Starcraft II: Wings of Liberty

 PC
User Score
8.2

Generally favorable reviews- based on 3772 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2,975 out of 3772
  2. Mixed: 410 out of 3772
  3. Negative: 387 out of 3772
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. snowshreder
    Jul 5, 2011
    10
    Starcraft is another one of Blizzards legacy games it will be around for while just like Diablo and WOW you have to appreciated these games for what they are if your not into them well that's too bad because Blizzard polishes there games with TLC unlike other great games out there which are buggy beyond belief. Starcraft II is a great strategy game and the mechanics are setting greatStarcraft is another one of Blizzards legacy games it will be around for while just like Diablo and WOW you have to appreciated these games for what they are if your not into them well that's too bad because Blizzard polishes there games with TLC unlike other great games out there which are buggy beyond belief. Starcraft II is a great strategy game and the mechanics are setting great examples for future Strategy games. As far as the story goes, well you have to know the older game stories to appreciate this continuing story which i think is just perfection.… Expand
  2. DarthMang
    Apr 2, 2012
    10
    It takes everything you loved about Starcraft and makes it bigger, better, and more beautiful. The most notable addition, though, is the campaign. Instead of upgrading on a mission to mission basis, between missions you are essentially playing a point and click adventure that not only looks beautiful, but allows you to get additional information on the story, but it is from here that youIt takes everything you loved about Starcraft and makes it bigger, better, and more beautiful. The most notable addition, though, is the campaign. Instead of upgrading on a mission to mission basis, between missions you are essentially playing a point and click adventure that not only looks beautiful, but allows you to get additional information on the story, but it is from here that you can upgrade your arsenal and it stays with you throughout each mission. At first I was upset about only getting the Terran campaign with this single game, but the 30 missions and the promise of at least two more equally large expansions more than makes up for it when they are this good.… Expand
  3. Alu
    Dec 3, 2012
    10
    It was hard for me to read low scores from users - I dont understand it at all - Are people really that intentionally destructive ? Do you do it for shock value? what makes you tick? This is a great game in every way it was meant to be. The storyline - not the most riveting - but not terrible as some of you shock turkeys suggest. Campaign was great - I had a blast playing it - again,It was hard for me to read low scores from users - I dont understand it at all - Are people really that intentionally destructive ? Do you do it for shock value? what makes you tick? This is a great game in every way it was meant to be. The storyline - not the most riveting - but not terrible as some of you shock turkeys suggest. Campaign was great - I had a blast playing it - again, I dont know what the rest of you turkeys felt was wrong with it. Finally, Multiplayer - what it basically all comes down to for Starcraft players - It is perfect in my opinion - Balanced and full of depth. This game is not about leveling up your "character"/"force" so it should not be rated poorly because of this. You will find yourself fine tuning your "build" in conjunction with your matchups constantly. This is the beauty of Starcraft 1 and Starcraft 2 - Blizzard has done a great job with this game. Some of you wanted more races - and for each race to have a complete campaign. You feel everything should come in one installment. Whats great about starcraft 2 is it does not give into this idea - It preserves its quality over quantity guarentee. And I for one look forward to buying each expansion (most likely 2 more) with campaigns for zerg and protoss on the horizon; each packed with quality. Honestly, rate a game accurately. If you played this game and have half a brain you know its just deceptive to others.… Expand
  4. MadnessisRising
    Dec 19, 2020
    10
    Starcraft 2: WoL has by far the best campaign of all 4! Also the multiplayer was something new back then. Fantastic game!
  5. Failshipdown
    Mar 26, 2011
    10
    One hundred percent win. One hundred percent win. One hundred percent win. One hundred percent win. One hundred percent win. One hundred percent win. One hundred percent win. One hundred percent win.
  6. Aironas17
    Aug 24, 2010
    10
    It's a awesome and cool game,good graphics,good story,good soundtrack,good game play,good menu,a lot of achievement's and awesome Multilayer who's needed to be played all days all nights.
  7. DerekW
    Jul 28, 2010
    9
    First off the game is fast and fun. The game balance at launch is much better than the original game was at its launch, and with Blizzards track record of supporting their games well after release the game will continue to get better as time goes on. There are just enough user interface changes and new units to make the game feel fresh. The game scales well in terms of graphics for the First off the game is fast and fun. The game balance at launch is much better than the original game was at its launch, and with Blizzards track record of supporting their games well after release the game will continue to get better as time goes on. There are just enough user interface changes and new units to make the game feel fresh. The game scales well in terms of graphics for the older machines. The thing that causes the one point drop is battle.net 2.0 does not have the same level of polish as the game has such as lacking a text based large group chat. Yes the game has a friends list messenger. But it… Expand
  8. RandallO.
    Jul 28, 2010
    8
    I would love to give this game less than an eight, because that is what it deserves. However when looking at the bigger picture I realize i thoroughly enjoy the game itself so it warrants an eight. However, Blizzard F'ed up big time in many departments. 1) Battle.net 2.0 sucks horribly. 2) Blizzard tried to innovate and the UI (User Interface) is horribly like Dawn of War 2 and XBOX I would love to give this game less than an eight, because that is what it deserves. However when looking at the bigger picture I realize i thoroughly enjoy the game itself so it warrants an eight. However, Blizzard F'ed up big time in many departments. 1) Battle.net 2.0 sucks horribly. 2) Blizzard tried to innovate and the UI (User Interface) is horribly like Dawn of War 2 and XBOX Live. (Both Suck) 3) I can't add my Mexican friend because he plays in a different realm. 4)There's no chat channels. (OKAY????) 5) I played the BETA (thousands of complaints went unheard. 6) Custom games are joined by map title basis (Example. I join a popular custom game i. e. Dota. Host is afk. I leave and rejoin and it auto puts me back with that host. You can't specify custom game names like no rush, all random ettc..) and many other problems with StarCraft 2 besides the gameplay itself. I could rant on and on about more things that are messed up. Like the clan system in warcraft 3 was brilliant and the Tournaments were awesome. So far the Campaign is fun but i'm not that far into it. It is utterly better than any other rts i've played in terms of the game itself and will be a great E Sport. Blizzard needs to fix the UI.… Expand
  9. ThomasS
    Jul 28, 2010
    9
    For the kind of cash you have to shell out for a game of this caliber would it have killed you to include a proper game manual with the game! Seriously the docs are about the crappiest I have ever seen included with a game! Nice online docs sort of make up for this. Also have not found a way to start a second campaign, so if there are more than two people in your household does you For the kind of cash you have to shell out for a game of this caliber would it have killed you to include a proper game manual with the game! Seriously the docs are about the crappiest I have ever seen included with a game! Nice online docs sort of make up for this. Also have not found a way to start a second campaign, so if there are more than two people in your household does you probably have to shell out more cash if they both want to play. You can replay the missions but its not the same.… Expand
  10. JamesA.
    Jul 28, 2010
    9
    Conservative 9, because I don't like to give out 10's. The graphics are amazingly polished and definitely evoke that feeling that the game won't forget its lineage, the races are amazingly balanced, and the soundtrack is possibly the best to come from Blizzard (and that's saying something for the comppany with the best sound in gaming today). This "1/3 game" that the Conservative 9, because I don't like to give out 10's. The graphics are amazingly polished and definitely evoke that feeling that the game won't forget its lineage, the races are amazingly balanced, and the soundtrack is possibly the best to come from Blizzard (and that's saying something for the comppany with the best sound in gaming today). This "1/3 game" that the minority rails against is over 2 1/2 times larger than any prior campaign. All I can think of is if once the others are out and there's the inevitable SC2 Battle Chest, are all these 0's (who obviously never bought the game) going to turn into 10's?… Expand
  11. RamiroC.
    Aug 3, 2010
    10
    After 12 years waiting...they just appeared with the Best Game Ever. Amazing Campaign mode with a lot of different missions. New options between missions New amazing and well balanced units. The worst thing about the game? That you have to wait for the expansion to know what is going to happen!
  12. MikeG.
    Aug 3, 2010
    10
    Everything you could hope for to the sequel to what many consider the best RTS game out there. All though battle.net 2.0 may be a work in process everything that is import about the game itself is wonderfully executed. Gameplay is as addicting as SC1, the Soundtrack seems even better, the graphics look wonderful for the style of SC, the campaign is an absolute blast. Even in spite of Everything you could hope for to the sequel to what many consider the best RTS game out there. All though battle.net 2.0 may be a work in process everything that is import about the game itself is wonderfully executed. Gameplay is as addicting as SC1, the Soundtrack seems even better, the graphics look wonderful for the style of SC, the campaign is an absolute blast. Even in spite of Battle.nets limitations the most important thing it needs to do works flawlessly, which is placing you in matches against players of your relative skill level.… Expand
  13. JamesY.
    Aug 3, 2010
    10
    Starcraft 2 is all about the multiplayer. It's singleplayer is good, much better than MW2 where it's one go and done, whereas this will keep you coming back, because it's just so fun. Custom content is what makes me coming back and back.
  14. DF
    Aug 3, 2010
    10
    The game is fantastic. I received it the day it came out and haven't really been able to put it down since. I'm a very casual gamer, so I was thrilled at the new multiplayer mode as it really helps work you into the game. First, there are "practice" levels with easier map layouts to help ease you into the game, you can play up to 50 of these matches before jumping into the real The game is fantastic. I received it the day it came out and haven't really been able to put it down since. I'm a very casual gamer, so I was thrilled at the new multiplayer mode as it really helps work you into the game. First, there are "practice" levels with easier map layouts to help ease you into the game, you can play up to 50 of these matches before jumping into the real thing. Second, placement matches- you will play 5 matches then get placed with people who are as terrible as you are! this is a big selling point for me because I'm not very good. Third, challenges- there are challenges you can try to master that really show the strengths and pros of each unit for each race and helps give you an idea of what you want to do. fourth-organized computer battles- in the original my friends and I really enjoyed playing computers, but we had to go to custom games set it up etc. Now its just a click away, get you friend and pick the game. fantastic. Th ere are also many different A.I. difficulty levels to make it fun. Fifth- Easy matching- You can quick start a game and don't have to try to join a game first, which is awesome. you can be playing in seconds. I've played a little of the campaign too (which is really why I bought the game in the first place, it says a lot about the game that it's MP has kept me so engrossed). It is fantastic, and the interaction with the environment between missions which highlights the story and lore even more is unlike any RTS I've ever played. That said it IS an RTS which really isn't for everyone, but if you like real time strategy this game is a must buy.… Expand
  15. StefanD
    Aug 4, 2010
    10
    Wow amazing the hate from the trolls in this vote board. Starcraft 2 is excellent, if you loved the first one you will love this! Engaging story, excellent graphics (remember this is an RTS and not a FPS you TROLLS!), and great all around presentation!! Highly Recommended!
  16. rockmosh
    Aug 4, 2010
    10
    Excellent game, been waiting for a decade and it was well worth it. I played since the beta and I havent had this much fun in years. This is a full game, dont fall for the illusion that its incomplete just because its part of a trilogy. It has 30 or so campaing missions and the full multiplayer experience.
  17. ErikC.
    Aug 4, 2010
    10
    I think most people need to step back and remember it's STARCRAFT 2, not some new game. Blizzard never has been known for their pushing of new innovated game play and I doubt they ever will. They take what they know works and throw it together into a bundle and polish it to near perfection. That is exactly what SC2 is, Starcraft with a nice new shiny coat of paint. If you don't I think most people need to step back and remember it's STARCRAFT 2, not some new game. Blizzard never has been known for their pushing of new innovated game play and I doubt they ever will. They take what they know works and throw it together into a bundle and polish it to near perfection. That is exactly what SC2 is, Starcraft with a nice new shiny coat of paint. If you don't like Starcraft then you shouldn't review this game because guess what it's Starcraft 2.0. There is nothing really new about Starcraft and I personally like that; I was able to jump right in and enjoy my old favorite game once again. If you wanted different game play then go play a different RTS franchise. The storyline wasn't deep but it was fun, I felt involved within the missions and look forward to the expansions. For all your people out there down rating for what it lacks it's time to look at what it has, and tell me what you find wrong with it then.… Expand
  18. GernR.
    Aug 4, 2010
    10
    I don't know why everyone complains: "It's a new sc1". In my eyes, that's the best that could have happened. Starcraft 1 was the best strategygames for years, so why not remaking it, polished up, with a nice competition-system, new units, upgrades and abilities and an awesome editor? Blizzard really did a great job in those things, although the graphics aren't really I don't know why everyone complains: "It's a new sc1". In my eyes, that's the best that could have happened. Starcraft 1 was the best strategygames for years, so why not remaking it, polished up, with a nice competition-system, new units, upgrades and abilities and an awesome editor? Blizzard really did a great job in those things, although the graphics aren't really high end. I myself like that Blizz-comiclook, so I have nothing to complain. Great multiplayer experience, wonderful campaign, awesome game.… Expand
  19. AlfonsoG
    Aug 5, 2010
    10
    Fantastic. I've spent plenty of time in the campaign and the multiplayer, both Custom and Ladder and I have to say, I'm completely impressed. Being an avid gamer, that doesn't happen often. Bravo, Blizzard.
  20. Erik
    Aug 6, 2010
    8
    It ain't perfect but nothing really is. I do really enjoy this reborn version of one of my favorit game, the campaign might be a bit cliché but still I feel hooked into it. The thing about being connected to Bnet all time is annoying but works very well and so does the matching system inside the game. But I would also like to point out that anything that is but into the game It ain't perfect but nothing really is. I do really enjoy this reborn version of one of my favorit game, the campaign might be a bit cliché but still I feel hooked into it. The thing about being connected to Bnet all time is annoying but works very well and so does the matching system inside the game. But I would also like to point out that anything that is but into the game Blizzard has approved of which is why they only get a 8 from me. Dropping LAN ain't ok Blizz!… Expand
  21. MikeO.
    Aug 3, 2010
    10
    It's what was great about StarCraft but with additional dimensions added on (and I don't just mean gorgeous 3D rendering as compared to SC:BW isomorphic 2D). Play through the campaign on "Normal" for the story, then play through on "Hard" (or worse!) for a challenge; complete all the 'Challenges'; chase down interesting achievements; and that's all aside from the It's what was great about StarCraft but with additional dimensions added on (and I don't just mean gorgeous 3D rendering as compared to SC:BW isomorphic 2D). Play through the campaign on "Normal" for the story, then play through on "Hard" (or worse!) for a challenge; complete all the 'Challenges'; chase down interesting achievements; and that's all aside from the core of the game, multiplayer play. The ladder is still there, but the new BattleNet system prevents "smurphing", i.e. good players can't use a fake name to sneak into the Copper leagues and stomp on the n00bs. And they've improved the management of cooperative games. Twenty pounds of fun in a five-pound bag!… Expand
  22. ColinK
    Aug 3, 2010
    10
    Anyone criticizing this game because it's only "one third" of a game obviously hasn't played it. While it's true that the campaign is Terran only, it's as big, if not bigger, than the 30 mission campaign that included all the races in the original game. The additions of mission choices; buying upgrades, research, and mercenaries; acheivements; and bonus objectives in Anyone criticizing this game because it's only "one third" of a game obviously hasn't played it. While it's true that the campaign is Terran only, it's as big, if not bigger, than the 30 mission campaign that included all the races in the original game. The additions of mission choices; buying upgrades, research, and mercenaries; acheivements; and bonus objectives in missions all build on top of the same formula that worked to make the original game so much fun. Add to that the new units and structures, and the fact that the missions are more varied than ever (still haven't played one where the goal was just to destroy the enemy, there's always some interesting twist), and this might have been worth the 10 year wait.… Expand
  23. Fluster
    Aug 3, 2010
    10
    After the disappointing C&C 4, this came as a most welcome change for a RTS fan like me. I loved Starcraft 1 and I love this game even more. The graphics are amazing and surprisingly the game runs smooth on High/Ultra settings on my 2gb, geforce9800 and 2ghz C2D PC. The campaign is fun and plays out at just the right pace. There are numerous upgrades, bonus units for you to play around After the disappointing C&C 4, this came as a most welcome change for a RTS fan like me. I loved Starcraft 1 and I love this game even more. The graphics are amazing and surprisingly the game runs smooth on High/Ultra settings on my 2gb, geforce9800 and 2ghz C2D PC. The campaign is fun and plays out at just the right pace. There are numerous upgrades, bonus units for you to play around with, and finally the Multiplayer totally blows you away. Ladders, perfect match making and a slick efficient Battlenet 2. The Terran campaign included is huge with around 30 missions, that would keep you busy for hours. Add to this achievements, excellent cinematics and voice acting and you have tons of stuff to fuel your bragging rights. My only complaint is the absence of LAN play. In conclusion the RTS game world sorely needed a game like this and Blizzard has delivered a masterpiece. Starcraft 2 lives up to the hype and more.… Expand
  24. FJ
    Aug 4, 2010
    10
    This is just another example of how great games will remain good for eternity. The trend of bringing games back to their roots is really saying something here. The truth is games have not really improved since the golden ages of gaming. Most developers no longer have the gamer's heart and creativity which shows in their bland games of this generation. Great job Blizzard, this game is This is just another example of how great games will remain good for eternity. The trend of bringing games back to their roots is really saying something here. The truth is games have not really improved since the golden ages of gaming. Most developers no longer have the gamer's heart and creativity which shows in their bland games of this generation. Great job Blizzard, this game is breath of fresh air for us true gamers.… Expand
  25. DannyV
    Aug 4, 2010
    10
    It would be nice if some people actually played this game before putting up a bogus 0 review about LAN play. The game is awesome. I can never really get hooked on rts games because they aren't fast enough or the missions are too boring. This game is fast and each mission is completely different. I've played about 30 hours and I haven't even completed the single player It would be nice if some people actually played this game before putting up a bogus 0 review about LAN play. The game is awesome. I can never really get hooked on rts games because they aren't fast enough or the missions are too boring. This game is fast and each mission is completely different. I've played about 30 hours and I haven't even completed the single player campaign yet. It's a long game. Can't wait for the other 2.… Expand
  26. JohnR
    Aug 4, 2010
    10
    Boohoo, interface issues exist. Anyone up to date knows that patches will remedy them (like chat functionality being announced for a future patch) - given this, the real issue is the actual core of a game, which has been honed to greatness. "Oh no, it didn't revolutionize the world!" - no game does that. There were FPSes before Counter-strike: true legends just do what they do Boohoo, interface issues exist. Anyone up to date knows that patches will remedy them (like chat functionality being announced for a future patch) - given this, the real issue is the actual core of a game, which has been honed to greatness. "Oh no, it didn't revolutionize the world!" - no game does that. There were FPSes before Counter-strike: true legends just do what they do extremely well, which SC2 does.… Expand
  27. PeterC
    Aug 4, 2010
    8
    I've heard all the arguments against this game, and it always, always, always comes down to one of 4 things 1) Its not as innovative as I thought it would be This is usually in reference to things associated with older RTS's, like base building. Well, its the second game in a series, if it were completely different, people would complain that they're simply trying to ride I've heard all the arguments against this game, and it always, always, always comes down to one of 4 things 1) Its not as innovative as I thought it would be This is usually in reference to things associated with older RTS's, like base building. Well, its the second game in a series, if it were completely different, people would complain that they're simply trying to ride the Starcraft name. The way I see this, it would be like people complaining that diablo 3 has too many dungeons. 2) There's no LAN play. Yes, this is a problem. This is also the reason I dropped the score a bit. I hope they come out with a patch that corrects this particular decision at some point. 3) battlenet is too hard Either you're really, really terrible at the game, or you haven't gotten through the placement matches. I find the game is quite good at putting you into somewhere you're competitive, neither dominating nor dominated. The lowest brackets allow people to start slowly and still have a good chance at winning the match, even without a clear strategy 4) Its only 1/3 of a game No, its not. Most non-rpg games run about 20-30 hours. Thats about what the story mode in starcraft 2 runs. Then there's the multiplayer on top of that. If this were the first game in the series, and blizzard simply announced 2 planned expansions for the other races, I doubt many people would complain about this at all. The other 2 games will be expansions, and so sold at a cheaper price (my guess would be somewhere around $30), and they'll be the same length Overall, I found the story engaging, the gameplay is challenging in the story mode and competitive in multiplayer. There are enough changes from the first game that it feels like a new game, but retains enough similarity that it feels somewhat familiar. A lot of the original strategies are still there, but i see a lot of room for new ones too.… Expand
  28. MaziM
    Aug 5, 2010
    10
    Blizzard has done it again! The anticipation for the arrival of Starcraft II was probably the only negative factor working against the game. However, upon its release, all has been forgiven and forgotten. This game is spectacular. It's vividness in its artistry and its fluidity in the game play together make for a highly addictive and impressionable experience. RTS gaming may not be Blizzard has done it again! The anticipation for the arrival of Starcraft II was probably the only negative factor working against the game. However, upon its release, all has been forgiven and forgotten. This game is spectacular. It's vividness in its artistry and its fluidity in the game play together make for a highly addictive and impressionable experience. RTS gaming may not be as popular today, but the Starcraft franchise continues to resonate in a powerful way within the genre.… Expand
  29. tech953
    Aug 16, 2011
    10
    F@#k you all who said that this game sucks. 82 game critics raved about this thing, and 82 million people raved about this thing and you have the balls to say that it sucks? This games in game graphics are amazing, the story is like an effing blockbuster movie, and the game play ranks among this generations best. Do yourself a favor you no talent hacks. Just admit that you suck at rating games.
  30. Kommissar
    Sep 14, 2010
    10
    This game is by far the best game i have ever played. When compared to other RTS titles it beats everything else by miles; it is the best balanced game on the market and that is NOT debatable. The game runs smoothly on the amazingly new Battle.net 2.0; it doesnt need to have chat rooms as finding friends has never been easier and the matchmaking is brilliant. Offline the gameplay is fun;This game is by far the best game i have ever played. When compared to other RTS titles it beats everything else by miles; it is the best balanced game on the market and that is NOT debatable. The game runs smoothly on the amazingly new Battle.net 2.0; it doesnt need to have chat rooms as finding friends has never been easier and the matchmaking is brilliant. Offline the gameplay is fun; especially with units that don't exist online as they are OP (flame turrets ftw!). So smooth, so fast, so tactically diverse and challenging, and it looks sooo shiny! This game blows everything else out of the water!… Expand
  31. Gamingking007
    Oct 18, 2010
    10
    Best strategy game ever created!!! Love it to death!!! Graphics and voice acting is Macnificent!!!Story line is also really great really loved it!!!Wow!!!
  32. C4K3
    Oct 26, 2010
    8
    It's an alright game, it's not as perfect as some would describe it, but still definitely one of the better games in existence. Singleplayer is dull. Multiplayer is pretty nice. Custom multiplayer is just great.
  33. unpronounceable
    Oct 31, 2010
    10
    Starcraft II is as perfect as an RTS can be. It doesn't have shiny new mechanics like a cover system (Company of Heroes), or customizable squads (Dawn of War), the depth of strategy and gameplay destroys all competition with ease. The only criticism I have for it is the lack of LAN support, but the amazing campaign and challenging multiplayer more than make up for it.
  34. Shaitan87
    Nov 2, 2010
    10
    While the campaign is fun, what sets Starcraft apart is the multiplayer. Extremely competitive fast paced action leads to a very entertaining experience. Getting a couple friends on vent and playing 3v3 is some of the most fun I have had in ages.
  35. Egoecro
    Dec 23, 2010
    8
    Very nice game, a worthy successor to the previous chapter.
    A game that has been adapted to modern needs but with the same parameters as the old one, a lot of news even if the game remains the same as it was, so nothing new or particularly innovative.
    Excellent graphics.
    Beautiful sound.
    Gameplay almost identical to the previous chapter.
  36. BroLuk
    Nov 10, 2010
    10
    The best 2010 game for me. Really good campaign - continuation of StarCraft 1 story and most of all mission (really good made - there isn't 2 same mission in campaign). And the best multiplayer ever - this is true esport.
  37. DebanR
    Nov 17, 2010
    10
    The best RTS ever.
  38. DoctorKilla
    Nov 21, 2010
    10
    Just an complete, quality, fitting, and epic improvement upon the original, StarCraft is the frontrunner for Game of the Year along with God of War III in my eyes.
  39. rev0lutions
    Dec 18, 2010
    8
    First off to all the idiots giving the game a "1" your idiots. I have been gaming for most of my life and while the storyline in sc2 has so far left me completely bored the graphics are good, the music awesome and fitting to the mood of the game and the online gameplay intense. you could never change a classic game like sc too much as the MILLIONS of hardcore fans would spit the dummy soFirst off to all the idiots giving the game a "1" your idiots. I have been gaming for most of my life and while the storyline in sc2 has so far left me completely bored the graphics are good, the music awesome and fitting to the mood of the game and the online gameplay intense. you could never change a classic game like sc too much as the MILLIONS of hardcore fans would spit the dummy so blizzard had a limited range as to what they could actually do with the game. Considering that little fact blizzard has done an amazing job. To all the idiots crying about not having new races... this is because sc1 was the best rts ever made because of the unique balance presented by having 3 different races, introducing any more races would have thrown in sc2 with the million other dime a dozen unbalanced rts games all over the market. those saying the the graphics arnt amazing probably dont have computers capable of running the game on "ultra" and thus miss out on the clean cut, beautiful graphics that keep sc2 a step above the competition.

    I am a diamond player on battle net and the new interface is great in many ways although i dislike not having chat channels or rooms in which to simply discuss things with other players, the chat in sc2 in general is not very good. all round its a quality game and is vastly superior to most other rts games on the market, however it does still have room for improvement, but then, what game doesn't? All up i give sc2 an 8.    … Expand
  40. theone565
    Dec 24, 2010
    10
    Not only does this game build on the original award-winning game from 1998, but this game also brings in more features and drastically improves on the gameplay. If it is possible to take the best and make it better, Starcraft II : Wings of Liberty has done it. With several new abilities that boost the economy, like the terran M.U.L.E. , the zerg queen's spawn larvae ability, and theNot only does this game build on the original award-winning game from 1998, but this game also brings in more features and drastically improves on the gameplay. If it is possible to take the best and make it better, Starcraft II : Wings of Liberty has done it. With several new abilities that boost the economy, like the terran M.U.L.E. , the zerg queen's spawn larvae ability, and the protoss chronoboost ability, it makes building a large number of units quickly very easy. Also, there are several new units, like the terran Thor, the zerg roach, and the protoss stalker. Blizzard has also replaced several unbalanced units with better units, or made unbalanced units balanced. The terran goliath has been replaced with the viking, the zerg mutualisk has increased in price, and the zealot can now sprint towards its target. Blizzard has done it again.… Expand
  41. VentXekart
    Jan 9, 2011
    10
    It was totally worth waiting the ten years of development, I believe this game to be one of the best strategy games to ever be produced by Blizzard Entertainment.
  42. iamportal
    Dec 29, 2010
    10
    I absolutely love this game! The campaign has a few flaws, but is one of the best in the whole RTS genre. The online multiplayer is wonderful, and battle.net 2.0 works perfectly.
  43. Omegamon
    Jan 2, 2011
    9
    I was a Starcraft nut when the first game came out and a number of years after. I used to play it all day with my buddies. So it is pointless to say that i had high hopes for this one. Also I cannot help but compare it to the original Starcraft. Gameplay: The gameplay is good, I think it's actually harder then the first one. A lot of variety and build choices. Speed seems to be theI was a Starcraft nut when the first game came out and a number of years after. I used to play it all day with my buddies. So it is pointless to say that i had high hopes for this one. Also I cannot help but compare it to the original Starcraft. Gameplay: The gameplay is good, I think it's actually harder then the first one. A lot of variety and build choices. Speed seems to be the governing attribute in terms of player qualities required to be proficient at the game, sometimes to the detriment of creativity. This makes established builds dominant especially in the early game, leaving experimentation valid only against weaker players. There seems to be a number of hard counter units in the game which make the rock-paper-scissors aspect of the game more visible. I wish game designers would grow out of this, as rock-paper-scissors is not a good base for strategy games, being a game of luck and all. Story: The single player story sucks big time, it's a generic, "I'm the good guy, the establishment is bad" kind of deal, which wouldn't be that bad by itself though. However the dialog sinks the whole thing as all characters pretty much spew banalities and talk to the camera. To me, the story is what seals my impression of the game. I guess this is what happens when professional writers have to come up with stories for games they are not nuts about. Also speaking of the single player campaign, it is very rigid and consists almost solely of "against the clock" missions. In my book, the single player campaign should allow the user to waste some time and "smell the graphics" and leave the time pressing aspects to the multi-player. Graphics: They are decent, functional, not over the top. Conclusion: Good game, but could use some help with the story which pretty much transforms it into a Hollywood "Pearl Harbor" kind of production.… Expand
  44. maxpower1118
    Jan 4, 2011
    10
    This game is great. period. The storyline is pretty good, and pretty long and all but a few missions are really fun. But in my opinion the main good thing about the game is the multi-player mode. Battlenet 2.0 is really good at finding and pairing you against people who have about your skill level, although rarely you get paired with someone who is way above or below your skill level. IThis game is great. period. The storyline is pretty good, and pretty long and all but a few missions are really fun. But in my opinion the main good thing about the game is the multi-player mode. Battlenet 2.0 is really good at finding and pairing you against people who have about your skill level, although rarely you get paired with someone who is way above or below your skill level. I have never played SC1, but i am very into other RTSs. I play the total war series and age of empires and stuff... everyone who is saying bad things about the game being the same as SC1 is basically complaining about what they asked for. It is NOT all hype. Sure the game is similar to SC1 most likely because that is what people wanted -- SC2, not a new and completely different game with the same title. It is NOT all hype. I went into the game expecting a good game, but not hyped on the SC1 hype, and it delivered a good game.… Expand
  45. Templar19
    Jan 13, 2011
    8
    Starcraft was one of the only games i played years ago, i have been waiting for Starcraft 2 for a LONG time. I ended up spending $60 on the game the day after it came out. Now i was greatly satisfied at first, i really liked the storyline, the cinematics were awesome, the graphics and gameplay were great, but SC2 was lacking in a few different areas, First off, LAN, i love playing LAN andStarcraft was one of the only games i played years ago, i have been waiting for Starcraft 2 for a LONG time. I ended up spending $60 on the game the day after it came out. Now i was greatly satisfied at first, i really liked the storyline, the cinematics were awesome, the graphics and gameplay were great, but SC2 was lacking in a few different areas, First off, LAN, i love playing LAN and just hanging out in a room playing PC games with my friends, But i was extremely dissapointed when i found out that for me and 2 of my friends to play LAN we would have to pay $180, on top of that, i am not able to play singleplayer on my laptop unless i make sure to sign in online on my laptop before i take it somewhere (i play SC2 mostly on my desktop), now i understand the need for anti-piracy, but it is getting to the point where it is pissing me off so much that i almost want to go pirate the game, put it on a CD and give it out to all my friends. Because we all know these protections are easily bipassed. Other than that, the multiplayer is great, lots of good custom maps (a lot are very similar to the first Starcraft) The game has almost all the same units, plays almost exactly the same as the first SC but with better graphics and more features for units and buildings, (some of the units look the same as original ones, just renamed example:Dragoon=Stalker) Fun trying to get all the achievments, this game can last hours if you are really into competative RTS games!… Expand
  46. Nirso
    Jan 28, 2011
    10
    Best game ever. Best multiplayer. Blizzard improve the fantastic StarCraft. Batlle.net is a fabulous system, where you can play with your friends or strangers that are in the same level of you.
  47. cory2704
    Feb 8, 2011
    8
    Starcraft 2 was my first game within the starcraft or even warcraft series, and I have to say it instantly became a favorite of mine in the rts genre. Infact after playing countless command and conquer, and supreme commander games you begin to see where other series have tried building upon starcrafts success by using similar gameplay niches. What these other games failed to do in my eyesStarcraft 2 was my first game within the starcraft or even warcraft series, and I have to say it instantly became a favorite of mine in the rts genre. Infact after playing countless command and conquer, and supreme commander games you begin to see where other series have tried building upon starcrafts success by using similar gameplay niches. What these other games failed to do in my eyes was to be daring and escape from standardized gameplay ( yes I understand games like supreme commander are player on a much larger scale but the idea of resource collection and macroing is pretty much identical)

    however after trialling the original starcraft in the aid of this blog I found that the core mechanics of the game hasnâ    … Expand
  48. pro7otype
    Mar 7, 2011
    8
    This game is solid throughout. Good storyline and great cutscenes in the single player, a good feel to the game in the multiplayer. Great soundtrack and effects. Graphics are reasonably good, but they lack the style and panache of Warhammer 40K's Dawn of War series in my opinion. If you are a Starcraft fanboy you are going to love this, especially all the matchmaking options built into theThis game is solid throughout. Good storyline and great cutscenes in the single player, a good feel to the game in the multiplayer. Great soundtrack and effects. Graphics are reasonably good, but they lack the style and panache of Warhammer 40K's Dawn of War series in my opinion. If you are a Starcraft fanboy you are going to love this, especially all the matchmaking options built into the game, but if you are merely someone who loves good RTS games, you will enjoy this, but you will also see some of its flaws as well, namely: Confused, somewhat messy looking unit models (especially for Terrans) and very little in the way of sense of humour or gimmicks to keep you interested. This is a Solid RTS game through and through.… Expand
  49. Bohdan
    Mar 10, 2011
    8
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. CelkovÄ… Expand
  50. wordy_actions
    Jul 29, 2011
    10
    A good return to the Starcraft universe. The three races that made SC1 such a huge success are back and better than ever. Blizzard has done a very good job of giving each race new strategies and units. As for competitive matches, this game excels. The online functionality is for the most part excellent, but occasionally there are bugs. Fortunately they are usually quickly resolved. TheA good return to the Starcraft universe. The three races that made SC1 such a huge success are back and better than ever. Blizzard has done a very good job of giving each race new strategies and units. As for competitive matches, this game excels. The online functionality is for the most part excellent, but occasionally there are bugs. Fortunately they are usually quickly resolved. The online custom maps are another reason why I'm giving this game a high rating. The editor is amazing, and even more amazing are the things the map-making community is creating. Even though the online competition and the campaign are good, I feel that the custom maps are the best part about the game. Highly recommended to any PC gamer since this game can provide almost endless entertainment.… Expand
  51. hensothor
    Apr 19, 2011
    10
    Lives up to its namesake. I'd say more, but really, 'nuff said. It didn't have to do anything more. The game has the classic gameplay that everyone has grown to love, over a decade while also innovating into a new metagame. This game will last a long time.
  52. Jman5
    Apr 20, 2011
    10
    Having played it for the last 8 months, Starcraft II is a phenomenal game that is a worthy successor to SC1. For fans of Real-Time-Strategy games, this is a must buy. Blizzard does an excellent job of making the game easy to pick up but incredibly hard to master. The most daunting aspect for any buyer is jumping into the multiplayer scene. Many of the players are extremely skilled so itHaving played it for the last 8 months, Starcraft II is a phenomenal game that is a worthy successor to SC1. For fans of Real-Time-Strategy games, this is a must buy. Blizzard does an excellent job of making the game easy to pick up but incredibly hard to master. The most daunting aspect for any buyer is jumping into the multiplayer scene. Many of the players are extremely skilled so it can be discouraging when faced against these people. Blizzard has tried hard to create a robust match making system so players are placed against people of similar skill. For the most part they have succeeded, but there are still plenty of gamers who abuse loopholes to match against beginners.

    If you are looking for a well designed RTS that will no doubt maintain a robust community for years to come, Starcraft 2 is right for you.    … Expand
  53. Crux
    Apr 26, 2011
    10
    Although the game doesn't have the level of polish I would expect from a game of this caliber, it is still incredibly good. I enjoyed the campaign, but really like the focus on multiplayer play. I never got into the first game's multiplayer, but have played many other RTS online, and can say that it is very refreshing to see the level of balance and uniqueness in the units in this game.Although the game doesn't have the level of polish I would expect from a game of this caliber, it is still incredibly good. I enjoyed the campaign, but really like the focus on multiplayer play. I never got into the first game's multiplayer, but have played many other RTS online, and can say that it is very refreshing to see the level of balance and uniqueness in the units in this game. Custom maps keep the game fresh, and I have no major complaints since it came out. Easily the best RTS I have ever played.

    My final score: 9.5/10    … Expand
  54. Zealloux
    May 18, 2011
    10
    Awesome multiplayer, awesome graphics, and awesome RTS gameplay. Challenging gameplay (multiplayer) allows for long periods of game time. Modern port allows for perseverance of the series. It's constantly being updated and has an unlimited amounts of maps (with custom maps). Most importantly it's fun and addictive!
  55. LordOFlibertY
    Jul 8, 2011
    9
    StarCraft 2 must be in every single top 10 strategy game of all time or else the writer is lying. Now what makes this game so great? Balance.
    That's right, not graphics, not gameplay (though they are pretty good) but it is Balance that makes StarCraft 2 the most greatest strategy game. Unfortunatly my only critique is the lack of races to play in Campaign and no LAN option.
  56. Acidosis
    Jun 19, 2011
    8
    Despite the game looking identical to Starcraft when graphics are turned to the lowest settings, just so you know. The development of race's units in this game disappoint me, this is because the lore and race feeling doesn't match at all. Protoss is suppose to be an advance alien race with unmatched technology and yes blizzard did follow the whole Protoss is expensive, slow and powerful inDespite the game looking identical to Starcraft when graphics are turned to the lowest settings, just so you know. The development of race's units in this game disappoint me, this is because the lore and race feeling doesn't match at all. Protoss is suppose to be an advance alien race with unmatched technology and yes blizzard did follow the whole Protoss is expensive, slow and powerful in the first Starcraft but in Starcraft 2 Protoss races seems to be having some sort of recession. Its grand highly advance technological ships are the worst among the three races as it does average damage and doesn't tank well due to the whole rock, paper, scissors armor system implemented. For the Zerg, in Starcraft 2 Zerg has lost its evil feeling and that drones and overlord looks damn pretty cute and its trademark unit their Hydralisk unit has become nothing more than worthless, Terran in Starcraft 2 seems to have when crazy on their research and remove units which are not suppose to remove and adding units which will never be used. Also constant "nerfing" of siege tank makes a tank firepower as powerful as a alien claw....like come on, a tank fire as good as an alien scratch? As much as i enjoy Starcraft 2, i do feel that the whole rock, paper, scissors armor system did spoil the game. It isn't no longer about strategy and attacking but instead it is about waiting and defending then countering back with enemies weakness which could turn veteran's off like me. Starcraft 2 has also became so user friendly that even four old can play it which is a joke. Despite all the criticism, i would say i do still enjoy playing the game because after all, i waited for also 10 years for the game.… Expand
  57. appabend
    Feb 10, 2012
    8
    STARCRAFT II: Where do I start? Oh, I'm reviewing this game before the next expansion came out. I think when you really love the original StarCraft, then this one is a great recommendation. I'm not a big fan of RTS genre, but I do love some of their games like AoE, Rise of Nations, Empire Earth, and now this. StarCraft II is one of the best modern RTS game. Well, there are some RTS gamesSTARCRAFT II: Where do I start? Oh, I'm reviewing this game before the next expansion came out. I think when you really love the original StarCraft, then this one is a great recommendation. I'm not a big fan of RTS genre, but I do love some of their games like AoE, Rise of Nations, Empire Earth, and now this. StarCraft II is one of the best modern RTS game. Well, there are some RTS games that can top up StarCraft II, but it's great on it's own. All the things that I have to note are probably the most awesome cut scenes on a Real Time Strategy game, realistic graphics and sound effects with great music too, great voice acting, and most importantly, great gameplay. Maybe because I'm not a big fan of the genre, I can't enjoy the game that much. So far, I haven't tried multiplayer yet probably because I played this game on my Uncle's PC.… Expand
  58. Xrinor
    Jul 8, 2011
    10
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This a right way of Real-Time Strategy game. Remain the game-play of resource gathering and base building. LAN play has been removed, this is a good way to anti-piracy.… Expand
  59. DeadlyCornbread
    Jul 12, 2011
    10
    I've come to expect a lot out of Blizzard since i first started playing their games (I started with Warcraft 2). And with each release (except World of Warcraft, I do not play MMORPG's) they take what I expect, and add even more. Starcraft 2 exceeds all of my expectations and adds things I never knew I needed.

    The control interface is extremely important in RTS games and this is one is    I've come to expect a lot out of Blizzard since i first started playing their games (I started with Warcraft 2). And with each release (except World of Warcraft, I do not play MMORPG's) they take what I expect, and add even more. Starcraft 2 exceeds all of my expectations and adds things I never knew I needed.

    The control interface is extremely important in RTS games and this is one is hands down one of the easiest to use, and as precise as a razor. Using the tab key to select different unit types within a control group was ingenious. Hot keys bound to similar keys throughout all the armies, no more remembering what the ability is called to use it. But typically E is engage and D is disengage. And the presentations is beautiful. Not only this, but it is extremely smooth for the amount of action the game shows onscreen. Just look at gameplay videos and screenshots to see how great it looks.

    Better yet, the multiplayer is addictive and fun. New units have arrived, and they fill multiple roles. Vultures and firebats are NOT in multiplayer, instead they are replaced by a Hellion that fills both roles in one unit. There are many more instances like this, but I'm not going to carry on with all the changes. And custom maps are there to give you fresh change of pace and play some interesting maps that are sometimes nothing like the original game.

    In the end the singleplayer is engaging and fun, the mulitplayer will keep you coming back for more, the graphics are slick and smooth, all coming together to create a game well worth it's cost, and another heavy hitter title under Blizzard's belt. Absolutely worth getting!    … Expand
  60. lordjrs
    Jan 22, 2012
    10
    StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty is the sequel to the big eSport ever made, and what a sequel. It features modern graphics, new units, new maps, classic maps reworked, all this makes the best eSport ever. And i'm just talking about multiplayer. The campaign have great missions, beautiful cinematics, and a great plot. Waiting for Heart of the Swarm :P
  61. Apollo
    Jul 25, 2011
    10
    Best RTS ever made. Better than sc1 in every way. This game is hands down the greatest game ever made. Everything about the original was improved to a great degree, from match making to game balance. The new units add a lot of new strategies as do new mechanics such as destructible rocks, xel'naga watch towers and the addition of a second gas node at every base.
  62. Aodecim
    Jul 30, 2011
    9
    A worthy successor to the Starcraft series....The single-player campaign uses a new system that offers development and individual gameplay style progression with caters to RPG fans and RTS fans alike. The story was slightly drab but the mission scenarios were enough to keep the game entertaining. Combined with Blizzard's infamous map editor tools, this game's multiplayer functions areA worthy successor to the Starcraft series....The single-player campaign uses a new system that offers development and individual gameplay style progression with caters to RPG fans and RTS fans alike. The story was slightly drab but the mission scenarios were enough to keep the game entertaining. Combined with Blizzard's infamous map editor tools, this game's multiplayer functions are almost as limitless as Minecraft's creativity.… Expand
  63. CivBase
    Sep 16, 2011
    10
    As if this needs another 10. It has the best RTS story I've ever seen. Starcraft is one of those few RTS games that actually understand what the "S" stands for. Units are perfectly balanced and the counters are simply genious. It allows for many different playing styles without giving anyone an advantage. In addition, the super-powerful map editor gives players an unlimited amount ofAs if this needs another 10. It has the best RTS story I've ever seen. Starcraft is one of those few RTS games that actually understand what the "S" stands for. Units are perfectly balanced and the counters are simply genious. It allows for many different playing styles without giving anyone an advantage. In addition, the super-powerful map editor gives players an unlimited amount of replay value once they make their way to the custom games list. Starcraft is the best RTS game on the market and you'd be a fool to think otherwise.… Expand
  64. Olivrar
    Sep 17, 2011
    9
    Starcraft II, where to begin? I've been reading all these negative and mixed reviews and they all go along the lines of something saying "Too many counters, unbalanced, too competitive, segregates community, pro's play pro's, newbies stay bad". My response to that? You're bad and you will stay bad.

    The multiplayer segment of Starcraft II isn't like any other RTS. People can cry all day    Starcraft II, where to begin? I've been reading all these negative and mixed reviews and they all go along the lines of something saying "Too many counters, unbalanced, too competitive, segregates community, pro's play pro's, newbies stay bad". My response to that? You're bad and you will stay bad.

    The multiplayer segment of Starcraft II isn't like any other RTS. People can cry all day saying how a unit or race is overpowered but they really aren't. When a unit is deemed overpowered, it quickly gets nerfed as metagame changes. This isn't some bullshi*t RTS where you get the super unit and you win, this is a game of pure wits and pure logical thinking, no one strategy or one unit will let you win. The time for passive RTS is over, Starcraft II brings thinking in an RTS to a whole new level.

    Furthermore, the way some of these negative reviews begin to post slander saying that "baddies stay bad, pro's stay pro" is pure nonsense. I bought this game about a month ago and this was the second RTS i've ever played, first being Age of Empires II many years ago. I eagerly did my ladder games and got placed into bronze. After many hours of dedication and hardwork, I worked my way up all the way to platinum. Newbies who join the game will not stay bad, Pro's will not stay pro. If you have a fickle mindset and can't be bothered to work at anything, you'll suck at this game and pretty much anything in life.

    It's harsh and it's true. Starcraft II multiplayer requires 100% mental focus and an extreme desire to play it in order to get better. Don't fool yourself into thinking you can get to a high league without work!    … Expand
  65. MikefromAngus
    Oct 4, 2011
    10
    A game that I sitll play once a week, after more then an year after its release is an amazing thing!
    Campaign was fun! but multiplayer got me hooked! great game!
  66. Dan341
    Oct 25, 2011
    10
    This game is more than worthy of being the successor to one of my all time favorites. As expected, Blizzard delivers! Every aspect is outstanding. The only gripes I can come up with was that you could not turn the game speed down on Hard mode... which makes it more frustrating than difficult trying to manage 10 things at the same time. Players not familiar with the original wouldn'tThis game is more than worthy of being the successor to one of my all time favorites. As expected, Blizzard delivers! Every aspect is outstanding. The only gripes I can come up with was that you could not turn the game speed down on Hard mode... which makes it more frustrating than difficult trying to manage 10 things at the same time. Players not familiar with the original wouldn't get the hype. One really should play the original in its entirety before taking on this gem of a game. I do not consider the multi-player aspects in this review. It forces one to use Battle.Net, which isn't really a bad thing for the majority of players.… Expand
  67. Daedalus333
    Nov 16, 2011
    10
    This is truly the real masterpiece everyone's talking about. If you have any interess in Blizzard's games or RTS type of games, get this at all cost !
  68. John1
    Oct 28, 2011
    10
    This is the best polished RTS game out there. The game is very stable and very enjoyable to play, and even more enjoyable to watch professional games.
  69. Scoobydruid
    Oct 28, 2011
    10
    Fantastic game. The campaign is fun and unlocking objectives is engaging. The on-line matching system is good at finding you a suitable opponent once you've played some games. Lots of things to do in SC2 so the value for $60 is maximum. There are also plenty of websites that you can look at to learn to play better.
  70. dobserver
    Nov 8, 2011
    8
    Starcraft was one of the first games I've ever played next to Final Fantasy which brought me into the world of gaming. So I had high expectations for Starcraft II - especially since it took so long to release. Starcraft II is not a bad game, but definitely has room for improvement. In terms of the Single Player, they have made it a lot more interesting - taking multiple routes, upgradesStarcraft was one of the first games I've ever played next to Final Fantasy which brought me into the world of gaming. So I had high expectations for Starcraft II - especially since it took so long to release. Starcraft II is not a bad game, but definitely has room for improvement. In terms of the Single Player, they have made it a lot more interesting - taking multiple routes, upgrades and achievements - which all help enhance the playability of the Single Player. The original story was interesting and the Starcraft II story doesn't disappoint. (Not surprising since there is an entire series of novels...) The voice acting was pretty good and I didn't expect much character development for an RTS so it was a bit lacking in that area. They also assume that you're familiar with Starcraft lore and have played the first game. Single player was nicely done, especially for an RTS with a predecessor. The efforts to make it original paid off. Lots of new units, new buildings, new functions and a completely new balance. Which allows for new strategies to be created. This brings us into the multiplayer. I actually liked the single player more because of the customization, and it would have been cool to move this aspect over to the multiplayer but I guess that would complicate the balance of team games rather drastically. The difference in units from the original Starcraft made the multiplayer experience brand new. They seem to have upped the pace of the game so that it wouldn't take as long but the fundamentals of building a sound economy are still there. I played a lot of the multiplayer during Beta and found the existence of some balancing issues still there, but I know they'll be fixing these with patches. The matching and ranking system are a nice addition as well as the improved co-op vs. AI. Achievements made playing SC2 more fun and less of a chore. I found the game to be a bit newbie centered, as in some newbies were able to beat some veteran RTS players because of unit composition, even though the veteran had superior micro and macro management. I noticed this trend to decrease over time through the patches Blizzard has been periodically implementing. Overall a very solid game, but perhaps lacks some of the innovative features of new RTS games that make it exceptional. Splitting the game into 3 games (one for each race) is also very annoying. I don't like that way of marketing even though it increases sales. But I will wait till the other two parts are released and reserve my judgement. Depending on the price tag and the changes it might be justified.… Expand
  71. BladeFlare
    Dec 5, 2011
    8
    this game is pretty good. ITS great. but bad enough to get an 8. this game was awesome when i first got it. i loved it and had a blast with my friends about the custom maps and how great the game was. but there are so many ways to break the game its ridiculous. im looking at you zerg. the game was boring i felt without friends with you and when they stopped i tried to continue but it justthis game is pretty good. ITS great. but bad enough to get an 8. this game was awesome when i first got it. i loved it and had a blast with my friends about the custom maps and how great the game was. but there are so many ways to break the game its ridiculous. im looking at you zerg. the game was boring i felt without friends with you and when they stopped i tried to continue but it just wasnt that fun anymore. dont get me wrong but this game just became a game that didnt last long at all. still a great game, just not the best in my opinion. but when i see people saying that this game is like a copy of the origonal, i think to myself and say that the game fixed some things that needed to be done. 1. The game needed a remake, all of the games minor details that at the time were good, are ridiculously outdated now and just need to be fixed because that was the big flaw of the game, not game play but that its outdated.

    2. A game becomes less and less popular as it gets older and more outdated. what better way to fix that then to hype a sequel and boost its popularity. starcraft is not an old game anymore.

    3. Their actually were some major changes in the game, units were added, modified, and removed, and in a game like starcraft that massively changes the game. they can't add too much because they still want starcraft. and keep in mind that if you dont want a sequel to be the same or similiar, that it brakes the game because its supposed to be similiar. jut play another game if you want a different game, they kept it starcraft, but added a 2. Cod has no excuse though because they have don this like 3 times now.
    Overall starcraft 2 was made exactly how and when it was made.    … Expand
  72. MercilessMonkey
    Feb 11, 2012
    8
    Fairly obviously the best RTS out there at the moment, especially in a competitive context. Campaign is good as to be expected from blizz, gameplay is fun and polished. The only knock would be for their constant failure to balance the game in a reasonable time frame.
  73. Krepost
    May 7, 2012
    9
    The epitome of all strategy games. The rush of the online gaming experience is unmatched in any other game period. The community is awesome. The graphics are awesome. The balance is awesome. If you even think you might like RTS games a little bit, shell out the money for this game. It never gets old, and never loses its shine. The trouble is that SC2 has a 90 degree angle learning curve,The epitome of all strategy games. The rush of the online gaming experience is unmatched in any other game period. The community is awesome. The graphics are awesome. The balance is awesome. If you even think you might like RTS games a little bit, shell out the money for this game. It never gets old, and never loses its shine. The trouble is that SC2 has a 90 degree angle learning curve, it takes a very long time to become good at it, so don't expect to be a pro in a week, if you want to become an expert, it will take time, or you can just be like me and fool around in team games in the gold league, nice and casual. There's a niche for everyone here, so I would say go and grab the game. It's awesome.… Expand
  74. Kosheus
    Feb 28, 2012
    9
    Technically the best classic RTS now. Best custom game platform too.
    But it lacks SC1 atmosphere=(. Also there is very stupid campain (storywise) with very interesting (IMHO) custommaps-like missions.
    Anyway, this is the state of art classic RTS.
  75. ChoicestGames
    Mar 3, 2012
    9
    Blizzard have taken the usual "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" approach and even though the graphics and gameplay haven't changed much, the epic and immersive sci-fi story more than makes up for it. Bring on the expansions (hopefully at a decent price)!
  76. blackbrrd
    Jul 11, 2012
    8
    Starcraft 2 is the best of it's genre, but the focus is relatively narrow. It's more or less entirely skill based when it comes to online 1v1 play which is very impressive. I didn't think the campaign was that good though.
  77. faceless-1
    Nov 24, 2013
    9
    Starcraft 2 is really a great game. Story mode is really great and multiplayer is old Starcraft with better controls. I was really hoping for some new race, but in the end it does not matter and old races are enough.
  78. Mordread
    Oct 10, 2012
    9
    Just what I wanted from the sequel to Starcraft, this installment is basically the old game with new graphics and a few minor improvements. The campaign isn't that great but the multiplayer is good fun especially if you got friends who play. The worst part about this game is the terrible match making and ranking system... as with all Blizzard games your rank means nothing and hidden matchJust what I wanted from the sequel to Starcraft, this installment is basically the old game with new graphics and a few minor improvements. The campaign isn't that great but the multiplayer is good fun especially if you got friends who play. The worst part about this game is the terrible match making and ranking system... as with all Blizzard games your rank means nothing and hidden match making value is all that matters which is annoying. The ranking system promotes time played and not skill as with all Blizzards games unfortunately. Still a good game though but I am very much against the multiple releases for the different campaigns and am not so sure if I will get the expansions. The campaign is not really worth the cost of the game. If multiplayer is not your thing, there are much better games then this for you.… Expand
  79. Marmalade
    Sep 29, 2012
    8
    I played the original Starcraft and spent many late nights playing, only to be made aware of how long I was playing by the sun coming in through the window. LOL! I was very impressed with the quality of this game. The updated graphics retain the quality and feel of the original and the addition of achievements and portraits give you some added incentive to keep playing in Multiplayer.I played the original Starcraft and spent many late nights playing, only to be made aware of how long I was playing by the sun coming in through the window. LOL! I was very impressed with the quality of this game. The updated graphics retain the quality and feel of the original and the addition of achievements and portraits give you some added incentive to keep playing in Multiplayer. Fortunately, Blizzard gives new players of the franchise several flashbacks of what happened in the original game, so you won't be completely lost. If you get bored with multiplayer, there are many player-made arcade versions of the game that are high quality and ingeniously made. My only gripe is the cheating in the multiplayer leagues - diamond/platinum players who play professionally deliberately qualify for lower leagues so they can farm portraits and achievements, so it makes it more difficult for people in the bronze/silver leagues to progress as far as standings/achievements go, but hopefully that will end once these players with insane talent get their achievements and move on. LOL! Overall, a fantastic game.… Expand
  80. Eddard
    Nov 28, 2012
    9
    Starcraft 2 is the sequel of the greatest RTS game in the world. The Expectations on Blizzard were very big. But thes did their Job very well und created the new Star at the RTS-Heaven. I only give 9 of 10 because i don't like the Story-Mode. Starcaft is a Only-Multiplayer-Game
  81. UnderTheSun
    Dec 8, 2012
    9
    Outstanding game, my only complain would be that the campaign is raher short. I'm looking forward the expansion(s). Multi-player gaming would justify the buy on its own.
  82. Toffenuff
    Dec 7, 2012
    8
    First and foremost, I am an avid Starcraft fan and have played the original Starcraft as well as Brood War countless times for many days worth of hours played. That said, I was also a little skeptical at first about how the new Starcraft game would turn out. The campaign was... not as great as I thought it would be. The story was somewhat blah and predictable. As far as presentation andFirst and foremost, I am an avid Starcraft fan and have played the original Starcraft as well as Brood War countless times for many days worth of hours played. That said, I was also a little skeptical at first about how the new Starcraft game would turn out. The campaign was... not as great as I thought it would be. The story was somewhat blah and predictable. As far as presentation and graphics, the game gets an A+ (at least compared to the old Starcraft; in terms of comparisons to other games today, it's about average I'd say). Multiplayer is still fun, but one thing I really did not like was the inability to have local LAN play instead of having to connect to the Blizzard servers all the time. The greatest thing about Starcraft's continued replayability all these years was that you could get a bunch of your buddies together or go to an internet gaming cafe (anywhere besides the US) and play Starcraft on a local network without having to deal with lag or server downtimes or malfunctions. You used to be able to play offline, even though it was supposed to be a online-only experience. Now it appears they've taken away offline play, so that docks more points from the rating. You shouldn't need an internet connection in order to play the game, it's that simple.
    To conclude, I am happy with the game but not as happy as I expected to be. Still would recommend getting this game, and hopefully with Heart of the Swarm they will have made a better game.    … Expand
  83. zombiechan
    Sep 29, 2014
    9
    A really good game, a sequel to my favorite rts, they kept the competitive feel while adding more features making the game a lot better than the one in my past. It's probably the only game from Blizzard that I had zero issues with.
  84. DREST
    Sep 3, 2015
    10
    Great graphics and beautiful cutscenes, great gameplay, great campaign missions and great and enjoyable continuation to the story from the first one. It's really a great game.
  85. jelikey
    Sep 10, 2015
    10
    I was bought this for my twenty seventh birthday by my friends and initially I thought the mechanics were weak - throw down some 'rax and hold 'a'... follow this up with an all in at 5 or 6... This tactic was applied by and against us successfully until we became able to defend and give a proper account.
  86. WarcraftAwesome
    Nov 20, 2014
    10
    First of all, this game is probably one of the best games I've ever played. Along with its multiplayer, competitions as well as real time strategy, it's no wonder it is one of the best Real Time Strategy games in the market.
  87. Robb-Fury
    Jan 12, 2015
    9
    Well then where do I start? Do you like StarCraft? Do you like Blizzard? Do you like RTS? Are you korean? Are you human? If you answered yes to any of these questions then buy this game right away! It takes everything the original Starcraft did and cranked it to 11. The graphics while not Crysis are still stunning the gameplay runs smooth as silk, even if you average 400 APM. The story isWell then where do I start? Do you like StarCraft? Do you like Blizzard? Do you like RTS? Are you korean? Are you human? If you answered yes to any of these questions then buy this game right away! It takes everything the original Starcraft did and cranked it to 11. The graphics while not Crysis are still stunning the gameplay runs smooth as silk, even if you average 400 APM. The story is magnificent. the multiplayer is still a god amongst games. (Even when you get pwned by Koreans). There isn't much I can say about this game that hasn't been said, sure there are a few balance issues (Brotoss, Marauders etc..) that should just add to the challenge and make you get good. In conclusion to this short review i would say buy it because it is probably one of the best games in the world right now this review has been made short purely because I wouldn't do this game any justice, just play it and see what I mean.… Expand
  88. Lolzorz11
    Apr 29, 2015
    10
    Test review please ignore Test review please ignore Test review please ignore Test review please ignore Test review please ignore Test review please ignore Test review please ignore
  89. Thecod796
    Nov 12, 2015
    10
    this game is so returded MINECR%AFT IS BETTAER RRRRRRRRthis game is so returded MINECR%AFT IS BETTAER RRRRRRRRthis game is so returded MINECR%AFT IS BETTAER RRRRRRRRthis game is so returded MINECR%AFT IS BETTAER RRRRRRRRthis game is so returded MINECR%AFT IS BETTAER RRRRRRRRthis game is so returded MINECR%AFT IS BETTAER RRRRRRRRthis game is so returded MINECR%AFT IS BETTAERthis game is so returded MINECR%AFT IS BETTAER RRRRRRRRthis game is so returded MINECR%AFT IS BETTAER RRRRRRRRthis game is so returded MINECR%AFT IS BETTAER RRRRRRRRthis game is so returded MINECR%AFT IS BETTAER RRRRRRRRthis game is so returded MINECR%AFT IS BETTAER RRRRRRRRthis game is so returded MINECR%AFT IS BETTAER RRRRRRRRthis game is so returded MINECR%AFT IS BETTAER RRRRRRRRthis game is so returded MINECR%AFT IS BETTAER RRRRRRRRthis game is so returded MINECR%AFT IS BETTAER RRRRRRRRthis game is so returded MINECR%AFT IS BETTAER RRRRRRRRthis game is so returded MINECR%AFT IS BETTAER RRRRRRRRthis game is so returded MINECR%AFT IS BETTAER RRRRRRRR… Expand
  90. ThecriticGoD
    Mar 7, 2016
    9
    The proof that RTS games can still be good nowadays. It's not as good as Starcraft : broodwar, gameplay-wise or story-wise but it's definetely really cool visually, very entertaining and it's a lot of fun to learn to master all 3 races, also the multiplayer is extremely competitive.
  91. infestedasuka
    Mar 3, 2017
    10
    People who criticize Starcraft 2 probably lack the ability to play it. The learning curve is huge. The ingenious way in which the metagame was developed by players and developers is amazing. Balancing has always been an issue but they put work into it. In the end, someone will always complain about this and that. The story was amazing, although somethings could have been better developed.People who criticize Starcraft 2 probably lack the ability to play it. The learning curve is huge. The ingenious way in which the metagame was developed by players and developers is amazing. Balancing has always been an issue but they put work into it. In the end, someone will always complain about this and that. The story was amazing, although somethings could have been better developed. Overall, a must have game.… Expand
  92. FabricioNery
    Mar 7, 2022
    10
    The best game of its kind, with a very good story and captivating characters in a strategy game. With excellent balance between troops
  93. KyleG
    Jul 29, 2010
    10
    Balanced multiplayer (people playing otherwise should give some time to adjust to the different races' gameplay styles before making sweeping claims about balance) and an incredibly deep pool of available strategies for each race leads to one of the best multiplayer experiences in years. Blizzard did it again. Flawless. I will definitely be playing this for years to come.
  94. Roman
    Jul 29, 2010
    10
    This game is absolutely amazing, they campaign is great and the multiplayer is outstanding.
  95. CMueller
    Jul 29, 2010
    10
    I am running a system that is almost 7 years old with this game. I have to run with some lower setting, but tearing and lag seem to still be minimal. As a huge fan of the previous title I am glad to see Blizzard has made the gorgeous game accessible even to players with a smaller budget.
  96. AdamP.
    Jul 29, 2010
    10
    Perfect RTS game, amazing sequel! The single player is a lot better then in the first game, even the multiplayer got some new modes like 3v3 and 4v4 (finally some dedicated maps for these modes besides FFA maps). Great cinematics, awesome cutscenes on the Hyperion, insane map editor. Best Blizzard game so far and best RTS in years! Can't wait for the expansions. EPIC!
  97. Jonny
    Jul 29, 2010
    10
    I must agree that the 12 year wait has not been wasted. For the first time ever, I am TRULY impressed in the detail, sounds, missions, etc. A couple of the cinematics were so epic, I had shivers and goosebumps...A first for me, and I've been playing games all my life. It is the most polished, ready-to-go game on release I've ever experienced, and the wait and price ell worth the I must agree that the 12 year wait has not been wasted. For the first time ever, I am TRULY impressed in the detail, sounds, missions, etc. A couple of the cinematics were so epic, I had shivers and goosebumps...A first for me, and I've been playing games all my life. It is the most polished, ready-to-go game on release I've ever experienced, and the wait and price ell worth the admission. And with future patches and additions, it's only going to get better.… Expand
  98. Maladjester
    Jul 29, 2010
    10
    I would like to say something to all the people rating this game a 0: If you thought Blizzard would "reinvent the RTS genre" or other such thing, you weren't paying attention. History shows their strategy very well. What they do is polish an existing concept....and polish it, and polish it, and polish it. It's what they did in 1998 with StarCraft 1, and again with WoW, and now I would like to say something to all the people rating this game a 0: If you thought Blizzard would "reinvent the RTS genre" or other such thing, you weren't paying attention. History shows their strategy very well. What they do is polish an existing concept....and polish it, and polish it, and polish it. It's what they did in 1998 with StarCraft 1, and again with WoW, and now again with StarCraft 2. I've got no complaints. What game were you expecting?… Expand
  99. MichaelH
    Jul 30, 2010
    10
    A perfect RTS. Very similar to the original, and for a good reason. The balancing is near-perfect, any pro would say the same. And it runs beautifully on nearly any machine. Except for Gary K's 1999 Windows ME antique. I have it running at low on my friend's laptop; Pentium 4, integrated graphics, and 1gb of ram. 40fps. On MY computer (high settings, 100fps), the game looks A perfect RTS. Very similar to the original, and for a good reason. The balancing is near-perfect, any pro would say the same. And it runs beautifully on nearly any machine. Except for Gary K's 1999 Windows ME antique. I have it running at low on my friend's laptop; Pentium 4, integrated graphics, and 1gb of ram. 40fps. On MY computer (high settings, 100fps), the game looks AMAZING. Beautiful. Buy this.… Expand
  100. MLittle
    Jul 31, 2010
    10
    If the quality of this game extends into its two expansions, this will be the finest game in its genre. The multiplayer aspect of the game is so enthralling that I fully expect to spend countless hours working my way up to diamond league, and then staying there.
Page:

Awards & Rankings

2
#2 Best PC Game of 2010
2
#2 Most Discussed PC Game of 2010
5
#5 Most Shared PC Game of 2010

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
93

Universal acclaim - based on 82 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 82 out of 82
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 82
  3. Negative: 0 out of 82
  1. PC Zone UK
    Jan 18, 2011
    95
    "Quotation Forthcoming"
  2. Video Game Talk
    Jan 18, 2011
    90
    If you are into real time strategy in any form, it's hard to ignore Starcraft II.
    Read full review
  3. PC Format
    Dec 24, 2010
    93
    Perfectly balanced multiplayer with old school elements intact, and rich and dynamic single player campaigns. [Issue#244, p.102]
See all critic reviews »