Jonathan Rosenbaum
Select another critic »For 1,935 reviews, this critic has graded:
-
42% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
56% lower than the average critic
On average, this critic grades 4.1 points lower than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Jonathan Rosenbaum's Scores
- Movies
- TV
| Average review score: | 62 | |
|---|---|---|
| Highest review score: | Breathless | |
| Lowest review score: | Bad Boys | |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 961 out of 1935
-
Mixed: 744 out of 1935
-
Negative: 230 out of 1935
1935
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
- Jonathan Rosenbaum
Gondry is a soft surrealist without much of a sociopolitical agenda, closer to Dr. Seuss than Luis Buñuel,- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Jonathan Rosenbaum
However one chooses to take its jaundiced view of history, it's probably the best film to date by the talented Kusturica (Time of the Gypsies, Arizona Dream), a triumph of mise en scene mated to a comic vision that keeps topping its own hyperbole.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Jonathan Rosenbaum
It's hard to deny that Marlon Brando's performance as a dock worker and ex-fighter who finally decides to rat on his gangster brother (Rod Steiger) is pretty terrific.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Jonathan Rosenbaum
This 1962 thriller is better than the Scorsese remake—above all for Robert Mitchum's chilling performance as a vengeful ex-con and an overall brute force in the crude story line—though it's arguably still some distance from deserving its reputation as a classic.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Jonathan Rosenbaum
Nevertheless, the cast of mainly unknowns is so good, and Linklater is so adept at playing them off one another, that the two-hour running time never seems overextended.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Jonathan Rosenbaum
Fresh and edgy; the images of a wasted London and the details of a paramilitary organization in the countryside are both creepy and persuasive.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Jonathan Rosenbaum
This isn't the supreme masterpiece it might have been, but Nichols's direction is very polished and some of the lines and details are awfully funny.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Jonathan Rosenbaum
If it speaks with a quieter voice than many of Bogdanovich's early pictures, what it has to say seems substantially more personal and thoughtful.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Jonathan Rosenbaum
Don't expect any psychological depth here, but the cool wit and fun... are deftly maintained, and Sonnenfeld provides a bountiful supply of both fanciful beasties and ingenious visuals.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Jonathan Rosenbaum
If you want to know what the Warhol scene was all about, this is even better than the documentaries.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Jonathan Rosenbaum
The performances are strong (my favorite is Deborah Harry as an older waitress) and the sense of eroded as well as barely articulated lives is palpable.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Jonathan Rosenbaum
Though it comes across as labored in spots, it also yields a good many beautiful and suggestive moments, and an overall film experience of striking originality.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Jonathan Rosenbaum
The script runs out of ideas long before he does, and the film doesn't build dramatically as much as it could. But it's an impressive debut, full of bizarre imagination and visual flair—a must for fans of offbeat horror films.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Jonathan Rosenbaum
David Mackenzie, who directed the remarkable Scottish drama "Young Adam" (2003), delivers another masterful, disturbing tale of illicit passion, erotic obsession, and sudden death set in the 1950s.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Jonathan Rosenbaum
Unfortunately, a conclusion stuffed with so many improbabilities that it left me gaping in disbelief. Prior to that, this is pretty much fun.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Jonathan Rosenbaum
Despite the sudsy, overlit look of William A. Fraker's cinematography and Downey's varying success with sight gags, this is still a lot of fun. An additional kicker is provided by the picture's crazed doublethink morality, which implies that incest is OK as long as you've got amnesia.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Jonathan Rosenbaum
Some of the most exhilarating camera movements and most luscious black-and-white cinematography you’ll ever see inhabit this singular, delirious 141-minute communist propaganda epic of 1964, a Cuban-Russian production poorly received in both countries at the time (in Cuba it was often referred to as “I Am Not Cuba”).- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Jonathan Rosenbaum
Despite the flashback structure, this is a film in which mood matters more than plot, while the hero's heroic stature steadily shrinks.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Jonathan Rosenbaum
What emerges is a powerhouse thriller full of surprises, original touches, and rare political lucidity, including an impressive performance by Jeff Goldblum as a Jewish yuppie gangster.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Jonathan Rosenbaum
Roman Polanski's first film in English (1965, 105 min.) is still his scariest and most disturbing--not only for its evocations of sexual panic, but also because his masterful employment of sound puts the audience's imagination to work in numerous ways...As narrative this works only part of the time, and as case study it may occasionally seem too pat, but as subjective nightmare it's a stunning piece of filmmaking.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Jonathan Rosenbaum
There's something almost wearying as well as exhilarating about the perpetual brilliance of Bosnian-born filmmaker Emir Kusturica.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Jonathan Rosenbaum
Volatile and sometimes daring performances by Catherine Deneuve, Gerard Depardieu, Gilbert Melki, Malik Zidi, and Lubna Azabal (as twins) contribute to the highly charged and novelistic experience.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Jonathan Rosenbaum
It illustrates the truism that the biggest difference between European and American directors using America as a site for fantasies is that the Europeans are likelier to know what they're doing.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review