Ray Conlogue
Select another critic »For 66 reviews, this critic has graded:
-
54% higher than the average critic
-
3% same as the average critic
-
43% lower than the average critic
On average, this critic grades 5.6 points lower than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Ray Conlogue's Scores
- Movies
- TV
| Average review score: | 60 | |
|---|---|---|
| Highest review score: | Nijinsky: The Diaries of Vaslav Nijinsky | |
| Lowest review score: | Never Again | |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 40 out of 66
-
Mixed: 14 out of 66
-
Negative: 12 out of 66
66
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
- Ray Conlogue
Although filmmaker Pan Nalin is a believer in Ayurveda,there is little in the film to convince anybody else.- The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
- Read full review
-
- Ray Conlogue
A bit like having a detached retina. One keeps blinking and trying to get it into focus, but it never quite does. What, one wonders, is this movie doing here?- The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
- Read full review
-
- Ray Conlogue
For those who don't know his (Lelouch's) work, And Now Ladies and Gentlemen will be fun because his style is unique and unpredictable. But for those who have known him in better form, this one is not a must-see.- The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
- Read full review
-
- Ray Conlogue
What's singular is that it was funded by the current Thai royal family and directed by a royal prince, Chatrichalerm Yukol.- The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
- Read full review
-
- Ray Conlogue
Isn't quite funny enough to make it as a comedy, or touching enough to make it as a romance. It's a pleasant effort that doesn't hit any of its targets.- The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
- Read full review
-
- Ray Conlogue
Like many of his (young) generation, Villeneuve is front and centre with the visual and musical language. He doesn't always hit the mark, but he is already trying for a symbolic allusiveness that is entirely beyond the reach of many filmmakers.- The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
- Read full review
-
- Ray Conlogue
It's an enjoyable film, carried along by the perennial strength of the story... But it won't have the staying power of the original.- The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
- Read full review
-
- Ray Conlogue
A formula flick. And the formula is not 51 times more entertaining than usual. Maybe 1.5, at best.- The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
- Read full review
-
- The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
- Read full review
-
- Ray Conlogue
In the end, a few genuinely funny moments aside, the script is simply too predictable and unvarying to earn the viewer's loyalty.- The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
- Read full review
-
- Ray Conlogue
None of this quite gets off the ground, and I found myself wanting to bid farewell to Yvan and Charlotte quite a while before the final credits rolled. Not every wannabe Woody Allen is Woody Allen.- The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
- Read full review
-
- Ray Conlogue
A mere action suspense adventure lacking the depths of the original. [14 July 1989]- The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
-
- Ray Conlogue
So it's a pretty faded experience. I suggest you get out the books, which for once can truly be said to be more spectacular than the movie.- The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
- Read full review
-
- Ray Conlogue
Director Carl Reiner has put it together so that the character (hardly) ever becomes boring, and the Martin-Carl Gottlieb-Michael Elias screenplay has just enough genuinely witty moments to keep the story rolling past its flat parts. What more can anyone say? If you like Steve Martin, you'll love this movie. If you don't, you'll laugh sometimes but wish you'd gone elsewhere. [17 Dec 1979]- The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
-
- The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
- Read full review
-
- Ray Conlogue
But there's no sign of the writerly derring-do that is really essential to daisy-chain storytelling. 200 Cigarettes burns itself out well before midnight.- The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
- Read full review
-
- Ray Conlogue
Perhaps too much energy was spent on being stylish rather than simply low-rent horrifying. The upshot is not very stylish and not very scary.- The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
- Read full review
-
- Ray Conlogue
It is, alas, très twee. A muchness of silliness. Beautifully filmed silliness, and fetchingly acted tweeness. But give me Cruella de Vil any time.- The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
- Read full review
-
- Ray Conlogue
There's an alchemy that can transform personal experience into a great film, but it was nowhere nearby when Tamara Jenkins wrote and directed this lacklustre first feature.- The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
- Read full review
-
- Ray Conlogue
A shoot-'em-up for cynical times. Its only asset is Seagal himself, and frankly, he's is getting a bit past it.- The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
- Read full review
-
- The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
-
- Ray Conlogue
Sinbad lacks, alas, the sparkle and inventiveness of the stories that inspired it.- The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
- Read full review
-
- Ray Conlogue
The difficulty with the film starts with the amount of improbability one must swallow. [24 Dec. 1998, p.D10]- The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
-
- Ray Conlogue
It uses violence as a drug, injecting it into the audience and hoping to addict it. Once the dependence is created, it is simple to feed it with formulaic films.- The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
- Read full review
-
- The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
- Read full review
-
- Ray Conlogue
Considering that the original story managed to be scarier without people's hair spontaneously restyling itself into dragons, it's worth asking why this kind of film has become the norm. Is it because filmgoers demand it, or is it because filmmakers leaning on technological crutches can't be bothered to learn their craft? More and more, I'm leaning to the latter. [23 July 1999, p.C3]- The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
-
- The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
- Read full review
-
- Ray Conlogue
Properly handled, any one of these characters could be made, just barely, believable. But here they simply go off, like rockets, exploding out of nowhere and racing across the screen, one after the other.- The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
- Read full review
-
- Ray Conlogue
It's a comic-book idea that might have been fun. But it's beyond the reach of first-time feature director Kevin Donovan, who squanders his main asset, Jackie Chan, and fumbles the vital action sequences.- The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
- Read full review
-
- Ray Conlogue
Think of it as trope grope. Things are so relatively democratic nowadays that filmmakers have to rummage through the past for a truly shmaltzy story. And they don't come any shmaltzier than this.- The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
- Read full review