Medal of Honor

 PC
User Score
6.5

Mixed or average reviews- based on 657 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 267 out of 657
  2. Mixed: 257 out of 657
  3. Negative: 133 out of 657
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. OniGioRi
    Sep 7, 2023
    7
    Medal of Honor is a beautiful game. Short but enough to make you experience the real brotherhood and sacrifice for the motherland.
  2. PenetratorGod
    Sep 1, 2023
    7
    Even if it was not successful compared to the games of the COD Modern Warfare series, it was not a mediocre game. I remember I loved it at the time.
  3. apokalipto
    Aug 10, 2023
    8
    Very good game. I enjoyed playing this game a lot. I strongly recommend this.
  4. threeoftendie
    Feb 14, 2023
    7
    Ставлю оценку одиночной компании, в мультиплеер не заходил. Однако этого мне достаточно, чтобы утверждать, что в целом здесь оценка игре занижена - как от критиков, так и от игроков. Нет, я все понимаю: "очередной клон "Modern Warfare", гораздо менее масштабный и драйвовый, может, и не стоит наравне с MW2, но не может не зацепить своеобразным реализмом, переносом места действия вСтавлю оценку одиночной компании, в мультиплеер не заходил. Однако этого мне достаточно, чтобы утверждать, что в целом здесь оценка игре занижена - как от критиков, так и от игроков. Нет, я все понимаю: "очередной клон "Modern Warfare", гораздо менее масштабный и драйвовый, может, и не стоит наравне с MW2, но не может не зацепить своеобразным реализмом, переносом места действия в Афганистан, зону реальных боев, и попыткой серьезного рассказа об этой войне с безрадостным концом. В то же время, недостатки действительно дают о себе знать по ходу прохождения, и тем не менее я не могу оценить эту игру ниже.… Expand
  5. The_D4RknesS
    Jun 14, 2022
    10
    this game is good, it's just the physics of the enemies that leaves something to be desired because it's so poorly done that other than that the game is perfect and fun and it has a nice story
  6. DonldTrump_45Th
    Jan 26, 2023
    7
    Hello, this is a default review because i'm forced to use 75 characters. I'll edit this review in the future talking about the game, don't worry ;)

    My final rate is: 7
  7. Giero
    Jan 3, 2023
    5
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  8. Gusta27
    Dec 22, 2022
    4
    Where to start, terrible combat system, terrible environment, with very poorly made NPCs that look more like robots than soldiers, it's a shame for so many incredible games that were produced by the Medal of Honor saga, from the second mission you lose interest in playing.
  9. bar0yka
    Nov 11, 2022
    8
    cod ile aynı zevki codun prime döneminde verebilen bir oyundu 2 kere bitirdim çok iyiydi
  10. haruorjatta
    Sep 10, 2022
    6
    Не смотря на посредственное техническое исполнение и регулярные баги игра оставляет относительно приятные впечатления за счет аркадного геймплея с грамотными попытками в реализм и простой, но в то же время работающей истории.Не смотря на посредственное техническое исполнение и регулярные баги игра оставляет относительно приятные впечатления за счет аркадного геймплея с грамотными попытками в реализм и простой, но в то же время работающей истории.
  11. SewAwOw
    Aug 9, 2022
    7
    Стандартный боевичок конца 00-начала 10х годов. Пафосный, коридорный, с попыткой в сюжет и драму. На разок по подписке EA Play пойдет.
  12. dimadima423212
    May 3, 2022
    9
    Игра хорошая, наконец-то медаль за отвагу не вторую мировую войну, а про современную войну, где уже что-то новое, и где больше эффектов, есть разрушаемость, прокачка, современная техника, и наконец медаль за отвагу перешла на новый уровень, почему так люди оценили плохо, вроде-бы хорошая игра, может из-за того что не привыкли что медаль за отвагу стала про современную войну, и это хотя быИгра хорошая, наконец-то медаль за отвагу не вторую мировую войну, а про современную войну, где уже что-то новое, и где больше эффектов, есть разрушаемость, прокачка, современная техника, и наконец медаль за отвагу перешла на новый уровень, почему так люди оценили плохо, вроде-бы хорошая игра, может из-за того что не привыкли что медаль за отвагу стала про современную войну, и это хотя бы современный мир чтоб делать такие стили, но стиль нормальный, игру стоит ли брать, ну да, но лучше на xbox 360, потому что там есть достижения, но на playstation 3 поменьше fps, и графика немножко похуже, но есть приятные кнопочки для меня, и когда получаешь достижения, там показывает картинку достижения, но лучше брать на xbox 360, но в steam показывает сколько ты поиграл времени эту игру.
    Вывод, игра хорошая, стоить её покупать на ps3, steam, xbox 360, потому-что игра хорошая, но надо с начало пройти сюжет, а потом можно играть в сетевую игру, хотя наоборот это плюс, но сюжет тяжёлый, противники очень мощные, игра не заслуживает такую низкую оценку, заслуживает повыше, это лучше чем другие части медаль за отвагу!    … Expand
  13. churros
    Feb 5, 2022
    7
    Pros:
    + graphics aged well
    + weapons controls well
    + balanced difficulty
    + machine guns

    Cons:
    - boring mission design
    - forgettable story and characters
    - too scripted
  14. moonlaba
    Jan 17, 2022
    7
    전장의 느낌은 은근 잘 살렸지만 그런 미션마저 몇개없다. 쓸데없는 헬기미션이랑 저격미션같은거만 뺏으면 오히려 수작이 됬을수도......
  15. superdyzio
    Aug 24, 2021
    9
    I really liked the realism and the fact that you get to play as multiple sides of the same story. I'm mad that single player is so short!
  16. DanichevOff
    Jun 13, 2021
    10
    Реалистичный и драматический шутер, который вмещает в себе и взрывающийся театр боевых действий, и сильный эмоциональный сценарий
  17. kndr
    May 23, 2021
    3
    Generic and forgettable. Characters are boring, gameplay is bland and textures are bad.
  18. Soheil_0611
    Apr 20, 2021
    8
    greet game greet story good gameplay and perfect graphic and soundtracks are very good
  19. Gorbunov2004
    Mar 27, 2021
    9
    Хорошая игра жаль что такая короткая, наконец сделали приятную стрельбу можно метко стрелять по головам. Оружия в этой игре мало, если у тебя закончились патроны то напарники дадут тебе ещё магазинов. Но патроны у них есть только для определённого оружия.Хорошая игра жаль что такая короткая, наконец сделали приятную стрельбу можно метко стрелять по головам. Оружия в этой игре мало, если у тебя закончились патроны то напарники дадут тебе ещё магазинов. Но патроны у них есть только для определённого оружия.
  20. Fallconex
    Dec 17, 2020
    7
    Not bad, not great. First-person shooter Medal of Honor - shows a real war, not a simple drama.
  21. RockerKR
    Nov 17, 2020
    7
    Good Game lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
  22. Manzanetti
    Aug 10, 2020
    6
    Liked the campaign bit, had some cool moments. The realism is cool, but falls a bit into the generic pile of FPS.
  23. Kotofon
    Jun 6, 2020
    7
    Сеттинг новой части, сделанной на основе геймплейных особенностей всех предыдущих, это не Вторая Мировая Война, а события в Афганистане. События игры во многом проливают свет на настоящее положение дел, рассказывают о подлинной войне в Афганистане. Главный герой принимает участие в масштабных и стелс сражениях. Шутер от первого лица Medal of Honor — показывает настоящую войну, а не простуюСеттинг новой части, сделанной на основе геймплейных особенностей всех предыдущих, это не Вторая Мировая Война, а события в Афганистане. События игры во многом проливают свет на настоящее положение дел, рассказывают о подлинной войне в Афганистане. Главный герой принимает участие в масштабных и стелс сражениях. Шутер от первого лица Medal of Honor — показывает настоящую войну, а не простую драму.… Expand
  24. SoheilPs4Gamer
    Jun 4, 2020
    10
    Greet game greet story good game play and perfect graphic and sonudtracks is very good
  25. SurujSingha
    May 20, 2020
    6
    I am disappointed with the campaign, it had the potential. The story is uninspiring, the maps of the Afghanistan deserts were poorly detailed. The AI is pathetically dumb and makes the gunplay even more boring. They were like 3 or 4 missions that were actually good. Except that, every missions looks like the same with identical objectives.
  26. r03vg
    Apr 17, 2020
    7
    Игра похожа на прослойку между Call of Duty и Battlefield. Удивила хорошей графикой и приятной стрельбой. Сюжет забудете на следующий же день.
  27. shauntmw
    Apr 12, 2020
    7
    I bought and played the EA Origin version of this game.
    I play purely for the single player campaign, since I am not a fan of multiplayer FPS.
    First of all, the game doesn't launch properly via EA Origin app. The updater will fail to update the game, and you have to manually launch the updated from the game installation folder. Once updated, the game will fail to launch via Origin, you    I bought and played the EA Origin version of this game.
    I play purely for the single player campaign, since I am not a fan of multiplayer FPS.

    First of all, the game doesn't launch properly via EA Origin app. The updater will fail to update the game, and you have to manually launch the updated from the game installation folder. Once updated, the game will fail to launch via Origin, you need to launch the game manually via the game installation folder again. Not a big deal, but still pretty annoying.

    There is a significant input-lag for me, almost half a seconds. Running, crouching, even aiming and moving the mouse feels pretty bad. After searching on the Internet and trying everything for a bit, I find that disabling mouse acceleration improves a lot.

    The campaign is short, but feels good and heroic to play. Minor glitches happens here and there, but nothing game breaking. Very nice graphics and music, the dialogues are great, the missions are good.    … Expand
  28. dontlike911
    Feb 25, 2020
    6
    ot a CoD beater but definitely close. This game is about realism, not arcade shooting. The SP is action-packed but short, with only 5 hrs of gameplay. You are in the War in Afghanistan, fighting the Taliban forces in actual operations that took place in 2001-2005. Y
  29. AMBO
    Feb 17, 2020
    8
    08/10......................................................................
  30. Hellish_Berzerk
    Feb 2, 2020
    9
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I really liked this game. I played it several times, and each time the game touched me with something. From the death of one of the main characters to a fierce battle in the surrounding. Yes, the game had flaws, such as minor bugs, or strange weapon sounds. But for some reason, every time I returned to it at the marathon of passing old games, I did not pay much attention to them. For the most part, I focused on the plot, which tells about the events that took place in Afghanistan during Operation Anaconda, namely the most famous battle on the Takur-Ghar ridge. To summarize - the game is super, but the bumps are making themselves felt, so I can’t give a rating 10/10… Expand
  31. Mindaza
    Dec 27, 2019
    10
    Отличная игра про войну. Без лишнего пафоса и всё по-настоящему
  32. Genek13
    Nov 15, 2019
    8
    Campaign is very forgettable, but MP is where the game shines :) similar to CoD games :)
  33. DrawTheLine
    Apr 13, 2019
    9
    In my opinion probably one of the best campaigns ever in fps history. Greatly immersive gameplay that, again, in my opinion is way more enjoyable than any COD campaign by far. Could be longer though :p
  34. derHausmeister
    Mar 17, 2019
    8
    Einzelspieler Review:

    Die Kampagne hat mir so gut gefallen, dass ich sie in einem Rutsch durchgespielt habe (ca. 5-6 Stunden lang). Das Gameplay ist super und nicht so arcade-lastig. Das Spiel ist gut gealtert und auch heute noch ansehnlich. Die Missionen sind abwechslungsreich, mal mehr Action, ab und zu eine Sniper-Mission. Da das Spiel oft sehr günstig zu haben ist, kann ich es auch    Einzelspieler Review:

    Die Kampagne hat mir so gut gefallen, dass ich sie in einem Rutsch durchgespielt habe (ca. 5-6 Stunden lang). Das Gameplay ist super und nicht so arcade-lastig. Das Spiel ist gut gealtert und auch heute noch ansehnlich. Die Missionen sind abwechslungsreich, mal mehr Action, ab und zu eine Sniper-Mission. Da das Spiel oft sehr günstig zu haben ist, kann ich es auch heute noch empfehlen!    … Expand
  35. playking
    Mar 5, 2019
    9
    i don't see why people doesn't like this game it is perfect one of the best games ever i wish EA continue in this series it is a looooooot better thanbattlefield
  36. 75978
    Feb 9, 2019
    6
    in General, a good game as the graphics but clumsy gameplay spoils the impression of the game plot: standard
  37. gold
    Jan 5, 2019
    9
    CoD почти во всей красе. Сюжет и геймплей прикольный, но не более того. Графика - 7.
    Итог: 9.006/10
  38. forfb
    Jun 2, 2018
    6
    That's one big underrated game. The campaign was a pure pleasure. Short, but properly balanced between action and story-telling. The story was surprisingly good. What I expected was yet another FPS game set somewhere in Afghanistan. But wow! Throughout gameplay you play as the U.S. Soldiers that were sent to Afghanistan as a payback shortly after 9/11 terrorist attack on WTC. Idk if IThat's one big underrated game. The campaign was a pure pleasure. Short, but properly balanced between action and story-telling. The story was surprisingly good. What I expected was yet another FPS game set somewhere in Afghanistan. But wow! Throughout gameplay you play as the U.S. Soldiers that were sent to Afghanistan as a payback shortly after 9/11 terrorist attack on WTC. Idk if I understood it correctly, but it bares kind of an anti-war meaning after all, especially the ending, though. It's not a perfect game but it had it's moment, like very emotional final defense of the squad and so on.
    I'm not going any further into the story details as it's something you should experience on your own, not read on the internet. Go and try it, it's cheap and deffinietly worth its current price.

    I also feel like I should say something about multiplayer. It's not full of players but there are some servers that are (mostly) active all day. It was a very bad idea to make a decision that multiplayer and singleplayer mode should be developed by two different companies. Multiplayer - developed by DICE -differs too much from the singleplayer. Naturaly, people who'd buy the game, will finish the campaign first and then move on to the multiplayer. Man, it was hell to get used to different mechanics in shooting, running, crouching, throwing grenades and pretty much everything you was thought previously.
    Even guns sounds were replaced for some reason. Idk why they did it, probably deadline issue.
    Nevertheless, if you finaly get used to what you're not used to after singleplayer it's still meh. Not good, not bad, just average.

    I feel like it's singleplayer that makes the game worth trying. As I said, if you're an FPS games kinda guy and you're looking for something to play,
    Medal of Honor is cheap, go and buy it.    … Expand
  39. ruvinisimus
    Nov 2, 2017
    4
    Крайзис лучше, там было ощущения что я иду куда хочу, а тут я должен идти по "рельсам" и по контрольным точкам, это скучно/
  40. azgoodaz
    Mar 9, 2017
    5
    Does Medal of Honor (2010) still hold up?

    I didn’t even finish the game. The game didn’t let me go past the 3rd to last mission. I keep getting put into a place where to defend a position and yet I hold it for 10 minutes and nothing happens. I tried restarting the checkpoint and that doesn’t work. Other than that, the audio/dialogue is great and for being a 2010 game, the game    Does Medal of Honor (2010) still hold up?

    I didn’t even finish the game. The game didn’t let me go past the 3rd to last mission. I keep getting put into a place where to defend a position and yet I hold it for 10 minutes and nothing happens. I tried restarting the checkpoint and that doesn’t work.

    Other than that, the audio/dialogue is great and for being a 2010 game, the game graphics of destruction, gun sounds and small ambient sounds make the game enjoyable. Truly the only good thing about this game is the hell fighter bomb run and ATV part. The AIM sensitivity and unoptimized screen tearing is what makes the game sometimes unplayable.

    What are flaws? Lowering AIM sensitivity does nothing (it’s really fast when you move the mouse). If you try to launch the game via Origin, you will get fail launch message that states “General protection fault!” error (which they still haven’t fixed) there is no workaround this if you launch it via Origin.

    You will have to play the game without Origin (by putting the game on your desktop, read down below for the steps) if you want to play the campaign. I was playing on 1920x1080 and I sensed the game was causing screen tearing during gameplay and it will sometimes do a millisecond freeze. Running/sprinting seems slow and cutscenes seem unfinished. Plus 0 achievements for PC users, only the consoles got this.

    Want to play the campaign but you can’t because of the error? Go to the Drive where you installed | MoH > Origin Games > Medal of Honor > Binaries > Open “moh” file (right click and press ‘send to desktop’).

    Note: In the same binarie folder, find a file named “MoHUpdater” and run that as a Admin so that you can apply the patch. If not, you will not be able to play.    … Expand
  41. muzmuz
    Nov 5, 2016
    6
    Talk about incomprehensible story, awkward controls and animations, unstable event triggers, confusing objectives, seemingly limitless enemies, what else? Medal of Honor 2010 failed to blow me away. Nonetheless, it's somehow fun 'til it lasted.
  42. shafzxx
    Oct 29, 2016
    9
    I only played single player which was very good. I'd recommend it a single player gamer. I played it when it was out but writing the review now :p..
  43. lhmtgame
    Aug 18, 2016
    4
    The game is ugly but using a lot of PC system resource and this is the worst FPS game ever!
    Using GTX960 and new 2015 components to run the game, the Frame rate always under 70FPS (1080p) with the choppy and lagging. I can get more than 70FPS with Rise of Tomb Raider.
    I've ever played MoH series before. But when I tried to know the gameplay and the content, I am so disappointed on it.
  44. Mahdiar
    Jul 6, 2016
    7
    Gameplay : 7
    Graphics : 8
    Story : 7
    Sound : 8
    **********************************************************************************
    Overall : 7
  45. Predatorium
    Jul 5, 2016
    10
    Epic multiplayer fun! Such a small community now but it's going strong. The attraction to this game that a few people seem to understand is the absence of crazy gadgets, perks and unbalanced weapons. It's even gameplay for both teams and it's all up to skill. It has a very gritty and realistic feel to it. The weapons pack a heavy punch and they are lethal. The frostbite engine and Dice'sEpic multiplayer fun! Such a small community now but it's going strong. The attraction to this game that a few people seem to understand is the absence of crazy gadgets, perks and unbalanced weapons. It's even gameplay for both teams and it's all up to skill. It has a very gritty and realistic feel to it. The weapons pack a heavy punch and they are lethal. The frostbite engine and Dice's legendary sound design mixes the combat into something call of duty will never achieve. The sound of the weapons, explosions and the very mature language of the soldiers make this game feel like it's for older players. The 13 year olds have long ago moved on to their akimbo sprint jump 360 no scope gameplay in other games or simply matured and come back to this awesome little community of hardcore Navy SEALs going at it like real men of war. So grab your M4 and join the fight.… Expand
  46. crabman323
    Jan 3, 2016
    10
    I dont understand why scores are so low. This game is actually one of the greatest fps ever. The battle sense is perfect, graphics cool . frostbite engine is flawless , team is awesome . preacher, mother, dusty, voodoo , rabbit exc. Buy and play it.
  47. jelikey
    Sep 10, 2015
    8
    The game is anything but CoD in the singleplayer. That's probably it's biggest issue. Nothing too over-the-top is happening, but the attention to detail is mind-boggling once you look into it. The story took me a good 8 hours to complete, on Hard difficulty (anything lower is just for content tourists, if you ask me), and it was indeed impressive.
  48. ogower
    Aug 13, 2015
    5
    Fun enough in its own way but nothing like the triumph that was the original and nothing like it could be given that this is over a decade later. My main issue is that this is the dictionary definition of linear, where deviating even a fraction from the often dull script set out leads to instant death, reflecting lazy design.
  49. sft
    Jul 12, 2015
    7
    An honorable effort

    I only own this game because it came as part of a bundle, and it's not something I would normally play (as a rule I prefer to battle zombies, mutants, and aliens). I was, however, pleasantly surprised by MEDAL OF HONOR. It's a good solid shooter with nice graphics and a realistic atmosphere. The combat is satisfying and reasonably challenging, and it doesn't hold the    An honorable effort

    I only own this game because it came as part of a bundle, and it's not something I would normally play (as a rule I prefer to battle zombies, mutants, and aliens). I was, however, pleasantly surprised by MEDAL OF HONOR. It's a good solid shooter with nice graphics and a realistic atmosphere. The combat is satisfying and reasonably challenging, and it doesn't hold the players hand as much as some games. The single player campaign is, however, very short, at around 6 hours of play, but as I got it pretty much for free I can't complain about that. I can't comment on the multiplayer mode because I haven't played it but the single player part is fun just as long as you don't expect too many hours gameplay from it.    … Expand
  50. Onrush
    May 29, 2015
    7
    The game delivered. Had massive fun with it in my younger days. It filled its own niche and was a relaxing break from the cod franchise. Good times, good times.
  51. ChaosHydrA
    Mar 28, 2015
    3
    One of the absolute worst FPS games i have ever played on PC. Disjointed story that switches between groups makes you never feel for the character or the one you control. Its a great example of how far the FPS genre has moved while this game seems stuck in the era the first Medal of Honor Allied Assault was released in. Todays war fps games might still have too many cliches and the sameOne of the absolute worst FPS games i have ever played on PC. Disjointed story that switches between groups makes you never feel for the character or the one you control. Its a great example of how far the FPS genre has moved while this game seems stuck in the era the first Medal of Honor Allied Assault was released in. Todays war fps games might still have too many cliches and the same gameplay mechanics but most of the best ones make up for it in other departments like gameplay variation and extremely satisfying weapon/gun play mechanics.

    Medal of Honor however doesnt bring anything to the table, from a boring amount of weapons in a abysmal short 5 hour singleplayer campaign to the same type of missions throughout where you keep assaulting forward against fodder enemies and plow them down easily to missions where youre being dictated by the friendly npcs to constantly follow evens that might aswell have been quicktime events.

    The PC version is also suffering from consolitus which means you will be having a magnifying glass FOV at "55" thats bound to cause motion sickness for most me included, its something thats only changeable by searching for a third party program for the single player campaign.

    The visuals arent too bad but the early night missions in the city & villages definitely look more outdated than some of the later missions. The only positive i can say about this game is that the audio & mic communication dialogue is pretty good between the npc's, it does a decent job at making you feel youre in a special team or warzone.

    Theres no reason to replay this game, the single player is a flat experience thats over too quick and the weapons dont have a feel of "oomph" like the better FPS games in its release day or the years around it.

    Graphics: 7.0/10
    Sound: 8.0/10
    Gameplay: 6.0/10
    Replay Value: 3.5/10

    Overall: 5.5/10    … Expand
  52. art4321
    Oct 18, 2014
    1
    one of the worst games i ever played **** this game **** EA stop ruining old and good games .
  53. Honestcritic19
    Sep 16, 2014
    4
    A chore to play through and one of the worst games I've played. The story is forgettable, the characters boring and unlikeable and the gameplay is just mediocre at best. If you want a good military shooter get one of the older cods or one of the battlefields.
  54. DGDrocks7
    Aug 23, 2014
    7
    This game is not as bad as critics say. It's better than I thought it would be. The singleplayer story isn't full of twists and turns, it's more like a tribute to US and NATO troops. Keep it mind as you play the story, many of what you see is happening right now in Afghanistan, especially when you switch to play as a Ranger (most of the time you play as a Navy SEAL). You could feel asThis game is not as bad as critics say. It's better than I thought it would be. The singleplayer story isn't full of twists and turns, it's more like a tribute to US and NATO troops. Keep it mind as you play the story, many of what you see is happening right now in Afghanistan, especially when you switch to play as a Ranger (most of the time you play as a Navy SEAL). You could feel as though you were there. For that, the singleplayer was great. My gripe about it is that it can be finished in 6 hours. And I was playing on the hardest difficulty. Was the game that easy, or is it that I'm good at first-person shooters? The multiplayer, well, that's a different story. I don't know how it has been in the past, but right now, I don't like it. You frequently get spawn-killed and everyone seems to spam grenade and rocket launchers. Some say, it's a combination of Call of Duty and Battlefield. From what I played, I still haven't decided if that's a good or bad thing.

    In the end, where CoD and Battlefield excels in multiplayer, MoH excels in singleplayer. Having been a fan of MoH since 2002, I don't think MoH was meant for MP. Back when the game first came out, I would definitely recommend a rental for the singleplayer. Now that the game is cheap, it's worth buying, so you can check the multiplayer and judge for yourself, but, as I've said, MoH was always a SP game. One day, I'll check on MoH:Warfighter, and see how that game was so bad, EA is putting the series on hold.    … Expand
  55. Kazuma92
    Jul 31, 2014
    9
    My Favorite Military Arcade shooter. One big diamond! (Lower the sound a little bit, and hear the music in the game.) Its a little short, but its intense, dramatic (on hard difficulty of course).
  56. Neddy
    Jul 2, 2014
    6
    Medal of Honour Airbourne shook my heart, and I cried a little at the end. This Medal of Honor, yes I was emotional a little at the end. You feel, 'Oh no, do the armed forces and the honest Afganistan folk have to go through this'.

    It had the odd error and unclear direction: An objective did not trigger in one place for me, and was stuck facing infinite foes until I run out of ammo.    Medal of Honour Airbourne shook my heart, and I cried a little at the end. This Medal of Honor, yes I was emotional a little at the end. You feel, 'Oh no, do the armed forces and the honest Afganistan folk have to go through this'.

    It had the odd error and unclear direction:

    An objective did not trigger in one place for me, and was stuck facing infinite foes until I run out of ammo. Ah maybe it was me, I'll reload the checkpoint. Same again. Gone through 500 rounds in a rifle that fires single shots, emptied my automatic rifle, and using pistol (that has infinite ammo.) Usually you press F next to a team-mate to get ammo, but in this scenario, they say you have plenty. Even though I am out.

    Anyway I restarted the mission and I was OK. It played out that time as it should.

    Helicopter work. Where in the controls does it say how to fire Hellfire missiles. IT DOESN'T. I had to google for it, after repeating stuff over and over. Next time I noticed there was a quick message flashed up on the screen with instruction how to use. I didn't see it before because I was fighting. Plus I was too busy concentrating on the ENDLESS CHATTER OVER THE RADIO.

    The squelshy squaly endless rubbish banging on over the radio. It talks to you through about 2/5 of the game.

    The graphics and scenery are awesome in places. It opens nicely, and the closing scenes in the mountains and snow are beautiful.    … Expand
  57. drivewa-y
    Jun 13, 2014
    9
    Apesar do jogo ser de 2010, é um ótimo jogo para a época.
    Gráficos não são das melhores qualidade mas a história que o jogo aborda é íncrivel, a única coisa ruim do jogo é que ele é curto não há muitas histórias no caminho.
  58. DrClocks
    May 29, 2014
    3
    The good: Decently set up stages, enjoyable feeling of being in the thick of our most recent wars, tribute to our fallen soldiers, fun times flying in helicopters and in night missions.
    The bad: SHORT GAME. Beat it in four hours, only 12 stages. Limited weaponry for normal "running and gunning" missions. Ye olde bad ending. Mediocre plot, basically "kill the Taliban/Al Qaeda/Chechnyans".    The good: Decently set up stages, enjoyable feeling of being in the thick of our most recent wars, tribute to our fallen soldiers, fun times flying in helicopters and in night missions.
    The bad: SHORT GAME. Beat it in four hours, only 12 stages. Limited weaponry for normal "running and gunning" missions. Ye olde bad ending. Mediocre plot, basically "kill the Taliban/Al Qaeda/Chechnyans". Glitches galore, from the ability to cause the game to lock up and prevent progress just by killing enemies too fast, to awful physics, to improper landings and movement. Beat the game basically by M4 sniping everybody in regular missions, no need for other weapons at all, never melee'd aside from a mandatory moment in the game. "Indefinite enemy respawn until you walk up to this boulder and kill this one guy" syndrome.
    The ugly: Character models, movies, and textures. I shouldn't be seeing pixellated grass every five seconds on highest settings, geez.
    The verdict: Not worth the $20 it is now. If you want it, hopefully Humble Bundle'll redo their bundle for EA. Doubt it, though.    … Expand
  59. mrp11
    Mar 29, 2014
    5
    "Bullets or broken legs" - Mother

    The whole game took me about 5 hours on the hardest difficulty and that is the only sentence I can remind myself after playing it through. The game has kept the level of the game Call of Duty 4 Modern Warfare (2007). With level I mean graphics. No innovation, I would barely even say it has the same engine, but it would be too offensive, because Dice and    "Bullets or broken legs" - Mother

    The whole game took me about 5 hours on the hardest difficulty and that is the only sentence I can remind myself after playing it through. The game has kept the level of the game Call of Duty 4 Modern Warfare (2007). With level I mean graphics. No innovation, I would barely even say it has the same engine, but it would be too offensive, because Dice and Activision have a market fight on sells.

    Once more you have to kill people. Alrighty then. I like shooter games, but people there is no story. You are being dropped somewhere in Afghanistan and have there some operations without any pre-story. It can maitanly be linked to the current Terrorism searching operations... but it was boring. The story was boring. One operation was nice, the quad mission. The others are go there, kill 200 taliban, go somewhere else, let a comrade pick you up so you can play the script further, kill again 200 talibans. Go to spot C, seed a plant of weed, run back to B. Kill again 200 talibans... pretty repetitive.

    Like all games of that kind it has the same problems too. Invincible walls, stupid AI. The snow there looks like an unmoded (without hd textures) Skyrim. You leave no footsteps in the snow... The game is pretty easy. I feeled like I was playing a port from a current console. The game is telling me where to go pushing H, where the enemy hides after I have not found them and of course begging your comrades for bullets. That seems... -> "if the game is too hard for you, please push button f12, DICE will gonna help you".

    That was pretty much critics at all. To speak about some positive aspects the game has an awsome music/sound overlay. I played the game using a 5.1 supporting Headphones and I feeled hilarious! Awsome soundtrack, yummy!

    To sum up:
    - graphic = nothing new since 2007 => 5
    - gameplay = repetitive, boring, no plot => 2
    - sound = hilarious! => 9+

    Total: 5+/10    … Expand
  60. cambria
    Jan 25, 2014
    3
    5-hour campaign (on hardest first time through). Less than 200 players online servers. Hackers top charts. Don't waste your time or money this game was apparently dead years ago. There is nothing 'realism' about this game's multiplayer mode, since anyone who's perked+ranked up can run through a clip of AK47 shots to stab you in the face. Perks systems should be destroyed, stupid AAA5-hour campaign (on hardest first time through). Less than 200 players online servers. Hackers top charts. Don't waste your time or money this game was apparently dead years ago. There is nothing 'realism' about this game's multiplayer mode, since anyone who's perked+ranked up can run through a clip of AK47 shots to stab you in the face. Perks systems should be destroyed, stupid AAA titles. Get it for $3 or less, if you are really itching for a bland campaign.… Expand
  61. maor4774
    Jan 22, 2014
    7
    now first if you looking for a badass single-player Campaign than this game is not for you, the Campaign is poor and not very fun, however if you look for good multiplayer well you may found it here....many will not like and even hate this game multiplayer, but if you play you very easly see what the game try to do, a realistic FPS who try to be like cod but failed, but with the realisim inow first if you looking for a badass single-player Campaign than this game is not for you, the Campaign is poor and not very fun, however if you look for good multiplayer well you may found it here....many will not like and even hate this game multiplayer, but if you play you very easly see what the game try to do, a realistic FPS who try to be like cod but failed, but with the realisim i know there are alot of gamers who will love this game, so if you like realistic FPS, and like cod more or less, then you going to love this game.… Expand
  62. FCBM
    Dec 31, 2013
    10
    This is I swear to god the best fps game ever. The story is set in Afghanistan. You are either navy seals, or army rangers. Seals are usually doing the stealthy missions, while as a ranger, you fight with dozens more rangers, "nonstealthily."
    The graphics are amazing. Rather than having this vibrant cheerful battleground, you have this bleak, dusty, ultrarealistic landscape. The    This is I swear to god the best fps game ever. The story is set in Afghanistan. You are either navy seals, or army rangers. Seals are usually doing the stealthy missions, while as a ranger, you fight with dozens more rangers, "nonstealthily."
    The graphics are amazing. Rather than having this vibrant cheerful battleground, you have this bleak, dusty, ultrarealistic landscape. The graphics beat battlefield 4 by 3 years. The storyline is short, but it isn't your average boring cod superhero story, it depicts all the small battles that make up the whole. The story is very emotional, and the characters have a lot of depth, compared to cod, and battlefield. And the music is amazing and very professional, rather than the average Beethoven from cod and battlefield. Although there are a couple points where you have to walk to a certain point, and when you go to that point, it doesn't do anything.
    The multiplayer is great too. It is like a whole different game, but it is good. The killstreaks are way more effective, but you can't choose you're own. There is as specific ladder of scorestreaks, each more effective than the last. You can either choose an offensive scorestreak, like a mortar strike, or a cruise missile, or you can choose a defensive scorestreak, which gives you points instantly, and a bonus. The scoring is different too, rather than getting a ****load of points for one kill, you get ten. I prefer this just because it feels more rewarding to get 1000 points for 50 kills rather than 1000 points for only ten kills. Unlike cod, you can jump over whatever rock you feel like, rather than being told where you can jump. This allows for awesome hiding spots and really fun ways to sneak up on your enemy. You have endless sprint, which is unrealistic, but I miss it when I play cod. There is a lack of classes, which I find cool and challenging. The only con is the slight lag when you turn your graphic settings up. 10/10, buy it. But do not get sequel, it messes up storyline, and multiplayer sucks.    … Expand
  63. huss2215
    Nov 14, 2013
    7
    Graphics: The graphics aren’t the best I’ve seen, but they still look pretty damn good. 9.
    Sound: Nice soundtrack, good voice acting, the games guns sounds are okay not the best, and there’s minor grenade explosions, and other destruction sounds that aren’t realistic. 8.5.
    Gameplay: The game is an fps that may seem like a watered down version of Call of Duty, but it can actually    Graphics: The graphics aren’t the best I’ve seen, but they still look pretty damn good. 9.
    Sound: Nice soundtrack, good voice acting, the games guns sounds are okay not the best, and there’s minor grenade explosions, and other destruction sounds that aren’t realistic. 8.5.
    Gameplay: The game is an fps that may seem like a watered down version of Call of Duty, but it can actually hold its own ground. There’s a great mix up of gameplay from linear shoot em up type missions, to stealth missions, vehicle driving, and on rails helicopter battles. Some guns feel unrealistic, while some are good. It has the typical controls you’d expect from an FPS, it isn’t the greatest fps, but it is still worth a playthrough (sp). The multiplayer is fun but this is where the watered down version kicks in. Supposedly it’s done by DICE yet it doesn’t feel as good as their battlefield series. There aren’t any destructible environments, and it feels like an old days FPS shooter. It is still fun, but there are so many other options out that one may look the other way for Medal of Honor. 8.
    Story: The story is okay, it’s based on real life undercover military that are hidden away watching Taliban activity. You’ll find yourself slowly boring away, but some characters can be memorable but they are easily forgotten. The game tries to create sad moments but never really impacts the player. A lesson may need to be learned from Call of Duty when it comes to impact/controversy. 6.5.
    Lasting Appeal: The games singleplayer is very short, you can beat it in 2 sittings if you went all out. There is multiplayer but it isn’t the best. I can recommend this game but there are better options out there. 7.
    Overall Score: 7.8 out of 10.    … Expand
  64. Keychain
    Nov 1, 2013
    8
    Medal of Honor from a gameplay perspective, is quite generic. You take cover, you shoot stuff with the ironsights on, take cover in order to regenerate your health. This has caused a lot of criticism from people. But if you look underneath that exterior of a generic game you may just find something much more worth your while.

    As a lot of people may or may not know, the events in this    Medal of Honor from a gameplay perspective, is quite generic. You take cover, you shoot stuff with the ironsights on, take cover in order to regenerate your health. This has caused a lot of criticism from people. But if you look underneath that exterior of a generic game you may just find something much more worth your while.

    As a lot of people may or may not know, the events in this game are based on real-life events. This includes the characters, as they maintain their actual military codenames that they had. When you play this game and realize that this is based on something that happened in real life, specific events and scenarios that take place during the game, especially at the end, it just wrenches you right in the heart. It's a story worth listening to, and makes the gameplay much more tolerable when you engage yourself with the story.

    Though you'd probably be better off waiting for a sale, this game is by far worth picking up. It has a story to tell, it has a campaign with constantly changing events that keeps your interest peeked, it's worth checking out. I highly recommend it.    … Expand
  65. Savedbyfaith
    Oct 31, 2013
    7
    I encourage anyone reading these reviews not to be detoured from this game. There are a lot of COD fanyboys out there but if you are like me and enjoy a variety of FPS games then check this one out. Saying that though i have to suggest not to pay over 5 dollars because of how short it is and the lack of character development. That aside the graphics are decent even by today's standards theI encourage anyone reading these reviews not to be detoured from this game. There are a lot of COD fanyboys out there but if you are like me and enjoy a variety of FPS games then check this one out. Saying that though i have to suggest not to pay over 5 dollars because of how short it is and the lack of character development. That aside the graphics are decent even by today's standards the shooting mechanics are good and the sound design is great. This game goes for realism in a respectful way for our armed forces (they even pay homage to them at the end) the if you are a more mature person you will get the story and will feel for the characters.… Expand
  66. kamikung
    Oct 12, 2013
    6
    useless AI but good story. enjoy if u wanna look at the story. it can be better if them make a good AI NOTTTT!! useless skill.
    -im boring when shoot them all and problum bug sometime.
  67. sant_antonio_ro
    Sep 30, 2013
    8
    Personally, i think MoH is a really fun game. You shoot a lot, in a intelligent way. You use a lot the zoom. You drive a quad, you are in an helicopter and shoot rockets. I mean, what do you want from a wargame? I like the levels and the miossions too. The siege, ehan you are Adams, is a hell!
    Maybe It is not too hard. I play it at hard and I rarely die. I don't know how the multiplayer    Personally, i think MoH is a really fun game. You shoot a lot, in a intelligent way. You use a lot the zoom. You drive a quad, you are in an helicopter and shoot rockets. I mean, what do you want from a wargame? I like the levels and the miossions too. The siege, ehan you are Adams, is a hell!
    Maybe It is not too hard. I play it at hard and I rarely die. I don't know how the multiplayer is, but the single one, at hard mode, is a must play. ow oyu can find it also at low price! A must play-must buy! For me, an 8.    … Expand
  68. bullett
    Sep 24, 2013
    4
    It's too easy, it's too short (sub 5 hours for a mediocre player like me) and it's agonisingly linear.
    There is very little story or any emotional investment in the characters as they chop and change so often. It holds your hand for most of the time and then misses out critical information (like use 4 to target the mortars in the gunfighter mission). There are invisible walls everywhere    It's too easy, it's too short (sub 5 hours for a mediocre player like me) and it's agonisingly linear.
    There is very little story or any emotional investment in the characters as they chop and change so often. It holds your hand for most of the time and then misses out critical information (like use 4 to target the mortars in the gunfighter mission). There are invisible walls everywhere and the AI on both sides is very stupid glitching on scenery and failing to trigger the next section in some cases.
    On the upside it looks very nice, the voice acting is excellent as is the sound work. I liked the few bits of variety we did get (helicopters, sniper sections) but these were very limited compared to the corridor shooter of the rest of the game.
    I've not tried multiplayer but frankly I can't really be bothered as I already have CoD and CS available as military shooters.
    If you are looking for a great shooter with a story look elsewhere. If you want a few hours mindless blasting and can pick this up cheap then give it a go.    … Expand
  69. JimGee
    Sep 21, 2013
    4
    This game is probably best described as one of those big, dumb action movies that make no sense but are so fun to watch. There's basically nothing else going for this game, though. It's literally a note-for-note copy of Call of Duty, and it's not subtle about it either. The game is also criminally short at four hours; I completed it at 3 hours after I bought and installed it.

    Oh well.    This game is probably best described as one of those big, dumb action movies that make no sense but are so fun to watch. There's basically nothing else going for this game, though. It's literally a note-for-note copy of Call of Duty, and it's not subtle about it either. The game is also criminally short at four hours; I completed it at 3 hours after I bought and installed it.

    Oh well. It was worth the five bucks. If you happen to catch it on sale, pick it up. It's not bad, it's just below average.    … Expand
  70. DeathtoSpongify
    Sep 20, 2013
    8
    Although EA didn't manage to beat out the CoD experience with this game, they did provide a solid shooter experience, though it may be more ephemeral than they would have liked. This doesn't really add anything new to the shooter scene, and although it's great for fluid mechanics, good graphics and a constant adrenaline rush, it is in the end forgettable. In another place and time, it mayAlthough EA didn't manage to beat out the CoD experience with this game, they did provide a solid shooter experience, though it may be more ephemeral than they would have liked. This doesn't really add anything new to the shooter scene, and although it's great for fluid mechanics, good graphics and a constant adrenaline rush, it is in the end forgettable. In another place and time, it may be considered groundbreaking, but in the end Medal of Honor feels an awful lot like another shooter following the crowd. The game is definitely more realistic than the CoD franchise, with obvious pains taken to make the characters and story believable. Unfortunately, there isn't enough story to give the player a sentimental attachment, and that is a major shortcoming. All this granted, Medal of Honor is still a great shooter.… Expand
  71. csabber
    Sep 14, 2013
    5
    It was supposed to be the game that would break Activision's CoD empire, it was supposed to be the game that would reestablish the once great Meda of Honor name. Now, it's a game that will no-one remember and the game that fell short in every aspect it could have.

    The story of MoH itself is uninteresting, undercooked and short. The game can be finished in a mere 5 hours on normal    It was supposed to be the game that would break Activision's CoD empire, it was supposed to be the game that would reestablish the once great Meda of Honor name. Now, it's a game that will no-one remember and the game that fell short in every aspect it could have.

    The story of MoH itself is uninteresting, undercooked and short. The game can be finished in a mere 5 hours on normal settings, without any, and I mean ANY replay value. There aren't any collectibles, multiple paths or story elements that would encourage the player to start the game all over again. Once you have finished it semi-frustrated there is no going back to it. Frustration is a concept that will many of us have to face in MoH. The super-linear nature of the discourages any way of alternate pathfinding. To put it simple, if you don't do what the game says you to do, you're dead. Don't try to be a hero, as you always have to follow instructions to survive. If you are told to hold position, don't try to peek above the wall, because you are getting shot. If you are told to run or retreat don't try to stay and hold off the enemy as they will kill you...sometimes even behind cover.

    Not is all bad about the game however. Two things stand out the most. The graphics are beautiful even on medium settings. Water, rocks, buildings and shadows look astonishing. The other thing where you have to give credit to the creators is trying to maintain authenticity. Places, soldiers, the way they talk to each other, situations all feel real to a person who is inexperienced in war situations. The game itself takes place in Afghanistan and it's plot is loosely based on the Operation Anaconda where US soldiers tried to destroy Taliban forces back in '02.

    I can honestly say that I haven't seen a game that would want YOU to rush through it's single player mode. This game does. For one thing its ultra short. Experienced player can finish it in 4 to 5 hours easily, and checkpoints are so frequent that even if you happen to die, you won't be set back for more than 2 minutes of your progress. Literally, a level starts with an in-game cinematic and a shepherd is taken down silently by your fellow soldier, and boom checkpoint. Sometimes it feels like the game throws you a CP every time you reload you weapon. The level design is also horrible, excluding the first few stages, on all of the levels there is 1 hard point where you are so overwhelmed that you will die 3-10 times in 5 minutes. Up until that point and even after that there is little to no resistance. To put it gently, it's unbalanced.

    When you get frustrated (and you'll get) by the SP you can try the Tier1 mode, which is unlocked once you've completed the SP on any difficulty. Basically, Tier1 is the same as the SP just with some gameplay tweaks, e.g. difficulty is set to hard and you have no restarts. Once you die, you have to start over again. There is a time limit in each level that you have to beat, and headshots will freeze the timer for a couple of seconds. To conserve time there aren't any cutscenes either. This mode really is for hardcore MoH players and I doubt that any of the one-timers will enjoy it.

    And finally there is MP. Crafted from scratch with Frostbite it's completely a different game. This is the best part of the game hands down. You can choose a class with different set of weapons and level yourself up the get better in hunting down the opposition. You can engage in different type of game modes like: Team Assault (deathmatch), Sector Control (capture the flag), Clean Sweep (deathmatch without respawns) or Objective Raid (attack or defend certain assets) among others. It doesn't introduce anything new, but at least what it does, it does very well. No question that if you are an experienced FPS player you should skip the SP in its entirety and go straight to the MP to have some fun.

    Rating: 55/100; Replay Value: 1/5; To Beat: 5 hours; Played on: normal.    … Expand
  72. Klewer
    Sep 13, 2013
    6
    A solid modern shooter that does the basics well with strong graphics, sound and gameplay mechanics. But it really brings nothing new or overly interesting to the genre. Very linear and predictable makes this game quite boring at times.

    Worth a look if a fan of modern shooters but nothing extraordinary to see here.
  73. SolidState
    Sep 4, 2013
    2
    Disappointing. The stoy is too short and completely uninteresting. Super-easy even on the hardest setting. Not challenging at all. Really good graphics and even better sound, but its flaws kill the sense of immersion completelly. It's too linear, you're always led, directed by a squadmate who tells you exactly what to do, and don't you dare doing something different because then the gameDisappointing. The stoy is too short and completely uninteresting. Super-easy even on the hardest setting. Not challenging at all. Really good graphics and even better sound, but its flaws kill the sense of immersion completelly. It's too linear, you're always led, directed by a squadmate who tells you exactly what to do, and don't you dare doing something different because then the game goes from absurdly-easy to totally-imposible. Sometimes it feels more like watching a (very boring) film than playing a game.

    It's a real shame, because the gameplay is really good and you're put into very different situations, it's just the total lack of freedom that ruins it all.

    Could've been a 8 or 9 but for me it never got past 2.    … Expand
  74. delaiah
    Sep 2, 2013
    3
    Played only the single player campaign. If you plan on buying this game, get ready for bugs (I had to reload the game plenty of times to be able to perform some in game action needed for level progress), stupid opponents, practically no story line, immortal team members, confusing level design and confusing graphic design at times.

    Because of these, I found the game hard to enjoy. The    Played only the single player campaign. If you plan on buying this game, get ready for bugs (I had to reload the game plenty of times to be able to perform some in game action needed for level progress), stupid opponents, practically no story line, immortal team members, confusing level design and confusing graphic design at times.

    Because of these, I found the game hard to enjoy. The enemies are too easily to eliminate to feel any satisfaction, the bugs make you fight the game itself instead of the bad guys. The absence of a story line and uninspired levels got me bored too quickly too often.

    Overall, this is not a title you want to spend your on unless it's on a huge sale and you're out of FPS games at the moment.    … Expand
  75. tetrasaure
    Aug 25, 2013
    8
    The story was continuous instead of other games modern games where the story has to jump through time. I wish there was a little more of an loft objective to the game other than Rabbit dying at the end for the medal of honor and the game was a little short. Overall a great shooter and you won't be sorry.
  76. ArthurVon
    Aug 23, 2013
    3
    I remember the old Medal of Honor games, this is a shame for the brand, this game has bugs(not to mention the DUMBEST AI I ever seen, even in Hard mode) and stupid things (your teammates carries infinite ammo and you can't, WTF The game is boring, the story is poorly written (the same story about the evil middle-east guys bla bla bla), I don't know what is good about this game...luckily iI remember the old Medal of Honor games, this is a shame for the brand, this game has bugs(not to mention the DUMBEST AI I ever seen, even in Hard mode) and stupid things (your teammates carries infinite ammo and you can't, WTF The game is boring, the story is poorly written (the same story about the evil middle-east guys bla bla bla), I don't know what is good about this game...luckily i got this with a bundle of other games for just 1 not worth a penny tho.… Expand
  77. Desmau5
    Aug 22, 2013
    3
    It's a game about realism, so it disabled the HUD.

    It still shows bodyshots and headshots when you kill an enemy, and the guns have no recoil. Enemy AI is very limited to what its scripted to do, the enemies will never change and always be predictable. The gameplay is stale, it has less character then a cardboard box. It usually limits to: You're a bad-ass, shoot people cause they    It's a game about realism, so it disabled the HUD.

    It still shows bodyshots and headshots when you kill an enemy, and the guns have no recoil.
    Enemy AI is very limited to what its scripted to do, the enemies will never change and always be predictable.

    The gameplay is stale, it has less character then a cardboard box.
    It usually limits to: You're a bad-ass, shoot people cause they aren't American.

    Multiplayer is not very fun, boring and badly designed maps, and the servers are usually dead, the EXP and leveling system is very cliche.

    Singleplayer is 2 hours of torture, you go through Afghanistan and kill people, and the guns are unrealistic and you run very slowly, enemies are not scared of being shot in the face, if you shoot a enemy in the face with the pistol, he shrugs it off like nothing happens, when you shoot his feet on accident, he screams in pain and moves back into cover.

    This is a bad game, it tried to hard to be a good game, and didn't put any effort into characters.    … Expand
  78. squarepower
    Aug 19, 2013
    0
    Avoid this trash. I only got it because it was in the Humble Bundle. Absolute waste of disk space. Terrible. Not worth playing. Rubbish. Uninstalled.
  79. joefresco
    Aug 19, 2013
    0
    Horrible multiplayer. Bad maps, bad guns, bad graphics, bad animations, bad hit registration, bad everything. Absolute junk. Bad, bad, bad, bad, 150 char.
  80. AlFredo2
    Aug 19, 2013
    0
    Terrible, terrible multiplayer. Physics are horrible. Running feels like you're trudging through molasses. Hit registration is terrible. Maps are tiny choke-point campfests with glitches everywhere.
  81. l0rdm0rd
    Aug 17, 2013
    2
    The worst single player shooter I have played in a long time. super generic, linear, boring level design with thousands of blatantly stupid AI enemies that fall like flies. I played the whole game through in hard mode and it was never a challenge. I could run to the enemy spawn and stab them to death more than once. The story is generic US american about heroes in a seal team that shootsThe worst single player shooter I have played in a long time. super generic, linear, boring level design with thousands of blatantly stupid AI enemies that fall like flies. I played the whole game through in hard mode and it was never a challenge. I could run to the enemy spawn and stab them to death more than once. The story is generic US american about heroes in a seal team that shoots everything that moves. The weapons all feel the same, none are really fun. I just used the pistol as my main gun at some point to give me some alteration and a bit of a challenge. But as you have practically unlimited ammo all the time you can also just go full auto and run around like a mental. You will still be successfull. 2 points only for nice sound and okay graphics. But for a frostbyte engine there is nearly no destructable environment.… Expand
  82. Disacar
    Aug 17, 2013
    7
    Yes its a CoD copy with a much better sound engine/shooter mechanics but with weak character development (i think im pointing this in every game i played recently...) and plot. A lot of AI malfunction and gamebreaking moments but Fun to play, i d give a 6 if it wasnt for the amazing sound engine.
  83. JimCorbett
    Aug 15, 2013
    4
    Bug and glitches plague this game. It's sad really, because some parts of it are very well done. The sounds and graphical effects are among the best I've seen. Just about everything else is poorly done. Squad mates are constantly getting in your way, you're given vague objectives and will often times not know what to do. Sometimes your squad mate will say "Take out that enemy right there!"Bug and glitches plague this game. It's sad really, because some parts of it are very well done. The sounds and graphical effects are among the best I've seen. Just about everything else is poorly done. Squad mates are constantly getting in your way, you're given vague objectives and will often times not know what to do. Sometimes your squad mate will say "Take out that enemy right there!" Where? "He's right there! Get him so we can move on!" Yeah, terrible AI. Enemies spawn right next to you and move awkwardly, sprinting is pretty much the same exact speed as walking, uninspired level design, 4 hour long campaign... the list goes on and on.

    It's a shame. I really wanted to like this game as I'm a huge fan of the franchise. All we can hope for now is that EA can get a brain and take the franchise back to its roots... singleplayer campaign focused, no squad mates, WWII setting...    … Expand
  84. aborle
    May 25, 2013
    6
    **SP ONLY**
    I kinda actually like this game, even though i will not give it higher than 6/10 The first thing is like is that this game differentiates itself from its cousins (CoD and BFs) by being very focused on the US special forces Seals and Rangers to be specific. It was interesting to follow the operatives story and see how it plays out. The pacing itself is better than CoD (ie its    **SP ONLY**
    I kinda actually like this game, even though i will not give it higher than 6/10 The first thing is like is that this game differentiates itself from its cousins (CoD and BFs) by being very focused on the US special forces Seals and Rangers to be specific. It was interesting to follow the operatives story and see how it plays out. The pacing itself is better than CoD (ie its not over the top action set pieces all the time)

    That being said, there is nothing new in this game. The gunplay is solid but nothing new, the story needed something more to be able to stand out and the linearity gets annoying sometimes.

    Final verdict, Its NOT BAD but its JUST OK. Get it on a sale if you like such Modern Military Shooters.    … Expand
  85. BearKiller
    May 16, 2013
    4
    This game is the definition of mediocrity. If the devs really wanted to honor the troops so much, they really should have tried harder on this game, because all I see is lazy work.

    It's just ridiculous little things like stationary models clipping through other objects. Example: a corpse was in a chair and its hands were clipping through the back of the chair. Plus, there are a ton of    This game is the definition of mediocrity. If the devs really wanted to honor the troops so much, they really should have tried harder on this game, because all I see is lazy work.

    It's just ridiculous little things like stationary models clipping through other objects. Example: a corpse was in a chair and its hands were clipping through the back of the chair. Plus, there are a ton of glitches, some of which made me reset my checkpoint because the game stopped working. I don't understand how such a short, linear game can be so unpolished and buggy. It just shows so much laziness.

    One of my biggest pet peeves is invisible walls, and they are everywhere in this game. I don't get why giving the player a little freedom scares these devs. If they wanted to make a movie they should have just done that instead of forcing me into their carefully scripted, planned out sequences. Games are about choice.

    I won't complain about the length, though, because any longer and this game would have overstayed its welcome. I'm glad it was short so I didn't have to trudge through any more of it.    … Expand
  86. nitai007
    May 1, 2013
    8
    while medal of honor is a bit short, its still a really good game. it has little innovations over other games, but this is still a great shooter. what makes medal of honor unique and good, is that it actually makes sense. the game is based on operation anaconda in 2002. this makes the game much more realistic. the story isnt about saving the world or stopping nuclear war, its aboutwhile medal of honor is a bit short, its still a really good game. it has little innovations over other games, but this is still a great shooter. what makes medal of honor unique and good, is that it actually makes sense. the game is based on operation anaconda in 2002. this makes the game much more realistic. the story isnt about saving the world or stopping nuclear war, its about fighting the taliban and al-qaeda. the plot is really good, and it serves a great and good change from modern "save the world" games. the game also happens in believable locations. you fight in deserts, little villages and snowy mountains. the locations feel realistic, and dont make you jump from one place to another like an action movie. the enviroments are varied as well. the story talks about the brotherhood between the soldiers, and not just being about stone hearted killers (dont worry, you still play as an elite force that arent afraid to pull the triger).
    unfortunetly, the game is pretty short. it also has a big amount of bugs. besides this issues the game is amazing. it doesnt do a lot new but its realisticness and honor for the soldiers really make it much more than an average shooter!!!!!! buy it!!!!!    … Expand
  87. monkeyspunk
    Apr 3, 2013
    7
    As a gaming Vet if you say Medal of Honor i think Awesome single player war game this is a mix match of good single and multiplayer warfare and i enjoy it but think they are losing the plot when it comes to MoH games.
  88. Y4nk33
    Mar 28, 2013
    3
    How the hell could this game get bigger score than Warfighter? Graphics are very bad sometimes though its Frostbite, your weapon stands still no matter how ast you move the mouse, scripts are f****d up, you have to restart a mission in single 10 times to make it work, reflex sight looks like a piece of crap on a piece of glass, there are maximum 15 things, that fall apart if you shoot the,How the hell could this game get bigger score than Warfighter? Graphics are very bad sometimes though its Frostbite, your weapon stands still no matter how ast you move the mouse, scripts are f****d up, you have to restart a mission in single 10 times to make it work, reflex sight looks like a piece of crap on a piece of glass, there are maximum 15 things, that fall apart if you shoot the, though in battlefield bad company 2 (working with frostbite too) nearly every thing in the game fell apart if you shoot them or throw grenades at it, story sucks a lot, intro mission 30 minutes long(wtf?), your secondary weapon has infinite bullets no matter its a pistol or an MP7, friendly NPCs dont cant kill anybody, the game sometimes forgots to load the map so you just run in the nowhere, sniper rifle's scope stands still, so you dont have to hold your breath to mak it stand still. In multiplayer is no killcam so the campers give you spawnkill every damn time.… Expand
  89. MuNyOsZ
    Feb 18, 2013
    8
    Along with the enjoyable storyline, the singleplayer has beautiful graphics, great weapon modelling and surprisingly clever AI. If I’m honest the only problems with the singleplayer are that it has too many cutscenes, beautiful, but too many, and that it takes no more than 3 hours to complete on the hardest difficulty level. Both the multiplayer and the singleplayer are great fun andAlong with the enjoyable storyline, the singleplayer has beautiful graphics, great weapon modelling and surprisingly clever AI. If I’m honest the only problems with the singleplayer are that it has too many cutscenes, beautiful, but too many, and that it takes no more than 3 hours to complete on the hardest difficulty level. Both the multiplayer and the singleplayer are great fun and involve hugely satisfying action. Although the multiplayer provides some fast-paced action, it is mostly team work based, so if you are looking for a CoD like multiplayer experience, where you just run around aimlessly shooting whoever you see, then this game is not for you (well, not its multiplayer anyway…). Otherwise, the multiplayer provides hours of additional fun with its refreshingly challenging game play. As I’ve already mentioned, it focuses extensively on teamwork and also encourages a cover-to-cover, tactical play style. I think that this is one of the best shooters that I have played in years, definitely better than some of the latest CoD titles.… Expand
  90. Dubroc
    Feb 17, 2013
    6
    Game style like Call Of Duty Modern Warfare or Battlefield 3, but never to live up to these. The story is weak and it feels incomplete without a clear purpose. The gameplay is pretty good, but neither is at the level of its competitors.

    Only recommended if you get it at a low price and if you have played the games mentioned above.
  91. sambartle
    Feb 8, 2013
    9
    For those who have tired of CoD's repetitive gameplay where all you do is rush and die, then reload and repeat that, this is an awesome game, it does however have one major failing.. campaign mode is about 50% the length it should be.

    Graphically theres no complaints, although you can sometimes tell they wanted it to work on console too. Overall though.. Hiighly recommended change    For those who have tired of CoD's repetitive gameplay where all you do is rush and die, then reload and repeat that, this is an awesome game, it does however have one major failing.. campaign mode is about 50% the length it should be.

    Graphically theres no complaints, although you can sometimes tell they wanted it to work on console too.

    Overall though.. Hiighly recommended change from the norm. The first game i've played right through in one sitting in a long time, and its kickstarted my PC gaming again I think, I'd forgotten just how much better the PC is to the consoles.    … Expand
  92. snowshreder
    Dec 25, 2012
    4
    First lets do a simple comparison, Call of Duty has a good campaign and fast multiplayer environment kinda like speed ball if you will BF3 has a great campaign and a vast multiplayer instead of calling in a bomb strike like on call of duty you need to get in a plane and drop some loads. Now with that being said Medal Of Honor failed in multiple areas here, The campaign was boring andFirst lets do a simple comparison, Call of Duty has a good campaign and fast multiplayer environment kinda like speed ball if you will BF3 has a great campaign and a vast multiplayer instead of calling in a bomb strike like on call of duty you need to get in a plane and drop some loads. Now with that being said Medal Of Honor failed in multiple areas here, The campaign was boring and multiplayer is like call of duty but worse way worse it makes COD look polished. the Graphics are pretty bad the mechanics are crap especially running you get that tunnel vision when you run and cant turn quick. Overall i got the game for $10 steam holiday sale so there are no regrets but i feel MOH has had its last chance with my wallet especially with all of the advertisement which had more thought put in than that of the game.… Expand
  93. guildleader117
    Nov 14, 2012
    7
    When it comes to graphics and artwork it looks amazing. But getting down to the core experience of the game it lacked a little. The campaign has it's fair share of surprises but is brought back down to earth when it becomes a little repetitive. Definitely a big improvement from danger closes first game back in 2010. When it comes to multiplayer the maps seem to be unbalanced but thatWhen it comes to graphics and artwork it looks amazing. But getting down to the core experience of the game it lacked a little. The campaign has it's fair share of surprises but is brought back down to earth when it becomes a little repetitive. Definitely a big improvement from danger closes first game back in 2010. When it comes to multiplayer the maps seem to be unbalanced but that can change depending on how well you work with your squad mates. Overall this game has action and a strong competitive nature that will keep you coming back for more. So grab a few buddies and maybe a couple beers and dive into the action!… Expand
  94. Jacer200
    Oct 21, 2012
    6
    This is one of the worst ports I have ever played. There are no AA settings and the FOV is very poor. This is one of the shortest fps games I have ever played @ about 5hrs. With that said the action is past paced and fun. People talk about MoH as being realistic, but it's not. This is more of an arcade shooter. The on bright spot in this game is the audio for people Sound BlasterThis is one of the worst ports I have ever played. There are no AA settings and the FOV is very poor. This is one of the shortest fps games I have ever played @ about 5hrs. With that said the action is past paced and fun. People talk about MoH as being realistic, but it's not. This is more of an arcade shooter. The on bright spot in this game is the audio for people Sound Blaster Titanium HD sound cards. When you configure your sound in Windows to output 5.1 channels, set MoH sound to Theater, turn on CMSS-3d in sound card settings and use headphones (LOL) you get really good audio.… Expand
  95. kane148
    Aug 6, 2012
    7
    I bought this solely for the single-player campaign and was not disappointed. The gameplay is much like the Modern Warfare games: heavily scripted with few tactical options and the usual assortment of spec forces weapons. What I really enjoyed, however, was the story and characters. Unlike COD, there aren't any massive invasions, nuclear weapons, or evil masterminds, and while the mainI bought this solely for the single-player campaign and was not disappointed. The gameplay is much like the Modern Warfare games: heavily scripted with few tactical options and the usual assortment of spec forces weapons. What I really enjoyed, however, was the story and characters. Unlike COD, there aren't any massive invasions, nuclear weapons, or evil masterminds, and while the main characters are obviously elite, they are just men--no superheros. I found it refreshing to play a game with believable scenarios where doing important stuff doesn't mean saving the world for the fourth time. I would have really liked it if this game had additional single-player content (bonus missions, survival mode, etc.) but since I only paid $5 for it on Steam, I suppose I can't complain.… Expand
  96. BarkSpear
    Jun 29, 2012
    0
    This is possibly the worst excuse for a 'modern game' ever. Single Player (as multiplayer was for some reason made separately): A boring, excessively linear campaign with no interesting or engaging story whatsoever. The physics are terrible, and the graphics are atrocious. They wouldn't look out of place in one of the old conflict games. The enemy AI acts as though it hasn't been finished.This is possibly the worst excuse for a 'modern game' ever. Single Player (as multiplayer was for some reason made separately): A boring, excessively linear campaign with no interesting or engaging story whatsoever. The physics are terrible, and the graphics are atrocious. They wouldn't look out of place in one of the old conflict games. The enemy AI acts as though it hasn't been finished. Too many times I've seen enemy fighters casually strolling around and dying up to ten seconds after I kill them. Finally, its very short, lasting me only three and a half hours. Multiplayer: I've played this for more than eighty hours to unlock everything and get a good feel for it. My conclusion is that I wasted eighty+ hours of my life. I'll start with dev support, of which there doesn't appear to have ever been. Maps are full to the brim of rocks no taller than ankle high that you have to jump over. I've lost count of the amount of times I've died because i suddenly get stuck on them. There are also issues like gaps in walls (which obviously haven't been placed properly) which you can be shot through without being able to see your attacker. Any active devs would have patched these issues. Again, physics are awful. I've played with friends to test this, and headshots do not work. I had a friend crouch, and I shot him point blank in the head with an M16. I got a hit marker, no kill. It took a further four headshots to kill him. This repeats for every other weapon. I only ever achieved headshots when shooting just above the chest on the neck, which forgive me if I'm wrong, isn't the location of one's head. Getting kills online is just as random. Many a time I've melee'd a player, seen blood spurt from there sprite, then had them turn around and shoot me. Realism mode is a joke, and not a funny one. Even here, kills require half a clip and grenades have to be touching a player when they explode to kill. Only yesterday I found a player hiding behind a box in the corner of two walls. As i was too far away to risk breaking cover for a melee kill, i loaded up my noob tube and fired at him from around 10 feet away. Direct hit, no kill. I reloaded, closed to four feet away and fired again. Direct hit, no kill. Friendly fire is quite the opposite. Hitting a mentally challenged teammate who runs in front of you kills in as little as two shots. There is a clear difference in team and enemy health where team damage is concerned. There aren't many weapons in multiplayer, especially concerning handguns, and the ones present fire exactly the same as each other. Shotguns aren't used by anyone, as they cannot kill even at close range. Battle rifles can't kill at any range, especially the G10. Snipers are a constant issue in most maps, although when using the sniper rifle myself, I can't see why. It requires the neck-headshot for a kill, with all other shots even to the heart resulting in a lonely hit marker. Some people just spend so much time camping they get used to it, especially in Helmand Valley (worst map). The maps have been designed quite well, excepting Helmand valley, with very few spots being completely hidden. The airfield map is a favourite, though for some reason is declining on the hugely laggy community servers. They aren't designed with spawn points in mind though, as blatant spawn killing is easy and frequent on all maps. The tower at the end of the airfield actually looks over the final enemy spawn point. Cheating is also quite an issue. I've personally watched three aimbot users randomly turning around super-fast and getting neck-headshots. I personally keep a list of rude, abusive or cheating players, and it is dominated by MoH players. Every time I play with any of them their K/D's are sky high and killing them just doesn't work. Obviously many would say. 'get over it, you're probably wrong', which may be true, but four of those people i wrote down have since been banned after being caught cheating on certain servers. Finally, walls. Again. Bullets penetrate every wall in the game without losing power. Rocks (?!) have the same problem. There is no such thing as cover in this game. Pre-order weapons aren't available even now, even as DLC. Obviously this means most players are denied some cool weapons to break up the monotony of the same boring weapons over and over, and the devs miss an obvious source of income. Conclusion: The devs got bored. That has to be it. This reminds me of Breach in that it has excellent potential, but has been abandoned in a vanilla state with soooooo many issues. I wish I could get my 80 hours refunded. And as for the common argument of those who post 10's (?!), the game is about as realistic as Magicka. It is nothing like the situation in Afghanistan, has no realistic physics and no convincing story or graphics. Please present a viable argument. Oh, and watch out for 1RCN servers. Half the guys flashing their tag have hacked or ignore hackers.… Expand
  97. DrBrogbo
    Jun 4, 2012
    7
    I was surprised by this game. First, the previews made it sound awesome, then initial reviews were terrible, then once people got over the price-shock, reviews started to improve. I picked this game up for $5, and didn't expect much, but I genuinely enjoyed it. The graphics are not the best (definitely not horrible though), and there were a few missions that absolutely pissed me off (oneI was surprised by this game. First, the previews made it sound awesome, then initial reviews were terrible, then once people got over the price-shock, reviews started to improve. I picked this game up for $5, and didn't expect much, but I genuinely enjoyed it. The graphics are not the best (definitely not horrible though), and there were a few missions that absolutely pissed me off (one of the stealth missions), but once I decided to screw it and just kill everyone, it stopped being annoying. The campaign was fairly short (decent length for a shooter), but it was well done. This is definitely a story-driven FPS, and it pulls it off well. The ending was actually quite touching, and I absolutely loved how they dedicated the game to all the unsung heroes laying their lives on the line every day. Now that it's no longer $60, I recommend picking up a copy if you like shooters. I enjoyed it. Never tried multiplayer, but I hate the latest blend of kill-streak competitive multiplayer shooters anyway, so meh.… Expand
  98. Ghoster
    Jun 2, 2012
    6
    This game have too much bad reviews then it deserve. It's multiplayer is not close to BF awesomeness, but not bad as COD also. Some unbalanced things in game give space to some players to abuse that which sometimes ruin game to players which expect variety. Until end of the year new MOH is announced. They have only few things to make better and this game have potential to become score 10!
  99. iamkyo90
    May 19, 2012
    4
    The single player campaign is short, the multiplayer is abandoned. The game gives a sense of unfinished in all its aspects, graphics, sound, gameplay. Maybe they rushed to release this game, but really the Medal of Honor franchise deserves better.
  100. Skytop
    Mar 30, 2012
    8
    Now that the price has gone down, this game is worth a try.

    The Single-Player is well made and fun to play through, but unfortunately way shorter than it should have been. Which is a shame, because the game is seriously stunning while it lasts. Just over a year later, the Multiplayer's been fixed up for the most part, and is still moderately active. If you've got a spare $20, this game    Now that the price has gone down, this game is worth a try.

    The Single-Player is well made and fun to play through, but unfortunately way shorter than it should have been. Which is a shame, because the game is seriously stunning while it lasts. Just over a year later, the Multiplayer's been fixed up for the most part, and is still moderately active.

    If you've got a spare $20, this game is definitely worth a try.    … Expand
prev
Page:

Awards & Rankings

85
#85 Best PC Game of 2010
17
#17 Most Discussed PC Game of 2010
31
#31 Most Shared PC Game of 2010

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
72

Mixed or average reviews - based on 26 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 16 out of 26
  2. Mixed: 9 out of 26
  3. Negative: 1 out of 26
  1. Worth Playing
    Sep 19, 2011
    75
    Overall, Medal of Honor is visually and aurally outstanding, but it needs much more polish on gameplay, scripted events, character/scene transitions and narrative construction before it's ready to really run with the big dogs.
    Read full review
  2. Absolute Games
    Jan 15, 2011
    60
    Medal of Honor doesn't become the current image of Electronic Arts – probably the most "humane" of all videogame corporations. Danger Close Games' debut reminds of a time when EA was a gloomy assembly line churning out soulless yearly sequels and movie tie-ins.
    Read full review
  3. LEVEL (Czech Republic)
    Jan 13, 2011
    70
    Good news: This is not Call of Duty. Bad news: This is not Call of Duty. Interesting environs and fast paced action can't hide more than a few story holes and the overall stupidity of opponents. [Issue#197]
See all critic reviews »