and some parts simply felt thrown together. Multiplayer, in time, should prove to be a good experience but i'm not liking the popularity listings of custom maps. Honestly, if you want to play it for custom maps stick with WarCraft III for now, if the SC2 competitive RTS is what you're realling looking into then go for it(WC3 and SC are very different). Again, single player could have been better.… Expand
  10. JoeM
    Jul 28, 2010
    9
    Lake of LAN play, no new race, and no Zerg or Protoss campaign bring the score from a 10 down to a 9. However I didn't know it was possible but they took the original Starcraft and made it MORE fun to play. The game is VERY fun. Lots of new units and strats. People that rate the game low are just bitchy because they have slow computers or think the few problems I mentioned above Lake of LAN play, no new race, and no Zerg or Protoss campaign bring the score from a 10 down to a 9. However I didn't know it was possible but they took the original Starcraft and made it MORE fun to play. The game is VERY fun. Lots of new units and strats. People that rate the game low are just bitchy because they have slow computers or think the few problems I mentioned above should drag the score down more.… Expand
  11. JustinG
    Jul 28, 2010
    9
    The game is every bit worth they hype and although some elements are missing that you might know from other RTS games, it brings a fresh revitalized feel to the whole RTS genre and it is true to Starcraft. You have to have a really great state of the art video card to play the game at the highest resolution and detailed settings, it also takes 12GB of install space.
  12. JensJ
    Jul 28, 2010
    8
    While this game certainly is well made, I still can't understand why it took so long to make. There really is no big difference between the old StarCraft and the new StarCraft. Graphics is better, there is a new storyline with beautyful cutscenes, but still the gameplay is exactly the same as the first one. Not much new has been added and that is why I can't give this more than an 8.
  13. PelleS
    Jul 28, 2010
    9
    Solid, quality next-gen Starcraft. Tactics are solidly upgraded over the first version (i.e zerging isn't rewarded as much as before), it looks beautiful, and remains as intense and well-balanced as ever. For all those whining about frame rates and graphics...get a computer that doesn't suck.
  14. LoganR
    Jul 28, 2010
    9
    Let me say right off the bat that I'd been one of the many beta testers for this game. As such, I've made myself very familiar with the game's balance and design decisions, so I know what will be in the game in future patches and what won't make it. I'm suprised at the few hyperbolic low scores here... the game has been out for one day, and some of the problems Let me say right off the bat that I'd been one of the many beta testers for this game. As such, I've made myself very familiar with the game's balance and design decisions, so I know what will be in the game in future patches and what won't make it. I'm suprised at the few hyperbolic low scores here... the game has been out for one day, and some of the problems are on the user end, it seems. Additionally, people seem to think that this is 1/3 of a game... however, the campaign is just as long as that of a full game, and is much more robust than the original and most other current gen strategy games. Rest assured that it is not short on content. This is a fun game, and a challenging one at that. Some people might feel that Blizzard didn't depart from the original enough, but this is intentional (i.e. don't break what isn't broken and don't alienate the eSports community). The current level of balance between the races is good, but Zerg are a little under the weather (though my favorite). Chat channels and clans are coming, so don't fret too much about their current absence. Keep in mind that most games (PC) ship with many bugs and balance issues to work out, especially one with so much weight in multiplayer. The first Starcraft was no different, and was relatively light on graphics cards and servers. Give this game a month or two and it will be at full force. Until then, enjoy a very good game.… Expand
  15. DaveC
    Jul 28, 2010
    8
    Love the graphics. The plot is interesting enough to keep me playing. The missions are split in such a way that I can play one or two, and feel like I accomplished something, while also knowing there's a long way to go. Unit and Tech upgrades are a nice addition that allows you to cater to you playstyle. Multi matchmaking is quick and painless. Achievements are a great addition that Love the graphics. The plot is interesting enough to keep me playing. The missions are split in such a way that I can play one or two, and feel like I accomplished something, while also knowing there's a long way to go. Unit and Tech upgrades are a nice addition that allows you to cater to you playstyle. Multi matchmaking is quick and painless. Achievements are a great addition that makes you pay attenion to details you might otherwise ignore. Autosave is intelligent, and the interface is beautifully polished. Only a couple of complaints. I don't feel like I'm playing a new game much as replaying something I've beat before. I guess that's one way to create a sequel, and it was probably the safest path for Blizz, but I was hoping for a bit more innovation. Rumor has it that each races single player campaign will be sold seperately? I'm not sure I believe it, but that would fall in line with past decisions by Blizz, and the general trend of the modern market. Shipping without campaigns for multiple races lost it a point though. Last complaint is mostly concern about multiplayer micro. Either you've mastered it, or you lose. That's it. It's razor-fine balance that makes multi unenjoyable for casuals. Overall, worth $50. $60 seems a bit much, but I bought it so it must be close.… Expand
  16. IanH
    Jul 28, 2010
    8
    Well looks like im going against the grain, i dont think its either perfect (score of 10) or worthless (score of 0). Its a very polished RTS, if you didnt like starcraft 1, you wont like this one either. Its bascially the same game. Its an 'old-fashioned' RTS in the same vein as command and conquer. Nothing wrong with that, but dont expect anything different, like the cover Well looks like im going against the grain, i dont think its either perfect (score of 10) or worthless (score of 0). Its a very polished RTS, if you didnt like starcraft 1, you wont like this one either. Its bascially the same game. Its an 'old-fashioned' RTS in the same vein as command and conquer. Nothing wrong with that, but dont expect anything different, like the cover system in Company of Heroes, or the trading system in Battleforge etc. This is a traditional very polished RTS. Multiplayer seems stable, the single player story line is excellent. But as an overall game there are better RTS's in my opinion.… Expand
  17. DavidD.
    Jul 29, 2010
    10
    Amazing game. Campaign was hard but awesome and you can play with countless other people online based on your skill level. Not to mention, you have years of replay value due to custom games. My only complaint is that there's no chatrooms, but that's okay.
  18. AlexL
    Jul 29, 2010
    10
    To Gary K from the love of God upgrade your video card ! Game is simply amazing, on the negative note I waited so long for this sequel that my reflexes are not what they used to be
  19. MarcG.
    Jul 29, 2010
    10
    Incredible game. I have been waiting for this for 12 years and now being through the campaign I can safely say it has been worth the wait! Best of the Starcraft Single Player stories and online is pretty fun too.
  20. DanB
    Jul 29, 2010
    10
    Absolutely fantastic! Multiplayer will keep me coming back for quite some time, and the single player is leaps and bounds better than any RTS I've ever played.
  21. ArthurI
    Jul 29, 2010
    10
    I've waited 4,502 days for this RTS game from Blizzard to come out. I've bought a new computer just to enjoy it in its full glory. I've played thousands in the first game and hundreds in the beta to prepare for this mammoth of a title. Well, I'm more than glad to say that not only has StarCraft 2 match the hype that it has been given, but it surpasses it to levels I've waited 4,502 days for this RTS game from Blizzard to come out. I've bought a new computer just to enjoy it in its full glory. I've played thousands in the first game and hundreds in the beta to prepare for this mammoth of a title. Well, I'm more than glad to say that not only has StarCraft 2 match the hype that it has been given, but it surpasses it to levels unknown. There are so few games nowadays that take us back to our childhood bliss, so few that make us want to take a day off work just to enjoy. Starcraft 2 is that game.… Expand
  22. ChrisK
    Jul 29, 2010
    10
    So far, this game fantastic. I rarely (and I mean very rarely) play RTS because there hasn't been a real classic RTS with a really distinct set of characters, races, and not to mention the ludicrous amount of content that the game offers. IM sort of new to the Starcraft universe, so playing this is really a treat. Fantastic graphics, great story, amazing set pieces (with such detail So far, this game fantastic. I rarely (and I mean very rarely) play RTS because there hasn't been a real classic RTS with a really distinct set of characters, races, and not to mention the ludicrous amount of content that the game offers. IM sort of new to the Starcraft universe, so playing this is really a treat. Fantastic graphics, great story, amazing set pieces (with such detail in the environments and everything else, it is quite astounding), this game is definitely a GOTY contender. I'm bought the game for campaign, and am loving it. Totally worth the purchase, and the fact that there is no subscription fee is totally awesome! Starcraft 2, so far in my opinion, is probably the best game I have ever played on a PC (I'm actually on Mac, and it works and plays just as good). It is definitely a very pleasant surprise and I highly recommend it. And just FYI Gary, make sure you tone down the settings. All computers can't handle Ultra settings.… Expand
  23. BrianI.
    Jul 29, 2010
    10
    Most of the 0's are because peoples computers suck, or they don't have good internet, its like saying Ferrari's suck because the roads around here aren't developed. Sucks for you, but don't give a 10 game 0's because of it.
  24. BradS
    Jul 29, 2010
    10
    I find it hilarious that so many people are giving this game a 0 out of shear spite. All the "problems" that most people have with this game could be solved by upgrading their computers. We knew there would be no LAN and no cross-realm months ago. And, they'll probably add cross-realm features sometime in the near future. The single player is a glorious and challenging and stunning I find it hilarious that so many people are giving this game a 0 out of shear spite. All the "problems" that most people have with this game could be solved by upgrading their computers. We knew there would be no LAN and no cross-realm months ago. And, they'll probably add cross-realm features sometime in the near future. The single player is a glorious and challenging and stunning experience (play it on Brutal), and the multiplayer is as deep and intriguing as SC1. People who say multi is micro-oriented must really suck at the game, it's still a macro game at heart just like SC1. The improvements on the UI are everything we could have asked for with multiple building selection, worker rally straight to minerals, infinite unit selection, and improved hotkey locations. You no longer have to have 300 actions per minute if you want to be competitive. I hope this game brings e-sports to the US. It's the perfect game to do it.… Expand
  25. EsbenC.
    Jul 29, 2010
    10
    By far the best game I have yet played, the campaign is amazing and so is the multiplayer part. There is almost perfect balance on the first day of the release with no tactics being lame (meaning that every tactic can be beat if you spot it and counter it) This game is severely underpriced for the great job Blizzard have done with it.
  26. JesseC
    Jul 29, 2010
    10
    I am not a huge fan of the first starcraft and I only played it a little bit so I wasnt even going to buy the SC2 at first. I thought the first one was boring and I assumed SC2 was just going to be some pushover 5 hour long campaign mode and online multiplayer mode. Now having put 10 hours or so in single player and messed around in multiplayer I am in love. In campaign, I thought the I am not a huge fan of the first starcraft and I only played it a little bit so I wasnt even going to buy the SC2 at first. I thought the first one was boring and I assumed SC2 was just going to be some pushover 5 hour long campaign mode and online multiplayer mode. Now having put 10 hours or so in single player and messed around in multiplayer I am in love. In campaign, I thought the missions were going to be repetitive and have you play a CPU opponent much like you do in multiplayer for each mission. The missions are a variety of different scenarios and objectives all based around the storyline. In between missions you will be on your spaceship, able to interact with fellow shipmates, buy upgrades for your soldiers, buy contracts with mercenaries, upgrade tech/science, and even play arcade games! Multiplayer is as advertised, only with much more depth and tactics involved. This game deserves nothing less than a 10… Expand
  27. JosiahA
    Jul 29, 2010
    10
    Amazing start to the trilogy. Empahsis on the word trilogy. Many people complain because the game is not "complete." Actually, the game is quite complete they realease the entire Terran campaign as they said they would. As was stated before, they forumla did not change much, but it did not need to. It is an instant classic and nominee for game of the year in my book.
  28. JosephW
    Jul 29, 2010
    10
    So far the campaign is phenomenal. The way they tell the story and how you interact with the characters and environments is totally unique and a breath of fresh air. The campaign is immersive and is not just a tutorial for the multiplayer. The challenge maps are helpful to beginners and advanced users alike, but also are a lot of fun and adds to the value of the game. This game is So far the campaign is phenomenal. The way they tell the story and how you interact with the characters and environments is totally unique and a breath of fresh air. The campaign is immersive and is not just a tutorial for the multiplayer. The challenge maps are helpful to beginners and advanced users alike, but also are a lot of fun and adds to the value of the game. This game is everything a Blizzard fan would want in a Starcraft game, I can't wait to see what they do with the Protoss and Zerg campaigns.… Expand
  29. JonathanK.
    Jul 29, 2010
    10
    One of, if not the best strategy games of all time. Everything about this game has been refined and polished down to the last pixel. Even though this is just the first installment in a series of three, there's enough content to keep you entertained for hundreds of hours, easily. From the robust story missions, to the challenge missions, online ladder, and endless amounts of user One of, if not the best strategy games of all time. Everything about this game has been refined and polished down to the last pixel. Even though this is just the first installment in a series of three, there's enough content to keep you entertained for hundreds of hours, easily. From the robust story missions, to the challenge missions, online ladder, and endless amounts of user generates maps, this game is well worth the investment. Long time fans of starcraft or the RTS genre in general will not be disappointed with this spectacular offering. Even if you didn't play the first starcraft, really don't let this one pass you by. There's something here for everyone.… Expand
  30. HansM
    Jul 29, 2010
    10
    Pretty much the best RTS I've played. My pc is not the best, but I can run it on ultra graphics with no FPS problems, and the gameplay is magnifique. One of the best campaigns I've played, and the achievements and challenges makes it more interesting. Anyone who says different are basically stupid.
  31. RyanC
    Jul 29, 2010
    10
    I've taken bits of everything the game has had to offer, from the full campaign, the challenge modes, the customs maps, the ladder system, the ai skirmishes, and the messing with the editor itself. This game deserves a 10 for sure from my experiences. What culminates a s story far more enriched and longer than the previous starcraft campaign even in the terran scenario. A lot has I've taken bits of everything the game has had to offer, from the full campaign, the challenge modes, the customs maps, the ladder system, the ai skirmishes, and the messing with the editor itself. This game deserves a 10 for sure from my experiences. What culminates a s story far more enriched and longer than the previous starcraft campaign even in the terran scenario. A lot has been attested to whether the sequel could hold up to the original in it's strength, I have no doubts in my mind that has surpassed such expectations.… Expand
  32. StefanB
    Jul 29, 2010
    10
    It has everything I expect from an RTS: a single-player campaign with a large number of challenging missions that are surprisingly varied, great game-play, a solid story and base-building. It is well-polished and keeps me up until late in the night, which few other games do these days. I paid A$69, which is about the same, or actually less than other new PC games in Australia, so I It has everything I expect from an RTS: a single-player campaign with a large number of challenging missions that are surprisingly varied, great game-play, a solid story and base-building. It is well-polished and keeps me up until late in the night, which few other games do these days. I paid A$69, which is about the same, or actually less than other new PC games in Australia, so I can't even complain about the price. Instead of 9 Human, 9 Zerg and 9 Protoss missions in the one game, you get 27 Human missions and the other campaigns in the expansions. So it is not less of a game. It is just a different way of doing things. For the sake of the story, it probably works out better this way.… Expand
  33. ShaneB
    Jul 29, 2010
    8
    Fantastic game, great single player campaign and excellent multiplayer gameplay. My only issue with the game is that it does feel incomplete once you beat the Terran Campaign. Blizzard should have waited to complete the entire game and it does feel like a money grab on their part.
  34. MikeD.
    Jul 29, 2010
    10
    WOW. This is one of the 5 best games I have ever played. If you loved the first Starcraft, get this game. If you like strategy games, get this game. Heck, even if you just enjoy videogames, get this game. You will not be dissapointed. Everything in this game is so perfectly crafted and balanced that I simply can't get enough of the best multiplayer game of all time. Yes, I said it. WOW. This is one of the 5 best games I have ever played. If you loved the first Starcraft, get this game. If you like strategy games, get this game. Heck, even if you just enjoy videogames, get this game. You will not be dissapointed. Everything in this game is so perfectly crafted and balanced that I simply can't get enough of the best multiplayer game of all time. Yes, I said it. This tore me away from both WoW, and MW2. The single player campaign is also great, with great cinematics and awesome gameplay, but nothing will ever beat the multiplayer mode. Game of the year here!… Expand
  35. JerryL
    Jul 31, 2010
    10
    Don't listen to the haters. Worth every penny The missions are detailed, interesting, and as difficult as you want to make them. The achievement system is challenging and drives you to jump in and explore the whole new system and world Blizzard has created. It has expanded from just building up an army and blowing things up, to following story lines, choosing your missions and Don't listen to the haters. Worth every penny The missions are detailed, interesting, and as difficult as you want to make them. The achievement system is challenging and drives you to jump in and explore the whole new system and world Blizzard has created. It has expanded from just building up an army and blowing things up, to following story lines, choosing your missions and unit/tech advancement that make the campaign a totally different experience than the multiplayer. Speaking of the multiplayer, the new [...] is incredible. The matching engine has been phenomenal. For me at least, it always finds a challenging yet equal leveled player. Even when you lose you think, "had I just done a couple things differently I could have won." Those kinds of experiences are great for learning and as you play you get better and try out and see different techniques. The leagues and ladder system is an incentive to play and get better and is fun to watch yourself climb the latter and join higher leagues. I love to view and compare my opponent's statistics and see their achievements. The built in replay system is another major improvement. It's extremely helpful to have replays of all your matches and be able to review them to study the timing and tactics. The changes in [...] would have been worth the $60 alone. I've only heard 3 complaints: no LAN, lack of chat rooms (there are lots of personal and party chat features), and the game feels incomplete without equal campaigns for Zerg and Protoss. How many LAN games have you played in the last 5 years where you didn't have access to the internet? I can personally think of 3 and when you recognize the benefits of having everything connected to an online system that tradeoff isn't even a question. To invest tons of more time and effort into supporting that you lose time and energy to put into the game details itself. I say leave it out. 2. Lack of chat room in [...]. I personally found the chat rooms to be annoying, but others liked them, I'd be willing to bet it gets a patch to include them before years end. The last item is one I read a lot about and can't understand and that's people feel somehow ripped off by not having the other 2 campaigns. It's simple there is enough material and experience in this one game than both SC and Brood Wars combined. We have no idea what Blizzard is going to release with the next 2 games, I'm confident though that if it's the same cost, they will include enough to make it worth it, if they don't, it won't cost as much as the current one does. I don't think even Blizzard knows how much it's going to cost or include. So why freak out about it now? Bottom line, the campaign is enough to cover a stand alone game. Expecting that kind of detail X3 would be like asking someone to build you a house and then ask if they can build it 3X larger for the same amount of time and money. When you figure people spend $10 for 2 hours at the movie theater, $60 is a small price to pay for the hours, days, and years of entertainment this game will offer. Worth every penny and I'm excited to see what Blizzard has up their sleeve for the next 2 installments.… Expand
  36. JonL
    Jul 31, 2010
    10
    Definitely took everything from the first game and made it much better. The balance vital to multiplayer is still there. Granted, you only have a terran campaign, but it's just as long as the combined campaigns of the three races from SC1. Worth the money by far, and can't wait for the expansions!
  37. NicoS
    Jul 31, 2010
    10
    Simply a masterpiece and will start a revolution for casual RTS Games - just give it a month and most of the players are correctly rated. Then you will have mostly even matches only, already worked this in the beta. And the campain is absolutely awesome. Downside: got less sleep last few days.
  38. JonathanL
    Jul 31, 2010
    10
    Another excellent game from Blizzard, Starcraft II brings along a tour de force of gameplay, with excellent cutscenes, a wide variety of missions, and a gripping story line. The two more announced expansions only mean better things for the single player campaign, and nay-saying to the contrary, the new Battle.net remains an engaging and easy to use interface, making gaming online a breeze.
  39. TimD
    Jul 31, 2010
    10
    Anyone who rates this game lower than 9 clearly does not own it nor do they have any intention of every buying it. This game is fantastic, if you like strategy games, there is no reason not to buy this game.
  40. JoshN
    Jul 30, 2010
    8
    It's been roughly 10 years since the release of the original Starcraft, and since then, Blizzard has definitely took their time to create a magnificent game. That being said, the amount of effort they put into the game has definitely shown, however, there are still flaws. The multiplayer for Starcraft is the core of the game, and as usual, Blizzard has done a fantastic job on it, It's been roughly 10 years since the release of the original Starcraft, and since then, Blizzard has definitely took their time to create a magnificent game. That being said, the amount of effort they put into the game has definitely shown, however, there are still flaws. The multiplayer for Starcraft is the core of the game, and as usual, Blizzard has done a fantastic job on it, adding hundreds of hours on replay value. Though the game itself is good, it just isn't that magnificent as a whole. The lack of social communication between the Starcraft community is very lacking, given that there are no chatrooms, it is very difficult for others to interact with eachother. The single player itself is great, but that does not mean it does not need improvement. The missions are relatively similar, and is usually the same song and dance. Their attempt to use the in-game engine for the cinematics to replace the CGI was a terrible decision, and though it is not completely horrible - more could have been done to improve this aspect. Fans of the series will definitely enjoy this sequel , but will be dissappointed with the social aspect of the game.… Expand
  41. XahK
    Jul 30, 2010
    10
    I'll admit I played the beta so I have a advantage for atleast the first 10 to 15 games going into multiplayer. I honestly believe some of these 1 rating individuals are giving up before the placement matches are even done. Just keep at it, there are floods of people who play just like you. However if you don't improve your experience with multiplayer will be dull, largely I'll admit I played the beta so I have a advantage for atleast the first 10 to 15 games going into multiplayer. I honestly believe some of these 1 rating individuals are giving up before the placement matches are even done. Just keep at it, there are floods of people who play just like you. However if you don't improve your experience with multiplayer will be dull, largely because the quality of your opponents' is terrible. Do some research, go to teamliquid.com watch how some people play the game and you'll slowly approve. This is all coming from someone who started as copper/silver to diamond.… Expand
  42. AustinE.
    Jul 30, 2010
    10
    Fantastic game. I got it at midnight and have not been disappointed. Single player missions are varied and interesting, and the story (while nothing mindblowing) is entertaining. The multiplayer is where hundreds of hours are going to be spent. Balance is pretty good, but there are always patches for improvement. Between the campaign, multiplayer, the single player challenges, the Fantastic game. I got it at midnight and have not been disappointed. Single player missions are varied and interesting, and the story (while nothing mindblowing) is entertaining. The multiplayer is where hundreds of hours are going to be spent. Balance is pretty good, but there are always patches for improvement. Between the campaign, multiplayer, the single player challenges, the achievements and portraits to earn, the game is bursting with content and well worth the $60.… Expand
  43. SchlistaS
    Jul 30, 2010
    8
    This is the hardest game to review for me. It's a great great game; however, it really is just Starcraft reskinned. I loved starcraft, one of the best games ever made and deserves a 10. But this is just more of the same which isn't a bad thing, but I also loved crackdown and was a bit let down when crackdown 2 was pretty much more of the same. So from a review standpoint while This is the hardest game to review for me. It's a great great game; however, it really is just Starcraft reskinned. I loved starcraft, one of the best games ever made and deserves a 10. But this is just more of the same which isn't a bad thing, but I also loved crackdown and was a bit let down when crackdown 2 was pretty much more of the same. So from a review standpoint while Starcraft is a fantastic game it is pretty much Starcraft with 2008 graphics.… Expand
  44. JHumes
    Jul 30, 2010
    10
    Blizzard knows what works, and in Starcraft 2, it shows. The fact that the single player has many units that are not available in the multi-player for balance issues, highlights the great effort that Blizzard made to make the different races balanced. Once again, Blizzard has released a game that will addict millions of people for years to come.
  45. BoB
    Jul 31, 2010
    10
    The best game I've played to this date. Re-playability is the keyword here. Both multiplayer (mp) and singleplayer (sp) wise. Great core game mechanics make sure that foundation is solid to build the most epic game upon. SP has a great storyline and the achievements mixed with difficulty settings makes it worth replaying tons of times for me. MP has it all: clever rankings which The best game I've played to this date. Re-playability is the keyword here. Both multiplayer (mp) and singleplayer (sp) wise. Great core game mechanics make sure that foundation is solid to build the most epic game upon. SP has a great storyline and the achievements mixed with difficulty settings makes it worth replaying tons of times for me. MP has it all: clever rankings which enhances the online experience and gives me the incentive to become a better player. Custom games made possible by an awesome world editor, which makes sure that are always new playable challenges and makes the community thrive. 10/10… Expand
  46. TimothyJ
    Jul 31, 2010
    10
    The RTS game I've been waiting for since the Warcraft 2 / Startcraft / Red Alert days! Awesome campaign. Visually amazing. A soundtrack that retains elements from the original game while not being exactly the same. And a nice smooth transition into multi-player that even the noobest of noobs will be able to cope with.
  47. RubenD.
    Aug 1, 2010
    10
    After years waiting for this secuel, here it is an better than expected, with more ways to enjoy it than before. And in this years of action games and first person shooters, a bit of fresh air. New improved and revamp graphics. Excellent campaign modem, with a new Hub allowing you to get deeper in the story and also chose different upgrades and options for your army. The connection with After years waiting for this secuel, here it is an better than expected, with more ways to enjoy it than before. And in this years of action games and first person shooters, a bit of fresh air. New improved and revamp graphics. Excellent campaign modem, with a new Hub allowing you to get deeper in the story and also chose different upgrades and options for your army. The connection with facebook, means they are always near if you feel like playing. Blizzard has bring back good memories and improve them, when diablo 3 is out too, it will be like playing with my friends again at the beginning of the Milena.… Expand
  48. AgarwelI
    Aug 1, 2010
    8
    It is a very good game. But nothing more. Very similar to other RTS games and nothing more. So is it worth buying? Definetly? It is some extraordinary game that should be praised and call best game ever? Not at all. Release of this game is nothing more than release of Uncahrted2, Halo3, Deus Ex3 etc. Just another very good game. But there is like 10 of such games each year. So there is no It is a very good game. But nothing more. Very similar to other RTS games and nothing more. So is it worth buying? Definetly? It is some extraordinary game that should be praised and call best game ever? Not at all. Release of this game is nothing more than release of Uncahrted2, Halo3, Deus Ex3 etc. Just another very good game. But there is like 10 of such games each year. So there is no reason to make a special celebration for this one.… Expand
  49. ZaratanchoT.
    Aug 1, 2010
    10
    The game is amazing. And it will become even greater when all patches and expansions come out. Never played alot of RTS games but there are some that you just need to... and Starcraft is one of them.
  50. RobertP.
    Aug 1, 2010
    10
    At first I was discouraged when I heard StarCraft 2 was being divided into three games. However, Wings of Liberty stands on it's own two feet. An excellent story, good evolution of the RTS format and the best cinematics in gaming. Even if you never play online, the single player is well worth the price. I got the collectors editions and feel completely satisfied.
  51. Richard
    Aug 1, 2010
    10
    It may use the same game mechanics like starcraft but who wouldn't really want that. the king of RTS claim its rightful throne again with this game. extremely polished gameplay, unparralled RTS graphics, an absolutley amazing multiplayer experience. the new battle.net is well polished also tho the LAN problem is kinda of a downer. GREAT GAME.
  52. 'Airstrike'I
    Aug 1, 2010
    10
    While at first I was skeptical about the lack of LAN play, Protoss and Zerg campaigns and the requirement of internet connectivity, within minutes of starting it up for the first time I was hooked. The epic tournament-style play that made Starcraft what it is remains in the form of the new Battle.net, while the singleplayer campaign is incredibly immersive and fun by itself, with a lot While at first I was skeptical about the lack of LAN play, Protoss and Zerg campaigns and the requirement of internet connectivity, within minutes of starting it up for the first time I was hooked. The epic tournament-style play that made Starcraft what it is remains in the form of the new Battle.net, while the singleplayer campaign is incredibly immersive and fun by itself, with a lot more to do than "build, move, blow stuff up" 90% of the time.… Expand
  53. AndrewB
    Aug 2, 2010
    10
    Absolutely true to the original and polished to a mirror sheen. Definitely worth the money. Don't listen to the "It's only a third of a game" crowd. If they tried to squeeze the amount of content included in Wings of Liberty into one game, then it would fall short of magnificent and that's certainly not in Blizzard's reputation. Jackson broke up Lord of the Rings into Absolutely true to the original and polished to a mirror sheen. Definitely worth the money. Don't listen to the "It's only a third of a game" crowd. If they tried to squeeze the amount of content included in Wings of Liberty into one game, then it would fall short of magnificent and that's certainly not in Blizzard's reputation. Jackson broke up Lord of the Rings into three films for a reason, and Blizzard has done just the same.… Expand
  54. alexandreP
    Aug 2, 2010
    8
    Strip the cutscenes away and you have a kind of booring RTS in single player. Multi-player it's another thing, but playing the campaign it's not quite fun, it's ok but not what I expected.
  55. Jim
    Aug 2, 2010
    8
    I loved the original Starcraft, but seriously, fanboi hat off for this. Yes, it's an amazing game. Graphics are very good, system reqs reasonable, cinematics are incredible, multiplayer was beta tested to death (and boy does it show with the amazing balance of gameplay), and the Terran campaign is decent. It's more than just a new coat of paint on the old game, but you can see I loved the original Starcraft, but seriously, fanboi hat off for this. Yes, it's an amazing game. Graphics are very good, system reqs reasonable, cinematics are incredible, multiplayer was beta tested to death (and boy does it show with the amazing balance of gameplay), and the Terran campaign is decent. It's more than just a new coat of paint on the old game, but you can see though that the gameplay is evolutionary of the original game, not revolutionary. Blizzard had to do this so the game would find instant favour with the legions of Starcraft 1 fans. However, you just know that Blizzard held back Protoss and Zerg campaigns so they can wring more cash out of people buying this game. And you can be guaranteed that those 'expansions' will contain new branches to the existing tech trees for multiplayer, so you will have to buy them, even if you're not interested in the campaigns. Let's face it, multiplayer is the core of this game - but no LAN play is a slap in the face, forcing you onto Battle.net. An obvious ploy to deter piracy at the expense of people who buy the game, and forcing people into their realm for buying their retarded horse DLC. You can be sure there will be a "complete" battle chest edition in the future, with all the content that should have been there from the start. Then if they add LAN play back in, this game would be a perfect 10.… Expand
  56. MatthewH
    Jul 27, 2010
    9
    Looks at all the evolutions of the RTS (which I also love) and says "Actually, Starcraft was good enough then and it's good enough now". Throw in some counter related tweaks and you have some great gameplay coupled with great presentation. Sure, I'll miss my squad based commands (looking at you DoW and CoH) but I can accept that Starcraft is simply a different type of game and Looks at all the evolutions of the RTS (which I also love) and says "Actually, Starcraft was good enough then and it's good enough now". Throw in some counter related tweaks and you have some great gameplay coupled with great presentation. Sure, I'll miss my squad based commands (looking at you DoW and CoH) but I can accept that Starcraft is simply a different type of game and all are thoroughly enjoyable.… Expand
  57. Michael
    Jul 28, 2010
    9
    People with complaints about balance have a baseless argument since patches will fix it. People with complaints about performance can turn settings down. People with complaints about how it's 1/3 of the game clearly don't that its multiplayer experience has near endless replayability. The only valid concerns are the prices (and yes, the expansion prices as well) and the lack of People with complaints about balance have a baseless argument since patches will fix it. People with complaints about performance can turn settings down. People with complaints about how it's 1/3 of the game clearly don't that its multiplayer experience has near endless replayability. The only valid concerns are the prices (and yes, the expansion prices as well) and the lack of LAN play, since there IS and offline mode if you can't connect to the internet.… Expand
  58. AlexK
    Jul 28, 2010
    9
    I played the original and never finished the single player due to its high difficulty. I
  59. JeffW
    Jul 28, 2010
    9
    Really, really good... I wish you could give 9.8, but oh well! Doesn't quite get the full 10 from me, I would have liked to have seen maybe a little more innovation and new material, otherwise it has a flawless interface, engaging strategy, and just hard enough on normal to satisfy!
  60. NicholasB
    Jul 28, 2010
    8
    Okay everyone shut up, this game is decent. The gameplay is similar to the first one, the graphics are great by today's standards, the campaign has a nice length to it(about 8 hours worth of playtime), and the multiplayer is top notch. However, the story isn't that great, it might be hard for newer players to get in and win, and the fact that this is only 1/3rd of a game pushes Okay everyone shut up, this game is decent. The gameplay is similar to the first one, the graphics are great by today's standards, the campaign has a nice length to it(about 8 hours worth of playtime), and the multiplayer is top notch. However, the story isn't that great, it might be hard for newer players to get in and win, and the fact that this is only 1/3rd of a game pushes the score down to an 8. Wait for more scores to come in to decide if this is a good purchase.… Expand
  61. JoeE
    Jul 28, 2010
    9
    Simply amazing. I was in both phases of the beta, and the finished release version is just awesome. The level of detail in the single player game, so many hidden little bits of awesomeness, is astounding. Issues with RealID, lack of LAN play, lack of battle.net chat channels aside, the Game here in SC2 is damn good. And this is just the first of 3!
  62. BLB
    Jul 28, 2010
    9
    Great game. Don't understand what people are complaining about "not getting a full game". They get 30 missions in singleplayer and MP to boot. In the first Starcraft, you had 30 missions total between all the factions (10 each). This time around, you're going to get 30 in each expansion to come. I'm loving this game. I wonderful return to the classic game, with a new twist. Great game. Don't understand what people are complaining about "not getting a full game". They get 30 missions in singleplayer and MP to boot. In the first Starcraft, you had 30 missions total between all the factions (10 each). This time around, you're going to get 30 in each expansion to come. I'm loving this game. I wonderful return to the classic game, with a new twist. Great buy if you love new RTS games that play like a classic. Wonderful!… Expand
  63. richardh.
    Jul 28, 2010
    8
    Looks like a 5 year old game,plays like a 10 year old game but that is not so bad a thing,after all some may have missed it back then,iget the feeling it sould be released as an xbox arcade type game and wonder where the 10 years of development wentthat is until i tried the hard setting,it brings thought and tacticts into an otherwise paint by numbers game,however it seems the levels are Looks like a 5 year old game,plays like a 10 year old game but that is not so bad a thing,after all some may have missed it back then,iget the feeling it sould be released as an xbox arcade type game and wonder where the 10 years of development wentthat is until i tried the hard setting,it brings thought and tacticts into an otherwise paint by numbers game,however it seems the levels are so polished by the designers it becomes linear at times.… Expand
  64. RodM
    Jul 28, 2010
    9
    This is the ultimate RTS game. Period. Out of all the negative comments there is one stating the only reason why I won't give this game a 10: Lack of LAN play. Horrendous decision. Also ugly to deal with BNet for anything multiplayer, but other than that, the game is very well balanced, tweaked, detailed and thought out. Definitely a worthy successor of the legacy.
  65. BlazeN
    Jul 28, 2010
    9
    I played the original when it came out, and I gotta say i'm loving the sequel. I havent played online, but I have heard of some online balance issues, but that'll likely be fixed in short order like all of Blizzards RTS'. I gave it a 9 though because the Vulture was replaced by that god awful hellion. That may seem like a minor gripe, but I looooooove the Vulture.
  66. ChipW.
    Jul 29, 2010
    10
    Excellent game. Anyone saying it's 1/3 of a game is dead wrong. The campaign is the same length as the first game, give or take a mission or 2. Besides the campaign, there's also an additional challenge mode, which are kind of like mini games designed to test your game skill and knowledge. Also, there's lots of achievements for those completionists out there. Then Excellent game. Anyone saying it's 1/3 of a game is dead wrong. The campaign is the same length as the first game, give or take a mission or 2. Besides the campaign, there's also an additional challenge mode, which are kind of like mini games designed to test your game skill and knowledge. Also, there's lots of achievements for those completionists out there. Then there's the robust map editor, which allows players to create and share maps and mods that will be fun for years to come.… Expand
  67. HughM.
    Jul 29, 2010
    10
    I was skeptical about how this game would turn out after having played the entire line up of the first Starcraft games...Well after seeing it in action I decided to buy it, and it lives up to all the 10's and good reviews its gotten so far. Especially having some elements from the older games and refining them for the better. This game deserves more than a 10.
  68. ThomasM.
    Jul 29, 2010
    10
    This is by far the best RTS game since WC3. One sentence about the campaign: I cried nerd tears of happiness while i watched the ending-cinematic. I think this says everything. And i think i'm addicted to the multiplayer. The matchmaking is really fair once you are ranked correctly.
  69. MarcJ
    Jul 29, 2010
    10
    This is an absolute masterpiece of a game and 1 of the years greatest. SC2 has a great storyline that is actually involving and isn't just a tutorial for the multi-player. People complaining about the game being split up into 3 different games should shut it. the campaign is a good length and the multiplayer is outstanding. If you don't like this game, you either don't like This is an absolute masterpiece of a game and 1 of the years greatest. SC2 has a great storyline that is actually involving and isn't just a tutorial for the multi-player. People complaining about the game being split up into 3 different games should shut it. the campaign is a good length and the multiplayer is outstanding. If you don't like this game, you either don't like RTS games or are retarded and don't know a quality game when they see it. stop reading these reviews and go pick up SC2 NOW!… Expand
  70. JacobB
    Jul 29, 2010
    10
    The singles best RTS ever made. The choice to have one epic campaign instead of three smaller campaigns brought alot of awesomeness and epicness. Aside from this the multiplayer is intense, balanced, and fun. And the multiplayer actually WORKS compared to some other RTS's
  71. AndreiS.
    Jul 29, 2010
    10
    This is one of the best games I've ever played. Only one game, Warcraft 3, gave me a greater feeling while playing it for the first couple times... but maybe this is only because i was way younger when I played wc3 :P The multiplayer is great and the campaign seems exciting. The german localisation is GREAT. The game is pretty balanced, which is great for a new-released game. All in This is one of the best games I've ever played. Only one game, Warcraft 3, gave me a greater feeling while playing it for the first couple times... but maybe this is only because i was way younger when I played wc3 :P The multiplayer is great and the campaign seems exciting. The german localisation is GREAT. The game is pretty balanced, which is great for a new-released game. All in all, i would give it a 12 out of 10.… Expand
  72. RohitD.
    Jul 29, 2010
    10
    Impossible for me to vote less that 10, been playing it between WoW raiding and work and absolutely love the level of immersion that the game makes me feel.
  73. J.Prevost
    Jul 29, 2010
    10
    An amazing demonstration of why great gameplay is great. The core mechanics are pretty much the same as in the original
  74. thevoiceofreason
    Jul 29, 2010
    10
    Gary K This is not the game's fault, upgrade your computer. Don't blame the game just because your computer is shit.
  75. NateH
    Jul 29, 2010
    10
    As a long time jaded PC gamer this gem has me enjoying just playing more than any other game in recent memory. Its made my heart pound, made me laugh, and made me cry out in anguish! Every game pretty much I'm smiling thinking how fun it is.
  76. DaveF
    Jul 29, 2010
    10
    I don't like to play many or any RTS games because of the unbalanced game play or the terrible wait time. Starcraft the original was the exception. Most likely my favorite game since 1998 till about 2005. After hearing about a squeal for the game a lot of people I knew built up such high expectations and deemed it to be the most highly anticipated PC game of all time. Joining some I don't like to play many or any RTS games because of the unbalanced game play or the terrible wait time. Starcraft the original was the exception. Most likely my favorite game since 1998 till about 2005. After hearing about a squeal for the game a lot of people I knew built up such high expectations and deemed it to be the most highly anticipated PC game of all time. Joining some elite company including the Half Life series. Worth the wait and not a second too soon. Unlike those other boring RTS games Starcraft 2 goes back to its roots and really engages the old style of game play, story line and yes the god like multi player that kept the original alive for 10+ years. This one gives new eye candy, new troops and supports a better balanced system. Unlike the first one the second one offers more of an obstacle challenging the player to make strategies with different troops to maneuver across the high/low ground and even destroy barricades to either access an enemy base or just build a new colony. Hands down in my opinion it is the most anticipated PC game of all time and did not disappoint. This is one of those games that can single handedly return many old and abandoned RTS fans back to the PC to follow up on this game that deserves nothing short than a 10.… Expand
  77. MarkO
    Jul 29, 2010
    10
    StarCraft II is a great game. The multiplayer is still as well-balanced as the first (though I'm sure there will be some tweaks with some patches). If this weren't true then we'd see some substantial win ratios with a particular race on battle.net - but we don't. The graphics are good enough to appease any enthusiast but not too intense as to shrink the game's StarCraft II is a great game. The multiplayer is still as well-balanced as the first (though I'm sure there will be some tweaks with some patches). If this weren't true then we'd see some substantial win ratios with a particular race on battle.net - but we don't. The graphics are good enough to appease any enthusiast but not too intense as to shrink the game's consumer base. The story is much more involving than the first and Blizzard has really made a push to make it a more intense, real and interactive experience. The "No LAN play" issue isn't really an issue. I've been playing with my friends in the same room through battle.net just fine with no issue. LAN isn't really needed these days. Don't listen to the whiners. They're either stupid or bad players. This game includes all the options the original lacked (even though it was one of the best games ever!) including idle worker buttons, autocast, waypoints, order queuing, nonlinear campaign, etc). They've come up with some brilliant ways to alter gameplay while still making this game feel like the original and remain balanced. 10/10. Well done Blizzard.… Expand
  78. BernT
    Jul 29, 2010
    10
    A worthy successor to probably the best RTS ever made. Involving storyline with some nice inbetween mission features, like different tech trees and upgrade choices so it has a bit more re-playability. Multiplayer is top notch and is already more balanced than most RTS' are years after they're released. Probably the next big thing in eSports, which is a good thing since so many A worthy successor to probably the best RTS ever made. Involving storyline with some nice inbetween mission features, like different tech trees and upgrade choices so it has a bit more re-playability. Multiplayer is top notch and is already more balanced than most RTS' are years after they're released. Probably the next big thing in eSports, which is a good thing since so many shoddy games come out these days none get picked up and we're stuck seeing the same old games.… Expand
  79. JungH
    Jul 29, 2010
    10
    Here I will basically break down what everyone else is saying for you: $60 Price tag: Great game + free b.net service for life. Running these servers take some major $. I say a bargain, but only if you include the multiplayer. Performance: Like all modern games, you need to adjust for your computer's specs, but I think for the graphics it gives, its very tweaked and polished. Here I will basically break down what everyone else is saying for you: $60 Price tag: Great game + free b.net service for life. Running these servers take some major $. I say a bargain, but only if you include the multiplayer. Performance: Like all modern games, you need to adjust for your computer's specs, but I think for the graphics it gives, its very tweaked and polished. Single-player: various, unique missions, plenty of achievements and tech upgrades to play around with. Multiplayer: it's the best multiplayer experience you'll ever have with RTS. it does suck that LAN option is not there, but I believe it has to do with Activision influence, who don't want to lose profits from LANers bootlegging copies. Editor: Editor is like worth at least $30 alone. This has a potential to spawn hundreds of other games under starcraft. Most negative reviewers aren't really reviewing the game - just complaining about only portion of the game and giving a 0 or 1.… Expand
  80. AsimS
    Jul 29, 2010
    10
    This is probably the BEST fantasy RTS game around. The game is similar in style to SC1, but rather than being a weakness, it has become its strength. The gameplay has been even more streamlined and the graphics have been given the next gen treatment. This is perfection. Well done Blizzard. Now waiting for Diablo 3 :)
  81. StephenB
    Jul 29, 2010
    10
    While I'm in no way a fan of Blizzard anymore after what WoW should have been and what it is now I am floored by SC2. I thought the story was excellent and well polished. While there may or may not be some balance issues Blizzard always addresses those quickly in their RTS games. What really makes me give this game a 10 is the Galaxy Editor that comes with the game. Blizzard has While I'm in no way a fan of Blizzard anymore after what WoW should have been and what it is now I am floored by SC2. I thought the story was excellent and well polished. While there may or may not be some balance issues Blizzard always addresses those quickly in their RTS games. What really makes me give this game a 10 is the Galaxy Editor that comes with the game. Blizzard has released what is essentially a professional game development kit with some pre-made stuff for you to play with.… Expand
  82. NikE
    Jul 29, 2010
    9
    People who have been calling out the balancing: No, you're just awful if you think the game has bad balance. Terran Mech is slightly OP but overall the game IS VERY VERY well balanced ( trust me, I'm a random Diamond league player, I know what the f*ck I'm talking about), there is a good reason blizzard spent so much time with the beta. Also to anyone complaining that the People who have been calling out the balancing: No, you're just awful if you think the game has bad balance. Terran Mech is slightly OP but overall the game IS VERY VERY well balanced ( trust me, I'm a random Diamond league player, I know what the f*ck I'm talking about), there is a good reason blizzard spent so much time with the beta. Also to anyone complaining that the multi-player is too Micro-based apparently you have never heard of IdrA, the Macro King. Guess what: he does JUST FINE in SC2 and already has a few 1st and 2nd place finishes in slew of different tournaments. Storyline is quite pathetic, but then again the plot in nearly every video game are simplistic, awful or cringe-worthy melodramatic.… Expand
  83. WilfridW
    Jul 29, 2010
    10
    This game as a whole package is perfect. Classic Starcraft RTS that you can get into it immediately like haven't cycled for a long time, checked. Immense story before and after campaigns, checked. Clear achievement goals, checked. Rewards to choose how you want to upgrade your units and structure, checked. Different tech path to upgrade your overall faction, checked. Integration to This game as a whole package is perfect. Classic Starcraft RTS that you can get into it immediately like haven't cycled for a long time, checked. Immense story before and after campaigns, checked. Clear achievement goals, checked. Rewards to choose how you want to upgrade your units and structure, checked. Different tech path to upgrade your overall faction, checked. Integration to Internet on showcasing achievements and linking to Facebook, checked. Guys, ignore those whinners. Get this game.… Expand
  84. MatthewM
    Jul 29, 2010
    10
    I love how douchebags can rate a game as zero simply to make a point. Even if you don't like Starcraft 2 there's no way you can give it a zero. The Balance is great and it works on low end systems. The game looks great, you get a ton of options, amazing cinematics and an online experience that people will playing for years to come
  85. SteveN
    Jul 29, 2010
    10
    SC2 continues the story and tradition of the franchise. Balance in multiplayer is a polished as the first game and it will only get better. The single player story is a great story presented well each mission is unique. All in all worth the money. Truly a game that will last a decade or more like it's predecessor.
  86. Fazz
    Jul 29, 2010
    10
    Just incredible. The campaign is epic and in depth, with huge mission variety, the multiplayer is naturally flawless and only improves on the origonal. No LAN is a small issue but this was an anti piracy move so it makes sense, considering blizzard decided not to clutter the game with DRM (The only security check is the serial key and a battle.net connection, hence why the cracked release Just incredible. The campaign is epic and in depth, with huge mission variety, the multiplayer is naturally flawless and only improves on the origonal. No LAN is a small issue but this was an anti piracy move so it makes sense, considering blizzard decided not to clutter the game with DRM (The only security check is the serial key and a battle.net connection, hence why the cracked release was out so fast)… Expand
  87. TrojA
    Jul 31, 2010
    8
    Good game, decent graphics, great design, good story (people call it cliché but come on, it's a RTS, not a movie) awesome multiplayer. It's Starcraft 1 with updated graphics, which is how it should be. While some people here give it a 1 for that reason, I don't, I wouldn't even want it changed. It's Starcraft, and it should stay that way. Look at C&C's Good game, decent graphics, great design, good story (people call it cliché but come on, it's a RTS, not a movie) awesome multiplayer. It's Starcraft 1 with updated graphics, which is how it should be. While some people here give it a 1 for that reason, I don't, I wouldn't even want it changed. It's Starcraft, and it should stay that way. Look at C&C's last episode, dissapointed most casual gamers and hardcore fans of the game. Also, don't be scared away by people saying it has horrible framerate, those people should either buy a new rig or update their drivers, because my laptop with a mobile hd 4850 runs it fine on settings on ultra.… Expand
  88. LincolnL
    Jul 31, 2010
    10
    Best game to be released in years. The campaign story while somewhat cliche is great. (What story isn't cliche these days?) People complaining about the single player only including 1/3 of the game obviously haven't played it, since it's easily longer and has more content than most recent games I've played barring long RPGs with 20+ hour storylines. The multiplayer is Best game to be released in years. The campaign story while somewhat cliche is great. (What story isn't cliche these days?) People complaining about the single player only including 1/3 of the game obviously haven't played it, since it's easily longer and has more content than most recent games I've played barring long RPGs with 20+ hour storylines. The multiplayer is awesome (if you like that kind of thing) and while maybe not perfectly balanced, it's as close as can be expected. Overall must buy.… Expand
  89. MatthiasF
    Jul 31, 2010
    10
    Extremely well done RTS. Worthy sequel to the original game which I blame for many lost nights and weekends. Performance is excellent too. The story is engaging and surprising altogether. First game in months which got me hooked on again. I don't mind the split into a trilogy myself and while some moves done by Blizzard are controversial (and as WoW player I'm used to their Extremely well done RTS. Worthy sequel to the original game which I blame for many lost nights and weekends. Performance is excellent too. The story is engaging and surprising altogether. First game in months which got me hooked on again. I don't mind the split into a trilogy myself and while some moves done by Blizzard are controversial (and as WoW player I'm used to their antics) they tend to be rather forthcoming as time goes by.… Expand
  90. DennisH
    Jul 31, 2010
    10
    An absolutely perfect refinement of the classic RTS game. Yes, there's not much new in terms of types of gameplay but what the games does contain is near-perfect balance and polish polish and more polish. If you like RTS games it's literally impossible to not like Starcraft II.
  91. PepeM
    Jul 31, 2010
    8
    Why does everyone on metacritic vote games either 1 or 10? Everyone here is a fanboy or a hater. You guys are stupid. A 1 would mean its a horrible game thats not worth a dollar. A 10 would mean it's absolute perfection. Starcraft 2 is neither. It's a good game. It's well above average, but not perfect. Therefore i'm giving it an 8.
  92. OP
    Jul 31, 2010
    10
    Awesome game... digital download from battle.net and installation were flawless. The game itself is no disappointment. Battle.net 2.0 is much better than the original battle.net. A lot of the features have been very well thought out... The best feature would probably be the quick matchmaking feature... which works perfectly.
  93. JoeN
    Jul 31, 2010
    10
    Best singleplayer campaign that an RTS can ever be. Every mission have different styles and gameplay. The longevity of singleplayer campaign is definitely guaranteed, and to explore hidden treasures or to unlock all the achievement you have tons of hours to kill. There is no other PC game that has such a huge production value, a true 100 million dollars game. And not surprisingly, Best singleplayer campaign that an RTS can ever be. Every mission have different styles and gameplay. The longevity of singleplayer campaign is definitely guaranteed, and to explore hidden treasures or to unlock all the achievement you have tons of hours to kill. There is no other PC game that has such a huge production value, a true 100 million dollars game. And not surprisingly, multiplayer is beyond that, a game that you can spend thousands of hours on. There is definitely no game worthier the money than this one on PC.… Expand
  94. AdamR
    Aug 22, 2010
    10
    First, lets get one thing straight: This is a sequel. Hence the 2 after the, "Starcraft". It will bear a similarity to the original. Blizzards intent is to take the original game, refine it, tune it, add new content, spruce it up, and keep the story moving. It has succeeded on every count. There are a large number of new units: Certainly more then enough to completely alter the playingFirst, lets get one thing straight: This is a sequel. Hence the 2 after the, "Starcraft". It will bear a similarity to the original. Blizzards intent is to take the original game, refine it, tune it, add new content, spruce it up, and keep the story moving. It has succeeded on every count. There are a large number of new units: Certainly more then enough to completely alter the playing field, and add in a wide number of new strategies while still feeling like that Starcraft we know and love at its core. New units are neither a hackneyed add-on, nor an overpowered new addition: They fit into the new game seamlessly in clever, interesting new ways. Level design is varied, interesting, and quite open to user content

    The single player is a real treat. As long as any previous Starcraft game, and there is actually a lack of, "Race A here, Race B there, now kill each other" scenarios. I started missing this standard, cliche level design, but the overwhelming variety of mission objectives is impressive. One mission your robbing a train using quick, mobile units, another your hunkering down for a zombie wave, while rapidly destroying the infestation mostly undisturbed by day, and suddenly you playing an almost puzzle-esque level of priority assassinations and planning. The variety is astounding. Achievements are interesting, and add a good deal of re-playability, and challenge missions add that little something extra

    The Cons are pretty negligible. An extra 10 dollar price tag is a bit insulting, but Id finger point at Activision, and you are paying for quality. Loss of LAN will hurt only a very small percentage of people, thanks to the friend system: My internet is extremely unreliable, along with all the people I live with, and I have yet to observe any appreciable difference from traditional LAN play. Menus can get a bit confusing, and adding a friend manually is a bit annoying, and while the Facebook integration is interesting, but doesn't seem to be very reliable. Also, Protoss fans only get a brief glimpse of there single player, while Zerg get no single player outside of challenges, which may be annoying, but make no mistake: You get a full games worth of content here. Lastly, thanks to the 3 separate releases, don't get to attached to medics, fire bats, science vessels, or a number of other units: They do not yet carry over into Multiplayer. It's an understandable balance issue, we need to hold off until other races get there shiny new units, but its a tad annoying.

    Sequels are a problem when they are pushed out constantly without much improvement to the overall design. SC2 took what, 12 years, and has the maximum possible new content without feeling like it's covering the core experience. Blizzard hasn't created a new life form, it has just taken a giant step forward in its evolution, with hardly a vestigial tail or wisdom tooth in sight. Perfect no, but I think it rounds up to a 10.    … Expand
  95. Honkeymagoo
    Aug 26, 2010
    8
    This is Starcraft 2, if you're not an RTS fan this probably won't turn you into one, but if you're a Starcraft/ Warcraft player it won't disappoint. STORY: Eh, I wasn't wowed by it, but it wasn't a turn off either, it kept me playing but won't win any awards for the plot either, voice acting is decent, but again not award winning. GRAPHICS: A very good looking RTS no doubt, the Zerg lookThis is Starcraft 2, if you're not an RTS fan this probably won't turn you into one, but if you're a Starcraft/ Warcraft player it won't disappoint. STORY: Eh, I wasn't wowed by it, but it wasn't a turn off either, it kept me playing but won't win any awards for the plot either, voice acting is decent, but again not award winning. GRAPHICS: A very good looking RTS no doubt, the Zerg look creepy, the Protoss look shiny, and Terran look gritty, overall I think the graphics will hold up well and it's a very pretty game to look ing. SOUND: Pretty decent sound, each race is distinctive in the way it sounds you're not going to mistake the Zerg for the Terrans, also the swooshes and blips of the menus are nicely done. GAMEPLAY: This is where most people get divided, if you're a HUGE Supcom fan you're probably not going to like the gameplay as Starcraft is much more oriented with the Macro style gameplay, it's fast paced with most matches end in less than 15 minutes, but CAN last over an hour. VALUE: This is a high value game, the custom maps and mods are going to make this game into a game that is played for years to come. Overall it's definitely worth the money if you're an RTS fan. OVERALL: I'd say Starcraft 2 is not the 2nd coming that the hype would lead most people to believe, but it's going to revolutionize e-sports within 2 years, the custom maps and mod scene will be HUGE, so if you're a fan of RTS games pick it up, but if you're not, then it's probably not going to convert you.… Expand
  96. justinscustoms
    Aug 25, 2010
    8
    As already mentioned Starcraft II indeed delivers on the same game play mechanics of its predecessor which as before was very easy to jump in and play, I also enjoyed a more serious look into the Starcraft universe offering a storyline that allows that keeps the single player interesting and offers moral choices that effect future game play. I also have to complement Blizzard on makingAs already mentioned Starcraft II indeed delivers on the same game play mechanics of its predecessor which as before was very easy to jump in and play, I also enjoyed a more serious look into the Starcraft universe offering a storyline that allows that keeps the single player interesting and offers moral choices that effect future game play. I also have to complement Blizzard on making the game scalable which indeed seems to be a corporate goal of theirs and the game runs amicably on systems much lesser than mine with tolerable settings. Where I was left a little aback on was how little upwardly the graphics scaled, having a more than capable system seemed to offer little difference than much lower rigs and at the hefty 60$ dollar tag and 12 years of possible development, it did leave me wanting a little more. I also was less than happy with the lack of campaigns available for the Protoss and Zerg. All in all it is a solid game and worth picking up, it will consume your time and it is definitely challenging.… Expand
  97. gams
    Aug 26, 2010
    10
    Holy! sh*t! what a game! amazing amazing
    Excellent history, excellent gameplay, excellent graphics, what's not excellent in this second version of the best strategy game of all times!
  98. Rumpelstiltskin
    Aug 26, 2010
    10
    @JCT You're the typical moron saying "wah wah 12 years in the making wah wah". For your information jack***, the game didn't even start development until 2003 and in 2005 they stopped for a year to work on WoW. If you can make a better game than by all means... do it. Secondly this game has way more features than 99% of all RTS games in the past decade. 20+ maps, great matchmaking, etc.@JCT You're the typical moron saying "wah wah 12 years in the making wah wah". For your information jack***, the game didn't even start development until 2003 and in 2005 they stopped for a year to work on WoW. If you can make a better game than by all means... do it. Secondly this game has way more features than 99% of all RTS games in the past decade. 20+ maps, great matchmaking, etc. Did you really just compare StarCraft 2 to GTA4? 2 very different games... not to mention GTA4 is completely the opposite of this game. GTA4 is the game that had cut features but I won't go into that since this is about SC2. Know what you're talking about you stupid f**k.

    I guess virgins like yourself, who spent 10 hours a day playing the original, will never accept that games change and keeping them the exact same as the original is pointless. So do us a favor and never write a review again because you just made yourself look like a complete dumb***.    … Expand
  99. Alucard
    Aug 26, 2010
    8
    Starcraft II is a GREAT game. It has quite possibly the best graphics i have ever seen in an RTS and the gameplay is great and I only have a few problems with the game. Problem 1) the need to be logged in to play singleplayer that is seriously just a pain in the ass. Problem 2) The fact that the majority of units you can get in the campaign and lots of classic Starcraft Units cannot beStarcraft II is a GREAT game. It has quite possibly the best graphics i have ever seen in an RTS and the gameplay is great and I only have a few problems with the game. Problem 1) the need to be logged in to play singleplayer that is seriously just a pain in the ass. Problem 2) The fact that the majority of units you can get in the campaign and lots of classic Starcraft Units cannot be used in the multiplayer (Firebats, Medics, Vultures, Diamondbacks, wraiths, Science Vessels, and Goliaths) and other units from the original starcraft are not even included (dark archons, Valkyries, Scouts, Corsairs, Reavers, Gaurdians, Arbiters, Devourers, Scourge, Defielers, and flying queens) like is there really a reason you need to take out a ton of the original units? 3) The protoss have been incredibly weakened to the point where they're almost not worth playing im not a great player but i am pretty decent but the loss of scouts, corsairs and arbiters has destroyed the protoss air forces void rays are good for destroying buildings and tanks and stuff but when they come up against another large force of air the specializes in anti air they will get destroyed, pheonix's are useless and carriers have had their build time increased. Reavers have been completly taken out meaning the protoss no longer have a long ranged anti building unit/defence unit (though i must admit the colossi are pretty good at holding back waves of ground units) and immortals while powerfull really dont have the punch or the range siege tanks do or the massive damage of ultralisks. No more dark archons means that you can no longer steal units from enemies which im sure that terran and zerg players are thankfull about but i always loved being able to branch out into other races and just in general if im low on minerals steal enemy units to bolster my own forces. as for defending your base Photon Cannons have had a huge range reduction and have had some damage reduction this makes defending your base from reapers incredibly hard as they can just hop cliffs anywhere and take out your buildings fast and always seem to stay just outside your cannon range while they hit your pylons. Despite all these flaws i still consider starcraft II to be a great game the terrain mechanics are just great small eye candy things you may not notice like the fact that when you blow up something if the wreckage is on a ramp it will slide down it (i just found that to be a cool thing in sc2) so obviously alot of work went into this game (10 freaking years of work) but its here now and hopefully through balancing and patches the races will be balanced because as it is protoss are waaaaaay underpowered… Expand
  100. Kassdhal
    Aug 28, 2010
    8
    By large the best STR done so far. The campaign is great and innovative. Pure Blizzard game in many respects: extremely polished and thought-through, great realization, perfect balance. The best studio of the last 17 years has not lost its touch.
    The big issue for me, as it was for the first Starcraft is Multiplayer. Very balanced gameplay but it is always Rush, Rush, Rush and having no    By large the best STR done so far. The campaign is great and innovative. Pure Blizzard game in many respects: extremely polished and thought-through, great realization, perfect balance. The best studio of the last 17 years has not lost its touch.
    The big issue for me, as it was for the first Starcraft is Multiplayer. Very balanced gameplay but it is always Rush, Rush, Rush and having no other choice than either stop multiplayer or being forced into always the same kind os strategy is depressing. There should be a way to play on maps allowing long term development instead of being forced to rush all the time. Maybe it is only wishful thinking.    … Expand
Page:

Awards & Rankings

2
#2 Best PC Game of 2010
2
#2 Most Discussed PC Game of 2010
5
#5 Most Shared PC Game of 2010

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
93

Universal acclaim - based on 82 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 82 out of 82
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 82
  3. Negative: 0 out of 82
  1. PC Zone UK
    Jan 18, 2011
    95
    "Quotation Forthcoming"
  2. Video Game Talk
    Jan 18, 2011
    90
    If you are into real time strategy in any form, it's hard to ignore Starcraft II.
    Read full review
  3. PC Format
    Dec 24, 2010
    93
    Perfectly balanced multiplayer with old school elements intact, and rich and dynamic single player campaigns. [Issue#244, p.102]
See all critic reviews »