Wall Street Journal's Scores
- Movies
- TV
For 3,947 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
44% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
54% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 2.7 points lower than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 62
| Highest review score: | Les Misérables | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | The Limits of Control |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 2,103 out of 3947
-
Mixed: 1,198 out of 3947
-
Negative: 646 out of 3947
3947
movie
reviews
-
- Critic Score
Ms. Wood, who made a potent impression two years ago as a naïve adolescent led astray by a sophisticated and psychotic classmate in "Thirteen," has the whip hand this time around -- and she's wonderfully persuasive. She needs a movie to match.- Wall Street Journal
-
-
Reviewed by
Joe Morgenstern
The movie on the whole is joyless. Whatever Works doesn’t.- Wall Street Journal
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Joe Morgenstern
Extraordinary Measures requires extraordinary tolerance for bathos, bombast and plain old unpleasantness.- Wall Street Journal
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Joe Morgenstern
If less is more, Uncharted must be a masterpiece. It’s bloodless, heartless, joyless, sexless and, with one exception, charmless. The exception is Tom Holland, but what’s he doing in a slapdash action adventure adapted from a videogame? Making money, of course—gamers will flock.- Wall Street Journal
- Posted Feb 23, 2022
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Joe Morgenstern
The last thing we need is entertainment that evokes the horror and then trivializes it with cheesy heroics. Never has a movie taken on a subject of greater immediacy, or handled it more ineptly.- Wall Street Journal
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
Except for one terrifically adroit sequence in a subway, there is nothing understated about The Invasion. With all the shoot-outs, the screaming, the chases, collisions and fireballs, there isn't much time for storytelling.- Wall Street Journal
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Joe Morgenstern
The only rewards, and they are real albeit insufficient, involve watching Jane Fonda in full cry and Catherine Keener in a quieter fullness of feeling.- Wall Street Journal
- Posted Jun 7, 2012
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Joe Morgenstern
Good fun -- more fun than in the original -- punctuated by some lines of admirable awfulness.- Wall Street Journal
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Joe Morgenstern
The battles to save the world are generic/titanic; the villain is a bloodless bore with a boom-box roar; and the screen, like the ragged story, is chockablock with such underdeveloped overachievers as Batman, Wonder Woman, Aquaman, Cyborg and the Flash.- Wall Street Journal
- Posted Nov 16, 2017
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Joe Morgenstern
Before Firewall crumbles into foolishness, Harrison Ford and Paul Bettany make an oft-recycled plot look like a stylish model that just rolled out of a showroom.- Wall Street Journal
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Joe Morgenstern
Mr. Brooks manages to be deeply loathsome -- no small feat for a film that's shallowly amateurish.- Wall Street Journal
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Wall Street Journal
-
-
Reviewed by
Joe Morgenstern
Mark Andrus's script is built on soggy sandstone, and Irwin Winkler's bulldozer direction keeps unearthing toxic epiphanies. That's not to say the movie isn't occasionally moving, as well as exasperating.- Wall Street Journal
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Joe Morgenstern
Mr. Samuell's stylistic revelries are meant as comments on the conventions and excesses of movie romance, but his approach is glib and self-congratulatory. No feelings dwell beneath the layers upon layers of faux-naïve artifice. I dare you to sit through this movie and not wish you were somewhere else.- Wall Street Journal
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Joe Morgenstern
The movie stands as a genuine offense against the venerable and indispensable institution of satire.- Wall Street Journal
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Joe Morgenstern
The IMAX print I saw was so murky as to make you give thanks for the few scenes shot in simple sunlight, the 3-D wasn't worth the bother, and never before have I wanted to chloroform an entire orchestra.- Wall Street Journal
- Posted May 19, 2011
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Joe Morgenstern
The psychodynamics may well be sound, but the problem is that Léa and François, whether in or out of bed, are much more appealing than Roland and Vanessa. The camera is in the wrong room.- Wall Street Journal
- Posted Nov 12, 2015
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Wall Street Journal
-
-
Reviewed by
Joe Morgenstern
Ms. Blanchett can do no wrong, and does none here, though the movie around her, a popcorn-worthy sequel to the 1998 "Elizabeth," often lapses into opacity or grandiosity.- Wall Street Journal
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Joe Morgenstern
The whole dumb movie is a baloney cake, but the enticing icing on it is Reese Witherspoon, who manages to have a few moments of spontaneous fun in this half-baked store-bought comedy.- Wall Street Journal
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
It's beautiful to watch, but it doesn't cover very much ground. Sumptuously appointed, meticulously detailed, the film sallies forth - and sags. [06 Apr 1995]- Wall Street Journal
-
-
Reviewed by
Joe Morgenstern
At a time when so many movies look alike, and studio productions sometimes look aggressively ugly, here's a quirky vision at the intersection of sci-fi and romance. Upside Down can be beguiling if you're willing to invert disbelief.- Wall Street Journal
- Posted Mar 14, 2013
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
John Anderson
Less magical is the blind adherence to formula evident in most of Taken 2. As they might say in the advertising department, it's an adrenaline-fueled thrill ride. But it could have been much more.- Wall Street Journal
- Posted Oct 4, 2012
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Julie Salamon
With a refreshing absence of earnestness, the movie mainly spins out many variations on a theme: Easy Street begins and ends on Capitol Hill. [03 Dec 1992]- Wall Street Journal
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Joe Morgenstern
By all that's unholy, this third edition of the high-emission franchise should have been at least as awful as the second one was. (The first one was good fun.) Yet it's surprisingly entertaining in its deafening fashion, despite the absence of Vin Diesel and Paul Walker, the co-stars of parts one and two.- Wall Street Journal
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Joe Morgenstern
Its tone is unquenchably pretentious, and its scale is overblown.- Wall Street Journal
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Joe Morgenstern
A saga of static set pieces and strenuously clever notions, this is a fiasco of a film if ever there was one.- Wall Street Journal
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Joe Morgenstern
The situation in The Situation is grimly photogenic, yet persistently opaque.- Wall Street Journal
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Joe Morgenstern
Still, human doesn’t leap to mind, even though Ms. Lively works hard to inject blood in the veins of her feminist avenger. The Rhythm Section isn’t a human movie. It’s as cold as the waters of that loch, and nowhere near as lucid.- Wall Street Journal
- Posted Jan 30, 2020
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Nancy DeWolf Smith
The medium really is the message here, and it steals what there is of the show.- Wall Street Journal
-
Reviewed by