- Publisher: EA Games
- Release Date: Nov 13, 2007
- Also On: PlayStation 3, Xbox 360
User Score
Generally favorable reviews- based on 2881 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 2,109 out of 2881
-
Mixed: 559 out of 2881
-
Negative: 213 out of 2881
Buy Now
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
ClearViewOct 27, 2009The graphics are very good so that's a big 10. The gameplay is really bad.. In the beginning you have some fun but later on it get's boring. And the finish of the game is really bad... It's like someone started to create something and had to do the work in 1 hour in stead of 2 months. So i had not much fun with this game..
-
-
B.A.F.Feb 28, 2009
-
-
Aug 27, 2010
-
Nov 19, 2014Graphics? Simply amazing, holding up even to today's standards. Story and characters? Meh. And the VTOL jet sequence mini-game? Maddening. It's a beautiful little shooter, but it's heart does not match its looks.
-
Jul 12, 2022
-
Aug 29, 2011
-
Feb 21, 2012To some, a benchmark. For others, a benchmark of how a great traditional open world first person shooter is made. For me crysis walks the middle ground. It's pacing was flawed, however it's systems flow with grace. It will always look incredible - however what many fail to recognize is that the actual game underneath - is kind of incredible as well. Just not perfect.
-
May 25, 2011
-
Nov 25, 2010
-
Jun 28, 2015- Good: Pushing hardware to maximum, Shooting
- Mixed: Gameplay
- Bad: Story, Linear, Monotonous
Decent game but nothing more. Boring and monotonous after some time. -
GordonB.Oct 14, 2008
-
-
Mar 10, 2013
-
Mar 2, 2014
-
Jan 4, 2011
-
Jan 16, 2011
-
Jul 15, 2011
-
Oct 27, 2013Really enjoyable but epically broken shooter. It's entirely possible to have the game miss a cue and you will never be able to move forward from there.
-
May 4, 2011not a good followup to far cry. this game tried too hard to complicate game play by adding sci fi nanosuits etc....gamers just want to shoot and kill while keeping it simple. this game when first released was a system resource hog and barely playable. some ppl love this game but it just didnt really excite me i guess because i dont like the whole future element.
-
MichaelK.Dec 6, 2007
-
-
Jan 12, 2013
-
Jan 31, 2013
-
Feb 19, 2011Finally after 3 years I could play this game. Now my rig can handle it (phenom2 965, hd 6850, 4gb, win7). Hopefully crysis2 will be better optimized.
-
TimothyKJan 6, 2010
-
-
MichaelR.Apr 3, 2008
-
-
ChrisH.Feb 22, 2008Sure the graphics are amazing. even in Low spec its not bad. but after testing it. it made me realize how many things that were very critical were left in the game. like having the end bug out and having the TAC not lock on STILL! story line is quite boring. Multiplayer wise love it. but wish they kept the gore level in that we saw in Alpha. IE corpse chunks from MOAR
-
-
TrustMeMar 5, 2008Pros: Great quality, good start, awsome look, cool idea Cons: Too much bugs, crashes, needs high end PC, and AI is way to poor.
-
-
CodyFNov 8, 2009
-
-
JohnB.Jul 3, 2009
-
-
HemmoB.Dec 20, 2007
-
-
JohnnyMJan 10, 2008
-
Awards & Rankings
-
PC GamerDestined to be a classic, Crysis is a creative and technological marvel that eclipses every other shooter released this year. [Holiday 2007, p.60]
-
Crysis thrives on putting the onus on you to create your own brand of action and adventure in its stunningly beautiful locations. You and the game can haphazardly create moments of such gaming brilliance that often you pretty much have to stand up and applaud. [Christmas 2007, p.44]
-
This is some fast, well designed gameplay with enough options to allow players to use their own style of attack with satisfying suit abilities and weapons. Crytek has upped their attention to detail in presentation and dropped the worst parts of "Far Cry’s" story.