- Publisher: Konami
- Release Date: Mar 11, 2011
- Also On: PlayStation 3, Xbox 360
User Score
Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 45 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 7 out of 45
-
Mixed: 4 out of 45
-
Negative: 34 out of 45
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
Oct 8, 2012
-
Mar 18, 2011Ok to kill time.. what you expect for the price. The graphics are okay the game is linear the dialogue is joke. The cut scenes are stills. I wasn't expecting much but I don't think I wasted the money.
-
May 11, 2011Wow, what a waste of money this game was. It last all of about an hour if you explore everything. I couldn't believe that it cost $10. I feel swindled.
As for the game, it's ok I suppose. I would've expected the cut-scenes to at least be animated. They're just cell-shaded cartoons. Don't buy this game and waste your money. -
May 24, 2011The cut scenes were terrible, the story line was short and boring, there is no multiplayer, and it was overpriced. This game was a complete waste of time just like the movie
-
May 20, 2011This game is not worth buying. It's cheap and the cut scenes are still. If you're planning to buy this, reconsider that decision. Like the movie, it's not worth watching or buying. Forget about buying the game and save up for something else that's worth.
-
Nov 2, 2011This game is a piece of **** nothing is good on this game, it's only created for cash during the release of the film. Do not buy it guy's. The life of the game is about 1-2 miserable hours. I repeat, don't buy it.
-
Nov 1, 2011Not sure about the entertainment factor but with that being said: You could probably go out and buy the film for cheaper in the bargain bin and it would certainly last longer than this would ever do. Nothing but a cheap cash in at making a bit of money of a not very good franchise to begin with.
-
Dec 30, 2013This game is actually pretty good, the graphics are pretty good and the game-play is your average FPS so in other words not bad. The game does end loosely and it is very short, only took me about an hour. But if this had a longer campaign and multiplayer this would be great. I would give this game a 7/10.
-
Nov 3, 2015Battle: Los Angeles is an entertaining FPS that can kill a little bit of your free time. I mean little bit because you literally can finish it in one seating.
-
Oct 26, 2016Only good thing about this game i can say that its playable and runs fine. The other is i have no bloody idea why anyone would waste their time and money making it...
-
Jun 3, 2017
-
May 15, 2023It is too short, I finished it in 3 hours, Graphics are good for its time and gameplay is not bad - 4/10
-
PC GamerJun 18, 2011Good grief--I could buy Half-Life 2 with that $10. [Aug 2011, p.76]
-
Jun 18, 2011Although the looks of Battle: Los Angeles are acceptable, the length of the game is not. The price doesn't justify the quality of the game and you'll find yourself longing for a good game even before you reach the end of this incredibly mediocre game, that doesn't even last two hours.
-
LEVEL (Czech Republic)May 22, 2011Battle: Los Angeles looks, plays and entertains as some Uwe Boll of game word took it and created it with the support of an enthusiastic circle of amateur programmers. [Issue#203]