Wolfenstein 3D

 Game Boy Advance
User Score
6.9

Mixed or average reviews- based on 64 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 32 out of 64
  2. Mixed: 21 out of 64
  3. Negative: 11 out of 64
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Just_Some_Gamer
    Jun 25, 2017
    8
    Right, so, this is a great port. One of the best actually. It's Wolfenstein, so it's a 10 off the line.

    Loses a point for lacking music, and loses a point for disparate content (fewer weapons). I'd rate it lower or higher for it being portable but it's exempt of that scrutiny given that it's a legacy port essentially. What you see is what you get, and what you got was Wolfenstein 3D    Right, so, this is a great port. One of the best actually. It's Wolfenstein, so it's a 10 off the line.

    Loses a point for lacking music, and loses a point for disparate content (fewer weapons). I'd rate it lower or higher for it being portable but it's exempt of that scrutiny given that it's a legacy port essentially. What you see is what you get, and what you got was Wolfenstein 3D on the GBA in 2002.    … Expand
  2. SeriousDuke(GBAFPSexpert)
    Jul 7, 2004
    3
    The worst FPS available for the GBA is Wolfenstein 3D. It's not the worst by much, Medal of Honor: Underground is pretty darn close. Wolfenstein 3D was the fifth FPS released for the GBA but the first FPS ever to be released for any system. Bringing this title back from the dead probably wasn't such a good idea with games like Ecks Vs. Sever competeing with it. Doom and Duke The worst FPS available for the GBA is Wolfenstein 3D. It's not the worst by much, Medal of Honor: Underground is pretty darn close. Wolfenstein 3D was the fifth FPS released for the GBA but the first FPS ever to be released for any system. Bringing this title back from the dead probably wasn't such a good idea with games like Ecks Vs. Sever competeing with it. Doom and Duke Nukem were old games coming back to life on the GBA but those turned out so darn good. Those games featured beautiful graphics. Wolfenstein 3D's are just plain outdated and ugly, however not as ugly as Medal of Honor: Underground's. The game features the original 60 levels and 4 weapons. Only 4? Yes, I know, there were only 4 in the original but that is to little. This game is even outdated on the Game Boy. The game is still fun but there are a lot of better choices in the FPS genre for GBA. Trust me.… Expand
  3. Crimsonhead
    Oct 24, 2005
    2
    How come theres only 4 weapons? i remember playin a mac version which had lots of weapons like rocket launchers, flame throwers. they should have ported that version instead of this crappy one.
  4. Garedbi69
    Apr 8, 2018
    6
    We shouldn't judge the game too hard, yes i know it has A LOT of missing stuff but..how many did develop the game??? TWO PEOPLE MADE THIS GAME, THAT'S INSANE
  5. Hdjidje
    Apr 20, 2021
    7
    Is a really good port the only problem is the framerate wich can drop a lot of you have a lots of enemies in the screen, but is still a very enjoyable portable version of wolfenstein 3d

Awards & Rankings

87
#87 Best Game Boy Advance Game of 2002
34
#34 Most Discussed Game Boy Advance Game of 2002

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
57

Mixed or average reviews - based on 9 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 0 out of 9
  2. Mixed: 8 out of 9
  3. Negative: 1 out of 9
  1. Game Informer
    70
    With no multiplayer, however, Wolfenstein doesn't seem as attractive when compared to another classic GBA rerelease. [July 2002, p.93]
  2. Games Radar
    68
    With 66 levels, only four weapons and none of the cleverness of its Bam! brother "Ecks Vs Sever," this is one castle you won't be wanting to return to regularly. [GamesMaster]
    Read full review
  3. Nintendo Power
    64
    The confusing maze of 3-D hallways and rooms rotates and scales smoothly, while the sound effects are crude and rough. [July 2002, p.151]
See all critic reviews »