User Score
Mixed or average reviews- based on 187 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 99 out of 187
-
Mixed: 44 out of 187
-
Negative: 44 out of 187
Buy Now
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
Apr 13, 2023If you want to play a casual Modern Military First Person Shooter, then this is one of the best! They mix their gameplay formula from other successful games to give you variety and options. Plus it's a cheesy story about World War 3.
-
Dec 6, 2022weak game and what makes it even worse is the accuracy of the weapons that can be worse than MOH WARFIGHT
-
Mar 29, 2017
-
Apr 12, 2016GOOD: Excellent game play, excellent variety of situations that keep you entertaining, love the variety of vehicles, very funy to play
BAD: Artificial intelligence not very intelligent, enemies sometime just re-spawn from nowhere, not very polished gameplay -
Nov 13, 2013This review is about the sigle player as I don't play much in the way of multiplayer. The game mechanic is certainly good enough but there is precisely zero storyline. The music and sound effects are good but a bit.... well... let's put it this way... if Call of Duty isn't "AMERICA FK YEAH" enough for you then this game is probably for you.
-
Nov 13, 2013
-
Aug 27, 2013I love this game despite the fact that it looks like a futuristic battlefield game that was never made. Worth your cash and the fun factor is huge here.
-
Jul 7, 2013
-
Jun 12, 2012This game looks like than Battlefield 2142. What you need is only capture or destroy points and devices. Short singleplayer, 3-4 hours long. The AI and enemy spawning are bad. Storyline is sucks. The graphisc in 2012 looks ugly.
-
Apr 22, 2012Not a bad game, sadly on new Hardware/Software system it act weirds, still if you have some money to spend and want to give it a try go on, story ain't that great, and your companion AI is a bit retarded, i wasn't surprised the first time i played it.
-
Jan 4, 2012Fuel of War was absolutely horrible the worst game i have ever played. Lets start with the graphics, because geez they are complete **** the gameplay was spawn and die by a camper 300 meters away and overall a **** game i didnt want to bother long with before uninstalling.
-
Dec 22, 2011This game is of a very low quality every area. I would rate it lower but I did actually finish it a couple of times. The multiplayer is a battlefield ripoff fail. I would NOT buy this game, not from a store, not off Steam. It's not worth your internet connection and most certainly not your money or time. Take it from a "veteran" of the game I guess.
-
Dec 6, 2011The game is great; Bad Company but, in my opinion, better. The underlying story is also pretty good. Plus, it's only about US$15 (if it's not on sale[which it often is] for about 20c), which is great value.
-
Nov 1, 2011Essentially it's BBC2 without all the hype fancy graphics and without the destruction.. ok its not by any means BBC2 but i did find it reminicent. Anyway i'm giving it a 8 because it's fun and the gameplay is smooth
-
Jul 1, 2011Not ground breaking but it does have enough cool elements to make it fun. Sometimes a good fun game doen't have to be awesome. The graphics are decent. Gameplay is decent. I think some people criticize to hard. Kick back and have fun playing a decent shooter.
-
May 18, 2011Albeit short, this game turned out to be action-packed fun. It's no Battlefield 1942 or Desert Combat, but it definitely tries to be. Good stocking stuffer.
-
Apr 8, 2011Jeu au graphisme, et un game-player super-be, les armes on une très bonne prise en main, aussi les véhicules, di-gne d'un counters strike, je seul chose je vous conseillez, "achetez le".
-
Dec 25, 2010great game for multiplayer, up to 64 players in server, ability to choose class (ground support, air support, drone tech...) also in game Armoured Fighting Vehicles (tanks, helicopters, aircrafts etc...). fast and realistic action. definitely worth the money
-
Dec 19, 2010
-
Dec 10, 2010
-
Nov 4, 2010
-
Nov 3, 2010Getting past the first mission, the lag stopped. From there on the game was a blast. I enjoyed the story, gameplay mechanics, gunplay and action pacing. The Multiplayer is great. Some people expect too much from smaller games like this.
-
Oct 31, 2010I got this game off steam for 1.5â
-
Oct 3, 2010A solid game in which your only friend is the empty echo of what else, but lag.The weapons and vehicles feels a little old through.Pity.The story is ...MIA(missing in action).
-
EdwardG.Jan 30, 2010
-
-
ThiagoMDec 31, 2009Very cool system of "Experience" and cool classes... The vehicles makes the game really fun and teh battle struture its pretty easy and complete. The bad things would be the Server Browzer but you can quickly avoid this using other softwares to connect you to servers.
-
-
ElBartoDec 25, 2009
-
-
JamesBDec 7, 2009not much replay value and online is pretty basic with nothing to work towards all in all is a good experience while it lasts
-
-
SteveHNov 29, 2009Great story line, easy to control, and similiar to the old Black Hawk Down series.
-
-
ErwinRNov 25, 2009
-
Awards & Rankings
-
Frontlines does enough to entertain on the multiplayer end to make up for the woeful single-player experience. It’s a shame Kaos didn’t scrap the single-player altogether to focus completely on honing the online experience.
-
If you can forget about the fact that you’ve been playing this style game for years with the Battlefield franchise then Frontlines will hook you for some time with its gargantuan battles, but for most Fuel of War will likely be too generic to truly sink their teeth into.
-
Frontlines is basically an easy-to-learn shooter with lots of action. But your AI-controlled comrades-in-arms are close to useless because of their stupid behavior. This is the reason why Kaos Studios didn't achive the goal to create a solo campaign that feels like a multiplayer game. In the end, it's a team shooter that plays like an ego shooter - at least as long as you play offline.