Jonathan Foreman

Select another critic »
For 546 reviews, this critic has graded:
  • 42% higher than the average critic
  • 4% same as the average critic
  • 54% lower than the average critic
On average, this critic grades 9.8 points lower than other critics. (0-100 point scale)

Jonathan Foreman's Scores

  • Movies
  • TV
Average review score: 56
Highest review score: 100 Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon
Lowest review score: 0 Zombie! vs. Mardi Gras
Score distribution:
546 movie reviews
    • 48 Metascore
    • 50 Jonathan Foreman
    It's perfectly entertaining (and well-executed) in its cute, undemanding way.
    • New York Post
    • 48 Metascore
    • 38 Jonathan Foreman
    The contrast between Chan's charm and physical prowess and Tucker's lack of same is even more dramatic in this tiresome, leaden sequel.
    • 48 Metascore
    • 63 Jonathan Foreman
    The gleeful teen-horror spoof that proves that the Farrelly brothers have no monopoly on outrageous, politically incorrect comedy.
    • 48 Metascore
    • 38 Jonathan Foreman
    A shame that this indie's willingness to trade in stereotype leaves a sour taste in your mouth.
    • New York Post
    • 48 Metascore
    • 63 Jonathan Foreman
    One of the most thrilling - and authentic - mountain-climbing films in recent memory. Unfortunately, it's also burdened by one of those every-line-a-wretched-cliché Hollywood screenplays.
    • 48 Metascore
    • 50 Jonathan Foreman
    There's not a moment in it that feels fresh or authentic or inspired. But neither is it offensive.
    • 48 Metascore
    • 38 Jonathan Foreman
    In any case, the presence of O'Hara, Kline, Ramis, Black, Tomlin and John Lithgow (who plays Shaun's father) serve mainly to underline the feebleness of the screenplay and the slackness of the direction.
    • 48 Metascore
    • 63 Jonathan Foreman
    Perfectly enjoyable swashbuckling, eye-catching entertainment.
    • 48 Metascore
    • 50 Jonathan Foreman
    xXx
    Pumped-up, dumbed-down Bond, with tattoos instead of brains.
    • 47 Metascore
    • 63 Jonathan Foreman
    Adequately funny but predictable sitcom
    • 47 Metascore
    • 50 Jonathan Foreman
    It's a film pregnant with comic possibility that ought to be much funnier than it is.
    • 47 Metascore
    • 38 Jonathan Foreman
    Takeshi's elliptical directorial style here is overwhelmed by the script's crudeness and lack of narrative power.
    • 47 Metascore
    • 38 Jonathan Foreman
    Boring and irritating, and also mildly offensive in its ignorant depiction of both Judaism and Catholicism.
    • 47 Metascore
    • 63 Jonathan Foreman
    Long stretches of Mike Figgis' film are jaw-droppingly pretentious or painfully dull... Nevertheless, there are clever, funny, erotic and visually beautiful moments scattered throughout the film.
    • 47 Metascore
    • 63 Jonathan Foreman
    Though shamelessly derivative and amoral, The Girl Next Door is nevertheless funnier and smarter than most of the pathetic dreck aimed at the nation's teens.
    • 47 Metascore
    • 38 Jonathan Foreman
    Despite its talented and/or attractive cast, Heartbreakers is an ugly movie: The kind that makes you feel slightly soiled afterwards.
    • New York Post
    • 47 Metascore
    • 25 Jonathan Foreman
    This crude, deeply dishonest documentary does no such thing. David Russell's fictional "Three Kings" does a much better job.
    • 47 Metascore
    • 38 Jonathan Foreman
    Every good joke in the movie is to be found in those trailers.
    • New York Post
    • 47 Metascore
    • 50 Jonathan Foreman
    There are some decent jokes along the way. And none of the performances is bad. But they are limited by the script, which allows each character only one comic note.
    • 47 Metascore
    • 50 Jonathan Foreman
    The documentary equivalent of a Southern Gothic novel.
    • 47 Metascore
    • 12 Jonathan Foreman
    Part of the problem is that the Finbar character is both underdeveloped and unattractive - you don't get a sense of why anyone would miss him, let alone go searching for him in the snow. [17 Mar 2000]
    • New York Post
    • 46 Metascore
    • 25 Jonathan Foreman
    There is something offensively lazy about the thinness of the Jaglom's movie-industry characters, the simplistic problems they face, and the clumps of clumsy, apparently improvised dialogue they have to deliver.
    • New York Post
    • 46 Metascore
    • 50 Jonathan Foreman
    Not entirely bereft of chuckles, though it misses one comic opportunity after another (the best jokes are in the trailer).
    • 46 Metascore
    • 75 Jonathan Foreman
    Much less mawkish and predictable than you might expect.
    • New York Post
    • 46 Metascore
    • 25 Jonathan Foreman
    It's a film noir spoof, replete with hard-boiled narration, lounge-music soundtrack and dramatic black-and-white photography.
    • 46 Metascore
    • 12 Jonathan Foreman
    A strong, early candidate for the worst movie of the year.
    • New York Post
    • 46 Metascore
    • 50 Jonathan Foreman
    A slack-paced, surprisingly bland affair, filled with jokes that sound like they should be funny but aren't.
    • New York Post
    • 46 Metascore
    • 50 Jonathan Foreman
    One of those exercises in romantic whimsy that misses its mark: It's alternately sappy and uncomfortably harsh.
    • 46 Metascore
    • 63 Jonathan Foreman
    By far the best and cutest thing about How the Grinch Stole Christmas is the dog Max.
    • New York Post
    • 46 Metascore
    • 75 Jonathan Foreman
    It isn't particularly subtle or original. But it's a good-natured late-summer romp fueled by Lawrence's manic shtick.
    • New York Post

Top Trailers