The Shape of Water

9

WaelJan 18, 2018

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. "The Shape of Water" is what happens when you apply an excellent artistic take to a compelling peculiar premise (like, let's say... a mute woman falling for a weird amphibian creature). It tells the story of what happens when two creatures find common comfort in their undermined and misunderstood nature. The direction is excellent, the score fits the atmosphere of the film so well, and the characters are very poignant, evoking so many feelings and thoughts (even though the main two don't even say a single word the whole movie). The water is used for a lot of symbolism, like love (when they swim together in her flooded bathroom), erotica (the masturbation scenes and how well they fit with the boiling eggs), and salvation (when he brings her back from the dead and turns the scars on her neck to gills). In conclusion, this film was a true artful visual treat. Would totally recommend.… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

9

NBFCJan 17, 2018

“Water is like love, it has no shape. It takes the shape of whatever it inhabits. It’s the most powerful element in the universe. It’s gentle, flexible, but breaks through every barrier.”-Guillermo del Toro

Despite del Toro’s love for“Water is like love, it has no shape. It takes the shape of whatever it inhabits. It’s the most powerful element in the universe. It’s gentle, flexible, but breaks through every barrier.”-Guillermo del Toro

Despite del Toro’s love for comics, gothic visuals, giant mechs, and practical monster effects; the famous Spanish director has always been a bit of a romantic at heart as demonstrated by the above quote.

From his more artsy Spanish films (Devil’s Backbone, Pan’s Labyrinth) to the more mainstream efforts (Hellboy and Pacific Rim), there is a touching reoccurring theme concerning the idea of societal outsiders and marginalized individuals finding solace within each other’s company.

With his fascination with fairy tales, it seemed only a matter of time before del Toro took a stab at creating a straight-out romance tale, which comes in the form of his latest feature that gives a great twist to the “Beauty and the Beast” concept.

What makes TSOW probably one of del Toro’s best films since The Devil’s Backbone is that taken on a pure conceptual level, the inter-species romance angle could have easily been awkward and almost kitschy if done by lesser hands. But del Toro’s mathematical but delicate storytelling, impressive set designs, and the incredibly layered performances from the silent Sally Hawkins and Doug Jones, despite wearing a thick rubber monster costume, turns TSOW into one of the most touching and honest romance tales in quite a while.

The performances in general are incredible across the board, arguably the best when it comes to del Toro’s English-language movie canon. Hawkins is obviously magnetic in the lead but Michael Shannon as the openly racist research team leader Richard Strickland easily joins the canon of Jacinto (The Devil’s Backbone) and Captain Vidal (Pan’s Labyrinth) in del Toro’s brand of genuinely terrifying but tragic human villains.

But the person that I feel really stole the show was Richard Jenkins, playing Elisa’s down-on-his-luck friend/neighbor and closeted commercial artist Giles. Giles by far feels like the most down-to-earth character in this fantastical tale and you really do feel sorry for his plight in life. For most of the movie Giles and Elisa’s coworker Zelda (Octavia Spencer) have to verbalize the mute Elisa’s sign language; giving way to some unique interactions. Giles also provides some great subtle moments of comic relief.

Praise should also be level at the spell-binding score by Alexandre Desplat (The Grand Budapest Hotel, The Imitation Game, Argo), giving a film with admittedly strange subject manner a timeless classy atmosphere that further contributes to the fairy tale quality. The accordion and whistle-heavy music that plays over the film’s mesmerizing opening underwater dream sequence was the first sign that I was watching something truly special.

The movie on the whole has a magical Old Hollywood feel to the whole thing, which is something different compared to del Toro’s previous efforts. It’s not the type of Old Hollywood tribute that feels pandering either (Ex. La La Land), it all feels born out of genuine affection and is completely at the service of painting the film’s intoxicating atmosphere.

TSOW on the whole is a pretty unconventional movie that is hard to pigeonhole into a single genre.

It’s part “Beauty Meets Beast” romance, part creature-feature, part period piece, part fairy tale, part science fiction and part spy thriller. There is also the fact that this is an R-rated del Toro flick and while it’s not nearly as violent as Pan’s Labyrinth, there are a few scenes that will make you wince or shiver in uncomfortableness.

Even with the trailers it’s obvious the distributor’s Fox Searchlight Pictures could not crack the egg on how to market the movie. Hopefully it will continue to get more attention due to it’s appearance on many critic’s “best of” lists and with award season underway; but regardless del Toro’s latest masterwork is one of the 2017’s best.… Expand

4 of 11 users found this helpful47

All this user's reviews

10

Basma7Jan 16, 2018

such a wonderfully written and crafted movie.. just BEAUTIFUL. Love is Greater than Fear♥

3 of 9 users found this helpful36

All this user's reviews

9

trustyslothJan 15, 2018

The Shape of Water is Guillermo del Toro's best film to date. I don't recall ever watching a more humane movie in my life. You can see how the heart of everyone involved in the film is shed all over it. In this world, now, what humanity needsThe Shape of Water is Guillermo del Toro's best film to date. I don't recall ever watching a more humane movie in my life. You can see how the heart of everyone involved in the film is shed all over it. In this world, now, what humanity needs is to feel empathy for the other. And what a beautiful way to make this point over a mute who falls for a fish. Thankyou Guillermo, for speaking for those whose words aren't heard and because through your soul, I can see that it is possible to restore faith in humanity.… Expand

3 of 10 users found this helpful37

All this user's reviews

6

chesaroJan 15, 2018

This is at best a good movie, because it lack an original story, after around half an hour of watching it, you already know what is going to happen almost to the point that you don't need to get an explanaiton to some of the "misteries" ofThis is at best a good movie, because it lack an original story, after around half an hour of watching it, you already know what is going to happen almost to the point that you don't need to get an explanaiton to some of the "misteries" of the movie, i don't think it is a bad movie, but the praise it has gathered made me question what is considered a relevant movie in this days.… Expand

5 of 9 users found this helpful54

All this user's reviews

5

DevlindJan 14, 2018

I really tried to like this movie, but in the end it was in vain. Of course, I'm no expert, but I trust in my good taste in story telling. As some people commented, finding things just for the sake to be original isn't really necessary toI really tried to like this movie, but in the end it was in vain. Of course, I'm no expert, but I trust in my good taste in story telling. As some people commented, finding things just for the sake to be original isn't really necessary to effectively tell a good story. This romantic version of "Free Willy" is just an example. Just to start, both the protagonist and the sidekick are an utter pain. They barely had any dimension, how are we as spectators supposed to feel invested in their goals like that? How can we root for them? The pacing is awkward and unnecessarily long. A lot of things are just there for plot convenience. Subplots are thrown into the mix only to be forgotten immediately without any consequence. Even with Alexandre Desplat, the music is forgetable. The ending is abrupt and we are left with a lot of stuff still hanging.

Of course, there's good stuff in the movie too. The acting was good (although a little unrealistic at times), Octavia's and Michael characters were enjoyable and the main plot (when we got that on screen) was on point and that's why this movie is just average to me. It does really good in one side, but what it does wrong, it does it really wrong (sometimes cringe worthy).

If you have an open mind and you just want to watch something without thinking about it too much and just drift with it, go ahead and give it a go. With any luck, you'll enjoy it or even like it. I tried and it was definitely an experience.

Not watching it again though.… Expand

9 of 11 users found this helpful92

All this user's reviews

7

RtheomJan 14, 2018

This is basically "Beauty and the Beast" with del Toro visuals. Overall a very enjoyable movie although at bit too long. There are a number of scenes that are absolutely unnecessary, but absolutely del Toro. If you're the kind of person thatThis is basically "Beauty and the Beast" with del Toro visuals. Overall a very enjoyable movie although at bit too long. There are a number of scenes that are absolutely unnecessary, but absolutely del Toro. If you're the kind of person that likes his more artistic movies and watches them specifically for the visuals, you'll love this. If you find his movies enjoyable, but not magical, you'll still enjoy this, but wish it was shorter, like me. I'd place Pan's Labyrinth higher than this, but it's a close second to that and feels nearly the same. A solid 8 as far as acting, visuals and direction goes, but -1 point down to a 7 for the length.… Expand

4 of 10 users found this helpful46

All this user's reviews

9

mrharrybeckJan 13, 2018

This great tale of unexpected and true love between these two utterly different & unique entities makes you feel lucky for just witnessing it.

3 of 9 users found this helpful36

All this user's reviews

10

fiabegJan 9, 2018

There are many people who suffers from sexism, racism, homophobia or a disability. On the other hand there are people who behave as white male supremacists. Del Toro shows us some of these two different groups of people, how they live theirThere are many people who suffers from sexism, racism, homophobia or a disability. On the other hand there are people who behave as white male supremacists. Del Toro shows us some of these two different groups of people, how they live their different situations and how they deal with them.

But Del Toro goes beyond. He ads a third category, a non human creature. And show us the different way the two groups relate with this creature. The result is the confrontation of values like compassion, solidarity and love vs oppression, brutality and sense of superiority.

This is a wonderful movie. Sally Hawkins acting is extraordinary. Don’t miss it, you will enjoy it very much.… Expand

11 of 23 users found this helpful1112

All this user's reviews

0

thotJan 12, 2018

My dearest and most loveliest of **** I watched this movie under the guise that I, personally, would witness actual human-on-fish person sex. I am disappointed to report that not such thing happened. Sure, they had sex. Sure, the leadingMy dearest and most loveliest of **** I watched this movie under the guise that I, personally, would witness actual human-on-fish person sex. I am disappointed to report that not such thing happened. Sure, they had sex. Sure, the leading protagonist was naked. But did we ever see the Fishs Dick? Nope! We saw that horrible government dude raw his wife, but we didnt get to see Elisa get dicked down by a fish? Despicable! The only thing, in my ope-pinion, that was worse than the lies, was the poor cats death. I expected more from a supposed 'R' movie. Del Toro Resign ****… Expand

8 of 19 users found this helpful811

All this user's reviews

0

FilmLover83Jan 12, 2018

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I adore fantasy, monster movies, unusual and different stories. I HATED this movie. I created this account to review this movie. In 'Splash' Tom Hanks - your everyman guy gets the stunning mermaid. It's cute, fun and doesn't take itself too seriously. In this film, the ordinary girl gets a slimy cat-eating creature from the Black Lagoon (or rather, he gets her) and it takes itself very seriously in some artsy intensely annoying self-indulgent way which absolutely misses the mark. Guillermo del Toro pounds us over the head with his water theme (we get it already) and creates a female lead without understanding anything about women. She's childlike and annoying as hell, skipping down the corridor like a giddy child, implausibly falling for a monster not long after mopping up blood after he bites off and spits out human fingers (their 'falling in love' montage *could* possibly have been made believable, but absolutely was not), masturbating in the bath every morning (sorry guys - sure women masturbate, but not in the bath to an egg timer - del Toro put this in to heavy-handedly enforce his water theme and that's absolutely how it came across. She can do NOTHING without the help of every male character around her and is quite pathetic when she *could* have had an arc (the shy cleaner falls in love and rises in confidence, orchestrating and pulling off a rescue mission. But oh no, childlike and helpless she achieves nothing and the men around her have to save her mission at every turn). The film plods on forever with a second and third act that left me squirming in my seat and desperate to leave and finally ends anti-climatically and predictably. It didn't surprise me when Guillermo del Toro came out afterwards (this was an industry screening) and talked for 2 hours about his masterpiece and how profound it was, and how he dreamt it up as a child, because every boy without a girlfriend wants to imagine that even if he as an ugly amphibious monster, he could still score sex with a willing female with a size zero figure. Whatever!! It felt like sexist tripe from a self-indulgent man with no clue about women.
One of the worst films I have ever seen, made so much worse by how much it takes itself seriously. Classic Emperor's New Clothes situation here.… Expand

24 of 40 users found this helpful2416

All this user's reviews

3

AxeTJan 12, 2018

All of the season's fare is sickeningly over-rated by the critics herd to a level that's become ridiculous, and somehow this is even worse than expected and maybe less deserving than the rest in that absurd over-praise. There's no setup,All of the season's fare is sickeningly over-rated by the critics herd to a level that's become ridiculous, and somehow this is even worse than expected and maybe less deserving than the rest in that absurd over-praise. There's no setup, tone is wrong, music is wrong (that it's won some awards is just further proof) and most annoyingly the understood to be silly story is simply a strange foreign nerd's contrived excuse for childishly overt social sentiments instead of an actual thoughtful movie, and let me just say: I myself am a romantic and longtime monster movie fan!… Expand

12 of 22 users found this helpful1210

All this user's reviews

9

Aloxb3Jan 12, 2018

Um filme muito bonito e muito bem produzido com ótimos itens de época. Bons atores e boas atuações (Que nem sempre estão juntas *Tom Cruise*) o enredo é interessante e envolvente apesar da nudez que, neste caso, eu achei desnecessário porémUm filme muito bonito e muito bem produzido com ótimos itens de época. Bons atores e boas atuações (Que nem sempre estão juntas *Tom Cruise*) o enredo é interessante e envolvente apesar da nudez que, neste caso, eu achei desnecessário porém não tira a qualidade que este filme tem. É o meu romance favorito depois de "Her" :*… Expand

3 of 9 users found this helpful36

All this user's reviews

8

JLuis_001Jan 11, 2018

Guillermo del Toro takes the reins of the story of Beauty and The Beast and exposes it in film with every part of his style.

In general terms, I certainly think that the film could have been better in terms of story because I think it wasn'tGuillermo del Toro takes the reins of the story of Beauty and The Beast and exposes it in film with every part of his style.

In general terms, I certainly think that the film could have been better in terms of story because I think it wasn't really strong enough. The development of the characters is kinda poor because soon you realize that the only character that matters is Sally Hawkins character: Elisa Esposito but I've gotta say, she does a magnificent job as a mute janitor, who without words manages to be enormously expressive.

When I say the story wasn't strong enough I say it because the way in which it unfolds is very fortuitous, there is no background for the characters and the relationship that Elisa and the creature develop is too fast for my taste, especially considering the deep love that Elisa develops for him.

Michael Shannon is a one-dimensional villain and I'm surprised that Del Toro wasted him in that way.

Putting that aside, The Shape of Water is a very well done film, with an impeccable production that bears all the signature of Del Toro. The music is exceptional, one of the best scores of Alexandre Desplat and in general the film is very enjoyable, it is two hours of good entertainment, quality entertainment and yes it's honestly the best film of del Toro since Pan's Labyrinth. No doubt the magic is still there, but I think a little shake in terms of narrative would not hurt him, I feel that Guillermo can evolve and create much more complex stories and I think it's necessary for him to do so because he may fall into a creative hole and the worst thing that could happen to him is to be repetitive.… Expand

3 of 9 users found this helpful36

All this user's reviews

8

Meth-dudeJan 9, 2018

With beautiful visuals, great acting performances, above average directing and an interesting story, The Shape of Water is one of the most visually interesting and original movies of 2017. While the movie dragged a little at parts and oneWith beautiful visuals, great acting performances, above average directing and an interesting story, The Shape of Water is one of the most visually interesting and original movies of 2017. While the movie dragged a little at parts and one scene in particular annoyed me, it's still a visually impressive and rather entertaining movie.… Expand

3 of 9 users found this helpful36

All this user's reviews

10

Willyam_CarrJan 8, 2018

This is possibly the most beautiful love story put to the screen, and it is about a woman falling for a fish-man.

5 of 12 users found this helpful57

All this user's reviews

10

Nick_MadJan 8, 2018

This is the most genius movie of the year. Del Toro is one of my lovely directors ever. And shape of water as by me looks like a spin-off of Hellboy. And it is awesome!!! I recommend it to everyone.

3 of 10 users found this helpful37

All this user's reviews

7

RroyJan 7, 2018

Good story that celebrates diversity (and could have done it more subtly) but which is not as strong (by far) as Pan’s Labyrinth.

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

9

GREEK-GODJan 6, 2018

Guillermo Del Toro's newest film "The Shape of Water" took my breath away. Easily this is Del Toro's finest film since "Pan's Labyrinth" and may even be his best in general. This is a film where Del Toro weaves magic throughout with a storyGuillermo Del Toro's newest film "The Shape of Water" took my breath away. Easily this is Del Toro's finest film since "Pan's Labyrinth" and may even be his best in general. This is a film where Del Toro weaves magic throughout with a story he created which is simple, yet layered with such interesting facets embedded in each character, set, and prop as he allows the audience to discover this intimate and fascinating world of "broken" people searching for a moment of meaning. Captivating from its opening scenes with haunting visual imagery, and a lyrical score by Alexandre Desplat, one is immediately enthralled by this fairy tale that is not your usual saccharine variety that Disney cranks out.

Del Toro knows how to tell a story with wit, style and heart. Assembling a cast headed by the incandescent Sally Hawkins in the role of Eliza who is mute throughout the film, but exudes such humanity and strength along with the villainous Michael Shannon who provides a great balance. Every single actor sparkles because every character has been developed with great care. Richard Jenkins and Octavia Spencer shine in their roles bringing a touch of quirkiness and humor to this sometimes dark story.

The film is achingly nostalgic with glorious production design by Paul D. Austerberry evoking the Baltimore of 1962 full of fascinating textures of faded glory, especially in the magnificent design of Eliza's apartment and hallways. Exquisite camera work by Dan Laustsen and beautifully designed costumes by Luis Sequiera contribute greatly to complete Guillermo Del Toro's vision.

This film is really the ultimate version of "Beauty and The Beast" with a touch of "ET", capped off with a very emotional investment, that pays off for the audience in its poetic and lyrical final scene. Certainly one of the finest films of 2017.… Expand

3 of 10 users found this helpful37

All this user's reviews

4

RidgeamordeJan 5, 2018

I'm sorry but this movie is just not as good as people would make it out to be. There were some good parts but overall I'd say it's too stupid, unrealistic, and just overall bad. I could already tell what was going to happen at the end beforeI'm sorry but this movie is just not as good as people would make it out to be. There were some good parts but overall I'd say it's too stupid, unrealistic, and just overall bad. I could already tell what was going to happen at the end before the movie hit the halfway mark. The actors, while skilled, were held back the the horrendous script that was completely irrational. Maybe I just don't get it or something, but it seems like it's trying too hard. I think it deserves a four. I would definitely not see it again.… Expand

10 of 15 users found this helpful105

All this user's reviews

9

kiankJan 4, 2018

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This movie is a little weird, there is no denying that but it is also romantic and visually captivating. The main character, played by Sally Hawkins, is mute and she able to find love with this sea creature because of their shared mutism. While the premise may seem weird, the story is conveyed in a romantic and cute way that captivated me throughout. The main villain wasn't very complex but the actor did a good job making a new hated villain. Moreover, Hawkins' character's neighbor is a homosexual struggling artist who truly was "born in the wrong time." I loved seeing him and Sally's character interact, and their relationship overall was sweet. Octavia Spencer and Sally Hawkins also have great on screen chemistry and I love seeing Spencer, one of my favorite actresses, in a science fiction movie. The ending was quite intense but it left me satisfied. Overall, I would give it an 8.9.… Expand

3 of 9 users found this helpful36

All this user's reviews

8

marymaebennettJan 4, 2018

Last year for NYE, I watched Arrival and this NYE I watched The Shape of Water. Both movies are about trying to communicate with monsters. Weird coincidence. The first movie I watched in theatres this year was Hidden Figures, the last movie ILast year for NYE, I watched Arrival and this NYE I watched The Shape of Water. Both movies are about trying to communicate with monsters. Weird coincidence. The first movie I watched in theatres this year was Hidden Figures, the last movie I watched was, of course, The Shape of Water. Both movies are about trying to make further scientific discoveries than Russia. Weird coincidence. So, why did it take me this long to write a review? I don't know. I don't know how I feel about this movie. It was very unique in premise but it felt very paint by numbers in structure. It was like they read a book on the rules of screenwriting and decided they needed to incorporate every rule. The color wheel was a bit on the nose. The Hitchcock rule was definitely implemented. The allusions were there. I'm sure there were more but it's been a while since I've seen it. I did like the movie and the rules were effective but I just wonder for a movie all about not playing it safe, why did they play it so safe?… Expand

3 of 9 users found this helpful36

All this user's reviews

6

namelessJan 3, 2018

This is such an individual film that I could have rated it green just as easly. The problem is that it is a Hollywood film for the first hour and then transforms into an Art film for the second hour. Art Films are fine but we all know thatThis is such an individual film that I could have rated it green just as easly. The problem is that it is a Hollywood film for the first hour and then transforms into an Art film for the second hour. Art Films are fine but we all know that Art Films are as formulaic as Hollywood films. There are some incredible scenes but the film really is a bunch of incredible scenes, it isn't a sum of its parts. Yes, her acting supports the film, she will be nomiated because she carries the film. It is a passion film of Del Toro but lacks the cohesiveness of Pan's Labyrinth. I'm waiting for the next Pacific Rim.… Expand

3 of 10 users found this helpful37

All this user's reviews

3

yosemiteJan 2, 2018

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This film is the standard bearer for inaccurate movie reviews. The artsy crafty Harvard Square crowd rate it 80-85 or 90 approval rating. Its the type of film making they dissected in college. As for the real world, it sucks ! Let me make a profitable movie. I'll start with a plain looking mute who supports herself scrubbing floors. Although she frequently masterbates, she has a heart of gold. She feels badly for a Black Lagoon look a like who is being held captive by the U.S. military. She arranges for the creature to escape. I could go on but its rubbish. If you want to drop $8-12 dollars and pretend you are an intellectual, go for it . Another choice is take that $$$ , but yourself a sub sandwich and watch the Breaking Bad marathon on AMC… Expand

12 of 21 users found this helpful129

All this user's reviews

9

ledaumasDec 31, 2017

Very imaginative with great characters: the good, the bad, and the ugly. I'm thinking the movie is about being different, that people are prejudice, and how the characters in this movie handle it. It's very sad to think that when you haveVery imaginative with great characters: the good, the bad, and the ugly. I'm thinking the movie is about being different, that people are prejudice, and how the characters in this movie handle it. It's very sad to think that when you have such a vast difference of opinion, some people resort to violence rather than work out a solution. Sally Hawkins has the type of face that tells you what she's feeling. Olympia Spencer is always a wonderful addition, and we need her for this sad story. I think the story ends well if Sally's character is fine with what happens. I always like Michael Shannon and Richard Jenkins. They can play any role well. It was a nice story line to show a Soviet spy with a heart.… Expand

3 of 10 users found this helpful37

All this user's reviews

2

candycamalDec 30, 2017

Visuals are evocative & nicely moody - settled in thinking I'd love this movie, but ugh... was primarily shameless emotional manipulation. I liked Sally Hawkins, no complaint there, but nothing was subtle or interesting - flat - everyVisuals are evocative & nicely moody - settled in thinking I'd love this movie, but ugh... was primarily shameless emotional manipulation. I liked Sally Hawkins, no complaint there, but nothing was subtle or interesting - flat - every character: 'Good' / 'Bad'. As Rex Reed noted - villains were straight from central casting. Octavia Spencer: convenient 'prop'; someone had to translate mute woman's sign language. Magical realism: kinda, but not quite. Gratuitous female masterbation scenes. Sledge hammer subtlety illustrating sad, sympathetic, sweet, old, insecure gay man encountering a young, ugly, ignorant homophobe. And romance where a big, very manly monster from the deep and sweet, silent, delicate & damaged little woman find each other - ah geez - it was all just too painfully predictable. Then... to end with a classic chase scene & shoot out. Nope. Didn't much care for this movie.… Expand

8 of 15 users found this helpful87

All this user's reviews

9

MrNeon16Dec 28, 2017

A couple of weeks ago I had the opportunity to see Guillermo Del Toro 's new film The Shape Of Water.
I am a huge fan.
Pan's Labyrinth, Hellboy and... Pacific Rim. I love his unique eye. That being said, I had no idea what The Shape Of WaterA couple of weeks ago I had the opportunity to see Guillermo Del Toro 's new film The Shape Of Water.
I am a huge fan.
Pan's Labyrinth, Hellboy and... Pacific Rim.
I love his unique eye. That being said, I had no idea what The Shape Of Water was about. So, I went into the theatre blind with no expectations.
What an experience.
This is a beautiful film. In so many ways.
A throwback monster flick at first glance: Creature From The Black Lagoon finally gets the girl.
The film is so much more.
Sally Hawkins is amazing and beautiful as Elisa. The mute janitor who works in a secret government facility that is housing the Mer-Man. A strange man like creature discovered in the Amazon rivers.
The Mer-Man is played eloquently, without a word of dialogue by Doug Jones. There is little to no CGI in regards to how The Creature is presented. I was amazed and believed he was a real presence throughout.
This is an fantasy/sci-fi interspecies love story film with drama, humor, danger, timely action and just enough magic.
I laughed and I was moved. Not to mention I was in awe by the technical work put on the screen.
The cinematography by Paul Luatesen and the Production Design by Paul D. Austerbery were AMAZING. I felt as if I was in 60's Baltimore with no doubts.
The Shape Of Water will be out soon in general release. I will definitely recommend it wholeheartedly. One of the most pleasurable movie experiences I have had in the movie theatres this year.… Expand

3 of 11 users found this helpful38

All this user's reviews

6

RatedRexDec 28, 2017

Sometimes they just try too hard to be original. This is one of those times. The story makes no sense. Even fairy-tales must have plausibility. I wanted to like "The Shape of Water". But in the end, it was just another example of HollywoodSometimes they just try too hard to be original. This is one of those times. The story makes no sense. Even fairy-tales must have plausibility. I wanted to like "The Shape of Water". But in the end, it was just another example of Hollywood types letting their imagination get out of hand.… Expand

11 of 18 users found this helpful117

All this user's reviews

0

tmosley001Dec 27, 2017

This movie is mind control/ on a level humans are unable to Grasp I guess/ since it is all about insulting anyone and everyone without anyone objecting/ It is about programming you to except things you would never except, so you know it isThis movie is mind control/ on a level humans are unable to Grasp I guess/ since it is all about insulting anyone and everyone without anyone objecting/ It is about programming you to except things you would never except, so you know it is about Mind Control/ Means your Carnal mind has lost its ability to discern what is going on.
You are being told what to think/ This is a very sick movie.… Expand

10 of 33 users found this helpful1023

All this user's reviews

9

Compi24Dec 26, 2017

"The Shape Of Water" is a film that's about as difficult of an undertaking for a director as possible. It's a Cold War era fantasy/sci-fi thriller with fairy tale elements, a very frank sense of sexuality, and a whole heap-load of gore. Oh,"The Shape Of Water" is a film that's about as difficult of an undertaking for a director as possible. It's a Cold War era fantasy/sci-fi thriller with fairy tale elements, a very frank sense of sexuality, and a whole heap-load of gore. Oh, also it's a movie that has to successfully sell a woman/fish-man romance in just about 2 hours. Good luck, am I right? Well, Del Toro has proven time and time again that luck doesn't necessarily factor into auteuristic filmmaking. The man's ability to craft and sell a world in no time flat is simply astounding. And if there was ever a movie that could perfectly embody the phrase "poetry in motion," Guillermo Del Toro just made it. From the first shot of the film, you're sucked in to the lyrical nature of the cinematography, and held tightly in your seat by the simply masterful performance work from - quite literally - every actor onscreen. Sally Hawkins, Doug Jones, Michael Shannon, Richard Jenkins, Octavia Spencer, Michael Stuhlbarg, etc. They all deliver some their best work. Unquestionably one of the most meaningful, original, powerful, and well-made films of the year.… Expand

4 of 11 users found this helpful47

All this user's reviews

5

AppetipsDec 26, 2017

Lovely at times, and breathtakingly beautiful throughout, but very uneven in pacing and direction. I wanted it to be so much scarier in the scary parts, so much more romantic in the tender moments. Sally Hawkins is very, very good, andLovely at times, and breathtakingly beautiful throughout, but very uneven in pacing and direction. I wanted it to be so much scarier in the scary parts, so much more romantic in the tender moments. Sally Hawkins is very, very good, and Michael Shannon is fabulously menacing. I wanted more from the score too, as Alexandre Desplat usually creates more memorable music than this. Just one opinion, and I am definitely a del Toro fan, but I enjoyed Devils Backbone and Pans Labyrinth much more than this film.… Expand

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

1

nj06Dec 23, 2017

DO NOT BE FOOLED. This is a dreadful movie, that you will regret wasting your time on (as I am regretting it right now). I loved "Pan's Labyrinth" and I can not believe that the same person directed this delusional self-congratulatoryDO NOT BE FOOLED. This is a dreadful movie, that you will regret wasting your time on (as I am regretting it right now). I loved "Pan's Labyrinth" and I can not believe that the same person directed this delusional self-congratulatory unwatchable mess. In addition to being somehow both irritatingly stupid and seriously boring at same time, other problems with this movie are..., never mind, stupid and boring is enough to describe it, so I will leave it at that.… Expand

25 of 44 users found this helpful2519

All this user's reviews

9

UltimatmovieguyDec 23, 2017

Guillermo Del Toro is back in this under water romance drama. After years of not writing any origional material and staying strictly to directing, he has immerged from the depths of the ocean and arose with a near masterpiece. The plot beingGuillermo Del Toro is back in this under water romance drama. After years of not writing any origional material and staying strictly to directing, he has immerged from the depths of the ocean and arose with a near masterpiece. The plot being set to a 1960's era with its dark and bleak surroundings is filled with a glimmer of hope everytime Sally Hawkins, Elisa, appears on screen. With the main character being a mute it adds to the whole film with its unique characters and twisty plot. Shot with reportily less than $20 million dollars as well. This movie is beautiful. Octavia Spencer, gives a great minor performance as a more moral guide for Hawkins and a comic relief in some of its most tense scenes. Michael Shannon is amazing as the films antagonist and it's moral split on what he wants. And Richard Jenkins is amazing as Hawkins friend who supports her in her decisions in unique ways. And not to forget about the amazing performance by Doug Jones as the amphibian man is amazing. With such a low budget it doesn't show with its beautifully design sets and props along side with minor special effects and CGI used to accent this movies beauty. Between being in the underground of the lab to the bus rides to looking out Elisa's window to watch the rain and dark city light up. It's underwater scenes are equally as beautiful as we watch the slow romance build. The only complaint I have on the movie is I wish we got a little more in-depth explanation of a few character's backgrounds and some of their understandings as why they do what they did in the film. But besides that it's a near flawless movie that's entertaining as hell. Leaving you happy and wanting more from Del Toro.… Expand

4 of 11 users found this helpful47

All this user's reviews

10

katezoeDec 22, 2017

Imaginary world that breaks your heart. A magical and romantic fairy tale! Guillermo del Toro's best film. Incredible acting by the entire cast and Sally Hawkins gives an incredible performance. Special effects are marvelous. The perfectImaginary world that breaks your heart. A magical and romantic fairy tale! Guillermo del Toro's best film. Incredible acting by the entire cast and Sally Hawkins gives an incredible performance. Special effects are marvelous. The perfect movie for the Holiday's.… Expand

4 of 13 users found this helpful49

All this user's reviews

8

TrevorsViewDec 22, 2017

Here it is! My absolute favorite movie of 2017! While Star Wars: The Last Jedi comes in close at second, I still had issues about it that grew over time. Yet for The Shape of Water, it’s the opposite: the more I think about it, the more IHere it is! My absolute favorite movie of 2017! While Star Wars: The Last Jedi comes in close at second, I still had issues about it that grew over time. Yet for The Shape of Water, it’s the opposite: the more I think about it, the more I love it!

Found in the river as a baby—abandoned by her parents, Elisa, a mute, keeps a specific daily routine in her home over Baltimore’s grand Orpheum theater. In the morning, she masturbates in the bath and hard-boils eggs; then she commutes to work, her cap used to cushion her cheek on the bus window, often mesmerized by water droplets dancing across the glass; then over the next eight hours she puts on her janitor apron to swab up a government-funded facility. So sure enough, Elisa finds a ripple to disrupt her calm life once she meets the Amazonian man-shaped fish, essentially The Creature from the Black Lagoon in design, imprisoned in the facility. The two instantly discover the great sense they have in common, since neither one of them can speak.

Even if they lack the decisive intelligence of humans, God’s animals somehow can see your true self better than people, as the anthropomorphic denizen from below does upon meeting Elisa. She shares one of her hardboiled eggs, teaching him to say “egg” in American Sign Language, like the “Project Nim” study at Columbia University. Over time, their nonverbal connection grows into something unimaginably intimate for Elisa’s inner Mary Magdalene.

Director Guillermo del Toro (Pan’s Labyrinth) sustains aquatic turquoise hues to delight his gothic, fantasized 1960s recreation, practically a giant rustic French painting. From the key lime tinted diner to a shiny new teal Cadillac, waves of despair swirl about inside what almost resembles the nearest abandoned cathedral after a flood destroyed its inner form; an immersive feel of swimming through the sets miraculously keeps itself going.

Del Toro commands your thirst without crossing into arthouse cinema mode, he just tells a straightforward story under the necessary creative choices in sound design. The beautiful sounds include the musical score’s orchestrated beauty creeping from beneath, thanks to eight-time Oscar nominee Alexandre Desplat (Argo, The Grand Budapest Hotel). The harsher sounds include the thump-squeak-thump of sex transitioned into the pulse of the facility’s prison chamber run to the same beat, as if lust is the true fuel for the drowned organization.

Everyone in the plotline whirlpool, such as some communists after the new discovery, lives a personal objectional truth about who to worship, with bits of your own identity projected upon every individual on the seafoam tinted screen. Richard Jenkins (The Visitor) portrays Elisa’s besieged artist neighbor like a spirit progressively decaying by the scenery no matter how high he tries to keep it up. Octavia Spencer (The Help, Hidden Figures) likewise highlights her subtle racial empowerment to convey a fear of racist attacks on her work ethic in an all-White facility. Although no one in the talented cast brought out the film’s aura as well as Sally Hawkins (Blue Jasmine) in the main role, commanding a quiet nature, secretly strong inside despite her weak façade.

While a few smaller actors did fail to leave a durable impression, it barely affected much beyond missed chances. Speaking of missed chances, the government’s involvement in the fishy situation could’ve been tightened up a bit to create deeper political arguments, rather than the shallow Democratic stand the script ends up taking.

Now look back at the big picture, particularly the way it channels old social issues into the US today. A rather impactful detail includes a point when Blacks in the city are refused a seat at public eateries, alongside presumed homosexuals. It reminds about the dark side of the plastered 1950’s American dream all men at the time craved to perfect. The villain in particular follows the universal dream by joyfully shocking the man-shaped thing he claimed as his trophy. According to science, no animals can ever smile or cry, so such a prize ought to be head monkey of the circus put on by US Government. This beast’s resemblance to Jesus Christ, alongside his child’s curiosity, represents Blacks, homosexuals—anyone outside the societal bubble. The real monster isn’t the hideous blue freak, but the bleach-washed success-crazed humans destined for the fate of Jonah.

Therefore, please go hear Fox Searchlight’s tale of the unbelievable romance, one which uses the supposed lies to warn you about the truth.… Expand

5 of 13 users found this helpful58

All this user's reviews

8

TVJerryDec 22, 2017

Sally Hawkins brings her natural inner beauty and sensitive charms to this role as a mute cleaning lady. She and Octavia Spencer (who adds her brand of spunk) work at a high security government facility. When she discovers an amphibiousSally Hawkins brings her natural inner beauty and sensitive charms to this role as a mute cleaning lady. She and Octavia Spencer (who adds her brand of spunk) work at a high security government facility. When she discovers an amphibious man-like creature, her curiosity and longing for love disrupt the lab and set the narrative in motion. Obviously, this is science fiction, but more importantly, it's a romantic fantasy. Even though it's based in '60s Baltimore, the slightly surreal style and bigger-than-life imagery lend it a wondrously eccentric edge. This makes sense, considering it comes from the highly creative mind of writer/director Guillermo del Toro. His masterful style and the elevated emotions make the film a slightly bizarre, sometimes melodramatic, yet still sweetly human encounter.… Expand

5 of 12 users found this helpful57

All this user's reviews

8

KeithDowDec 22, 2017

The Shape of Water stands out for the way Guillermo del Toro is able to give this fantasy-laden film such a distinct time and place, in this case a military research facility set in the 1960’s, which highlights del Toro’s masterfulThe Shape of Water stands out for the way Guillermo del Toro is able to give this fantasy-laden film such a distinct time and place, in this case a military research facility set in the 1960’s, which highlights del Toro’s masterful screenwriting ability. The writing is further gilded by its intellectual depth, with characters remarking about the origin of certain words and names, or drawing on biblical references to better frame the predicaments they’re in. And if del Toro only wrote the screenplay, he’d still be receiving acclaim, yet this entire production is his. All told, he’s credited as the writer, director, and producer.

The film exhibits an alluring, Amelie-like color profile, with water motifs throughout, featuring a career-making performance by Sally Hawkins. The selective use of nudity and sexuality adds a real sense of depth and fullness to her role, making the character seem that much more lifelike, and Hawkins certainly makes the most of it.

Her performance is quite simply magnanimous. She’s outwardly tender and sweet, with an inner strength and resolve that manifests itself whenever the occasion calls. It’s a combination of perfect casting and the actress rising to the occasion that, in my estimation, places her as the odds on favorite to win the Golden Globe for Best Performance by an actress in a drama, for which she’s currently nominated, and the Academy Award in the same category, for which she most certainly will be nominated.… Expand

4 of 10 users found this helpful46

All this user's reviews

9

FlexedacornDec 21, 2017

Guillermo Del Toro is back in form. This was a very welcome surprise for me after being let down by his last film “Crimson Peak”. I would say this is his best film right after Pans Labyrinth. The tone, atmosphere and practical effects allGuillermo Del Toro is back in form. This was a very welcome surprise for me after being let down by his last film “Crimson Peak”. I would say this is his best film right after Pans Labyrinth. The tone, atmosphere and practical effects all played nicely into making this bizarre film believable. It was more of a contained story complimented by some of the best acting I have seen in a while. I have to give nods to almost all the main characters. Sally Hawkins, Michael Shannon, Richard Jenkins, Octavia Spencer and Michael Stuhlbarg all gave wonderful performances. There is one scene between Sally Harkins and Richard Jenkins that should give her an Oscar Nomination. If you like bizarre films or just want a nice original screen play, I highly recommend the shape of water. Just be forewarned there are scenes that are very unorthodox, so you have to keep an open mind throughout.… Expand

6 of 14 users found this helpful68

All this user's reviews

9

GreatMartinDec 19, 2017

There is so much to love—and hate—about “The Shape of Water” but there is one thing everyone has to agree upon and that is the illuminating performance by Sally Hawkins. I have seen her in some movies but never remembered her, or was thatThere is so much to love—and hate—about “The Shape of Water” but there is one thing everyone has to agree upon and that is the illuminating performance by Sally Hawkins. I have seen her in some movies but never remembered her, or was that impressed by her, until earlier this year when I saw “Maudie” and flipped over her performance which she outdoes in this movie.

A lot goes on in this movie, which starts off slowly, but never feels rushed or ‘off’ including the love story. People who are looking for fantasy will find it and believe the make-believe is real while those looking for a villain will not find anyone more ‘hissable’ than Michael Shannon nor some violent scenes while not lasting long will be remembered long after. There are Russian spies like Michael Stuhlbarg playing a scientist with secrets of his own, a gay friend/neighbor Richard Jenkins who has a refrigerator filled with slices of pies that he buys from the counter server, Morgan Kelly, who he has a crush on. There is the 5-star general who take no for an answer and there is Octavia Spencer who everyone should have as a friend.

There is frontal and rear nudity by both men and women along with, literally, finger crunching scenes, cattle prod hits and then there is the “Asset”, the sea creature which the story revolves around affecting everyone in the movie. He is played by Doug Jones and, considering that he and Sally Hawkins have a believable love story with neither being able to speak, is one of the best love stories in movies in a long time. You know he is a ‘creature from the Black Lagoon’ but you forget that and root for him and Elisa (Hawkins) to have a happy ending.

I am not a fan of director Guillermo del Toro’s previous movies but he does a beautiful job of directing here along with writing the screenplay, with Vanessa Taylor and producing, with J. Miles Dale, a first-rate production in every aspect of the movie.

For old car lovers there is the first teal colored Cadillac, for old movie fans there is Alice Faye, Carmen Miranda and a salute to Fred and Ginger and for the music lovers some big band and jazz music along with “You’ll Never Know How Much I Love”.

Along with touching upon many movie genres, the casting couldn’t have been better and I would be hard pressed as to whether Sally Hawkins should get an Oscar nomination for this or “Maudie” since according to the rules actresses aren’t allowed to be nominated for 2 different pictures.

“The Shape of Water” is not an easy film to get into and at times to watch but it is definitely a film to see.… Expand

6 of 15 users found this helpful69

All this user's reviews

9

NightReviewsDec 18, 2017

If I told you about The Shape of Water, what would I tell you? I wonder?

Well, for starters, I don’t think that anyone would have predicted that we would have gotten two adaptations of the classic “Beauty and the Beast” story arc in 2017.If I told you about The Shape of Water, what would I tell you? I wonder?

Well, for starters, I don’t think that anyone would have predicted that we would have gotten two adaptations of the classic “Beauty and the Beast” story arc in 2017. While one was a literal Disney re-imagining, following the animated classic almost frame-for-frame, Disney’s March hit Beauty and the Beast was a huge success at the box office and with critics alike. While our second interpretation, The Shape of Water, the film is more of a…lets say, unconventional take on the classic narrative archetype; complete with full frontal nudity, scenes of masterbation, feline decapitation and of course (as with any del Toro film) good ol’ bloody violence, our second interpretation is defiantly a more imaginative and adult directed adaptation.

Yet, the sex, blood, violence, gore and nudity aren’t the things we remember most from The Shape of Water. Instead, we focus on the lucid use of luminous night colours, the amazing characters and all of their flaws, feats and challenges, and most of all, the beauty of such a taboo love story, between two very misunderstood individuals from different worlds.

While del Toro may very well NOT be remembered as a director and writer who flourished making intoxicating love stories, The Shape of Water will surely be a film that challenges that notion greatly.

Set in 1962, del Toro’s newest is an interesting yet ironically reflective film that romanticizes the past with great style. While the past that del Toro is passionate about, his narratives always seem to use the past as a tool that presents an idealized and passionate and very forward way of thinking. In doing so, del Toro uses the past as a reference point of so many of society’s mistakes about women, visible minorities and of course, a repressed society without a voice, hence, why our story centres around a princess without a voice.

Our princess here, Elisa (Sally Hawkins), is an uninteresting mute who, in the first five minutes, establishes her daily routine of her home life, work life and social life in very quick and easy to understand order of routine. Elisa, who works for a highly classified government research facility in Baltimore, has seen many things. Among one of the newest secrets to be housed in the facility, is their most sensitive assets to-date; an aquatic creature that was captured in South America by the highly violent and blue-collard, religious American patriot Strickland (Michael Shannon). Along with her best Zelda (Octavio Spencer), Elisa and Zelda are tasked with cleaning the facility that houses the highly sensitive and elaborate creature from the South American lagoon, with out course keeping in mind that Elisa’s muteness adds to the sense of secrecy. With each passing day and intrigue to blame, Elisa becomes more and more transfixed with the two-legged, finned man-fish who is never given a name but played by the del Toro staple Doug Jones. Clearly, Elisa begins to fall in love with the creature that eats the hard boiled eggs. As each passing night brings the beast and beauty together, Elisa begins smuggling in record players, vinyls and experiences for the creature that begins to humanize him. Sharing her nightly work experiences with her best friend and neighbour Giles (Richard Jenkins), Elisa finds comfort in the unordinary romance with the “thing” that has captivates her heart, as well as ours.

It would be hard to argue the vision of the passionate and such artful director Guillermo del Toro, especially since his masterwork Pan’s Labyrinth. While Water may not be that films successor, it surely will be remembered along side it for many years to come. A man whose fascination with the gothic and horror elements of storytelling are visibly seen in almost all his works, del Toro has been known for focus on action and the very violent side of story-telling. With The Shape of Water, del Toro places violence and gore aside, alongside with his co-writer Vanessa Taylor, who decide to focus on their shared voice of telling the story, the very contemporary and relevant social commentary, as well as the love story between a woman and a creature who feels and is made to feel, that they do not belong.

The theme of oppression is soaked within each and every frame of The Shape of Water. By choosing on having the main couple in love both mute, the two main voices of the film are Zelda (a black working class woman) and Giles (an artistic, flamboyant artist), two very specific caricatures of people who may have suffered the most amount of oppression and suppression in the United States in the 1960’s. Yet, in a world where Russians and Americans are in a race to superiorly outwit one another, del Toro’s world in the film, doesn’t seem too far from the America we know and despise today.… Expand

7 of 16 users found this helpful79

All this user's reviews

10

GinaKDec 18, 2017

I have seen most of the films Del Toro has directed, especially his very early films like Cronos and The Devil’s Backbone. I consider him a great and very interesting director, and I think this film is a wonderful achievement, one that isI have seen most of the films Del Toro has directed, especially his very early films like Cronos and The Devil’s Backbone. I consider him a great and very interesting director, and I think this film is a wonderful achievement, one that is both lyrical and romantic. Somehow, even though the villain is completely evil and the heroine thoroughly good, the film works and is both riveting and very, very sad. To make a film like this believable, every performance has to be strong and all are, but especially Sally Hawkins, who is sympathetic as a mute without ever being pathetic, and Doug Jones, who does an incredible job making you believe that the Amphibian Man has feelings regardless of how weird he looks. Although hateful in the film, Michael Shannon does a great job as the villain and Octavia Spencer is wonderful too. Overall, a very strong cast in a beautifully directed film. One of the best films I have seen this year.… Expand

6 of 14 users found this helpful68

All this user's reviews

8

ffejeryDec 17, 2017

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. It was a smart fairy tale. It's a collage of things we've already seen but put together in a unique way. Sally Hawkins' conveys so much emotion without saying a word. The supporting cast is great too. The 60's sets are cool and the cinematography is beautiful. The water motif is consistent through out. That being said allow me to switch into a Jungian analysis of the story in the context of the 1960's sexual revolution:

I thought the sea creature symbolized feeling shame for sexual desire. Under water represents the subconscious. She masturbates under water in the bathtub and the creature comes from under water. Then she boils eggs while masturbating and uses the eggs in the lab to lure the creature up from under water at the lab. Later they have sex in the bath tub. I think the movie is set in the 1960's to coincide with the sexual revolution. Thanks to the pill, more women were able to have sex for pleasure. Society had to reconcile that with more established conservative beliefs. This is the symbolism of the creature being smuggled out of the lab and into society. That was an interesting digression. At any rate, it's worth checking out. It's not a gangster movie even though the main character does end up sleeping with the fishes.… Expand

6 of 11 users found this helpful65

All this user's reviews

6

netflicDec 18, 2017

This latest movie from director Guillermo Del Toro is creating a lot of buzz. It has been nominated for Golden Globe in 7 categories and expected to win it's main prize. No doubt that it will be in the Oscar's list as well.

The movie isThis latest movie from director Guillermo Del Toro is creating a lot of buzz. It has been nominated for Golden Globe in 7 categories and expected to win it's main prize. No doubt that it will be in the Oscar's list as well.

The movie is listed as a mixture of 5 different genres but I would describe it as a pseudo-realistic fairy tale for adults.

It is a love story between a mute woman who cleans a high-security government institution and a semi-human, semi-amphibian creature that US Army caught in an ocean for research.

This artsy film recreates an atmosphere of Cold-War-era America with enchanting visuals and music and it is pleasant to watch most of the time.
So I understand why so many people praise it. On the other hand, in my opinion, the hype is not justified. The movie is not targeted to children. Yet all characters are caricaturish: either all-out villains or all-out do-gooders.

There are many annoying details that scream of poor directing. And don't even get me started about cliches: you can hardly find one that is missing here.

There are three superb actors that have almost nothing to play due to a primitive script. But they still manage to impress.

So, after all, I am glad that I saw it. It *is* charming, but your mileage might vary.… Expand

4 of 10 users found this helpful46

All this user's reviews

9

misterpDec 17, 2017

The Shape Of Water is well done. It has especially good acting by Sally Hawkins. Although we have seen the frame work of this story before this movie has fresh dilogue, well developed lead characters and a uniqueness of it's own. PerhapsThe Shape Of Water is well done. It has especially good acting by Sally Hawkins. Although we have seen the frame work of this story before this movie has fresh dilogue, well developed lead characters and a uniqueness of it's own. Perhaps more could have been done to develop the monster character.… Expand

5 of 12 users found this helpful57

All this user's reviews

1

marco34laDec 16, 2017

This movie was awful. How much did the studios pay the critics on this one. It's an absolute ridiculous BORE. 3 people walked out and i soon followed.

22 of 57 users found this helpful2235

All this user's reviews

9

moviemitch96Dec 15, 2017

This is without a doubt a beautifully-made love letter to film fans from Guillermo del Toro! Sally Hawkins gives what I'd easily consider her best performance yet, along with an always chillingly reliable turn from Michael Shannon. StrongThis is without a doubt a beautifully-made love letter to film fans from Guillermo del Toro! Sally Hawkins gives what I'd easily consider her best performance yet, along with an always chillingly reliable turn from Michael Shannon. Strong turns from Richard Jenkins and Octavia Spencer round out the supporting cast. The film is breathtakingly beautiful from start to finish, with not just the cast and their performances, but also the gorgeous cinematography and many striking shots throughout, along with an at times haunting, yet beautiful and heartwarming story! Overall, I'd easily consider this del Toro's best film yet! It's undeniably full of magic, wonder, and dark, yet fantastical beauty!… Expand

3 of 10 users found this helpful37

All this user's reviews

6

BHBarryDec 15, 2017

“The Shape of Water” is a film conceived and directed by Guillermo del Toro and stars Sally Hawkins, Michael Stuhlbarg, Michael Shannon, Richard Jenkins and Octavia Spenser .This is a difficult film to review and rate because it requires the“The Shape of Water” is a film conceived and directed by Guillermo del Toro and stars Sally Hawkins, Michael Stuhlbarg, Michael Shannon, Richard Jenkins and Octavia Spenser .This is a difficult film to review and rate because it requires the viewer to make a huge leap of faith and to “just go with it” even though the plot and some of the scenes defy reality. Although Mr. del Toro may have had a strong message to deliver, this cold war version of the lighter film “Splash” (with Tom Hanks and Darryl Hannah) doesn’t communicate it well. I found it difficult for the audience to get lost in it and truly believe what is occurring on the screen. The film is over 2 hours in length and even though I never looked at my watch, I was very conscious of its duration. I give the film a 6.0 rating with special acknowledgment to Mr. Jenkins who can’t perform badly, regardless of the vehicle he is in.… Expand

7 of 13 users found this helpful76

All this user's reviews

10

The3AcademySinsDec 13, 2017

The Shape of Water might be Guillermo Del Toro's best movie yet, and THAT is saying something. This film is an incredibly timely (and timeless!) ensemble-driven romance that takes place in such a fantastical world, but then you realize it isThe Shape of Water might be Guillermo Del Toro's best movie yet, and THAT is saying something. This film is an incredibly timely (and timeless!) ensemble-driven romance that takes place in such a fantastical world, but then you realize it is our world. The performances are strong across the board with Sally Hawkins, Michael Shannon, Doug Jones, Octavia Spencer, Michael Sthulbarg, and Richard Jenkins really shining. The score is incredible. The motiffs and themes and shots are so incredibly layered that you will find new things with this movie every time you watch it. The Shape of Water is a must-see for film goers, a must-own for Del Toro fans, and a very strong Oscar Contender for 2017.… Expand

6 of 16 users found this helpful610

All this user's reviews

9

PrettyGoodDec 13, 2017

Beautiful, heartwarming and pleasing. A touching love story. The visuals and the art direction are perfect. Del Toro made a perfectly packaged fairy tale. A little predictable, but still one of the best movies of the year.

6 of 15 users found this helpful69

All this user's reviews

9

zorraDec 12, 2017

Superb art direction & effects. This beautiful fantasy-fairy tale lives up to the hype. It's led its humor & sincerity. Fantastic performances by Sally Hawkins & cast. del Toro has made a masterpiece.

5 of 12 users found this helpful57

All this user's reviews

8

zarrah28Dec 12, 2017

A beautiful & romantic story led by the wonderful Sally Hawkins who plays a hearing-impaired government worker. Octavia Spencer & Michael Shannon are fantastic as back-up. Beautiful art direction. One of del Toro's finest.

7 of 14 users found this helpful77

All this user's reviews

9

Brent_MarchantDec 9, 2017

Though at times a little predictable, this inventive fantasy/fairy tale delivers the goods with superb special effects, gentle humor, heartwarming sincerity, and a host of excellent performances, especially by Sally Hawkins, Octavia SpencerThough at times a little predictable, this inventive fantasy/fairy tale delivers the goods with superb special effects, gentle humor, heartwarming sincerity, and a host of excellent performances, especially by Sally Hawkins, Octavia Spencer and Richard Jenkins. Think "Beauty and the Beast" meets "E.T.," and you've got a good idea what's going on here. It's so satisfying to see a film that truly lives up to its pre-release hype.… Expand

6 of 14 users found this helpful68

All this user's reviews

9

StevieGJDDec 9, 2017

What a beautiful and romantic movie. The visual aesthetic of this film is so captivating. The varied green tones embedded in every scene are lovely. The art direction is astonishing. This looks like the early 60s. The acting isWhat a beautiful and romantic movie. The visual aesthetic of this film is so captivating. The varied green tones embedded in every scene are lovely. The art direction is astonishing. This looks like the early 60s. The acting is universally great. Sally Hawkins, Richard Jenkins and Octavia Spencer are simply perfect in their roles. Michael Shannon is the bad guy (perhaps too bad) and he is up to the task as well. The movie is about how we tend to view those of different races, genders, cultures, nations, and species as "the other" and this "other" needs to be blamed for our lot and hated for its existence. The greater meaning of this allegory is too sad to contemplate. Only those whose hearts are open, will understand "The Shape of Water".… Expand

8 of 17 users found this helpful89

All this user's reviews

10

PAYAMFURYDec 3, 2017

گیلرمو دل تورو کارگردان توتنمند و عالی این روز های سینما است.او از وقتی که پسر جهنمی رو ساخت مشهور شد و این فیلم رومنس و هیجان انگیز عالی که با بازی عالی مایکل شنون است فیلم شهکاری رو ارائه میدهد.گیلرمو دل تورو کارگردان توتنمند و عالی این روز های سینما است.او از وقتی که پسر جهنمی رو ساخت مشهور شد و این فیلم رومنس و هیجان انگیز عالی که با بازی عالی مایکل شنون است فیلم شهکاری رو ارائه میدهد.

21 of 64 users found this helpful2143

All this user's reviews

The Shape of Water

User Reviews