Call of Duty: Modern Warfare

 PC
User Score
2.7

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 3781 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 881 out of 3781
  2. Mixed: 124 out of 3781
  3. Negative: 2,776 out of 3781

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Kimomarudotcom
    Oct 31, 2019
    7
    It's Call of Duty, so if you like a game where players run around in circles to shoot each other in the a$$, look no further, Infinity Ward has you covered and then some. The game has two major problems. First, the frame rate isn't locked at anything (at least on my PC, and I'm running a GTX 1160 Ti). It lurches from 60 to 35 to 50 fps for no apparent reason and then stops. MyIt's Call of Duty, so if you like a game where players run around in circles to shoot each other in the a$$, look no further, Infinity Ward has you covered and then some. The game has two major problems. First, the frame rate isn't locked at anything (at least on my PC, and I'm running a GTX 1160 Ti). It lurches from 60 to 35 to 50 fps for no apparent reason and then stops. My suspicion is that it's related to the streaming of assets because I'm not seeing any pegging in CPU, GPU, mem, or disc IO. As I understand it, CoD:MW 2019 performs best on the PS4 Pro, but even then it's not locked. Personally, I think Infinity Ward was too ambitious with their tech, it may turn out in about a year that its new tech runs amazingly well, but today not so much. I could write pages about the single player campaign, but I'll spare you; it's not great. And since this game is a reboot of a game that stood out for its quality, this is particularly disappointing.

    And still, there's quite a bit of buzz over this game on Twitch, so it's clear that people are loving it. It's a beautiful game, but I wish I understood the mind of a person who's able to endure a game like this for 5 or 6 hours per session. In the end, it's the same game as always and it must resonate with many people who just have to have more of it. Just not with me.    … Expand
  2. MRBeanJoga
    Jan 14, 2022
    7
    Eng

    Decent campaign although the Russians had a pretty bad and unfair imagery in this one, probably one of the best (if not the best) cod multiplayer experience in years and a downright broken and terribly designed spec-ops mode. The game still holds up as the best looking overall cod as of this review, really satisfying gunplay, neat weapon customization and more freedom to travel    Eng

    Decent campaign although the Russians had a pretty bad and unfair imagery in this one, probably one of the best (if not the best) cod multiplayer experience in years and a downright broken and terribly designed spec-ops mode.

    The game still holds up as the best looking overall cod as of this review, really satisfying gunplay, neat weapon customization and more freedom to travel through the multiplayer maps.

    However it has its issues, this game takes too much storage size (120gb+), unbalanced perks, terrible spawns and more

    Even with its issues i still think its the best CoD game since Black Ops 2.    … Expand
  3. bobemil
    Dec 3, 2019
    7
    This is only about singleplayer because the multiplayer is not for me. I love the feeling of the gameplay. It has some really good missions and some not as good. I'm not fully into the story but it's ok. I get what they were trying to do but it fails to get me fully into it. Many russians have complained about the story and I get what they are saying but it's still a game. Russians canThis is only about singleplayer because the multiplayer is not for me. I love the feeling of the gameplay. It has some really good missions and some not as good. I'm not fully into the story but it's ok. I get what they were trying to do but it fails to get me fully into it. Many russians have complained about the story and I get what they are saying but it's still a game. Russians can create whatever game story they like without me complaining about it. I think it's silly to take such offense by it.

    The campaign had some really nice missions with nice graphics and gameplay. I just wish there were more of them because Spec Ops is not fun for singleplayer.    … Expand
  4. ForeverRev
    Oct 29, 2019
    7
    The story is 5/10 as it's way too short. It's lacking a lot of details. You're just thrown into a war with the goal of capturing the Wolf. No background story about how it all leads to that, so it feels kinda empty.
    I will also mention that the Russians are portrayed a bit too harsh in this game, though I'm not incredibly impacted by it (I'm neither russian nor american). Multiplayer is    The story is 5/10 as it's way too short. It's lacking a lot of details. You're just thrown into a war with the goal of capturing the Wolf. No background story about how it all leads to that, so it feels kinda empty.
    I will also mention that the Russians are portrayed a bit too harsh in this game, though I'm not incredibly impacted by it (I'm neither russian nor american). Multiplayer is great, loving the gunplay. Spec ops is decent but the most **** part is that it a gamemode has become ps4 exclusive.    … Expand
  5. Lo8o
    Oct 29, 2019
    7
    Russian why spoil the evaluation of the game really not playing it it's just a game not that more and then say that you are evil really not playing the game # defense call of duty
  6. RonaldMugDonald
    Nov 3, 2019
    7
    I just came here to see how Russians **** about this game. Anyhow, this game is not 0 of course, 7/10.
  7. jackevmi
    Oct 21, 2020
    7
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This is a great game but is plagued by many issues
    Spec ops: I'm putting the worst first here. Spec ops is complete **** there's barely any missions, it doesn't have much content so i dont have much to talk about.
    Campaign: Holy **** this campaign is awesome, it has an amazing story but some weird elements, one example of a weird thing in the story is when the highway of death is bombed by russians and not americans.
    Multiplayer: The multiplayer is awesome and brings many new additions to the table. Gunsmith: The gunsmith in this game has one of the most in depth customization i've ever seen.
    Overall Gameplay: The gameplay is amazing it brings many new additions such as canting and hybrid optics.    … Expand
  8. T2XTeksi
    Sep 16, 2020
    7
    I've played COD series since COD2 and again a good game is delivered. I mainly focus on this review to the MP side of this game. Game suffers some compatibility problems every now and then, patch one and another one pops up. I really like this game and have played it quite a lot. 12days and 12 hours so far according the game statistics. I'd like to give this game a better score

    But this    I've played COD series since COD2 and again a good game is delivered. I mainly focus on this review to the MP side of this game. Game suffers some compatibility problems every now and then, patch one and another one pops up. I really like this game and have played it quite a lot. 12days and 12 hours so far according the game statistics. I'd like to give this game a better score

    But this game and so many previous titles suffered from the same problems. As a gamer I feel like the community isn't heard on some matters. Some earlier games had awesome modding that made us able to play competitive matches in a totally different level. Now that is greatly hindered.

    And on of the biggest problem is developers unwillingness or incompetence to address the issue of hackers. They are many and always seems to find their way to public matches no matter the kind. This game does have report system but it doesn't really seem to help and there's no automated scanning/preventing of even the most obvious hackers. That's the main reason I'd want anyone wondering about buying this game the think if they are prepared for a such thing.    … Expand
  9. PolarizedOrange
    Jul 29, 2022
    7
    Ok, I wish I could enjoy the multiplayer a bit more but honestly it's not my favorite. I do love the campaign though it's awesome. Sadly the multiplayer falls heavily short due to camping and perks being broken. Not to mention, the fast TTK is a bit of an annoyance. Co-Op? Is practically dead sadly. However, it did revive the CoD Franchise. I'll give them a bit of credit.
  10. larry_perry
    Dec 21, 2020
    7
    I bought this game a while after I played the warzone mode, which I don’t like that much. I just can’t see any battle royale game anymore.
    So if you just want to have fun with some friends and get that nostalgic cod feeling, this is your game. Unfortunately after one year the price is still pretty high which I don’t understand. The multiplayer mode is not worth 50$ and nobody cares about    I bought this game a while after I played the warzone mode, which I don’t like that much. I just can’t see any battle royale game anymore.
    So if you just want to have fun with some friends and get that nostalgic cod feeling, this is your game. Unfortunately after one year the price is still pretty high which I don’t understand. The multiplayer mode is not worth 50$ and nobody cares about the single player.    … Expand
  11. threeoftendie
    Feb 5, 2023
    7
    Это одна из игр моего детства. И, несмотря на возраст и недостатки, о которых я сейчас узнаю от других, она не кажется мне плохой
  12. kingzardoz
    Nov 14, 2019
    6
    Multiplayer review updated: Can't vote on maps still. The developers have been pushing out updates to fix many issues one of those being the gun balance. I still think they have a long way to go but things are getting better. The Skill Based Matchmaking has divided the community quite a bit but I don't mind it at all. I prefer always playing against sweaty players but I would like to seeMultiplayer review updated: Can't vote on maps still. The developers have been pushing out updates to fix many issues one of those being the gun balance. I still think they have a long way to go but things are getting better. The Skill Based Matchmaking has divided the community quite a bit but I don't mind it at all. I prefer always playing against sweaty players but I would like to see them fix the weapon balance more so 50% of the sweats stop running overkill + shotguns. The M4 is still a laser and can still out snipe all but the best snipers. If they buffed Focus perk that would change, right now the focus perk is almost usless because it only offers flinch resistance and not 100% flinch nullification. With guns like the Kar98 and MK2 you live and die by the first shot, at medium and long distances an M4 will smack you with enough bullets to cause a flinch significant enough to throw off your first shot, if your shot hits anywhere besides the upper chest or head then you are 95% of the time a dead person. Focus definitely needs a buff to make the single shot rifles more viable. Footsteps sounds are improving. 50% of the weapon attachments are still useless when all that matters are high ADS speed and controling horizontal recoil (Recoil Stablization). Camping strategies are still annoying and rewarding as hell because of claymores and shotguns. They need to move the Overkill perk to another perk class or take shotguns out of the game. After putting in a lot of hours into the semiautos and bolt actions (FAL, Kar98, MK2, EBR) the hit reg issues have become more obvious. At least 2-3x a night I will fire the Kar98 or MK2 into the chest of a stationary enemy and I will get no hit registration, the same thing will happen for headshots at least once a night. The hit reg issues are less obvious with full auto weapons but I've had nights where half of a mag will not register.

    Singleplayer review: I finally got around to playing the singleplayer or playing as much of it as I could. At one level/mission I ran into a critical error that keeps happening, after reading about the issue it seems that the only solution is to resinstall the game but since I'm on DSL and the game is 120+gb I won't be doing that anytime soon. What I have played of the singleplayer ranged from typical and boring call of duty missions to interesting reality simulations. The intro to piccadilly square and clearing some house with night vision were insanely immersive and much more unique than the typical COD gameplay of having a bunch of bots run at you. Regarding the propaganda that many of these reviewers are unhappy with, I don't know what to say other than Call of Duty has most likely been a recruiting tool for the DOD since the original modern warfare so you're going to get tons of DOD bull****.    … Expand
  13. sinadoom
    Dec 29, 2020
    6
    Modern Warfare makes some significant advancements to the Call of Duty series, but the few things it gets wrong are baffling, because this game was so close to being perfect, at least as a multiplayer game.
    Let's start off with the multiplayer. It's the most significant aspect of the game, and Infinity Ward got almost everything right. There are plenty of weapons to choose from, with    Modern Warfare makes some significant advancements to the Call of Duty series, but the few things it gets wrong are baffling, because this game was so close to being perfect, at least as a multiplayer game.
    Let's start off with the multiplayer. It's the most significant aspect of the game, and Infinity Ward got almost everything right. There are plenty of weapons to choose from, with incredibly detailed customisation both in terms of functionality and appearance thanks to the Gunsmith, which means everyone can find something for their style. The create-a-class is simple and balanced, with decent perks; though some killstreaks are OP. The camo challenges are well thought out, not too grindy to get what you want but grindy enough to keep you going for a long time. There are new mechanics like mounting and tactical sprint, but to be honest I wouldn't mind if they went away. What IW have nailed is the mechanics; we have bullet drop physics rather than hitscan, and the variety of weapons can really be felt; each attachment makes a noticeable difference to the weapon. Weapon balancing is decent too. As someone that almost exclusively uses snipers and marksman rifles, I have to be honest, this is by far the easiest CoD for quickscoping, but the short time to kill and low recoil of auto weapons, along with their long range damage potential, mean it's still balanced. What IW got catastrophically wrong however, is the maps. The ONLY good maps in this game are the Gunfight maps (designed for 2v2), Hackney Yard and Shoot House. The rest are garbage, and the game is only partially redeemed by bringing back some amazing classic maps like Shipment, Vacant and Crash from CoD4.

    The main thing I credit this game for however, is the cross-platform play. For once, it means buying a CoD game on PC makes sense, and being able to play with Xbox or PlayStation friends is perhaps the single most important contribution of this game to the franchise in my opinion. It uses input-based matchmaking, allowing you to use a controller on PC if you so wish (which personally I prefer for CoD). The controls are also top-notch; regardless of whether you use keyboard & mouse or gamepad, the game feels great and responsive.

    Graphically, the game is "fine", but nothing more. It is unimpressive, but quite timeless. It's not trying to look good, but doesn't look dated either. It's just quite bland and going for that "realistic" look. Also, the ray-traced shadows are joke; they make almost no noticeable difference and are stupidly demanding even with an RTX card, so don't bother with them. Otherwise the optimisation is OK, though it has gotten somewhat worse since launch. It could definitely be improved. What is completely unacceptable however, is the insane size of updates we've had since launch, every time requiring us to download at 50 GB for minor changes. The overall game with just multiplayer stands at 135 GB; far too much for what it offers. What's inexcusable is how Warzone replaced this game, becoming the base game and forcing a free-to-play game onto those who paid for it. You cannot remove Warzone, and it's evident that Activision no longer care about MW. I won't get into the whole rebranding in this review, but it's disgraceful.

    Finally I want to talk about campaign and spec ops. The latter is a complete joke; it's evident the developers rushed spec ops - one of the best things about Modern Warfare 2 and 3 - because it's very glitchy, and far too many enemies. Above all, it's unexciting, not well thought out and very bland. So effectively one third of the game is redundant. As for the campaign, it sets a different tone for Call of Duty, and it's a nice change, but I really don't want to see a campaign like this again. Simply put, it's by far the shortest CoD campaign I have played, and it's also the easiest, even on the newly added "Realistic" difficulty, which is basically Veteran without HUD. The levels are comically short, the story is controversial and overall it just lacks the spectacle and excitement you'd expect from a CoD campaign. To be clear, it's not a terrible campaign, it's just massively overrated and the gameplay is unexciting.

    Overall, I think MW2019 makes some fundamentally important contributions to Call of Duty as a franchise and gets a lot of things right, but the overall direction is not one that I am fond of, as a long-time fan. It's going for that "realistic" tone in an attempt to attract casuals, along with the horrible map design, the promotion of camping, skill-based matchmaking, night vision and other things. Simply put, the designers tried to make CoD into something it's not: a slow-paced tactical shooter. It is evident from fan feedback and how most players play the game that this is completely out of touch with what the fans wanted.    … Expand
  14. Neylian
    Nov 3, 2019
    6
    Love the campaign, the brutal reality of it and the aggressor Russian forces shown pretty well as well. I thought its going to be another soft approach but its solid. I've noticed Russians having hard time to look at themselves as being an aggressor but you're guys :) you still are a force of evil in this world. I can recall Ukraine and Georgia intervention wars as a recent aggression fromLove the campaign, the brutal reality of it and the aggressor Russian forces shown pretty well as well. I thought its going to be another soft approach but its solid. I've noticed Russians having hard time to look at themselves as being an aggressor but you're guys :) you still are a force of evil in this world. I can recall Ukraine and Georgia intervention wars as a recent aggression from you and many other smaller before that. As a modern warfare subject this game nails it. I actually love how Russians go nuts over it - truth hurts lol. Multiplayer is mediocre - for 12 years old. No strategy just pew pew camp camp pew pew and thats it. Wish campaign would be 6 hrs more longer - to hell with multiplayer.… Expand
  15. EpicSurvivor
    Oct 25, 2019
    6
    This review is for Multiplayer only. Big Call of Duty fan since Modern Warfare 2. I love COD. COD WW2(2017) is one of the best COD Multiplayer experiences there is IMO. I just love it. Black Ops2 comes close because its a classic. I still own MW2 and MW3 and play those regularly (Multiplayer) on PC same goes for Ghosts and Advanced Warfare. I love Multiplayer gameplay for COD games, justThis review is for Multiplayer only. Big Call of Duty fan since Modern Warfare 2. I love COD. COD WW2(2017) is one of the best COD Multiplayer experiences there is IMO. I just love it. Black Ops2 comes close because its a classic. I still own MW2 and MW3 and play those regularly (Multiplayer) on PC same goes for Ghosts and Advanced Warfare. I love Multiplayer gameplay for COD games, just something about them but the New Modern Warfare just feels very bland and boring. It doesn't live up to its hype. I bought this for Multiplayer and I got a good deal for it $40 and I feel like I got cheated for my money. Multiplayer is just very bland and boring. I'll just keep playing COD WW2. Buy at your own risk. Multiplayer kinda sucks tho.… Expand
  16. Ferorake
    Jun 24, 2020
    6
    Aggiorno la mia recensione oramai dopo parecchie ore, e francamente penso di smettere completamente di giocarlo. Lo ho comprato al day one, mi ci sono divertito, i problemi iniziali di bilanciamento sono stati risolti, la varietà di armi è diventata veramente grande, e più o meno è possibile goderselo anche utilizzando armi "poco comuni". Il problema purtroppo estremamente limitante cheAggiorno la mia recensione oramai dopo parecchie ore, e francamente penso di smettere completamente di giocarlo. Lo ho comprato al day one, mi ci sono divertito, i problemi iniziali di bilanciamento sono stati risolti, la varietà di armi è diventata veramente grande, e più o meno è possibile goderselo anche utilizzando armi "poco comuni". Il problema purtroppo estremamente limitante che sto riscontrando nell'ultimo periodo è la presenza enorme di cheaters sulla versione PC. Una partita su due o tre ne contiene uno, ed è semplicemente impossibile giocare. Quittando spesso queste partite si viene inseriti "in media res" in altre, talvolta profondamente sotto di punteggio, con serie di uccisioni nemiche attive, e pronti solo a fare da "bersagli mobili".
    E' assurdo perché il gioco dopo 6 mesi era diventato veramente godibile ( altra frase che francamente disturba ascoltare visto che al day-one si paga il prezzo pieno e non una percentuale ), ma l'accesso troppo semplice ai cheat, e L'ASSOLUTA MANCANZA DI UN SISTEMA ANTI-CHEAT sta rovinando l'esperienza a tutti. Mi dispiace ma avevo riacquistato COD dopo qualche anno di pausa, e non ripeterò l'errore. 10 anni fa giocavo su FPS online con sistemi anti-cheat granitici, non trovarli su un AAA del 2019 lo trovo assurdo.
    Velo pietoso anche sul ridicolo sistema di "battle pass": soldati vestiti nelle maniere più disparate ( che cozzano con la non possibilità di identificare se un nemico sia alleato o nemico oltre una certa distanza, che porta a sprecare colpi su colpi per poi accorgersi che sia un alleato ), armi stile fortnite, veramente pietoso. Speriamo in un futuro battlefield che farà tesoro di tutti questi errori.    … Expand
  17. D4nylo
    Oct 30, 2019
    6
    Игра хороша,но нового контента нет.Кто-то подумает чтонет,веть добавиль режим "наземная война" и "огневой контакт",да,но в том то и дело что это все.
    Абилие оружия,как бы не так.Реализм и тактика-никак нет.
    Зато,донат,просяды фпс когда системные требования подходят,Графон,который как бы есть но он на уровне первой батлы которая в 2016 вышла.Кому-то может понравится,но многим-нет    Игра хороша,но нового контента нет.Кто-то подумает чтонет,веть добавиль режим "наземная война" и "огневой контакт",да,но в том то и дело что это все.
    Абилие оружия,как бы не так.Реализм и тактика-никак нет.
    Зато,донат,просяды фпс когда системные требования подходят,Графон,который как бы есть но он на уровне первой батлы которая в 2016 вышла.Кому-то может понравится,но многим-нет
  18. PicklRick
    Oct 30, 2019
    6
    Shortly: Campaign is great and fun despite the clearly unrealistic picture it portrays about both Western and Russian soldiers

    Multiplayer: just as fun as playing the old one when it came out

    Co-op: just an empty experience and have no idea why is it even in the game, a disgrace to the franchise
  19. C4rn4ge
    Nov 26, 2019
    6
    Campaign: 9/10

    One of the best if not the best campaign in a CoD ever. Sadly the pc version has laggy cutscenes and the playtime is a bit too short Multiplayer: 4/10 The most important part of a CoD is in this CoD pretty **** bad. SBMM ruins the whole experience, the worst maps we have ever had and also the fewest, communication from IW sucks, ground war .s just not fun after a    Campaign: 9/10

    One of the best if not the best campaign in a CoD ever. Sadly the pc version has laggy cutscenes and the playtime is a bit too short

    Multiplayer: 4/10

    The most important part of a CoD is in this CoD pretty **** bad. SBMM ruins the whole experience, the worst maps we have ever had and also the fewest, communication from IW sucks, ground war .s just not fun after a few rounds...

    Spec Ops: Not played but is received as extremly bad

    CoD: Modern Warfare [6,5/10]    … Expand
  20. elolugo
    Nov 15, 2019
    6
    Campaign is brutal and fun but feels propaganda-ish rooting for USA-UK and make you hate Russia. Honestly
  21. ne0tic
    Nov 4, 2019
    6
    Well then... The hype for this game was so damn big, but not anymore unfortunately.

    Multiplayer: 6/10, The multiplayer in COD: MW honestly doesn't feel that great on PC, the maps are horrible and made for just camping... The game doesn't feel finished and 75% of the content the game should have had on launch were missing in the first 30 hours! Guns shoot nice but aiming down sight is so    Well then... The hype for this game was so damn big, but not anymore unfortunately.

    Multiplayer: 6/10, The multiplayer in COD: MW honestly doesn't feel that great on PC, the maps are horrible and made for just camping... The game doesn't feel finished and 75% of the content the game should have had on launch were missing in the first 30 hours! Guns shoot nice but aiming down sight is so so slow without the right atachments so that it is impossible to do anything but camp in the beggining. Even with the right atachments it is a struggle to be able to aim fast enough if you are moving a lot, and you still get killed from campers sitting in windows anyways... The multiplayer have got some hope going forward if they change some stuff, but right now it is not something I recommend playing!

    Campaign: 9/10, The campaign is really good! One of the best Call of Duty campaign ever and even one of the better FPS campaigns of all times!

    Spec Ops: 2/10, There is not much to say about this because there is not much in this mode... Also, it is really hard and almost impossible for casual players to succeed in this mode! Honestly I don't know what Infinity Ward were thinking with Spec Ops, it is nothing like it used to be in the old games and right now the best words to describe it is ''Kind of a Disaster''!...

    With all that being said, the game isn't bad. It is just not what it should have been...    … Expand
  22. Cnv939
    Nov 12, 2019
    6
    + Solid gunplay, there are lots of weapon customization options, multiplayer is pretty good.

    - Graphics looks unimpressive, even battlefield 4 has better visuals imo, single player mode requires internet connection
  23. SinkerofTinnies
    Oct 28, 2019
    6
    Half of the reviews here are butthurt Slavaboos upset that Mother Russia isn't the hero of the story. The game has performance issues on PC, with stuttering being the star of the show. UI is horrendously unusable and often gets below 5 FPS, with being worse on launch but it slowly gets better the more the game is used in a session.

    Graphics are surprisingly good for a CoD game. Gun Play    Half of the reviews here are butthurt Slavaboos upset that Mother Russia isn't the hero of the story. The game has performance issues on PC, with stuttering being the star of the show. UI is horrendously unusable and often gets below 5 FPS, with being worse on launch but it slowly gets better the more the game is used in a session.

    Graphics are surprisingly good for a CoD game. Gun Play is awesome, guns feel like they are actually doing damage, not tickling the enemy to death. Ground War is awesome, but it only comes with 2 maps and only 250 tickets, so games don't last that long. Great for those wanting a Battlefield-type game without the **** that comes with a Battlefield game.

    Cutscenes in the Single Player are choppy as all hell and are just plain unwatchable with it getting below 5fps.    … Expand
  24. Kamolinapopa
    Apr 8, 2020
    6
    My complaints about the game: - The legs and shadow of the protagonist in a single company are not visible; - The narrative and the characters do not cling in any way: unrealistic dialogues, bland; - There is no atmosphere; - An unfinished ragdoll physics, when you shoot at corpses - physical movement works on hands and heads; - The corpses do not have a collision, that is, the legs of theMy complaints about the game: - The legs and shadow of the protagonist in a single company are not visible; - The narrative and the characters do not cling in any way: unrealistic dialogues, bland; - There is no atmosphere; - An unfinished ragdoll physics, when you shoot at corpses - physical movement works on hands and heads; - The corpses do not have a collision, that is, the legs of the characters fall into them and when touched do not have physical movements; - When you approach a wall a weapon does not lean toward you; - A complete lack of destructibility - the standing next to the chairs do not react to the explosion of a grenade; - Vegetation does not react to characters in any way when they pass through them.… Expand
  25. nowikritik
    Nov 25, 2019
    6
    я изменил отзыв, так как раньше у меня сложилось мнение что игра сушествует только для кемперов, прошло время, я изучил карты, теперь все хорошо, кемперы вымераюший вид.

    также мне понравилась тактическая составляюшая, раньше я только рашил в предыдуших частях, сейчас мне нравиться использовать карты в свою пользу, это приятно, и скорость прицеливания не являеться проблемой, когда я    я изменил отзыв, так как раньше у меня сложилось мнение что игра сушествует только для кемперов, прошло время, я изучил карты, теперь все хорошо, кемперы вымераюший вид.

    также мне понравилась тактическая составляюшая, раньше я только рашил в предыдуших частях, сейчас мне нравиться использовать карты в свою пользу, это приятно, и скорость прицеливания не являеться проблемой, когда я прокачал пушку то запросто мог ускорить прицеливание модулями.

    плохо что нет браузера серверов, и выделеных серверов, я не хочу играть с пингом 60>, из-за этого 6/10

    игра хорошая, но я хочу играть на чьем нибудь сервере где бой длиться дольше, не люблю короткие бои.
    ---------------------
    I changed the review, because earlier I had the opinion that the game exists only for campers, time passed, I studied the maps, now everything is fine, campers are extinct.

    I also liked the tactical component, I used to only rush in the previous parts, now I like to use cards to my advantage, it's nice, and the aiming speed is not a problem, when I pumped the gun, it could easily accelerate the aiming with modules.

    it’s bad that there is no browser of servers, and dedicated servers, I do not want to play with ping 60>, because of this 6/10

    the game is good, but I want to play on someone’s server where the fight lasts longer, I don’t like short fights.    … Expand
  26. gshum
    Dec 8, 2019
    6
    Oh man... After getting this game I can see why Russians are really upset about this. It's blatantly about the Syrian war and randomly paints Russians as psychopathic killers who must be killed.... It never really mentions the Syrian regime itself. Then it paints white helmets and the resistance fighters as good guys. Then of course it has a terrorist group closely resembling IS but theirOh man... After getting this game I can see why Russians are really upset about this. It's blatantly about the Syrian war and randomly paints Russians as psychopathic killers who must be killed.... It never really mentions the Syrian regime itself. Then it paints white helmets and the resistance fighters as good guys. Then of course it has a terrorist group closely resembling IS but their name is basically Al Qaeda.

    It's kind of **** up to make a game about a current conflict. It's also **** up to just paint one side as evil and one side as good. Conflicts are always full of grey areas.

    I don't really know what they were thinking with the campaign... It's **** crazy honestly. It's like someone kind of read some articles about the Syrian conflict and made some very well made game about it that has very little to do with reality.

    The game itself is polished and online/single player are both well made. But yeah, now I know why russians are up in arms about this game. Its **** up. America committed plenty of war crimes in Afghanistan/Iraq. But I guess you're SAS so you're english and don't get blamed for that? This game is all over the place.    … Expand
  27. cosmik_gg
    Dec 25, 2019
    6
    Single player campaign is great but short. Co-op feels tacked on and is just waves of enemies, but it's not terrible. Multiplayer is such a mixed bag. The guns feel great, and the attachments are robust, but the maps range from horrible to mediocre. These are some of the worst maps I've played in a multiplayer shooter. You will find yourself often just leaving lobbies when certain maps popSingle player campaign is great but short. Co-op feels tacked on and is just waves of enemies, but it's not terrible. Multiplayer is such a mixed bag. The guns feel great, and the attachments are robust, but the maps range from horrible to mediocre. These are some of the worst maps I've played in a multiplayer shooter. You will find yourself often just leaving lobbies when certain maps pop up.. more than likely PIccadilly or Euphrates Bridge, both IMO the worst maps ever put into a COD game.

    Other major issues include the use of SBMM, skills based match making, which results in long wait times for matches and poorly balanced games. You will often find yourself getting crushed by sweaty players, then in a lobby full of bad players you stomp on, then back to the lobby full of MLG pros. You won't get a chance to just chill and enjoy the game because you're constantly sweating. This game was made for streamers, basically.

    All in all, it's a very mediocre game with some really great production value. The SBMM and maps just ruin it. I do not recommend paying full price, but if you could grab it on sale for like $20, it might be worth it. Don't buy the battlepass, it takes a stupidly long time to level up.    … Expand
  28. Renaigse
    Jan 8, 2020
    6
    Сюжет то еще говно, куда интересней сетевая составляющая игры. Карты просто убожество, везде кемперы, имбовые ганы не фиксят, режим Наземная война то еще калище, особенно для тех, кто хоть раз в жизни играл в BF, техника крайне убогая, выглядит так же, как и управляется, убого. Однако оружие, как по ощущениям, так и по анимациям, внешке, просто супер. Ни в одной игре такого классногоСюжет то еще говно, куда интересней сетевая составляющая игры. Карты просто убожество, везде кемперы, имбовые ганы не фиксят, режим Наземная война то еще калище, особенно для тех, кто хоть раз в жизни играл в BF, техника крайне убогая, выглядит так же, как и управляется, убого. Однако оружие, как по ощущениям, так и по анимациям, внешке, просто супер. Ни в одной игре такого классного оружия не было. Карты хоть и убоги, но есть и нормальные, к сожалению, разрабы голосование за карту убрали, видимо хотят, чтобы мы играли на всяком говне, ведь если не будем, то они зря его клепали. Кастомизация оружия так же лучшая, что когда-либо я видел в шутерах, однако зря они убрали систему престижей, качаться теперь менее интересно, ввели кучу монитизации, скинов в платном магазине очень много и они очень дорого стоят, конечно же, куда без боевого пропуска( офк платного), королевскую битву до сих пор не ввели. Комьюнити просто убожество, полно глиномесов - кемперов и тех, кто бегает с дробиками или мп-5. На данный момент у игры больше минусов, чем плюсов, играть не советую.… Expand
  29. Lenny5125
    Feb 20, 2020
    6
    The Multiplayer is fun for a while, and the Singleplayer is alright compared to most of the Call of Duty games that have been released in recent years, so alltogeher, Call of Duty: Modern Warfare is a decent game.

    sadly the Multiplayer still features unfair battles for those that are unfortunate enough to have to face high-level enemies since thanks for the games leveling system you are    The Multiplayer is fun for a while, and the Singleplayer is alright compared to most of the Call of Duty games that have been released in recent years, so alltogeher, Call of Duty: Modern Warfare is a decent game.

    sadly the Multiplayer still features unfair battles for those that are unfortunate enough to have to face high-level enemies since thanks for the games leveling system you are most likely going to have a decent disadvantage, which leads to the game only being "decent" and not "good".    … Expand
  30. theonelog
    May 9, 2023
    6
    A (sometimes) fun, yet heavily flawed game. Infected got one of its best iterations in this title and we also got a pretty good campaign. Other than that, the rest of the multiplayer is mediocre at best and spec ops is a disaster.
prev
Page:

Awards & Rankings

65
#65 Best PC Game of 2019
2
#2 Most Discussed PC Game of 2019

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
81

Generally favorable reviews - based on 27 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 25 out of 27
  2. Mixed: 1 out of 27
  3. Negative: 1 out of 27
  1. Game World Navigator Magazine
    Dec 6, 2019
    81
    It’s hard to tell why there was so much ado about single-player campaign: controversial topics aside, it’s completely mediocre. On the other hand, the multiplayer mode is one of the best in latest instalments of Call of Duty series. [Issue#241, p.49]
  2. CD-Action
    Nov 25, 2019
    85
    It’s undeniably well-made albeit controversial part of the series. One that tries to break the mold and open itself to another kind of player. It’s worth of praise, even if just for that. I recommend it especially to Battlefield players – you may be pleasantly surprised. [13/2019, p.50]
  3. Riot Pixels
    Nov 11, 2019
    79
    Modern Warfare is not a stellar game, but decent first-person shooters about modern conflicts are so few and far between that it’s surprisingly satisfying.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »