1914 Shells of Fury

 PC
User Score
3.0

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 4 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 0 out of 4
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 4
  3. Negative: 4 out of 4
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. StuartD.
    Dec 11, 2007
    1
    Awful. Simply awful. Graphics that would have been dated 10 years ago (the original DOS Silent Hunter looked better than this). Awful AI. Stupid interface. Too bad. I wanted to like this game, simply because of the unique time period (WWI subsim). Perhaps someday UbiSoft will make a Silent Hunter V and cover the period. In any case, this game isn't it. If you want to try a subsim for Awful. Simply awful. Graphics that would have been dated 10 years ago (the original DOS Silent Hunter looked better than this). Awful AI. Stupid interface. Too bad. I wanted to like this game, simply because of the unique time period (WWI subsim). Perhaps someday UbiSoft will make a Silent Hunter V and cover the period. In any case, this game isn't it. If you want to try a subsim for $20, consider hunting down a copy of Silent Hunter III, or waiting for a price drop for Silent Hunter IV. Both will be far more entertaining than this piece of garbage.… Expand

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
tbd

No score yet - based on 3 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 0 out of 3
  2. Mixed: 1 out of 3
  3. Negative: 2 out of 3
  1. GameZone
    50
    A tentative little game without much depth.
    Read full review
  2. Game Chronicles
    49
    In summary, I'd say the biggest weakness with 1914 Shells of Fury is the feeling that you have little control over what happens.
    Read full review
  3. Gamers' Temple
    40
    Shells of Tedium would be a more appropriate title.
    Read full review