Jonathan Foreman
Select another critic »For 546 reviews, this critic has graded:
-
42% higher than the average critic
-
4% same as the average critic
-
54% lower than the average critic
On average, this critic grades 9.8 points lower than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Jonathan Foreman's Scores
- Movies
- TV
| Average review score: | 56 | |
|---|---|---|
| Highest review score: | Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon | |
| Lowest review score: | Zombie! vs. Mardi Gras | |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 285 out of 546
-
Mixed: 103 out of 546
-
Negative: 158 out of 546
546
movie
reviews
-
- Jonathan Foreman
It's perfectly entertaining (and well-executed) in its cute, undemanding way.- New York Post
-
- Jonathan Foreman
The contrast between Chan's charm and physical prowess and Tucker's lack of same is even more dramatic in this tiresome, leaden sequel.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
- Jonathan Foreman
The gleeful teen-horror spoof that proves that the Farrelly brothers have no monopoly on outrageous, politically incorrect comedy.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
- Jonathan Foreman
A shame that this indie's willingness to trade in stereotype leaves a sour taste in your mouth.- New York Post
-
- Jonathan Foreman
One of the most thrilling - and authentic - mountain-climbing films in recent memory. Unfortunately, it's also burdened by one of those every-line-a-wretched-cliché Hollywood screenplays.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
- Jonathan Foreman
There's not a moment in it that feels fresh or authentic or inspired. But neither is it offensive.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
- Jonathan Foreman
In any case, the presence of O'Hara, Kline, Ramis, Black, Tomlin and John Lithgow (who plays Shaun's father) serve mainly to underline the feebleness of the screenplay and the slackness of the direction.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
- New York Post
- Read full review
-
- New York Post
- Read full review
-
- New York Post
- Read full review
-
- Jonathan Foreman
It's a film pregnant with comic possibility that ought to be much funnier than it is.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
- Jonathan Foreman
Takeshi's elliptical directorial style here is overwhelmed by the script's crudeness and lack of narrative power.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
- Jonathan Foreman
Boring and irritating, and also mildly offensive in its ignorant depiction of both Judaism and Catholicism.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
- Jonathan Foreman
Long stretches of Mike Figgis' film are jaw-droppingly pretentious or painfully dull... Nevertheless, there are clever, funny, erotic and visually beautiful moments scattered throughout the film.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
- Jonathan Foreman
Though shamelessly derivative and amoral, The Girl Next Door is nevertheless funnier and smarter than most of the pathetic dreck aimed at the nation's teens.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
- Jonathan Foreman
Despite its talented and/or attractive cast, Heartbreakers is an ugly movie: The kind that makes you feel slightly soiled afterwards.- New York Post
-
- Jonathan Foreman
This crude, deeply dishonest documentary does no such thing. David Russell's fictional "Three Kings" does a much better job.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
- New York Post
-
- Jonathan Foreman
There are some decent jokes along the way. And none of the performances is bad. But they are limited by the script, which allows each character only one comic note.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
- New York Post
- Read full review
-
- Jonathan Foreman
Part of the problem is that the Finbar character is both underdeveloped and unattractive - you don't get a sense of why anyone would miss him, let alone go searching for him in the snow. [17 Mar 2000]- New York Post
-
- Jonathan Foreman
There is something offensively lazy about the thinness of the Jaglom's movie-industry characters, the simplistic problems they face, and the clumps of clumsy, apparently improvised dialogue they have to deliver.- New York Post
-
- Jonathan Foreman
Not entirely bereft of chuckles, though it misses one comic opportunity after another (the best jokes are in the trailer).- New York Post
- Read full review
-
- New York Post
-
- Jonathan Foreman
It's a film noir spoof, replete with hard-boiled narration, lounge-music soundtrack and dramatic black-and-white photography.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
- New York Post
-
- Jonathan Foreman
A slack-paced, surprisingly bland affair, filled with jokes that sound like they should be funny but aren't.- New York Post
-
- Jonathan Foreman
One of those exercises in romantic whimsy that misses its mark: It's alternately sappy and uncomfortably harsh.- New York Post
- Read full review
-
- Jonathan Foreman
By far the best and cutest thing about How the Grinch Stole Christmas is the dog Max.- New York Post
-
- Jonathan Foreman
It isn't particularly subtle or original. But it's a good-natured late-summer romp fueled by Lawrence's manic shtick.- New York Post