Medal of Honor

 PC
User Score
6.5

Mixed or average reviews- based on 657 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 267 out of 657
  2. Mixed: 257 out of 657
  3. Negative: 133 out of 657
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. joefresco
    Aug 19, 2013
    0
    Horrible multiplayer. Bad maps, bad guns, bad graphics, bad animations, bad hit registration, bad everything. Absolute junk. Bad, bad, bad, bad, 150 char.
  2. budai_adam
    Oct 16, 2010
    10
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Azután, hogy játszottam vele a nyílt beta teszten a singleplayer mód az elején nem nagyon tetszett, mert a multyplayer módhoz képest túl lassú volt a játékmenet, de a végére egész kis pörgŅ Expand
  3. kentMOsabe
    Feb 13, 2011
    0
    I agree with most 0's posted on here this is a terrible game, whoever came up with it should have been fired for coming up with such a fiasco. Not to mention it cost EA millions in investment, their shares fell, nobody bought it, I am sure that this was instantly forgotten in about two weeks. If it wasn't worth buying it the day it was released, then there is no use buying it now, I don'tI agree with most 0's posted on here this is a terrible game, whoever came up with it should have been fired for coming up with such a fiasco. Not to mention it cost EA millions in investment, their shares fell, nobody bought it, I am sure that this was instantly forgotten in about two weeks. If it wasn't worth buying it the day it was released, then there is no use buying it now, I don't think anybody actually plays it. SO the question is what the @#$%& is EA doing, what happened to the guys from Activision they hired? It would have been prudent to ask for your input since they were already hired anyway f%^% puss^ ass dumb&&*es!… Expand
  4. tsabszy
    Nov 5, 2010
    1
    "This game is about realism, not arcade shooting" How can they say such things??! I just don't understand how could be a game realistic when you can complete it on the hardest difficulty level with using only your pistol and even without any aiming you can kill your enemies mostly with head shots!! What?? I give "1" instead of "0" becouse of the work the developers invested into the game."This game is about realism, not arcade shooting" How can they say such things??! I just don't understand how could be a game realistic when you can complete it on the hardest difficulty level with using only your pistol and even without any aiming you can kill your enemies mostly with head shots!! What?? I give "1" instead of "0" becouse of the work the developers invested into the game. I'm very disappointed about this game becouse it got 75 metascore.. i know they must have given out a lot of games for free to the developers becouse of this "big name" can't get too bad reviews after all. But to say the thruth I'm happy I didn't buy it just saw it at a friend how terrible it is. I bought COD MW2 at the 1st day it came out.. the multiplayer is terrible at that game, but still I'm happy I bought that game since the single player is awsome and I re-play the game like a good movie.. but this game :( It's even too boring for the 1st play, the multiplayer is a cheap experience and it doesn't even look cool :( People out there!! If you don't want to waste your money, you just don't play with it!… Expand
  5. monkza
    Oct 27, 2010
    6
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Medal Of Honor was good before ... but now the game is a joke... seriously if u want to pay 65$ for a game whos long about 15hours++ do not buy this... the Singleplayer is really short maybe 3-4 hours max the action is good yes but the missions are so short... and im not talking about all the bug ingame... The Multiplayer is really terrible again we have killstreak who actually kill the game getting killed by a random rocket from the sky is not funny the maps are small and there is like 15 weapons... dont buy this game… Expand
  6. Suicide_Ride
    Oct 16, 2010
    3
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The Single-player is far too short. I ended the game at 4 hrs and 20 min on normal difficulty. The Multi-player is fast and clean. But there are not as many options as you have in CoD. CoD will still be the hill giant for the next few years. Modern Warfare 2 was better and Black Ops will be much better too...… Expand
  7. meatsmuggler
    Nov 8, 2010
    0
    the CRITICS that rated this game a 74 should be **** but then wait we would probally be ASSRAPING EA employees at the same time! i think EA has its employees submitting positive feedback towards it FAILURE of a game!
  8. Bobaganoosh
    Oct 19, 2010
    8
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. SP took me about 3 hours on normal...guess i know why people are saying it's too short...that and the ending isn't really spectacular, but it's legit as in - it f-ing happens in the real world. I have to say I did enjoy the SP, you're not Rambo, just a US soldier kickin some a$$...you take on roles as both Tier1 seals and Army Rangers and between them and the support they have at their disposal, you get a really cool feeling for the actual fighting going on...plus plenty of the gaming bits you need. As far as playing goes, the SP graphics are nothing spectacular (just thought i'd get that out of the way, I am a graphics guy and UE3 is oldschool...hard for me to LOVE it), and you occasionally get stuck on something or have to restart the mission because of some glitch, but shooting bad guys in this game is really fun. they change it up a little bit from the usual "you run in there and shoot 80000 bad guys while i stand here and pick my nose for a while" haha. I'd rate the SP a 7/10...1 point off for graphics and 2 points off for shortness and mild glitches.

    Played a few hours of MP and hardcore mode is F-ING HARD (which is awesome...aggravating at times, but very refreshing). I hate the MW2 killstreaks with the gunners and stuff, and these score-chain rewards are much simpler and less distracting from the gameplay.

    lack of realistic recoil is not an issue due to the small "hit-box" sizes...and there is recoil, it's just not massive. problems with it: no polish (not on same "polished" level as currentBC2(not on launch lol) or COD4), no mod-tools, no prone/lean/strafe-sprint (like BC2). overall, i had tons of fun with it tonight, had a 45ish-25ish round at the top of my team lol...that was pretty crazy. gameplay is INTENSE and i thought it was awesome. MP gameplay - 8/10.... TOTAL MoH rating from me: 7.5/10 (i'll mark 8 to offset the "low offsetters" that think they have to lie about what they're actually rating it instead of just putting their points where they belong.)    … Expand
  9. pc_gamer
    Nov 7, 2010
    3
    singleplayer score: 1. Insulting AI, horrible scripts, all linear gameplay.

    multiplayer score: 4. Better graphics and sound than SP. One good game mode (combat mission) but with only 3 maps to play. Horrible bullet registration and too large lag prediction makes it play worse than BC2 since here the maps are a lot smaller and with more cover. Poor balancing of the sniper class. Went from    singleplayer score: 1. Insulting AI, horrible scripts, all linear gameplay.

    multiplayer score: 4. Better graphics and sound than SP. One good game mode (combat mission) but with only 3 maps to play. Horrible bullet registration and too large lag prediction makes it play worse than BC2 since here the maps are a lot smaller and with more cover. Poor balancing of the sniper class. Went from clearly OP due to lag prediction, hit boxes, and one hit kill rifles to unplayable because of small maps and cover available every 5 feet.

    Overall dissapointing    … Expand
  10. Onrush
    May 29, 2015
    7
    The game delivered. Had massive fun with it in my younger days. It filled its own niche and was a relaxing break from the cod franchise. Good times, good times.
  11. iamkyo90
    May 19, 2012
    4
    The single player campaign is short, the multiplayer is abandoned. The game gives a sense of unfinished in all its aspects, graphics, sound, gameplay. Maybe they rushed to release this game, but really the Medal of Honor franchise deserves better.
  12. lhmtgame
    Aug 18, 2016
    4
    The game is ugly but using a lot of PC system resource and this is the worst FPS game ever!
    Using GTX960 and new 2015 components to run the game, the Frame rate always under 70FPS (1080p) with the choppy and lagging. I can get more than 70FPS with Rise of Tomb Raider.
    I've ever played MoH series before. But when I tried to know the gameplay and the content, I am so disappointed on it.
  13. Deadatthescene
    Oct 13, 2010
    7
    There are a lot of mixed reviews and I'm going to try and be honest here. I hate reading reviews where people are like "OMG SUCKS SO BAD." If your points aren't valid I don't think it's fair to those who worked so hard on the game.

    Given that, I think this is a solid shooter with some a couple of major overlooked issues. Starting with the single player. I played this in one afternoon.    There are a lot of mixed reviews and I'm going to try and be honest here. I hate reading reviews where people are like "OMG SUCKS SO BAD." If your points aren't valid I don't think it's fair to those who worked so hard on the game.

    Given that, I think this is a solid shooter with some a couple of major overlooked issues.

    Starting with the single player. I played this in one afternoon. Roughly 5 hours long, I felt it was concise, action packed, but on the short side. I feel that developers feel that can get away with it. But what happened to 12 hour games? This isn't no Fallout 3 (I easily spent 60 hours on that game), but 5 hours? Eh. Despite the shortness, I really enjoyed this game.

    Graphically, this game is on par with other shooters out there, nothing new and amazing, but it looks good. There are some great parts with really impressive lighting, things blow up, fire looks decent, again, on par with other shooters but nothing crazy.

    Sound, now I'm a composer and audio engineer and I thought the sound was well done. I felt that the voice overs and communication was very authentic, explosions were huge and gunfire is rock solid. A couple of strange mix decisions (the melee sounds like your hacking into a log with a big axe, a little overkill and loud). But I love the dynamics of the gunfights because you go from in your face to absolute silent desert ambiance. Strongest suit of this game has to be the audio.

    Is this game original? Meh. I felt like I was playing MW2 again. Slow motion, kicking down doors, trekking through the snow. Little bit of driving, little bit of sniping. It's all good to me, though, it sure as hell kept me entertained. I also don't know what the hell people are talking about in relation to story. Sure, the game has no real engaging story, but I feel that this flowed way better than the story in Modern Warefare 2. That game just doesn't make any sense. This actually has a flow between missions, you're never guessing what character you are playing or what your mission is, it's very straight forward. Now onto a couple of negatives now that I dug into that...

    Video cutscenes are laaaaame. I don't understand why half of the action packed parts aren't live. Maybe it has to do with rendering, conserving disk space... I don't know. But I wish the whole thing was in-game/in-engine instead of prerendered cutscenes. Just a little detail, I know, but just an observation.

    Bugs bugs bugs. Not a whole lot but sure as hell some bugs that should have been caught by QA. "Come on, follow me this way..." as he crouches in the sand... Really? You make me restart my missions because the scripts didn't work? Terrible overlook on the scripts. Tons of them were too slow or bugged out. I'd often be so far ahead I'm waiting for the guys to come to me or I'd have to go back to trigger some sort of script. This seems to be the biggest issue with the game. It took me out of the moment a couple times, but it doesn't destroy the game or render it unplayable. It's just a little frustrating at times.

    Multiplayer... This is where feelings get hurt...

    It doesn't play well in my honest opinion. I've played the Call of Duty series since the first one and they simply have the formula down. This one doesn't work. Weapons are unbalanced. No prone makes for awkwardness. Sniping and RPGs are ridiculous. The maps are teeny tiny and are not designed well. Camping galore. And spawn camping and spawn kills are also insanely stupid. And the matches seem way too short and are not as team based as they make it out to be. Honestly, skip the multiplayer. I never played BC2. So I can't compare. All I can say is I have much more fun playing MW2 than this multiplayer. Simply because it feels more balanced (minus n00b tubes and knives). There is more to choose from, and it is feature rich. YES, MW2 is more arcadey but for someone like me, I'm not looking for an ultrarealistic game. If that's what you want, neither MoH nor CoD truely offer that. The MP component on this game is dry and feels unfinished, it's really hard to explain.

    All in all. This is a renter or borrow from a friend or buy used later... You can beat the game in one day, and skip the multiplayer. Is it a terrible game? No, this is a solid game and the guys at Danger Close did a great job. Could this have been better? Oh man, my expectations were high and this game baaaarely came close. Just barely. That's why I give it a 7.    … Expand
  14. zTeFaN
    Nov 4, 2010
    1
    Stupid. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid.
  15. AlFredo2
    Aug 19, 2013
    0
    Terrible, terrible multiplayer. Physics are horrible. Running feels like you're trudging through molasses. Hit registration is terrible. Maps are tiny choke-point campfests with glitches everywhere.
  16. Rocket
    Oct 15, 2010
    5
    HI am a hard core gamers (R(+)cKeT) hi play so many games in the pass years Medal of Honor 2010 is not the best moh hi see dose pass years!!!MOH allied assault is the best moh whit score 9.1 hi ill never see MOH like pass years , EA make copy of COD 6 , EA dont have inspiration too make a very good games they make this games for $$$ , the story in this games about the same think of CODHI am a hard core gamers (R(+)cKeT) hi play so many games in the pass years Medal of Honor 2010 is not the best moh hi see dose pass years!!!MOH allied assault is the best moh whit score 9.1 hi ill never see MOH like pass years , EA make copy of COD 6 , EA dont have inspiration too make a very good games they make this games for $$$ , the story in this games about the same think of COD 6""""""" hi give 7 score for good graphic games ,,,

    hi ill never buy this games for prices is about 59.99 $ CAN money !!!    … Expand
  17. murut87
    Feb 25, 2012
    5
    well,nothing special about this game.....MOH said a true realistic-shooter game but they give us a copy-paste COD game.Multiplayer is damn good to play but single player is full of glitches and POP-UP textures.The single player story is damn forgettable and the AI is weird.....save your money on another game instead.
  18. db87
    Nov 22, 2010
    6
    Single player runs on a old game engine while the multi player doesn't. Graphics of the Single player are average. For a game of 2010 it really lacks of Physics. Single player is great but way to short. Reason for that is that the American army didn't want you to be able to play a Al-Qaeda terrorist so they dropt that part of the game completely. This game is marketed as the best shooterSingle player runs on a old game engine while the multi player doesn't. Graphics of the Single player are average. For a game of 2010 it really lacks of Physics. Single player is great but way to short. Reason for that is that the American army didn't want you to be able to play a Al-Qaeda terrorist so they dropt that part of the game completely. This game is marketed as the best shooter but that does raise the bar quite a bit to high for 'just another sequel'. So the disappointment can be quite big for multiple reasons.
    But the game doesn't do much wrong compared to its predecessors either. My personal critic of this game and many similar shooters is that you are saddled with stupid team mates that ad nothing to the game and you can not complete the mission your way. For example you can't go stealthy or take a another way, its just way to linear, just checkpoint to checkpoint. (Stupid) game developers call it the Hollywood experience. The single player is better than Battlefield: Bad Company 2 but EA shouldn't have forced to bring this game so soon to the market just to be earlier than Call of Duty Black ops.    … Expand
  19. 25yeargamer
    May 5, 2011
    5
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. finished this game the day seal team 6 killed obama ironically in about 6 hours (really short game and ending is like what?) it was a magical moment that felt like i was virtually helping in the fight from my home computer as news of bin ladens death came across t.v.. this game brought a real navy seal feel to the big gun fights and ending does have the final mission with 2 seals. it is a fun single/campaign that does totally immerse you into what it is like being in pakistan (where the real terrorist live-not afghanistan like pakistan wanted us to believe) fighting bin laden look alikes never gets old in this game and killing the pakistanis is a lot of fun and worth the 30 bucks to play for the good sound and great graphics. do not even think about mp it has like 30 players total-this is the worst multiplayer game ever played and i been playing for a long time. hit detect is awful, bullets from some guns do no damage, while you die fast from others (hackers i assume but cant tell because no killcam=fail.… Expand
  20. Arikon
    May 17, 2011
    5
    I am sorry, but bad games are bad. And this is a good example of one. The single player is decent and the graphics are good, but the multiplayer is nothing short of broken. Take bad company 2, cut the maps into about 1/10 the size and make the prone option still unavailable. Now drop the power on the guns, remove the destructible buildings, and keep the tanks overpowered. Any fun thatI am sorry, but bad games are bad. And this is a good example of one. The single player is decent and the graphics are good, but the multiplayer is nothing short of broken. Take bad company 2, cut the maps into about 1/10 the size and make the prone option still unavailable. Now drop the power on the guns, remove the destructible buildings, and keep the tanks overpowered. Any fun that was included in bad company, has been dropped in this game.… Expand
  21. snowshreder
    Dec 25, 2012
    4
    First lets do a simple comparison, Call of Duty has a good campaign and fast multiplayer environment kinda like speed ball if you will BF3 has a great campaign and a vast multiplayer instead of calling in a bomb strike like on call of duty you need to get in a plane and drop some loads. Now with that being said Medal Of Honor failed in multiple areas here, The campaign was boring andFirst lets do a simple comparison, Call of Duty has a good campaign and fast multiplayer environment kinda like speed ball if you will BF3 has a great campaign and a vast multiplayer instead of calling in a bomb strike like on call of duty you need to get in a plane and drop some loads. Now with that being said Medal Of Honor failed in multiple areas here, The campaign was boring and multiplayer is like call of duty but worse way worse it makes COD look polished. the Graphics are pretty bad the mechanics are crap especially running you get that tunnel vision when you run and cant turn quick. Overall i got the game for $10 steam holiday sale so there are no regrets but i feel MOH has had its last chance with my wallet especially with all of the advertisement which had more thought put in than that of the game.… Expand
  22. Predatorium
    Jul 5, 2016
    10
    Epic multiplayer fun! Such a small community now but it's going strong. The attraction to this game that a few people seem to understand is the absence of crazy gadgets, perks and unbalanced weapons. It's even gameplay for both teams and it's all up to skill. It has a very gritty and realistic feel to it. The weapons pack a heavy punch and they are lethal. The frostbite engine and Dice'sEpic multiplayer fun! Such a small community now but it's going strong. The attraction to this game that a few people seem to understand is the absence of crazy gadgets, perks and unbalanced weapons. It's even gameplay for both teams and it's all up to skill. It has a very gritty and realistic feel to it. The weapons pack a heavy punch and they are lethal. The frostbite engine and Dice's legendary sound design mixes the combat into something call of duty will never achieve. The sound of the weapons, explosions and the very mature language of the soldiers make this game feel like it's for older players. The 13 year olds have long ago moved on to their akimbo sprint jump 360 no scope gameplay in other games or simply matured and come back to this awesome little community of hardcore Navy SEALs going at it like real men of war. So grab your M4 and join the fight.… Expand
  23. Ghoster
    Jun 2, 2012
    6
    This game have too much bad reviews then it deserve. It's multiplayer is not close to BF awesomeness, but not bad as COD also. Some unbalanced things in game give space to some players to abuse that which sometimes ruin game to players which expect variety. Until end of the year new MOH is announced. They have only few things to make better and this game have potential to become score 10!
  24. Y4nk33
    Mar 28, 2013
    3
    How the hell could this game get bigger score than Warfighter? Graphics are very bad sometimes though its Frostbite, your weapon stands still no matter how ast you move the mouse, scripts are f****d up, you have to restart a mission in single 10 times to make it work, reflex sight looks like a piece of crap on a piece of glass, there are maximum 15 things, that fall apart if you shoot the,How the hell could this game get bigger score than Warfighter? Graphics are very bad sometimes though its Frostbite, your weapon stands still no matter how ast you move the mouse, scripts are f****d up, you have to restart a mission in single 10 times to make it work, reflex sight looks like a piece of crap on a piece of glass, there are maximum 15 things, that fall apart if you shoot the, though in battlefield bad company 2 (working with frostbite too) nearly every thing in the game fell apart if you shoot them or throw grenades at it, story sucks a lot, intro mission 30 minutes long(wtf?), your secondary weapon has infinite bullets no matter its a pistol or an MP7, friendly NPCs dont cant kill anybody, the game sometimes forgots to load the map so you just run in the nowhere, sniper rifle's scope stands still, so you dont have to hold your breath to mak it stand still. In multiplayer is no killcam so the campers give you spawnkill every damn time.… Expand
  25. Kazuma92
    Jul 31, 2014
    9
    My Favorite Military Arcade shooter. One big diamond! (Lower the sound a little bit, and hear the music in the game.) Its a little short, but its intense, dramatic (on hard difficulty of course).
  26. Mahdiar
    Jul 6, 2016
    7
    Gameplay : 7
    Graphics : 8
    Story : 7
    Sound : 8
    **********************************************************************************
    Overall : 7
  27. drivewa-y
    Jun 13, 2014
    9
    Apesar do jogo ser de 2010, é um ótimo jogo para a época.
    Gráficos não são das melhores qualidade mas a história que o jogo aborda é íncrivel, a única coisa ruim do jogo é que ele é curto não há muitas histórias no caminho.
  28. crabman323
    Jan 3, 2016
    10
    I dont understand why scores are so low. This game is actually one of the greatest fps ever. The battle sense is perfect, graphics cool . frostbite engine is flawless , team is awesome . preacher, mother, dusty, voodoo , rabbit exc. Buy and play it.
  29. ChaosHydrA
    Mar 28, 2015
    3
    One of the absolute worst FPS games i have ever played on PC. Disjointed story that switches between groups makes you never feel for the character or the one you control. Its a great example of how far the FPS genre has moved while this game seems stuck in the era the first Medal of Honor Allied Assault was released in. Todays war fps games might still have too many cliches and the sameOne of the absolute worst FPS games i have ever played on PC. Disjointed story that switches between groups makes you never feel for the character or the one you control. Its a great example of how far the FPS genre has moved while this game seems stuck in the era the first Medal of Honor Allied Assault was released in. Todays war fps games might still have too many cliches and the same gameplay mechanics but most of the best ones make up for it in other departments like gameplay variation and extremely satisfying weapon/gun play mechanics.

    Medal of Honor however doesnt bring anything to the table, from a boring amount of weapons in a abysmal short 5 hour singleplayer campaign to the same type of missions throughout where you keep assaulting forward against fodder enemies and plow them down easily to missions where youre being dictated by the friendly npcs to constantly follow evens that might aswell have been quicktime events.

    The PC version is also suffering from consolitus which means you will be having a magnifying glass FOV at "55" thats bound to cause motion sickness for most me included, its something thats only changeable by searching for a third party program for the single player campaign.

    The visuals arent too bad but the early night missions in the city & villages definitely look more outdated than some of the later missions. The only positive i can say about this game is that the audio & mic communication dialogue is pretty good between the npc's, it does a decent job at making you feel youre in a special team or warzone.

    Theres no reason to replay this game, the single player is a flat experience thats over too quick and the weapons dont have a feel of "oomph" like the better FPS games in its release day or the years around it.

    Graphics: 7.0/10
    Sound: 8.0/10
    Gameplay: 6.0/10
    Replay Value: 3.5/10

    Overall: 5.5/10    … Expand
  30. jelikey
    Sep 10, 2015
    8
    The game is anything but CoD in the singleplayer. That's probably it's biggest issue. Nothing too over-the-top is happening, but the attention to detail is mind-boggling once you look into it. The story took me a good 8 hours to complete, on Hard difficulty (anything lower is just for content tourists, if you ask me), and it was indeed impressive.
  31. shafzxx
    Oct 29, 2016
    9
    I only played single player which was very good. I'd recommend it a single player gamer. I played it when it was out but writing the review now :p..
  32. ruvinisimus
    Nov 2, 2017
    4
    Крайзис лучше, там было ощущения что я иду куда хочу, а тут я должен идти по "рельсам" и по контрольным точкам, это скучно/
  33. dimadima423212
    May 3, 2022
    9
    Игра хорошая, наконец-то медаль за отвагу не вторую мировую войну, а про современную войну, где уже что-то новое, и где больше эффектов, есть разрушаемость, прокачка, современная техника, и наконец медаль за отвагу перешла на новый уровень, почему так люди оценили плохо, вроде-бы хорошая игра, может из-за того что не привыкли что медаль за отвагу стала про современную войну, и это хотя быИгра хорошая, наконец-то медаль за отвагу не вторую мировую войну, а про современную войну, где уже что-то новое, и где больше эффектов, есть разрушаемость, прокачка, современная техника, и наконец медаль за отвагу перешла на новый уровень, почему так люди оценили плохо, вроде-бы хорошая игра, может из-за того что не привыкли что медаль за отвагу стала про современную войну, и это хотя бы современный мир чтоб делать такие стили, но стиль нормальный, игру стоит ли брать, ну да, но лучше на xbox 360, потому что там есть достижения, но на playstation 3 поменьше fps, и графика немножко похуже, но есть приятные кнопочки для меня, и когда получаешь достижения, там показывает картинку достижения, но лучше брать на xbox 360, но в steam показывает сколько ты поиграл времени эту игру.
    Вывод, игра хорошая, стоить её покупать на ps3, steam, xbox 360, потому-что игра хорошая, но надо с начало пройти сюжет, а потом можно играть в сетевую игру, хотя наоборот это плюс, но сюжет тяжёлый, противники очень мощные, игра не заслуживает такую низкую оценку, заслуживает повыше, это лучше чем другие части медаль за отвагу!    … Expand
  34. bullett
    Sep 24, 2013
    4
    It's too easy, it's too short (sub 5 hours for a mediocre player like me) and it's agonisingly linear.
    There is very little story or any emotional investment in the characters as they chop and change so often. It holds your hand for most of the time and then misses out critical information (like use 4 to target the mortars in the gunfighter mission). There are invisible walls everywhere    It's too easy, it's too short (sub 5 hours for a mediocre player like me) and it's agonisingly linear.
    There is very little story or any emotional investment in the characters as they chop and change so often. It holds your hand for most of the time and then misses out critical information (like use 4 to target the mortars in the gunfighter mission). There are invisible walls everywhere and the AI on both sides is very stupid glitching on scenery and failing to trigger the next section in some cases.
    On the upside it looks very nice, the voice acting is excellent as is the sound work. I liked the few bits of variety we did get (helicopters, sniper sections) but these were very limited compared to the corridor shooter of the rest of the game.
    I've not tried multiplayer but frankly I can't really be bothered as I already have CoD and CS available as military shooters.
    If you are looking for a great shooter with a story look elsewhere. If you want a few hours mindless blasting and can pick this up cheap then give it a go.    … Expand
  35. Dubroc
    Feb 17, 2013
    6
    Game style like Call Of Duty Modern Warfare or Battlefield 3, but never to live up to these. The story is weak and it feels incomplete without a clear purpose. The gameplay is pretty good, but neither is at the level of its competitors.

    Only recommended if you get it at a low price and if you have played the games mentioned above.
  36. DGDrocks7
    Aug 23, 2014
    7
    This game is not as bad as critics say. It's better than I thought it would be. The singleplayer story isn't full of twists and turns, it's more like a tribute to US and NATO troops. Keep it mind as you play the story, many of what you see is happening right now in Afghanistan, especially when you switch to play as a Ranger (most of the time you play as a Navy SEAL). You could feel asThis game is not as bad as critics say. It's better than I thought it would be. The singleplayer story isn't full of twists and turns, it's more like a tribute to US and NATO troops. Keep it mind as you play the story, many of what you see is happening right now in Afghanistan, especially when you switch to play as a Ranger (most of the time you play as a Navy SEAL). You could feel as though you were there. For that, the singleplayer was great. My gripe about it is that it can be finished in 6 hours. And I was playing on the hardest difficulty. Was the game that easy, or is it that I'm good at first-person shooters? The multiplayer, well, that's a different story. I don't know how it has been in the past, but right now, I don't like it. You frequently get spawn-killed and everyone seems to spam grenade and rocket launchers. Some say, it's a combination of Call of Duty and Battlefield. From what I played, I still haven't decided if that's a good or bad thing.

    In the end, where CoD and Battlefield excels in multiplayer, MoH excels in singleplayer. Having been a fan of MoH since 2002, I don't think MoH was meant for MP. Back when the game first came out, I would definitely recommend a rental for the singleplayer. Now that the game is cheap, it's worth buying, so you can check the multiplayer and judge for yourself, but, as I've said, MoH was always a SP game. One day, I'll check on MoH:Warfighter, and see how that game was so bad, EA is putting the series on hold.    … Expand
  37. ogower
    Aug 13, 2015
    5
    Fun enough in its own way but nothing like the triumph that was the original and nothing like it could be given that this is over a decade later. My main issue is that this is the dictionary definition of linear, where deviating even a fraction from the often dull script set out leads to instant death, reflecting lazy design.
  38. JimCorbett
    Aug 15, 2013
    4
    Bug and glitches plague this game. It's sad really, because some parts of it are very well done. The sounds and graphical effects are among the best I've seen. Just about everything else is poorly done. Squad mates are constantly getting in your way, you're given vague objectives and will often times not know what to do. Sometimes your squad mate will say "Take out that enemy right there!"Bug and glitches plague this game. It's sad really, because some parts of it are very well done. The sounds and graphical effects are among the best I've seen. Just about everything else is poorly done. Squad mates are constantly getting in your way, you're given vague objectives and will often times not know what to do. Sometimes your squad mate will say "Take out that enemy right there!" Where? "He's right there! Get him so we can move on!" Yeah, terrible AI. Enemies spawn right next to you and move awkwardly, sprinting is pretty much the same exact speed as walking, uninspired level design, 4 hour long campaign... the list goes on and on.

    It's a shame. I really wanted to like this game as I'm a huge fan of the franchise. All we can hope for now is that EA can get a brain and take the franchise back to its roots... singleplayer campaign focused, no squad mates, WWII setting...    … Expand
  39. MuNyOsZ
    Feb 18, 2013
    8
    Along with the enjoyable storyline, the singleplayer has beautiful graphics, great weapon modelling and surprisingly clever AI. If I’m honest the only problems with the singleplayer are that it has too many cutscenes, beautiful, but too many, and that it takes no more than 3 hours to complete on the hardest difficulty level. Both the multiplayer and the singleplayer are great fun andAlong with the enjoyable storyline, the singleplayer has beautiful graphics, great weapon modelling and surprisingly clever AI. If I’m honest the only problems with the singleplayer are that it has too many cutscenes, beautiful, but too many, and that it takes no more than 3 hours to complete on the hardest difficulty level. Both the multiplayer and the singleplayer are great fun and involve hugely satisfying action. Although the multiplayer provides some fast-paced action, it is mostly team work based, so if you are looking for a CoD like multiplayer experience, where you just run around aimlessly shooting whoever you see, then this game is not for you (well, not its multiplayer anyway…). Otherwise, the multiplayer provides hours of additional fun with its refreshingly challenging game play. As I’ve already mentioned, it focuses extensively on teamwork and also encourages a cover-to-cover, tactical play style. I think that this is one of the best shooters that I have played in years, definitely better than some of the latest CoD titles.… Expand
  40. l0rdm0rd
    Aug 17, 2013
    2
    The worst single player shooter I have played in a long time. super generic, linear, boring level design with thousands of blatantly stupid AI enemies that fall like flies. I played the whole game through in hard mode and it was never a challenge. I could run to the enemy spawn and stab them to death more than once. The story is generic US american about heroes in a seal team that shootsThe worst single player shooter I have played in a long time. super generic, linear, boring level design with thousands of blatantly stupid AI enemies that fall like flies. I played the whole game through in hard mode and it was never a challenge. I could run to the enemy spawn and stab them to death more than once. The story is generic US american about heroes in a seal team that shoots everything that moves. The weapons all feel the same, none are really fun. I just used the pistol as my main gun at some point to give me some alteration and a bit of a challenge. But as you have practically unlimited ammo all the time you can also just go full auto and run around like a mental. You will still be successfull. 2 points only for nice sound and okay graphics. But for a frostbyte engine there is nearly no destructable environment.… Expand
  41. kane148
    Aug 6, 2012
    7
    I bought this solely for the single-player campaign and was not disappointed. The gameplay is much like the Modern Warfare games: heavily scripted with few tactical options and the usual assortment of spec forces weapons. What I really enjoyed, however, was the story and characters. Unlike COD, there aren't any massive invasions, nuclear weapons, or evil masterminds, and while the mainI bought this solely for the single-player campaign and was not disappointed. The gameplay is much like the Modern Warfare games: heavily scripted with few tactical options and the usual assortment of spec forces weapons. What I really enjoyed, however, was the story and characters. Unlike COD, there aren't any massive invasions, nuclear weapons, or evil masterminds, and while the main characters are obviously elite, they are just men--no superheros. I found it refreshing to play a game with believable scenarios where doing important stuff doesn't mean saving the world for the fourth time. I would have really liked it if this game had additional single-player content (bonus missions, survival mode, etc.) but since I only paid $5 for it on Steam, I suppose I can't complain.… Expand
  42. guildleader117
    Nov 14, 2012
    7
    When it comes to graphics and artwork it looks amazing. But getting down to the core experience of the game it lacked a little. The campaign has it's fair share of surprises but is brought back down to earth when it becomes a little repetitive. Definitely a big improvement from danger closes first game back in 2010. When it comes to multiplayer the maps seem to be unbalanced but thatWhen it comes to graphics and artwork it looks amazing. But getting down to the core experience of the game it lacked a little. The campaign has it's fair share of surprises but is brought back down to earth when it becomes a little repetitive. Definitely a big improvement from danger closes first game back in 2010. When it comes to multiplayer the maps seem to be unbalanced but that can change depending on how well you work with your squad mates. Overall this game has action and a strong competitive nature that will keep you coming back for more. So grab a few buddies and maybe a couple beers and dive into the action!… Expand
  43. Klewer
    Sep 13, 2013
    6
    A solid modern shooter that does the basics well with strong graphics, sound and gameplay mechanics. But it really brings nothing new or overly interesting to the genre. Very linear and predictable makes this game quite boring at times.

    Worth a look if a fan of modern shooters but nothing extraordinary to see here.
  44. nitai007
    May 1, 2013
    8
    while medal of honor is a bit short, its still a really good game. it has little innovations over other games, but this is still a great shooter. what makes medal of honor unique and good, is that it actually makes sense. the game is based on operation anaconda in 2002. this makes the game much more realistic. the story isnt about saving the world or stopping nuclear war, its aboutwhile medal of honor is a bit short, its still a really good game. it has little innovations over other games, but this is still a great shooter. what makes medal of honor unique and good, is that it actually makes sense. the game is based on operation anaconda in 2002. this makes the game much more realistic. the story isnt about saving the world or stopping nuclear war, its about fighting the taliban and al-qaeda. the plot is really good, and it serves a great and good change from modern "save the world" games. the game also happens in believable locations. you fight in deserts, little villages and snowy mountains. the locations feel realistic, and dont make you jump from one place to another like an action movie. the enviroments are varied as well. the story talks about the brotherhood between the soldiers, and not just being about stone hearted killers (dont worry, you still play as an elite force that arent afraid to pull the triger).
    unfortunetly, the game is pretty short. it also has a big amount of bugs. besides this issues the game is amazing. it doesnt do a lot new but its realisticness and honor for the soldiers really make it much more than an average shooter!!!!!! buy it!!!!!    … Expand
  45. azgoodaz
    Mar 9, 2017
    5
    Does Medal of Honor (2010) still hold up?

    I didn’t even finish the game. The game didn’t let me go past the 3rd to last mission. I keep getting put into a place where to defend a position and yet I hold it for 10 minutes and nothing happens. I tried restarting the checkpoint and that doesn’t work. Other than that, the audio/dialogue is great and for being a 2010 game, the game    Does Medal of Honor (2010) still hold up?

    I didn’t even finish the game. The game didn’t let me go past the 3rd to last mission. I keep getting put into a place where to defend a position and yet I hold it for 10 minutes and nothing happens. I tried restarting the checkpoint and that doesn’t work.

    Other than that, the audio/dialogue is great and for being a 2010 game, the game graphics of destruction, gun sounds and small ambient sounds make the game enjoyable. Truly the only good thing about this game is the hell fighter bomb run and ATV part. The AIM sensitivity and unoptimized screen tearing is what makes the game sometimes unplayable.

    What are flaws? Lowering AIM sensitivity does nothing (it’s really fast when you move the mouse). If you try to launch the game via Origin, you will get fail launch message that states “General protection fault!” error (which they still haven’t fixed) there is no workaround this if you launch it via Origin.

    You will have to play the game without Origin (by putting the game on your desktop, read down below for the steps) if you want to play the campaign. I was playing on 1920x1080 and I sensed the game was causing screen tearing during gameplay and it will sometimes do a millisecond freeze. Running/sprinting seems slow and cutscenes seem unfinished. Plus 0 achievements for PC users, only the consoles got this.

    Want to play the campaign but you can’t because of the error? Go to the Drive where you installed | MoH > Origin Games > Medal of Honor > Binaries > Open “moh” file (right click and press ‘send to desktop’).

    Note: In the same binarie folder, find a file named “MoHUpdater” and run that as a Admin so that you can apply the patch. If not, you will not be able to play.    … Expand
  46. Disacar
    Aug 17, 2013
    7
    Yes its a CoD copy with a much better sound engine/shooter mechanics but with weak character development (i think im pointing this in every game i played recently...) and plot. A lot of AI malfunction and gamebreaking moments but Fun to play, i d give a 6 if it wasnt for the amazing sound engine.
  47. aborle
    May 25, 2013
    6
    **SP ONLY**
    I kinda actually like this game, even though i will not give it higher than 6/10 The first thing is like is that this game differentiates itself from its cousins (CoD and BFs) by being very focused on the US special forces Seals and Rangers to be specific. It was interesting to follow the operatives story and see how it plays out. The pacing itself is better than CoD (ie its    **SP ONLY**
    I kinda actually like this game, even though i will not give it higher than 6/10 The first thing is like is that this game differentiates itself from its cousins (CoD and BFs) by being very focused on the US special forces Seals and Rangers to be specific. It was interesting to follow the operatives story and see how it plays out. The pacing itself is better than CoD (ie its not over the top action set pieces all the time)

    That being said, there is nothing new in this game. The gunplay is solid but nothing new, the story needed something more to be able to stand out and the linearity gets annoying sometimes.

    Final verdict, Its NOT BAD but its JUST OK. Get it on a sale if you like such Modern Military Shooters.    … Expand
  48. sft
    Jul 12, 2015
    7
    An honorable effort

    I only own this game because it came as part of a bundle, and it's not something I would normally play (as a rule I prefer to battle zombies, mutants, and aliens). I was, however, pleasantly surprised by MEDAL OF HONOR. It's a good solid shooter with nice graphics and a realistic atmosphere. The combat is satisfying and reasonably challenging, and it doesn't hold the    An honorable effort

    I only own this game because it came as part of a bundle, and it's not something I would normally play (as a rule I prefer to battle zombies, mutants, and aliens). I was, however, pleasantly surprised by MEDAL OF HONOR. It's a good solid shooter with nice graphics and a realistic atmosphere. The combat is satisfying and reasonably challenging, and it doesn't hold the players hand as much as some games. The single player campaign is, however, very short, at around 6 hours of play, but as I got it pretty much for free I can't complain about that. I can't comment on the multiplayer mode because I haven't played it but the single player part is fun just as long as you don't expect too many hours gameplay from it.    … Expand
  49. Neddy
    Jul 2, 2014
    6
    Medal of Honour Airbourne shook my heart, and I cried a little at the end. This Medal of Honor, yes I was emotional a little at the end. You feel, 'Oh no, do the armed forces and the honest Afganistan folk have to go through this'.

    It had the odd error and unclear direction: An objective did not trigger in one place for me, and was stuck facing infinite foes until I run out of ammo.    Medal of Honour Airbourne shook my heart, and I cried a little at the end. This Medal of Honor, yes I was emotional a little at the end. You feel, 'Oh no, do the armed forces and the honest Afganistan folk have to go through this'.

    It had the odd error and unclear direction:

    An objective did not trigger in one place for me, and was stuck facing infinite foes until I run out of ammo. Ah maybe it was me, I'll reload the checkpoint. Same again. Gone through 500 rounds in a rifle that fires single shots, emptied my automatic rifle, and using pistol (that has infinite ammo.) Usually you press F next to a team-mate to get ammo, but in this scenario, they say you have plenty. Even though I am out.

    Anyway I restarted the mission and I was OK. It played out that time as it should.

    Helicopter work. Where in the controls does it say how to fire Hellfire missiles. IT DOESN'T. I had to google for it, after repeating stuff over and over. Next time I noticed there was a quick message flashed up on the screen with instruction how to use. I didn't see it before because I was fighting. Plus I was too busy concentrating on the ENDLESS CHATTER OVER THE RADIO.

    The squelshy squaly endless rubbish banging on over the radio. It talks to you through about 2/5 of the game.

    The graphics and scenery are awesome in places. It opens nicely, and the closing scenes in the mountains and snow are beautiful.    … Expand
  50. Desmau5
    Aug 22, 2013
    3
    It's a game about realism, so it disabled the HUD.

    It still shows bodyshots and headshots when you kill an enemy, and the guns have no recoil. Enemy AI is very limited to what its scripted to do, the enemies will never change and always be predictable. The gameplay is stale, it has less character then a cardboard box. It usually limits to: You're a bad-ass, shoot people cause they    It's a game about realism, so it disabled the HUD.

    It still shows bodyshots and headshots when you kill an enemy, and the guns have no recoil.
    Enemy AI is very limited to what its scripted to do, the enemies will never change and always be predictable.

    The gameplay is stale, it has less character then a cardboard box.
    It usually limits to: You're a bad-ass, shoot people cause they aren't American.

    Multiplayer is not very fun, boring and badly designed maps, and the servers are usually dead, the EXP and leveling system is very cliche.

    Singleplayer is 2 hours of torture, you go through Afghanistan and kill people, and the guns are unrealistic and you run very slowly, enemies are not scared of being shot in the face, if you shoot a enemy in the face with the pistol, he shrugs it off like nothing happens, when you shoot his feet on accident, he screams in pain and moves back into cover.

    This is a bad game, it tried to hard to be a good game, and didn't put any effort into characters.    … Expand
  51. csabber
    Sep 14, 2013
    5
    It was supposed to be the game that would break Activision's CoD empire, it was supposed to be the game that would reestablish the once great Meda of Honor name. Now, it's a game that will no-one remember and the game that fell short in every aspect it could have.

    The story of MoH itself is uninteresting, undercooked and short. The game can be finished in a mere 5 hours on normal    It was supposed to be the game that would break Activision's CoD empire, it was supposed to be the game that would reestablish the once great Meda of Honor name. Now, it's a game that will no-one remember and the game that fell short in every aspect it could have.

    The story of MoH itself is uninteresting, undercooked and short. The game can be finished in a mere 5 hours on normal settings, without any, and I mean ANY replay value. There aren't any collectibles, multiple paths or story elements that would encourage the player to start the game all over again. Once you have finished it semi-frustrated there is no going back to it. Frustration is a concept that will many of us have to face in MoH. The super-linear nature of the discourages any way of alternate pathfinding. To put it simple, if you don't do what the game says you to do, you're dead. Don't try to be a hero, as you always have to follow instructions to survive. If you are told to hold position, don't try to peek above the wall, because you are getting shot. If you are told to run or retreat don't try to stay and hold off the enemy as they will kill you...sometimes even behind cover.

    Not is all bad about the game however. Two things stand out the most. The graphics are beautiful even on medium settings. Water, rocks, buildings and shadows look astonishing. The other thing where you have to give credit to the creators is trying to maintain authenticity. Places, soldiers, the way they talk to each other, situations all feel real to a person who is inexperienced in war situations. The game itself takes place in Afghanistan and it's plot is loosely based on the Operation Anaconda where US soldiers tried to destroy Taliban forces back in '02.

    I can honestly say that I haven't seen a game that would want YOU to rush through it's single player mode. This game does. For one thing its ultra short. Experienced player can finish it in 4 to 5 hours easily, and checkpoints are so frequent that even if you happen to die, you won't be set back for more than 2 minutes of your progress. Literally, a level starts with an in-game cinematic and a shepherd is taken down silently by your fellow soldier, and boom checkpoint. Sometimes it feels like the game throws you a CP every time you reload you weapon. The level design is also horrible, excluding the first few stages, on all of the levels there is 1 hard point where you are so overwhelmed that you will die 3-10 times in 5 minutes. Up until that point and even after that there is little to no resistance. To put it gently, it's unbalanced.

    When you get frustrated (and you'll get) by the SP you can try the Tier1 mode, which is unlocked once you've completed the SP on any difficulty. Basically, Tier1 is the same as the SP just with some gameplay tweaks, e.g. difficulty is set to hard and you have no restarts. Once you die, you have to start over again. There is a time limit in each level that you have to beat, and headshots will freeze the timer for a couple of seconds. To conserve time there aren't any cutscenes either. This mode really is for hardcore MoH players and I doubt that any of the one-timers will enjoy it.

    And finally there is MP. Crafted from scratch with Frostbite it's completely a different game. This is the best part of the game hands down. You can choose a class with different set of weapons and level yourself up the get better in hunting down the opposition. You can engage in different type of game modes like: Team Assault (deathmatch), Sector Control (capture the flag), Clean Sweep (deathmatch without respawns) or Objective Raid (attack or defend certain assets) among others. It doesn't introduce anything new, but at least what it does, it does very well. No question that if you are an experienced FPS player you should skip the SP in its entirety and go straight to the MP to have some fun.

    Rating: 55/100; Replay Value: 1/5; To Beat: 5 hours; Played on: normal.    … Expand
  52. ArthurVon
    Aug 23, 2013
    3
    I remember the old Medal of Honor games, this is a shame for the brand, this game has bugs(not to mention the DUMBEST AI I ever seen, even in Hard mode) and stupid things (your teammates carries infinite ammo and you can't, WTF The game is boring, the story is poorly written (the same story about the evil middle-east guys bla bla bla), I don't know what is good about this game...luckily iI remember the old Medal of Honor games, this is a shame for the brand, this game has bugs(not to mention the DUMBEST AI I ever seen, even in Hard mode) and stupid things (your teammates carries infinite ammo and you can't, WTF The game is boring, the story is poorly written (the same story about the evil middle-east guys bla bla bla), I don't know what is good about this game...luckily i got this with a bundle of other games for just 1 not worth a penny tho.… Expand
  53. tetrasaure
    Aug 25, 2013
    8
    The story was continuous instead of other games modern games where the story has to jump through time. I wish there was a little more of an loft objective to the game other than Rabbit dying at the end for the medal of honor and the game was a little short. Overall a great shooter and you won't be sorry.
  54. delaiah
    Sep 2, 2013
    3
    Played only the single player campaign. If you plan on buying this game, get ready for bugs (I had to reload the game plenty of times to be able to perform some in game action needed for level progress), stupid opponents, practically no story line, immortal team members, confusing level design and confusing graphic design at times.

    Because of these, I found the game hard to enjoy. The    Played only the single player campaign. If you plan on buying this game, get ready for bugs (I had to reload the game plenty of times to be able to perform some in game action needed for level progress), stupid opponents, practically no story line, immortal team members, confusing level design and confusing graphic design at times.

    Because of these, I found the game hard to enjoy. The enemies are too easily to eliminate to feel any satisfaction, the bugs make you fight the game itself instead of the bad guys. The absence of a story line and uninspired levels got me bored too quickly too often.

    Overall, this is not a title you want to spend your on unless it's on a huge sale and you're out of FPS games at the moment.    … Expand
  55. SolidState
    Sep 4, 2013
    2
    Disappointing. The stoy is too short and completely uninteresting. Super-easy even on the hardest setting. Not challenging at all. Really good graphics and even better sound, but its flaws kill the sense of immersion completelly. It's too linear, you're always led, directed by a squadmate who tells you exactly what to do, and don't you dare doing something different because then the gameDisappointing. The stoy is too short and completely uninteresting. Super-easy even on the hardest setting. Not challenging at all. Really good graphics and even better sound, but its flaws kill the sense of immersion completelly. It's too linear, you're always led, directed by a squadmate who tells you exactly what to do, and don't you dare doing something different because then the game goes from absurdly-easy to totally-imposible. Sometimes it feels more like watching a (very boring) film than playing a game.

    It's a real shame, because the gameplay is really good and you're put into very different situations, it's just the total lack of freedom that ruins it all.

    Could've been a 8 or 9 but for me it never got past 2.    … Expand
  56. DeathtoSpongify
    Sep 20, 2013
    8
    Although EA didn't manage to beat out the CoD experience with this game, they did provide a solid shooter experience, though it may be more ephemeral than they would have liked. This doesn't really add anything new to the shooter scene, and although it's great for fluid mechanics, good graphics and a constant adrenaline rush, it is in the end forgettable. In another place and time, it mayAlthough EA didn't manage to beat out the CoD experience with this game, they did provide a solid shooter experience, though it may be more ephemeral than they would have liked. This doesn't really add anything new to the shooter scene, and although it's great for fluid mechanics, good graphics and a constant adrenaline rush, it is in the end forgettable. In another place and time, it may be considered groundbreaking, but in the end Medal of Honor feels an awful lot like another shooter following the crowd. The game is definitely more realistic than the CoD franchise, with obvious pains taken to make the characters and story believable. Unfortunately, there isn't enough story to give the player a sentimental attachment, and that is a major shortcoming. All this granted, Medal of Honor is still a great shooter.… Expand
  57. JimGee
    Sep 21, 2013
    4
    This game is probably best described as one of those big, dumb action movies that make no sense but are so fun to watch. There's basically nothing else going for this game, though. It's literally a note-for-note copy of Call of Duty, and it's not subtle about it either. The game is also criminally short at four hours; I completed it at 3 hours after I bought and installed it.

    Oh well.    This game is probably best described as one of those big, dumb action movies that make no sense but are so fun to watch. There's basically nothing else going for this game, though. It's literally a note-for-note copy of Call of Duty, and it's not subtle about it either. The game is also criminally short at four hours; I completed it at 3 hours after I bought and installed it.

    Oh well. It was worth the five bucks. If you happen to catch it on sale, pick it up. It's not bad, it's just below average.    … Expand
  58. sant_antonio_ro
    Sep 30, 2013
    8
    Personally, i think MoH is a really fun game. You shoot a lot, in a intelligent way. You use a lot the zoom. You drive a quad, you are in an helicopter and shoot rockets. I mean, what do you want from a wargame? I like the levels and the miossions too. The siege, ehan you are Adams, is a hell!
    Maybe It is not too hard. I play it at hard and I rarely die. I don't know how the multiplayer    Personally, i think MoH is a really fun game. You shoot a lot, in a intelligent way. You use a lot the zoom. You drive a quad, you are in an helicopter and shoot rockets. I mean, what do you want from a wargame? I like the levels and the miossions too. The siege, ehan you are Adams, is a hell!
    Maybe It is not too hard. I play it at hard and I rarely die. I don't know how the multiplayer is, but the single one, at hard mode, is a must play. ow oyu can find it also at low price! A must play-must buy! For me, an 8.    … Expand
  59. kamikung
    Oct 12, 2013
    6
    useless AI but good story. enjoy if u wanna look at the story. it can be better if them make a good AI NOTTTT!! useless skill.
    -im boring when shoot them all and problum bug sometime.
  60. Keychain
    Nov 1, 2013
    8
    Medal of Honor from a gameplay perspective, is quite generic. You take cover, you shoot stuff with the ironsights on, take cover in order to regenerate your health. This has caused a lot of criticism from people. But if you look underneath that exterior of a generic game you may just find something much more worth your while.

    As a lot of people may or may not know, the events in this    Medal of Honor from a gameplay perspective, is quite generic. You take cover, you shoot stuff with the ironsights on, take cover in order to regenerate your health. This has caused a lot of criticism from people. But if you look underneath that exterior of a generic game you may just find something much more worth your while.

    As a lot of people may or may not know, the events in this game are based on real-life events. This includes the characters, as they maintain their actual military codenames that they had. When you play this game and realize that this is based on something that happened in real life, specific events and scenarios that take place during the game, especially at the end, it just wrenches you right in the heart. It's a story worth listening to, and makes the gameplay much more tolerable when you engage yourself with the story.

    Though you'd probably be better off waiting for a sale, this game is by far worth picking up. It has a story to tell, it has a campaign with constantly changing events that keeps your interest peeked, it's worth checking out. I highly recommend it.    … Expand
  61. huss2215
    Nov 14, 2013
    7
    Graphics: The graphics aren’t the best I’ve seen, but they still look pretty damn good. 9.
    Sound: Nice soundtrack, good voice acting, the games guns sounds are okay not the best, and there’s minor grenade explosions, and other destruction sounds that aren’t realistic. 8.5.
    Gameplay: The game is an fps that may seem like a watered down version of Call of Duty, but it can actually    Graphics: The graphics aren’t the best I’ve seen, but they still look pretty damn good. 9.
    Sound: Nice soundtrack, good voice acting, the games guns sounds are okay not the best, and there’s minor grenade explosions, and other destruction sounds that aren’t realistic. 8.5.
    Gameplay: The game is an fps that may seem like a watered down version of Call of Duty, but it can actually hold its own ground. There’s a great mix up of gameplay from linear shoot em up type missions, to stealth missions, vehicle driving, and on rails helicopter battles. Some guns feel unrealistic, while some are good. It has the typical controls you’d expect from an FPS, it isn’t the greatest fps, but it is still worth a playthrough (sp). The multiplayer is fun but this is where the watered down version kicks in. Supposedly it’s done by DICE yet it doesn’t feel as good as their battlefield series. There aren’t any destructible environments, and it feels like an old days FPS shooter. It is still fun, but there are so many other options out that one may look the other way for Medal of Honor. 8.
    Story: The story is okay, it’s based on real life undercover military that are hidden away watching Taliban activity. You’ll find yourself slowly boring away, but some characters can be memorable but they are easily forgotten. The game tries to create sad moments but never really impacts the player. A lesson may need to be learned from Call of Duty when it comes to impact/controversy. 6.5.
    Lasting Appeal: The games singleplayer is very short, you can beat it in 2 sittings if you went all out. There is multiplayer but it isn’t the best. I can recommend this game but there are better options out there. 7.
    Overall Score: 7.8 out of 10.    … Expand
  62. FCBM
    Dec 31, 2013
    10
    This is I swear to god the best fps game ever. The story is set in Afghanistan. You are either navy seals, or army rangers. Seals are usually doing the stealthy missions, while as a ranger, you fight with dozens more rangers, "nonstealthily."
    The graphics are amazing. Rather than having this vibrant cheerful battleground, you have this bleak, dusty, ultrarealistic landscape. The    This is I swear to god the best fps game ever. The story is set in Afghanistan. You are either navy seals, or army rangers. Seals are usually doing the stealthy missions, while as a ranger, you fight with dozens more rangers, "nonstealthily."
    The graphics are amazing. Rather than having this vibrant cheerful battleground, you have this bleak, dusty, ultrarealistic landscape. The graphics beat battlefield 4 by 3 years. The storyline is short, but it isn't your average boring cod superhero story, it depicts all the small battles that make up the whole. The story is very emotional, and the characters have a lot of depth, compared to cod, and battlefield. And the music is amazing and very professional, rather than the average Beethoven from cod and battlefield. Although there are a couple points where you have to walk to a certain point, and when you go to that point, it doesn't do anything.
    The multiplayer is great too. It is like a whole different game, but it is good. The killstreaks are way more effective, but you can't choose you're own. There is as specific ladder of scorestreaks, each more effective than the last. You can either choose an offensive scorestreak, like a mortar strike, or a cruise missile, or you can choose a defensive scorestreak, which gives you points instantly, and a bonus. The scoring is different too, rather than getting a ****load of points for one kill, you get ten. I prefer this just because it feels more rewarding to get 1000 points for 50 kills rather than 1000 points for only ten kills. Unlike cod, you can jump over whatever rock you feel like, rather than being told where you can jump. This allows for awesome hiding spots and really fun ways to sneak up on your enemy. You have endless sprint, which is unrealistic, but I miss it when I play cod. There is a lack of classes, which I find cool and challenging. The only con is the slight lag when you turn your graphic settings up. 10/10, buy it. But do not get sequel, it messes up storyline, and multiplayer sucks.    … Expand
  63. maor4774
    Jan 22, 2014
    7
    now first if you looking for a badass single-player Campaign than this game is not for you, the Campaign is poor and not very fun, however if you look for good multiplayer well you may found it here....many will not like and even hate this game multiplayer, but if you play you very easly see what the game try to do, a realistic FPS who try to be like cod but failed, but with the realisim inow first if you looking for a badass single-player Campaign than this game is not for you, the Campaign is poor and not very fun, however if you look for good multiplayer well you may found it here....many will not like and even hate this game multiplayer, but if you play you very easly see what the game try to do, a realistic FPS who try to be like cod but failed, but with the realisim i know there are alot of gamers who will love this game, so if you like realistic FPS, and like cod more or less, then you going to love this game.… Expand
  64. mrp11
    Mar 29, 2014
    5
    "Bullets or broken legs" - Mother

    The whole game took me about 5 hours on the hardest difficulty and that is the only sentence I can remind myself after playing it through. The game has kept the level of the game Call of Duty 4 Modern Warfare (2007). With level I mean graphics. No innovation, I would barely even say it has the same engine, but it would be too offensive, because Dice and    "Bullets or broken legs" - Mother

    The whole game took me about 5 hours on the hardest difficulty and that is the only sentence I can remind myself after playing it through. The game has kept the level of the game Call of Duty 4 Modern Warfare (2007). With level I mean graphics. No innovation, I would barely even say it has the same engine, but it would be too offensive, because Dice and Activision have a market fight on sells.

    Once more you have to kill people. Alrighty then. I like shooter games, but people there is no story. You are being dropped somewhere in Afghanistan and have there some operations without any pre-story. It can maitanly be linked to the current Terrorism searching operations... but it was boring. The story was boring. One operation was nice, the quad mission. The others are go there, kill 200 taliban, go somewhere else, let a comrade pick you up so you can play the script further, kill again 200 talibans. Go to spot C, seed a plant of weed, run back to B. Kill again 200 talibans... pretty repetitive.

    Like all games of that kind it has the same problems too. Invincible walls, stupid AI. The snow there looks like an unmoded (without hd textures) Skyrim. You leave no footsteps in the snow... The game is pretty easy. I feeled like I was playing a port from a current console. The game is telling me where to go pushing H, where the enemy hides after I have not found them and of course begging your comrades for bullets. That seems... -> "if the game is too hard for you, please push button f12, DICE will gonna help you".

    That was pretty much critics at all. To speak about some positive aspects the game has an awsome music/sound overlay. I played the game using a 5.1 supporting Headphones and I feeled hilarious! Awsome soundtrack, yummy!

    To sum up:
    - graphic = nothing new since 2007 => 5
    - gameplay = repetitive, boring, no plot => 2
    - sound = hilarious! => 9+

    Total: 5+/10    … Expand
  65. DrClocks
    May 29, 2014
    3
    The good: Decently set up stages, enjoyable feeling of being in the thick of our most recent wars, tribute to our fallen soldiers, fun times flying in helicopters and in night missions.
    The bad: SHORT GAME. Beat it in four hours, only 12 stages. Limited weaponry for normal "running and gunning" missions. Ye olde bad ending. Mediocre plot, basically "kill the Taliban/Al Qaeda/Chechnyans".    The good: Decently set up stages, enjoyable feeling of being in the thick of our most recent wars, tribute to our fallen soldiers, fun times flying in helicopters and in night missions.
    The bad: SHORT GAME. Beat it in four hours, only 12 stages. Limited weaponry for normal "running and gunning" missions. Ye olde bad ending. Mediocre plot, basically "kill the Taliban/Al Qaeda/Chechnyans". Glitches galore, from the ability to cause the game to lock up and prevent progress just by killing enemies too fast, to awful physics, to improper landings and movement. Beat the game basically by M4 sniping everybody in regular missions, no need for other weapons at all, never melee'd aside from a mandatory moment in the game. "Indefinite enemy respawn until you walk up to this boulder and kill this one guy" syndrome.
    The ugly: Character models, movies, and textures. I shouldn't be seeing pixellated grass every five seconds on highest settings, geez.
    The verdict: Not worth the $20 it is now. If you want it, hopefully Humble Bundle'll redo their bundle for EA. Doubt it, though.    … Expand
  66. forfb
    Jun 2, 2018
    6
    That's one big underrated game. The campaign was a pure pleasure. Short, but properly balanced between action and story-telling. The story was surprisingly good. What I expected was yet another FPS game set somewhere in Afghanistan. But wow! Throughout gameplay you play as the U.S. Soldiers that were sent to Afghanistan as a payback shortly after 9/11 terrorist attack on WTC. Idk if IThat's one big underrated game. The campaign was a pure pleasure. Short, but properly balanced between action and story-telling. The story was surprisingly good. What I expected was yet another FPS game set somewhere in Afghanistan. But wow! Throughout gameplay you play as the U.S. Soldiers that were sent to Afghanistan as a payback shortly after 9/11 terrorist attack on WTC. Idk if I understood it correctly, but it bares kind of an anti-war meaning after all, especially the ending, though. It's not a perfect game but it had it's moment, like very emotional final defense of the squad and so on.
    I'm not going any further into the story details as it's something you should experience on your own, not read on the internet. Go and try it, it's cheap and deffinietly worth its current price.

    I also feel like I should say something about multiplayer. It's not full of players but there are some servers that are (mostly) active all day. It was a very bad idea to make a decision that multiplayer and singleplayer mode should be developed by two different companies. Multiplayer - developed by DICE -differs too much from the singleplayer. Naturaly, people who'd buy the game, will finish the campaign first and then move on to the multiplayer. Man, it was hell to get used to different mechanics in shooting, running, crouching, throwing grenades and pretty much everything you was thought previously.
    Even guns sounds were replaced for some reason. Idk why they did it, probably deadline issue.
    Nevertheless, if you finaly get used to what you're not used to after singleplayer it's still meh. Not good, not bad, just average.

    I feel like it's singleplayer that makes the game worth trying. As I said, if you're an FPS games kinda guy and you're looking for something to play,
    Medal of Honor is cheap, go and buy it.    … Expand
  67. SoheilPs4Gamer
    Jun 4, 2020
    10
    Greet game greet story good game play and perfect graphic and sonudtracks is very good
  68. DrawTheLine
    Apr 13, 2019
    9
    In my opinion probably one of the best campaigns ever in fps history. Greatly immersive gameplay that, again, in my opinion is way more enjoyable than any COD campaign by far. Could be longer though :p
  69. gold
    Jan 5, 2019
    9
    CoD почти во всей красе. Сюжет и геймплей прикольный, но не более того. Графика - 7.
    Итог: 9.006/10
  70. Kotofon
    Jun 6, 2020
    7
    Сеттинг новой части, сделанной на основе геймплейных особенностей всех предыдущих, это не Вторая Мировая Война, а события в Афганистане. События игры во многом проливают свет на настоящее положение дел, рассказывают о подлинной войне в Афганистане. Главный герой принимает участие в масштабных и стелс сражениях. Шутер от первого лица Medal of Honor — показывает настоящую войну, а не простуюСеттинг новой части, сделанной на основе геймплейных особенностей всех предыдущих, это не Вторая Мировая Война, а события в Афганистане. События игры во многом проливают свет на настоящее положение дел, рассказывают о подлинной войне в Афганистане. Главный герой принимает участие в масштабных и стелс сражениях. Шутер от первого лица Medal of Honor — показывает настоящую войну, а не простую драму.… Expand
  71. 75978
    Feb 9, 2019
    6
    in General, a good game as the graphics but clumsy gameplay spoils the impression of the game plot: standard
  72. derHausmeister
    Mar 17, 2019
    8
    Einzelspieler Review:

    Die Kampagne hat mir so gut gefallen, dass ich sie in einem Rutsch durchgespielt habe (ca. 5-6 Stunden lang). Das Gameplay ist super und nicht so arcade-lastig. Das Spiel ist gut gealtert und auch heute noch ansehnlich. Die Missionen sind abwechslungsreich, mal mehr Action, ab und zu eine Sniper-Mission. Da das Spiel oft sehr günstig zu haben ist, kann ich es auch    Einzelspieler Review:

    Die Kampagne hat mir so gut gefallen, dass ich sie in einem Rutsch durchgespielt habe (ca. 5-6 Stunden lang). Das Gameplay ist super und nicht so arcade-lastig. Das Spiel ist gut gealtert und auch heute noch ansehnlich. Die Missionen sind abwechslungsreich, mal mehr Action, ab und zu eine Sniper-Mission. Da das Spiel oft sehr günstig zu haben ist, kann ich es auch heute noch empfehlen!    … Expand
  73. Manzanetti
    Aug 10, 2020
    6
    Liked the campaign bit, had some cool moments. The realism is cool, but falls a bit into the generic pile of FPS.
  74. moonlaba
    Jan 17, 2022
    7
    전장의 느낌은 은근 잘 살렸지만 그런 미션마저 몇개없다. 쓸데없는 헬기미션이랑 저격미션같은거만 뺏으면 오히려 수작이 됬을수도......
  75. Genek13
    Nov 15, 2019
    8
    Campaign is very forgettable, but MP is where the game shines :) similar to CoD games :)
  76. Mindaza
    Dec 27, 2019
    10
    Отличная игра про войну. Без лишнего пафоса и всё по-настоящему
  77. r03vg
    Apr 17, 2020
    7
    Игра похожа на прослойку между Call of Duty и Battlefield. Удивила хорошей графикой и приятной стрельбой. Сюжет забудете на следующий же день.
  78. Hellish_Berzerk
    Feb 2, 2020
    9
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I really liked this game. I played it several times, and each time the game touched me with something. From the death of one of the main characters to a fierce battle in the surrounding. Yes, the game had flaws, such as minor bugs, or strange weapon sounds. But for some reason, every time I returned to it at the marathon of passing old games, I did not pay much attention to them. For the most part, I focused on the plot, which tells about the events that took place in Afghanistan during Operation Anaconda, namely the most famous battle on the Takur-Ghar ridge. To summarize - the game is super, but the bumps are making themselves felt, so I can’t give a rating 10/10… Expand
  79. AMBO
    Feb 17, 2020
    8
    08/10......................................................................
  80. dontlike911
    Feb 25, 2020
    6
    ot a CoD beater but definitely close. This game is about realism, not arcade shooting. The SP is action-packed but short, with only 5 hrs of gameplay. You are in the War in Afghanistan, fighting the Taliban forces in actual operations that took place in 2001-2005. Y
  81. shauntmw
    Apr 12, 2020
    7
    I bought and played the EA Origin version of this game.
    I play purely for the single player campaign, since I am not a fan of multiplayer FPS.
    First of all, the game doesn't launch properly via EA Origin app. The updater will fail to update the game, and you have to manually launch the updated from the game installation folder. Once updated, the game will fail to launch via Origin, you    I bought and played the EA Origin version of this game.
    I play purely for the single player campaign, since I am not a fan of multiplayer FPS.

    First of all, the game doesn't launch properly via EA Origin app. The updater will fail to update the game, and you have to manually launch the updated from the game installation folder. Once updated, the game will fail to launch via Origin, you need to launch the game manually via the game installation folder again. Not a big deal, but still pretty annoying.

    There is a significant input-lag for me, almost half a seconds. Running, crouching, even aiming and moving the mouse feels pretty bad. After searching on the Internet and trying everything for a bit, I find that disabling mouse acceleration improves a lot.

    The campaign is short, but feels good and heroic to play. Minor glitches happens here and there, but nothing game breaking. Very nice graphics and music, the dialogues are great, the missions are good.    … Expand
  82. SurujSingha
    May 20, 2020
    6
    I am disappointed with the campaign, it had the potential. The story is uninspiring, the maps of the Afghanistan deserts were poorly detailed. The AI is pathetically dumb and makes the gunplay even more boring. They were like 3 or 4 missions that were actually good. Except that, every missions looks like the same with identical objectives.
  83. SewAwOw
    Aug 9, 2022
    7
    Стандартный боевичок конца 00-начала 10х годов. Пафосный, коридорный, с попыткой в сюжет и драму. На разок по подписке EA Play пойдет.
  84. churros
    Feb 5, 2022
    7
    Pros:
    + graphics aged well
    + weapons controls well
    + balanced difficulty
    + machine guns

    Cons:
    - boring mission design
    - forgettable story and characters
    - too scripted
  85. apokalipto
    Aug 10, 2023
    8
    Very good game. I enjoyed playing this game a lot. I strongly recommend this.
  86. bar0yka
    Nov 11, 2022
    8
    cod ile aynı zevki codun prime döneminde verebilen bir oyundu 2 kere bitirdim çok iyiydi
  87. Gorbunov2004
    Mar 27, 2021
    9
    Хорошая игра жаль что такая короткая, наконец сделали приятную стрельбу можно метко стрелять по головам. Оружия в этой игре мало, если у тебя закончились патроны то напарники дадут тебе ещё магазинов. Но патроны у них есть только для определённого оружия.Хорошая игра жаль что такая короткая, наконец сделали приятную стрельбу можно метко стрелять по головам. Оружия в этой игре мало, если у тебя закончились патроны то напарники дадут тебе ещё магазинов. Но патроны у них есть только для определённого оружия.
  88. RockerKR
    Nov 17, 2020
    7
    Good Game lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
  89. Fallconex
    Dec 17, 2020
    7
    Not bad, not great. First-person shooter Medal of Honor - shows a real war, not a simple drama.
  90. Soheil_0611
    Apr 20, 2021
    8
    greet game greet story good gameplay and perfect graphic and soundtracks are very good
  91. kndr
    May 23, 2021
    3
    Generic and forgettable. Characters are boring, gameplay is bland and textures are bad.
  92. DanichevOff
    Jun 13, 2021
    10
    Реалистичный и драматический шутер, который вмещает в себе и взрывающийся театр боевых действий, и сильный эмоциональный сценарий
  93. superdyzio
    Aug 24, 2021
    9
    I really liked the realism and the fact that you get to play as multiple sides of the same story. I'm mad that single player is so short!
  94. DonldTrump_45Th
    Jan 26, 2023
    7
    Hello, this is a default review because i'm forced to use 75 characters. I'll edit this review in the future talking about the game, don't worry ;)

    My final rate is: 7
  95. The_D4RknesS
    Jun 14, 2022
    10
    this game is good, it's just the physics of the enemies that leaves something to be desired because it's so poorly done that other than that the game is perfect and fun and it has a nice story
  96. haruorjatta
    Sep 10, 2022
    6
    Не смотря на посредственное техническое исполнение и регулярные баги игра оставляет относительно приятные впечатления за счет аркадного геймплея с грамотными попытками в реализм и простой, но в то же время работающей истории.Не смотря на посредственное техническое исполнение и регулярные баги игра оставляет относительно приятные впечатления за счет аркадного геймплея с грамотными попытками в реализм и простой, но в то же время работающей истории.
  97. PenetratorGod
    Sep 1, 2023
    7
    Even if it was not successful compared to the games of the COD Modern Warfare series, it was not a mediocre game. I remember I loved it at the time.
  98. Gusta27
    Dec 22, 2022
    4
    Where to start, terrible combat system, terrible environment, with very poorly made NPCs that look more like robots than soldiers, it's a shame for so many incredible games that were produced by the Medal of Honor saga, from the second mission you lose interest in playing.
  99. Giero
    Jan 3, 2023
    5
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  100. threeoftendie
    Feb 14, 2023
    7
    Ставлю оценку одиночной компании, в мультиплеер не заходил. Однако этого мне достаточно, чтобы утверждать, что в целом здесь оценка игре занижена - как от критиков, так и от игроков. Нет, я все понимаю: "очередной клон "Modern Warfare", гораздо менее масштабный и драйвовый, может, и не стоит наравне с MW2, но не может не зацепить своеобразным реализмом, переносом места действия вСтавлю оценку одиночной компании, в мультиплеер не заходил. Однако этого мне достаточно, чтобы утверждать, что в целом здесь оценка игре занижена - как от критиков, так и от игроков. Нет, я все понимаю: "очередной клон "Modern Warfare", гораздо менее масштабный и драйвовый, может, и не стоит наравне с MW2, но не может не зацепить своеобразным реализмом, переносом места действия в Афганистан, зону реальных боев, и попыткой серьезного рассказа об этой войне с безрадостным концом. В то же время, недостатки действительно дают о себе знать по ходу прохождения, и тем не менее я не могу оценить эту игру ниже.… Expand
Page:

Awards & Rankings

85
#85 Best PC Game of 2010
17
#17 Most Discussed PC Game of 2010
31
#31 Most Shared PC Game of 2010

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
72

Mixed or average reviews - based on 26 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 16 out of 26
  2. Mixed: 9 out of 26
  3. Negative: 1 out of 26
  1. Worth Playing
    Sep 19, 2011
    75
    Overall, Medal of Honor is visually and aurally outstanding, but it needs much more polish on gameplay, scripted events, character/scene transitions and narrative construction before it's ready to really run with the big dogs.
    Read full review
  2. Absolute Games
    Jan 15, 2011
    60
    Medal of Honor doesn't become the current image of Electronic Arts – probably the most "humane" of all videogame corporations. Danger Close Games' debut reminds of a time when EA was a gloomy assembly line churning out soulless yearly sequels and movie tie-ins.
    Read full review
  3. LEVEL (Czech Republic)
    Jan 13, 2011
    70
    Good news: This is not Call of Duty. Bad news: This is not Call of Duty. Interesting environs and fast paced action can't hide more than a few story holes and the overall stupidity of opponents. [Issue#197]
See all critic reviews »