Michael Frank

Select another critic »
For 67 reviews, this critic has graded:
  • 38% higher than the average critic
  • 1% same as the average critic
  • 61% lower than the average critic
On average, this critic grades 1 point higher than other critics. (0-100 point scale)

Michael Frank's Scores

  • Movies
  • TV
Average review score: 67
Highest review score: 91 On Becoming a Guinea Fowl
Lowest review score: 33 The Starling
Score distribution:
  1. Positive: 45 out of 67
  2. Negative: 2 out of 67
67 movie reviews
    • 73 Metascore
    • 67 Michael Frank
    Fairyland is McNairy’s film. He ripped my heart out. He’ll likely do the same to the majority of viewers, leaving wet eyes and sniffling nose. Fairyland is McNairy’s to care for, to love, to let go. In return, he gives his greatest performance.
    • 69 Metascore
    • 67 Michael Frank
    This feature debut represents a big swing for the Chilean director, a thoughtful, deliberate drama bursting with ecological and personal imagery. A patient narrative rewarding the patient viewer, Cow‘s an abstract portrait of a family and environment in crisis.
    • 77 Metascore
    • 67 Michael Frank
    Bryon deserves the focus, yet the film never paints any broader strokes. Transition works because of that one person, but it cannot climb any further under these limitations.
    • 72 Metascore
    • 67 Michael Frank
    Coda, even with all of its imperfections, drives home a truckload of emotions in its final act, filled with more silence than noise.
    • 71 Metascore
    • 67 Michael Frank
    Wladyka’s film is always gripping, always searching, and always testing the boundaries of its protagonist and its audience.
    • 66 Metascore
    • 67 Michael Frank
    The built narrative struggles against the facts of its plot, unable to find rhythm in a fictionalized version of events. But none of it matters—Brown remains a remarkable figure, a complicated character to study, and impossible not to root for.
    • 78 Metascore
    • 67 Michael Frank
    A simple, yet beautiful film due to this sense of place, Luzzu highlights a story that’s rooted in tradition and particularity. At times, rushed in its quest to find a central conflict, the film finds Camilleri crafting a coarse story, one void of laughs, jokes, or levity.
    • 80 Metascore
    • 67 Michael Frank
    Johansen is a force despite this film’s flaws, undeniable in both charms and quirks. His talent remains emphatic, and his stage presence is enough for the camera to sit back and appreciate him. Being enigmatic yet accessible, Scorsese and Tedeschi must capture his substantial coolness. They succeed in spades.
    • 70 Metascore
    • 67 Michael Frank
    The Friend reminds us of the immeasurable role that dogs, and pets, play in our lives.
    • 69 Metascore
    • 67 Michael Frank
    LaRoy is the work of a director with unmistakable joy for this genre, approaching the material with a welcome earnestness.
    • 72 Metascore
    • 67 Michael Frank
    Because of the personal subject matter, Jessie Barr’s feature directing debut contains a multitude of sensitivity and care. A tenderness washes over the entire film, and even as Sophie makes unassured decisions, you want to support her.
    • 66 Metascore
    • 67 Michael Frank
    Brian and Charles didn’t need to be a feature. It could have continued to peacefully and joyfully exist as a short, and its material stretches the story thin as a sheet in this extended form. But the charm and fun of its story outweighs a scrawny narrative.
    • 62 Metascore
    • 67 Michael Frank
    Mark, Mary & Some Other People finds comfort and empathy in the story of two people still attempting to figure it out.
    • 72 Metascore
    • 67 Michael Frank
    Gorgeous to watch, with enough sly comedy to maintain levity, Fremont is notable in its decision to be small and intimate. It finds romance in everyday interactions, and in the easy pleasure of opening up a cookie and reading one’s fortune.
    • 73 Metascore
    • 58 Michael Frank
    Lucy and Desi won’t provide many surprises for those with a general understanding of Ball and Arnaz. It can look and sound like a paint-by-numbers documentary, with the trappings of any streamable film being churned out at major studios. Technically, it’s standard fare. Emotionally, it’s a beating heart—Poehler’s beating heart.
    • 47 Metascore
    • 58 Michael Frank
    Capturing a portion of that contrast, due to the closeness and interest of its subjects, The Mission moves beyond an optimistic portrait and into murkier territory, making for a more valuable document. If only Anderson went even further and muddied up the glassy waters.
    • 53 Metascore
    • 58 Michael Frank
    Sharp Stick is nothing short of singular. If it’s unlikely this project will gain the director any new fans, it represents another step into bold territory—even as quality dips and swerves, this is a project where it seems no notes were given, the kind of freedom that’s refreshing in today’s landscape.
    • 78 Metascore
    • 58 Michael Frank
    There’s not necessarily anything new in Parmet’s script, despite her care towards this character of Jem. The film lacks surprise, and in this case, is missing a level of engagement.
    • 55 Metascore
    • 58 Michael Frank
    Showalter made a bright, fun, pleasing film, colorful in both character, tone, and picture. I just wish it had a bit more criticism, a little more outrage, in its bones.
    • 72 Metascore
    • 58 Michael Frank
    If one can get past the exaggerated nature of The Beta Test, there’s much to glean from its mixture of laughs and critiques. Come for the mystery, stay for the study of society by two white guys playing absolute assholes. Even if that study reaches farther than it can grasp.
    • 59 Metascore
    • 58 Michael Frank
    Italian Studies disorients the viewer for an experience that has moments of singularity, though it can’t hide from its disjointed nature. But it’s different, and that has definitive value.
    • 49 Metascore
    • 58 Michael Frank
    The Treasure of Foggy Mountain, like other SNL features that have come before it, runs long, losing the initial charm of its leads and the interplay that make Please Don’t Destroy’s skits funny instead of exhausting. The comedy troupe might have a great comedy in them; this isn’t it.
    • 56 Metascore
    • 50 Michael Frank
    Englert’s first feature isn’t low on creativity, but visibly lacks cohesion. It’s difficult to connect to, disparate in its own storytelling, mood, and tone. It’s an audacious script and directorial vision, falling short.
    • 63 Metascore
    • 50 Michael Frank
    More than just misunderstood, his characters are underwritten and underserved. Thus the expected emotion never arrives. The gut punch never comes, even as music swells. All of this fear fizzles; message, story, and figures become transient. It starts with so much promise, only to end as a letdown–like waiting for the end of the world only for the storm to pass.
    • 56 Metascore
    • 50 Michael Frank
    Jamojaya has the bones to be a good film, possibly even a great one. Its director’s insistence on style turns that potential into mediocrity, ending with a film that’s passable at best. It leaves audiences with indifference––nothing more.
    • 71 Metascore
    • 50 Michael Frank
    Levinson captures a difficulty that’s unknown for anyone other than those who lived through the atrocities of concentration camps. He allows cruelty to hiss off the screen but adds little more than the pain.
    • 40 Metascore
    • 50 Michael Frank
    Statham is continually up to the challenge, kicking, punching, and fighting people and sharks alike. He’s on a run of mid-tier movies unlike anyone else in Hollywood, and once he gets going, jet-skiing around an island taking on three megs, the film finally transforms into pure entertainment.
    • 51 Metascore
    • 50 Michael Frank
    For Forster and his leading man, the drama is a step down from previous work, an emotionally telegraphed, near-manipulative adaptation of a better book already adapted in Sweden to far greater results.
    • 42 Metascore
    • 50 Michael Frank
    There are flashes of enjoyment and clarity, mostly within the home shared by Linda and Paxton, with Hathaway and Ejiofor showing their chemistry and their willingness to commit to the project.
    • 73 Metascore
    • 50 Michael Frank
    Futura lives in the past and the present, not the future––attempting to say much more about what has made these people this way, not what they will do about it. For all of the talk about the future, this documentary has nothing insightful to say about it.

Top Trailers