Chicago Reader's Scores
- Movies
For 6,312 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
42% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
56% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 5 points lower than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 60
| Highest review score: | I Stand Alone | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Old Dogs |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 2,983 out of 6312
-
Mixed: 2,456 out of 6312
-
Negative: 873 out of 6312
6312
movie
reviews
-
-
Reviewed by
Andrea Gronvall
Playing a competitive schemer not unlike her "Desperate Housewives" character, Parker doesn't generate much heat, while Rudd is squandered in a bland role.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Bill Stamets
Maxwell continues his textbook emphasis on military maneuvers, but despite literally thousands of Civil War reenactors recruited for the film, the wide-screen canvas fails to map the tactics or evoke the terror of battle.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Rosenbaum
A stiff. I don't know the comic book series, but it could hardly be as lifeless as this leaden adaptation, in which the weapons have more personality than the characters and the nonstop action often feels like no action at all.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
J.R. Jones
Director Adam Shankman (Bringing Down the House) can't block a sight gag to save his life.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Lisa Alspector
The result is an exploitation movie that seems like it's about something -- though what exactly I couldn't say.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
J.R. Jones
It's a great premise for comedy, but this thing is too dumb to do it justice.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
J.R. Jones
The serious Catholic themes that made the original film genuinely disturbing have been flattened out into a cartoonish backstory.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
J.R. Jones
More or less restages Tobe Hooper's 1974 original, including its much-loved family dinner scene.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Fred Camper
Directors Gerard Ungerman and Audrey Brohy don't provide much analysis, instead telling the familiar stories of the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
J.R. Jones
Beneath all the forced hilarity lies an awful fear of aging--and Sandler is only 43! This is gonna be rough.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Cliff Doerksen
Those who deem the gentle comedies of Christopher Guest (Waiting for Guffman, Best in Show) cruel to showbiz dreamers should be subjected to this ugliness.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Lisa Alspector
After loosening us up with some irresistible shtick that rigorously fulfills genre expectations, the movie subtly, systematically begins to break down familiar tropes in the depiction of attractiveness, attraction, and heterosexual courtship.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
J.R. Jones
Malkovich is severely miscast as a heartless and conniving thug admired by the hero (apparently Charles Grodin was busy), and Hopper, in a paper-thin role, barely registers.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
J.R. Jones
It's a pleasure to see Jill Clayburgh on the big screen in a story about middle-aged love and sexuality, but she can't rescue this alternately trite and implausible comedy.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
The crosscutting between the two plot lines is so feeble and intrusive that it destroys whatever faint narrative momentum the film possesses.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Lisa Alspector
This programmatic male-bonding comedy doesn't even borrow well.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Lisa Alspector
Writer Philip Stark ("That '70s Show") and director Danny Leiner ("Freaks and Geeks") apply mature comic instincts to an adolescent genre.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Rosenbaum
Moving in fits and starts, mawkish in its sincerity, and at times disjointed in its lumpy structure.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
J.R. Jones
The best thing I can say about this sleep-inducing kiddie comedy is that the need to bring in a PG rating must have precluded the endless series of giant-turd gags promised by the title.- Chicago Reader
- Posted Jul 16, 2011
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
J.R. Jones
Spike Lee's fans have learned to take the bad with the good, but this is pretty damn bad.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
J.R. Jones
A real air ball, this lethargic drama by Preston A. Whitmore II is so poorly scripted that most of the major plot developments occur offscreen.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Ted Shen
One of the film's most poignant moments comes when he and his father discuss his compulsive attraction to young boys.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Rosenbaum
Offers so much frenetic fast cutting to so little purpose that it becomes an ordeal.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Chicago Reader
- Read full review