Glacier 3: The Meltdown

 PC
User Score
2.6

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 10 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2 out of 10
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 10
  3. Negative: 8 out of 10

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. GamesFanXXI
    Jan 24, 2014
    0
    Don't waste even your 1 dollar on this game. No manual, no option to see Key Bindings (Controls) in the game's menu, no option to adjust screen resolution. Ugly graphics, terrible game. I deleted this game after 5 minutes of playing this one.
  2. AfBu
    Jul 7, 2014
    1
    I have to define this game as not good at all. I will not judge graphics, this is just not fun to play. You race car with weapon against other cars with weapons, that alone is not fun and this is only thing this game can offer. Levels are badly designed, physics engine is very simple and provides only frustration when you do something that it can't handle, like crash into anything static,I have to define this game as not good at all. I will not judge graphics, this is just not fun to play. You race car with weapon against other cars with weapons, that alone is not fun and this is only thing this game can offer. Levels are badly designed, physics engine is very simple and provides only frustration when you do something that it can't handle, like crash into anything static, opponents are just stupid. There is no story, no challenge, no multiplayer, no settings, no motivation. Just frustration and having no fun at all.… Expand
  3. Loxnaka
    Nov 6, 2015
    0
    I have now decided. I'm going to play sonic 06 for the rest of my life instead. or maybe assassins creed unity instead or possibly anything better than this... I got it. I'm gonna go watch some food fight.
  4. BlueCatPK
    Feb 13, 2017
    1
    Typical racing game where instead of skill, you have rely on weapons and speed boosts to get ahead.
    The idea itself is ok. Actually, that would be my favourite type of racing game, but everything that could go wrong, does.
    The controls and physics, the most important things in a racing game, are just horrible. It's not about them being unrealistic, they didn't have to, nor did I wanted    Typical racing game where instead of skill, you have rely on weapons and speed boosts to get ahead.
    The idea itself is ok. Actually, that would be my favourite type of racing game, but everything that could go wrong, does.
    The controls and physics, the most important things in a racing game, are just horrible. It's not about them being unrealistic, they didn't have to, nor did I wanted them to be realistic; I just wanted to actually being able to control my car.
    The car just flies across the screen, spinning uncontrollably, hitting every obstacle in the way and literally flying in all directions. There's no weight in it, and also, the game isn't really punishing you for hitting walls or even mines set by the other racers, so all you have to, and can do, is just float forward at full speed, and hope for the best.
    The tracks, other very important thing in racing game, are boring and unimaginative, to the point that you can't really distinguish one part of the level from another (besides one part of the caves... too bad, the rest of it is just one long corridor with nothing in it.)
    Not to mention they even reusing the tracks in the campaign (to prolong it I assume,) which you have to complete, in order to unlock anything else. Normally I wouldn't mind unlocking stuff by playing the game, but when the game is that tedious, it's just bothersome.
    Even if it would be for free, I wouldn't recommend playing this game.
    To think that after creating this, they somehow acquired right to make FlatOut sequel... It just baffles me.    … Expand