Pauline Kael
Select another critic »For 828 reviews, this critic has graded:
-
26% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
72% lower than the average critic
On average, this critic grades 2.8 points lower than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Pauline Kael's Scores
- Movies
- TV
| Average review score: | 63 | |
|---|---|---|
| Highest review score: | The Lavender Hill Mob | |
| Lowest review score: | Revolution | |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 372 out of 828
-
Mixed: 406 out of 828
-
Negative: 50 out of 828
828
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
- Pauline Kael
Uneven and often clumsy, yet with a distinctive satirical charm, the picture is full of misfits and faddists and social casualties.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
Jarmusch's passive style has its wit, but the style is deadening here until he brings in Roberto--a character out of folk humor. And without the boredom of the first three-quarters of an hour Roberto wouldn't be so funny.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
So inept you can't even get angry; it's like the imitations of sophisticated entertainment that high-school kids put on.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
The movie is part eerie Southern gothic and part Hollywood self-congratulation for its enlightened racial attitudes.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
Visually, it’s an original, bravura piece of moviemaking, with a weirdly ingenious vertical quality: the camera always seems to be moving up and down, rarely across.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
- Pauline Kael
A larger, slower, duller version of the spy thrillers [Hitchcock] made in the 30s.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
There are lapses in the continuity, and the picture is pushed toward a ready-made, theatre-of-the-absurd melodrama--the kind of instant fantasy that filled One From the Heart.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
So calculatedly cool and soulless and nastily erotic that it seems to belong to a new genre of virtuoso viciousness. What makes the movie unusual is the metallic elegance and the singleminded proficiency with which it adheres its sadism-for-the-connoisseur formula.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
It's a very simple and, in some ways, tawdry film, but Fellini shows his extraordinary talent for the dejected setting, the shabby performer, the fat old chorine, the singer who will never hit the high note.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
This one doesn't look too bad, but it has no snap, no tension. It's an exhausted movie.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
Nostalgic, affectionate Southern Americana out of Faulkner; the style is a little too "beguiling" but it's an awfully pleasant comedy anyway.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
Great as it undoubtedly is, it's not really a likable film; it's amazing, though--it keeps its freshness and its excitement, even if you resist its cartoon message.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
The hero is so blandly uninteresting that there's nothing to hold the movie together.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
The picture might have been a pop classic if it had stayed near the level of impudence that it reaches at its best. But about midway as Eddie has a crisis of confidence, and when Eddie locks his jaw and sets forth to become a purified man of integrity, the joy goes out of Newman's performance, which (despite the efforts of a lot of good actors) is the only life in the movie, except for a brief, startling performance by the 25-year-old black actor Forest Whitaker as a pool shark called Amos.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
Some exciting scenes in the first half, but the later developments are frenetic, and by the end the film is a loud and discordant mess.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
Plenty of shrewd commercial calculation went into concocting the right sugar coating for this story of an 11-year-old girl's painful maturation, but chemistry seems right. Laurice Elehwany's script neatly handles a number of details but on larger matters falls into predictable patterns.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
It’s no accident that you feel a sense of loss for each killer of the Bunch: Peckinpah has made them seem heroically, mythically alive on the screen.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
- Pauline Kael
Processed schlock. This could only have been designed as a TV movie and then blown up to cheapie-epic proportions.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
This Australia film - the pictorial re-creation of a late-Victorian novel - shows considerable charm and craft, though it's essentially taxidermy.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
After a few minutes of Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, I began to get that depressed feeling, and, after a half hour, felt rather offended...The director, George Roy Hill, doesn't have the style for it. The tone becomes embarrassing...George Roy Hill is a "sincere" director, but Goldman's script is jocose; though it reads as if it might play, it doesn't, and probably this is't just Hill's fault.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
Perhaps the most influential of all French films, and one of the most richly entertaining.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
The film isn't just about the widow -- it's about family, community, America, and Christian love. But Benton's gentle, nostalgic presentation muffles this. His craftsmanship is like an armor built up around his refusal to outrage or offend anyone; it's an encrusted gentility.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
An elegantly sinister scare movie, literate and expensive, with those two fine actresses Claire Bloom and Julie Harris.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
The kind of uplifting twaddle that traffics heavily in rather basic symbols: the gold light on the pond stands for the sunset of life, and so on and so on...A doddering valentine.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
This attempt at screwball charm was directed by Susan Seidelman, who wipes out her actors. All their responsiveness is cut off -- there's nothing going on in them. This flatness can make your jaw fall open, but it seems to be accepted by the audience as New Wave postmodernism.- The New Yorker
-
- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
The pictures is an almost total drag, though Agnes Moorehead, as the villainess, has a sensational exit through plate-glass windows.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
Sydney Pollack doesn't have a knack for action pulp; he gets some tension going in this expensive spy thriller, but there's no real fun in it.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
Silly, but with zest; there are some fine action sequences, and the performers seem to be enjoying their roles.- The New Yorker
-
- Pauline Kael
Raising Arizona is no big deal, but it has a rambunctious charm. The sunsets look marvelously ultra-vivid, the pain doesn't seem to be dry – it's like opening day of a miniature golf course. [20 Apr 1987, p.81]- The New Yorker