RAGE

 PC
User Score
5.4

Mixed or average reviews- based on 1788 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 633 out of 1788
  2. Mixed: 490 out of 1788
  3. Negative: 665 out of 1788
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. alexThunder
    Oct 8, 2011
    0
    I just registered because I wanted to warn PC gamers. I'm using Win7 64 and the game freezes with every step I make for ~10 seconds, even the hardest fanboy couldn't play with that handicap. Also there are A LOT of texture pop-ups - if you turn, textures will take 2-3 seconds to fully load.

    I also tried it to run under Ubuntu 11.10 64 (Linux) with wine 1.3.29, which ran much better - the    I just registered because I wanted to warn PC gamers. I'm using Win7 64 and the game freezes with every step I make for ~10 seconds, even the hardest fanboy couldn't play with that handicap. Also there are A LOT of texture pop-ups - if you turn, textures will take 2-3 seconds to fully load.

    I also tried it to run under Ubuntu 11.10 64 (Linux) with wine 1.3.29, which ran much better - the textures loaded within less than 1 second (but they still pop-up), the freezes are gone, but now it crashes, wenn I enter the world and walk a few steps (after the first cutscene after exiting the ark is finished).

    For 2 days now I nearly searched the whole internet and noticed, that there are tons of gamers having the same issues like me, and even more people having a lot of other issues, which make the game absolutely unplayable. I tried every workaround I could find on both, Windows and Linux, but nothing helped :/

    I was a HUGE fan of id software and usually I'm ok with tinkering around for some games to work. But if there's absolutely no way of getting it to work fine, how can I give more than 0 points?

    I'm sorry for this, but the people responsible for these issues need to get a slap.    … Expand
  2. Joedeecee
    Oct 9, 2011
    0
    Et voila comme d' habitude on se fait entuber par ces developpeurs comme id software et compagnie...
    Il me font vomir de dégout, franchement a part ce faire leurs cheques sur notre dos hein?! Carmack tu trouves que le pc n'est pas une plateforme majeure? ne sors pas de jeux dessus! sob!
  3. Chapa9dj
    Oct 8, 2011
    0
    The game works well, all maxed out 60fps, etc, but the textures looks ugly as hell and its all buggy. This feels like an unfinished product. An insult to those of us who been waiting 5 years.
    ID Tech 5 is absolutely horrible, even Doom 3 looks better than this.

    Please stay away from this horrible abomination, don't make the same mistake i did. Save your $60 bucks and spend it in some other game.
  4. HighwayUK
    Oct 9, 2011
    4
    More bugs than a david attenborough nature documentary, utter stupid multiplayer modes (seriously they make a driving game the focus for multi on a FPS???) then make a 1gb patch a week after release that doesnt even fix most of the issues. The game looks like a piece of crap from 6 years ago even on a high end rig.
  5. shiny313
    Oct 29, 2011
    0
    do not buy this one.
    this is rage.

    rage makes just rage.

    dont even think to buy this one..

    anyway, u buy this one, u cant play.

    maybe? it`s better to u.

    because it`s just 3D flash game.
  6. Ursadorable
    Oct 9, 2011
    1
    Extremely buggy, even with latest tuned drivers. This game was so overhyped, yet turned out to be a borderlands clone, but less enjoyable. Half my time was spent trying to get the game to run. Sorry Id, I won't be wasting another gaming dollar on your consolized ports.
  7. qzip
    Oct 9, 2011
    1
    Well, this game is complete disappointment. Even if forget about unplayable bugs (I managed to launch Rage with acceptable graphics only after I edited .cfg file manually... it's probably acceptable for a alpha version of small program created by schoolboy but not for a $60 game) the story line is really dull and the game world small and boring, filled with invisible walls and lockedWell, this game is complete disappointment. Even if forget about unplayable bugs (I managed to launch Rage with acceptable graphics only after I edited .cfg file manually... it's probably acceptable for a alpha version of small program created by schoolboy but not for a $60 game) the story line is really dull and the game world small and boring, filled with invisible walls and locked doors. Also, Rage looks like a exact copy of Borderlands, but a really bad copy. Rage isn't worth it's current price, $15 is the maximum price for that junk. I wouldn't recommend this game to anyone.… Expand
  8. Rokossovski
    Oct 9, 2011
    0
    I pre-ordered Rage because I trusted ID Software and Bethesda and was looking forward to a great PC game. I checked my system requirements, OK, and downloaded the latest AMD drivers, OK. However instead of enjoying a great game, I'm tweaking and reading the internet and learn about the memory of textures, v-sync etc. But did I pay 50 euros for that? To me this is the moral bankruptcy of IDI pre-ordered Rage because I trusted ID Software and Bethesda and was looking forward to a great PC game. I checked my system requirements, OK, and downloaded the latest AMD drivers, OK. However instead of enjoying a great game, I'm tweaking and reading the internet and learn about the memory of textures, v-sync etc. But did I pay 50 euros for that? To me this is the moral bankruptcy of ID Software, don't they have QA department?… Expand
  9. VerbalEarthworm
    Oct 9, 2011
    0
    I opened this account just to give this a big fat juicy zero...
    it would have scored 3 based on content alone but it gets:
    -1 for making me update both the game and the drivers twice just to be able to play it, -1 for happily taking my money for an unfinished product and
    -1 for a pathetic port.
    = 0

    i really really have to stop pre-ordering games...
  10. DrIron
    Oct 9, 2011
    0
    First off, what did Rage get right? Well, graphically, it's pretty good. It's not -amazing-, there are better looking PC games. Welp, that's all for that section.

    The game a broken mess of a 360 port to PC. The graphical settings are as follows: Anti-aliasing, resolution, brightness. I didn't miss an option. There's massive texture tearing issues, even on a high end PC that can run Crysis    First off, what did Rage get right? Well, graphically, it's pretty good. It's not -amazing-, there are better looking PC games. Welp, that's all for that section.

    The game a broken mess of a 360 port to PC. The graphical settings are as follows: Anti-aliasing, resolution, brightness. I didn't miss an option.
    There's massive texture tearing issues, even on a high end PC that can run Crysis 2 on ultra you're going to have framerate issues, it's got more bugs than Daikatana, texture caching is completely broken, the story is unoriginal as hell, the game is way more linear than id's been claiming...

    I'd advise against even getting it if it was free. It's near unplayable, and it'll hog around 20 gigs of space on your HDD. I think this might honestly be the worst big budget game I've seen in the last few years.    … Expand
  11. joemama
    Oct 11, 2011
    4
    Pros: Decent NPC animations. Interesting mix of weapons/ammo. Good sound(except vehicles)
    Cons: Minimal, irrelevant story. Unoriginal setting/scenario. Extremely linear level design . Average graphics when rendered properly. Predictable gameplay. No fun factor.
    As a strict FPS it's standard fare. For me, the ending seemed to be a fitting match for my overall experience - uninspired.    Pros: Decent NPC animations. Interesting mix of weapons/ammo. Good sound(except vehicles)
    Cons: Minimal, irrelevant story. Unoriginal setting/scenario. Extremely linear level design . Average graphics when rendered properly. Predictable gameplay. No fun factor.
    As a strict FPS it's standard fare. For me, the ending seemed to be a fitting match for my overall experience - uninspired.
    Definitely seems catered to the console market.



    Once again disappointed by a release I was looking forward to(this and Brink).    … Expand
  12. JamesSteal
    Oct 15, 2011
    0
    This game should serve as a reminder to all of those who foolishly pre-order or purchase games before viewing the reviews and ending up disappointed in the final product.
  13. JunglePredator
    Oct 15, 2011
    1
    I scored this at a 1 because I haven't played it but it doesn't look that interesting... point's moot however because at $60 USD... I can't AFFORD to play it. And so... here's your 1 for being "out of reach" of casual players.
  14. Nehaxak
    Oct 16, 2011
    1
    Wow, this game is so bad even metacritic are removing negative reviews now.
    Let me just state, once again, before metacritic remove this review again also, that this game contains NO multiplayer of any significance at all, nothing. There is a co-op and a "invite your friends" type of rubbish multiplayer along with a stupid racing multiplayer (why?!??) but there is no proper FPS    Wow, this game is so bad even metacritic are removing negative reviews now.
    Let me just state, once again, before metacritic remove this review again also, that this game contains NO multiplayer of any significance at all, nothing. There is a co-op and a "invite your friends" type of rubbish multiplayer along with a stupid racing multiplayer (why?!??) but there is no proper FPS multiplayer, the game is complete and utter rubbish. Don't waste your money on it, even if it's on sale, it's not worth anything.
    Complete let down from ID, one of the last remaining PC developers sell out to the childish consoles generation.    … Expand
  15. shepard86
    Oct 15, 2011
    0
    this game looks and feels like **** on PC. it's awful. and i don't even refer to the rampant graphics glitching and bugs. id has really forgotten their roots in pc gaming. Rage is just a ghost of a decent pc game. the texture detail is a joke, everything looks like a pile of mud.
    headshots don't kill people (!!!). the id 5 engine may be capable of much more, but Rage sure as hell is not a    this game looks and feels like **** on PC. it's awful. and i don't even refer to the rampant graphics glitching and bugs. id has really forgotten their roots in pc gaming. Rage is just a ghost of a decent pc game. the texture detail is a joke, everything looks like a pile of mud.
    headshots don't kill people (!!!). the id 5 engine may be capable of much more, but Rage sure as hell is not a valid showcase for that.
    i just hope for ids' sake that they deliver what Rage should have been on the PC, and soon. otherwise they're pretty much dead to me.

    please take my advice and do not buy the game until all issues have been fixed. trust me, you will be disappointed and it will ruin the game for you.    … Expand
  16. jgoemat
    Oct 16, 2011
    3
    Good graphics, except when textures are popping in which happens ALL the time. It's so jarring I think I'd rather just have lower resolution textures. Are they just going for good screen shots for ads? Having the game crash every other quest is really annoying. The weapons and ammo choices are fun and the combat is fairly satisfying. When making the game so much about driving, I wishGood graphics, except when textures are popping in which happens ALL the time. It's so jarring I think I'd rather just have lower resolution textures. Are they just going for good screen shots for ads? Having the game crash every other quest is really annoying. The weapons and ammo choices are fun and the combat is fairly satisfying. When making the game so much about driving, I wish they had made driving more fun.… Expand
  17. Moses89
    Nov 11, 2011
    2
    Stopped playing after about 2 hours couldn't take the graphic problems anymore of course that was on day of launch so maybe its better by now? but I doubt it. Sloppy production, should have had a beta of the multiplayer car racing just to test even thing out and make sure it ran smooth but that would be smart and smart is not good business
  18. Picklock
    Nov 25, 2011
    4
    The amount of hype and excitement generated for this game created a fail of epic proportions when the product was finally released. The PC version is garbage, riddled with bugs, terrible porting causing shockingly low FPS and streaming textures at every direction. After some patches that should have already been implemented on release, the game runs fairly well. Even this doesn't make upThe amount of hype and excitement generated for this game created a fail of epic proportions when the product was finally released. The PC version is garbage, riddled with bugs, terrible porting causing shockingly low FPS and streaming textures at every direction. After some patches that should have already been implemented on release, the game runs fairly well. Even this doesn't make up for Rage's shortcomings that are suppose to make the game/engine a technological marvel described by some. There is no dynamic lighting and barely any physics(this world feels so static I could get an electric shock and die while playing). Games using the Unreal 3 engine have more polished and interesting features than this game. The animations on the enemies are swell and all, but has anyone looked at the animations for the friendly NPCs that hand out quests? Did they forget to animate the entire lower section of the rig? It feels like those old 70s robots you find at Disneyland that just move around the upper part of their body and the rest is stationary to hold them in place. LOOKS REDICULOUS FOR SOMETHING THAT TOOK 7 YEARS TO DEVELOP. The art is awesome, and that is the only reason this game gets a 4 from me. The rest barely holds up to current AAA standards. If this game was sold for 39.99 brand new, I would have a lot more forgiveness, but being released for a full 60 dollar price tag brings shame to id. This game is nothing new and I bet there is no way in hell that this fantastically crappy megatexture technology id developed will be used by anyone in the near future, it has proven to be an utter waste of time unless all you want is pretty screenshots to put in your portfolio.… Expand
  19. vincesz
    Jan 26, 2012
    3
    Uninteresting, unoriginal, and boring are the only descriptions I can give this game. I pre-ordered it and bought into John Carmack's craze and was left holding a steaming turd. The gun mechanics are tight, but there's really nothing here to really keep you playing. The gameplay is mediocre: it has tight gunplay that only the id software can deliver perfectly, but everything else fallsUninteresting, unoriginal, and boring are the only descriptions I can give this game. I pre-ordered it and bought into John Carmack's craze and was left holding a steaming turd. The gun mechanics are tight, but there's really nothing here to really keep you playing. The gameplay is mediocre: it has tight gunplay that only the id software can deliver perfectly, but everything else falls flat. Waves of the same old tired baddies, and the mechanics are out of the 90s. Running around corners shooting people is nice and all for nostalgia, but a game in 2011 needs to be more than a game in 1999 with 2009-level graphics.… Expand
  20. whitespider999
    Feb 17, 2012
    3
    Souless. While in broad strokes the game looks quite pleasing, rage feels like an upscaled mobile phone game. Sometimes making a game simple works, however it only works if you make it original or emotional or inventive. Rage does none of these things. No character has any personality although their asthetics suggest otherwise, the gunplay feels scripted, the enemy ai feels more like anSouless. While in broad strokes the game looks quite pleasing, rage feels like an upscaled mobile phone game. Sometimes making a game simple works, however it only works if you make it original or emotional or inventive. Rage does none of these things. No character has any personality although their asthetics suggest otherwise, the gunplay feels scripted, the enemy ai feels more like an animation routine than ai - The loot is a joke on us. There is no adventure in a world that yells, explore me! And even if you came in simply wanting a plain jane fps of the old days, it still fails to hold up. Shadow warrior, blood, quake 2, you name it, these older first person shooters are more 'involved' than this game. In fact, even duke nukem forever has more to it. The game also runs horribly on pc, uses 90% of 6 cpu's running at 5ghz (making the system requirements... let's see.. 5ghz is about twice that of xbox, so... 10 to 12 times more demanding) and still running into consistent microstutter. Significantly worse than duke nukem forever. And i REALLY hated that game.… Expand
  21. Gabbo
    Oct 16, 2011
    2
    good stuff, the graphics at a distance, racing is fun, enemies fun to fight, great story premise.
    Bad, lack of giving a damn for pc players, anticlimactic endings to every confrontation especially the ending, ill executed story line, and things seem to end way before they should.
    No graphics settings, except brightness. Many graphics problems due to this, I tried using the help forums but    good stuff, the graphics at a distance, racing is fun, enemies fun to fight, great story premise.
    Bad, lack of giving a damn for pc players, anticlimactic endings to every confrontation especially the ending, ill executed story line, and things seem to end way before they should.
    No graphics settings, except brightness. Many graphics problems due to this, I tried using the help forums but it made my save game un-usable so i just tried unsuccessfully to ignore the awful texture popping. This game seems big for awhile until you realize its all empty space except for the, say 3-5extra locations you can explore. tho the game seems to think its much bigger, it tells you to explore and find things, all you find are enemies and ammunition, so its a moot search. Worst ending to a game ive seen in a long time, incredibly un-satisfying, there isnt even a boss or challenging situation it just ENDS with a few waves of identical mild enemies. many of the quests you do seem pointless, especially in the last area. you complete some preliminary quests, which led me to believe there would be alot more, but then they just stop and you are told to go fight the final battle for reasons not clearly defined.    … Expand
  22. VergilAF
    Nov 11, 2011
    2
    Banal banal banal. A game that promised very well, had to be a cross between Doom and Fallout. Instead he found a game where our sole purpose is: accept the mission, carrying out missions, returns, accept the mission, carrying out missions, go back. Boring, repetitive and massive graphics problems. Bad game!
  23. theHommer
    Oct 17, 2011
    3
    If not for all the buggy graphics on PC this would have been a good game. Game is fun to play for me, but it lags the replay value. No really multiplayer is another big downfall to the game for me.
  24. thebuilder
    Oct 17, 2011
    2
    For something that has been done over and over since the 90s, it shouldn't be this hard to get it right.
    At least it shouldn't be this easy to get it so brutally wrong!
    Overall... Rage is the sad result of the modern game industry. Rushed, unpolished, overblown, unoriginal, and released with no responsibility or respect. Weapon control is terrible, it mostly feels like shooting BB ' at    For something that has been done over and over since the 90s, it shouldn't be this hard to get it right.
    At least it shouldn't be this easy to get it so brutally wrong!

    Overall... Rage is the sad result of the modern game industry. Rushed, unpolished, overblown, unoriginal, and released with no responsibility or respect. Weapon control is terrible, it mostly feels like shooting BB ' at the enemy... The environments are visually stunning, but the extreme level of linearity prevents you from wondering away from "invisible-wall" protected path, overall ruining what "could have been" an exciting experience.
    I cant say much about the story, its pretty insignificant. Limited/no character interaction in the story, no build ups, no smell of a plot twist in the air.. No smell of any plot at all tbh.
    Let it be known for the record that I have yet to finish the entire game, but at this point, im not sure that I want to...

    Conclusion:

    I would wait for Borderlands 2... I hardly think it will fail as bad.
    Don't buy Rage unless you are prepared to be patching, fixing and tweaking away all evening, only to be rewarded with a facepalm.
    I wouldn't say it's as bad as buying a bag of crap, but at least with the bag you don't have to get crap all over your hands.

    Builder out.    … Expand
  25. Okipoki
    Oct 22, 2011
    0
    $50 for a bunch of pure bugs. If it don't crash after the intro, you get a "desktop second chance" at the main screen. And when it run (after 1 or 2 hours), it's slow, buggy and unplayable.
    One thing i'm sure about this game: it's name is the best choice. That totally describe how i feel today !!
  26. Pierre
    Oct 29, 2011
    3
    Game for console. Game is made for short periods of light entertainment. Perfect for children under 12. For me it is like a variant of Super Mario Kart. I bought the game based on ID reputation, game trailers and reviews. It was a mistake.
  27. ShavedApe
    Nov 10, 2011
    3
    Graphically it doesnt look bad considering the system specs required and at first the game seemed like it had potential but then it just went downhill fast I quickly realized it was going to be the same thing over and over again. Drive to point from point A to point B kill a few bad guys in cars along the way cars, once at point B kill a few bad guys pick a up a few bits as part of yourGraphically it doesnt look bad considering the system specs required and at first the game seemed like it had potential but then it just went downhill fast I quickly realized it was going to be the same thing over and over again. Drive to point from point A to point B kill a few bad guys in cars along the way cars, once at point B kill a few bad guys pick a up a few bits as part of your quest then return to A killing a few more bad guys along the way in cars.

    The ability to upgrade cars or whatever yeah thats all well and good but the game holds no come back and play element to it I played 12 hours in total according to steam and some of that was to play the terrible multiplayer element.

    From a PC aspect they have now fixed most of the issues pc players had with patches but sadly patches dont fix a bad game.    … Expand
  28. Zane85
    Nov 14, 2011
    0
    Seriously hurt by the focus on XBOX 360 development, this game lacks the graphics par it should have been. And the story, plot of the game is terrible.

    But most of all it is full of bugs and they try to pass it off as been the fault of video card drivers, when they have been working with top people from AMD, yet huge amounts of issues are happening on AMD video cards still and on nVidia    Seriously hurt by the focus on XBOX 360 development, this game lacks the graphics par it should have been. And the story, plot of the game is terrible.

    But most of all it is full of bugs and they try to pass it off as been the fault of video card drivers, when they have been working with top people from AMD, yet huge amounts of issues are happening on AMD video cards still and on nVidia cards too. The Q&A is clearly not there along with the game, it was a design experiment not fully thought out, a mess mash of "the darkness" and "rage". Terrible, and not worth any ones time.    … Expand
  29. diogenesxxx
    Jan 10, 2012
    1
    Vehicle handling extremely poor, cannot finish even simplest required races, This makes the game virtually unplayable from Wellspring episode forward. Cannot recommend this game to anyone. Not to mention the Borderlands clone appearance. At least in Borderlands the mouse interface allows the vehicles to be drivable....
  30. Ophion
    Jan 27, 2012
    1
    Reviewer scores reek of payola -- just look at opinions from actual players of the game. I too made an account just to lambast this steaming pile. Graphics were pretty good for me, at least nothing to complain about. But the lack of story, the blatant plagiarism (basically the worst of Fallout 3 and Borderlands), the stunning anti-climax that was the end of the game... For yourReviewer scores reek of payola -- just look at opinions from actual players of the game. I too made an account just to lambast this steaming pile. Graphics were pretty good for me, at least nothing to complain about. But the lack of story, the blatant plagiarism (basically the worst of Fallout 3 and Borderlands), the stunning anti-climax that was the end of the game... For your hub-and-spoke mission system, there are *TWO* hubs, really closer to 1.5. Despite the vague whiff of an open world, the missions and story are entirely linear. The characters are caricatures. The driving is passable, but busywork (along with the occasional fetch quest). There are no choices, nor roleplaying. Quake was more fun, lived up to its potential and recognized its strengths. Rage is a buggy mess with nothing to recommend it.

    1 point instead of 0 for not being Duke Nukem Forever.    … Expand
  31. Binxalot
    Jan 15, 2012
    4
    The game should really be called "look but don't touch". RAGE is trying to do too many things and none of them well really, except for the graphics which are amazing, but the world you play in is dead, and not because of the story dead in that all of the maps are completely static, all of the objects are stuck to the floor, no physics or objects being scattered after an explosion orThe game should really be called "look but don't touch". RAGE is trying to do too many things and none of them well really, except for the graphics which are amazing, but the world you play in is dead, and not because of the story dead in that all of the maps are completely static, all of the objects are stuck to the floor, no physics or objects being scattered after an explosion or anything to move around, you can't even jump ontop of objects below your waist. The entire world is off limits so to speak. You can basically move and look at things like a simulation but there's no real reason to explore, you may find a few hidden items like playing cards for the mini game or pieces used to build stuff but they're randomly placed and it's just not fun and that goes in to the map designs as well:

    The maps are basically linear and you just go around shooting everythign until you loop back around to the end. There's very little variety in terms of enemy AI and placement, with the exception of the mutants but you can easily just walk over the invisible triggers in an area to make them jump out then run back in to a doorway to murder them all in a nice row, very not fun and annoying really.

    The rest of the enemies are not fun either, they take way too many bullets to kill and the mutant characters don't even leave any loot to find, they just absorb bullets and return nothing which forces you to do other things that aren't fun like racing and playing card games or delivering mail to make extra money so you can trudge through the next mission fighting the same types of things in the same way.

    To put rage in perspective HL2 came out in 2004 and offered the same type of post appo. world and did it right, the world while dead was completely alive, you broke things to open boxes, you solved puzzles to get around a map, enemies were varied and fun and the game has characters and story you give a **** about. As for the weapons, they're underpowered, all of them minus wing blade are worthless. the shotgun maybe not but it's only good close range and sometimes it doesn't kill the same two enemies with the same shot. Not sure whats the problem. Nothing is really that amazing you can change your ammo types but who cares, and you can hold up to 4 guns.

    The game has some RPG elements which translates to wasting your time back tracking and pressing the activate key twice to listen to an NPC babble on until you get to the mission accept screen. It's tedious, especially when dealing with vendors, each time you need to listen to the idiot vendor tell you he buys and sells items, then you need to wait for him to finish talking before you can buy said items every single time you visit a vendor. It's absolutely retarded. The game really isn't all that inspiring, I'm about 1/4 of the way through the game and I could give a flying **** whether or not I ever beat this, I may just watch the endnig on youtube and call it a day. I kinda owe it to my wife to finish this turd because she bought it for me for christmas. Oh well, nice try ID but this could have been a linear shooter and it would have been much better.    … Expand
  32. Jimbobbrown
    Jan 20, 2012
    2
    Have to say i've quite a tolerance for Id games (even liked Quake4) but i have to rate this one as bad. Got it bargain basement price to see what the new engine could do, its technically impressive. Didn't have any major issues running (odd crash and the textures load a little slow). Cant fault the art department. What lets it down is awful game play decisions by the developers - fromHave to say i've quite a tolerance for Id games (even liked Quake4) but i have to rate this one as bad. Got it bargain basement price to see what the new engine could do, its technically impressive. Didn't have any major issues running (odd crash and the textures load a little slow). Cant fault the art department. What lets it down is awful game play decisions by the developers - from story to shooting its all pretty uninteresting, story, boring missions in rail-like settings with poor A.I., enemies look and sound exactly the same - can't even loot guns - u have to wait till your given them? wtf? Guns on bodies just vaporize? I find it hard to believe that at some point nobody developing this game didn't say "hang on this is a little rough for a 2011 game". Very little RPG elements that I could tell, having put about two hours in, i've no desire to play any more (odd for an Id game). I was expecting a open - sandbox style game, its far from it. Don't buy. Ogle a few videos and kudos to the art team but avoid the game - there is nothing new, interesting or even well executed.… Expand
  33. Raddra
    Jan 15, 2012
    1
    I give it a 1 for some fairly decent looking landscapes, but that's all this game has going for it.

    I should have listened to the reviews.. believed the poor ratings, but I decided to get this game anyway when I had a strong nostalgia for something wasteland-ish and having already played all the other games out there. It was terrible.. that big red rating up there? that is accurate. In    I give it a 1 for some fairly decent looking landscapes, but that's all this game has going for it.

    I should have listened to the reviews.. believed the poor ratings, but I decided to get this game anyway when I had a strong nostalgia for something wasteland-ish and having already played all the other games out there.

    It was terrible.. that big red rating up there? that is accurate. In fact its worse.. that 4.4 has been padded by fanboys and what I believe to be company employee's rating 10.

    Textures take time to load when you turn around. The plot is so insanely contrived its abysmal. The starting sequence is 'get out of pod, get attacked by previously invisible enemies, guy pulls you on a car after psychically knowing you were there and drives you home, doesn't offer you a drink or a rest.. puts a gun in your hand and says 'go kill' its insane and I think 10 year olds could write a more believable start to this game. After getting cut-scened to progress the plot (I despise cuts-cene defeats with the passion of a thousand suns) I just gave up.. its poorly wrote, buggy, has a counter intuitive UI and leaves you utterly frustrated at every turn.    … Expand
  34. Horus
    Oct 18, 2011
    0
    This game is ****
    **** graphics, **** sounds (when you actually hear something), **** scenario, and **** shooting (like firing with nerf guns, no punch, all soft).
    DONT EVER THINK BUYING THIS
  35. SrMoure
    Nov 7, 2011
    4
    It is just Borderlnad clone. Graphics are really good. But IMO Borderland was a great game and this one fails. Unfortunately, this game is linear and boring.
  36. ChoO-T
    Nov 10, 2011
    2
    An horrible PC port, buggy, boring and too easy. I'v waited for chanlenge and fun... theyre never come. And seriously, what the **** with the texel ratio ?
  37. BradleyBondage
    Dec 23, 2011
    0
    stupidly buggy it feels like a straight up port, the game is barely playable as theres a severe graphics problem I get when i play this game causing all sorts of textures from guns and other stupid things to replace the environment they really need to patch this game! from what i have played it feels really linear and i do feel cheated out of my £30
  38. mcdonis
    Jan 12, 2012
    2
    Just finished the game tonight on PC. Rage has some good qualties that help it, it has a good combat system and interesting guns. It also at times look good (at a distance) and can be fun expecially in the first couple of hours. However Rage is only a AAA game for the first 20 minutes very shortly after that its all downhill. The story is about as non-existent as I have ever seen inJust finished the game tonight on PC. Rage has some good qualties that help it, it has a good combat system and interesting guns. It also at times look good (at a distance) and can be fun expecially in the first couple of hours. However Rage is only a AAA game for the first 20 minutes very shortly after that its all downhill. The story is about as non-existent as I have ever seen in a game billed as an open world RPG. There are arcade shooters out there that spent more time working on dialog and story than Rage. Textures at short rage are terrible (I was using NVIDIA not ATI) so much so that is unforgiveable in a "AAA" title. Gameplay is extremly lame for a something billed as an RPG, there are no real choices you make in the game. Every map is a one way path with no choices or even abilities to get lost, ever! The ending is the lamest I have ever seen from a major developer. No boss, no story, not even a real challenge. Just a few enemies that wouldnt be out of place in any of the other maps. Kill them and then poof game over.… Expand
  39. Moononu
    Mar 2, 2012
    0
    Appalling experience, huge disappointment. 2 evenings of trying to get the game working on my laptop. Downloading drivers, game crashing and now I have GL error and can't even start it. Be warned - you will despise yourself if you buy this - the game couldn't have been properly tested as it is just about unplayable on pc.
  40. edjiang
    Jul 16, 2012
    0
    This game is terrible. It feels like id ran out of budget in the middle of making the game and decided to cut it off. To top it off, the gameplay was boring and repetitive, none of the characters were remotely interesting, and the guns are ridiculously underpowered. The most powerful weapon in the game is a boomerang, which one-shots almost everything except bosses. The game is alsoThis game is terrible. It feels like id ran out of budget in the middle of making the game and decided to cut it off. To top it off, the gameplay was boring and repetitive, none of the characters were remotely interesting, and the guns are ridiculously underpowered. The most powerful weapon in the game is a boomerang, which one-shots almost everything except bosses. The game is also riddled with bugs and game-breaking glitches.… Expand
  41. MysticalChicken
    Jul 24, 2012
    0
    Very disappointing, just another **** generic shooter poorly ported to the PC. Combat is repetitive and boring, story is uninteresting and **** and definitely would not recommend to anyone.
  42. tronchaviones
    Mar 14, 2015
    1
    id Software has lost all the talent. Now they cannot implement properly any driving dynamics, cannot process a headshot and cannot understand why nobody buys their **** software.

    RAGE is just a bad copy of Fallout, rushed to market without any polish.

    Boring, boring, boring, boring, boring, boring, boring, boring, boring, boring, boring and repetitive.
  43. El_Guap0
    Feb 13, 2013
    1
    Feels utterly rushed with half finished assets all over. Bullet sponge enemies, lots and lots of invisible walls and a predictable and starved storyline.
    They don't have enough levels to be a AAA game, so they make you play the same levels TWICE and re-skin the same enemies.
    Seems like it could have used a year or two in development to flesh out the quests and ditch bad stuff. I will    Feels utterly rushed with half finished assets all over. Bullet sponge enemies, lots and lots of invisible walls and a predictable and starved storyline.
    They don't have enough levels to be a AAA game, so they make you play the same levels TWICE and re-skin the same enemies.
    Seems like it could have used a year or two in development to flesh out the quests and ditch bad stuff.
    I will never listen to bought reviewers again.    … Expand
  44. Oxcart
    Mar 12, 2013
    4
    Rage is one of this games that could have, should have, been really great. One of those games that not only game with a lot of promise, but started in such a way that you think, "this is gonna be awesome!"...inky to smash those hopes on the rocks a few too many times. The premise: Earth was clobbered by the Apophis asteroid (real rock, look it up for more info). Select survivors (includingRage is one of this games that could have, should have, been really great. One of those games that not only game with a lot of promise, but started in such a way that you think, "this is gonna be awesome!"...inky to smash those hopes on the rocks a few too many times. The premise: Earth was clobbered by the Apophis asteroid (real rock, look it up for more info). Select survivors (including you) were buried in stasis in subterranean "arks," while the majority were left to enjoy a huge asteroid whacking the planet from the front-row seats. Nevertheless, there were survivors on the surface amid the destruction, and this is the world into which you emerge: blasted rubble, hardscrabble existence, and no shortage of conflict. So, great premise. Graphics are unbelievable, particularly the environments, vehicles, and especially the first-person weapon renders. Audio is great (SFX are top-notch). Writing is good (enough), voice acting very good. The crafting system for creating ammunition, tools, and weapons was clever and, amazingly, not tedious. So what went wrong? Well, in a word: id. Yeah, the old warhorse of FPS gaming, id Software (remember Doom? Them.) totally wrecked an otherwise grand game. Short story is that Rage suffers from ego poisoning. It's impossible to play for more than a few minutes before you run into another self-serving self-refence to another id game, be it Doom, Wolfenstein, or whatever. Look, I have no problem with easter-egg appearances. When I saw the space marine bobblehead on a dashboard within the first five minutes of gameplay, I thought "cool dev nod, nice." But after dozens of references, half of which were absolutely ridiculous, I spent more time rolling my eyes and getting mad at id than I did enjoying the game. (Seriously, there was a Doom hell prince as the texture for a COFFEE POT. Someone deserved to be slapped for that.) id's ego was out of control and disproportionally so; Bethesda Softworks snuck in one easter egg, a vaultboy bobblehead from Fallout, which was cool because it actually appeared in the original game, unlike the Doom hell prince which I don't think ever took up residence in small kitchen appliances. That aside, the game felt unfinished. Missions were clever and varied until the end, whereuoon the game took on an attitude of "we ran out of ideas, so here's some leftover 1990's style monster box gameplay and then we're gonna roll credits." Devs, take note, because this is what really screwed up Fallout 2: too many pop culture references. Game worlds, like film, are about suspension of disbelief. Keep bombarding the audiene with references and you blow that. Lose it and the experience suffers and the faults become far apparent. It's worth noting that I bought this game on the faith and belief in Bethesda's commitment to quality; by my experience, they'd never made a dud, and I had no reason to think they were going to start. One $60 mistake later and that trust was vapor. Six out of ten is very generous for this ego hodgepodge blended unevenly with an actual game...too generous. Make it five.… Expand
  45. lucidanarchy
    May 23, 2012
    4
    I really enjoyed this game up until the end, where it just ended without any ability to continue playing the game. Not sure what was the point of upgrading vehicles, weapons and talk of how dangerous the authority is, when it was quite the opposite and saw really none of them. The ending of the game really made the journey through the entire game pointless.
  46. a_big_favor
    Apr 23, 2013
    3
    Strictly talking gameplay wise, this game is a turd.
    This is a shooter, that has an "overworld" where you get quests and you have to drive to missions on a buggy. You know the mission area begins because you have to get off your buggy.
    Picking up items is tedius, shooting people is tedious, making things adds an extra step incase you werent bored enough, the maps are rehashed very early    Strictly talking gameplay wise, this game is a turd.
    This is a shooter, that has an "overworld" where you get quests and you have to drive to missions on a buggy. You know the mission area begins because you have to get off your buggy.
    Picking up items is tedius, shooting people is tedious, making things adds an extra step incase you werent bored enough, the maps are rehashed very early on, and you play a minigame instead of dying...
    The most fun I had was when I first killed an enemy because he jumped to the side and hopped on the cieling, and i realized there was not aquick meele button. The suck set in and now the only thing entertaining is crashing your buggy and flinging yourself into the mission.
    The story is not engaging. There aren;t many "transition" animations where you get in a vehicle or grab a zipline, the screen just goes black sometimes, and that is really lazy. And for some reason when you shoot people in a town, blood gushes but nothing happens..
    Lots of other problems but these jump out at me as actively deciding to not make a good game. I don't know why critics reviewed this so positively.    … Expand
  47. Eklypze
    Mar 18, 2013
    0
    Made an account just to say I've never played this game. Which is funny cause I own it. Pretty sure Bethesda should have been sued for this pile of crap. I was never able to get passed the sequence after the really amazing looking intro.
  48. Heavymetal4life
    Oct 7, 2011
    0
    I would Like to retract my previous review of this game in Lack of a comment by the DEV Carmack, Stating basically why they did this to PC gamers is cause Consoles lead the Gaming industry. Well cause of this an the numerous launch issues for PC, I have requested Steam to refund my purchase that is how sour a taste ID software has left in my mouth, I feel sorry for Bethesda getting stuckI would Like to retract my previous review of this game in Lack of a comment by the DEV Carmack, Stating basically why they did this to PC gamers is cause Consoles lead the Gaming industry. Well cause of this an the numerous launch issues for PC, I have requested Steam to refund my purchase that is how sour a taste ID software has left in my mouth, I feel sorry for Bethesda getting stuck in this Flack as well. The game has a horrible if what story line. The quests are more linear then I want to deal with, and are completely Dull. the Multiple Render issues for PC graphics are one of the biggest issues I see, an the lack of any true control to customize the graphics makes it even worse. I wish I could delete my old review, please disagree with it as much as you can so it is removed from this games metascore. An all the critics who gave this game a 7+ are complete sell outs an do not know how to review a game, Like I now feel about my first review, I wanted to like the game I really did but plain an simple it is TRASH. Not even worth $60 dollars at most I would pay $30 for this heap of issues Garbage title I should of trusted my instincts when I first saw the game come out an said wow this game looks like a Conport Trash pos. I have not felt so much hate and anger towards a company now as I do with them, Like EA has ruined lots of good titles as well. They made this game for Consoles an slapped some shabby code together to launch of PC too for extra money in their greedy scheme. An still have not patched the list of issues the game is having an most likely will always have since the code was written for Consoles.… Expand
  49. elijman
    Oct 9, 2011
    0
    Everything is the black squares! I wasted all weekend on this ** tried everything but no patch, no driver helped!
    This game is a greatest fail of this year I am not going 2 buy Skyrim because Bethesda screwed up; pirates are so lucky they didn't play for none working game!
  50. AfricanWoolf
    Oct 15, 2011
    1
    With none of the style, humour or interesting weaponry of Borderlands and none of the massive world, character development and awesome of Fallout 3; RAGE is a poorly put together game made a company that has lagged behind the industry in almost every area.

    Almost unplayable on a PC that can handle anything releasing this year at max specs. RAGE does nothing new with the aesthetic and    With none of the style, humour or interesting weaponry of Borderlands and none of the massive world, character development and awesome of Fallout 3; RAGE is a poorly put together game made a company that has lagged behind the industry in almost every area.

    Almost unplayable on a PC that can handle anything releasing this year at max specs. RAGE does nothing new with the aesthetic and doesn't even have a unique, well fleshed out world to compensate for the solid but boring gunplay.

    Very disappointing.    … Expand
  51. Rough
    Oct 14, 2011
    0
    I can't comment on the game play because I couldn't get the game to run. My system would either crash or it would have huge visual artifacts, the game would stutter, the npc's would blink in and out of existence and the texture pop-ins were horrible. I have a high end system running dual HD6850's, hexa-core cpu and a SSD HD. This is the only game that I've purchased in the last yearI can't comment on the game play because I couldn't get the game to run. My system would either crash or it would have huge visual artifacts, the game would stutter, the npc's would blink in and out of existence and the texture pop-ins were horrible. I have a high end system running dual HD6850's, hexa-core cpu and a SSD HD. This is the only game that I've purchased in the last year that wouldn't play. It has been 2 weeks since launch (I pre-ordered) and there is still no fix. The developer forums are saying to modify .cfg files manually in order to make it "not crash". This is crazy that two big name developers put out this pile of stink. I hear that the console versions run great but don't buy this for PC.… Expand
  52. oye
    Oct 17, 2011
    0
    I actually created an account here at metacritic to share my review of this game because i was soo disappointed. ID used to be a legendary company, but this game is a horrible console port, a dated linear and boring game that seems like it's stuck in the past. Don't waste your money on this game, you'll only regret it.
  53. Vadinoi
    Oct 21, 2011
    3
    PC the game version the awful, bad drawing, a weak plot of game. Passage of game to the same locations as to founders laziness was to do game. The game end simply failure.
  54. stri9ker
    Nov 14, 2011
    0
    Why are we getting TAT like this for gaming P.C's .Total let down , boring corridor fps action ,no free for all multi player online action, I couldnt be bothered playing after about 1hr of play so i seen the ending at my friends ,all i can say is glad i stopped playing .
    NEED something new get my teeth into , this couldnt feed a sparrow .
  55. Khildram
    Nov 13, 2011
    2
    Huge deception on this game. ~10h of gameplay so far.

    The positive points : - Length. It's so bad that a few hours of playing seems ages doing always the same. - Weapons. A few weapons are great fun, but it's not like you can use them often. The negative points : - Graphics. I don't have the very latest hardware available but it's still far above any console. Seriously low resolution    Huge deception on this game. ~10h of gameplay so far.

    The positive points :
    - Length. It's so bad that a few hours of playing seems ages doing always the same.
    - Weapons. A few weapons are great fun, but it's not like you can use them often.

    The negative points :
    - Graphics. I don't have the very latest hardware available but it's still far above any console. Seriously low resolution textures everywhere when all is maxed out in options... ?
    - Lack of interesting things to do. It's all linear dungeon crawling. And you have to do each level twice, once normal and once in reverse. That's an artifact to cover the lack of content.
    The Hub towns are trying to make you forget that you get all missions in a linear fashion. But it's not helping much really...
    Racing cars has no interest and is dull, it's even too basic to be interesting in MP.
    - Gameplay. The same dated gameplay as in the old Doom, i.e. you fire all that you have at the opponent. No matter where you fire (head, legs...), a type of enemy has a certain amount of HP and you keep firing until you reduce these to zero, i.e. localisation of the hit will only change an animation, but not make more damage. Forget headshots. The only thing that changes how fast you kill an opponent is the type of ammo/damage that your weapon does.
    - Difficulty. Just based on how much opponent they send at you and how much you conserve ammo.
    - Art Direction / Concept Art. They really need to hire design artists that really can bring some concept art and some interesting scenario. Here it looks like a patchwork of ideas taken here and there, put together without any coherence in between.

    In the end the only outstanding mission is the Dead City mission that we've all seen in the gamepkay trailers.
    The rest is dull, it has no taste.
    I don't even think I want to finish it...    … Expand
  56. Anarchy
    Oct 12, 2011
    0
    Rage is certainly the emotion I expressed in response to this "game". The cataclysmically poor release of Rage if anything, symbolises of John Carmack flushing his job and legacy down the toilet. Rage gives the impression of a game larger than it really is, while failing to meet even the lowest of expectations and even sinking below the realms of mediocrity into the stinking depths ofRage is certainly the emotion I expressed in response to this "game". The cataclysmically poor release of Rage if anything, symbolises of John Carmack flushing his job and legacy down the toilet. Rage gives the impression of a game larger than it really is, while failing to meet even the lowest of expectations and even sinking below the realms of mediocrity into the stinking depths of absolute crap. The Arc? Resistance? Foes called the Security? Oh sorry, Authority? The threadbare story that actually does exist in this game is simply pilfered from Brink, a substandard game in its own right. Slap together all the WORST bits of Borderlands and you have Rage. Combat consists of mind-numbing corridor shooting, padded out by twice as much running/driving to and from objectives. That's it. From the start, I wasn't even able to play it. For some asinine reason, Carmack thought it'd be a great idea to develop software for console systems that were already obsolete rather than the PC which is used itself to actually CODE the game, and so constantly at the fore. So thanks to id SoftwareÃ¢â… Expand
  57. florianwyler
    Feb 29, 2012
    1
    This game is really bad. The story has a very disappointing ending, the quests and gameplay are repetitive and boring. All in all, not worth the price.
  58. Trytobefair
    Oct 19, 2011
    3
    The Level design is outstanding, the vast size of the maps made me initially happy, BUT, the KI is not very bright and the storyline runs below zero. All enemies looked nicely different, but had the same way of stumbling around. The car races during the game were to me the most funny bit and I really loved it. I don't understand your technical issues, the game worked absolutely fine for meThe Level design is outstanding, the vast size of the maps made me initially happy, BUT, the KI is not very bright and the storyline runs below zero. All enemies looked nicely different, but had the same way of stumbling around. The car races during the game were to me the most funny bit and I really loved it. I don't understand your technical issues, the game worked absolutely fine for me on my SLI. They made a outstanding graphical level design action game with a birdbrained KI it's as simple as that.… Expand
  59. TOBestar
    Oct 16, 2011
    0
    Installed the game and textures were corrupted. Installed recommended driver for my hd6850 and the newest patch, but that didn't change anything.
    Furthermore there's no support from Id or Bethesda, so you have to read the official forums to get help from other players.
    I have struggled for over a week to get this game working, but it either gives me graphical errors or just random crashes.    Installed the game and textures were corrupted. Installed recommended driver for my hd6850 and the newest patch, but that didn't change anything.
    Furthermore there's no support from Id or Bethesda, so you have to read the official forums to get help from other players.
    I have struggled for over a week to get this game working, but it either gives me graphical errors or just random crashes. Tryed several drivers, driver settings, config settings and start parameters, but nothing's working for me. This is just ridiculous for a game that took 5 years in development.
    I got a Q6600, 4Gb PC2-6400 dual channel ram and a 6850, so I'm in the speccs.

    Don't bother spending your money on this game since you won't be able to play it.
    Sadly a bought it via steam so I can't get my money back.
    End of story.    … Expand
  60. Kimomarudotcom
    Jul 24, 2012
    1
    A low point in Id's existence. On a technical level, the horribly distracting texture problem can be somewhat forgiven as the engine's ambition was perhaps far greater than the average system can handle today. Fine. What's not forgivable is the horrible design. This is no example of "old school" gameplay, this just plain sucks, it's boring, and there's no payoff. If you see it onA low point in Id's existence. On a technical level, the horribly distracting texture problem can be somewhat forgiven as the engine's ambition was perhaps far greater than the average system can handle today. Fine. What's not forgivable is the horrible design. This is no example of "old school" gameplay, this just plain sucks, it's boring, and there's no payoff. If you see it on Steam for 10 bucks, go find another game. Id should be PAYING people to play this, not the other way around. It even fails as a tech demo since the engine won't be licensed out. So, then, what's the point of making this game?… Expand
  61. Lobby007
    Jan 3, 2012
    1
    If you really like game like Borderlands, this game may be for you, but is well below it. If you are a fan of Mario Kart, you may be pleased with this game, but it's, of course, less funny. But so far, I know NO ONE that likes both games. And this is what Carmack has done, a sorrowful mixture of both games. And even worse. HE HAS DESTROYED ID BRAND. I will never forgive him. And finally,If you really like game like Borderlands, this game may be for you, but is well below it. If you are a fan of Mario Kart, you may be pleased with this game, but it's, of course, less funny. But so far, I know NO ONE that likes both games. And this is what Carmack has done, a sorrowful mixture of both games. And even worse. HE HAS DESTROYED ID BRAND. I will never forgive him. And finally, in addition to design, the technical issue has been full of bugs. Damn them!!!… Expand
  62. Orlynao1131
    Oct 15, 2011
    2
    iD thinks this is better than Doom 3? iD REALLY thinks this is **** better than Doom 3? Dear God iD. I thought you would be better than this... but you saying that THIS IS BETTER THAN DOOM 3? I hope you recover FAST from this TERRIBLE game.
  63. smokeyninjas
    Oct 21, 2011
    0
    17 days since release & still an unplayable buggy mess, clearly only the minimum amount attention & testing was given to PC version leaving a horrible broken game total ripoff
  64. jetSetWilly
    Oct 26, 2011
    0
    Out of date controls, no serious customization for the user exists in this game. You must do this, do it that way! There are plenty of pretty games these days, it doesn't cut it as a game anymore just to be pushing the envelope in graphics. The people have spoken! This game suxors.
  65. Serious_Gamer
    Dec 3, 2011
    3
    I don't even know what to say about this game to be honest, being a serious gamer, I expected big things from a game which had Bethesda involved in it even if it didn't create it. Well what is there to say? Other than it sucks big time, if you want buggy AI, an average storyline, bad controls and boring game play then by all means get this game. For people who want a serious gamer's viewI don't even know what to say about this game to be honest, being a serious gamer, I expected big things from a game which had Bethesda involved in it even if it didn't create it. Well what is there to say? Other than it sucks big time, if you want buggy AI, an average storyline, bad controls and boring game play then by all means get this game. For people who want a serious gamer's view on it - don't get it because it's a piece of s***!… Expand
  66. jpinks
    Dec 29, 2011
    4
    It was too short!!! The game once textures were fixed was ok. It just wasnt how they represented the game to be. I expected a game about Fallout 3 in length. This game was done in a day. Very repetitive and so totally on rails that there was no choices really to be made. Its pretty but this did feel more like a tech demo of see how pretty we can make a world.
  67. Goden
    Feb 6, 2012
    1
    I'm going to flatout admit and say that I only played the game for an hour before writing this. I would have loved to continue playing but my head started to throb and my eyes are sore because this game delivers one of the worst visual experiences money can currently buy for the PC. First thing I noticed right out of the box was this game has THE worst screen-tearing I've ever seen in anyI'm going to flatout admit and say that I only played the game for an hour before writing this. I would have loved to continue playing but my head started to throb and my eyes are sore because this game delivers one of the worst visual experiences money can currently buy for the PC. First thing I noticed right out of the box was this game has THE worst screen-tearing I've ever seen in any game I've played. Tears pop up so frequently and are so big that they take a decent chunk of our screen. Next is the infamous texture pop-in which means textures don't load until you look at them. You don't need to have tech understanding to see how this sounds really stupid. What this means is that textures visually load when you look at them, so every time you go around a corner or move around everything is all blurry. Even when textures do load properly they still look low-res and everything is so under-saturated the game might as well be black and white. Add this to the fact that on release this game had NO graphics options of any description so all of the above was not fixable. This is by far the worst game I've played in a long time and one of the worst console ports I've ever seen.… Expand
  68. dimon222
    Nov 8, 2011
    1
    Baddest optimisation ever. I didnt got it to work on my i7 930, Corsair C4 2x2GB, HIS Radeon HD6950.
    I was trying update drivers, change config files, use patches. No way for start campaign.
    Carmack fully change my minds about ID Software. This fail means more then Doom 3 previously.
  69. MasterT
    Nov 8, 2011
    3
    Never been so mad to have paid full price a game that is less than 15 hours long. Although the graphics are nice I can't believe it was released with so many bugs. I spent more time playing sonic generations than this game and sonic was half price. The multiplayer was an even bigger joke. They should've integrated a real multiplayer coop and a deathmatch mode. I don't want a damn drivingNever been so mad to have paid full price a game that is less than 15 hours long. Although the graphics are nice I can't believe it was released with so many bugs. I spent more time playing sonic generations than this game and sonic was half price. The multiplayer was an even bigger joke. They should've integrated a real multiplayer coop and a deathmatch mode. I don't want a damn driving game in a fps what is wrong with you?!… Expand
  70. Speedhorn
    Nov 16, 2011
    2
    I like to think of myself as a moderate reviewer, but this game has angered me so much. It's probably my own fault, I expected more. I have a fairly powerful machine, yet this game chugged something awful pre patching. Still full of graphical bugs in my experience. I guess I was also disappointed by how short the game was and how UNimmersive it was. Just get Fallout 3 or New Vegas. NotI like to think of myself as a moderate reviewer, but this game has angered me so much. It's probably my own fault, I expected more. I have a fairly powerful machine, yet this game chugged something awful pre patching. Still full of graphical bugs in my experience. I guess I was also disappointed by how short the game was and how UNimmersive it was. Just get Fallout 3 or New Vegas. Not much to be missed here.… Expand
  71. ACS
    Nov 27, 2011
    0
    Maybe it's a good game. But I'll never know, because it runs UNPLAYABLY badly on the PC port. I am hardly alone if you read the other user reviews. Consider yourself warned.
  72. notacarebear
    Dec 18, 2011
    0
    This game is just a tech demo of id's game engine, there are quests, an underlying fps matrix, vehicle riding, but what's missing entirely is the gameplay and my will to continue playing the game after 4 hours of utter boredom. I feel sorry for id's artists right now because they did a great job.
  73. quood
    Feb 14, 2012
    1
    Mac version... I DLed this from the App Store (£27) having heard it's similar to Borderlands. OMG what a mistake. Filled with technical glitches, which meant it took 2hrs to even get playing. Driver support for controllers is a nightmare; I lost count of the number of times I went through various processes, restarted my iMac, etc, etc, before finally getting the blasted thingMac version... I DLed this from the App Store (£27) having heard it's similar to Borderlands. OMG what a mistake. Filled with technical glitches, which meant it took 2hrs to even get playing. Driver support for controllers is a nightmare; I lost count of the number of times I went through various processes, restarted my iMac, etc, etc, before finally getting the blasted thing to work. The game itself is filled with dire, dull, excruciatingly bland cut-scenes which cannot be skipped. Replete with characters it's tremendously hard to give a monkey's about, and who spiel out the most unutterably bland dialogue. "I'm a mechanic. You can fix your car here. Press Y to have me fix your car. You can also call me by radio..." Bluergh. I've taken to checking my emails / cutting away from Rage whilst the dull-as-ditchwater cutscenes play out. Gameplay is uninspiring. The RPG / upgradeable element is almost non-existent. 'Choose one of four armour suits, which'll give you a static benefit throughout the game.' Great. Firing weapons is remarkably tedious: all weapons have 100% predictable stats (unlike Borderlands), with crosshairs that *do not waver one inch*, even in hyper-zoomed sniper rifle mode. There's no element of chance, either; every weapon (even the pistol) hits 100% if your entirely stable crosshairs are 100% on the target. Bleurgh. Silent weapons - afaict, and having completed the single campaign - are utterly pointless, bringing no benefits whatsoever. Even the potentially interesting weapons - like mind control bolts - turn out to be futile 95% of the time, and only marginally less useful than usual bullets the other 5%. AI is dull. Everyone behaves the same. Everyone seeks exactly the same cover points: keep throwing grenades until everything's obliterated. Things only get remotely interesting in the later levels, with LARGE hordes of melee fighters. Penultimately, the racing rapidly switches between ridiculously easy and a matter of raw luck; the 'driving' aspect of the game only brings 4 cars with it, each of which have a very finite number of worthwhile upgrades. Finally, the campaign is chuffing tiny. Like, 11hrs and 20 minutes in - and I thought I was taking things slowly - I've finished a 'normal' campaign. Replay value feels minimal, though I'm trying to gather the inspiration to have a go at 'hard' or 'nightmare.' Compare that with Borderlands - the best part of a year on, I've got 2 characters running the various campaigns, with well over 60hrs of gameplay between them. I was kinda stunned when I realised I'd finished Rage, in a very much 'is that ACTUALLY it?!' kinda way. On any replays, I'll look for a bit more in the way of side missions / exploring... but I get the feeling there isn't much there. All in all, vapid, dull, characterless, bland. Beautiful scenery. But - good grief - I really can't understand why anyone would choose this over Borderlands. Or even Bioshock (or Bioshock 2, soon to be released). Particularly on a Mac, at the moment, Rage is nowhere near worth it.… Expand
  74. nico9julio
    Apr 2, 2012
    2
    I was expecting a story. Everything is scripted so obvious. Really boring. Disappointing. The IA is so dumb...
    Every mission is essentialy the same over and over again.
  75. Rezear
    Nov 23, 2012
    0
    Unplayable with a Ati Radeon HD 6790 graphics card, you have to downgrade to driver version 11.8 to be able to play. This game is more trouble than it's worth.
  76. stg
    Jun 6, 2012
    4
    Nice looking, but a bit slow in action and way too buggy. It is amazing that this game was released as it was - with major problems on very common video cards - but it is even worse that several months after the release major problems exist.
  77. kriskizlyk
    May 1, 2012
    2
    Oh my lord....this game was so bad. I kept playing to actually see if the game would get...same effect as Crysis...nope...greatly disappointing. The ending...wow...I will give it a solid 2 because the graphics had their moments. Whoever bought the collectors edition, I feel sorry for you.
  78. trek554
    Apr 20, 2012
    2
    an ok game to play but horrible low res graphics break the immersion. at first I thought I could look past the graphics but the more I play, the more they bother me.
  79. Tarrak
    Aug 3, 2012
    3
    Simply unsatisfying. It had potential and it had hype. Neither were anywhere near fulfilled. Admittedly it does have those little things that make you believe when you hear about it, but when you see that it isn't all that developed you get doubly let down.
    You can easily have fun with the game, but the entire multiplatform business ruined what could have been a real gem.
  80. jtgunner
    Aug 3, 2012
    4
    i dont undersatnd what went wrong .but it has.terrible textures even on pc.i have a high end pc i built and not my 1st build.the idea is amazing the world setting is awsome ,but the bugs,omg the bugs.horrendous texture draw.i cant believe this made it out to the public total failure.i want my money back Carmack
  81. CainGaming
    Sep 24, 2012
    4
    I was eagerly anticipating this game, because it looked like something of a cross between Borderlands, and something else I can't quite remember now. I pre-ordered it on steam, and when it finally came out I was so hyped, I couldn't get home quick enough to start playing.
    Except I couldn't.
    Because the launch was so bug-filled it took several days to work out the problems with my ATI    I was eagerly anticipating this game, because it looked like something of a cross between Borderlands, and something else I can't quite remember now. I pre-ordered it on steam, and when it finally came out I was so hyped, I couldn't get home quick enough to start playing.
    Except I couldn't.
    Because the launch was so bug-filled it took several days to work out the problems with my ATI card, which at the time (HD 6970) was one of the best ATIs on the market. But alas, the problems plagued it.
    When I finally managed to get onto the game, again, the textures kept popping, screen tearing even with VSync on, etc. It was terrible.
    I think I left the game for a while, waited for a big patch or two, then came back to it eagerly. The first two-three hours of gameplay were quite enjoyable, but quickly I began to tire. The same repetitive scenes with repetitive enemies were boring, I expected a more open-world sort of thing, like Borderlands, instead of the enclosed canyon walls. If there is more than that, I didn't get up to that because I never finished the game.
    The weapons were another thing that annoyed me. Although I did love the wingstick, and the grenades/throwing items in general were cool, the shooting element was terrible. The assault rifle was terrible. It took damn near two magazines to kill someone! Although it /may/ have been some bad marksmanship on my part, it still took ages to kill people. The driving was a decent element, the races were pretty fun half the time, I guess. The crafting element was interesting too.

    But overall, it could have been a much better game. The gameplay was repetitive and got boring very quickly, plagued by graphics problems, and even now I think my card struggles slightly due to bad optimization. The only thing that prevents me from rating this a solid 0 is the fact it's a decent attempt, some parts of the game are fun, although the story had me completely lost very quickly. Although the post-apocalyptic genre/theme has a lot of scope and if pulled off correctly, could become a fantastic game comparable to legends like Fallout, and Borderlands, but RAGE doesn't come close.
    I expected much more, iD.    … Expand
  82. JerryYeh
    Oct 7, 2012
    0
    First things first, the graphic is ugly.

    Yes, my pc's specification is way above recommended spec , and the graphic still looks like it should came out 3 years ago. Especially for a graphic designer who knows 3d software myself, the texture is so heavily compressed, you can see the artifact which in Photoshop term "Over-Sharpened". Any other open world game came out 1~2 years ago can    First things first, the graphic is ugly.

    Yes, my pc's specification is way above recommended spec , and the graphic still looks like it should came out 3 years ago. Especially for a graphic designer who knows 3d software myself, the texture is so heavily compressed, you can see the artifact which in Photoshop term "Over-Sharpened". Any other open world game came out 1~2 years ago can beat Rage's graphic, this is nothing but disappointing to see id failed on the PC like this, which was supposed to be their primary platform.

    And the story is just plain and uninspired, I have no urge to keep playing after the first few missions, the world is dull, the characters are dull, and everything looks very dull. There's nothing driving me forward. Unlike Fallout 3 or Fallout: New Vegas, both sucked me in for weeks, even months, not even counting the DLCs by the way.

    In the end, I just don't see any reason you would want to play this game, I don't see any merits in this game. Mind you this is very rare for me, I usually do find some small things that's worth noting in some very bad games, but in this case, Rage simply have nothing for me to recommend to others, so sorry to say this, but don't buy this game. Play Fallout or Elder Scroll series, that's the kind of open world game you would want to play.    … Expand
  83. ss4real
    Oct 8, 2011
    0
    Do not buy. Completely over-hyped, boring corridor shooter. Not terrible looking but clearly a console port. Did I mention it's boring? It's a game that focuses on the shooting aspect too much yet completely missed the mark when it comes to how the shooting is done. Head shots do nothing, the AI is retarded, same missions over & over. When was the last time ID made a good game....oh yeahDo not buy. Completely over-hyped, boring corridor shooter. Not terrible looking but clearly a console port. Did I mention it's boring? It's a game that focuses on the shooting aspect too much yet completely missed the mark when it comes to how the shooting is done. Head shots do nothing, the AI is retarded, same missions over & over. When was the last time ID made a good game....oh yeah Doom. Skip this please.… Expand
  84. oivalfselat
    Nov 17, 2011
    1
    When I bought Doom 3, I liked the darkness of the scenarios, because at the time, normal map and real time stencil shadows were interesting to look. But the gameplay, storyline and multiplayer... so I bought in the end, 50% of the final product, considering these, the system of light and textures. The game is disposable.
    For a long time, I was surprised with RAGE, his images show a game    When I bought Doom 3, I liked the darkness of the scenarios, because at the time, normal map and real time stencil shadows were interesting to look. But the gameplay, storyline and multiplayer... so I bought in the end, 50% of the final product, considering these, the system of light and textures. The game is disposable.
    For a long time, I was surprised with RAGE, his images show a game visually compatible with the feeling that quake caused on me, look something new. It was a long download on Steam, where I bought the game. I confess that the texture cause less problems using a nvidia gpu, but the lag occurs. Was just the beginning of the frustration.
    After thousands of interviews, the good and bad sides of the new engine second John Carmack, the PC as the best visual and the product selling as the best game ever made by id! I finally bought RAGE. I bought 70% of advertising.. yes, advertising is the real seller always. Because the final product is just half of the real deal. In 10 hours, all cards, itens and quests done.. minigames and races, please...
    The best looking game! is just a pile of low res with more closed doors, than options.
    Again, the game is disposable.
    I feel cheated, it was my last effort with at id software.    … Expand
  85. Blackend
    Nov 9, 2011
    1
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This game was brilliant. The way it started, the way the story was told and everything else about it was simply faultless! The towns are fantastic, the graphics are unbelievable and enemy AI is pretty decent. The story of the game is quite thrilling as well. Yet it has one crucial fault that makes me rate it the way I have.

    The Ending. Its horrible, beyond comprehension. I"literally went "wtf just happened here?" as the credits began to roll. They ruined a marvellous game by being lazy and pushing out the game before it was ready. When I went to the last mission, I had no idea that it was the last mission. I was expecting a huge ass boss with atleast 15 mins of incredibly fast paced lobbing of grenades and bullets and maybe my brother at it to kill it. But I was greeted with a small horde of mutants and 3 buttons. Yes thats right, the glorious boss fight at the end of the game is against 3 buttons. They werent even that tough to push to be honest. There wasnt enough of the game to justify its 20gig+ size! They have somehow setup the end to signal the coming of a sequel or DLC's, but the fact is that after such a horrible experience, I will never buy anything from this game again.

    If you are a fan of endings that appeal to common sense, do not buy this crap.    … Expand
  86. Sucksit123
    Dec 28, 2011
    0
    boring,only few weapons.buggy,no leveling system,no hp bar,no **** fun at all. don't waste your time and money on this fail game.there still a display pixel problem over and over
  87. MikeJezZ
    Aug 13, 2012
    0
    Once upon a time, there was a creative guy in a basement, creating genious projects. They were Wolfenstein 3D, Doom, and several other games to follow by.

    The same guy who created these games, loved tech. High tech. Graphic and engine design was his speciality. Now John Carmack has forgotten who made him famous. Throwing all the love at the consoles, and feeding his PC enthusiasts    Once upon a time, there was a creative guy in a basement, creating genious projects. They were Wolfenstein 3D, Doom, and several other games to follow by.

    The same guy who created these games, loved tech. High tech. Graphic and engine design was his speciality.

    Now John Carmack has forgotten who made him famous. Throwing all the love at the consoles, and feeding his PC enthusiasts with with such horrindous ports, that you actually get quite angry and want a refund. Even though I bought this on sale for like 6 bucks, I felt cheated because I got some **** software that runs with 5-15 FPS on my high end where newer games runs smooth all maxed out.

    Carmack, I will NEVER buy a game from your studio again. You've proven that only the console boys mean something to you, while we PC folks apparently are nothing but trash to you.

    So much for money, right John?    … Expand
  88. mob0103
    Dec 24, 2011
    0
    Blatant money grab riding on the name of ID who in my opinion should have given up long ago. Boring single player. No deathmatch multiplayer!!! Only 2 player co-op and ordinary co-op at that. Ememies take multiple headshots to kill. Vehicle combat dominated by griefers with overpowered cars. And to top it off it's through steam meaning there is no avenue to reclaim my money .. booooooooooBlatant money grab riding on the name of ID who in my opinion should have given up long ago. Boring single player. No deathmatch multiplayer!!! Only 2 player co-op and ordinary co-op at that. Ememies take multiple headshots to kill. Vehicle combat dominated by griefers with overpowered cars. And to top it off it's through steam meaning there is no avenue to reclaim my money .. boooooooooo to you ID… Expand
  89. rasta_man2357
    Jul 10, 2012
    1
    Oh dear, I must remember never again to look forward to a new ID game. After the somewhat awesomeness of quake wars enemy territory, I had quite high hopes for the mention of a new title to add to my ever favourite game developers name and with mention of the new 'ID tech 5' engine I couldn't wait to pre-order this 'Big crazy shooter'.
    'ID tech 5' was actually just a slightly suped up    Oh dear, I must remember never again to look forward to a new ID game. After the somewhat awesomeness of quake wars enemy territory, I had quite high hopes for the mention of a new title to add to my ever favourite game developers name and with mention of the new 'ID tech 5' engine I couldn't wait to pre-order this 'Big crazy shooter'.
    'ID tech 5' was actually just a slightly suped up bulletstorm engine and was used badly. The graphics are medioca at best with many glitches, boring combat and although there are a hell of a lot of weapons, they all seem a bit, samey. Co-op was also un-surprisingly boring with hour after hour of banging one's head against the wall trying to ****ing defibrillate yourself to life.
    I enjoyed the classic ID titles: Doom, quake (Oh, I could gush about quake SO MUCH) and wolfenstein but rage is a title that should bring ID shame as such a poor comparison.    … Expand
  90. wint0nic
    Nov 16, 2011
    0
    Carmack is a joke, releasing a game in AN old engine, go learn D3D, your game doesn't even support SLi properly. No updates are being done, what a joke, spent 50 dollars for nothing, won't be buying anything from iD software anymore.
  91. kha0sman
    Apr 15, 2012
    0
    Let's see, where to start with this console ported crap... First, I couldn't play this game for many months after its release simply because one of the beginning areas wouldn't load for me, and even after they patched this up the game has severe issues that hinder gameplay such as extreme stuttering and ridiculous screen tearing, the texture popping and textures in general are terrible,Let's see, where to start with this console ported crap... First, I couldn't play this game for many months after its release simply because one of the beginning areas wouldn't load for me, and even after they patched this up the game has severe issues that hinder gameplay such as extreme stuttering and ridiculous screen tearing, the texture popping and textures in general are terrible, gameplay is really bland, and honestly, don't waste your money, a free game is better than this console ported junk.… Expand
  92. Brutal_rus
    Nov 11, 2011
    1
    Its more than 1 month after its released. But anyway after patching and up to dating drivers. Its still HAVE crashes, textures bagging...
    Story is intersting for the first 10 minutes. Gameplay is boring. Graph style is bad( borderlands and New Vegas have better...) I would not advice to buy this! **** game.
    I make 1 of 10 cause enemies have good mocap motions...
  93. bedsidetrash
    Apr 5, 2012
    0
    I assumed that technical issues would be resolved by now, so I bought it. Turns out I was wrong. I have a gtx 570 but apparently that isn't good enough to run the game without texture problems.
  94. Kenmei
    Dec 24, 2011
    0
    Horribly boring in today's age of Call of Duty style presentations, this is a game you should pass by every time. Lame story combined with just boring shooter elements, this is not a game you should be playing if your a diehard FPS fan. 10 years ago, this game would have been good. But by today's standards, this is a boring FPS that lacks the content to make it relevant. I was always a fanHorribly boring in today's age of Call of Duty style presentations, this is a game you should pass by every time. Lame story combined with just boring shooter elements, this is not a game you should be playing if your a diehard FPS fan. 10 years ago, this game would have been good. But by today's standards, this is a boring FPS that lacks the content to make it relevant. I was always a fan of the past iD games and to play such an awful game by them is depressing. Even the most diehard shooters should look elsewhere or go back to playing whatever FPS you usually play. I can promise you'll enjoy that more than you will this POS.… Expand
  95. BigJimmy1234
    Dec 28, 2011
    0
    It doesn't work on the PC.
    What more is there to say? It is a terrible PC port in which PC owners were scammed. If this was any other industry iD would be sued for sale of goods not fit for purpose.
  96. Sideras
    Jul 16, 2012
    0
    Utter **** Nothing else to say really. This game tries so hard to make you stop playing, this has got to be the shortest time I've spent in any game, and not because I wasn't willing to continue but because it wasn't even **** playable. id softwhore, welcome to my ****list.
  97. nyran125
    Nov 18, 2013
    1
    Sorry, forget the engine, forget the graphics for a minute, forget the texture issues ok? Its ok if you have the hardware after some patches.

    But lets get down to it, because i CANNOT believe ANYONE on this planet gave this game a score over 5. Have you not played it? did you finish it? Ok, its not that short if you are one of those people that like to get out the car look around and    Sorry, forget the engine, forget the graphics for a minute, forget the texture issues ok? Its ok if you have the hardware after some patches.

    But lets get down to it, because i CANNOT believe ANYONE on this planet gave this game a score over 5. Have you not played it? did you finish it? Ok, its not that short if you are one of those people that like to get out the car look around and stop and smell the roses kind of guy like i am. I love looking at the universe of everything and taking everything in in a game. A game like COD which is really short, will still take me a little longer because i read everything and kind of stop and smell the roses.

    The game starts your in an ark, you leave, go to nearest town attack some stuff, do a couple of missions check a sewer leave town, go to next town do a couple of missions do a few races fight the bad guys called Authority, open a satalite beacon thing, some things come out of the ground, that i guess have been in the earth for ages and its over. Ive gamed for a LONG long time, but i have to say what happened? Did they run out of money? it took 7 years to make this.

    But the biggest question is, how did the guys at gearbox make Borderlands in 3-4 years with MASSIVE amount of content, tons of towns, heaps to do and tons of characters, monsters, interesting stuff and RAGE took 7 years and ......

    Ok seriously, if you want this game, buy it for the IDSoftware deal on STEAM or something, RAGE will likely be included in the IDSoftware complete package at Xmas or something. But i warn you you will play it, get to the 2nd town and then get to the end and think, right the 3rd town(whatever it is, must be the last town and i'll get a finale.

    YOU WILL BE SHOCKED when you get to the end.

    IM saying this now, CALL OF DUTY the Modern warfare trilogy 1-3 was a MILLION times better than this game. Im serious. this has probably been really incoherant, because im still shocked at the ending of RAGE. People that say they werent surprised. DOOM had an ending ok? Even just the text at the end of Doom 1 or 2 was a better ending than this. Im serious.    … Expand
  98. Zonerider
    Dec 10, 2012
    2
    Wasted Potenzial. The biggest problem is the empty dead game world. After Oblivion Bethesda has forgotten the art of create living Dungeons. After Wolfenstein 3 ID has forgotten to give the Option to replay any level whis all weapons and skills. After the first visit all dungeos are empty forever, no creature will hiding in a empty hole. Its like Borderlands without enemys. Its like otherWasted Potenzial. The biggest problem is the empty dead game world. After Oblivion Bethesda has forgotten the art of create living Dungeons. After Wolfenstein 3 ID has forgotten to give the Option to replay any level whis all weapons and skills. After the first visit all dungeos are empty forever, no creature will hiding in a empty hole. Its like Borderlands without enemys. Its like other Bethesda games in the last time, wunderful ruins and dungeons but empty and boring! The simple OPTION to switch RESPAWN ON and OFF, for peoples they love it or love it not, is to complicated for ID and Beth. Shame!… Expand
  99. Mortreal
    Jul 22, 2012
    0
    The game doesn't work, it runs smooth but textures are bugged, spent two days trying everything, it won't work for me. I kinda feel like I've been stolen, we should all bring them to court and get our money back, you can't get stuff that doesn't work on the market and steal peoples money like that, this should not be legal...
  100. emperorkibbles
    Jan 25, 2013
    4
    After hearing the developers brag about this "megatextures" nonsense, the actual textures in-game are horrifyingly disappointing. In fact, almost every aspect of the game is horribly disappointing. The story might as well be nonexistent, the weapons are bland and you really don't need anything else once you get the Authority LMG (which has less recoil and a higher rate of fire than theAfter hearing the developers brag about this "megatextures" nonsense, the actual textures in-game are horrifyingly disappointing. In fact, almost every aspect of the game is horribly disappointing. The story might as well be nonexistent, the weapons are bland and you really don't need anything else once you get the Authority LMG (which has less recoil and a higher rate of fire than the assault rifle), and the shameless backtracking at parts is just unforgivable.

    I've played worse games, but this is just a generally bad game.    … Expand
Page:

Awards & Rankings

56
#56 Best PC Game of 2011
11
#11 Most Discussed PC Game of 2011
12
#12 Most Shared PC Game of 2011

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
79

Generally favorable reviews - based on 32 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 24 out of 32
  2. Mixed: 7 out of 32
  3. Negative: 1 out of 32
  1. PC Games (Russia)
    Nov 23, 2011
    80
    A pretty, fast and aggressive shooter, striving in vain to be something more. [December 2011, p.62]
  2. LEVEL (Czech Republic)
    Nov 15, 2011
    80
    Far from perfect Rage somehow is has fun post-apocalyptic action where the principles are set –fortunately – bit different than in other games of FPS genre. [Nov 2011]
  3. CD-Action
    Nov 9, 2011
    75
    It seems id Software is still living in its golden days and failed to notice that times have changed since Doom and Quake. Rage is just a decent, linear, old school shooter combined awkwardly with an arcade racing game. The world is only 'kinda openish' and the story must have been written by the coders while they were compiling the alpha version. The game looks great though – if you're lucky enough to have the it run smoothly and without technical issues that haunt the PC version. [November 2011, p.46]
See all critic reviews »