Medal of Honor Underground

 Game Boy Advance
User Score
1.7

Overwhelming dislike- based on 13 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1 out of 13
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 13
  3. Negative: 12 out of 13
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. SeriousDuke(GBAFPSexpert)
    Jul 7, 2004
    4
    Medal of Honor: Underground is the eleventh best (second to the worst) FPS for GBA and the ninth released for the system. Medal of Honor: Underground looked promising for the GBA because the PS One version was so good. When I turned on the game I thought it wasn't so bad. Cut me some slack, I'm only reading the mission briefing! After I was done reading, the game started. What Medal of Honor: Underground is the eleventh best (second to the worst) FPS for GBA and the ninth released for the system. Medal of Honor: Underground looked promising for the GBA because the PS One version was so good. When I turned on the game I thought it wasn't so bad. Cut me some slack, I'm only reading the mission briefing! After I was done reading, the game started. What the heck am I looking at? These graphics are horrible, some of the worst I've seen on GBA. I liked how the other reviewer worded it, It was like sticking a turd in your Game Boy cartridge slot and flipping the on switch! That's pretty much the only way I can describe how bad the graphics are! After a while you get used to the chunky graphics and sluggish control and realize, okay, it's not that bad. The game features a good story, neat cut-scenes and varied objectives. This gives it more depth than the garden-variety shooter, ahem . . . Doom. This is definitly one of the worst FPSs for the GBA. Beware of the graphics!… Expand
  2. Alex
    Nov 20, 2003
    1
    playing this game is like sticking a chunk of turd into your GBA. i could pull a better game from where the sun dont shine.
  3. LandorferHagenth:)
    Apr 18, 2003
    0
    Sh*ttiest game I'v ever player. Sorry, but it's true. Enemys make stupid comments and its full of bugs and bad textures. Can you belive it... I bought it for 64 DOLLARS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! boy... was I dissapointed. The game has only it's name :(
  4. NorisM.
    Jun 23, 2004
    10
    Its fun. the graphics arnt the best, but if i wanted good graphics, i would put my xbox in my car. it is a fun portable game.
  5. RockmanSnake
    Jul 21, 2004
    0
    This might be in the Medal of Honor game series, but this piece of crap is a dishonor to the franchise! The graphics suck! The environments are barely navigable, the people look like thin, pixelated tootpicks with clothes, limbs, and guns! It's hard, overall, as well, since you always get shot and its hard to get around to complete the boring objectives. It has a mind-numbingly slow This might be in the Medal of Honor game series, but this piece of crap is a dishonor to the franchise! The graphics suck! The environments are barely navigable, the people look like thin, pixelated tootpicks with clothes, limbs, and guns! It's hard, overall, as well, since you always get shot and its hard to get around to complete the boring objectives. It has a mind-numbingly slow framerate! When I purchased the game, I was expecting MoH gameplay, but it's practically (if not literally) gone now! Buy DooM and DooM II GBA instead. MoH Underground GBA sucks--'nuff said!!… Expand
  6. Guy
    Apr 17, 2007
    0
    For a while, I thought that the rocking PS one version could finally fit into a portable, convinient GBA, how wrong I was. The graphics aren't only terrible, but you can't even see where you're going! It's just a pathetic ripoff from the original.
  7. Edu
    Dec 3, 2002
    3
    It's full of bugs and very slow, actually the baddest FPS game...maybe the baddest game for GBA.
  8. FoxCritic
    Aug 10, 2022
    0
    What happened? It is hard to believe that an award-winning and respected franchise like Medal of Honor has done this authentic piece of garbage. While the PS1 version was great, this is the complete opposite. It was garbage when it was first released in 2002 -- the same year when Medal of Honor: Allied Assault and Frontline, masterpieces, were released -- and it is still an authentic pieceWhat happened? It is hard to believe that an award-winning and respected franchise like Medal of Honor has done this authentic piece of garbage. While the PS1 version was great, this is the complete opposite. It was garbage when it was first released in 2002 -- the same year when Medal of Honor: Allied Assault and Frontline, masterpieces, were released -- and it is still an authentic piece of stinky and soft ****… Expand

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
46

Generally unfavorable reviews - based on 5 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 0 out of 5
  2. Mixed: 1 out of 5
  3. Negative: 4 out of 5
  1. GameSpot
    55
    The graphics are bad, and they definitely kick the game down a couple of pegs.
    Read full review
  2. netjak
    48
    A sub-average game, thanks to the awful graphics and interface limitations of the handheld console.
  3. Nintendo Power
    46
    The frame rate suffers in the downsized version. [Aug 2002, p.146]
See all critic reviews »