Once Upon a Time ... in Hollywood

10

pablo_delReyAug 5, 2019

I love it. Just perfect.

2 of 12 users found this helpful210

All this user's reviews

8

mvrtsAug 5, 2019

Not as good as the media says, not as bad as some people say. It's one of those movies you have to sit down and appreciate the filmmaking cinematography and acting aspect of. The plot is free flowing rather than established clearly at anyNot as good as the media says, not as bad as some people say. It's one of those movies you have to sit down and appreciate the filmmaking cinematography and acting aspect of. The plot is free flowing rather than established clearly at any point in the movie. If you enjoyed Wolf of Wall Street I would put this right next to it if not below… Expand

0 of 10 users found this helpful010

All this user's reviews

0

keigbosicAug 4, 2019

This is my number 1 on my list of worst movies. all these people on here talking about how good the movie is are stupid. The entire movie except for the last 20 minutes are horrible. Almost 2 hours of the total movie time have nothing to doThis is my number 1 on my list of worst movies. all these people on here talking about how good the movie is are stupid. The entire movie except for the last 20 minutes are horrible. Almost 2 hours of the total movie time have nothing to do with the end of the movie. Leonardo's character did nothing for the film except his acting in real life. Thankyou and have a good day.… Expand

13 of 34 users found this helpful1321

All this user's reviews

2

HeretojudgeAug 4, 2019

Weird and boring. First 2 hours and 30 minutes you’re watching Brad Pit drive around and Leonardo acting in old movies. Last 15 minutes provide a little comedy and action. The end

13 of 33 users found this helpful1320

All this user's reviews

10

CrimsonFlushAug 4, 2019

If you're not into late 60s pop culture or music and know nothing or care about that history you should probably skip this one, it'll bore you. This is nothing like Tarantino's last two violent, revenge, blood-fests Django and Inglorius. IfIf you're not into late 60s pop culture or music and know nothing or care about that history you should probably skip this one, it'll bore you. This is nothing like Tarantino's last two violent, revenge, blood-fests Django and Inglorius. If you expect this, look elsewhere. If though, you enjoy quirky humor like The Big Lebowski, you'll enjoy this movie. I'm not saying it's Lebowski, but it's probably as close as you'll find.… Expand

2 of 13 users found this helpful211

All this user's reviews

3

CriticonAug 4, 2019

Boring as hell. The only reason you keep watching this movie is on the hopes it will pull a full 180 at some pount. When it does, it feels completely out of place. I wish I could get my money back. This movie sucks!

13 of 33 users found this helpful1320

All this user's reviews

10

manningn15Jul 31, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The lead performances from Leonardo DiCaprio and Brad Pitt were phenomenal and hilarious. The supporting ensemble cast were stupendous especially Julia Butters, Dakota Fanning, Bruce Dern, Margaret Qualley, Austin Butler, Kurt Russell, Mike Moh, Margot Robbie, Al Pacino, Zoe Bell, Mikey Madison, Lorenza Izzo, Timothy Olyphant, and Luke Perry. The screenplay was remarkably well-written and hilarious. The costumes were outstanding especially the ones that Leonardo DiCaprio, Brad Pitt, Margot Robbie, and Julia Butters wore and all of the old west costumes. The hairstyling and makeup were excellent especially on Leonardo DiCaprio, Brad Pitt, Dakota Fanning, Margot Robbie, Austin Butler, Mike Moh, Timothy Olyphant, and Luke Perry. The cinematography was magnificent. I loved the 60s scenery it was terrific and I loved all of the sets they were all really cool looking. The fight scene at the end between Cliff Booth and Brandy against Tex, Susan, and Patricia was awesome. Once Upon A Time In... Hollywood is a A+ movie and is my 2nd favorite comedy of 2019, one of my top 5 favorite dramas of 2019, one of my favorite movies of 2019, and one of my favorite movies of all time.… Expand

2 of 11 users found this helpful29

All this user's reviews

0

Chocapic360Aug 4, 2019

It's soooooooooooooooooooo long and boring in 2:40h I laughed twice and I wanted to die for most of the movie.

12 of 33 users found this helpful1221

All this user's reviews

7

jimmieb45Aug 4, 2019

Set in late 60′s California, Quentin Tarantino’s most recent picture “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood” places audiences in a slow starting and fast finishing wholistic two hour film.

A piece created for its time the movie matches washed up hasSet in late 60′s California, Quentin Tarantino’s most recent picture “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood” places audiences in a slow starting and fast finishing wholistic two hour film.

A piece created for its time the movie matches washed up has beens and ambitious wannabe’s in a time where the world around them is becoming less about that “golden” Hollywood lifestyle.

Tarantino’s unique directing style shines through with long drawn out simple scenes and conversation dialogue that actually feels like something two people would be talking about in ways that two people might actually be talking to each other. Like most conversations in passing, some may not be as particularly interesting as others, but throughout the film this adds a much needed layer of realism to a time period that is normally sensationalized at every instance in its reflection of cinema. Additionally the story is relatively straightforward due to the assist of its alignment with the terrible Manson family event that happened that fateful day in 1969.

For personal enjoyment I was left pleased when the film was over that my captivation in the moment was not lost or interrupted by anything a character on screen did. Actions felt warranted and words felt real in what is a testament to both the actor and Tarantino’s writing himself.

While falling short of his previous greats like “Hateful Eight” and “Inglourious Basterds”, “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood” successfully evokes nostalgic emotion and provides genuine entertainment in a realistic and exciting thoughtful slice of life.

-

Jim Score: 7.3/10… Expand

0 of 5 users found this helpful05

All this user's reviews

7

dafragstaAug 4, 2019

I am a huge Tarantino fan and I don't begrudge him for trying to make a movie that doesn't take you for a non-stop rollercoaster ride like Django, Kill Bill, or Hateful Eight and does try to subvert your expectations a bit. That said, this isI am a huge Tarantino fan and I don't begrudge him for trying to make a movie that doesn't take you for a non-stop rollercoaster ride like Django, Kill Bill, or Hateful Eight and does try to subvert your expectations a bit. That said, this is probably heavier on the character development and lighter on the actual typical story arch, but this movie seemed to lack the signature cool vibes of a Tarantino movie while having pretty much all the coolest people in Hollywood, set in one of the coolest points in history, with a pretty typical cool Tarantino soundtrack.

What I mean is that there aren't as many immediately catchy bits of dialog you commit to memory and become part of your vernacular. There also doesn't seem to be as tight of a story as there usually is in a Tarantino movie. This is more like Tarantino's Inherent Vice or Slacker. Both are good movies that just never really settle into a groove that feels like it fits on a subconscious level. It feels like the events of a few days followed by a few montages to pass the time of 6 months in the middle and you always feel like you're at the beginning of a story that doesn't quite go where you think it will or really pull you in. It's almost like Tarantino deliberately tried to subvert your expectations but doesn't replace them with something better. They just get replaced with something.

Visually, it's spot on. All the classic cars, the crazy driving away from Rick Dalton and Roman Polanski's house, down the switchback road with the hairpin turn. The downtown Hollywood scenes, the look of the mock TV shows, all of the visual aspects of the movie are perfect. That said, I think this is like Jackie Brown in standing alone as a slightly different feeling Tarantino movie. It's not as dry as Jackie Brown, but it feels more sedated in the ways that Jackie Brown does. It seems to explore themes of getting older in the ways Jackie Brown does. The violence, while definitely there, seems a little more turned down throughout the movie like it is in Jackie Brown.… Expand

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

5

warfieldAug 4, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Of all the Tarentine movies that I have seen, the least inspired. Weak narrative. Weak character development. And he had already used the alternative history device in the great "Inglorious Basterds." And enough with his foot-fetish fantasies... I get it! I was really looking forward to this movie: a great disappointment… Expand

3 of 9 users found this helpful36

All this user's reviews

0

raporgiJul 27, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. foook the shill reviews. this movie is a complete waste of time.its plotless drivel capped by some violence at the end. QT needs to stfu and retire.

Leo beeches about his lame career while Brad Pitt kicks Bruce Lee's ass and tries to talk to an old man. It ends with them beating the crap out of some Manson minions. Margot Robbie just wanders around on screen with no real impact on the movie. Some fools will say this is about the cinematography and a bygone era in Hollywood, its not. Its about a self-important retard named Quentin Tarantino taking a shiitt in a pale and having hordes of his nerd club congregate on sites like this defending this fail of a movie. Dont be a member of the sheep. DId you really enjoy your time with this movie. DId it entertain you? Did it make you feel you got your money's worth? Or did you feel robbed and exploited by the Hollywood hype machine making this movie out to be the golden fleece?… Expand

26 of 67 users found this helpful2641

All this user's reviews

8

UncleWillardAug 3, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I was psyched to see this movie and it did not disappoint, but it did surprise. I expected a slice of life love letter to Hollywood's heyday as it ends in the persona of Rick, and I got that, but so much more. A Hollywood movie about Hollywood movies filmed like a Hollywood movie, if that makes sense, which it should, given there are some great DiCaprio scenes acting about acting. It's also Hollywood in that, as many movies do, even ones about real people and events, it romanticizes its subject more than it depicts the reality. It gives true stories happy endings, and that's what we get here. The boogeyman of Manson is defeated, and not by some mythical hero, but by an actor and is stuntman sidekick; true denizens of Hollywood. We're spared the tragedy of the end of that era by allowing those taken from us to live on in this Hollywood version of Hollywood, where the good guys win.… Expand

2 of 12 users found this helpful210

All this user's reviews

9

Jman98Aug 3, 2019

Not Tarantino's best work for sure, but still a masterfully directed, surprisingly hilarious movie. Even with not much of plot happening through most of the movie, it remains entertaining as all hell as you follow Leo DiCaprio and Brad Pitt'sNot Tarantino's best work for sure, but still a masterfully directed, surprisingly hilarious movie. Even with not much of plot happening through most of the movie, it remains entertaining as all hell as you follow Leo DiCaprio and Brad Pitt's chatacters through 1969's Hollywood. The 2 hr 45 min runtime flew by with an incredible sastisfying ending.… Expand

2 of 10 users found this helpful28

All this user's reviews

8

ahmedaiman1999Aug 3, 2019

While The Hateful Eight is neither Tarantino's finest, nor is it my favourite film by him, it's undeniably his most mature. This one is pretty much the exact opposite. Once Upon a Time ... in Hollywood is wild, a bit rough around the edgesWhile The Hateful Eight is neither Tarantino's finest, nor is it my favourite film by him, it's undeniably his most mature. This one is pretty much the exact opposite. Once Upon a Time ... in Hollywood is wild, a bit rough around the edges and choppy (especially at its second act) and unrestrained to a fault. It also may be his most self-indulgent film to date. Nevertheless, all that is in a most engrossing and enthralling way... for the most part.

Quentin Tarantino is one of my top 5 favourite film directors. Add to that a star-studded cast, most notably Brad Pitt, Al Pacino, Margot Robbie and Leonardo DiCaprio (who's one of, if not my favourite actor of all-time). So there's no need to say how much I was exciting to see his latest film. Honestly, this was my most anticipated upcoming film in general. And I enjoyed it... I liked it... I loved it, but that doesn't mean I found it underwhelming!

Tarantino had to capture the zeitgeist of the 60s, and he did. But he didn't stop here. He made a late 60s, or an early 70s, film through and through. Regardless of its advanced technical aspect, this film let us see how a Tarantino film would be like if he made films in the sixties (although I'm positive he would have made a more violent film). Unlike other Tarantino films, this one's plot unfolds in an unbound and kinda spontaneous manner. And I like these kind of films so much. Of course the music and the production design are spot-on, but Tarantino's outstandingly excellent grasp of the time period has surpassed all that.

For what I've said above, complaining about the film's unfocused storytelling is both contradictory and unjust. Besides, Tarantino's films have never been straightforwardly narrated (The thing I adore). What bothered me is that in this film I felt, for the first time in a Tarantino film, that there are many unnecessary and (I hate to say it) pointless. These oddly intriguing scenes that contain dialogue which has nothing to do with the story yet still madly riveting are not as tasteful as usual. The reasons behind that, I assume, are that: the dialogue doesn't feel as refreshing or daring as in the other Tarantino films, and the scenes in themselves aren't very well-put together or well-combined. I'm not sure why I felt that (talking about the later reason), but maybe it's the editing or maybe it's because these scenes needed to be more longer to earn its weight.

The humour also isn't the cunningly witty humour Tarantino is known for, but it still works fairly well nonetheless. The film is also not as violent and brutal as other Tarantino films, but boy the climactic scene! This is not to say Once Upon a Time ... in Hollywood is less engaging than Tarantino's other efforts. Don't worry, my eyes were glued to the screen as they always do while watching any of this brilliant filmmaker's films! What makes this film stand out among the rest of the films in Tarantino's filmography (besides the distinctive way its plot unfolds in) is that this one is undisputedly gentler and actually kinda warm!

Talking about the acting is really unnecessary, but I guess I have to. First and Foremost, Leo and Brad Pitt have a remarkable chemistry that's definitely one of the best I've ever had the pleasure to see in any film. As for each one of them alone, they are both at their peak, but I can't say these are their best performances. I'm not that familiar with Sharon Tate. But for what I know about her style and her manner of speaking, I can say that Margot Robbie nailed it. She is fantastically energetic and innocently charming. It's definitely one of her best supporting performances. Al Pacino doesn't have much screen time, but I enjoyed seeing him. Both Margaret Qualley, who played **** and Julia Butters, who played the little girl, Trudi, are scene-stealers. I think both of them have very promising careers. I also liked the Stranger Things breakout star, Maya Hawk, despite appearing in very, very few scenes.

I need to watch it one more time to decide whether it's my least favourite Tarantino or not, but, overall, Once Upon a Time ... in Hollywood is a blast from start to finish that kept me on the edge of my seat all throughout. Its 161-min runtime just flew by. I mean, it's a Tarantino film at the end of the day!

(8/10)… Expand

3 of 11 users found this helpful38

All this user's reviews

2

NrthGeorgiaMikeAug 3, 2019

I'm just shocked that a QT movie could move so SLOW. I couldn't tell where this movie was headed for most of it, and I'm still not sure what the real plot line actually was. My advice to anyone considering a watch is to pay attention to theI'm just shocked that a QT movie could move so SLOW. I couldn't tell where this movie was headed for most of it, and I'm still not sure what the real plot line actually was. My advice to anyone considering a watch is to pay attention to the negative reviews... and ignore all the 10 ratings from QT fanboys. I've truly enjoyed his other movies, PF, KB, RD, H8 and the rest- and really looked forward to this one. Except for the final 20 minute signature gore and "weirdness" action, this was a boring snoozefest. Pitt and Leo are very good actors (Robbie not so much, but nice to look at), but the "dog" ended up being the character I enjoyed most. >;-)… Expand

12 of 31 users found this helpful1219

All this user's reviews

4

shoulderoforionAug 3, 2019

Not what I expect from a Tarantino flick, but after the awful and drawn out Hateful Eight I don't know why I have any expectations any longer, anyways. OUATH is mostly boring, it's beautiful for sure, the detail of 60's LA painstakinglyNot what I expect from a Tarantino flick, but after the awful and drawn out Hateful Eight I don't know why I have any expectations any longer, anyways. OUATH is mostly boring, it's beautiful for sure, the detail of 60's LA painstakingly brought back to life, minutia of the television/film studio system explained for anyone who came to a QT film for that, but the action is limited to two very quick scenes and as a whole the movie is mostly a let down. Lot's of atmosphere, very little story. Make critics cream themselves, but for fans of Tarantino rough and tumble, grit and action, there's no there, here.… Expand

11 of 29 users found this helpful1118

All this user's reviews

10

VodkashotsAug 3, 2019

Another amazing achievement from Quentin Tarantino. Don't go in expecting Pulp Fiction, just sit back and take in all the glorious details and interesting characters. This movie begs to be seen twice.

2 of 10 users found this helpful28

All this user's reviews

3

Dexter65Aug 2, 2019

The performances from Leonardo DiCaprio and Brad Pitt somewhat redeem this movie. It reminds me of Hal Needham getting together with his buddies and making a movie. It has great attention to detail of the period but unfortunately does notThe performances from Leonardo DiCaprio and Brad Pitt somewhat redeem this movie. It reminds me of Hal Needham getting together with his buddies and making a movie. It has great attention to detail of the period but unfortunately does not have attention to detail when being edited. It is too long and much of it is pointless. QT’s self indulgence is hard to watch. In my mind if I look at my watch during a movie it has failed. I looked at my watch 4 times. I won’t be seeing film #10.… Expand

13 of 33 users found this helpful1320

All this user's reviews

9

TrillcosbeyAug 2, 2019

Original content, Original content, Original content, This film is a lackadaisical trip though a fantasy world about a major fulcrum point in Hollywood and Los Angeles that was a loss of innocence that was needed to grow up and face realityOriginal content, Original content, Original content, This film is a lackadaisical trip though a fantasy world about a major fulcrum point in Hollywood and Los Angeles that was a loss of innocence that was needed to grow up and face reality but also plays this all out in a buddy film.… Expand

2 of 11 users found this helpful29

All this user's reviews

3

RoguewarAug 2, 2019

Loved Django Unchained. This movie was lacking a lot. An hour in, I was still trying to figure out if there was any sort of plot or storyline. If your under 40 and not a Hollywood trivia buff you probably won't understand a lot of theLoved Django Unchained. This movie was lacking a lot. An hour in, I was still trying to figure out if there was any sort of plot or storyline. If your under 40 and not a Hollywood trivia buff you probably won't understand a lot of the references. My son and his friends (all collage students) saw it and said it was okay. When my wife asked them what it was about, they said they had no idea. My wife almost didn't want to see it because she hates violent movies, but other than about 5 minutes towards the end there is almost no violence in the entire movie. The cast was the only thing that even kept it watchable.… Expand

11 of 30 users found this helpful1119

All this user's reviews

10

Scolenn22Aug 2, 2019

I was glued. 10 out of 10. I am truly amazed that some viewers do not like this masterpiece. The pace may be a little slow for some who are used to instant gratification (See Marvel/DC et al.) but to me it was perfect. It's mind bogglingI was glued. 10 out of 10. I am truly amazed that some viewers do not like this masterpiece. The pace may be a little slow for some who are used to instant gratification (See Marvel/DC et al.) but to me it was perfect. It's mind boggling that the 15th edition of Spider Boy gets higher ratings than this original work of art. Maybe people are watching QT's latest on their iPhones? Go out to a big screen people!… Expand

2 of 10 users found this helpful28

All this user's reviews

9

JPKAug 1, 2019

Very Entertaining
Once Upon A Time In Hollywood is terrifically acted, well written, and hilarious.

3 of 11 users found this helpful38

All this user's reviews

7

TrevorsViewAug 1, 2019

Years ago, a video rental store worker decided from hours of watching VHS tapes that he wanted to build upon those old movies using his own original movies. Eventually, he wrote and directed a freshman hit, Reservoir Dogs… then two yearsYears ago, a video rental store worker decided from hours of watching VHS tapes that he wanted to build upon those old movies using his own original movies. Eventually, he wrote and directed a freshman hit, Reservoir Dogs… then two years later, his tribute to older cinema trends, Pulp Fiction, struck Oscar gold. Now, Quentin Tarantino’s tenth feature film celebrates the new using old fashioned cowboys and gunfire; it’s… Once Upon a Time… in Hollywood.

First off, Leonardo DiCaprio nails it as a famous TV star who may soon hit dusk point, his tears that stutter between a rough, tough speech could help him achieve a second Oscar win come February! Women in the audience will particularly love Margot Robbie’s portrayal of Sharon Tate, especially when she gets jiggy while listening to her movie’s soundtrack before the mezzanine lights go out. Robbie is just one of the expert actors here who knows how to tell a story through the eyes! Beautiful, loud fashions also explode in a whole party right beside Playboy Mansion’s waterfall pool as the slutty hippies outside are seen hitchhiking on the street! Wow! What a recreation of 1969!

Although here, Tarantino’s biggest filmography problem blares louder than ever before: the movie is too long for its own good. It doesn’t help that the otherwise masterful screenplay must juggle three different subplots. One revolves around the protagonist’s Western TV show, one revolves around his stunt double, and one revolves around Sharon Tate watching herself onscreen. Too many minutes pass between these stories to care, and too much of it goes to the least interesting one of all: that of the stunt double. Continuing the immoral behavior that drags this movie down, there is included for no real reason a presumedly mandatory shot of Brad Pitt shirtless, which disrupts the tone established a couple scenes before by the wonderful usage of the song, “Mrs. Robinson.”

Yet this movie gets some critical concepts about actors correct, including the fact that actors should stop accepting roles to merely sustain their public images. It happens all the time today: Brie Larson undid her talent by playing Captain Marvel, and Michael Keaton did likewise with his fake Dumbo accent. This screenplay’s interweaving stories about stories remind the filmmaking industry that fame is unimportant, but rather- what message to communicate to followers is what’s important. Right now, such humans are being turned into ads with the power of Photoshop, autotuning, and million-dollar makeup jobs to draw followers onto their pedestal.

That reality of the acting business is made transparent by the presence of a young girl who behaves with the professionalism of an adult, while an eighteen-year-old hippie kicks a couple of bare dirty feet all around like a child does. It’s not Kim Kardashian who deserves respect for letting her face get plastered onto every ad, billboard, and magazine cover in sight, but these background actresses who play the hippies in this movie, as they clearly worked well together! Actors such as these really know how to bring out their vulnerability to total strangers!

In creative efforts to help these actors do so well, Quentin Tarantino possesses an incredible superpower behind his typewriter… each word written has many layers of depth to express his colorful characters. Each one is realistic yet an exaggerated stereotype, while their conversations sound natural yet require multiple viewings to appreciate. As for the way he crafts violence, it’s approached a little different here, the borderline NC-17 content remains held back until the climax. Then the satisfying bloodbaths hit in overtly insane ways with the promised shock value, landing on the perfect ending note to complete the film’s perfect starting note.

That’s the cunning power of Quentin Tarantino’s works: At first viewing, you may think, “Ugh, enough talking, I just want to watch these foul-mouthed losers get their heads blown off!” Then from the long runtime, all you remember is one or two graphic moments, which compels a desire for watch-round number two. But then, you somehow end up watching not for a Texan who carves a swastika onto a Nazi’s forehead, you instead watch for the detail present in the lengthy conversations… you would never guess that Jews and Germans have different ways to hold up three fingers! Case in point, the more frequently I watched Pulp Fiction, the more I could let go of any shock value from its foul content, and the more I caught on to its deeper themes about dangerous pop culture pride, and even took it a step further by writing a blog entry about how it aligns to Christianity.

That same type of energy enlightens Once Upon a Time… in Hollywood.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

10

stevegroundhogAug 1, 2019

Awesome plot, awesome dialogue! Love the way Tarantino showed us the way hollywood was and should be. Side note, that's the way most hippies should go. ;)

2 of 10 users found this helpful28

All this user's reviews

1

favor4afavorAug 1, 2019

I love Tarantino, but this film was painfully slow and the payoff at the end of 3 hours was simply not worth it

24 of 54 users found this helpful2430

All this user's reviews

9

DemonShadow00Aug 1, 2019

One of Tarantinos best.. Fun.. Hilarious.. And absolutely creative! Leo and Brad Pitt were tremendous together and the rest of the cast did there part

3 of 10 users found this helpful37

All this user's reviews

4

yosemiteAug 1, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Lets try to compare the classic Pulp Fiction to this film. QT follows a lose formula. To begin, all the actors in this movie are good. In Pulp , much of the story revolved around Vince Vega and Jules. In this one, Rick and Cliff are the principles. Loose comparison between Sharon Tate and Mia in Pulp but he gave Uma's character much better lines. Robby looks like Tate but thats where it ends. The Manson family sort of a collection of Marcellus Wallace parts. Bad guys but interesting and then of course, Tarantino's famous cameo roles. With Bruce Willis' Butch, Christopher Walken, Harvey Kietel, Eric Stolze, he hit the mother lode. Pacino, Damian Lewis , Bruce Dern, Kurt Russell's characters not even close. In conclusion. I think he got lucky with Pulp Fiction. Its a top 50 all time movie. One upon a Time in Hollywood is a mess and more indicative of Tarantino's true talent as a director. I alway like DiCaprio but in the this film, I thought Brad stole the show… Expand

12 of 35 users found this helpful1223

All this user's reviews

10

Thenightwing35Aug 1, 2019

Very well paced, even though second half was real slow. It turns into a hangout movie, but I love that kind of thing. Great performances from Brad and Leo, Robbie needed a bit more, but she was good when she was there. Bruce Lee is hated tooVery well paced, even though second half was real slow. It turns into a hangout movie, but I love that kind of thing. Great performances from Brad and Leo, Robbie needed a bit more, but she was good when she was there. Bruce Lee is hated too much, but you have to face the fact that it's a fairytale. Definitely do not miss this one!… Expand

2 of 10 users found this helpful28

All this user's reviews

5

SandyjaffeAug 1, 2019

Good reproduction of era, Brad Pitt is gorgeous otherwise shallow and boring. Not worth the time and money.

5 of 12 users found this helpful57

All this user's reviews

7

GinaKJul 31, 2019

An interesting film with a great cast and one major fault – it is too long, regardless of how appealing the actors are. Many with far less screen time (for example, Margo Robbie) were far more interesting to watch. And this wasn’t a fairyAn interesting film with a great cast and one major fault – it is too long, regardless of how appealing the actors are. Many with far less screen time (for example, Margo Robbie) were far more interesting to watch. And this wasn’t a fairy tale (“once upon a time”) and doesn’t even really qualify as a tragedy, a least in the classic sense. Things just happened. By mixing fiction and reality, Tarantino made me expect something more insightful instead of simply a re-telling of real events with exceptionally good actors.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

8

mixoticJul 31, 2019

I really enjoyed this ride through 1969 Hollywood. This is a love letter to film and entertainment from a different era, with all the over acting and jump cuts one one would expect to see. I found myself laughing out loud many many times, andI really enjoyed this ride through 1969 Hollywood. This is a love letter to film and entertainment from a different era, with all the over acting and jump cuts one one would expect to see. I found myself laughing out loud many many times, and the acting is of course delightful. The buddy-buddy relationship between DiCaprio and Pitt is both adorable and heartbreaking. I found the pacing to be excellent for a movie that's 2:45 long (although I did need a quick bathroom break!). It's amazing how many quintessential Tarantino moments there are to take in, while not being over the top (dare I say absurd?) in the way that Django or Kill Bill are. An amazing look at a classic era in America, through a very specific lens.… Expand

8 of 17 users found this helpful89

All this user's reviews

6

frankiep86Jul 31, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I wanted to love it - went in expecting to love it. But in the end, it felt half-baked. This tongue-in-cheek imagining of late 60's Hollywood was fun at times, interesting at points, but all in all comes up short. Tarantino puts his signature dialogue and humour to good use but there is no tension - even when there could be tension it adds up to not much. The performances were solid, if not a bit overworked in trying to be appealing. The twist on the Manson plot line felt on the verge of disrespectful to a horrific crime. I am a big Tarantino fan but this was a miss in my book.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

6

jimmypowderJul 31, 2019

I'll give this a C+ ,certainly not at the Pulp Fiction level,which is a classic . My 28 year old son hated it. The acting alone by Brad Pitt redeems the movie enough to give it a C+ .More Manson intertwined with Hollywood would have made thisI'll give this a C+ ,certainly not at the Pulp Fiction level,which is a classic . My 28 year old son hated it. The acting alone by Brad Pitt redeems the movie enough to give it a C+ .More Manson intertwined with Hollywood would have made this a better movie. Too much nostalgia over the westerns ,which i happen to like, made 3/4's of the movie slow and tiresome.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

8

moviewatcherclbJul 31, 2019

It's a slow paced, dialogue rich, collection of fantastic scenes, with top-notch storytelling, performed by outstanding actors, with great cinematography and good directing. How is this movie not awesome? Check out my video here -It's a slow paced, dialogue rich, collection of fantastic scenes, with top-notch storytelling, performed by outstanding actors, with great cinematography and good directing. How is this movie not awesome? Check out my video here - https://youtu.be/vD1O_aEbcrM… Expand

5 of 14 users found this helpful59

All this user's reviews

5

DrBlahBlahJul 30, 2019

What an indulgent, ridiculous, boring mess. Is it just me, or has each Tarantino film since Pulp Fiction been worse than the last?

9 of 26 users found this helpful917

All this user's reviews

1

RodMagnusonJul 30, 2019

Sets that transport the audience back in time. ++
An interesting buddy relationship. +
Long periods where not much is happening. -- A little ultra violence. -- I can't think of anyone I would recommend this movie to. I was bamboozled intoSets that transport the audience back in time. ++
An interesting buddy relationship. +
Long periods where not much is happening. --
A little ultra violence. --

I can't think of anyone I would recommend this movie to. I was bamboozled into seeing it myself. I've learned my lesson, I don't like Tarantino films.… Expand

18 of 49 users found this helpful1831

All this user's reviews

9

MovieTurtleJul 30, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. A surprising fascinating movie that went beyond my expectations.
I happened into seeing it when I heard a local theater was doing 35mm showings and decided to grab a drink swing over and watch it. I hadn't originally planned to see it since the trailer looked middling, but I'm glad I did.

The movie is a slow burn that culminates in a dramatic high point of an ending.
It kind of surprised me that even with all the hints I really didn't get that this was a historical fiction until after the movie ended. An excellent addition to QT's works.… Expand

4 of 15 users found this helpful411

All this user's reviews

9

CrazyStupidJakeJul 30, 2019

So much fun. Two incredible lead performances and easily Tarantino’s funniest script. It’s his least story-driven film, which is a refreshing departure. I feel like he was trying to capture this really specific time and place for the filmSo much fun. Two incredible lead performances and easily Tarantino’s funniest script. It’s his least story-driven film, which is a refreshing departure. I feel like he was trying to capture this really specific time and place for the film industry and I loved just being able to live in that for awhile with these awesome characters. There’s a reason why so much of the film is spent just hanging out with these people as they drive around L.A. or watch television together. The 1969 style and tone remain consistently hazy and aimless in the best possible way. That being said, it probably ranks 7th for me, out of his 9 amazing films.… Expand

4 of 14 users found this helpful410

All this user's reviews

6

SergeantSozJul 30, 2019

I’m a big fan of Tarantino but this one was just okay. It ranks towards the bottom of his portfolio but since this is about Hollywood, Hollywood critics will eat that sh** up. Same as La La Land. Usually the user scores are higher than theI’m a big fan of Tarantino but this one was just okay. It ranks towards the bottom of his portfolio but since this is about Hollywood, Hollywood critics will eat that sh** up. Same as La La Land. Usually the user scores are higher than the critic rating but this time it’s the opposite and that says something. I went in expecting more I guess. It just didn’t seem to have any story at all and no development or explanation of anything, just about 3 hours of nostalgia trip. People who lived in that era will probably love this film more than I did but at the end I was like - that’s it? It’s a well-made, well acted movie but most Tarantino films have amazing dialogue scenes that this film lacked. It was mostly just montages of old 60s style movies and TV shows. Overall it was funny and the cast was terrific. I’d recommend seeing it but it won’t blow your mind or anything. it’s… Expand

6 of 20 users found this helpful614

All this user's reviews

0

MclmclmclJul 30, 2019

I can't remember ever walking out of a movie....talk about boring....after alost 2 hours of hoping things would get better i walked out...

21 of 54 users found this helpful2133

All this user's reviews

1

RobynRossJul 30, 2019

This indulgence fest of a movie was like watching a whole bunch of Hollywood friends, get together for a circle jerk. Definitely on my "one of the worst movies I've ever seen" list. Gluttonous and self indulgent to the max. Seriously, did IThis indulgence fest of a movie was like watching a whole bunch of Hollywood friends, get together for a circle jerk. Definitely on my "one of the worst movies I've ever seen" list. Gluttonous and self indulgent to the max. Seriously, did I need to see the dog food slide out of the can and plop into the bowl every time Brad Pitt's character fed his damn dog? Or watch every clip Leo's character, the actor, played? (Maybe that's why it was nearly three hours long. It was like watching this movie and then "Rick Dalton's" movies. A crappy BOGO deal. Where in the world was the editor? An hour could have been deleted from this film and it would still be about nothing! Ridiculously over acted by all of the leads (excluding Margot Robbie but she was mostly just used as a prop anyway) and all were 2 dimensional cliched characters (or shall I say caricatures?). My friend and I were tempted to walk out but stayed in hopes there was a pay off. There was absolutely none. In fact the ending was just all together stupid. But if you love Tarantino camp, gore and violence, you do at least get that pay off I guess. I did give this movie at least a one, because the costumes and sets were amazing (as you would expect with that big of a budget), I loved the soundtrack, and the two youngest female characters (Julia Butters & Margaret Qualley) were the best parts of the entire movie. If you want to waste three hours of your life, then go see this film. If you just want to be educated on current pop culture, save yourself the time and watch the excellent trailer. Rex Reed from the Observer says it best, "Rancid, preposterous and hysterically over the top in ideas and execution, "once upon a time" perfectly describes writer-director Quentin Tarantino's ninth film."
"The movie drags on like a turtle on valium, cramming in the period clichés like concession-stand popcorn."
"They all seem to be guests at some insider wrap party to which the audience is not invited."
*(random quotes from his review)… Expand

13 of 34 users found this helpful1321

All this user's reviews

9

WestenderJul 30, 2019

I really enjoyed the film. definitely in his top 3 in my books. it has it all - laughs, drama, emotion, beautiful cinematography, suspense, and of course some gratuitous violence! no one else makes movies like this.

11 of 23 users found this helpful1112

All this user's reviews

8

Trineo99Jul 30, 2019

First of all, I will say that the story is an interesting one but Quentin Tarantino told it in a confusing way. What I mean by that is that the movie was all over the place until it finally got its grounding in the middle. Until the middle,First of all, I will say that the story is an interesting one but Quentin Tarantino told it in a confusing way. What I mean by that is that the movie was all over the place until it finally got its grounding in the middle. Until the middle, the movie would cut away to tell a different story at random points instead of just finishing that one person’s story and then transitioning to the next. Because of this the film to me just felt a bit choppy and all over the place. This movie is two-hours and forty-one-minutes long and I feel like it could have been cut down. Some scenes just felt like they dragged on for far too long and there were so many perfect spots for the movie to end but it just kept dragging on and the ending we got comes out of nowhere and doesn’t fit the rest of the film so it should have just been removed. The acting in this film though was great. Leonardo DiCaprio and Brad Pitt easily came off as friends and this seems like such a minor thing but really, it’s a major thing. Sometimes actors can’t act like friends who have known each other but they came across as people who have worked together for years. Now, I’m not the biggest Leonardo Dicaprio fan but this film made me slowly start to appreciate his acting a bit more. For me, he was the stand out in this film because he could easily do both serious and funny scenes. Brad Pitt and Margot Robbie, who play Sharon Tate, also did great jobs. The soundtrack to this film was filled with great songs from that decade. In the end, this film is defiantly for people who are Quentin Tarantino fans or just want to relive the glory days of older Hollywood.… Expand

6 of 15 users found this helpful69

All this user's reviews

10

Compi24Jul 29, 2019

Amidst this year of unnecessary remakes, bloated sequels, and pathetic attempts at establishing IP, in comes Quentin Tarantino with a movie so wacky, so audacious, and so out there that you honestly can't help but smile when the creditsAmidst this year of unnecessary remakes, bloated sequels, and pathetic attempts at establishing IP, in comes Quentin Tarantino with a movie so wacky, so audacious, and so out there that you honestly can't help but smile when the credits finally roll. Yes, it's based on true events, but don't be fooled. This is a movie with a whole lot more going on with it than simply retelling certain historical moments. More deliberately paced than most Tarantino flicks, "Once Upon A Time In Hollywood" takes its sweet time building to its eventual climax. But, dear God, what a climax it is. An easy contender for one of the best scenes I've ever seen Tarantino pull off from script to screen (right beside the tavern scene from "Inglourious Basterds" and the pawnshop scene from "Pulp Fiction"), the finale expertly blends terror, dramatic irony, and comedy all into one incredible experience. I'm not sure I can say it's all entirely worth the near-three-hour running time, but once you see where and how everything falls into place, it gets pretty damn close.… Expand

6 of 15 users found this helpful69

All this user's reviews

1

Klove1978Jul 29, 2019

Horrible! We left after almost 2 hours of the most boring film I've ever seen! Total waste of time and money! Do yourself a favor amd save your money! I'd give it 1/2 star out of 5.

21 of 54 users found this helpful2133

All this user's reviews

10

YeetusMcGeetusJul 29, 2019

One of Tarantino's best. This is a masterpiece of film from a master filmmaker. Great performances. Gripping scenes. A deep, thought-provoking story, and a hugely satisfying ending make this movie one I can't wait to see a second time!

10 of 21 users found this helpful1011

All this user's reviews

10

The3AcademySinsJul 29, 2019

Once Upon is one of the most layered and memorable movies I have seen in 2019. It's easily the best film of the summer, and I want to go see it again to see what things I missed or will view differently. This is a hypnotic, nostalgic, andOnce Upon is one of the most layered and memorable movies I have seen in 2019. It's easily the best film of the summer, and I want to go see it again to see what things I missed or will view differently. This is a hypnotic, nostalgic, and surprisingly accurate love letter to the Golden Age of Hollywood. Setting the movie during the death of the Golden Age only heightens the themes presented by the script.

When speaking of scripts, I mean, this is a masterpiece. A lot of people have been saying this is Quentin Tarantino's take on The Big Lebowski, and in a sense, that's true. It's the story of a stuntman, a starlet, and a has-been, set against a backdrop of larger things, more complex things, such as the Vietnam War and the Manson Family. Really, the characters are self absorbed with their own trials and tribulations, and this film is a character study to it's core. The way the story uses the stages of a stuntman, starlet, and has-been to examine life as an artist is complex and compelling.

Visually, the movie looks beautiful. I was spoiled, as I saw a 70mm screening, but the way colors and light and texture interact is just mesmerizing. All in all, I have nothing other to say than Quentin Tarantino did it again. Watching movies made by a man who loves movies is such a treat. I can't wait to rewatch this one.… Expand

4 of 14 users found this helpful410

All this user's reviews

5

conquerator2Jul 29, 2019

Somewhat disappointing given Tarantino's previous movies which usually struck a good balance of story and action. Once Upon feels slow and drawn out with interesting bits sprinkled here and there for what felt like a Di Caprio / PittSomewhat disappointing given Tarantino's previous movies which usually struck a good balance of story and action. Once Upon feels slow and drawn out with interesting bits sprinkled here and there for what felt like a Di Caprio / Pitt documentary. The ending is typical Tarantino gore goodness and the there are some genuine brilliant bits sprinkled elsewhere but as a package it left me feeling overall disappointed.… Expand

6 of 16 users found this helpful610

All this user's reviews

9

GreykingJul 29, 2019

Very slow, meandering, and pointless a lot like real life. But the ending of the film is what makes it all worthwhile. 3 days later I'm still thinking about Rick and CLiff and wondering how their real-world lives would have turned out.

14 of 26 users found this helpful1412

All this user's reviews

3

SWEEPtheLEG175Jul 28, 2019

The Hateful 8, Inglorious Bastards, R Dogs, Pulp Fiction, Kill Bill are a few films on my all time favorite list. This film was terrible. I saw people leaving the theatre after about an hour. I would have done the same, but Brad and LeoThe Hateful 8, Inglorious Bastards, R Dogs, Pulp Fiction, Kill Bill are a few films on my all time favorite list. This film was terrible. I saw people leaving the theatre after about an hour. I would have done the same, but Brad and Leo are unreal and I could watch either of those guys paint or sew and still be entertained. If people didn't know it was a QT film they would have rated it lower, everyone is just scared or blinded by his greatness. Again, the acting was a 10, but there isn't a story. The last 15min are great, that is it.… Expand

16 of 39 users found this helpful1623

All this user's reviews

10

MacanoodoughJul 29, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I think this is a great QT Film. A different genre than he's done previously (3 Crime, 2 Western, 1 WWII, 2 revenge Kung Fu) This is just a Story Driven Drama. Always strong characters aret in his stories and these are even more so. THe whole flick delves deep into these 2 guys and it truly is, IMHO his best on that level. A fitting homage to a legend made so by tragedy (her widower's infamy not withstanding) But Sharon Tate deserved this. A true Fary Tail with a Fairy Tail ending and Brad briegly revisits and old part that fiorst made him famous, allbeit for a single line of dialogue, but it went a long way for me. An amazing movie I will pay to see again.… Expand

5 of 14 users found this helpful59

All this user's reviews

8

KeithDowJul 29, 2019

We’re not going to lie: Quentin Tarantino’s ninth film, ‘Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood’ is not an easy film to review. There are plenty of good, bad, and indifferent parts of the movie to touch on, all further complicated by the fact thatWe’re not going to lie: Quentin Tarantino’s ninth film, ‘Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood’ is not an easy film to review. There are plenty of good, bad, and indifferent parts of the movie to touch on, all further complicated by the fact that the bar for any Tarantino picture is already incredibly high—perhaps unfairly so.

What do we mean by that last part? Well, overall the film has been received quite positively by film critics, though Tarantino acolytes seem to be a little more tepid about it. But what if this film weren’t written and directed by Tarantino, and instead was made by a lesser-known entity? Would it be considered a masterful piece of filmmaking, a breakout success largely unparalleled by anything else released so far this year? There’s no actual answer to this. We simply wonder …

Meanwhile, let’s start with the bad stuff. The middle of the film is somewhat meandering, meaning this is the third film in a row that Tarantino could’ve trimmed some fat to make the movie that much more invigorating. And what do his three most recent movies all have in common? The absence of Tarantino’s long-time editor, Sally Menke, who tragically died at the age of 56 while hiking in Beachwood Canyon during a heat wave.

Furthermore, a key component of Tarantino’s movies is the way he incorporates music into the film, choosing the perfect song to complement what is seen on the screen. Our biggest gripe with ‘Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood’ is that the songs were often abruptly cut short, never being allowed to fully play out and truly meld with the action unfolding on screen.

On the positive side, the film is about 90% less violent than a typical Tarantino flick, meaning it’ll be a lot more accessible to moviegoers who previously avoided the filmmaker due to his penchant for frequently utilizing gory deaths. This makes the film closer to ‘Jackie Brown’ in both substance and style than most of his other works.

Lastly, ‘Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood’ proves once and for all that Leonardo DiCaprio is among the finest and most talented actors of his generation. He is downright captivating in every single scene. And considering he is an actor playing an actor—one of the hardest roles there is to pull off in Hollywood—it makes his performance that much more extraordinary.… Expand

6 of 15 users found this helpful69

All this user's reviews

6

bbonkJul 29, 2019

This movie has great nostalgia and plot surprises. However, the movie moves too slow and is too long. The story telling is pretty good but not as engaging as many of the previous Tarantino movies.

8 of 22 users found this helpful814

All this user's reviews

10

albethosJul 29, 2019

Tied with "Reservoir Dogs" as the second best movie Tarantino has ever made.
A masterpiece and the best movie of the year so far. Oscars right now for Pitt and Robbie, please?

3 of 16 users found this helpful313

All this user's reviews

5

TheMovieDuderJul 29, 2019

I love tarentino, but this movie was honestly boring and overhyped. The film had virtually no plot, no tension or even a reason to have been made. Characters are introduced with no relevance to the story just to add useless dialogue.

8 of 24 users found this helpful816

All this user's reviews

10

JesterRaceJul 29, 2019

One of Tarantino's best, if not his most polarizing. DiCaprio is sensational as Dalton. Obviously going in I knew that this movie would be divisive, considering the subject matters of the film. I knew that fans were going to have a tough timeOne of Tarantino's best, if not his most polarizing. DiCaprio is sensational as Dalton. Obviously going in I knew that this movie would be divisive, considering the subject matters of the film. I knew that fans were going to have a tough time with this one. One of the main criticisms for this film is that it has no plot. I strongly disagree. QT's intentions here are to show a historical portrayal of Hollywood and the 60s. The film uses Dalton's arch to exemplify that. The film is very similar to Pulp Fiction in how it's constructed. The two leads are grerat, but for me, It's one of DiCaprio's best roles ever.… Expand

6 of 16 users found this helpful610

All this user's reviews

2

wingnutzJul 29, 2019

I never thought I would say this about a QT film, but this movie was boring beyond belief. QT seems to occupy the position that Woody Allen held before he fell from Hollywood grace: stars want to be in his films to give themselves "artistI never thought I would say this about a QT film, but this movie was boring beyond belief. QT seems to occupy the position that Woody Allen held before he fell from Hollywood grace: stars want to be in his films to give themselves "artist cred". That can be the only explanation for why this roster of great actors/stars signed up for this non-event.

The worst part was how the dialog was curt and stiff. Until now, there was no better screenwriter in film than QT. Until now.

And poor Margot Robbie. She was left playing a vapid cookie cutter character with virtually nothing to add to the story except to be the historical prop of Sharon Tate.

My expectations were perhaps too high, but this was pablum. I cannot understand the critic reviews except to believe that they, like the actors, fall under QT's "artist director" spell.… Expand

14 of 37 users found this helpful1423

All this user's reviews

1

psychicmuppetJul 29, 2019

This was really disappointing. There was basically no plot. The movie had no momentum. It feels like Tarantino got so wrapped up in the setting he forgot about the story. It was just all so boring. Did we really need to see the trailers forThis was really disappointing. There was basically no plot. The movie had no momentum. It feels like Tarantino got so wrapped up in the setting he forgot about the story. It was just all so boring. Did we really need to see the trailers for movies no one's heard of before Tate watches The Wrecking Crew? Did we need 45 minutes of plot details for Bounty Law and Lancer? I wish I'd skipped this one and just watched Inglourious Basterds again instead.… Expand

32 of 62 users found this helpful3230

All this user's reviews

1

GoetheJul 28, 2019

Regrettably, Once Upon a Time is yet another morally idiotic, stylistically tired, structurally undisciplined and thematically cliched jerk-off of a film from aging narcissist Tarantino. Overblown accents, overplayed character types,Regrettably, Once Upon a Time is yet another morally idiotic, stylistically tired, structurally undisciplined and thematically cliched jerk-off of a film from aging narcissist Tarantino. Overblown accents, overplayed character types, distasteful violence and disappointingly dull dialogue plague this Death Proof-caliber clunker. Perhaps somebody should tell this man to retire already at flick number 9. One thing’s for sure: the days of Pulp Fiction and Jackie Brown are long gone.… Expand

12 of 33 users found this helpful1221

All this user's reviews

9

fifi3Jul 28, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This movie was a little slow, but the cinematography was awesome. The acting was brilliant. And the final 30 minutes were just absolutely hilarious. There was such a weird mix of emotion seeing all these characters oblivious to deranged psychopaths coming in while they happily listened to music or took acid and walked their dog. It's definitely a must-watch because of the roller coaster, and is a great addition to QT's legendary filmography.… Expand

3 of 11 users found this helpful38

All this user's reviews

4

fmulhareJul 28, 2019

This is a merry-go-round, pastiche tour of Hollywood in the late sixties with Tarantino's usual alternative history tacked on at the end.Despite all the bells and whistles it is ultimately like a boring museum tour. Plotless, characterlessThis is a merry-go-round, pastiche tour of Hollywood in the late sixties with Tarantino's usual alternative history tacked on at the end.Despite all the bells and whistles it is ultimately like a boring museum tour. Plotless, characterless and at times threatening to be endless you find yourself wondering when is the real movie going to start.The real star of the movie is the dog who becomes the prime agent of the alternative ending!… Expand

19 of 47 users found this helpful1928

All this user's reviews

0

glamgirlJul 28, 2019

I honestly don't know what everyone is raving about. Sure there were a couple of funny parts at the end... after a loooong 2.5 hrs of nothing. They made it look just like it did in 1969, but really who cares? Watch a movie filmed back then ifI honestly don't know what everyone is raving about. Sure there were a couple of funny parts at the end... after a loooong 2.5 hrs of nothing. They made it look just like it did in 1969, but really who cares? Watch a movie filmed back then if you want nostalgia and it will actually be good. The acting was well done, but the story sucked so bad that the acting didn't matter. I usually love Quentin Tarantino movies but this was absolutely awful.… Expand

34 of 79 users found this helpful3445

All this user's reviews

9

bfoore90Jul 28, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Quentin Tarantino tells an interesting fairy tale here with Once Upon A Time In...H-Wood. Brad Pitt and Leonardo DiCaprio are incredible in this, Brad Pitt puts out one of his best performances in a long time in this. Margot Robbie is great but shes kinda just, in the background as Sharon Tate and not really as important to the story as you would think. The film can kinda feel like it can drag a bit as it's heavy on Tarantino's quibby dialogue but the second half is extremely well done. With the ending, obviously Tarantino has twisted history in the past films like Inglorious Bastards and Hitler being assassinated in a movie theater. So Tarantino's adaption of the Manson murders, I feel gives Tate almost an ending she deserved instead of the tragically horrifying one she got.… Expand

3 of 13 users found this helpful310

All this user's reviews

6

notheguyJul 28, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Idk about this one, really felt like this movie should’ve been great, it wasn’t bad like some reviews might leave you to believe, but it wasn’t as good as so many are putting it out to be. The Acting, Spectacular; The Setting, extremely warm and nostalgic; But The Plot, Non - Existent. The whole movie just rambled on at times and felt like it was getting nowhere (On a side note: the way the characters at the playboy mansion were introduced felt a little lazy on tarantino’s part). The whole vibe of the movie and the acting throughout was what brought my rating to as high as it did. I honestly expected more and i am, in a way, disappointed.… Expand

6 of 18 users found this helpful612

All this user's reviews

9

carabethJul 28, 2019

If you LOVE Tarantino, and you want to watch two of the best actors today, run don't walk.

11 of 24 users found this helpful1113

All this user's reviews

9

InstantkrmaJul 28, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. It is not the most well directed Tarantino, nor does it necessary have a plot or the bit of previous films. And for some strange reason none of what I previously mentioned actually makes this movie… Expand

3 of 12 users found this helpful39

All this user's reviews

10

LzombietJul 28, 2019

The movie lives up to its nane by depicting the Hollywood ending we would have preferred in place of the reality.

4 of 14 users found this helpful410

All this user's reviews

9

BibliographerJul 28, 2019

One of the best films of the year and of Tarantino's career. This is a valentine to Hollywood, to the western genre and to the power of storytelling. There’s a lot to disagree with, even while appreciating the viewpoint, and digging theOne of the best films of the year and of Tarantino's career. This is a valentine to Hollywood, to the western genre and to the power of storytelling. There’s a lot to disagree with, even while appreciating the viewpoint, and digging the layers. It’s a movie about movies, westerns, Hollywood, fairy tales, and America.… Expand

10 of 22 users found this helpful1012

All this user's reviews

8

ImaginaryCriticJul 28, 2019

One thing for sure is, this is no Pulp Fiction or Django but its still a memorable Tarantino film. I felt like there was a little drag and really slow at points but hey its always worth it at the end.

5 of 14 users found this helpful59

All this user's reviews

4

EeltJul 28, 2019

Non eventful..kept waiting for something to happen..not even worth rental much less movie ticket...hopefully Q will try again

28 of 61 users found this helpful2833

All this user's reviews

2

ehstadelJul 28, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I checked spoiler alert so I don’t spoil the movie for others by saying that the movie is pointless and goes nowhere. Nothing happens. There isn’t much of a plot or a story. The movie feels like a big prank by Tarantino to see if everyone will love the movie because they feel like they have to. I’ve loved every movie he’s done, but this one is a mess. The acting was great, no doubt about it. Leo and Brad still couldn’t save this turd of a movie. Very disappointing.… Expand

14 of 38 users found this helpful1424

All this user's reviews

0

dallen1244Jul 28, 2019

Ok, so I am way over 50 and that will without doubt eliminate me from any valid consideration by millennial observers of my review. Fine, don't care. Can't speak for final 30 min. because I walked out, however, just want to say this, becauseOk, so I am way over 50 and that will without doubt eliminate me from any valid consideration by millennial observers of my review. Fine, don't care. Can't speak for final 30 min. because I walked out, however, just want to say this, because it's important. No make believe here, Sharon Tate and Bruce lee were real life, caring and unique onto themselves flesh and blood human beings. What they weren't are empty props for Tarantino to render them one dimensional silly people. Sharon appears as some 10 year old none to bright star struck girl outside a movie theatre showing her 1968 film with Dean Martin. By the way, real life bulletin here. she came horribly near to drowning after a parachute jump went very wrong in one scene. She was traumatized by that and still toughed out the movie. That's the Sharon Tate I like to think about. Resolute, determined and one who made this world a little better place for those lucky enough to have known her. A woman of a lot more depth and character than Tarantino supplied her character with, for Damn sure. Bruce Lee? let's see, we have, in this genius martial arts legend, a man who revolutionized the dicipline and sport he mastered and even expanded on, with Jet Kun Do. What does Tarentino do with him? He has him tutoring a studio set cast on martial arts philosophies before lapsing into the reverse mentality by instigating a confrontation with Brad Pitt for no actual tangible cause except to act the bully show off. Ask anyone of his friends and students, all well published interviews over the decades, and they will tell you about this gross fake representation of his true personality. I won't waste time with the rest of the film. It was virtually painful to sit through. Was Decaprio channeling Doc Holliday or something with all the gratuitous spitting, hacking, red eye tearing, and constant over acting, thought for sure he was a congestive. (he's no Val Kilmer) Where did all that come from anyway ? who knows, why waste interminable amounts of time on empty dialogue, who knows? Was there a legitimate movie in there someplace? not that happened by me before catching the exit. Summation: Tarantino dishonored Sharon Tate and Bruce Lee. That is what really matters here. period.… Expand

22 of 60 users found this helpful2238

All this user's reviews

10

LolloBarcolloJul 28, 2019

I really can't say anything that i didnt like about this movie.
It is perfect and definitely a masterpiece.
The magic between the two main characters is touchable.
Congrats to everybody who worked in this movie. The best movie in 10 years.

4 of 14 users found this helpful410

All this user's reviews

9

moviemitch96Jul 27, 2019

I'm such an unabashed, die hard Quentin Tarantino fan! As far as I'm concerned, the man's a genius and has never made a single bad film! Every new film of his is like Christmas for me, as I always eagerly await to see what he has in store forI'm such an unabashed, die hard Quentin Tarantino fan! As far as I'm concerned, the man's a genius and has never made a single bad film! Every new film of his is like Christmas for me, as I always eagerly await to see what he has in store for us next with each new film, as his style is just so unique and in-your-face. So you can probably imagine my excitement when I found out that his next film would be set during the golden age of Hollywood during the time of Sharon Tate and Charles Manson, star an amazing ensemble cast headlined by Leonardo DiCaprio and Brad Pitt, and would pay homage to films and Hollywood in general. That's pretty much all of my favorite things wrapped up in one spectacular package! And I'm more than happy to report that it did not disappoint and delivers on virtually every front! Granted, those familiar with Tarantino's style are probably aware of how ultraviolent his films are throughout, so it was a little surprising to see most of the action and gore in the film's final half-hour or so, but he more than makes up for this with an excellent screenplay and dialogue that's come to be expected from him, along with a colorful array of witty characters and moments throughout. DiCaprio and Pitt, two of Hollywood's biggest stars, are paired together perfectly and work off each other hilariously throughout the entire film! I only wish Sharon Tate (played beautifully by Margot Robbie) could've been utilized a little more in the film. Overall, Tarantino may have pumped the brakes a little more on the action and violence for this film, but when the violence finally does kick in in the last half-hour, for me it was well worth it! And like I said before, the always-entertaining characters and dialogue, along with plenty of love nods to other Hollywood films, actors, and icons made it such an enjoyable watch!… Expand

4 of 14 users found this helpful410

All this user's reviews

9

superfieldsJul 27, 2019

Tarantino’s masterpiece! His best work in a long time. Pitt and Leonardo are dynamite and Margot Robbie gives a small but memorable performance.

9 of 20 users found this helpful911

All this user's reviews

10

Davrosdaleks1Jul 27, 2019

Tarantino's done it again with a highly entertaining movie.

Once Upon a Time... in Hollywood is a complete ode to sixties films and television, jammed full of nostalgia. The movie looks great, both colored and shot to evoke the era. CostumeTarantino's done it again with a highly entertaining movie.

Once Upon a Time... in Hollywood is a complete ode to sixties films and television, jammed full of nostalgia. The movie looks great, both colored and shot to evoke the era. Costume and setting is strongly nostalgic.

Yet again Tarantino shows a true mastery of film with inspired editing, music and camera work.

This is the closest the director has gotten to a pure comedy with some strongly crafted bits and dialogue. With his emphasis on more intense action-oriented films these past few years, it's nice to see him returning to a more let's-have-fun-with-this tone that he had in Pulp Fiction and his segment in the anthology film Four Rooms. (That short contribution is tragically underexposed. You should really see it if you get the chance.) As with most Tarantino films, he does a great job of catching you off-guard at moments with the plot.

Needless to say that Leonardo DiCaprio and Brad Pitt are great actors, but they really knock it of the park here with the former as a comically over-the-top insecure actor and the latter as his cool, confident stunt man/chauffer/go-for/friend.

As had been his habit for some of his films, Tarantino succeeds despite his more questionable impulses. This includes but is not limited to frequent use of the b-word in regard to Hispanic Americans, the controversial use of Sharon Tate (Margot Robbie), Jay Sebring (Emile Hirsch), the Manson family, and Roman Polanski (Rafal Zawierucha). (Yeah, Polanski isn't in this or say that much, and his infamous crime doesn't factor into this, but it's hard not to think about it when he's mentioned. It doesn't help that Tarantino has defended him in the past. Yeah, Tarantino recently apologized, but you can't help wondering if he was sincere or did it for self-preservation due to the MeToo movement.)

Running at two hours and forty-one minutes, the second act is longer than it needs to be. A lot of the Sharon Tate scenes don't really add anything and I kind of felt that the role was so light that it wasn't worth an actress of Robbie's caliber.

This movie is an open range for Tarantino to spread his knowledge of film and television history. Some of it is rather interesting, but there is just so much that it feels self-indulgent and awkward.

Yeah, if you're not a fan of Tarantino and thinks he goes too far, I don't think this'll change your mind. For everyone else: I personally think this is one of his top five pictures… Expand

4 of 14 users found this helpful410

All this user's reviews

10

IxidorsdreamsJul 27, 2019

Who gave this rating less than a 10 and actually likes film/cinema or the rich history of it?

This IS THE BEST FILM of any that I have seen since Collateral or The Departed. This is going to be watched fifty years from now the way a SpaceWho gave this rating less than a 10 and actually likes film/cinema or the rich history of it?

This IS THE BEST FILM of any that I have seen since Collateral or The Departed. This is going to be watched fifty years from now the way a Space Oddessy is still watched today.

**** Bravo Quentin… Expand

11 of 23 users found this helpful1112

All this user's reviews

10

The_kmanJul 27, 2019

The movie was creative and masterfully directed. DiCaprio and Pitt were amazing in the film! I'd highly recommend this movie to EVERYONE.

5 of 15 users found this helpful510

All this user's reviews

2

Thewho63Jul 27, 2019

R-Dogs and Pulp Fiction were pure genius. Since then outside of Inglorious Basterds everything he does is an homage to blacksploitation, kung fu, westerns, etc.....This movie was a waste of talented actors. It really seemed like 1969 LosR-Dogs and Pulp Fiction were pure genius. Since then outside of Inglorious Basterds everything he does is an homage to blacksploitation, kung fu, westerns, etc.....This movie was a waste of talented actors. It really seemed like 1969 Los Angeles was the star of this film. Leo's character was like a tip of the hat to Clint Eastwood in a way.
Just came away extremely underwhelmed, yet the critics are fawning over this lackluster outing.… Expand

14 of 39 users found this helpful1425

All this user's reviews

9

MLRJul 27, 2019

This is an amazing movie, with lovingly drawn characters with intricate back stories, the actor selection is amazing-- a dead ringer for Steve McQueen, Charles Manson, Squeaky Fromm, Tex, the whole Manson family. No expense spared recreatingThis is an amazing movie, with lovingly drawn characters with intricate back stories, the actor selection is amazing-- a dead ringer for Steve McQueen, Charles Manson, Squeaky Fromm, Tex, the whole Manson family. No expense spared recreating Hollywood 1969. Loving details--you could watch it 100 times and catch new details each time. Yes, I saw Samuel L. Jackson playing cards in the corner of the saloon.… Expand

10 of 26 users found this helpful1016

All this user's reviews

9

Meth-dudeJul 27, 2019

Tarantino's talent for screenwriting really shines in this masterfully crafted movie. Supported by an impressive cast and excellent acting performances, an interesting story, great cinematography and a satisfyingly Tarantino-esque ending,Tarantino's talent for screenwriting really shines in this masterfully crafted movie. Supported by an impressive cast and excellent acting performances, an interesting story, great cinematography and a satisfyingly Tarantino-esque ending, this is a movie not to miss.… Expand

7 of 16 users found this helpful79

All this user's reviews

6

JLuis_001Jul 27, 2019

I can't deny it: I'm disappointed. I'm disappointed because beyond my personal expectations I think this is the first Quentin Tarantino film since Jackie Brown that leaves me feeling empty.
I say this for very simple reasons and it's thatI can't deny it: I'm disappointed. I'm disappointed because beyond my personal expectations I think this is the first Quentin Tarantino film since Jackie Brown that leaves me feeling empty.
I say this for very simple reasons and it's that Once Upon a Time in Hollywood is the most simplistic film of the director and it sounds strange to say that about him and his work but it's the truth, at least in my point of view.

I don't know what kind of film he tried to nail down. I don't know what he was trying to say. I don't know where he was pointing but obviously there isn't much to take in. Because if there's something that happens to this film, it's that its plot is practically non-existent and it's just events that are everywhere to try to make this stuff more cohesive.

I must make something very clear and that is that for this story both the Manson family and Sharon Tate are simply collateral elements to reach an end.
I don't know how somebody could try to justify it otherwise, but Margot Robbie is more than useless for the full development of this film. She's only an instrument to construct the conclusion of the narrative and I suppose that this is the reason why she ends up surviving in this story, because it would have been despicable to use her death as a plot resource.

Obviously the film is built on a fairly weak narrative base and there's no way to fix it. That's the way it's built and most of the time you don't know where things are going with either of the two main characters. Both the character of Brad Pitt and DiCaprio are only parts of their environment. They don't have a beginning and obviously they don't have an ending.
Both actors are excellent, I cannot deny that, they're two veteran connoisseurs of their work but their great performances don't justify the whole experience.
As much as I tried to find a meaning, there never was one. The succession of events only occurr to fill the gaps while the climax is being built and when you finally reach that ending, which is a total Tarantino ending, I couldn't help thinking that when it arrived it was already too late and sincerely, as I said in the beginning when that ending comes, the feeling of emptiness begins to make a dent in you.

Once Upon a Time in Hollywood it feels as if I had seen a fable without a moral, without direction and sadly kinda meaningless.
I understand that for many people this film represents a tribute from Tarantino to a completely disappeared era. That is a love letter to Hollywood. A love letter to his industry and I guess that is understandable to some extent, but sincerely analyzing the whole thing, I can't take a small thing out of my head, and is that if this is a love letter... well it's a love letter that pretty much says nothing at all.… Expand

9 of 25 users found this helpful916

All this user's reviews

10

dpreasmyer23Jul 27, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Funny, charming, and even a little nostalgic. Best film of the year so far and Brad Pitt’s performance is Oscar worthy.… Expand

14 of 29 users found this helpful1415

All this user's reviews

4

fuzzynavolJul 27, 2019

This movie is nowhere near as good as Inglorious or Django. I even thought the Hateful 8 was underrated. This had none of the dramatic tension and too much of the "you're cool if you think Tarantino's funny" anti-humor. I don't recommendThis movie is nowhere near as good as Inglorious or Django. I even thought the Hateful 8 was underrated. This had none of the dramatic tension and too much of the "you're cool if you think Tarantino's funny" anti-humor. I don't recommend seeing it in the theatre.… Expand

24 of 56 users found this helpful2432

All this user's reviews

10

RichVernadeauJul 27, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Tarentino masterfully takes back the 60s and defeats the Manson family by offering an alternate ending to that tragic night. It's a tour de triomphe both psychologically and symbolically. IMO, Tarentino's greatest work, it approaches epic proportions like great classic literature. Look for the plethora of references and allusions, the fantastic attention to detail (even the car radios are playing KHJ Los Angeles with the Real Don Steele on Boss radio)... Eye-popping visuals and incredible stellar performances from a star-studded cast. You can see my video review of this film on the Richard Vernadeau channel on YouTube.… Expand

15 of 31 users found this helpful1516

All this user's reviews

10

Meme55Jul 27, 2019

I loved this movie. The cast is excellent especially Brad and Leo. Tarantino is a genius and a lover of film. This is a loving nostalgic valentine to a long lost era. The details are perfect. The sense of foreboding is palpable for thoseI loved this movie. The cast is excellent especially Brad and Leo. Tarantino is a genius and a lover of film. This is a loving nostalgic valentine to a long lost era. The details are perfect. The sense of foreboding is palpable for those who know what happened that fateful night. I will definitely see it again and it’s on my top 10 for the year. It isn’t rambling or too long. The time flew by. One of Tarantino’s best.… Expand

10 of 24 users found this helpful1014

All this user's reviews

8

theredskyJul 27, 2019

This was kind of a disappointment for me. Don’t get me wrong, I still like the film but it just wasn’t as great as I was hoping it would be. Here are the negatives. The film is structured weirdly which leads to the film being paced weirdly.This was kind of a disappointment for me. Don’t get me wrong, I still like the film but it just wasn’t as great as I was hoping it would be. Here are the negatives. The film is structured weirdly which leads to the film being paced weirdly. Some scenes just kind of cut away to a flashback. One scene features Bruce Lee and Brad Pitt’s character but you realize it is a flashback and it feels off. The film then montages through 6 months with narration. It feels out of place in this film and takes a little bit of interest out of the film. The scenes with Margot Robbie are kind of pointless. They don’t serve to move the story forward. The film just comes to a dead stop when she appears on screen. For a Quentin Tarentino film, it is just a tad bit too long. Since the film is long, at some point in the second act, you start to feel a little bored which isn’t a good thing for a Tarentino film. Here are the positives. The acting is phenomenal. Leonardo DiCaprio and Brad Pitt do fantastic jobs in their roles and have amazing chemistry together. DiCaprio has an especially hard job of playing the role of Rick Dalton and playing the characters that Rick Dalton plays. It’s genuinely impressive.Margot Robbie, even though most of her scenes are pointless, also does a fantastic job. Even all of the supporting characters who are only on screen for a short amount of time do a great job. There is not one bad performance. The story can be a little confusing at times but it’s mostly easy to follow. The film is more of a character study of DiCaprio’s character and Pitt’s characters rather than a plot driven story which is refreshing. The ending of the film, without going into spoilers is so awesome and shocking that you are sitting there with either this huge grin on your face or you are about to throw up. The dialogue feels natural mainly because it is a Tarantino film. The soundtrack is fantastic and uses some really good songs from the late 60’s. The production design is fantastic. Tarantino managed to make every aspect of the film feel like 1969 even down to the costumes and vehicles. The film is actually pretty funny too. There are a bunch of moments in the film where I was laughing a lot. The cinematography is good and there are a couple of really good shots and transitions. The film’s tone remains fairly consistent. Overall, Once Upon a Time in Hollywood may be a little too long and weirdly structured but showcases fantastic performances, great characters, and great production design while still showing that Tarantino is one of the greatest directors in Hollywood. I give Once Upon a Time in Hollywood an 8/10.… Expand

2 of 15 users found this helpful213

All this user's reviews

10

VillaJul 27, 2019

Really good movie. Not sure what these negatives reviews are talking about at all. Everyone did great in this movie and the story was really interesting. I’m glad they gave a tribute to Sharon Tate. I guess everyone hates Tarantino becauseReally good movie. Not sure what these negatives reviews are talking about at all. Everyone did great in this movie and the story was really interesting. I’m glad they gave a tribute to Sharon Tate. I guess everyone hates Tarantino because he’s different.… Expand

11 of 28 users found this helpful1117

All this user's reviews

10

alancoleman857Jul 27, 2019

This was the most fun I've had at the movies since I was a kid. Reviews seen to be decisive and I believe that's due to some people not knowing about the Manson cult and the movie being more about character rather than plot but for me it'sThis was the most fun I've had at the movies since I was a kid. Reviews seen to be decisive and I believe that's due to some people not knowing about the Manson cult and the movie being more about character rather than plot but for me it's one of my all time favorites.… Expand

7 of 21 users found this helpful714

All this user's reviews

6

Evanawsome200Jul 27, 2019

I think that the hype of this movie was really built around the cast and the fact that it was Tarantino's 9th movie. However, the cast is really who brought this movie to the just barely passable level that it achieves. Simply put it has noI think that the hype of this movie was really built around the cast and the fact that it was Tarantino's 9th movie. However, the cast is really who brought this movie to the just barely passable level that it achieves. Simply put it has no plot, there is no real problem produced, no actual climax and there is also no satisfying resolution to any of it. Sure the performance by Leo and Pitt are spectacular, but without them, I cannot even imagine what this movie would have been like. There where however some very cool sequences and ideas, plus the fact that we got to see what it was like to watch a scene shot in real-time. the long take and resets were cool and it was surreal to see how movies like this are shot. The stigma behind Tarantino and what a lot of people know him for is his great storytelling and interesting ways of telling it, (take Pulp Fiction as an example) but this one simply felt as if there was no real substance to it.
In conclusion, read up on the Manson family before watching this movie because you will enjoy it a bit more if you do, but Once Apon a Time in Hollywood seems like Tarantino simply missed the mark, and if it was not for Brad Pitt and Leonardo DiCaprio this movie would have fallen completely flat.
An endnote, I am going to see this again tonight so maybe I will leave with something more out of it and if I do I will change this review and my score.… Expand

7 of 22 users found this helpful715

All this user's reviews

1

Jenny134Jul 27, 2019

The emperor has no clothes... that about sums up this movie. It’s too bad that such mega watt talent was wasted on a meandering and boring movie. I’m convinced this is a practical joke that Is being played on us all.

21 of 56 users found this helpful2135

All this user's reviews

0

marco34laJul 27, 2019

This was most pointless, meandering, ridiculous, mish-mash of a "movie" that i've ever seen. DiCaprio's performance aside, there's no redeeming value in this flick folks. It's 2 hrs and 40 mins of NOTHING. The scenes (that have no meaning orThis was most pointless, meandering, ridiculous, mish-mash of a "movie" that i've ever seen. DiCaprio's performance aside, there's no redeeming value in this flick folks. It's 2 hrs and 40 mins of NOTHING. The scenes (that have no meaning or value) go on endlessly. This is more of a collection of scenes than a movie. I want a REFUND and an apology from the critics.… Expand

26 of 71 users found this helpful2645

All this user's reviews

10

VincentLikesMovJul 27, 2019

Tarantino delivers his most immersive film yet. The world building is something that is truly commendable. Tarantino expertly plays with your emotions in a way that makes it almost impossible to be able to predict what is going to happen next.

14 of 29 users found this helpful1415

All this user's reviews

3

branflakes4547Jul 26, 2019

This movie accomplishes nothing. Nothing of note happens in the first two hours. Characters show up and drop out like they weren't even there. The film doesn't build on itself. Nothing happens except "woah, wasnt that cool." The onlyThis movie accomplishes nothing. Nothing of note happens in the first two hours. Characters show up and drop out like they weren't even there. The film doesn't build on itself. Nothing happens except "woah, wasnt that cool." The only redeemable thing about the film is Vrad Pitt's character. Other than that it is a total waste of time… Expand

13 of 39 users found this helpful1326

All this user's reviews

9

amheretojudgeJul 26, 2019

Tarantino's humour is dramatically challenged and emotions mocked with silliness, there lies his film in between.

Once Upon A Time In... Hollywood Tarantino's bluff is so smart that the entire film feels stupid. A joke. So now, the questionTarantino's humour is dramatically challenged and emotions mocked with silliness, there lies his film in between.

Once Upon A Time In... Hollywood

Tarantino's bluff is so smart that the entire film feels stupid. A joke. So now, the question it raises is, Is it funny? Not particularly. It is not a funny joke. It is a joke that you'd wish you had told. It is a joke that filters its audience out and then welcomes you to an open discussion that could last for hours. Good. Productive hours. For the writer-director, Quentin Tarantino is grabbing all the sensitive glasses in one tray and is serving us with an upbeating groovy music and a cautionary manual of "how to" deal with the film. Or more accurately, the final showdown. The entire film is just consuming energy for those last moments. That he exonerates in a big smile.. and not a laugh. This is smart filmmaking.

Up till now, I have been in awe of his writing in all the films. But after this film, I am leaning towards his maturity and confidence as a director. And as an evidence there is a scenario placed in the middle of the film where Cliff Booth played by Brad Pitt enters a red zone. Not only does the cinematography and background score glorifies Tarantino's legacy in that very antic, but as a part of narrative he whispers the secret of the film with utmost honesty and whisk of his signature absurdity.

Bonkers! is your reaction as you leave the screen and to protect that feeling is his bulletproof script that stands tall with him. Tarantino, as a writer has been lately considering himself to be drawn towards the literary art form, subjugates his and his project's place in his creative form just as Shakespeare used to do in his days. Often pitching himself on screen as a metaphor or the state or stage he has been through in his life, Tarantino's penultimate project- swooping in every last drop- sums up his work like a final chapter of a novel.

Ergo, by the time credits starts rolling everything and everyone has left the room, letting the dust settle and satisfaction flood in. Leonardo DiCaprio embodying a persona as Rick Dalton ought to be up for the game giddily considering how bottomless the pit is when it comes to the emotions of his characters. It is a role that anyone would love to have and yet not taking it for granted, DiCaprio's finest moments can be seen on set fumbling and riffing with his co-stars.

But I have been in love with underrated character since the very beginning. And ergo Pitt's Cliff resonates more strongly to me than anyone. Primarily, because it had very less chances to work on screen. Often audience reacts to empathy in a character and for a character that never sees a fall in the film, Pitt has a daunting task to make those half-grins charismatic and also earned. And on that note, Pitt steals the show with a Hawaiian shirt, c***y know-it-all attitude, a loyal dog and pretty standard one-liners; which I think doesn't just signifies the Once Upon A Time In... Hollywood part but the whole lifespan of it.… Expand

6 of 16 users found this helpful610

All this user's reviews

9

contourivyJul 26, 2019

Simply put: Quentin Tarantino has done it once again! This movie is a well thought out love letter to the 60s in Hollywood. Although the film follows no clear plot it ends up adding to the charm of the movie because the story Tarantino isSimply put: Quentin Tarantino has done it once again! This movie is a well thought out love letter to the 60s in Hollywood. Although the film follows no clear plot it ends up adding to the charm of the movie because the story Tarantino is trying to tell really requires no structure. It's also worth noting this movie is hilarious. It is still that signature Tarantino humor that leaves you feeling guilty for thinking such dark scenes are funny. Although this isn't Tarantino's best work it's still a standout project that is worth a watch… Expand

4 of 14 users found this helpful410

All this user's reviews

9

gereihingJul 26, 2019

While I found some parts a little slow, thanks to great acting and dialogue, you don’t really mind. The picture is paced well so that it doesn’t feel that you’re waiting for something to happen. It’s more like just when you find yourselfWhile I found some parts a little slow, thanks to great acting and dialogue, you don’t really mind. The picture is paced well so that it doesn’t feel that you’re waiting for something to happen. It’s more like just when you find yourself asking if something is going to happen, it does. The best thing is that what happens usually comes out of the blue. This is my first time rating movies. Going to the movies anymore requires some monetary investment. I like to rate them either:
1. You won’t waste your money
2. Good but wait till you can rent it. 3. Ok but wait till cable. 4. I lost two hours of my life. This movie - #1!… Expand

6 of 16 users found this helpful610

All this user's reviews

10

msl555Jul 26, 2019

Quentin is back with a masterpiece. I almost gave up hope after his last few films. I'm going to go back for a second viewing, but this may be his best all round film. The Pitt & Dicaprio relationship was oscar worthy.

22 of 50 users found this helpful2228

All this user's reviews

2

GreatMartinJul 26, 2019

The only reasons to see Tarantino's latest movie are the really alive performance by Brad Pitt, the red Rottweiler Brandy and a scene where Margot Robbie, playing Sharon Tate, watches herself on the screen in a theatre and enjoying theThe only reasons to see Tarantino's latest movie are the really alive performance by Brad Pitt, the red Rottweiler Brandy and a scene where Margot Robbie, playing Sharon Tate, watches herself on the screen in a theatre and enjoying the audience's reaction plus it is always good seeing Al Pacino, even in a wasted role.

As to be expected in a Tarantino's film there is a lot of very vivid violence, much distortion of history and facts and a lot of extraneous scenes that bring nothing to the film.

I have always been a fan of Leonardo DiCaprio since "What's Eating Gilbert Grape" even in his lesser pictures but in this movie he is just bad and I put the blame on Tarantino's shoulders as director and screenplay writer. There are many cameos but none memorable or even remembered 5 minutes after you see them.

The only reasons to see "Once Upon A Time...In Hollywood" are if you have 2 hours and 41 minutes of your life to waste and/or your electricity has gone out and this is the only theatre that has air conditioning!… Expand

22 of 61 users found this helpful2239

All this user's reviews

Once Upon a Time ... in Hollywood

User Reviews