Metascore
63

Mixed or average reviews - based on 19 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 3 out of 19
  2. Negative: 2 out of 19
  1. Straightforward, simple, but slick and solid. Cossacks is comfort food, but it feels sufficiently of today despite its cheerfully throwback heart. I had a good time, and most of all I realised that I’m more than ready for this once so staid of genres to come back in earnest.
User Score
6.5

Mixed or average reviews- based on 207 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Negative: 54 out of 207
  1. Sep 22, 2016
    0
    Game is client-side in MP, meaning you can edit all units to cost 0 and it works in MP, so -10/10, complete **** up. This is worse thenGame is client-side in MP, meaning you can edit all units to cost 0 and it works in MP, so -10/10, complete **** up. This is worse then amateurish programming. Full Review »
  2. Sep 20, 2016
    1
    This game rather looks like it belong to the year 2005 than 2016. The worst thing is the static vegetation - totally ruins the atmosphere forThis game rather looks like it belong to the year 2005 than 2016. The worst thing is the static vegetation - totally ruins the atmosphere for me. Water looks like something from the original Age of Empires from 90s. I lost most of my interest during the first 5 minutes in the game just because of the way it looks. Full Review »
  3. Sep 21, 2016
    0
    Terrible, terrible optimisation for that pretty bad graphic (worst than 8-years old Red Alert 3). Bad AI compare to ANY Total war game. ITerrible, terrible optimisation for that pretty bad graphic (worst than 8-years old Red Alert 3). Bad AI compare to ANY Total war game. I recommend that game only if you want some nostalgic feelings if you play Cossacks 2 back in the 2005. IgorDyx said that it's a remake, but it's not. And Starcraft 2 compare to Starcraft made a big leap not only in a graphics but in a gameplay and story. And that guy also give the Thief 2014 8/10 so it's must something wrong with his sense of reality. Full Review »