Mount & Blade: With Fire & Sword

 PC
User Score
6.9

Mixed or average reviews- based on 254 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 111 out of 254
  2. Mixed: 105 out of 254
  3. Negative: 38 out of 254

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. PenetratorGod
    Sep 3, 2023
    5
    Considering the modding support Warband offers, this game is useless next to it. Everything that this game could offer, a few people offer with their own free mods. The only thing that was left was the story, which is also quite mediocre. There are multiple story paths you can follow in the game, but none of them are detailed and entertaining enough. In short, it was a failureConsidering the modding support Warband offers, this game is useless next to it. Everything that this game could offer, a few people offer with their own free mods. The only thing that was left was the story, which is also quite mediocre. There are multiple story paths you can follow in the game, but none of them are detailed and entertaining enough. In short, it was a failure considering the series.… Expand
  2. apokalipto
    Aug 9, 2023
    8
    Very good game. I enjoyed playing this game a lot. I strongly recommend this.
  3. Nick7000
    Feb 8, 2023
    7
    Интересный сеттинг, убраны некоторые возможности, которые были в оригинальной игре, это расстраивает. В остальном это все тот же Mount and Blade.
  4. rezo_21
    Sep 19, 2021
    8
    ====================IIIIIIIIII GAME SCORE : 84 IIIIIIIIII====================
  5. Tabbou
    Jul 8, 2021
    6
    Disapointed : can't play with controller, map is empty, gun system is not good, interface is also bad
  6. Zefespo
    Jan 25, 2021
    2
    Even on the easiest difficulty, when you outnumber the enemy 2/1 you lose every battle. You constantly have to stop in towns because your troops get sick every 2 days, and you can only get around 120 troops for most of the games, while your enemies have 600, even if the have less troops, they still win no matter what.
    Would not recommend
  7. Trias00
    Aug 2, 2020
    0
    This game is straight up retarded. I'm assaulting a castle, defeat all its defenders, yet 5 of them manage to successfully repel my army just because I didn't manage to take them out 2v5 or something. So I have to assault the city again, and worse off, the dead defenders magically reappear. This game was designed by a five-year-old.
  8. Broyax
    Jul 12, 2020
    0
    Les "Mount & Blade" sont des espèces de jeux de rôle mais des "espèces" seulement, des succédanés, des ersatzs ou des mauvaises blagues, même pas drôles qui plus est... Ainsi, ce nouvel étron "With Fire and Sword" qui vient ajouter une nouvelle marque d'infamie à cette "franchise" particulièrement infâme, car c'est tout sauf du jeu vidéo ici...

    Quand on voit la gueule du truc, l'état de    Les "Mount & Blade" sont des espèces de jeux de rôle mais des "espèces" seulement, des succédanés, des ersatzs ou des mauvaises blagues, même pas drôles qui plus est... Ainsi, ce nouvel étron "With Fire and Sword" qui vient ajouter une nouvelle marque d'infamie à cette "franchise" particulièrement infâme, car c'est tout sauf du jeu vidéo ici...

    Quand on voit la gueule du truc, l'état de l'interface, la jouabilité à la rue, la présentation à l'ouest, la "campagne", la sorte d'histoire (?) sortie d'on ne sait où, on comprend que ce "machin" a été démoulé à l'arrache, programmé avec des moufles et développé avec le fion. Graphiquement, c'est évidemment des années de retard (au bas mot) sur la moyenne de la concurrence, comme tout le reste de toute façon...

    La notion d'ergonomie la plus élémentaire doit être totalement étrangère à cette bande de caves qui a bricolé ce "truc" n'importe comment et dont les "mécaniques" ne tournent clairement pas rond ou sont complètement grippées. On dirait plutôt un bidule conçu par des gens qui n'ont aucune idée de qu'ils font ou de qu'ils étaient en train de faire : franchement, ça fait peur !

    Ce "machin" qui se prétend un jeu est de fait carrément flippant à tous les égards : une daube monumentale, une daube épouvantable à fuir à toute blinde : fuyez, pauvres fous ! car on a jamais vu aussi mal fait, aussi mal foutu et aussi consternant : putain d'horreur vidéo-pas-ludique !    … Expand
  9. zzz_DeV1L_zzz
    Jun 12, 2020
    7
    Cool game. Unfortunately, it has never passed, because the tasks are monotonous, and honestly recruiting an army is very difficult and tedious. Sorry 7.
  10. erdogfu96
    Feb 8, 2020
    6
    Better than warband in every aspect. It is also same worst graphics but better than that. It is enjoying but average game. Not much moddable also.
  11. IloveIndie
    Aug 13, 2018
    7
    Artılar
    +RPG elementleri yeterli (2)
    +Yüz oluşturma ekranı yeterince detaylı (2) +Yakın dövüş mekanikleri oldukça iyi (4) +At kontrolleri rahat (2.5) -Sesler başarılı (1.5) -Müzikler güzel (2.5) +Oyun birçok dile çevrilmiş (2) Eksiler -Oyunda düşman çeşitliliği yok (3) -Kendini tekrar ediyor (4) -Aynı köye ikinci kez girerseniz köylüler farklı kişiler oluyor (1.5) -Tüfekle    Artılar
    +RPG elementleri yeterli (2)
    +Yüz oluşturma ekranı yeterince detaylı (2)
    +Yakın dövüş mekanikleri oldukça iyi (4)
    +At kontrolleri rahat (2.5)
    -Sesler başarılı (1.5)
    -Müzikler güzel (2.5)
    +Oyun birçok dile çevrilmiş (2)
    Eksiler
    -Oyunda düşman çeşitliliği yok (3)
    -Kendini tekrar ediyor (4)
    -Aynı köye ikinci kez girerseniz köylüler farklı kişiler oluyor (1.5)
    -Tüfekle düşman vurmak oldukça zor (2)
    -Bina çeşitliliği neredeyse yok (2.5)
    -Oyunun açılma süresi çok uzun (1)
    -Köylüler duvarlara takılıyor ve aynı soruyu bütün köylüler aynı şekilde cevaplıyor (1)
    Puan: 6.5/10 Tekrar eden şeyler sizi sıkmıyorsa indirim döneminde alabilirsiniz.
    -IloveIndie    … Expand
  12. Rem
    Mar 28, 2017
    6
    When adding period appropriate firearms to a base game that didn't need it in the first place to thrive, you only get a relatively small bonus to the overall experience. Of course, it's hardly the only new feature. An entirely new landmass, set of factions, and weaponry are welcome additions, but With Fire & Sword adds nothing substantial to the overall Mount & Blade experience, which isWhen adding period appropriate firearms to a base game that didn't need it in the first place to thrive, you only get a relatively small bonus to the overall experience. Of course, it's hardly the only new feature. An entirely new landmass, set of factions, and weaponry are welcome additions, but With Fire & Sword adds nothing substantial to the overall Mount & Blade experience, which is to say is still a good thing since the core mechanics that made this series addicting are still here in abundance.

    The Mount & Blade series were never known for story or technical prowess and it never pretended to be, but anybody hoping for this one to break the mold will find little improvements, if any at all. Running on the same engine, With Fire & Sword's technical strength is catering the massive battles, but everything else ranging from models to effects to texture work are all still very poor. Even the land map looks decidedly worse, and the shift to real world countries as factions ensure that the diverse locations you could explore are now limited, since the developers attempted to keep it as realistic as possible. The game this time around attempts to invest player in several plots (depending on your faction) that try their hand in a story, but the lifeless characters and general boringness of it keeps a decent story miles away.

    With Fire & Sword carries the same excellence in emulating large scale warfare, often with lines of footmen clashing with cavalry breaking lines. The addition of firearms gives you more strategy, allowing you to formulate lines of muskets to suppress enemy lines, and given that they can also be wildly inaccurate, firearms can't always be relied on. Other than that, the way combat is handled by way of momentum and direction of attack is still highly entertaining and landing blows on horseback is oddly cathartic. Outside of combat, you take on quests ranging from caravan escort to total conquest. The latter is much more fun given that conquest in this game is a great challenge and somewhat of a grind. You are able to affect your relationships from companions to towns to full blown kingdoms, most of which boil down to whether or not you were a jerk to them. The factions, while not as interesting as the diverse set found in Warband, give you enough reason to side with them if you know your European history. The most impressive feat of the overall amalgamation of the mechanics means that no two players game worlds will ever be the same. It's closer to a simulation than anything else, with so many moving pieces that while visually absent, convey that this is a real world that has some place, and that I believe is this series high point.

    With Fire & Sword isn't charged for much, so the few additions aren't as difficult to swallow. The mechanics that made this game grindy fun still exist, and are bound to soak up some serious hours. Don't expect much from this entry in terms of taking the next step, but rather riding the success of strong mechanics and features.    … Expand
  13. aswertrsx
    Dec 16, 2016
    10
    The Game Is Good I Like
    Great Multiplayer
    Take and go to the mercenaries in Russia-Mother Help bring an expensive horse to my father the king and get the village together with his oath Are tons of cattle in the village, give them holidays, thus raising the authority up to 50 Order the top armor in the game at the blacksmith in town, knowing that your village average tribute to 30K a    The Game Is Good I Like
    Great Multiplayer

    Take and go to the mercenaries in Russia-Mother
    Help bring an expensive horse to my father the king and get the village together with his oath
    Are tons of cattle in the village, give them holidays, thus raising the authority up to 50
    Order the top armor in the game at the blacksmith in town, knowing that your village average tribute to 30K a week
    Gradually taking over castles with his brothers for the of Mother Russia, all just love you, even the king, even his wife, even his daughter!

    "One Of The Best Strategies"
    Gamers Kings    … Expand
  14. jackhunter
    Apr 26, 2016
    5
    The difficulty can be frustrating even in normal, and the progression is too slownwich can make experience boring after the first dozen of hours. The tutorial isnt well made and doesnt inform you well on the differences between mercenaries from the tavern, mercenaries on the world map, and regular units you later find in cities or stronghold. The frencfh versions suffers from mistakes inThe difficulty can be frustrating even in normal, and the progression is too slownwich can make experience boring after the first dozen of hours. The tutorial isnt well made and doesnt inform you well on the differences between mercenaries from the tavern, mercenaries on the world map, and regular units you later find in cities or stronghold. The frencfh versions suffers from mistakes in translation. Currently i think this game, as well as the series it belongs too, is overrated, a good idea doesnt mean a developper is allowed to neglect elements that are essential to make experience firendly to the user and avoid confusion.… Expand
  15. seanrichardsson
    Nov 17, 2015
    10
    The game is fantastic. The fighting mechanics are second to none, and the gunplay is very well integrated, which adds another layer of challenge to combat. The campaign map is pretty much the same as Warband, except of course it depicts real locations. The quest lines are interesting, although still a bit bugged. If you love Warband and are looking for a similar experience, this game is for you.
  16. JimCorbett
    Nov 20, 2014
    6
    Basically the same as Warband except there are firearms. They change the game a lot since they're usually 1-2 hit kills. The most disappointing part was the poorly utilized "main quests" which are full of bugs and you'll often find yourself having to reload old saves to progress them. Also, the map is bad. I know it's based on real life and the factions are real life factions as well. ButBasically the same as Warband except there are firearms. They change the game a lot since they're usually 1-2 hit kills. The most disappointing part was the poorly utilized "main quests" which are full of bugs and you'll often find yourself having to reload old saves to progress them. Also, the map is bad. I know it's based on real life and the factions are real life factions as well. But the map is super boring. It's just an open flat area with a few rivers and bodies of water on the north and south. It's not interesting and makes for a mess when enemies can just wander anywhere they want since there are very few choke points.… Expand
  17. MeritCoba
    Oct 29, 2014
    5
    With Fire & Sword is a version of the game Mount & Blade, the game that claims to be a mix of a role play game and a wargame. The most obvious changes are the replacement of crossbows with firearms, a new map and the 16th/17th century setting. This is the time that warfare gradually changed from melee based to firearm based.
    (A side note: the setting actually mixes aspects of the 16    With Fire & Sword is a version of the game Mount & Blade, the game that claims to be a mix of a role play game and a wargame. The most obvious changes are the replacement of crossbows with firearms, a new map and the 16th/17th century setting. This is the time that warfare gradually changed from melee based to firearm based.
    (A side note: the setting actually mixes aspects of the 16 century setting with that of the 17th century. The halbediers belong more to the former century and the musketeers/cavalry more to the latter.)
    There some other changes. There seem to be more quests and the recruitment system has been overhauled. However, at the core the game is the same and as such has the same problems as the old game, such as a rudimentary battlefield mechanism, a nonexistent storyline, a simplistic dialogue tree, superficial boring personalities and tedious repetitive battles of which there are way too many. And these problems are now compounded by the introduction of firearms.
    With muskets you can kill an adversary from the other side of the map and what is more.. he can do the same. In fact the ai is actually better at shooting because it isn't bothered by the fact that from a distance avatars are so small that you can't make them out right.
    My first half hour was spend being shot to pieces. The only way to escape that fate is by moving in an unpredictable pattern so the enemy can't take aim properly. In the meantime you either have to try and kill them with your own firearm(while moving about in a random way!) or with your sidearm. Battles turn therefore into protracted hit and run activities in which standing still is an invite to be killed on the spot.
    The militia that you can recruit at the start is woefully inept to deal with anything better than looters and once you have enough of them to actually have a chance to win a fight, your army is so slow that you can't catch deserters, brigands and such because they are faster than you. So you either have to fight enemies who are superior to your inept troops.. or hope to corner a band of ruffians,which involves you in chasing them across the map hoping you won't loose sight of them when the night sets in or when they run into a wooded area.
    In fact the best thing to do is not to recruit any militia or infantry but to go from town to town to find and hire mercenary cavalry or heroes so you can overtake your enemies or have a chance to runaway from them when they are too strong.
    In any event the game seems to promise to become a protracted boring game, like the basic game was, but now you can use firearms and play on a map that represents eastern europe.
    The game is neither a good role play game nor a good wargame, because it doesn't implement either aspect well and it amazes me that people actually consider this game to be good.
    But I guess tastes differ..    … Expand
  18. badbd518
    Jul 31, 2014
    8
    Fun Med-Evil Warfare Combat
    Swords
    Spears Bows Axes Plus Much More This game takes a bit of time to learn how to play , After you learn how to play its a very fun game to play This is a game that will took up a lot of youre Game-Play Time this game is very fun and a good challenge The Online is fun to play with a group of friends it makes for some good times , some good laughs ,    Fun Med-Evil Warfare Combat
    Swords
    Spears
    Bows
    Axes
    Plus Much More
    This game takes a bit of time to learn how to play , After you learn how to play its a very fun game to play
    This is a game that will took up a lot of youre Game-Play Time this game is very fun and a good challenge
    The Online is fun to play with a group of friends it makes for some good times , some good laughs , and Fun to be had.
    I Give this game an 88/100    … Expand
  19. JasonTheHero
    Jul 5, 2014
    7
    First off iI was so Hyped up about thid game. So I felt so dissapointed when I realized it was a 5 times worse than I thought. There are soooo many bugs in this game and no one plays multiplayer for this game. Also the last update was in 2011. Its 2014 now. Not even 1 update to improve the game since then. It has some good features like you have have a caravan,there is also a academy whereFirst off iI was so Hyped up about thid game. So I felt so dissapointed when I realized it was a 5 times worse than I thought. There are soooo many bugs in this game and no one plays multiplayer for this game. Also the last update was in 2011. Its 2014 now. Not even 1 update to improve the game since then. It has some good features like you have have a caravan,there is also a academy where you can train your companions and you can fight in taverns for money. But they also took things out like tournaments and marraige. The graphics are also much better than warband.… Expand
  20. CaptainThom
    Jul 29, 2013
    5
    The great thing about the mount and blade series hasn't been the graphics or the story, its been the combat and With fire and sword gets that wrong. Charging at the enemy to be once shot knocked out is boring. Its also much harder to get decent troops which i found particularly annoying as it makes the start of the game much harder and frustrating.

    The game does try to introduce some    The great thing about the mount and blade series hasn't been the graphics or the story, its been the combat and With fire and sword gets that wrong. Charging at the enemy to be once shot knocked out is boring. Its also much harder to get decent troops which i found particularly annoying as it makes the start of the game much harder and frustrating.

    The game does try to introduce some amount of story but i wasn't interested enough to keep playing.    … Expand
  21. Triasadi
    Jul 12, 2013
    8
    Mount & Blade: With Fire & Sword is a very fun game and addictive game too. I really like the use of firearms in this sequel. And the single player game is great. The game's historical setting is very realistic. There are many features that I like from this sequel. But there are many bugs that are very annoying. And there isn't much plot in the game. I really hope TaleWorlds will fix this bug.
  22. MichaelKim
    Jun 27, 2013
    8
    I recently got this game when it's on sale, and have already spent many hours on it. It is a great sandbox game where you can play in whatever way you like. You can make money through trading, combat, robbery or doing quests. You can battle it all alone (thus you run faster on the map) or hire a lot of soldiers to help you out. You can fight with a sword, a lance, a bow, or a firearm. YouI recently got this game when it's on sale, and have already spent many hours on it. It is a great sandbox game where you can play in whatever way you like. You can make money through trading, combat, robbery or doing quests. You can battle it all alone (thus you run faster on the map) or hire a lot of soldiers to help you out. You can fight with a sword, a lance, a bow, or a firearm. You can befriend a faction or even joining it by helping its men in battle, or anger a faction by attacking its men. In all, how to play the game is absolutely your choice. However, the only problem (so far as I've only played for hours) is that leveling up is too slow. If you are fine with cheats, it won't be a problem for you, but I'm not, so I'm kinda losing enthusiasm. Maybe it's not a game that I should spend ten hours in one day to get a lot of achievements. But anyway, I like this game, I'm enjoying it, and I think I'll spend some time on it every day.… Expand
  23. Aedrone12
    Mar 26, 2013
    9
    This game is great, the graphics are a bit on the low side because the series started out as an indie game and went on t be successful. Anyways, the game modes are fun especially Captain CO-OP and Siege. The people on here are fun and very skilled so be careful! Buy on Steam and Enjoy.
  24. Warfororks
    Mar 2, 2013
    8
    With Fire and Sword is highly underrated. At first, I had bought this game, along with the entire series, and at first thought, thought that With Fire and Sword was the worst of the series. However, the one day I actually downloaded and played it, I had a blast literally! With Fire and Sword isn't the best of the series, but not by far. With Fire and Sword dominates Skirmish combat,With Fire and Sword is highly underrated. At first, I had bought this game, along with the entire series, and at first thought, thought that With Fire and Sword was the worst of the series. However, the one day I actually downloaded and played it, I had a blast literally! With Fire and Sword isn't the best of the series, but not by far. With Fire and Sword dominates Skirmish combat, making the player plan out a strategy, instead of just charging straight-on like the player might have done in Warband. If the player would charge, he or she would be shot down and end up losing men. Here you could take your cavalry and flank the enemy while the player's main forces are in a gunfight. However, I feel that fortress combat lacks heavily, and is in DESPERATE need of improvement. In fortress combat, you don't have full access to your structure and you can't attack from all sides. The storyline itself is intense, good minor history lesson to those who know nothing of 17th century Poland. Lastly, this game has so many minor improvements that could make Warband a better game, and so many minor improvements from Warband were left out. So, both Warband and With Fire and Sword feel incomplete to me.… Expand
  25. tacklinfuel
    Dec 30, 2012
    2
    This game was a huge disappointment. what a flaming piece of crap. I felt as if I were playing a game from the late 90's, not one released in 09'. Clunky game play, horrible graphics, and it's just weak all around. Even the tutorial was terrible.
  26. Klewer
    Nov 15, 2012
    6
    Decent follow up to Warband with new factions and the major introduction of Guns to the game changing the gameplay and your tactics. However that is all it really offers that is different and Warband is still really a better game.
  27. jimicool234
    Aug 31, 2012
    7
    Ich finde das Spiel Sehr Sehr gut gelungen und ein einfacher mod ist es nicht es hat seine eigene gute Story und es ist um längen besser als Mount & Blade: Warband, allerdings und das finde ich bei allen teilen von Mount & Blade so, das spiel ist Trocknen nach einer weile macht man nur das selbe.
  28. Cereal_Killa
    Aug 8, 2012
    0
    I got Mount and Blade in a Steam sale, and it was so bad and so unplayable that it prompted me to come here and sign up just to say how bad it is. Now I like Strategy, RPG and 4x games as much as the next person, and plan to make my own one day (hence the purchase), but right from the start, this game is so unpolished, and the graphics are so bad that it really puts me off. But despiteI got Mount and Blade in a Steam sale, and it was so bad and so unplayable that it prompted me to come here and sign up just to say how bad it is. Now I like Strategy, RPG and 4x games as much as the next person, and plan to make my own one day (hence the purchase), but right from the start, this game is so unpolished, and the graphics are so bad that it really puts me off. But despite this I struggle through to find the good Sandbox Strategy gameplay that I've heard about..
    I enter a battle and can either look for them or run away cause enemies are miles away (but somehow upon leaving I still must surrender to them???); so I re-enter and eventually find them. I gallop towards them firing off one arrow then my crossbow stops working - literally nothing is happening when I'm pressing fire (the arrow hits the ground several meters below the targeting reticule anyway), so I run them down with my horse which does 0 damage, and they beat the crap out of me, meanwhile I'm trying desperately to turn my horse or run through them; anything (nothing is happening of course as the controls are unresponsive to say the least). I die and immediately uninstall the game.

    The game is beyond poor.

    Ignoring the poor graphics, abysmal animation, terrible controls, and complete lack of a decent tutorial, underneath it all.. the game is just plain bad.    … Expand
  29. Budget_Security
    Apr 18, 2012
    5
    About as good as warband (if you dont have warband) but usually half the price. Just as in warband, the melee combat feels unbalanced/unrealistic, but I'm a good sniper so can hold my own with the muskets which are quite realistic. What stands out for me is the sometimes huge multiplayer sieges. When the game came out there was always a siege server with 200 players! The scale was epic!About as good as warband (if you dont have warband) but usually half the price. Just as in warband, the melee combat feels unbalanced/unrealistic, but I'm a good sniper so can hold my own with the muskets which are quite realistic. What stands out for me is the sometimes huge multiplayer sieges. When the game came out there was always a siege server with 200 players! The scale was epic! With some luck you might find a server with half that today, still pretty good.… Expand
  30. EwOkSeXsLaVe
    Mar 12, 2012
    1
    GUTTED FISH. Ideas/efforts were decent, but in the end, frustration. If you played M&B Warband, you will just become frustrated and not like this game, because as Warband was an "onion" with layers and layers of game play and multiple aspects to enjoy overlapping each other, relevant to the 'big picture', With Fire and Sword removes those layers and becomes only a core, a rotten one.GUTTED FISH. Ideas/efforts were decent, but in the end, frustration. If you played M&B Warband, you will just become frustrated and not like this game, because as Warband was an "onion" with layers and layers of game play and multiple aspects to enjoy overlapping each other, relevant to the 'big picture', With Fire and Sword removes those layers and becomes only a core, a rotten one. Warband had A LOT of potential, many things could've been added additionally to that type of game (and the map)... Bandit chasing/killing could've been improved and expanded on.... more quests could've been added.... the romance/dating options expanded.... etc.... This is what people expected with the next Mount and Blade game... instead they backtracked and gutted it all out, focused on 'guns' and new multiple tiers of junk gear and loot with mostly all COSMETIC features. The 17th Century theme of the game is fun to play and the new clothes and whatnot look snazzy... the guns and bombs can be fun, but without these loved aspects of the game that MADE, Mount and Blade, what is it? No character customization at the beginning or self-created story... you get a premade character to start with... which is acceptable (but why?) and the FOCUS seems to be trying to inject you into Feudal Combat or "Vassalage" as soon as possible. It seems to be the main focus, as other aspects of what it's predecessor was, arenâ… Expand
prev
Page:

Awards & Rankings

73
#73 Most Discussed PC Game of 2011
85
#85 Most Shared PC Game of 2011

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
68

Mixed or average reviews - based on 24 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 7 out of 24
  2. Mixed: 16 out of 24
  3. Negative: 1 out of 24
  1. Pelit (Finland)
    Oct 19, 2011
    83
    Good real history setting, but feels too much like a mod. Game would needs stronger and more visible plot element to differ itself from basic M&M formula. [June 2011]
  2. Games.cz
    Jul 29, 2011
    60
    An above-average game from a time period that's really hard to find in current games. It is defected by several unfortunate design decisions and by sticking too much to its literary original. However, Henryk Sienkiewicz's fans and those 17th century warfare lovers should not hesitate to try it.
    Read full review
  3. Gamer.no
    Jun 23, 2011
    60
    With Fire and Sword is an expansion that adds very little to the Mount&Blade experience. It's still a solid game, but one would expect more innovation. Still, the hectic battles on horseback leave the player with a brutal appreciation for medieval combat.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »