Medal of Honor: Airborne

 PC
User Score
7.2

Mixed or average reviews- based on 312 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 156 out of 312
  2. Mixed: 121 out of 312
  3. Negative: 35 out of 312
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. GabrielK.
    Mar 10, 2009
    8
    This game is a unique experience for me. The Gameplay is awesome, you can go anywhere in the map and complete the tasks in any order and of course you can land in any place of the map too. Like others Medal of Honor in the series, this one has a great soundtrack. The graphics are excelent, the locations, the planes, the soldiers, everything is very well done. The bad thing with this gameThis game is a unique experience for me. The Gameplay is awesome, you can go anywhere in the map and complete the tasks in any order and of course you can land in any place of the map too. Like others Medal of Honor in the series, this one has a great soundtrack. The graphics are excelent, the locations, the planes, the soldiers, everything is very well done. The bad thing with this game is the short campaign, only 6 missions so the game ends very fast. But the replay value in this game is high so you will want to do the missions again and again because is really fun and you can unlock upgrades for your weapons and win some medals to the collection.… Expand
  2. P_R_O_Z_A_C
    Aug 12, 2008
    8
    Better than expected! I read the reviews and ho-hummed about it, but I took the plunge and I'm not disappointed. Only criticism is that it doesn't support mouse smoothing (so fine aim is tricky) or anti aliasing, but then again I have a $20 el cheapo mouse... getting a better one soon. Possibly better replay value than COD4 in the single player game, being you can jump where youBetter than expected! I read the reviews and ho-hummed about it, but I took the plunge and I'm not disappointed. Only criticism is that it doesn't support mouse smoothing (so fine aim is tricky) or anti aliasing, but then again I have a $20 el cheapo mouse... getting a better one soon. Possibly better replay value than COD4 in the single player game, being you can jump where you want and complete the missions in different ways. Looks beautiful too. Underrated game - loads of fun!… Expand
  3. B.V.
    Oct 20, 2007
    9
    My best first taste of the U3 Engine, spectacular gameplay and pace. Some folks watch war movies to immerse themselves in the environments of WWII and gain a new respect for the men who devoted their lives to the ouster of oppression and facism... This is the first WWII game that did the same for me. This game is certainly worth playing.
  4. RobM.
    Sep 5, 2007
    9
    Excellent take on a tired genre. Not done with the whole game, but I loved what i played so far. Upgrade system, cover/duck system, and graphics all add new life to the old medal of honor franchise.
  5. CameronS.
    Sep 20, 2007
    9
    Ok, I realize this game has many issues: No clan tag support in multiplayer, not too solid Lobby screen, very long install, graphics card support issues). However, I realize that often times these things are overlooked and that is why, as has been mentioned by EA staff members, a patch is already underway and has been before the game was released based on beta comments. All this aside, Ok, I realize this game has many issues: No clan tag support in multiplayer, not too solid Lobby screen, very long install, graphics card support issues). However, I realize that often times these things are overlooked and that is why, as has been mentioned by EA staff members, a patch is already underway and has been before the game was released based on beta comments. All this aside, this game is great! To those who said it brought nothing to the WWII genre...are you kidding? Or maybe you haven't actually jumped out of a plane yet. With the option to parachute just about anywhere on the battlefield, it brings diversity to the game. But I guess you all like starting in the same point (wherever the last checkpoint you reached was). As for the sound...I have a decent 5.1 surround setup, but am using integrated mobo sound, and yet I STILL give the sound a 9. The sound of stones crumbling under your feet, wood creaking, parachute flapping and wind, bullets and yelling all in your face; what is not to like? As for the game play with respect to the realism aspect: yes the guns are not the most accurate. Let me remind you, its 1942, not 2142. And have any of you actually fired a 1945 U.S. Issued .45, or a Thompson? They kick like the devil! I will agree that the story line is not nearly as solid as one would except from the greatest war the world has ever seen. And as for the AI; I am not saying I am a world class FPS player, but i often had a bit of trouble pushing my way foreward and many times was saved by the duck and cover method. And for the graphics, well, if you want to play games in this new day and age of graphics/physics technology, you may need to step up your game and get a good card (or even a decent one like my Radeon X1950XT, it ain't the best but it plays the game on medium-to-medium-high superbly, makes the game look Amazing, and only cost about $200 now on NewEgg.) Overall this game is by far one of the better WWII games to be release in the last year and a half! Despite the problems, that will be fixed through an upcoming patch, you need to get this game!… Expand
  6. DanielvanN.
    Sep 11, 2007
    9
    The only complaint I have with this game is no multiplayer LAN support (yet). Hopefully it will be included in a patch. Other than that this game is incredibly fun to play. Great, smooth control; beautiful solid graphics; amazing sound; intense chaotic action. I was a bit surprised at first because I was used to MOHAA: Allied Assault's slow pace. Airborne is non-stop action all The only complaint I have with this game is no multiplayer LAN support (yet). Hopefully it will be included in a patch. Other than that this game is incredibly fun to play. Great, smooth control; beautiful solid graphics; amazing sound; intense chaotic action. I was a bit surprised at first because I was used to MOHAA: Allied Assault's slow pace. Airborne is non-stop action all through. I can honoustly recommend Airborne to anyone WWII FPS fan. Don't miss out!… Expand
  7. TS
    Sep 17, 2007
    9
    I found this game to be refreshing compared to the last MoH title I tried out (Pacific). Enemies took cover, used suppresing fire and out manuevered me. I spent some time just watching the allies and axis clash through the binoculars. Its amazing to see AI acting so lifelike. Now, there are problems (Hence the 9 rather then 10). There are a few bugs in the MP system and the first few I found this game to be refreshing compared to the last MoH title I tried out (Pacific). Enemies took cover, used suppresing fire and out manuevered me. I spent some time just watching the allies and axis clash through the binoculars. Its amazing to see AI acting so lifelike. Now, there are problems (Hence the 9 rather then 10). There are a few bugs in the MP system and the first few levels of the game are a joke. The system where you redrop instead of having to load a new game is interesting and allows for the "special" drops, but doesn't really help with realism. The medal system for firearms is fun, trying to get each gun up to the top is not too challenging, but being stupid enough to charge a pillbox with a pistol provides for some crazy moments. I wish they added more weapon customization and did more to make a story out of the game. I felt no connection to my squad mates like I did in CoD. One of the most interesting parts of this game was aiming down the sights. The gun bucks and moves like it would in real-life, but more importantly there are a few more options for taking cover. You can't move, but you can duck, stand, and bend either direction without having a seperate set of keys. EA, put out more titles like this, please.… Expand
  8. DanteTheCynic
    Jul 1, 2013
    8
    An underrated gem, truly. The action is intense, and aside from the occasional framerate chug, I found no technical issues at all. Definitely worth a playthrough, Maybe even two!
  9. Diego1390
    Dec 15, 2012
    8
    One of the best games of the WWII who has played, how bad was the escazes campaign missions (only about 6). Good multiplayer maps with large and that to modify your weapons to guerra.Good graphics comparison of Call of Duty 3
  10. tangosucka
    Jun 8, 2016
    8
    a few short years back i used to play the hell out of medal of honor airborne, i considered it to be a great edition to the series, but picking it up last year and playing it after so long uncovered all the flaws the game really has, first of all, the campaign, its way too short, the medal of honor games were known for their huge campaigns and amazing levels, although the level design ina few short years back i used to play the hell out of medal of honor airborne, i considered it to be a great edition to the series, but picking it up last year and playing it after so long uncovered all the flaws the game really has, first of all, the campaign, its way too short, the medal of honor games were known for their huge campaigns and amazing levels, although the level design in airborne is alright, and the campaign still delivers a great experience, with the player jumping out of plane and controlling their descent to the ground via parachute, but airborne feels more like dlc than a full priced game, no thanks to its sort length, the multiplayer mode is also a miserable experience, although it works for the most part, i kept spawning right next to enemy players and getting killed 3 seconds into the game, this frustration caused me to leave the game thereafter, aside from that, the multiplayer's other features seem to work just fine, another problem with this game i had were the weapons, the american weapons have insane amounts of recoil and can be impossible to control unless you have unlocked all the weapon upgrades, the graphics although chunky now, are alright for an early 7th gen console game, the pc version might look a bit pathetic to some players though and the animation is incredibly choppy though, the gameplay is relatively fun for the most part, with upgrade options for weapons that are unlocked in game depending on how many enemies you have killed, and there is a fair amount of challenge which either keeps you on your feet or ducking behind cover, the medals return from previous medal of honor games return, you unlock medals in the campaign and its unknown what you have to do to get them, and unlike previous moh games, you can customize your load-out before each mission, overall, medal of honor airborne, is okay for the most part, definitely not the amazing game i thought it was when i was 14, but definitely not a bad game either, i would recommend checking it out, its available on pc, xbox 360, and ps3… Expand
  11. art4321
    Oct 18, 2014
    10
    Best WW2 game eveeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeer
  12. debeluhi123
    Jan 14, 2015
    9
    The graphics are beautiful the gameplay is amazing it is a little bit hard but its amazing the ai is not that stupid and i think you need to buy it or download it
  13. sdfgwsdf
    Sep 6, 2007
    10
    Probably the best WW2 game in the recent years.
  14. Canamavrick
    Jan 10, 2011
    8
    I had a lot of fun with this game. The only problem is that its a short game and that you can't move your guy while you are aiming. Overall this is a great game.
  15. mASTERbLASTER1
    Nov 21, 2011
    10
    In my humble opinion, this is the best WWII era first person game ever. It avoids the "on rails" style of the COD series, which gives it nearly limitless replayability, as the open world approach really plays out different depending on how you approach the battles. Fantastic AI, sound effects, weapons, with tons of cool touches like motion blur/shake while running-very realistic.
  16. RoleH
    Sep 16, 2008
    5
    Another great flop from the once great moh franchise. Sadly this game should have been great with the freedom to tackle missions from many angles and vantage points, such as ledges and platforms.

    However there are some major failings in this title. The first is the clumsy control system - it feels cumbersome and out dated. Second is the pitiful hit box detection - you can see you    Another great flop from the once great moh franchise. Sadly this game should have been great with the freedom to tackle missions from many angles and vantage points, such as ledges and platforms.

    However there are some major failings in this title. The first is the clumsy control system - it feels cumbersome and out dated.
    Second is the pitiful hit box detection - you can see you have a clear headshot (even with a sniper rifle) and low and behold you still miss - often.
    Third is the fact that the enemy soldiers all appear to be psychic. No matter where you attack or flank from, the enemy always know your there. And its only you they aim for - they will ignore your buddy in front of them to shoot at you even when your miles from them. Also they don't seem to have dodgy hit box problems - they will hit you even if its just your elbow toes poking out!

    Finally the last problem is the sheer repetitiveness of the task in hand. Kill x number of enemy then blow something up. It seems only you were trained in explosives out of the entire US army in WW2.
    On the plus side the graphics and sound are great, and there is some fun to be had out of exploring the maps, however you may find this very short lived entertainment once the real gameplay flaws kick in.
    Really unless your a diehard WW2 junkie this game adds very little to the genre, and there are far superior FPS out there.    … Expand
  17. WS
    Sep 5, 2007
    10
    Great game! I really enjoyed dropping into the open environment. This one of the best games of the year so far.
  18. TerryD.
    Sep 14, 2007
    9
    I'd give this game a 10, but that's reserved for titles like Halo, Half-life 2, Far Cry, etc. But it
  19. JakeL.
    Sep 6, 2007
    10
    It's very realistic. it's very cool game.
  20. JimM.
    Oct 19, 2007
    7
    Overall I find this game to be challenging and fun. There are a few 'strange' AI quirks. If you are a fan of WWII first person shooters, you'll probably enjoy this game. I'd love to know how much better the game looks with the Physx card.
  21. ChrisH.
    Sep 8, 2007
    10
    I was wondering whether to give this title a 10. It
  22. oscy999
    Oct 5, 2014
    10
    This game is one of my favorite games I have ever played. I played it over and over again so much that I finally sold it thinking that I would never play it again, and about a year later I couldn't help myself I saw it and bought it again and I NEVER do that....that's how good this game is. It is really fun being able to land wherever you want on the map and do objectives in whatever orderThis game is one of my favorite games I have ever played. I played it over and over again so much that I finally sold it thinking that I would never play it again, and about a year later I couldn't help myself I saw it and bought it again and I NEVER do that....that's how good this game is. It is really fun being able to land wherever you want on the map and do objectives in whatever order you want to do them. I thought that was cool, but what gets lost in the uniqueness of this game is how great the gameplay is. The crouching behind cover and leaning out to shoot or snipe is done better than any game I can think of, this is the only game that gets it right. It does not have very many missions but you can play them all so differently each time that the replay value is awesome, and your weapon upgrades come with how much you use that weapon, it doesn't automatically upgrade all you weapons for beating a mission, if you are good with the pistol it will upgrade itself the more kills you get with it, and its that way for all the weapons. Also, there are some difficult parts and it can be a challenge, so I give this awesome game a 10, I just wish Medal of Honor would do another one instead of pumping out lesser games like warfighter and stuff.....… Expand
  23. CameronC.
    Nov 3, 2007
    2
    The medal of honor series is dead. I am so sick of these games coming out. They are all the same and yes, there are better WWII games out there that are more fun to play. Dont buy this game. It is not worth it.
  24. MikePushkin
    Apr 22, 2011
    6
    Medal of Honor: Airborne (MOH:A) consists of 6 missions tightly packed with action and some interesting ideas - like you being able to drop with the parachute almost at any position of the map you can reach, checkpoint saving using which you will drop with parachute again but you'll save your progress and realistically behaving weapons and sounds of gunfire. In a way it is kind of aMedal of Honor: Airborne (MOH:A) consists of 6 missions tightly packed with action and some interesting ideas - like you being able to drop with the parachute almost at any position of the map you can reach, checkpoint saving using which you will drop with parachute again but you'll save your progress and realistically behaving weapons and sounds of gunfire. In a way it is kind of a sandbox shooter, where you are allowed to do tasks one at a time and then start doing something else, but in any order you desire. So, you have to destroy Flak Cannons, Enemy tanks and secure the strategic building - you do it your way, paving your path the way you want it. In MOH:A there are about 10 to 15 weapons, including M1926 Thompson, Colt M1911, Kar98k, Gewehr 43, Mauser C712 and several others, which all have 3 levels of upgrades, each unlocking minor upgrade for the weapon. Very nice, exluding the fact, that some of these upgrades break the weapon absolutely! Take G43 - first upgrade is high-capacity mag (20 instead of 10), then its optics and after - GRENADE LAUNCHER... Why would I need my sniper rifle to become a GL? Not only previous two upgrades become useless but the GL itself is much less effective than thrown grenade! Add to this several bugs in which you stuck in interior and exterior and you get somewhat interesting at first, but very buggy game, which will hardly stay on your HDD for long.… Expand
  25. Shika
    Jul 1, 2012
    5
    This game is all around just mediocre, from the characters to the story to the gunplay. The gun assortment is fairly small however they mostly feel different from eachother, but the upgrade system is very weak and feels so dated. The upgrades consist of grips, launchers, extended mags, and scopes. The airdropping is a nice touch, but really being able to land anywhere is such a small partThis game is all around just mediocre, from the characters to the story to the gunplay. The gun assortment is fairly small however they mostly feel different from eachother, but the upgrade system is very weak and feels so dated. The upgrades consist of grips, launchers, extended mags, and scopes. The airdropping is a nice touch, but really being able to land anywhere is such a small part of each mission as you're still going to go to the SAME position each time, it just gives you a chance to choose a starting point really. The AI is alright, however your friendly units are a disaster most of the time, they seem to want to just melee and get in your way. Enemy units seem to be balanced, they will notice you from long distances but they aren't insanely easy or difficult, and the game is overall easy on expert, besides the completely random panzerschrek and MG nest deaths which can be extremely annoying. Story is forgettable, the one thing they did well was the jump scenes in the beginning of each level and the locations, historically it's pretty accurate on its objectives and even the weather. Other than that there is no real story, just the briefings and jumps, it feels pretty bland. In terms of length, the mission count isn't the problem, it's the tediousness, every mission feels the same. The combat is decent, but ruined by clipping problems. I don't know whether the weapons are inaccurate or the hit detection is messed up, but a lot of times you won't hit your target when you're dead on. Nothing special, would get a 6 if it had better combat but as is it gets a 5, I'd recommend you not to buy it… Expand
  26. SimonF
    Nov 8, 2008
    1
    Worst WW2 shooter ever!
    Totally Unrealistic, Arcade and Naff!
    Silly 'Shiny Buttons' and pathetic unrealistic upgrades...and what on earth is with the 'end of game' Nazi Thug who's impossible to Kill? EA Brought us the fantastic FPS WW2 shooter series of MOHAA.. thanks for that Guys!... But sadly, you have completely lost the plot with this Joke of a    Worst WW2 shooter ever!
    Totally Unrealistic, Arcade and Naff!
    Silly 'Shiny Buttons' and pathetic unrealistic upgrades...and what on earth is with the 'end of game' Nazi Thug who's impossible to Kill?

    EA Brought us the fantastic FPS WW2 shooter series of MOHAA.. thanks for that Guys!... But sadly, you have completely lost the plot with this Joke of a game!...You started the Genre, but Ubisoft have totally killed you with their Hells Highway!!

    Stick to Golf Sims!    … Expand
  27. [Anonymous]
    Sep 7, 2007
    0
    Since they didn't bother supporting shader 2.0, even a solid, fairly new card like the x800 cannot run the game. Many MOH fans will be upset when they get the game home and find out it won't run on their system. The quality of the graphics is high, but no more than a game like Oblivion. Only supporting a few high end cards is bound to come back and bite them.
  28. SeanE.
    Sep 10, 2007
    4
    I purchased this game based on the MetaCritic rating of 80 on September 9, 2007. I have played several World War II first person shooters including but not limited to, Call of Duty and Battlefield. This game "Medal of Honour Airborne" is a very low quality game compared to the above noted games. I wasted CDN$54 on this game, I played it for an hour and realized quickly that it is just a I purchased this game based on the MetaCritic rating of 80 on September 9, 2007. I have played several World War II first person shooters including but not limited to, Call of Duty and Battlefield. This game "Medal of Honour Airborne" is a very low quality game compared to the above noted games. I wasted CDN$54 on this game, I played it for an hour and realized quickly that it is just a company putting out junk-software to make money. Send Electronic Arts (EA) a message -- DON'T BUY IT!!! --… Expand
  29. bob
    Sep 6, 2007
    0
    installation is buggy, and this is being nice...still not loaded after 4 hours. ea shot itself in the foot. ea forums is alittle help for some, but i am still waiting. I haven't had this much trouble, since win 95, or win 3.1.
    i will review again after loading is acomplished.
  30. CK
    Sep 9, 2007
    4
    Some nice new graphics and gameplay ideas. The unfortunate thing is that the game itself feels very unpolished. No, PC games are not released perfect. But this one has one of the most pathetic Online lobbies I have ever seen. Many times after a match it drops you back into the Front end menu instead of the MP menu. Bugs are all over the place (Such as Holing 'E' does not always Some nice new graphics and gameplay ideas. The unfortunate thing is that the game itself feels very unpolished. No, PC games are not released perfect. But this one has one of the most pathetic Online lobbies I have ever seen. Many times after a match it drops you back into the Front end menu instead of the MP menu. Bugs are all over the place (Such as Holing 'E' does not always pick up the weapon advertised) and there is no name creation or even clan tag option. Seems like there is a lot of potential that now will be left to a long chain of promised patches that may or may not come. I don't think this is acceptable anymore. You might want to read about the game on the EA Forums before spending your money.… Expand
  31. RobertJ.
    Sep 9, 2007
    5
    Nothing new, graphics are not as impressive as I expected and it runs poorly on my not so old gaming rig. AI is eratic and enemy movement is choppy.
  32. IanM.
    Nov 10, 2007
    5
    I hate giving games a low score but I think that this game is fundamentally flawed. There are some great things about this game. The duck and shooting. The recovering health after you get shot. When you shoot the enemy they figure out where you are at in the battle. The Italian mission which I think is the most fun mission of the entire game. That said here are some things that bother me. I hate giving games a low score but I think that this game is fundamentally flawed. There are some great things about this game. The duck and shooting. The recovering health after you get shot. When you shoot the enemy they figure out where you are at in the battle. The Italian mission which I think is the most fun mission of the entire game. That said here are some things that bother me. The game is kinda glitchy. You can tell the EA released the game in a rush. There are pieces of the map that look like a clipping problem. Anyone familiar with the days of Doom will know what I mean. Enemy soldiers don't act like a intelligent group. Although fun it gets kinda old to blow off someones head and then have man after man replace the last one. You have scattered body piles around the battlefield and I'm no history buff but I doubt that Germans fell in piles on the WWII battlefield. Next the sniper rifle is maddening. If there is a fence in the way the bullet hole will appear floating in space on the fence. in front of the German! I sometimes have to fire many times to kill a enemy soldier even though it looks like I have a clear head shot! Lastly the most frustrating part of the whole game is the save system. I know that EA probably did this so that it would be more realistic. But If I wanted realism I would play Call of Duty and get my head blown off. How do they justify saving in the middle of the mission as unrealistic while you are picking up medikits and ammo pack conveniently situated thru each level!? This checkpoint save system sucks. It really does. First you have to trigger a specific checkpoint to save to that level. If you get an early checkpoint no dice. You get to parachute in again. yah. The level I played today I made it through 80% of the level and was killed. I restarted at the point I was at and then in the latter half i was shot dead by a German Sniper. Where do I start? Again the stupid parachute! After I had 2-3 upgrades on my guns! So I nearly finish the level and I have to do it all again. This one flaw takes so much fun and excitement away from the game. You can be duking in out in an intense firefight and boom you die and jump out of an airplane again! I don't even play after that I quit the game and exit. This is the one flaw that will stop people from ever wanting to finish out the game to 100%. I know after I win I will take the game and onto the shelf it will go.. EA needs to insist on a large level of play testing with these MOH games.… Expand
  33. BadDad
    Sep 3, 2007
    6
    Based on the SinglePlayer demo - Nice graphics and about right gameplay but Multiplayer was an afterthought and only a few maps which will get old soon. You can only climb with stairs, boxes or ladders so vertical play is mostly one-way (down) and even with airpdrop into game the game still feels linear and controled. With so many new FPS coming out soon, won't get my $50US.
  34. Avs'Judgement
    Sep 7, 2007
    6
    Heres a real review, unlike some of the fanboys out here (that includes you critics who rated bioshock at 97). The good: Its a new WWII game that delivers the experience of paradroping onto a map filled with objectives to complete. Thats about it, just a new experience, but nothing new to the genre. The sound SFX. Bad: They said they had the most advanced AI. Wrong, these paratroopers are Heres a real review, unlike some of the fanboys out here (that includes you critics who rated bioshock at 97). The good: Its a new WWII game that delivers the experience of paradroping onto a map filled with objectives to complete. Thats about it, just a new experience, but nothing new to the genre. The sound SFX. Bad: They said they had the most advanced AI. Wrong, these paratroopers are not even 1/100th of your skill level, they block you, and often melee enemies. They might as well be meatshields, as there are unlimited supplies of paratroopers for you. The enemy's AI is weak at most, they just use cover and shoot at you in predictable patterns. Rushing you when they have numbers is stupid as you just mow them down. They also tend to move up once you stop moving and thus allowing you to cut them down when they walk around corners like idiots. The hardest difficultly barely makes this game challenging, the shortness of having only 6 levels is laughable. The customization of weapons is cheap, like bioshock's, you get it when you level a weapon up by using it repeatedly. You cant actually make it non linear by choosing a landing spot. The medal system is weak as half the time you cant "earn your wings" as otherwise you have to repeatedly drop into the zone into the special landing areas. Hit detection is horrible, recoil is horrible (but that didnt stop me from headshotting everything). Yet another game that could have redefined the FPS genre like Bioshock but fails to do it by a lot. And of course, its lacking a solid storyline to save its own butt. But I said that about bioshock as well, as its story could have been good, but was paper thin.… Expand
  35. proamericanneoconservative
    Sep 8, 2007
    7
    I find 3 problems. 1) the whole idea of dropping in to an enemy controlled territory... they didnt do a good job. its just another run and gun, no differend from COD. The games AI isnt magnificent either, making the duck and cover system kinda pointless. Lets put it this way; if you kill 50 people in about 10 minutes, theres a problem with the game. its just not realistic. 2) its almost I find 3 problems. 1) the whole idea of dropping in to an enemy controlled territory... they didnt do a good job. its just another run and gun, no differend from COD. The games AI isnt magnificent either, making the duck and cover system kinda pointless. Lets put it this way; if you kill 50 people in about 10 minutes, theres a problem with the game. its just not realistic. 2) its almost no different from all ofther WWII FPS's. cmon. go here, kill some nazis that arent really a chalange, blow up some tanks with stickybombs (i swear to god. one more game where i kill a tank with a stickybomb and ill go fuckin crazy) then, levels end. If it made the reall soldier experience, doing patrols, walking around, it would be quite intresting. some might conciter it dull, but it would be VERY relistic. 3) weapons. always a problem in WWII FPS's. they just arent accurate. I realize its a minor complant, but a Kar wouldn't reload just by manual reloading; charger clips would b used. if they dont change the goddamn thompson, ill be pissed. seriously, be norman and use a fuckin M1A1, not just an M1. otherwise, its pretty much the average WWII game. the airborne part is fun, but doesnt add much (ohh, i landed on a rooftop. extreme!). very recomended to people who have never played a FPS. of course, youre omish if youve never played a FPS.… Expand
  36. BrianG.
    Sep 9, 2007
    6
    Jumpstart of the MoH franchise shows promise with improved AI and an open environment, but ultimately falls short with installation issues and a disappointing multiplayer that is DOA at release.
  37. Hollika
    Feb 2, 2013
    4
    In the beginning I found it pretty good and realistic, but at the end it just became funny. Germans are running around with Panzercheck and MG-42 and reloading at a speed of like 3 seconds, not to mention the guy with the MG-42 even resists grenades for like two times. Also the missions where you have to destroy tanks are again just funny. A normal person would go and search for a bazookaIn the beginning I found it pretty good and realistic, but at the end it just became funny. Germans are running around with Panzercheck and MG-42 and reloading at a speed of like 3 seconds, not to mention the guy with the MG-42 even resists grenades for like two times. Also the missions where you have to destroy tanks are again just funny. A normal person would go and search for a bazooka to destroy the tank with, but no... not a single of it anywhere so instead lets just toss grenades at the tank until it gets destroyed. Other than these the game was actually playable. I liked how they kept the health bar function in the game and the weapon upgrades just makes more achievements for the player. 'Nuf said.… Expand
  38. iddqd4
    Mar 16, 2018
    7
    このテキストは私のプロフィールにスコアが表示されるようにここにあります。
  39. northerndark
    Dec 27, 2013
    1
    one of the worst shooters i've ever played. the reason is;

    there is no sense of hitting. you don't get that feeling of "ok i've shot him". i remember while i was playing wolfenstein (2009), the overall feeling the guns deadliness and their effects on enemies was amazing. but in this game, guns are like toys and their accurasies are like "non existent". and yes, i've played until    one of the worst shooters i've ever played. the reason is;

    there is no sense of hitting. you don't get that feeling of "ok i've shot him".

    i remember while i was playing wolfenstein (2009), the overall feeling the guns deadliness and their effects on enemies was amazing. but in this game, guns are like toys and their accurasies are like "non existent". and yes, i've played until chapter 5 and their accuracies were upgraded.

    so, what do you expect from a shooter at the first place? the feeling that you "shoot" someone, right? well, this game has none.    … Expand
  40. AstiX
    Dec 8, 2020
    6
    Single-player review only

    I guess it's a fun little war shooter to kill some time with for a while despite its annoying bugs like getting stuck, weapon disappearing and people flying away.
  41. Tomle1202
    Jan 23, 2022
    6
    Airborne's combination of choppy port quality, cheap enemy design and questionable control severely roughens its landing.
  42. jalu
    Mar 14, 2017
    0
    Hardest game i've ever played,checkpoint to checkpoint is so far.Im get stuck on chapter 2 and im playing on normal mode i have changed to casual but still Hard
  43. Axilley
    Jul 22, 2021
    8
    good good good good good good good good good good good good good good good good good good good good legend moh
  44. gold
    Jan 4, 2019
    10
    Для меня эта будет лучшей частью в серии по геймплейной составляющей. Класс. Мне нравится цель по типу "полностью очистить карту".
    Итог:10/10
  45. Kotofon
    Sep 12, 2021
    7
    Игроку предстоит сражаться с войсками вермахта руками бравого американского десантника рядового Бойда Трэвэрса бойца 82-й дивизии. Airborne содержит 7 миссий, одна из которых представляет собой обучение.
  46. Cz3rw0ny
    Apr 5, 2021
    8
    The game made a very good impression on me in 2007 - I thought that the graphics are gorgeous.
  47. Genek13
    Nov 19, 2019
    9
    For me this is the second best installment after Allied Assault.
    Freedom of choosing a path on every math is great.
    Also visuals at the time was outstanding.
  48. AMBO
    Feb 17, 2020
    7
    07/10......................................................................
  49. Gorbunov2004
    Mar 26, 2021
    5
    Задумка у игры конечно хорошая но реализация хромает. Стрельба из винтовок отвратительная невозможно убить в голову только если случайно, ИИ интеллект очень тупой, когда я иду в атаку и стреляю во врагов за укрытием сзади мои "напарники" пропускают ко мне в спину врагов. Они у меня за всю игру не убили не одного врага я всех убивал. Прыжки с самолёта конечно круто но приземление тупое наЗадумка у игры конечно хорошая но реализация хромает. Стрельба из винтовок отвратительная невозможно убить в голову только если случайно, ИИ интеллект очень тупой, когда я иду в атаку и стреляю во врагов за укрытием сзади мои "напарники" пропускают ко мне в спину врагов. Они у меня за всю игру не убили не одного врага я всех убивал. Прыжки с самолёта конечно круто но приземление тупое на ноги приземляешься тебе пишет неудачное приземление и ты снимаешь парашют пол минуты.… Expand
  50. RockerKR
    Nov 17, 2020
    7
    Good Game lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
  51. JohnoDeruno
    Jan 26, 2022
    5
    Attention: That's just my opinion!

    Medal of Honor: Airborne - Bruh! My experience in Single-player, Hard mode. The game surprised me with a few game mechanics and physics, and how it shows war plans. The game doesn't have a very big story, it's just a game story about WW2 Americans vs. Germans and a few events based on real war events and America is pushing the Germans back. The    Attention: That's just my opinion!

    Medal of Honor: Airborne - Bruh!

    My experience in Single-player, Hard mode. The game surprised me with a few game mechanics and physics, and how it shows war plans. The game doesn't have a very big story, it's just a game story about WW2 Americans vs. Germans and a few events based on real war events and America is pushing the Germans back. The gameplay isn't that much fun in an action game, but the bottom line is that you accomplish objectives like blowing things up and killing the Nazis, that's it.
    The game has such **** progress and I don't think it's needed in such a game, the progress is like playing and killing the Nazis, you get such medals and your weapons get upgrades stats or attachments, and you get those attachments that can't be removed! So bad. I really enjoyed the game’s mechanics and physics as weapons and sound effect. In the game, I enjoyed how the captain showed how the mission and objectives would begin.

    Level design is so bad and boring that on some levels you can't even play nice because some enemy rushing too quickly, and you get in ambush. AI very bad, enemies behave so dumb, they are moving fast, rushing, doing some **** very bad, some enemy shooting you bad, some shooting very good. The graphics are very awkward, very blurry and uncomfortable, most textures look cardboard.

    The game have a lot of bug's and thing's, maybe I played first version, but the game so broken it's funny and awkward. I didn't really like the game being so short, about 3 - 4 hours of gameplay, that's it. Some things, I really like it, but the game is not worth at all. I would rate this game 5/10.    … Expand
  52. frederik1478
    Jun 12, 2022
    4
    Middle of honour airborne is a create an awesome game in the start of it, but in the last two levels, they throw basuka wearing Nazis at you. Nazis was so annoying to fight that I gave up and just had to do something else. I completed the game but f** Christ it was not fun. I hate the last part of the game.
  53. SewAwOw
    Aug 20, 2022
    7
    Максимально стандартный, проходной шутер по Второй Мировой. В нем ни голливудской постановки колды, ни больших карт как в баттлфилде. Сюжет стандартен для таких игр, сделан чисто для галочки и вообще не откладывается в памяти. Графика для 2007 неплохая, но не поражает. Геймплейно это тир с отстрелом сотен врагов, некоторое разнообразие вносит большой размер локаций и возможность высадки вМаксимально стандартный, проходной шутер по Второй Мировой. В нем ни голливудской постановки колды, ни больших карт как в баттлфилде. Сюжет стандартен для таких игр, сделан чисто для галочки и вообще не откладывается в памяти. Графика для 2007 неплохая, но не поражает. Геймплейно это тир с отстрелом сотен врагов, некоторое разнообразие вносит большой размер локаций и возможность высадки в самостоятельно выбранное место, но стратегически это мало на что влияет, зайти врагам за спину не получится, они сразу переключаются на игрока. У стволов есть уровни прокачки, что немного странно видеть в такой игре, они дают различные бонусы оружию, которого здесь немало и ощущается оно хорошо. Продолжительность кампании очень короткая, всего 6 миссий, которые проходятся за 5 часов, реиграбельность низкая.
    В общем и целом, ознакомиться можно, если соскучились по шутанам времен ВМВ.    … Expand
  54. vova22379
    Jul 17, 2022
    1
    ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
  55. DonldTrump_45Th
    Jan 26, 2023
    7
    Hello, this is a default review because i'm forced to use 75 characters. I'll edit this review in the future talking about the game, don't worry ;)

    My final rate is: 7
  56. Baidenpidor
    Apr 22, 2022
    0
    TrashTrashTrashTrashTrashTrashTrashTrashTrashTrashTrashTrashTrashTrashTrashTrashTrash
  57. The_D4RknesS
    Jul 16, 2022
    9
    POSITIVE
    physics so realistic it feels natural when soldiers diE You can do whatever objective you want as the missions are not lineaR. It has classic MOH music like FRONTLINE


    NEGATIVE

    Campaign mode is short as ****
  58. FoxCritic
    Jul 11, 2022
    8
    Medal of Honor: Airborne is a great Medal of Honor. As in all Medal of Honor games, it makes you feel like a hero while passing through the horrors of war. The plot of the game is really good, Boyd Travers is a really well made character, and the game just feels like a paratrooper Saving Private Ryan. Action-packed missions like Husky, Neptune, Market Garden.... Plus the themes fromMedal of Honor: Airborne is a great Medal of Honor. As in all Medal of Honor games, it makes you feel like a hero while passing through the horrors of war. The plot of the game is really good, Boyd Travers is a really well made character, and the game just feels like a paratrooper Saving Private Ryan. Action-packed missions like Husky, Neptune, Market Garden.... Plus the themes from previous Medal of Honor games feels like a great touch. However, the game is very short, but it definitely sums up what a Medal of Honor is.… Expand
  59. Marinusf
    Sep 1, 2022
    7
    Graphics are not great and the gameplay is repetitive because the levels are hard you have to keep repeating them.
  60. renyw
    Dec 19, 2022
    8
    great great great great great great great great great great great great great
  61. Suprizer
    Sep 7, 2023
    5
    A game of my childhood, i remember enjoy this game really much and feeling immersion etc. Replaying it 2023 wasn't a mistake i still enjoyed, still playable today but wasn't as good as i remembed as a kid.
  62. sergioOoOoOo
    Sep 1, 2023
    3
    Basura de juego todo roto y lleno de bugs ni parecido a la obra de MOH ALLIED ASSAULT parece que fuera un juego de otra empresa osea te llegan balas estando cubierto, los NPC claramente apuntan a tus compañeros sin embargo aun asi te llegan disparon, son spiquicos porque saben hasta donde estas sin siquera mostrarte ni disparar, cuando los matas se quedan levitando en fin un desastre

Awards & Rankings

53
#53 Best PC Game of 2007
31
#31 Most Discussed PC Game of 2007
23
#23 Most Shared PC Game of 2007

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
78

Generally favorable reviews - based on 38 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 26 out of 38
  2. Mixed: 12 out of 38
  3. Negative: 0 out of 38
  1. PC Zone UK
    83
    It rewards a determination to enjoy what it has to offer. But equally, the game's finer moments could equally pass people by. [Oct 2007, p.56]
  2. PC Gamer
    88
    This latest Medal of Honor proves to be the best of the series, and one of the deepest and most challenging World War II shooters I've ever played. [Nov 2007, p.68]
  3. PC Gamer UK
    88
    We've seen wide open singleplayer FPS games before, but they've never had this pace or this lust for physical player freedom where every building and every rooftop has been designed to work like a bullet playground. [Oct 2007, p.68]
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »