Ray Conlogue
Select another critic »For 66 reviews, this critic has graded:
-
54% higher than the average critic
-
3% same as the average critic
-
43% lower than the average critic
On average, this critic grades 5.6 points lower than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Ray Conlogue's Scores
- Movies
- TV
| Average review score: | 60 | |
|---|---|---|
| Highest review score: | Nijinsky: The Diaries of Vaslav Nijinsky | |
| Lowest review score: | Never Again | |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 40 out of 66
-
Mixed: 14 out of 66
-
Negative: 12 out of 66
66
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
- Ray Conlogue
It's a comic-book idea that might have been fun. But it's beyond the reach of first-time feature director Kevin Donovan, who squanders his main asset, Jackie Chan, and fumbles the vital action sequences.- The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
- Read full review
-
- Ray Conlogue
Think of it as trope grope. Things are so relatively democratic nowadays that filmmakers have to rummage through the past for a truly shmaltzy story. And they don't come any shmaltzier than this.- The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
- Read full review
-
- Ray Conlogue
Patch Adams is a flawed visionary, but surely he deserves better than this crass and manipulative movie.- The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
- Read full review
-
- Ray Conlogue
Here is a truly unfunny comedy from Universal Studios, which seems determined to prove that Hollywood can be opportunistic and clueless at the same time.- The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
- Read full review
-
- Ray Conlogue
Rarely does a film so graceless and devoid of merit as this one come along.- The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
- Read full review
-
- The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
- Read full review
-
- Ray Conlogue
This is a film whose sunny and insipid storytelling style is at odds with its material.- The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
- Read full review
-
- Ray Conlogue
This is a miserable sequel to the modestly well-reviewed Final Destination.- The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
- Read full review
-
- Ray Conlogue
Considering that the original story managed to be scarier without people's hair spontaneously restyling itself into dragons, it's worth asking why this kind of film has become the norm. Is it because filmgoers demand it, or is it because filmmakers leaning on technological crutches can't be bothered to learn their craft? More and more, I'm leaning to the latter. [23 July 1999, p.C3]- The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
-
- Ray Conlogue
It's a turning-the-tables story a five-year-old could appreciate -- except for the confusing crowd scenes and haphazard camera work. Technically speaking, Waters' skills haven't improved much over the years.- The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
- Read full review
-
- The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
- Read full review
-
- Ray Conlogue
Properly handled, any one of these characters could be made, just barely, believable. But here they simply go off, like rockets, exploding out of nowhere and racing across the screen, one after the other.- The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
- Read full review