Glenn Kenny
Select another critic »For 1,916 reviews, this critic has graded:
-
51% higher than the average critic
-
5% same as the average critic
-
44% lower than the average critic
On average, this critic grades 0.5 points lower than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Glenn Kenny's Scores
- Movies
- TV
| Average review score: | 65 | |
|---|---|---|
| Highest review score: | Shadow | |
| Lowest review score: | Hillary's America: The Secret History of the Democratic Party | |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 1,187 out of 1916
-
Mixed: 470 out of 1916
-
Negative: 259 out of 1916
1916
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
- Glenn Kenny
Overall this remarkably glum, logy, convoluted and unengaging movie has only a vestigial relation to McCay’s work. McCay fans should beware. So should everyone else.- The New York Times
- Posted Nov 17, 2022
- Read full review
-
- Glenn Kenny
Even if you can sense the fun Crowe is having with the camera setups in certain scenes, Poker Face is simultaneously a lot and not all that much.- RogerEbert.com
- Posted Nov 16, 2022
- Read full review
-
- Glenn Kenny
The film, directed by Jason Kohn (“Manda Bala” and “Love Means Zero”), turns the slogan “a diamond is forever” on its head with its title. Which is not about the durability of a diamond itself, but about the diamond market, which is being roiled by the high volume, and high quality, of synthetic diamonds.- RogerEbert.com
- Posted Nov 11, 2022
- Read full review
-
- Glenn Kenny
The movie’s generic quality is spruced up by eccentric plots points (go-go dancers who also serve as undercover eco-activists, a nice Andy Sidaris-like touch) and kooky dialogue.- The New York Times
- Posted Nov 10, 2022
- Read full review
-
- Glenn Kenny
Utama sounds a warning even as it casts a spell, and the spell is one of life and death and eternal returns and never-ending struggles, and the rest we can try to take when the work is done for the day.- RogerEbert.com
- Posted Nov 4, 2022
- Read full review
-
- Glenn Kenny
There are revealing glimpses into the early work of artists who would morph into entities that were slicker and ostensibly cooler.- The New York Times
- Posted Nov 4, 2022
- Read full review