Dave Kehr
Select another critic »For 1,651 reviews, this critic has graded:
-
39% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
59% lower than the average critic
On average, this critic grades 6.3 points lower than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Dave Kehr's Scores
- Movies
- TV
| Average review score: | 59 | |
|---|---|---|
| Highest review score: | The Good, the Bad and the Ugly | |
| Lowest review score: | Superbabies: Baby Geniuses 2 | |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 719 out of 1651
-
Mixed: 703 out of 1651
-
Negative: 229 out of 1651
1651
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
- Dave Kehr
The failure of director-writer Peter Hyams to put any weight whatever behind the moral issues (crude as they are) makes this merely violent nonsense.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Dave Kehr
The picture seems deliberately trite, blunt, and manipulative, as if the producers didn't trust their audience to respond to anything else.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Dave Kehr
Well, it really is a stinker, a compendium of The Deer Hunter's weaknesses (of plotting, narration, dialogue, and character) with few of its lyrical strengths.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Dave Kehr
Jessica Lange brings so much energy and personal involvement to her portrayal of Frances Farmer that you can't help but feel sorry for her; nothing else in the film remotely matches her talent and dedication, and she seems alone—and even slightly absurd—in her feverish creativity.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Dave Kehr
Overcalculated, thoroughly false humanist mush—one of those “real movies about real people” without a single authentic moment.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Dave Kehr
Cary Medoway uses backlighting and spatially distorting lenses to give the film the hyped-up look of a rock video, but his handling of actors is so inept that he must rely on the rock score to make the most basic emotional points.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Dave Kehr
Despite all the anguished huffing and puffing, there isn't a single authentic moment in it, and all you're left with in the end is the fading memory of two overscaled, Oscar-bait performances.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Dave Kehr
Even Neil Simon fans (and they do exist, believe it or not) will probably be bummed out by this stunningly unfunny 1976 parody of detective films.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Dave Kehr
Carpenter's direction is slow, dark, and stately; he seems to be aiming for an enveloping, novelistic kind of effect, but all he gets is heaviness.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Dave Kehr
Though we are largely spared Leonard Nimoy's stentorian presence as a performer, we must endure his miscalculations as a director: the dialogue scenes are often hilariously turgid; the action scenes—when Nimoy can be bothered to descend from his podium and film them—are zanily maladroit.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Dave Kehr
Remains a sadly earthbound thing, mired in a dismal realism that lies far from its natural environment.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
- Dave Kehr
Franklin J. Shaffner's deadpan adaptation of Ira Levin's silly story about Hitler clones. The plot is less suspenseful than the overacting contest between the two leads, Laurence Olivier and Gregory Peck, who spend most of their screen time one-upping each other in affectations.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Dave Kehr
Richard Marquand's dull, literal direction takes all the edge off this variant on the “Will he kiss her or kill her?” formula.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Dave Kehr
A ski party movie in which the clothes are a little more revealing than they were 35 years ago, the practical jokes are a little more tasteless, and the uncertainty over sex is pretty much nonexistent.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
- Dave Kehr
Tricked up with an elaborate flashback structure, subtitled dialogue in three languages and as many gratuitous aesthetic touches as the traffic will bear, Proteus emerges as a heavy, pretentious and derivative film.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
- Dave Kehr
Some kind of equality has been achieved when it is impossible to distinguish heterosexual clichés from homosexual ones.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
- Dave Kehr
Young French director Luc Besson (Le dernier combat) aims for a little American slickness in this relentlessly empty action film: it zooms along from one arbitrary sequence to the next, and its only aim is to keep the audience pumped up with kinetic stimulation.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Dave Kehr
Mr. Girod is a fish out of water in the after-hours clubs and deserted industrial districts that constitute the sexual underworld of Brussels. His film feels more like what one would see from the top of a double-decker tourist bus than the work of someone who has immersed himself in a sexual subculture and its particular values.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
- Dave Kehr
Starts on a note of relative naturalism and under Mr. La Salle's nuanced direction gradually becomes more and more unhinged until it concludes in an altogether different genre.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
- Dave Kehr
This big-budget bubble-gum musical is appalling but compulsively watchable; it's the perfect crystallization of a 13-year-old girl's taste, circa 1980, complete with roller discos, dreamy boys, fashion shows, and fantasy father figures. Director Robert Greenwald has a lot of ideas, all of them bad: his style could be described as rapid misfire.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Dave Kehr
Quickly collapses into an overloaded, slow-moving series of predictable jokes and forced situations.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
- Dave Kehr
It's a rare sequel that fritters away the appeal of the original so completely: within minutes, this continuation of Romancing the Stone has reduced the Kathleen Turner-Michael Douglas couple to a nightmare pairing of the gushingly idiotic and the sourly venal.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Dave Kehr
First-rate schlock; overlong and incredibly stupid, but that's part of the formula by now.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Dave Kehr
The low point is a New York sequence in which Waterston puts some Puccini on his stereo, pops his personal (custom-made?) videocassette of Cambodian atrocities into his video recorder, and goes into a heavy voice-over recounting the crimes of Amerika. Didacticism doesn't get much cruder than this, yet the emphasis of the sequence is on Waterston's exquisitely tortured conscience—it's there to demonstrate the profound, compassionate depths of his humanity.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Dave Kehr
The results, to judge from the examples here, have been stuffy and disappointing, an unholy alliance between Playboy Channel prurience and PBS cultural alibis.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
- Dave Kehr
Having made the mad mistake of selecting the project, screenwriters Dan O'Bannon and Don Jakoby and director Tobe Hooper seem utterly baffled by it; they hesitate between camping it up (and thus destroying a film for which they have an obvious affection) and trying to recapture Menzies's sublimely naive presentation (which, 80s hipsters that they are, they can't sustain for long).- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Dave Kehr
The bucketloads of sanctimonious message mongering ladled on by director Peter Hyams still can't disguise the sheerly mercenary basis of this 1986 project, a wholly uncalled-for sequel to Stanley Kubrick's 2001.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Dave Kehr
The murder-mystery board game becomes a frantic, unfunny spoof (1985) under the direction of British TV writer Jonathan Lynn. The script recycles Agatha Christie's Ten Little Indians, with six guests invited by a mysterious host to spend the night in a creepy mansion, but instead of parodying the material Lynn simply surrounds it with extraneous pratfalls and wisecracks.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Dave Kehr
Mr. Piccirillo's direction reflects a basic knowledge of stagecraft but no discernable sense of filmmaking. The dull television-style close-ups march relentlessly across the screen, leaving only the ghostly trails of badly transferred video images behind.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
- The New York Times
- Read full review