Pat Graham
Select another critic »For 50 reviews, this critic has graded:
-
32% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
66% lower than the average critic
On average, this critic grades 12.1 points lower than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Pat Graham's Scores
- Movies
- TV
| Average review score: | 53 | |
|---|---|---|
| Highest review score: | 'Round Midnight | |
| Lowest review score: | Solarbabies | |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 15 out of 50
-
Mixed: 25 out of 50
-
Negative: 10 out of 50
50
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
- Pat Graham
Pearce pads out his plot with lots of borrowed bits (notably from The 39 Steps, with Gere and Basinger as manacled fugitives), but the borrowings don't have any resonance of their own: they simply hang on the story like empty thematic husks.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Pat Graham
Nothing quite works as it should: the rhythms are subtly off, the pace is forced, the comedy overextended . . . and the surfeit of hommages—to the Keystone Kops and Laurel and Hardy and Jerry Lewis and all and sundry—threatens to sink it before it gets out of the starting gate. But there's something to be said for Edwards's insatiable overreaching, and at times the orchestration of pratfalls and comic pairings could hardly be more deft.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Pat Graham
It's easy to pick this emotional bunny rabbit apart—for the sentimental bathos, the literalism, the radiating wholesomeness (everything David Lynch parodied in Blue Velvet, down to the impeccable small-town streets and flowers framed against a screaming blue sky . . . only Castle gives it to you straight, without irony)—though what's remarkable here, and altogether rare, is the artifice and polish of Castle's studio-rooted style.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Pat Graham
Tinsel-thin seasonal folly (1945) about a newslady who has a GI hero over for Christmas dinner. Frolicsome in an artificially hearty sort of way, though it made its studio (Warners) a nice holiday bundle.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Pat Graham
You want misery? he gives you misery—dark, drear, suppurating medieval oppressiveness; monotony? he gives you that too, lots and lots of monotony; subhuman grotesquerie and primitive superstition? not to worry: this guy didn't direct Quest for Fire for nothing.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Pat Graham
It's not easy keeping track of all the contradictory tensions, and the film seems forever on the verge of spinning totally out of control, though whose control—Hunter's? Elmes's? anyone's?—it's hard to say. Still, it's more a success than a failure, if only because the confusions are so protean.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Pat Graham
The snickering humor that percolated through the Coens' debut, Blood Simple, is the whole show here, and it's damn near hysterical.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Pat Graham
The whole film seems ideologically forced and out of place, an attempt to resurrect the retentive virtues of Ford and Hawks without the cultural context that gave them expressive strength.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Pat Graham
Bolt's moralizing ironies (as leaden here as in A Man for All Seasons and assorted David Lean scenarios) are enough to sink a thousand war canoes, and Joffe doesn't help things along with his patronizing vision of native innocence: the Indians only exist to be sentimentalized—as angels, victims, and amiable rehab projects for enterprising Christians.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Pat Graham
As the silver-tongued romantic with the impossible nose load, Martin affects a sincerity that reminds you of Danny Kaye—funny enough, i guess, but I like the smarmy original a good deal more.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Pat Graham
Richard Fleischer’s professional efficiency tarts up a bit with dated 60s flashiness (multiple images, etc) and semidocumentary pretense in this 1968 feature about Boston sex murderer Albert De Salvo (Tony Curtis), brought to justice at last by police inspector Henry Fonda.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Pat Graham
The film slips occasionally into 80s action-itis and can't resist a few conventional friendship lessons, but most of the time it's fresh, funny, and surprising.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Pat Graham
Nobody knows how to speak, but they sure know how to apply makeup. [17 June 2010, p.63]- Chicago Reader
-
- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Pat Graham
They must've been working overtime on the Xerox machines at New World Pictures, since this 1986 women-behind-bars exploitation spoof sounds like a literal remake of 1983's Chained Heat (which was itself a remake of a remake of a remake).- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Pat Graham
It's an interesting experiment Cronenberg's attempted, if ultimately in the wrong direction.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Pat Graham
There aren't any flesh-and-blood characters here, only superimposed attitudes: it's almost like reading a rape-crisis textbook, with every lesson italicized.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Pat Graham
The plot is standard fantasy-adventure pulp, though director Joe Dante (Gremlins, Explorers) has so many screwball things going on in it that the comedy all but overwhelms the formulaic line of action.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Pat Graham
A second helping of horror tales inspired by an old 50s comic-book series. Original Creepshow director George Romero contributes the screenplay this time, basing it on some tastefully selected Stephen King morsels.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review