Medal of Honor

 PC
User Score
6.5

Mixed or average reviews- based on 657 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 267 out of 657
  2. Mixed: 257 out of 657
  3. Negative: 133 out of 657
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. OniGioRi
    Sep 7, 2023
    7
    Medal of Honor is a beautiful game. Short but enough to make you experience the real brotherhood and sacrifice for the motherland.
  2. PenetratorGod
    Sep 1, 2023
    7
    Even if it was not successful compared to the games of the COD Modern Warfare series, it was not a mediocre game. I remember I loved it at the time.
  3. threeoftendie
    Feb 14, 2023
    7
    Ставлю оценку одиночной компании, в мультиплеер не заходил. Однако этого мне достаточно, чтобы утверждать, что в целом здесь оценка игре занижена - как от критиков, так и от игроков. Нет, я все понимаю: "очередной клон "Modern Warfare", гораздо менее масштабный и драйвовый, может, и не стоит наравне с MW2, но не может не зацепить своеобразным реализмом, переносом места действия вСтавлю оценку одиночной компании, в мультиплеер не заходил. Однако этого мне достаточно, чтобы утверждать, что в целом здесь оценка игре занижена - как от критиков, так и от игроков. Нет, я все понимаю: "очередной клон "Modern Warfare", гораздо менее масштабный и драйвовый, может, и не стоит наравне с MW2, но не может не зацепить своеобразным реализмом, переносом места действия в Афганистан, зону реальных боев, и попыткой серьезного рассказа об этой войне с безрадостным концом. В то же время, недостатки действительно дают о себе знать по ходу прохождения, и тем не менее я не могу оценить эту игру ниже.… Expand
  4. DonldTrump_45Th
    Jan 26, 2023
    7
    Hello, this is a default review because i'm forced to use 75 characters. I'll edit this review in the future talking about the game, don't worry ;)

    My final rate is: 7
  5. Giero
    Jan 3, 2023
    5
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  6. haruorjatta
    Sep 10, 2022
    6
    Не смотря на посредственное техническое исполнение и регулярные баги игра оставляет относительно приятные впечатления за счет аркадного геймплея с грамотными попытками в реализм и простой, но в то же время работающей истории.Не смотря на посредственное техническое исполнение и регулярные баги игра оставляет относительно приятные впечатления за счет аркадного геймплея с грамотными попытками в реализм и простой, но в то же время работающей истории.
  7. SewAwOw
    Aug 9, 2022
    7
    Стандартный боевичок конца 00-начала 10х годов. Пафосный, коридорный, с попыткой в сюжет и драму. На разок по подписке EA Play пойдет.
  8. churros
    Feb 5, 2022
    7
    Pros:
    + graphics aged well
    + weapons controls well
    + balanced difficulty
    + machine guns

    Cons:
    - boring mission design
    - forgettable story and characters
    - too scripted
  9. moonlaba
    Jan 17, 2022
    7
    전장의 느낌은 은근 잘 살렸지만 그런 미션마저 몇개없다. 쓸데없는 헬기미션이랑 저격미션같은거만 뺏으면 오히려 수작이 됬을수도......
  10. Fallconex
    Dec 17, 2020
    7
    Not bad, not great. First-person shooter Medal of Honor - shows a real war, not a simple drama.
  11. RockerKR
    Nov 17, 2020
    7
    Good Game lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
  12. Manzanetti
    Aug 10, 2020
    6
    Liked the campaign bit, had some cool moments. The realism is cool, but falls a bit into the generic pile of FPS.
  13. Kotofon
    Jun 6, 2020
    7
    Сеттинг новой части, сделанной на основе геймплейных особенностей всех предыдущих, это не Вторая Мировая Война, а события в Афганистане. События игры во многом проливают свет на настоящее положение дел, рассказывают о подлинной войне в Афганистане. Главный герой принимает участие в масштабных и стелс сражениях. Шутер от первого лица Medal of Honor — показывает настоящую войну, а не простуюСеттинг новой части, сделанной на основе геймплейных особенностей всех предыдущих, это не Вторая Мировая Война, а события в Афганистане. События игры во многом проливают свет на настоящее положение дел, рассказывают о подлинной войне в Афганистане. Главный герой принимает участие в масштабных и стелс сражениях. Шутер от первого лица Medal of Honor — показывает настоящую войну, а не простую драму.… Expand
  14. SurujSingha
    May 20, 2020
    6
    I am disappointed with the campaign, it had the potential. The story is uninspiring, the maps of the Afghanistan deserts were poorly detailed. The AI is pathetically dumb and makes the gunplay even more boring. They were like 3 or 4 missions that were actually good. Except that, every missions looks like the same with identical objectives.
  15. r03vg
    Apr 17, 2020
    7
    Игра похожа на прослойку между Call of Duty и Battlefield. Удивила хорошей графикой и приятной стрельбой. Сюжет забудете на следующий же день.
  16. shauntmw
    Apr 12, 2020
    7
    I bought and played the EA Origin version of this game.
    I play purely for the single player campaign, since I am not a fan of multiplayer FPS.
    First of all, the game doesn't launch properly via EA Origin app. The updater will fail to update the game, and you have to manually launch the updated from the game installation folder. Once updated, the game will fail to launch via Origin, you    I bought and played the EA Origin version of this game.
    I play purely for the single player campaign, since I am not a fan of multiplayer FPS.

    First of all, the game doesn't launch properly via EA Origin app. The updater will fail to update the game, and you have to manually launch the updated from the game installation folder. Once updated, the game will fail to launch via Origin, you need to launch the game manually via the game installation folder again. Not a big deal, but still pretty annoying.

    There is a significant input-lag for me, almost half a seconds. Running, crouching, even aiming and moving the mouse feels pretty bad. After searching on the Internet and trying everything for a bit, I find that disabling mouse acceleration improves a lot.

    The campaign is short, but feels good and heroic to play. Minor glitches happens here and there, but nothing game breaking. Very nice graphics and music, the dialogues are great, the missions are good.    … Expand
  17. dontlike911
    Feb 25, 2020
    6
    ot a CoD beater but definitely close. This game is about realism, not arcade shooting. The SP is action-packed but short, with only 5 hrs of gameplay. You are in the War in Afghanistan, fighting the Taliban forces in actual operations that took place in 2001-2005. Y
  18. 75978
    Feb 9, 2019
    6
    in General, a good game as the graphics but clumsy gameplay spoils the impression of the game plot: standard
  19. forfb
    Jun 2, 2018
    6
    That's one big underrated game. The campaign was a pure pleasure. Short, but properly balanced between action and story-telling. The story was surprisingly good. What I expected was yet another FPS game set somewhere in Afghanistan. But wow! Throughout gameplay you play as the U.S. Soldiers that were sent to Afghanistan as a payback shortly after 9/11 terrorist attack on WTC. Idk if IThat's one big underrated game. The campaign was a pure pleasure. Short, but properly balanced between action and story-telling. The story was surprisingly good. What I expected was yet another FPS game set somewhere in Afghanistan. But wow! Throughout gameplay you play as the U.S. Soldiers that were sent to Afghanistan as a payback shortly after 9/11 terrorist attack on WTC. Idk if I understood it correctly, but it bares kind of an anti-war meaning after all, especially the ending, though. It's not a perfect game but it had it's moment, like very emotional final defense of the squad and so on.
    I'm not going any further into the story details as it's something you should experience on your own, not read on the internet. Go and try it, it's cheap and deffinietly worth its current price.

    I also feel like I should say something about multiplayer. It's not full of players but there are some servers that are (mostly) active all day. It was a very bad idea to make a decision that multiplayer and singleplayer mode should be developed by two different companies. Multiplayer - developed by DICE -differs too much from the singleplayer. Naturaly, people who'd buy the game, will finish the campaign first and then move on to the multiplayer. Man, it was hell to get used to different mechanics in shooting, running, crouching, throwing grenades and pretty much everything you was thought previously.
    Even guns sounds were replaced for some reason. Idk why they did it, probably deadline issue.
    Nevertheless, if you finaly get used to what you're not used to after singleplayer it's still meh. Not good, not bad, just average.

    I feel like it's singleplayer that makes the game worth trying. As I said, if you're an FPS games kinda guy and you're looking for something to play,
    Medal of Honor is cheap, go and buy it.    … Expand
  20. azgoodaz
    Mar 9, 2017
    5
    Does Medal of Honor (2010) still hold up?

    I didn’t even finish the game. The game didn’t let me go past the 3rd to last mission. I keep getting put into a place where to defend a position and yet I hold it for 10 minutes and nothing happens. I tried restarting the checkpoint and that doesn’t work. Other than that, the audio/dialogue is great and for being a 2010 game, the game    Does Medal of Honor (2010) still hold up?

    I didn’t even finish the game. The game didn’t let me go past the 3rd to last mission. I keep getting put into a place where to defend a position and yet I hold it for 10 minutes and nothing happens. I tried restarting the checkpoint and that doesn’t work.

    Other than that, the audio/dialogue is great and for being a 2010 game, the game graphics of destruction, gun sounds and small ambient sounds make the game enjoyable. Truly the only good thing about this game is the hell fighter bomb run and ATV part. The AIM sensitivity and unoptimized screen tearing is what makes the game sometimes unplayable.

    What are flaws? Lowering AIM sensitivity does nothing (it’s really fast when you move the mouse). If you try to launch the game via Origin, you will get fail launch message that states “General protection fault!” error (which they still haven’t fixed) there is no workaround this if you launch it via Origin.

    You will have to play the game without Origin (by putting the game on your desktop, read down below for the steps) if you want to play the campaign. I was playing on 1920x1080 and I sensed the game was causing screen tearing during gameplay and it will sometimes do a millisecond freeze. Running/sprinting seems slow and cutscenes seem unfinished. Plus 0 achievements for PC users, only the consoles got this.

    Want to play the campaign but you can’t because of the error? Go to the Drive where you installed | MoH > Origin Games > Medal of Honor > Binaries > Open “moh” file (right click and press ‘send to desktop’).

    Note: In the same binarie folder, find a file named “MoHUpdater” and run that as a Admin so that you can apply the patch. If not, you will not be able to play.    … Expand
  21. muzmuz
    Nov 5, 2016
    6
    Talk about incomprehensible story, awkward controls and animations, unstable event triggers, confusing objectives, seemingly limitless enemies, what else? Medal of Honor 2010 failed to blow me away. Nonetheless, it's somehow fun 'til it lasted.
  22. Mahdiar
    Jul 6, 2016
    7
    Gameplay : 7
    Graphics : 8
    Story : 7
    Sound : 8
    **********************************************************************************
    Overall : 7
  23. ogower
    Aug 13, 2015
    5
    Fun enough in its own way but nothing like the triumph that was the original and nothing like it could be given that this is over a decade later. My main issue is that this is the dictionary definition of linear, where deviating even a fraction from the often dull script set out leads to instant death, reflecting lazy design.
  24. sft
    Jul 12, 2015
    7
    An honorable effort

    I only own this game because it came as part of a bundle, and it's not something I would normally play (as a rule I prefer to battle zombies, mutants, and aliens). I was, however, pleasantly surprised by MEDAL OF HONOR. It's a good solid shooter with nice graphics and a realistic atmosphere. The combat is satisfying and reasonably challenging, and it doesn't hold the    An honorable effort

    I only own this game because it came as part of a bundle, and it's not something I would normally play (as a rule I prefer to battle zombies, mutants, and aliens). I was, however, pleasantly surprised by MEDAL OF HONOR. It's a good solid shooter with nice graphics and a realistic atmosphere. The combat is satisfying and reasonably challenging, and it doesn't hold the players hand as much as some games. The single player campaign is, however, very short, at around 6 hours of play, but as I got it pretty much for free I can't complain about that. I can't comment on the multiplayer mode because I haven't played it but the single player part is fun just as long as you don't expect too many hours gameplay from it.    … Expand
  25. Onrush
    May 29, 2015
    7
    The game delivered. Had massive fun with it in my younger days. It filled its own niche and was a relaxing break from the cod franchise. Good times, good times.
  26. DGDrocks7
    Aug 23, 2014
    7
    This game is not as bad as critics say. It's better than I thought it would be. The singleplayer story isn't full of twists and turns, it's more like a tribute to US and NATO troops. Keep it mind as you play the story, many of what you see is happening right now in Afghanistan, especially when you switch to play as a Ranger (most of the time you play as a Navy SEAL). You could feel asThis game is not as bad as critics say. It's better than I thought it would be. The singleplayer story isn't full of twists and turns, it's more like a tribute to US and NATO troops. Keep it mind as you play the story, many of what you see is happening right now in Afghanistan, especially when you switch to play as a Ranger (most of the time you play as a Navy SEAL). You could feel as though you were there. For that, the singleplayer was great. My gripe about it is that it can be finished in 6 hours. And I was playing on the hardest difficulty. Was the game that easy, or is it that I'm good at first-person shooters? The multiplayer, well, that's a different story. I don't know how it has been in the past, but right now, I don't like it. You frequently get spawn-killed and everyone seems to spam grenade and rocket launchers. Some say, it's a combination of Call of Duty and Battlefield. From what I played, I still haven't decided if that's a good or bad thing.

    In the end, where CoD and Battlefield excels in multiplayer, MoH excels in singleplayer. Having been a fan of MoH since 2002, I don't think MoH was meant for MP. Back when the game first came out, I would definitely recommend a rental for the singleplayer. Now that the game is cheap, it's worth buying, so you can check the multiplayer and judge for yourself, but, as I've said, MoH was always a SP game. One day, I'll check on MoH:Warfighter, and see how that game was so bad, EA is putting the series on hold.    … Expand
  27. Neddy
    Jul 2, 2014
    6
    Medal of Honour Airbourne shook my heart, and I cried a little at the end. This Medal of Honor, yes I was emotional a little at the end. You feel, 'Oh no, do the armed forces and the honest Afganistan folk have to go through this'.

    It had the odd error and unclear direction: An objective did not trigger in one place for me, and was stuck facing infinite foes until I run out of ammo.    Medal of Honour Airbourne shook my heart, and I cried a little at the end. This Medal of Honor, yes I was emotional a little at the end. You feel, 'Oh no, do the armed forces and the honest Afganistan folk have to go through this'.

    It had the odd error and unclear direction:

    An objective did not trigger in one place for me, and was stuck facing infinite foes until I run out of ammo. Ah maybe it was me, I'll reload the checkpoint. Same again. Gone through 500 rounds in a rifle that fires single shots, emptied my automatic rifle, and using pistol (that has infinite ammo.) Usually you press F next to a team-mate to get ammo, but in this scenario, they say you have plenty. Even though I am out.

    Anyway I restarted the mission and I was OK. It played out that time as it should.

    Helicopter work. Where in the controls does it say how to fire Hellfire missiles. IT DOESN'T. I had to google for it, after repeating stuff over and over. Next time I noticed there was a quick message flashed up on the screen with instruction how to use. I didn't see it before because I was fighting. Plus I was too busy concentrating on the ENDLESS CHATTER OVER THE RADIO.

    The squelshy squaly endless rubbish banging on over the radio. It talks to you through about 2/5 of the game.

    The graphics and scenery are awesome in places. It opens nicely, and the closing scenes in the mountains and snow are beautiful.    … Expand
  28. mrp11
    Mar 29, 2014
    5
    "Bullets or broken legs" - Mother

    The whole game took me about 5 hours on the hardest difficulty and that is the only sentence I can remind myself after playing it through. The game has kept the level of the game Call of Duty 4 Modern Warfare (2007). With level I mean graphics. No innovation, I would barely even say it has the same engine, but it would be too offensive, because Dice and    "Bullets or broken legs" - Mother

    The whole game took me about 5 hours on the hardest difficulty and that is the only sentence I can remind myself after playing it through. The game has kept the level of the game Call of Duty 4 Modern Warfare (2007). With level I mean graphics. No innovation, I would barely even say it has the same engine, but it would be too offensive, because Dice and Activision have a market fight on sells.

    Once more you have to kill people. Alrighty then. I like shooter games, but people there is no story. You are being dropped somewhere in Afghanistan and have there some operations without any pre-story. It can maitanly be linked to the current Terrorism searching operations... but it was boring. The story was boring. One operation was nice, the quad mission. The others are go there, kill 200 taliban, go somewhere else, let a comrade pick you up so you can play the script further, kill again 200 talibans. Go to spot C, seed a plant of weed, run back to B. Kill again 200 talibans... pretty repetitive.

    Like all games of that kind it has the same problems too. Invincible walls, stupid AI. The snow there looks like an unmoded (without hd textures) Skyrim. You leave no footsteps in the snow... The game is pretty easy. I feeled like I was playing a port from a current console. The game is telling me where to go pushing H, where the enemy hides after I have not found them and of course begging your comrades for bullets. That seems... -> "if the game is too hard for you, please push button f12, DICE will gonna help you".

    That was pretty much critics at all. To speak about some positive aspects the game has an awsome music/sound overlay. I played the game using a 5.1 supporting Headphones and I feeled hilarious! Awsome soundtrack, yummy!

    To sum up:
    - graphic = nothing new since 2007 => 5
    - gameplay = repetitive, boring, no plot => 2
    - sound = hilarious! => 9+

    Total: 5+/10    … Expand
  29. maor4774
    Jan 22, 2014
    7
    now first if you looking for a badass single-player Campaign than this game is not for you, the Campaign is poor and not very fun, however if you look for good multiplayer well you may found it here....many will not like and even hate this game multiplayer, but if you play you very easly see what the game try to do, a realistic FPS who try to be like cod but failed, but with the realisim inow first if you looking for a badass single-player Campaign than this game is not for you, the Campaign is poor and not very fun, however if you look for good multiplayer well you may found it here....many will not like and even hate this game multiplayer, but if you play you very easly see what the game try to do, a realistic FPS who try to be like cod but failed, but with the realisim i know there are alot of gamers who will love this game, so if you like realistic FPS, and like cod more or less, then you going to love this game.… Expand
  30. huss2215
    Nov 14, 2013
    7
    Graphics: The graphics aren’t the best I’ve seen, but they still look pretty damn good. 9.
    Sound: Nice soundtrack, good voice acting, the games guns sounds are okay not the best, and there’s minor grenade explosions, and other destruction sounds that aren’t realistic. 8.5.
    Gameplay: The game is an fps that may seem like a watered down version of Call of Duty, but it can actually    Graphics: The graphics aren’t the best I’ve seen, but they still look pretty damn good. 9.
    Sound: Nice soundtrack, good voice acting, the games guns sounds are okay not the best, and there’s minor grenade explosions, and other destruction sounds that aren’t realistic. 8.5.
    Gameplay: The game is an fps that may seem like a watered down version of Call of Duty, but it can actually hold its own ground. There’s a great mix up of gameplay from linear shoot em up type missions, to stealth missions, vehicle driving, and on rails helicopter battles. Some guns feel unrealistic, while some are good. It has the typical controls you’d expect from an FPS, it isn’t the greatest fps, but it is still worth a playthrough (sp). The multiplayer is fun but this is where the watered down version kicks in. Supposedly it’s done by DICE yet it doesn’t feel as good as their battlefield series. There aren’t any destructible environments, and it feels like an old days FPS shooter. It is still fun, but there are so many other options out that one may look the other way for Medal of Honor. 8.
    Story: The story is okay, it’s based on real life undercover military that are hidden away watching Taliban activity. You’ll find yourself slowly boring away, but some characters can be memorable but they are easily forgotten. The game tries to create sad moments but never really impacts the player. A lesson may need to be learned from Call of Duty when it comes to impact/controversy. 6.5.
    Lasting Appeal: The games singleplayer is very short, you can beat it in 2 sittings if you went all out. There is multiplayer but it isn’t the best. I can recommend this game but there are better options out there. 7.
    Overall Score: 7.8 out of 10.    … Expand
prev
Page:

Awards & Rankings

85
#85 Best PC Game of 2010
17
#17 Most Discussed PC Game of 2010
31
#31 Most Shared PC Game of 2010

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
72

Mixed or average reviews - based on 26 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 16 out of 26
  2. Mixed: 9 out of 26
  3. Negative: 1 out of 26
  1. Worth Playing
    Sep 19, 2011
    75
    Overall, Medal of Honor is visually and aurally outstanding, but it needs much more polish on gameplay, scripted events, character/scene transitions and narrative construction before it's ready to really run with the big dogs.
    Read full review
  2. Absolute Games
    Jan 15, 2011
    60
    Medal of Honor doesn't become the current image of Electronic Arts – probably the most "humane" of all videogame corporations. Danger Close Games' debut reminds of a time when EA was a gloomy assembly line churning out soulless yearly sequels and movie tie-ins.
    Read full review
  3. LEVEL (Czech Republic)
    Jan 13, 2011
    70
    Good news: This is not Call of Duty. Bad news: This is not Call of Duty. Interesting environs and fast paced action can't hide more than a few story holes and the overall stupidity of opponents. [Issue#197]
See all critic reviews »