The Shape of Water
Fox Searchlight Pictures | Release Date: December 1, 2017
7.0
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 1067 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
751
Mixed:
170
Negative:
146
Watch Now
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
8
VirgonoShakaMar 24, 2018
This movie is weird... not in a bad way mind you, but still, sooo weird. I can say without doubt that it has been a while since a movie left me with this much confusion about it after watching it. Nevertheless, Guillermo Del Toro is a masterThis movie is weird... not in a bad way mind you, but still, sooo weird. I can say without doubt that it has been a while since a movie left me with this much confusion about it after watching it. Nevertheless, Guillermo Del Toro is a master at his craft, and he really brings his A game to this movie, which even if unusual in its idea and tone, is excellently crafted and directed. I can say that I really recommend it, but can't guarantee that you would enjoy it, because it may not be for everyone. Nevertheless, watching it is a very fascinating experience.… Expand
0 of 5 users found this helpful05
All this user's reviews
8
KeithDowDec 22, 2017
The Shape of Water stands out for the way Guillermo del Toro is able to give this fantasy-laden film such a distinct time and place, in this case a military research facility set in the 1960’s, which highlights del Toro’s masterfulThe Shape of Water stands out for the way Guillermo del Toro is able to give this fantasy-laden film such a distinct time and place, in this case a military research facility set in the 1960’s, which highlights del Toro’s masterful screenwriting ability. The writing is further gilded by its intellectual depth, with characters remarking about the origin of certain words and names, or drawing on biblical references to better frame the predicaments they’re in. And if del Toro only wrote the screenplay, he’d still be receiving acclaim, yet this entire production is his. All told, he’s credited as the writer, director, and producer.

The film exhibits an alluring, Amelie-like color profile, with water motifs throughout, featuring a career-making performance by Sally Hawkins. The selective use of nudity and sexuality adds a real sense of depth and fullness to her role, making the character seem that much more lifelike, and Hawkins certainly makes the most of it.

Her performance is quite simply magnanimous. She’s outwardly tender and sweet, with an inner strength and resolve that manifests itself whenever the occasion calls. It’s a combination of perfect casting and the actress rising to the occasion that, in my estimation, places her as the odds on favorite to win the Golden Globe for Best Performance by an actress in a drama, for which she’s currently nominated, and the Academy Award in the same category, for which she most certainly will be nominated.… Expand
4 of 10 users found this helpful46
All this user's reviews
8
eli_fjrApr 19, 2018
This is extremely moving. Slow paced but so great to watch for just the visuals.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
BITESCREENJan 23, 2018
Baltimore, 1962: Die stumme Träumerin Elisa (Sally Hawkins) arbeitet als Putzfrau in einem US-Geheimlabor – dennoch prägen ihr Leben Einsamkeit und Langeweile. Beides ändert sich, als ein allzu menschliches Fischmonster das neuesteBaltimore, 1962: Die stumme Träumerin Elisa (Sally Hawkins) arbeitet als Putzfrau in einem US-Geheimlabor – dennoch prägen ihr Leben Einsamkeit und Langeweile. Beides ändert sich, als ein allzu menschliches Fischmonster das neueste Forschungsobjekt gibt. Die Außenseiter werden zu Gefährten – doch ein fieser Sicherheitschef mit Gottkomplex (Michael Shannon) hat gehörig was dagegen. Shape of Water – Das Flüstern des Wassers ist Guillermo del Toros bester Film seit Pan’s Labyrinth: Das Fantasy-Drama bietet mit einem nicht ganz taufrischen Kalter-Krieg-Szenario und dem platten Plot zwar kaum Tiefe oder Überraschungen – dafür wird es ziemlich spannend und noch emotionaler. Viel wichtiger aber: Von den zauberhaften Bildern, über den gerade Golden-Globe-prämierten Soundtrack bis hin zum frech aus Der Schrecken vom Amazonas gemopsten Monster ist der Film ein glaubwürdiges Liebesbekenntnis ans alte Hollywood-Kino.… Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
8
marymaebennettJan 4, 2018
Last year for NYE, I watched Arrival and this NYE I watched The Shape of Water. Both movies are about trying to communicate with monsters. Weird coincidence. The first movie I watched in theatres this year was Hidden Figures, the last movie ILast year for NYE, I watched Arrival and this NYE I watched The Shape of Water. Both movies are about trying to communicate with monsters. Weird coincidence. The first movie I watched in theatres this year was Hidden Figures, the last movie I watched was, of course, The Shape of Water. Both movies are about trying to make further scientific discoveries than Russia. Weird coincidence. So, why did it take me this long to write a review? I don't know. I don't know how I feel about this movie. It was very unique in premise but it felt very paint by numbers in structure. It was like they read a book on the rules of screenwriting and decided they needed to incorporate every rule. The color wheel was a bit on the nose. The Hitchcock rule was definitely implemented. The allusions were there. I'm sure there were more but it's been a while since I've seen it. I did like the movie and the rules were effective but I just wonder for a movie all about not playing it safe, why did they play it so safe?… Expand
3 of 9 users found this helpful36
All this user's reviews
8
JLuis_001Jan 11, 2018
Guillermo del Toro takes the reins of the story of Beauty and The Beast and exposes it in film with every part of his style.

In general terms, I certainly think that the film could have been better in terms of story because I think it wasn'tGuillermo del Toro takes the reins of the story of Beauty and The Beast and exposes it in film with every part of his style.

In general terms, I certainly think that the film could have been better in terms of story because I think it wasn't really strong enough. The development of the characters is kinda poor because soon you realize that the only character that matters is Sally Hawkins character: Elisa Esposito but I've gotta say, she does a magnificent job as a mute janitor, who without words manages to be enormously expressive.

When I say the story wasn't strong enough I say it because the way in which it unfolds is very fortuitous, there is no background for the characters and the relationship that Elisa and the creature develop is too fast for my taste, especially considering the deep love that Elisa develops for him.

Michael Shannon is a one-dimensional villain and I'm surprised that Del Toro wasted him in that way.

Putting that aside, The Shape of Water is a very well done film, with an impeccable production that bears all the signature of Del Toro. The music is exceptional, one of the best scores of Alexandre Desplat and in general the film is very enjoyable, it is two hours of good entertainment, quality entertainment and yes it's honestly the best film of del Toro since Pan's Labyrinth. No doubt the magic is still there, but I think a little shake in terms of narrative would not hurt him, I feel that Guillermo can evolve and create much more complex stories and I think it's necessary for him to do so because he may fall into a creative hole and the worst thing that could happen to him is to be repetitive.… Expand
3 of 9 users found this helpful36
All this user's reviews
8
AliashhadiMar 6, 2018
I'm not really fan this kind of movie but I like this(shape of water). It takes us to own world and dark world where love is most powerful thing.
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
8
zarrah28Dec 12, 2017
A beautiful & romantic story led by the wonderful Sally Hawkins who plays a hearing-impaired government worker. Octavia Spencer & Michael Shannon are fantastic as back-up. Beautiful art direction. One of del Toro's finest.
7 of 14 users found this helpful77
All this user's reviews
8
ffejeryDec 17, 2017
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. It was a smart fairy tale. It's a collage of things we've already seen but put together in a unique way. Sally Hawkins' conveys so much emotion without saying a word. The supporting cast is great too. The 60's sets are cool and the cinematography is beautiful. The water motif is consistent through out. That being said allow me to switch into a Jungian analysis of the story in the context of the 1960's sexual revolution:

I thought the sea creature symbolized feeling shame for sexual desire. Under water represents the subconscious. She masturbates under water in the bathtub and the creature comes from under water. Then she boils eggs while masturbating and uses the eggs in the lab to lure the creature up from under water at the lab. Later they have sex in the bath tub. I think the movie is set in the 1960's to coincide with the sexual revolution. Thanks to the pill, more women were able to have sex for pleasure. Society had to reconcile that with more established conservative beliefs. This is the symbolism of the creature being smuggled out of the lab and into society. That was an interesting digression. At any rate, it's worth checking out. It's not a gangster movie even though the main character does end up sleeping with the fishes.… Expand
6 of 11 users found this helpful65
All this user's reviews
8
oddtimesFeb 7, 2018
An excellent movie. Sally Hawkins does again what "Hollywood" actresses are totally incapable of, and Michael Shannon succeeds again at creating a unique character. The movie just needed a couple of more scenes in the first half to establishAn excellent movie. Sally Hawkins does again what "Hollywood" actresses are totally incapable of, and Michael Shannon succeeds again at creating a unique character. The movie just needed a couple of more scenes in the first half to establish the relationship and the "Asset's" intelligence. The second half of the movie is truly great. Shape of Water is an excellent example that a really good movie can be made with a simple story, interesting sets and great cast.… Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
8
zymase4Jan 31, 2018
Guillermo del Toro revels in telling fantastical stories that take place in a time and place familiar to his audience. Much like his 2006 film Pan’s Labyrinth, there is an historical context that provides impetus for a plot not entirely ofGuillermo del Toro revels in telling fantastical stories that take place in a time and place familiar to his audience. Much like his 2006 film Pan’s Labyrinth, there is an historical context that provides impetus for a plot not entirely of our world. Set in Baltimore at the height of the Cold War, The Shape of Water is an exploration of loneliness and love; of isolation and compassion.

The real delight in the film comes from its set design. This is familiar territory for del Toro following the excellent backdrops in Crimson Peak, but where Peak deals in lofty Gothic architecture, Water revels in classic Americana: a Cadillac dealership replete with drool-worthy cars; a theater with gilded balconies and a gorgeous marquee. Sets in a research lab conjure fantasy and science fiction, highlighted by an art deco pool that’s the pinnacle of production designer Paul D. Austerberry’s construction.

The Shape of Water’s use of color resonates as much as the design. Full of greens and blues, the aquamarine palette employed throughout helps to amplify the fairy tale elements being woven into an everyday setting. Much of the latter half of the film benefits from the buoyancy the use of color lends it, and it fleshes out del Toro’s world.

Where the fantasy doesn’t quite work is the romance. It is difficult, even with the excellent protagonists of the as-credited “Amphibian Man,” to suspend disbelief and buy in to the protagonist’s attraction – especially the desire for intimacy. One can’t help but be reminded of the NASA-funded study on communication with dolphins in which a researcher developed feelings for one of her subjects, and consummated the relationship. And since this is, after all, a fairy tale and a love story, it’s a central theme that is difficult to connect with, even in a beautifully-designed film with so much going for it.… Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
8
MarvelJoeMar 7, 2018
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. A mute woman bangs with a fish that stands like a human? Guillermo del Toro has a great taste in fanfictions. Turns out she has gills! Now that's a great sci-fi fantasy movie right there.… Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
8
MaxKirkMar 5, 2018
To call this movie original is an understatement. This is a one of kind movie with great performances from both the leading actress and supporting roles. To be honest, I didn't quite know how to rate this movie after I had seen it because ofTo call this movie original is an understatement. This is a one of kind movie with great performances from both the leading actress and supporting roles. To be honest, I didn't quite know how to rate this movie after I had seen it because of the simple reason that it is extremely weird in an artsy and beautiful way. But after I have done some thinking I would say that this movie is an odd masterpiece. The acting is great, the cinematography is top notch and the score was mind-boggling. The movie seems like a regular love story, but there is something way deeper here, something with the shape of water.… Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
8
AndrewBurgeApr 16, 2018
It is easy to see why Guillermo del Toro's 'The Shape of Water' won Best Picture at the Oscars. It mixes its ideas and concepts with luxurious and exquisitely designed cinematography, ever-present and polished score and a near compulsiveIt is easy to see why Guillermo del Toro's 'The Shape of Water' won Best Picture at the Oscars. It mixes its ideas and concepts with luxurious and exquisitely designed cinematography, ever-present and polished score and a near compulsive obsession with details when it comes to set decoration. All in all, this is a very pretty film to watch.

But, this is not what makes it special. It is rather the way this imagery is not shallow and pedantic without any effect. Del Toro puts his money where his mouth is and presents us with true ambitious directing and writing when it comes to presenting the love story between a mute janitor Eliza (Sally Hawkins) working at a top secret research facility during the Cold War era and 'The Asset'; an amphibious and marvelous creature. You wanted diversity? Honestly, it doesn't get more diverse than this.

Still, there are a few flaws, unfortunately. Despite the near-perfect pacing of the action and daring but at the same time tamed sex scenes, there are a few hiccups here and there that break the magic of this fantastical love story. Like Giles' (Richard Jenkins), Eliza's only friend, homosexual approach towards a friendly waiter and a racist scene involving the same waiter not letting a Negro couple sit at the table. Of course, this all makes sense, its the 60s.

It is easy to compare 'The Shape of Water' with del Toro's 2006 masterpiece, "Pan's Labyrinth", both involving a fantastic hidden world in a political unsettling backdrop, but the magic is cut short here. There is also a scene in which Eliza dreams of singing and dancing with the monster, which is beautiful but is also a bit cringe-worthy. Yet the amphibious creature is more than it seems. It presents supernatural powers of healing and displays superiority against his captor, Richard Strickland (Michael Shannon) a supremacist and self-loathing American man charged with the security of The Asset. Why did it show its powers so late in the film, its a mystery. But at least its powers are renowned, for as Strickland, considering the beast a primitive and inferior being, in the end claims 'F**k, you are a god!'

If it wasn't for the sublime and crystal polished execution of all its technical elements (and some artistic ones) this film would have been worse. But, let's not forget that is the imagery and the sound the exclusive elements of cinema. I mean, the Academy definitely holds true to this and respects filmmakers which endorse that idea.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
Bheath2002Mar 11, 2018
Absolutely gorgeous. Shot beautifully amazing characters brilliant twist on the classic fairytale model. A few things that took me out if it occasionally with a bit too much nudity. Almost Perfect.
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
8
theCRITIC2May 21, 2018
Guillermo del Toro has proven was again that he is in fact one of the best director working in Hollywood. The Shape of Water brings us a concept that has never been done in the history of film making before. Although the concept of an "adultGuillermo del Toro has proven was again that he is in fact one of the best director working in Hollywood. The Shape of Water brings us a concept that has never been done in the history of film making before. Although the concept of an "adult fairy tale" isn't new (in fact he already did it back in 2006 with Pan's Labyrinth) but the idea of a girl felling in love with an amphibian-like creature is pretty interesting. One of the great things this film has to offer is its cinematography, it's very astounding. The color palette of this film just brings you the vibe of something cold. The direction is also amazing. My only issue with this film is that the ending kinda suck for me. I think it got a little cheesier or became so predictable. Overall, it's a great film and del Toro is a great director.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
GrantD243Apr 25, 2018
I had high expectations going into The Shape of Water following the slew award nominations that it received. And, unfortunately, it didn't quite live up to them. It's a visually stunning film; there's no doubt about that. And Guillermo delI had high expectations going into The Shape of Water following the slew award nominations that it received. And, unfortunately, it didn't quite live up to them. It's a visually stunning film; there's no doubt about that. And Guillermo del Toro once again proved that he is a great director (and possibly the best when it comes to monster movies), but the story was ultimately disappointing to me. It was extremely simple and didn't have a whole lot of depth to it. Yes, it's interesting to see a woman fall in love with a non-human being, but take away the fact that it wasn't human and it was not a a very far throw away from a typical love story. At the same time, the slightly lackluster story doesn't take away from some incredible performances in this film, from Sally Hawkins to Michael Shannon...they are all fantastic. But, I still can't get this film to a B+ or an A simply because the story just didn't do it for me. And I'm incredibly disappointed to say that.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
EgeBerkAug 12, 2018
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I think it's a super movie as I said in the title. It's got a great story. The acting is even great, but I do not think it's the shape of water among the nine movies that are nominated for the best film this year.

Guillermo del Toro has officially created a new world, which again has beautiful backgrounds as in every movie. I liked the Crimson Peak movie before that but I could not show success in the same way.I am very pleased that Guillermo del Toro has succeeded in this film, which is a favorite of almost every film.

Now let's just say that I'm not really a super movie but I did not give a lot of information about the creature and I could not understand some places for example, what is this creature, what is the place, how it got in and how it got caught. Why all the people behaved close to the elisa while torturing him and he did not see him as a monster

the super powers of creation could do a lot of things, but I could not understand some of the details about it, so I finally remember how Elisa eventually turned into something like that and the scar was on the other side.

but the movie really took me to a whole new world. It was so beautiful that it was like I was really living if I was not in a movie. Finally I like the movie very much but I do not think it is good enough to win the best movie award.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Vitor007Sep 2, 2018
Emotional, romantic, and unbelievable. Guillermo del Toro makes us believe in the improbable union between a mute housekeeper and an aquatic creature. A single movie. He plays on small points, but makes viewers come out thinking about the endEmotional, romantic, and unbelievable. Guillermo del Toro makes us believe in the improbable union between a mute housekeeper and an aquatic creature. A single movie. He plays on small points, but makes viewers come out thinking about the end of the movie. Passionate. 8.8/10… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
DoniJrNov 8, 2018
'The Shape of Water' it's a beautiful fairytale released in dark times, even if in it's setting period times were dark as well. I love how Del Toro transforms the so called monster in creatures with feelings, just like us, and in this film he'The Shape of Water' it's a beautiful fairytale released in dark times, even if in it's setting period times were dark as well. I love how Del Toro transforms the so called monster in creatures with feelings, just like us, and in this film he not only humanizes a monster but also empower real life "monsters" that were persecued not only in old times but still struggle with death, violence and isolation just because of how they were born.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Mikibruno02Nov 8, 2020
A nice movie. Desplat's soundtrack, in typical French style, lulls the viewer. The plot is compelling and, how to say, in some ways "delicate". Enjoyable film with a meaning that everyone can grasp. Nothing else to add: 8.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
glommanMay 22, 2021
This is a quite unusual love-story, in which a mute woman falls in love with a non-human demi-god from the Amazon Rainforest who's held captive. I generally loved the secretive Cold War atmosphere and look the movie always portrays, while theThis is a quite unusual love-story, in which a mute woman falls in love with a non-human demi-god from the Amazon Rainforest who's held captive. I generally loved the secretive Cold War atmosphere and look the movie always portrays, while the story itself is tense but ultimately not as special or enthralling as it could have been.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
JonSnow2049Aug 20, 2019
The Shape of Water is interesting and original fanasy movie with not bad script. This is not the best movie of 2017, but I enjoyed by watching of it.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
MartinAZFeb 2, 2021
A fairy tale set in post-modern America. A tale about a princess without voice and the monster that almost destroyed it all. Guillermo Del Toro tells a heartwarming story. The design of the creature is amazing! The lead actress (SallyA fairy tale set in post-modern America. A tale about a princess without voice and the monster that almost destroyed it all. Guillermo Del Toro tells a heartwarming story. The design of the creature is amazing! The lead actress (Sally Hawkins) compliments the story and the support actor (Richard Jenkins) does a wonderful narration.

What I hated. When a world is presented as realistic, it posses a question as to what exactly "realistic" means. As far as I know, the only two mythical components are the creature and Elisa. Any government, at any time of handling such a sensitive asset would not behave in this way. Any one who knows about area 51 can tell how guarded alien evidence is handled (Even if it's the 1960's). The creature is not only alien but has proven to poses abilities and the Russians aren't interested when told?

How cleaning ladies managed is not only unbelievable but an insult to how sensitive government information is handled. There weren't even guards at the cleaning vans and only one camera that was easily tilted up because they left barrels underneath. Are there no guards watching this kind of sensitive asset or this government can't afford 2 or 5 more guards.

This kind of incompetence is very subtle and littered through out the movie. It is every clear that Guillermo Del Toro shows us how characters out wit the government on a bases of clumsiness and luck.

With that said; clumsiness and luck aren't uncommon. There is a ton that I love and the pros out weigh the cons. I recommend to not only watch this movie but it falls in my category or must owns.

I give the Shape of Water a 8.5 out of 10. A modern fairytale story.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
NickTheCritickApr 19, 2022
Elisa, a mute young woman, works in a Baltimore science laboratory where the Americans are fighting the Cold War. Employed as a cleaning lady, Elisa is deeply friends with Zelda, an African-American colleague who fights for her rights inElisa, a mute young woman, works in a Baltimore science laboratory where the Americans are fighting the Cold War. Employed as a cleaning lady, Elisa is deeply friends with Zelda, an African-American colleague who fights for her rights in marriage and society, and Giles, a homosexual neighbor who is discriminated against at work. Several in a world of reassuring-looking monsters, they discover that in the laboratory an amphibious creature of great intelligence and sensitivity survives in captivity. To reveal them is Elisa. Condemned to silence and solitude, she falls in love in return for that mystery capable of living between water and air. But their sentiment will soon have to deal with a hostile hierarchy embodied by the despotic Strickland. In the midst of the Cold War against the Russians, the United States spared no expense and cruelty. To secure a stellar future, Strickland is determined to do anything. A very beautiful film characterized by wonderful direction and photography. One of Del Toro's best films and a hymn to ethereal and impossible love.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
jackctierney05Mar 10, 2022
A unique romance that offers a thrilling view to a masterful take on a heart-wrenching love story.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
RtheomJan 14, 2018
This is basically "Beauty and the Beast" with del Toro visuals. Overall a very enjoyable movie although at bit too long. There are a number of scenes that are absolutely unnecessary, but absolutely del Toro. If you're the kind of person thatThis is basically "Beauty and the Beast" with del Toro visuals. Overall a very enjoyable movie although at bit too long. There are a number of scenes that are absolutely unnecessary, but absolutely del Toro. If you're the kind of person that likes his more artistic movies and watches them specifically for the visuals, you'll love this. If you find his movies enjoyable, but not magical, you'll still enjoy this, but wish it was shorter, like me. I'd place Pan's Labyrinth higher than this, but it's a close second to that and feels nearly the same. A solid 8 as far as acting, visuals and direction goes, but -1 point down to a 7 for the length.… Expand
4 of 10 users found this helpful46
All this user's reviews
7
eagleeyevikingDec 28, 2019
"The Shape of Water" is a simple, beautifully told, and uplifting romantic dark fantasy film that showcases a director in his prime as well as actors at their best.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
bfoore90Mar 16, 2018
A quality film with great shots and exceptional acting especially from Sally Hawkins, Michael Shannon, Octavia Spencer and Richard Jenkins. The plot is simple in the spirit of Beauty and the Beast with good social commentary and reallyA quality film with great shots and exceptional acting especially from Sally Hawkins, Michael Shannon, Octavia Spencer and Richard Jenkins. The plot is simple in the spirit of Beauty and the Beast with good social commentary and really impressive visuals. The problem for me was the pacing, it was tedious and long plus some typical cliche's that come from the plot but overall its a fine movie. Is it one of Del Toro's best? Hard to say but it is a fine movie nonetheless.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
LinttaFlamingoFeb 11, 2018
The Shape Of Water is a very good film.

Sally Hawkins gives probably my favorite performance of 2017 here. She's perfect. Especially in a scene where her character Elisa, who by the way is mute, talks in sign language very aggressively toThe Shape Of Water is a very good film.

Sally Hawkins gives probably my favorite performance of 2017 here. She's perfect. Especially in a scene where her character Elisa, who by the way is mute, talks in sign language very aggressively to Richard Jenkins. The acting was fantastic. And the movie is just as original as Pan's Labyrinth. Gorgeous, especially the underwater scenes that were simply beautiful. Creative and surprisingly romantic. The whole first act when we see Elisa and the creature together is so good. It's interesting, sweet, charming and has a very fitting soundtrack. That said though, there are some problems. Even though the villain is a lot better than many, there are a lot of scenes of him just talking with some other characters about how dangerous the creature is and what to do to it. This is essential to know once, not 20 times. Those scenes broke the immersion a lot and I was mostly just hoping for the movie to go back to Elisa and the creature. There was also a big feeling of deja-vu quite often when it comes to the characters in this movie and Pan's Labyrinth. It's not a problem in itself, but a couple things were pretty predictable because of it. The final act is excellent though. We get more of Elisa and the creature, more of the villain actually doing instead of telling and a very good ending.

All around a very good film, although there's a scene where a cat dies. Sorry Guillermo, but one point taken off for that.… Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
7
RalfbergsJul 12, 2018
Movie was good, but not great like they put it. I mean of course it had many interesting aspect and the story is quite ok, but at the same time all of the story is quite simple and there are no real surprises or anything in it really, besidesMovie was good, but not great like they put it. I mean of course it had many interesting aspect and the story is quite ok, but at the same time all of the story is quite simple and there are no real surprises or anything in it really, besides the weird parts… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
abm0Mar 15, 2018
Not bad, but it was either rushed or simply didn't have that much to say. I kind of expected more from it than just a nice fairytale where the Beast happens to be a merman. Probably still better than the actual Beauty and the Beast, but...Not bad, but it was either rushed or simply didn't have that much to say. I kind of expected more from it than just a nice fairytale where the Beast happens to be a merman. Probably still better than the actual Beauty and the Beast, but... not something I'm going to come back to re-watch.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
drrealitycheckJan 21, 2018
The movie is a surrealistic, romantic and sometime satirical film which takes the old grade Z "creature from the black lagoon" flicks of the 50s and brings them into modern concerns (albeit in a 1962 setting) and adult themes. A Cold WarThe movie is a surrealistic, romantic and sometime satirical film which takes the old grade Z "creature from the black lagoon" flicks of the 50s and brings them into modern concerns (albeit in a 1962 setting) and adult themes. A Cold War setting, a picture of early 60s racism and the struggles of loneliness are sub-themes.… Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
7
DubeauMar 4, 2018
This a love movie, but also an allegory about isolation and loneliness. The story has one fantastic element, but apart that everything feels almost grounded. Really love the actors in this movie. They were amazing. The creature effects areThis a love movie, but also an allegory about isolation and loneliness. The story has one fantastic element, but apart that everything feels almost grounded. Really love the actors in this movie. They were amazing. The creature effects are spot on. Now for the parts I didn't like...the creature felt like recycling the idea of Abe in Hellboy. At least it's in another context and time frame. The pace of the movie is slow, so I got really bored in the middle of the movie and I skipped a lot after that. I think the editing and the length could have been a bit more dynamic. The music is also an era style of music that were found in old musical movies. I wasn't very found of it, but that depends of your taste in the genre. Still, it was an interesting movie and a very nice tale. I give it a 75%. Go see it for the actors and their skills in that movie.… Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
7
dragionnatsu66Jan 10, 2018
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Really good acting, Really good directing, Beautiful score, Excellent cinematography but with A mediocre story and some cheesy dialogue scenes. If you are someone who is impressed with the technical aspects of film-making, you'll love it . Or If you're like me and you find the story where a woman, prison breaks a fish creature and hides it in her home , then proceeds to have coitus with 'IT', and you find that a bit weird, then I guess you can still appreciate the film for being visually stunning- 7/10… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
RroyJan 7, 2018
Good story that celebrates diversity (and could have done it more subtly) but which is not as strong (by far) as Pan’s Labyrinth.
2 of 6 users found this helpful24
All this user's reviews
7
XirhannaFeb 2, 2018
This movie left me question what is and isn't acceptable in society anymore. It was good but a bit graphic at times.
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
7
ianglaucoFeb 22, 2018
las escenas que no combinan, el sexo y los desnudos con un monstruo fantasioso no combina, la critica al capitalismo en el calidac, con un musiucal, y los ideales de igualdad con un final que separa a la gente normal de la anormal. quizas sealas escenas que no combinan, el sexo y los desnudos con un monstruo fantasioso no combina, la critica al capitalismo en el calidac, con un musiucal, y los ideales de igualdad con un final que separa a la gente normal de la anormal. quizas sea una linda y cursi historia de amor libre, pero no totalmente poser y kitch… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
7
madmal69Mar 21, 2018
Well produced story with great music, visuals, some fabulous quotes woven into the script here and there but overall, I found it to be lackluster and not as 'life-changing' as I expected it to be. It would not have made my top list andWell produced story with great music, visuals, some fabulous quotes woven into the script here and there but overall, I found it to be lackluster and not as 'life-changing' as I expected it to be. It would not have made my top list and certainly did not deserve to win, in my view.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
jj230Jun 11, 2018
After seeing the movie one gets the feeling of having slept through the part in which she falls in love with the creature. It all happens too fast, the viewers don´t have the time to absorve the feeling or to enjoy the process of these twoAfter seeing the movie one gets the feeling of having slept through the part in which she falls in love with the creature. It all happens too fast, the viewers don´t have the time to absorve the feeling or to enjoy the process of these two falling for each other.
Although the places of the scenes are repetitive, the beauty of this movie is undeniable, everithing fits perfectly with the mood.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
DovahKJul 2, 2018
Adoro el mundo que ha creado Guillermo del Toro alrededor de la necesidad uno del otro de los personajes. En la rareza de la película está su encanto, y esa estética... me encanta, simplemente.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
JeBjBoMay 25, 2022
It's a cute movie! Loveable characters, stellar performance by Sally Hawkins, and I loved to hate Michael Shannon.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
DMLYxCriticDec 26, 2019
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Personally, I would have given this movie a higher score. I really wanted to, but the plot holes, the acting, the story and the character motivations are somehow problematic. The cinematography and the makeup is good. I mean, you can’t expect anything less from a del Toro film, but the story is just too unbelievable for me. It also lacks proper backstory which will keep the viewer guessing, in a negative way. The acting isn’t that much good, either, although I do have to give credit to Michael Shannon and Michael Stuhlbarg for giving good performances. But on a positive note, the film works as a charm, tugging us audiences’ heartstrings and mesmerizing us with a beautiful, bleak, yet vividly-colored picture.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
FilmanwaltDec 17, 2020
Touching story between two different species. The chemistry is right and understandable, but otherwise a musical interlude tore me out a bit and was unnecessary for me. The subtle tone should have been retained here.

The end was a nice roundTouching story between two different species. The chemistry is right and understandable, but otherwise a musical interlude tore me out a bit and was unnecessary for me. The subtle tone should have been retained here.

The end was a nice round conclusion.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Movie_FreakJul 26, 2020
The Shape Of Water did not deserve to get best picture. It won over Get Out, Lady Bird and Dunkirk??!! It's a good film, but just not a great one. I personally don't like how much audiences hate this movie.I think it's a really good technicalThe Shape Of Water did not deserve to get best picture. It won over Get Out, Lady Bird and Dunkirk??!! It's a good film, but just not a great one. I personally don't like how much audiences hate this movie.I think it's a really good technical achievement and has some outstanding performances. But it's a huge oscar bait. With Guillermo Del Toro as director and you have Octavia Spencer, Michael Shannon and Richard Jenkins in the cast with a score by Alexandre Desplat, what more could the oscars ask for? The movie is quite bland to me in the second half of the film. It starts off brilliantly, with a great script and beautiful production design. The film doesn't quite reach those levels in the second half, with it just feeling way too forced and dull. The ending is great though, with a heart-wrenching sequence. The score, editing, production design and costumes are masterful. Sally Hawkins and Richard Jenkins are outstanding in the film, with Del Toro's direction also noteworthy. But the script just feels way too plucky and bland. Don't get me wrong. I think it's a really good movie. IT's just that, Best picture?? Not thank you.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
AJ_13Sep 27, 2021
While being undeniably original, it lacks credibility. I also wish Del Toro would have been riskier, instead of being the typical feel-good movie that takes the easier paths.

Shannon and Hawkins performances, amazing production design andWhile being undeniably original, it lacks credibility. I also wish Del Toro would have been riskier, instead of being the typical feel-good movie that takes the easier paths.

Shannon and Hawkins performances, amazing production design and score help the film stay afloat (literally).… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
AgentLviJul 7, 2023
Decent movie. The story is so --so, scoring is great, visual is decent, and the voice is also great
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
BHBarryDec 15, 2017
“The Shape of Water” is a film conceived and directed by Guillermo del Toro and stars Sally Hawkins, Michael Stuhlbarg, Michael Shannon, Richard Jenkins and Octavia Spenser .This is a difficult film to review and rate because it requires the“The Shape of Water” is a film conceived and directed by Guillermo del Toro and stars Sally Hawkins, Michael Stuhlbarg, Michael Shannon, Richard Jenkins and Octavia Spenser .This is a difficult film to review and rate because it requires the viewer to make a huge leap of faith and to “just go with it” even though the plot and some of the scenes defy reality. Although Mr. del Toro may have had a strong message to deliver, this cold war version of the lighter film “Splash” (with Tom Hanks and Darryl Hannah) doesn’t communicate it well. I found it difficult for the audience to get lost in it and truly believe what is occurring on the screen. The film is over 2 hours in length and even though I never looked at my watch, I was very conscious of its duration. I give the film a 6.0 rating with special acknowledgment to Mr. Jenkins who can’t perform badly, regardless of the vehicle he is in.… Expand
7 of 13 users found this helpful76
All this user's reviews
6
namelessJan 3, 2018
This is such an individual film that I could have rated it green just as easly. The problem is that it is a Hollywood film for the first hour and then transforms into an Art film for the second hour. Art Films are fine but we all know thatThis is such an individual film that I could have rated it green just as easly. The problem is that it is a Hollywood film for the first hour and then transforms into an Art film for the second hour. Art Films are fine but we all know that Art Films are as formulaic as Hollywood films. There are some incredible scenes but the film really is a bunch of incredible scenes, it isn't a sum of its parts. Yes, her acting supports the film, she will be nomiated because she carries the film. It is a passion film of Del Toro but lacks the cohesiveness of Pan's Labyrinth. I'm waiting for the next Pacific Rim.… Expand
3 of 10 users found this helpful37
All this user's reviews
6
netflicDec 18, 2017
This latest movie from director Guillermo Del Toro is creating a lot of buzz. It has been nominated for Golden Globe in 7 categories and expected to win it's main prize. No doubt that it will be in the Oscar's list as well.

The movie isThis latest movie from director Guillermo Del Toro is creating a lot of buzz. It has been nominated for Golden Globe in 7 categories and expected to win it's main prize. No doubt that it will be in the Oscar's list as well.

The movie is listed as a mixture of 5 different genres but I would describe it as a pseudo-realistic fairy tale for adults.

It is a love story between a mute woman who cleans a high-security government institution and a semi-human, semi-amphibian creature that US Army caught in an ocean for research.

This artsy film recreates an atmosphere of Cold-War-era America with enchanting visuals and music and it is pleasant to watch most of the time.
So I understand why so many people praise it. On the other hand, in my opinion, the hype is not justified. The movie is not targeted to children. Yet all characters are caricaturish: either all-out villains or all-out do-gooders.

There are many annoying details that scream of poor directing. And don't even get me started about cliches: you can hardly find one that is missing here.

There are three superb actors that have almost nothing to play due to a primitive script. But they still manage to impress.

So, after all, I am glad that I saw it. It *is* charming, but your mileage might vary.… Expand
4 of 10 users found this helpful46
All this user's reviews
6
StarmanDXFeb 3, 2018
As a big fan of Guillermo del Toro, I don't get the hype. Sure, it's a well polished movie with solid performances and dialogue. But it's predictable to the point of being boring and completely lacks the imaginative creativity that is theAs a big fan of Guillermo del Toro, I don't get the hype. Sure, it's a well polished movie with solid performances and dialogue. But it's predictable to the point of being boring and completely lacks the imaginative creativity that is the hallmark of movies like Pan's Labyrinth, Hellboy, Cronos and even Pacific Rim, to a lesser extent. Just does not even feel like a del Toro movie to me at all.… Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
6
OscarOrNotApr 1, 2018
I saw this not knowing anything about it except that it was directed by Guillermo del Toro. It was a good movie and I enjoyed it, but I was shocked when I heard months later that it won the Oscar. After seeing Three Billboards Outside Ebbing,I saw this not knowing anything about it except that it was directed by Guillermo del Toro. It was a good movie and I enjoyed it, but I was shocked when I heard months later that it won the Oscar. After seeing Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri I was even more certain than before that a simply good film has been elevated to god status. Dissapointing.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
jgzegerMar 9, 2018
A plain looking mute woman finds love with a fish. Who will the children look like?
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
6
Voodoo123May 13, 2018
Shape of water is a well crafted movie with all the usual trademark del toro charm in effect here. A sometimes interesting very visual journey that tells a very familiar story to a high standard. Like a lot of del toro works it suffers fromShape of water is a well crafted movie with all the usual trademark del toro charm in effect here. A sometimes interesting very visual journey that tells a very familiar story to a high standard. Like a lot of del toro works it suffers from feeling a little too much like watching events take place inside a comic book frame rather than a realistic location. This coupled with the predictable free willy/free e.t/ harry and the Henderson's vibe just felt a bit too familiar a story to be retold yet again. Despite this the quality is excellent and well produced.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
chesaroJan 15, 2018
This is at best a good movie, because it lack an original story, after around half an hour of watching it, you already know what is going to happen almost to the point that you don't need to get an explanaiton to some of the "misteries" ofThis is at best a good movie, because it lack an original story, after around half an hour of watching it, you already know what is going to happen almost to the point that you don't need to get an explanaiton to some of the "misteries" of the movie, i don't think it is a bad movie, but the praise it has gathered made me question what is considered a relevant movie in this days.… Expand
5 of 9 users found this helpful54
All this user's reviews
6
moviecritic68Jan 24, 2018
I read this movie will be up for the 2nd highest number of awards at the oscars. What this tells me is there were few films to compete last year. Although this film had some above average attributes I have a very hard time placing it in suchI read this movie will be up for the 2nd highest number of awards at the oscars. What this tells me is there were few films to compete last year. Although this film had some above average attributes I have a very hard time placing it in such high esteem. Yes it was well done but a far cry from previous oscar winners. Sorry critics ... the user composite score is much more in line than your ratings… Expand
7 of 10 users found this helpful73
All this user's reviews
6
aussiedude98May 12, 2018
I found the movie to be interesting - with some memorable scenes and visuals.
However it didn't really work for me - didn't hit me emotionally at all.
My expectations were probably set too high - knowing that it was highly rated and won an Oscar.
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
6
VancomycinFeb 3, 2018
Oppressively dark with lots of sex-stuff, Guillermo really put the "adult" in adult fairy tale on this one.
3 of 5 users found this helpful32
All this user's reviews
6
RatedRexDec 28, 2017
Sometimes they just try too hard to be original. This is one of those times. The story makes no sense. Even fairy-tales must have plausibility. I wanted to like "The Shape of Water". But in the end, it was just another example of HollywoodSometimes they just try too hard to be original. This is one of those times. The story makes no sense. Even fairy-tales must have plausibility. I wanted to like "The Shape of Water". But in the end, it was just another example of Hollywood types letting their imagination get out of hand.… Expand
11 of 18 users found this helpful117
All this user's reviews
6
TrailesqueJun 9, 2018
This was a big winner at the 2018 Academy Awards, which is a little surprising, given its subject and style. A shy, mute maid, who shares a home with a closeted gay artist, discovers something weird and wonderful at her job - a hominid seaThis was a big winner at the 2018 Academy Awards, which is a little surprising, given its subject and style. A shy, mute maid, who shares a home with a closeted gay artist, discovers something weird and wonderful at her job - a hominid sea creature who has some amazing powers. This sea-man is in the clutches of a sadistic military security officer who wants to kill and dissect him. So the maid decides she needs to try to rescue this being. Del Toro portrays the early 1960s as a time of oppressive conformity, cold war, homophobia et cetera, and the story becomes a very obvious parable about the struggles of those who are different from the norm. The cool visuals and sets manage to keep things interesting.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
thedaywalkerJan 21, 2018
It is a nice movie technically, the intensity of the scenes and the performances of the cast are what kept me in the movie until the end. Octavia Spencer and Richard Jenkins were great and Michael Shannon was fantastic. But there one majorIt is a nice movie technically, the intensity of the scenes and the performances of the cast are what kept me in the movie until the end. Octavia Spencer and Richard Jenkins were great and Michael Shannon was fantastic. But there one major flaw for me personally that made me enjoy the movie way less... I did not believe in their love, The main character and the humanoid amphibians loved is basically just based in their difficulty in communication, because that what they showed us, so it seems really shallow, so i think that took the magic of what could have been a fantastic movie.… Expand
5 of 7 users found this helpful52
All this user's reviews
6
zapVJan 26, 2018
It’s beautiful shot and atmospheric fairy tale intended for adults. The problem is that other than explicit scenes of violence and sex everything in this movie from characters to theme development stays on a level of a children’s story.
10 of 13 users found this helpful103
All this user's reviews
6
onelinereviewsFeb 26, 2018
Ultimately, this water is lukewarm – it got 99 set-ups, but a payoff ain't one.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
6
d0vla11Jan 2, 2019
What the hell have I just watched? This movie won 4 Oscars (the best Oscars actually), are you kidding me? Can't say the acting was bad and all, but everything else was **** and not developed enough, even the plot was so predictable from theWhat the hell have I just watched? This movie won 4 Oscars (the best Oscars actually), are you kidding me? Can't say the acting was bad and all, but everything else was **** and not developed enough, even the plot was so predictable from the very beginning. Oscars really have become a one big ****… Expand
3 of 3 users found this helpful30
All this user's reviews
6
Slovenly_MuseAug 31, 2018
A lush visual masterpiece powered by strong performances, I wanted to love it, but the thin supporting characters who never really get their moment, and story dots that fell frustratingly shy of connecting, left me coming out of this movieA lush visual masterpiece powered by strong performances, I wanted to love it, but the thin supporting characters who never really get their moment, and story dots that fell frustratingly shy of connecting, left me coming out of this movie ruminating on ways it could have been improved, rather than being blown away by what it achieved.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
SandyCameronOct 27, 2018
It just didn't click for me, partly because of the sickly green design (how so many critics loved the look is beyond me) and partly because of the moments of brutality, the fleeting glimpses of beauty (when Elisa signs to Giles that she's inIt just didn't click for me, partly because of the sickly green design (how so many critics loved the look is beyond me) and partly because of the moments of brutality, the fleeting glimpses of beauty (when Elisa signs to Giles that she's in love with the creature) are undermined. The multiple references to other tales and genres may make it "clever", but they don't add meaning. In the end I found Elisa's smile rather forced as one improbability piles on another and she doesn't notice. The reality and fantasy sat uneasily alongside each other.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
geewahJan 6, 2021
Weird but somehow quite predictable and boring. I'm not sure how this was Oscar winning material.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
LukasRyan1111Dec 14, 2020
Gorgeous to look at, stellar performances. The rest left me completely underwhelmed.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
Pan_KrytykMay 15, 2022
dobry film del toro... nic dodac nic ując ... warto zobaczyc jak juz nie masz co oglądac ;)
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
ALAMLEDPJan 19, 2023
In The Shape of Water, director Guillermo del Toro presents a dark fantasy-drama-romance-Cold War spy story set in 1962 Baltimore. The film follows Elisa Esposito, a mute woman who forms a connection with an amphibian creature held in aIn The Shape of Water, director Guillermo del Toro presents a dark fantasy-drama-romance-Cold War spy story set in 1962 Baltimore. The film follows Elisa Esposito, a mute woman who forms a connection with an amphibian creature held in a covert government facility. As Elisa and the creature, called Amphibian Man, develop a close bond, they must navigate the pressures to terminate the creature from both the US and the Soviet government and find a way to set him free. The film explores themes of love, acceptance, trust and inclusivity, but the romance between Elisa and Amphibian Man is rushed and feels flat. The film boasts del Toro's signature visuals and stylistic flair, with a warm vintage atmosphere and stunning underwater scenes. The score by Alexandre Desplat is also noteworthy. The cast, including Sally Hawkins, Richard Jenkins, Michael Stuhlbarg, and Octavia Spencer, give strong performances. Overall, while the film has a lot to say, the romance doesn't fully land.
______________________________
En La forma del agua, el director Guillermo del Toro presenta una oscura historia de espionaje de fantasía, drama, romance y Guerra Fría ambientada en 1962 en Baltimore. La película sigue a Elisa Esposito, una mujer muda que establece una conexión con una criatura anfibia retenida en una instalación gubernamental encubierta. A medida que Elisa y la criatura, llamada Hombre Anfibio, desarrollan un estrecho vínculo, deben sortear las presiones para eliminar a la criatura tanto del gobierno de EE. UU. como del gobierno soviético y encontrar una manera de liberarlo. La película explora temas de amor, aceptación, confianza e inclusión, pero el romance entre Elisa y el Hombre Anfibio es apresurado y se siente aburrido. La película cuenta con las características visuales y el estilo estilístico característicos de Del Toro, con una cálida atmósfera vintage e impresionantes escenas submarinas. Destaca también la partitura de Alexandre Desplat. El elenco, que incluye a Sally Hawkins, Richard Jenkins, Michael Stuhlbarg y Octavia Spencer, brinda excelentes actuaciones. En general, aunque la película tiene mucho que decir, el romance no aterriza del todo.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
BikerjamesApr 23, 2018
Nobody who lives in a second floor apartment building would intentionally flood their building with a room full of water. You cannot fill a bathroom entirely with water by sticking a towel under the door. When the creature eats her catNobody who lives in a second floor apartment building would intentionally flood their building with a room full of water. You cannot fill a bathroom entirely with water by sticking a towel under the door. When the creature eats her cat alive she is not even emotional when told. She doesn't seem to care. Nobody would have the kind of access she had to a top secret room where they kept the creature like she did. There were so many unbelievable moments to this film I was just rolling my eyes most of the time. I just couldn't let my common sense go and get into the love story. Disappointing.… Expand
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
5
charles19Oct 3, 2018
It is part musical, part science fiction, part melodrama, part artsy movie... and it doesn't really know what it finally wants to be. I love Sally Hawkins but I was disappointed with this film. It wanted to be artsy but sacrificed a certainIt is part musical, part science fiction, part melodrama, part artsy movie... and it doesn't really know what it finally wants to be. I love Sally Hawkins but I was disappointed with this film. It wanted to be artsy but sacrificed a certain authenticity. And please don't ever mix musical numbers with science fiction. That is beyond annoying.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
CirceApr 22, 2018
Beautiful cinematography, but stilted characters and utterly predictable, not terribly compelling story.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
5
ThylbanusMar 2, 2018
While this is by far Guillermo Del Toro's worst film, it still isn't bad overall by normal standards.

Visually it is typical Del Toro. It is engaging and charming. Clever use of framing, setting, even costumes shows a keen eye and clearWhile this is by far Guillermo Del Toro's worst film, it still isn't bad overall by normal standards.

Visually it is typical Del Toro. It is engaging and charming. Clever use of framing, setting, even costumes shows a keen eye and clear grasp of his craft. This is among his best visually.

Pacing is off, but typical of his work. If you know Del Toro, you come to expect it and just cope. If you are not familiar, his second act is always a the weak part of his films. Don't expect a lot here and you won't be disappointed.

Audio is complimentary, without distraction, though it is also not helping to drive it either. It is overall 'meh', but also not unusual for Del Toro. If you know him, this will also not phase you. Most others will not even notice.

Character development is not overly deep. The main couple is somewhat deep, but the antagonist is simply a parody. Normally the antagonists have depth and you find some level of sympathy with them, but not here. This is just a mockery, but one that is disconcerting as it mocks everything one should hold dear. I can't get into it without spoilers, but this is the most problematic part of this film.

Combined with the overall narrative, this is where the movie falls apart. How it could even be nominated for an Oscar is beyond me. If you have seen Hellboy, you are going to be overly familiar with the whole movie. If you aren't, don't worry because the foreshadowing is so clear that it smacks you in the face and calls you a loser. This is by far the worst story I've seen in some time. The fact that Del Toro wrote this just highlights the trend of directors shouldn't write their movies. From George Lucas to this, great writers will generally never make great directors, and vice versa. Somehow this D list horror/comedy movie in the vein of of "Saturday the 14th" and "Love at First Bite" is getting an Oscar nod just highlights how the industry has fallen.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
5
MurrayTJan 24, 2018
Great visually and great acting, which is great if you're interested in movie making. The story is a different story. It starts out good, but then gets more and more ridiculous until it gets to the point where I'm saying, "Seriously?"
9 of 12 users found this helpful93
All this user's reviews
5
OregonJayBirdMar 29, 2018
I have tried to reconcile my feelings about this film ever since the end credits began. By the time I'd walked into this film, my expectations were high. Not only was I already excited to see a new Del Toro film, being a somewhat "fan" ofI have tried to reconcile my feelings about this film ever since the end credits began. By the time I'd walked into this film, my expectations were high. Not only was I already excited to see a new Del Toro film, being a somewhat "fan" of much of his work, the movie had also garnered a lot of hype and praise. Now that the film is in my rearview mirror and steadily fading farther back, I can safely give my review.
While visually stunning and well acted, The Shape of Water came off as Abe Sapien playing The Creature from the Black Lagoon. There is no new tale to tell here. There is no fresh look at story telling. The Beauty and the Beast is over 200 years old, and there are any number of incarnations of it. And while the characters are well developed, each having their own quirks, they are poorly used support an unfortunately simple plot.
I'd wanted so much more from this film, such as a pace suitable for the plot drivers and a memorable scene or two just as Pan's Labyrinth had (which continues to call itself as a comparable film for Del Toro for me). Sadly I got neither. There were certainly moments, but no scene really stood out as a pinnacle force.
As it stands, The Shape of Water is good. Not great, just good. I'll simply have to wait for another art-house movie from Guillermo to be released and hope what will surely be my high expectations aren't dashed.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
SrPepeFeb 5, 2018
Un comienzo muy flojo desemboca en una trama muy rara. Buenas actuaciones, gran producción y buen entorno musical, pero no llego a entender que quiere transmitir la película. No me creo la relación y lo que menos me gusta son las pocasUn comienzo muy flojo desemboca en una trama muy rara. Buenas actuaciones, gran producción y buen entorno musical, pero no llego a entender que quiere transmitir la película. No me creo la relación y lo que menos me gusta son las pocas explicaciones, al final te quedas con más preguntas que respuestas.… Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
5
AproxxAug 19, 2018
Because this is as serious as a comic book movie.

And not the Nolan ones! This movie "works" in its themes (with some amazing visual storytelling, in particular one related to the fake happiness of the times and forced values on society andBecause this is as serious as a comic book movie.

And not the Nolan ones!

This movie "works" in its themes (with some amazing visual storytelling, in particular one related to the fake happiness of the times and forced values on society and family, and the part that the media had in exploting those concepts etc) and the scenes are well filmed. The fish is good I guess. And the pace its excellent.

Now. MY GOD! This movie is stupid ON PURPOSE. Because its a fantasy they get to create a world were everything is a charicature, and if this wins an Oscar, then exactly why not a comic book movie like Logan? Oscars suck (I knew it, but this movie just confirmed it).

There isn't a more subtle way to introduce sexual diversity than R rated Disney fantasy? The really great thing beyond cinematography and all those technical parts of filmmaking? Americans authorities are as bad as Russians authorities on this film.

That's ironic, because the rest of the characters (except our hero and Russian agent pro science) are as black and white as... again... a Disney movie (and not the better ones).

So yeah.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
EPMDJan 21, 2018
A human falls in love with a monster. I guess that can be a good movie if you really need to escape reality, but I just couldn't buy the premise. The sets are really well done, though. It's a professional movie, but the story is just not my thing.
8 of 10 users found this helpful82
All this user's reviews
5
Tom_BombadilMar 7, 2018
La película estaba bien mientras me encontraba mirando. Digo... consiguió mantenerme atento por dos horas, por lo menos. Pero una vez que terminó y comencé a pensar en lo que acababa de ver, me costaba recordar cosas que NO fueran mediocres.La película estaba bien mientras me encontraba mirando. Digo... consiguió mantenerme atento por dos horas, por lo menos. Pero una vez que terminó y comencé a pensar en lo que acababa de ver, me costaba recordar cosas que NO fueran mediocres. Del Toro tira y tira escenas en la cinta final y muchas de ellas no sirven para nada (en general todas las líneas argumentales secundarias son omitibles), y además se enfrasca en convenir un mensaje social que es demasiado indiscreto como para dejar pensando al espectador por sí mismo. El último acto es casi en su totalidad baratija hollywoodense: si tu trama requiere que todos lo personajes actúen como idiotas para que tu final tenga la más mínima gracia, entonces algo mal estás haciendo. Las líneas finales son cursilería digna de telenovela para adelescentes. Ignoren todo eso.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
TheFrogSep 11, 2019
I'm in the "disappointed" camp too. Guillermo Del Toro obviously despises everything that has to do with traditional values, and made a movie about it. The only three-dimensional characters are the outcasts, the misfits; everyone else isI'm in the "disappointed" camp too. Guillermo Del Toro obviously despises everything that has to do with traditional values, and made a movie about it. The only three-dimensional characters are the outcasts, the misfits; everyone else is evil, sanctimonius and plain stupid. I don't think this is what the USA in the 60s really were like, even though I have no way of knowing for sure, I see it more as a caricature, a summary of what was wrong cranked up to 11.
The movie suffers for it. The antagonist is despicable in every possible way, and this is especially a pity becasue I've always loved Del Toro's magnetic villains. Not just the superb, sad and poetic prince Nuada, after all that was a fantasy movie, but even the Francoist Colonel in Pan's Labyrinth was evil to the core - but also fearless and tougher than nails. The villain in this movie is not only evil, but also weak, clueless, stupid and ridiculed even in the way he pisses!
It's the caricature of a villain in a caricature of the USA, for a caricature of a Del Toro movie: unfortunately the director let his sensibilities get the better of his judgement. Definitely not worth a "Best Film" Oscar, IMHO.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
5
AppetipsDec 26, 2017
Lovely at times, and breathtakingly beautiful throughout, but very uneven in pacing and direction. I wanted it to be so much scarier in the scary parts, so much more romantic in the tender moments. Sally Hawkins is very, very good, andLovely at times, and breathtakingly beautiful throughout, but very uneven in pacing and direction. I wanted it to be so much scarier in the scary parts, so much more romantic in the tender moments. Sally Hawkins is very, very good, and Michael Shannon is fabulously menacing. I wanted more from the score too, as Alexandre Desplat usually creates more memorable music than this. Just one opinion, and I am definitely a del Toro fan, but I enjoyed Devils Backbone and Pans Labyrinth much more than this film.… Expand
4 of 6 users found this helpful42
All this user's reviews
5
DevlindJan 14, 2018
I really tried to like this movie, but in the end it was in vain. Of course, I'm no expert, but I trust in my good taste in story telling. As some people commented, finding things just for the sake to be original isn't really necessary toI really tried to like this movie, but in the end it was in vain. Of course, I'm no expert, but I trust in my good taste in story telling. As some people commented, finding things just for the sake to be original isn't really necessary to effectively tell a good story. This romantic version of "Free Willy" is just an example. Just to start, both the protagonist and the sidekick are an utter pain. They barely had any dimension, how are we as spectators supposed to feel invested in their goals like that? How can we root for them? The pacing is awkward and unnecessarily long. A lot of things are just there for plot convenience. Subplots are thrown into the mix only to be forgotten immediately without any consequence. Even with Alexandre Desplat, the music is forgetable. The ending is abrupt and we are left with a lot of stuff still hanging.

Of course, there's good stuff in the movie too. The acting was good (although a little unrealistic at times), Octavia's and Michael characters were enjoyable and the main plot (when we got that on screen) was on point and that's why this movie is just average to me. It does really good in one side, but what it does wrong, it does it really wrong (sometimes cringe worthy).

If you have an open mind and you just want to watch something without thinking about it too much and just drift with it, go ahead and give it a go. With any luck, you'll enjoy it or even like it. I tried and it was definitely an experience.


Not watching it again though.… Expand
9 of 11 users found this helpful92
All this user's reviews
5
Chaz23Mar 14, 2018
To start , Mr.Shannon was brilliant. His portrait of evil was excellent. The movie was well lit, well acted by each actor; however:
-The first 30 min. of the movie are not needed
-The last 40 min. were the best part of the movie - SterlingTo start , Mr.Shannon was brilliant. His portrait of evil was excellent. The movie was well lit, well acted by each actor; however:
-The first 30 min. of the movie are not needed
-The last 40 min. were the best part of the movie
- Sterling would have told the story within a 30 min. TV episode of the Twilight Zone
-Carter would have expanded the story to fit within an hour episode of the X Files… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
AscosporeMar 18, 2018
How did this film win the Academy award for best picture? Was it an inside joke by Del Toro; to include every genre he could think of and rip off Jeunet's unmistakable style - just to see if he could get away with it? How old and blind areHow did this film win the Academy award for best picture? Was it an inside joke by Del Toro; to include every genre he could think of and rip off Jeunet's unmistakable style - just to see if he could get away with it? How old and blind are these voting members? This is the most overrated film since Get Out.… Expand
3 of 3 users found this helpful30
All this user's reviews
5
NameOfAccountSep 9, 2018
Bland 'Beauty and the Beast'-type story that throws in every cliché in the book. Ham-fisted messages of treating the unknown with respect, while noble in theory, are really a thinly veiled excuse for del Toro to showcase his (admittedlyBland 'Beauty and the Beast'-type story that throws in every cliché in the book. Ham-fisted messages of treating the unknown with respect, while noble in theory, are really a thinly veiled excuse for del Toro to showcase his (admittedly innocuous) fish porn fantasies.

What we really found offensive was the gratuitous cat-head eating scene; it's these more gruesome fetishes we wish del Toro would dial down before he translates them to the big screen.

All in all, average at best.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
phillyjeffFeb 23, 2018
Probably one of the most boring movies I've ever seen. It's impossible to make a bathroom into a pool with sticking a towel under the door.
8 of 12 users found this helpful84
All this user's reviews
4
JNOTRFeb 6, 2018
It's a rare movie, that's why I find it difficult to analyze it. From the technical point of view it is excellent: cinematography, production design, makeup, soundtrack and the atmosphere of the 50's. But as for the script and theIt's a rare movie, that's why I find it difficult to analyze it. From the technical point of view it is excellent: cinematography, production design, makeup, soundtrack and the atmosphere of the 50's. But as for the script and the performances, I thought it was bad. The script, at first is too slow and takes time to establish the main plot, but at the end (in the last 15 minutes) everything is solved fast and forced. The only act that I came to like was that of Sally Hawkins; Octavia Spencer makes the same character that she always does, nothing special and Richard Jenkins too.
Personally I did not like it. I hope he does not take the Oscar for Best Movie.… Expand
10 of 13 users found this helpful103
All this user's reviews
4
LetMeInPleaseJan 26, 2018
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Technically competent movie with god tier music and good performances but to me it almost fell apart for one simple reason, I couldn't buy this love story at all. It sounds good on paper, two "freaks of nature" falling in love with each other, but its execution is so ridiculously contrived it sucks out all the potential enjoyment. Why such an advanced facility doesn't have cameras in the place it needs them the most? Why simple janitor can on her own easily access classified compartments of said facility and for what reason? Main heroine's motivation is really hard to swallow throughout the whole movie. It seems like it misses a good 20 minute chunk where the bonding between 2 lovers would be properly established.
Also on a side note, I understand that it's supposed to be like a fairy tale for adults, or whatever you wanna call it, but the main villain is such a one-note, so cartoonishly evil. Even for this format you gotta have more nuance than that… Expand
12 of 16 users found this helpful124
All this user's reviews
4
RidgeamordeJan 5, 2018
I'm sorry but this movie is just not as good as people would make it out to be. There were some good parts but overall I'd say it's too stupid, unrealistic, and just overall bad. I could already tell what was going to happen at the end beforeI'm sorry but this movie is just not as good as people would make it out to be. There were some good parts but overall I'd say it's too stupid, unrealistic, and just overall bad. I could already tell what was going to happen at the end before the movie hit the halfway mark. The actors, while skilled, were held back the the horrendous script that was completely irrational. Maybe I just don't get it or something, but it seems like it's trying too hard. I think it deserves a four. I would definitely not see it again.… Expand
10 of 15 users found this helpful105
All this user's reviews
4
FabrizioMaffeiSep 15, 2018
The ballad of the politically correct.
Guillermo del Toro has earned, thanks to beautiful films written and directed by him, popularity and a kind of veneration that doesn’t make easy to say that one of his films didn’t like with the risk ofThe ballad of the politically correct.
Guillermo del Toro has earned, thanks to beautiful films written and directed by him, popularity and a kind of veneration that doesn’t make easy to say that one of his films didn’t like with the risk of being attacked by a horde of zombie fans but I don’t care.
Photography, set design, costumes, all perfect, but what doesn’t work?
The story! One of the most trivial stories I could see, and I'm sorry that it was written by one of the directors I admired most (after I saw crimson peak).
As for “Phantom Thread”, the historical period in which the film is set (in this case the Cold War) serves only as a background to tell about characters that, despite a fantastic story, live our current problems.
There's the rub.
The characters are all great caricatures, created specifically for tear, smile and prizes.
There’s the protagonist that in a petty world, full of prejudices (like today), she cannot deal with anyone except with people on the margins of society like her., and the only relief valve that she has is masturbation, until she meet the monster; the gay painter out of time in everything he does; the black woman victim of everyone but who finally manages to rebel; the monster: something unknown, therefore an object, useful only for scientific study that can be applied in any way; the bad American agent who would do anything to get a promotion; the Russian scientist who, as he believes in science, is good; the bad Russians of course; the bad and bigoted American society.
And I want to ignore the obvious forcing in the script that I want to consider poetic licenses such as: the bad guy with the gangrenous hand standing like the predator, or the bathroom that fills with water without any problem, or the fact that it is very easy to enter in a classified place.
I should, as already said, let go many things concerning the script, but when I see characters written in this way my gears grinds.
I sincerely hope that despite this success Del Toro won’t touch "At the Mountains of Madness".
P.S. The monster. People said that it is a God. But what exactly does it do to look smarter (even if it takes less) than all the characters in the film?… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
JParisiDec 8, 2018
Liking this film depends on your ability to 'hear' the love story at its center. I didn't. If the artistry of the visuals was complemented by a better story and supporting cast it would have been better.
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
3
RealMuthaFMar 11, 2018
To be honest, the whole premise of a love story between a woman and some weird merman seemed unattractive to me to begin with, but the Oscars did their advertising job in the end. And my intuition did not fail, Shape of Water is boring,To be honest, the whole premise of a love story between a woman and some weird merman seemed unattractive to me to begin with, but the Oscars did their advertising job in the end. And my intuition did not fail, Shape of Water is boring, weird, and overly-sweet all at the same time.

To start with the good things - visually it's well-filmed and the 60's are stylishly presented. It's nothing ground-breaking, but overall solid. The second good aspect are the actors, everyone plays their roles convincingly. I would point out Michael Shannon in particular, he proved that he can be a great antagonist before, and he's done it again, I was actually rooting for his character throughout.

However, the story is a dull bizarre mess. To begin with, it is overwhelmingly unoriginal - the sheepish sugar-sweet lonely protagonist, the captive creature that is tortured instead of being communicated with, the army man antagonist. The movie is just a drag, and everything is as predictable as it can be.

Now I can buy the ancient overused trope about the protagonist empathizing to some captive intelligent creature, but explicitly having sex with it? And yeah, there's actually plenty of unnecessary nudity (Shannon shags his wife. Ok.) and allusions to the creature's penis. Well, whatever gets you that Oscar, I guess. I mean I'm no prune, but in my opinion nudity is justified when it helps to convey some point and flesh out the story. But this, this just looks like Del Toro's sick creepy sexual fantasies brought to life. Sorry, but my suspension of disbelief just doesn't cover the "woman gets turned on by slippery scaly aquatic monster" thing. What's your next move, Del Toro, a movie about furries?

To add to that, there's an absolutely redundant meaningless side plot about a gay old man failing to hook up with another guy, and couple of scenes dedicated to showing that Shannon's character has a sexual fetish for silence. That's when you thought this movie couldn' get any more creepy.

And since we're at it, I would really question how realistic it is that some random cleaners are allowed access to classified assets in a top-secret research facility. There's also an uncomfortably stereotypical black woman who overcompensates for the muteness of the main character, never managing to finally shut the hell up. Also at one point the movie has a musical number in it, like in some Disney flick. That was also the moment when my facepalm intensity peaked. Yeah, and isn't this merman's design very reminiscent of some sidekick of Hellboy in Del Toro's own movie? Pathetic.

So, as they say, best movie my ass. I've recently also watched "Three Billboards...", and it's miles ahead than this trash.… Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
3
ajukeoJan 31, 2018
As a massive fan of Guillermo Del Toro, I was eagerly looking forward to seeing another of his magical yet unusual creations with great characters and compelling story but that was not what I found.

From the unnecessary opening to theAs a massive fan of Guillermo Del Toro, I was eagerly looking forward to seeing another of his magical yet unusual creations with great characters and compelling story but that was not what I found.

From the unnecessary opening to the bizarre and out of place scenes, this movie felt like Del Toro just went with every first idea that came to his head and didn't think of where it would lead. Each scene was disjointed and the characters were not compelling in the slightest, I have never left the cinema so speechless in trying to describe what I had just witnessed.… Expand
13 of 20 users found this helpful137
All this user's reviews
3
ryecaMar 11, 2018
Not very good. Cliche story, boring, one-dimensional characters, cartoonish acting. Also, aren't we past the whole steam-punk, Bioshock aesthetic yet? Here is every Guillermo Del Toro movie that gets acclaim: Female protagonist faces typicalNot very good. Cliche story, boring, one-dimensional characters, cartoonish acting. Also, aren't we past the whole steam-punk, Bioshock aesthetic yet? Here is every Guillermo Del Toro movie that gets acclaim: Female protagonist faces typical evil in a fantasy world punctuated by moments of gore. Also, the attempts at humor are lame.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
3
AxeTJan 12, 2018
All of the season's fare is sickeningly over-rated by the critics herd to a level that's become ridiculous, and somehow this is even worse than expected and maybe less deserving than the rest in that absurd over-praise. There's no setup,All of the season's fare is sickeningly over-rated by the critics herd to a level that's become ridiculous, and somehow this is even worse than expected and maybe less deserving than the rest in that absurd over-praise. There's no setup, tone is wrong, music is wrong (that it's won some awards is just further proof) and most annoyingly the understood to be silly story is simply a strange foreign nerd's contrived excuse for childishly overt social sentiments instead of an actual thoughtful movie, and let me just say: I myself am a romantic and longtime monster movie fan!… Expand
12 of 22 users found this helpful1210
All this user's reviews
3
yosemiteJan 2, 2018
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This film is the standard bearer for inaccurate movie reviews. The artsy crafty Harvard Square crowd rate it 80-85 or 90 approval rating. Its the type of film making they dissected in college. As for the real world, it sucks ! Let me make a profitable movie. I'll start with a plain looking mute who supports herself scrubbing floors. Although she frequently masterbates, she has a heart of gold. She feels badly for a Black Lagoon look a like who is being held captive by the U.S. military. She arranges for the creature to escape. I could go on but its rubbish. If you want to drop $8-12 dollars and pretend you are an intellectual, go for it . Another choice is take that $$$ , but yourself a sub sandwich and watch the Breaking Bad marathon on AMC… Expand
12 of 21 users found this helpful129
All this user's reviews
3
JudMar 23, 2018
This movie has a magical opening that made me want to believe in it so much but then it constantly assaults us with ridiculous plot twists and characterizations that I just couldn't relate to or believe, mo matter how much I wanted to. ThisThis movie has a magical opening that made me want to believe in it so much but then it constantly assaults us with ridiculous plot twists and characterizations that I just couldn't relate to or believe, mo matter how much I wanted to. This is not a Best Picture, not even close. No wonder more and more people are panning the Academy Awards each year.… Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
3
AkumaJackFeb 14, 2018
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Elisa have sex with a fish.
She has sex with a fish. That's disgusting. That overshadows everything else. Disgusting and gross.… Expand
8 of 11 users found this helpful83
All this user's reviews
3
GittoploFeb 7, 2018
Poor script, rubbish plot bad actors and poor acting. Boring, lacklustre, insipid and on and on. I am surprised Mark Kermode liked it. In the same category as Get Out - absolute modern day rubbish.

For true cinema lovers, I stronglyPoor script, rubbish plot bad actors and poor acting. Boring, lacklustre, insipid and on and on. I am surprised Mark Kermode liked it. In the same category as Get Out - absolute modern day rubbish.

For true cinema lovers, I strongly recommend the following hidden gem: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0055844/?ref_=nv_sr_1

Watch and compare. Taste the difference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cf5HA6GIJQI… Expand
10 of 13 users found this helpful103
All this user's reviews
Page:
More From This Movie

87 Critic Reviews

7.0 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 77 Project Hail Mary
2 75 Send Help
3 73 Hoppers
4 72 The Sheep Detectives
5 63 Normal
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL