Medal of Honor: Warfighter

 PC
User Score
5.5

Mixed or average reviews- based on 692 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 241 out of 692
  2. Mixed: 191 out of 692
  3. Negative: 260 out of 692
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. PenetratorGod
    Sep 1, 2023
    5
    Game of the series released in 2010 was not very good, but not mediocre. But I can't say the same for this game. It was a game that tried to copy BF3. Probably one of the main reasons why it was not successful was that it was not an original game.
  2. threeoftendie
    May 8, 2023
    7
    Я прошел эту игру больше 10 лет назад, но не могу вкратце не поделиться своим мнением о ней. Итак, вкратце - она достойна своих оценок. Думаю, не я один на протяжении прохождения столкнулся с багами и провисаниями - особенно провисаниями. Не знаю, может, все дело в моем компьютере или в целом в ПК-версии, что, как мы знаем, часто оказывается правдой, но для меня было бы риском запускать ееЯ прошел эту игру больше 10 лет назад, но не могу вкратце не поделиться своим мнением о ней. Итак, вкратце - она достойна своих оценок. Думаю, не я один на протяжении прохождения столкнулся с багами и провисаниями - особенно провисаниями. Не знаю, может, все дело в моем компьютере или в целом в ПК-версии, что, как мы знаем, часто оказывается правдой, но для меня было бы риском запускать ее еще раз. И вновь отмечу, что сюжет здесь (продолжение предыдущей игры) неплох, он драматичен, развивается в правильном темпе, подается через неплохие катсцены. Ах да, оружие и все, что с ним связано, тоже реализовано совсем неплохо. Но это все. других достоинств, как и недостатков, привести не могу, просто средний шутер, быстро забывающийся, заслуженно или незаслуженно забытый - решайте сами.… Expand
  3. Giero
    Jan 3, 2023
    6
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  4. The_D4RknesS
    Oct 4, 2022
    5
    The game is beautiful and has a nice destruction of scenarios but it has many visual bugs and the game does not allow you to play on easy because it closes alone, the accuracy of the weapons is also bad
  5. Atyne
    Sep 17, 2021
    7
    Huge potential veiled in poor technical state and design.
    +great atmosphere
    +visuals, animations, sounds
    +story

    -inconsistent gunplay - some guns are fun and some have random recoil with a huge spread, etc
    -restrictive scripts
    -multiplayer is terrible - a copy of COD with bad balance
    -terrible UI
    -FOV and mouse sensitivity control
  6. SurujSingha
    May 22, 2020
    5
    Very poorly written, the change of sequences and cutscenes are broken. While it did improve upon the previous MOH game by bringing in more variety in its campaign like the NFS inspired car sequences, but it isnt enough to redeem this franchise. Anyways, i must admit the graphics are satisfactory.
  7. r03vg
    Apr 17, 2020
    7
    Хорошего немножко. Приятно играется, но локации кажутся слишком камерными. К тому же, сюжет кажется совсем простым и непроработанным.
  8. AMBO
    Feb 17, 2020
    7
    07/10......................................................................
  9. derHausmeister
    Mar 17, 2019
    7
    Kampagnen-Review:

    Die Story ist solide, das Gameplay top. Manchmal gibt es hier und da kleine Fehler, z.B. das Gegner neben einem spawnen, weil man "falsch" abgebogen ist. Andererseits kann man, wenn man weiß wo die Gegner herkommen auch direkt eine Granate reinwerfen. Da ich nie gedient habe, geschweige denn im Krieg war, kann ich natürlich nur vermuten, dass das Spiel realistisch    Kampagnen-Review:

    Die Story ist solide, das Gameplay top. Manchmal gibt es hier und da kleine Fehler, z.B. das Gegner neben einem spawnen, weil man "falsch" abgebogen ist. Andererseits kann man, wenn man weiß wo die Gegner herkommen auch direkt eine Granate reinwerfen.
    Da ich nie gedient habe, geschweige denn im Krieg war, kann ich natürlich nur vermuten, dass das Spiel realistisch ist. Das Gefühl habe ich aber bekommen (außer in der letzten Mission, wo man ohne Atemschutz in ein brennendes Haus rennt, ohne umzukippen).
    Die Grafik ist auch heute noch sehr ansehnlich.

    Wenn man das Spiel durch hat, kann man es auf höheren Schwierigkeitsgraden wiederholen.
    Vielleicht tue ich das in ein paar Jahren, wenn ich alles wieder verdrängt habe.    … Expand
  10. Bottlecaps
    Mar 12, 2019
    5
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. medal of honor warfighter when it was announced at E3 i was pretty pumped it looked good and the multiplayer looked like it was gonna mix up the call of duty formula just enough to make it familiar but also new. unfortunately looks seem to be the only thing this game has going for it.

    Story: the story is just your bog standard military shooter story , there is a terrorist and you have to stop him , there are some returning characters from medal of honor 2010 but they are so boring and un distinct that i didn't even realize they were returning characters until the name of your character from medal of honor 2010 was said . one of the returning characters dies witch all i could think when it happened was " ohh i guess the writers do want to take some risks " , in the multiplayer trailers they really pushed the multinational military and seemed to want to celebrate not just the united states military but other military's like Canada , Poland and Sweden so you would think the games story would reflect that ? but the main force you see is always united states.
    Story: 2/10

    World building : this world seems narrow and hallow the only bit of world building that seems to have been done was making dusty a cia operative. world building to me is what makes a games world feel real and a man moving up in a career is a very believable and the failing marriage of preacher adds to it as well but the thing was written so poorly i kinda laughed at it. and adding in other country's military could have went a long way in rectifying this , the potential was there for this one but the did not take it
    world building 2/10

    Graphics: the graphics are good, its one of the few things EA can boast about . EA usually disappoints me every time i play one of their games now a days in almost every aspect but graphics if i had to say anything bad about the graphics it would be that the animations feel a little clunky and there is very little style but a mute style usually services a realistic military shooter like this so it works
    graphics: 8/10

    Gameplay: its mostly a pretty standard game , they tried to mix it up a little bit with the breaching mechanic but a lot of those animations seemed impractical and i ended up just choosing witch ever animation was the quickest .Other than that you point you shoot you kill some bad guys and bam you've reached the end. its really all standard. i enjoyed playing it but only because i enjoy first person shooters
    Gameplay: 5/10

    sound design: the voice acting was actually pretty good and was something that slightly impressed me, even if i didn't care at all about these characters it actually felt like the voice actors did and that's a good thing . the guns and explosions sound pretty good but nothing to write home about. the music was forgettable, as in im struggling to even remember if there was music . other than the lack of music the sounds were pretty good
    Sound design: 5/10

    medal of honor is a worth while game if you can get it on sale for like 3-4 dollars and it will take up an afternoon or so , if a military shooter is what you want that's what you will get but don't expect anything ground breaking and this is certainly not a masterpiece

    2+2+8+5+5= 23
    23/5= 4.6 (i am rounding up to keep with the out of 10 on this website ( so 5/10 )    … Expand
  11. gold
    Jan 16, 2019
    5
    Было скучно: скучнее, чем предыдущая часть. Сюжет - 5... Мне больше нечего сказать.
    Итог: 5.000/10
  12. IvanWolf
    Oct 19, 2018
    5
    not a bad shooter at once.
    many mistakes, bad plot (boring and not interesting), not bad shooting physics, average graphics for his age. In general, the usual conveyor shooting gallery similar to the call of duty.
  13. dabyd1304
    Jan 10, 2017
    6
    No esperaba absolutamente nada de esta última entrega de Medal of Honor después del reboot tan desastroso del anterior. Y me he encontrado con uno de los mejores shooters bélicos modernos que recuerdo. Aún así la formula de este genero no da para mucho más en estas grandes producciones tan centradas en el multijugador. Sin embargo ahí está una campana individual bastante decente. A pesarNo esperaba absolutamente nada de esta última entrega de Medal of Honor después del reboot tan desastroso del anterior. Y me he encontrado con uno de los mejores shooters bélicos modernos que recuerdo. Aún así la formula de este genero no da para mucho más en estas grandes producciones tan centradas en el multijugador. Sin embargo ahí está una campana individual bastante decente. A pesar de compartir muchas malas costumbres de sus primos-hermanos, este Warfighter si que merece la pena para entretenerse un par de tardes.… Expand
  14. muzmuz
    Jan 7, 2017
    6
    A dirty and buggy Battlefield-style game with a boring story and a so-so gameplay that falls short of being non-repetitive. Did I forget to mention that the protagonist's love interest looks extremely unattractive and unfit for the main character?
  15. Tomle1202
    Jan 29, 2016
    5
    Medal of Honor: Warfighter is a flat, one-dimensional experience full of moments that you have seen and things that you have done a million times before.
  16. jelikey
    Sep 10, 2015
    6
    MoH: Warfighter suffers from an inconsistent campaign and brings nothing new to the multiplayer arena; however, Danger Close do show some potential and perhaps their next title will not be so compromised - for now, 7/10 - higher if you like the MP but lower if you're after a satisfying campaign.
  17. toberewoven571
    May 24, 2015
    5
    plot ,dialogue ,mission objective ,gameplay,characters design can be improve.
    graphics is nice

    i assume they are trying their best to make this game better than Cod/BF
  18. Neddy
    Jan 1, 2015
    7
    Score 7/10, if you buy on a good sale price. If it's bought for more than £9 the score goes down significantly. However I do not include the multiplayer content as I never compete online.

    MOH:W is quite short. At 6.5 hours this took me to complete, you need to buy it on a budget price offering. I will no doubt play it again. 7/10 is a low sort of score but only because even when bought    Score 7/10, if you buy on a good sale price. If it's bought for more than £9 the score goes down significantly. However I do not include the multiplayer content as I never compete online.

    MOH:W is quite short. At 6.5 hours this took me to complete, you need to buy it on a budget price offering. I will no doubt play it again. 7/10 is a low sort of score but only because even when bought cheap it's still a short game. If MOH and MOH Warfighter were stuck together and bought for £10, that would be a good game. (NB Same characters in both.)

    At the start of the game I was shocked and almost stopped playing. The training for teaching which keys etc for scoping and such, is done as a jihadist. This is in stomach churning taste. Simply not acceptable. However you do get to see that training ground's significance later on.

    Anyway I massively disappointedly passed over that and played on. The game itself was good. It flows and is not too hard in any way. Easier to play than the its predecessor. It looks fine too and is well produced.

    Besides the game being good, the hook for me with game became more evident as the game went on. I like the characters, and if the next instalment has them in I would look forward to it for that. The characters are believable and they are examples of soldiers I like to think exist. Simply cool special-ops in action servicemen.

    It's impossible not to feel a sense of connection to real soldiers fighting for freedom, and their lives. It's the third MOH I have and they all make me emotional at the end. It's a glimpse and taste of combat wrapped up a in smooth shooter.    … Expand
  19. beergogglesftw
    Sep 23, 2014
    7
    Multiplayer Review:

    (+) Gameplay. Feels like Frostbite 2. (+) Map Design. Well balanced for each team and each classes play style. Like that you can almost always "take the high ground" for a tactical advantage, or get into the thick of it. (+) Recoil. Its good to be playing a game with recoil again. (+) Its not Call of Duty or BF3:Close Quarters. Those games force you to run    Multiplayer Review:

    (+) Gameplay. Feels like Frostbite 2.

    (+) Map Design. Well balanced for each team and each classes play style. Like that you can almost always "take the high ground" for a tactical advantage, or get into the thick of it.

    (+) Recoil. Its good to be playing a game with recoil again.

    (+) Its not Call of Duty or BF3:Close Quarters. Those games force you to run around the place and scramble around corners. MOHW has different pacing. The way I play anyway, you need to take your time moving up, working with your fireteam buddy.

    (+) In-Game VOIP. After playing BF3 for the last year, I was really afraid MOHW would use the same crumby voice chat system.

    (-) UI. I keep unlocking things, but have no idea when or how to do so. I just play and hope I'm unlocking something I want.

    (-) I wish the bullets had some more bite to them. I don't like that there's a lot of recoil and unrealistic bullets. You kind of need weak bullets with no recoil, or realistic bullets with lots of recoil. I favor the latter. (That may be something I need to just adjust to, but thats how I feel at the moment.. I should step back into MOHAA/COD1/COD2 before guns became recoil free... and see how those guns were balanced)

    (-) Not supporting my 6850 Crossfire. One card is idle. Newest driver, newest profiles.

    (-) No FOV Slider... I want to bump that up to about 90-100 in-game.

    (-+) Multiplayer graphics. Without my second card, my graphics power is on the weak side so I've been playing on "Auto" which seems to be around "high" settings with a 40 fps. I would like to kick up the appearence and FPS. The driver update just needs to come out.
    Again with the UI... if I make changes to my graphics settings, I'm not sure if any changes are occurring until after I restart the game. There's no message to save, or warning me settings will go in effect at restart.

    So... as of right now, at its core its a good game. People who are used to BF3 and/or Call of Duty expecting this game to feel like one of the other may be surprised that the game does actually have a feeling of its own, and not just a BF3/COD baby. They definitely nailed down some really good things.
    You'll notice in my list of Pros and Cons... I haven't noticed any cons that couldnt be patched very easily. So I'm liking the core gameplay.

    I didn't play MOH(2010) at launch... so I'm curious how I would have felt then compared to now... Still curious how this game will be reviewed, especially since I haven't had time for any Single player which weighs heavily in review scores. They could really knock the game down for its cons I listed, or short campaign (assuming its short).    … Expand
  20. kiloone4one
    Dec 22, 2013
    7
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Campaign is kind of good, but there are some boring missions and some missions when you got to drive instead of shooting. In the campaign there are also too many doors to breach (what if I told you that every door you breached in Medal Of Honor Warfighter was actually open?) Also when you kill guys with a sniper rifle the bullets fly away from them, like if you aim the center of the crosshair in them the bullet will fly left or right or sometimes even down. Also some missions are taking too long to beat them but I still beat the game in 5 hours.… Expand
  21. ComradVlad
    Sep 8, 2013
    7
    Bought, played, what to say. Untill the next battlefield, and not very catchy. Dull game, effectively maximum the beginning, and then just monotonous passage, yet soft and dull voice spoils the whole game. I do not know what the developers were hoping to make the game at Frost, or on the label of the series Well there are many small graphics like the pluses, but you can try it withBought, played, what to say. Untill the next battlefield, and not very catchy. Dull game, effectively maximum the beginning, and then just monotonous passage, yet soft and dull voice spoils the whole game. I do not know what the developers were hoping to make the game at Frost, or on the label of the series Well there are many small graphics like the pluses, but you can try it with textures, animation and special effects repetitive but pleasing to the eye. Oh well, on one pass play. Hoped for more… Expand
  22. keeling2008
    Apr 21, 2013
    7
    I am flabbergasted by the scores some critics have given this game. PCGamer UK I am looking at you right now! An avid reader for many years, you have only wronged me in differing opinions a handful of times in the 10+ years I have subscribed but 35%??? I had to buy the game before I offered my opinion and here it is...

    YOU'RE WRONG! You scoring technique is flawed... as too are many    I am flabbergasted by the scores some critics have given this game. PCGamer UK I am looking at you right now! An avid reader for many years, you have only wronged me in differing opinions a handful of times in the 10+ years I have subscribed but 35%??? I had to buy the game before I offered my opinion and here it is...

    YOU'RE WRONG! You scoring technique is flawed... as too are many other critics score cards that people so often look to when considering a purchase. For example, Alien CM got 48%, Brink the online shooter that had more technical issues on release than I care to mention got a quality 78% even though the single player was rubbish and it was purely a online team game that was still severely lacking. Lastly, Duke Nukem Forever at 80% online score but was published in the magazine at 29% so obviously someone got slapped down! But honestly, the games mentioned above are complete rubbish, not just because they are buggy but because they are lacking in one or all departments story, gameplay, originality, etc. Warfighter should not be labelled in the same category and it just manages to pull itself clear... but only just!

    Warfighter tries to be a big screen blockbuster with a story that is bias and researched poorly, but nonetheless still hits the mark on some occasions. This story was more about the family impacts and the brothers in arms that go to war but the impact fails. Not only that, Preacher's wife and daughter are probably the ugliest game characters I have ever seen! It made it difficult to feel emotional attached and my immersion was totally broken when the game was subjecting me to a serious situation and all I could stare at was Preacher's daughter and her massive EARS!!!!

    Gameplay wise, the game is rough but rewarding. The accuracy of the enemy is far too good and you will find yourself being hit numerous times but with no disadvantages present. Instead of being hit so many times in each fire fight they should have emphasised suppression where the field of view gets fuzzy. For saying the game portrays the professionalism of the Forces America has to offer, the game makes you feel really dumb as the levels offer no vantage points, limited cover that actually covers you, limited arsenal and tactics when in fire fights let me throw a smoke grenade!!! The game just feels basic but still, I found myself strangely entertained by the many set pieces on offer. The sound of the bullets hitting enemies and the head shots are executed perfectly but the game just feels like a flurry of missed opportunities every time a new level or section starts. Weapons do feel meaty however but diversity isn't a strong point on weapon pick-ups...

    So far so bad right.... well not really as the single player was still an enjoyable romp but the shortcomings are so apparent it is hard to recommend at full price. I like what they have done with the driving sections as it breaks up the game, but different gameplay options like taking a stealth approach, being able to pick your load out, using some of the weaponry the armed forces has to offer (planes, tanks etc.), scouting for a partner sniper etc. This game just shouts "SAFE... WE PLAYED IT SAFE" every time you start it up.

    Multiplayer is where the values at. Offering up some intense and interesting, all be it, recycled game modes from the multiplayer arena, online is still hugely satisfying. The added feature of having a fire team buddy is great and me and a few friends have enjoyed numerous nights cleaning up levels by working effectively together. Maps are decent but nothing mind-blowing. Weapon customisation is great and adds depth and I think I'll be coming back to this for at least 6 months on and off.

    So all in all, single player wise, the game serves a story that has been written on a cigarette packet at lunchtime after a heavy night of drinking. A story of the good guys bringing down the bad guys whilst dealing with sub-story arc’s by adding the emotions of having a family, the death of close friends, trying to do the right thing and also dealing with a profession where it's either in your blood or not are good, acceptable story additions that most will enjoy. Multiplayer is where the meat is and offers up a great arena for some tense online battles. That's the value side, the single player offers good shooting practice before you enter online.

    The game is worth more than 35% and considering the other games that have achieved a higher score are rubbish, it makes no sense to me! I can clearly see that Warfighter was developed with love but maybe a lack of leadership, inexperience, budget problems, differing opinions within the team... make this feel rushed and sometimes awkward! But to rate this game at 35% is totally unacceptable. It's worth at least 60-70%...    … Expand
  23. Sinster
    Feb 21, 2013
    7
    I like this game and EA/Dice screwed the pooch on this one. It could of been handled better and should have been delayed instead of releasing a game that needed to be patched. Unfortunately they didn't patch it right away and it lost a lot of people. When they did release the patch. The patch didn't do much for what the community wanted. The devs stated on Battlelog forums that theyI like this game and EA/Dice screwed the pooch on this one. It could of been handled better and should have been delayed instead of releasing a game that needed to be patched. Unfortunately they didn't patch it right away and it lost a lot of people. When they did release the patch. The patch didn't do much for what the community wanted. The devs stated on Battlelog forums that they kept a lot of stuff in game that the community didn't like. That and the patch being released a few months after it was released was a little to late for damage control. This game could have been great.… Expand
  24. maike
    Feb 17, 2013
    5
    Poor by where you look. The only thing that saves him is the story. In everything else falls far short. Another disappointment of 2012!
    It brings something new, linear, tasteless.
    The game is not bad but lacked too rough filing.
  25. Lunatic4ever
    Feb 16, 2013
    6
    I was quite surprised by the quality of the shootouts in MOHWF. It felt really tense and real because A) the visuals are superb and B) the weapons feel real. The locations in the game look astonishing and it felt like these locations are real places with a sense of purpose. I played all of the recent COD titles and although COD is supported by a stronger budget, I think that the shootoutsI was quite surprised by the quality of the shootouts in MOHWF. It felt really tense and real because A) the visuals are superb and B) the weapons feel real. The locations in the game look astonishing and it felt like these locations are real places with a sense of purpose. I played all of the recent COD titles and although COD is supported by a stronger budget, I think that the shootouts itself aren't very tense. You pretty much run and gun most of the time while everything around you is exploding. Don't get me wrong, I enjoy that,too. But MOHWF has a very different and yet very solid foundation which hasn't been supported sufficiently. Instead of focusing on explosions (which COD clearly owns), focus on the intensity of firefights because with the help of the frostbite engine, superb sound and realisitic set pieces, this could be the war game for grown ups. I know they have paused the MOH series because it failed to sell. But it doesn't come as a suprise, it was advertised as yet another COD, the action scenes felt forced and the campaign is 5 hours long which is a shame. Refocus on the depiction of modern war in today's world and stick to realism and it should be a winner the next time around.… Expand
  26. Hellcatenstein
    Jan 28, 2013
    7
    I was looking forward to this game since they announced it. Anyone who played the last MoH knows how great the singleplayer is, and how bland the multiplayer was. This is what I was looking forward to: a solid, immersive singleplayer campaign. Unfortunately, besides the unusually well done vehicle levels, the singleplayer campaign is short and uninspiring. In fact, it felt like itI was looking forward to this game since they announced it. Anyone who played the last MoH knows how great the singleplayer is, and how bland the multiplayer was. This is what I was looking forward to: a solid, immersive singleplayer campaign. Unfortunately, besides the unusually well done vehicle levels, the singleplayer campaign is short and uninspiring. In fact, it felt like it shared too many things in common with the movie Act of Valor.

    The multiplayer is a lot of fun though. The gunplay is pretty solid, the weapon and soldier variety is pretty nice, and Fireteams make teamwork fun and rewarding. The game modes are nothing new, but that doesn't detract from the game itself. What modes it does have are fun and work well with the class mix.

    I wouldn't recommend the game, because it's really an acquired taste, but it is nowhere near the worst FPS I played last year.    … Expand
  27. stefanx
    Dec 1, 2012
    7
    I have been very pleased with the singleplayer part of the game, very good storyline, even the multiplayer part is great enough but i am so disappointed by EA help line, encountered some issues and needed help, well EA helpline as been the best of all in the recent years, now it is simply impossible to reach them, the online contact us doesn't work, the links to log in or request help areI have been very pleased with the singleplayer part of the game, very good storyline, even the multiplayer part is great enough but i am so disappointed by EA help line, encountered some issues and needed help, well EA helpline as been the best of all in the recent years, now it is simply impossible to reach them, the online contact us doesn't work, the links to log in or request help are broken, can't log in to get help. and now i just installed windows 8 and can't play online anymore as the platform is incompatible for online gaming. at least origin help line works and the fellow been able to explain this to me. thumbs up for origin, thumbs down for ea who were unable to get ready for the new windows and now seems to hide from us.… Expand
  28. H1TMAN930927
    Nov 22, 2012
    5
    Quick honest review, if a closed my eyes and some1 said this is the latest call of duty with new graphics, id beleive them, ......if you like call of duty campaigns you will like this, if your a battlefield 3 fan not so much..... But in my opinion its not worth buying , thats why piracy FTW!
  29. Greghome
    Nov 14, 2012
    5
    TBH, this sequel to the 2010 Medal of Honor is a huge let down, with the previous installment, we were presented with a somewhat more realistic and believable plot instead of chasing Arabs across the world to kill them in the Philippines ? The 2010 game presented more realistic scenarios, to have been marketed as the most realistic military shooter yet, I was expecting less hollywood andTBH, this sequel to the 2010 Medal of Honor is a huge let down, with the previous installment, we were presented with a somewhat more realistic and believable plot instead of chasing Arabs across the world to kill them in the Philippines ? The 2010 game presented more realistic scenarios, to have been marketed as the most realistic military shooter yet, I was expecting less hollywood and more tactical gameplay.

    Moving on to Gameplay, it's nothing more than BF3 without vehicles, so anyone with the former should just stick to TDM or Rush on it, instead of buying this one for the Multiplayer. And then there's the weird and stupid AI, not to mention watching your enemy popping out if you move too fast.

    Honestly, I think the reason for the letdown for me this time around, was the fact that I actually enjoyed the first modern MoH and owns BF3. If you're a COD fan, I doubt you'll buy this one instead of BO2 though, and if you're a BF fan, I think you'll be disappointed, so I really can't see who will buy this    … Expand
  30. HumanNervous
    Nov 11, 2012
    6
    Like a classic game in shooter category,but with usual typical scenario, without special scenes and action.For your personal play collection,play the game have fun and, that's all!
prev
Page:

Awards & Rankings

33
#33 Most Discussed PC Game of 2012
26
#26 Most Shared PC Game of 2012

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
55

Mixed or average reviews - based on 30 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1 out of 30
  2. Mixed: 23 out of 30
  3. Negative: 6 out of 30
  1. PC PowerPlay
    Dec 2, 2012
    30
    Plot holes, broken scripting and offensive self-contradiction makes Warfighter one of the worst games we've played all year. [Dec 2012, p.85]
  2. LEVEL (Czech Republic)
    Nov 30, 2012
    60
    Common military shooter with minor technical bugs shows all the elements we have seen before. We've expected much more from the legendary Medal of Honor series. [Dec 2012]
  3. CD-Action
    Nov 29, 2012
    50
    Due to unreliable scripts and other technical issues, bland and chaotic storytelling and stupid AI I played Warfighter strictly out of obligation and not for fun. Decent (but unbalanced) multiplayer is not enough to put other label than 'mediocre' on a game that was supposed to be a major hit. [13/2012, p.36]
See all critic reviews »