Read User Reviews and Submit your own for Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald

6

CoolBRSep 4, 2023

An okay movie, there isn't anything much special about it. The plot is generic without many memorable scenes, we just keep following the same characters that appeared in the last movie.

For Harry Potter fans there are many references andAn okay movie, there isn't anything much special about it. The plot is generic without many memorable scenes, we just keep following the same characters that appeared in the last movie.

For Harry Potter fans there are many references and nostalgia which makes the movie better.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

seanxiaoMay 10, 2023

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

Kdog152Jan 11, 2023

Just as good as the first film. These films just keep getting better, though what should I expect from a film based on a book by one of the best authors in history. However, there were a few things that didn't make sense. for example, thereJust as good as the first film. These films just keep getting better, though what should I expect from a film based on a book by one of the best authors in history. However, there were a few things that didn't make sense. for example, there are a few times were a name from harry potter is mentioned at Hogwarts, such as travers, except, travers doesn't go to school some 2 decades after, as he is at school with Tom riddle. Lita lestrange dies and her brother is dead, so how does Rudolfus lestrage be born, if the lestrange family is extinct? there are so many plot holes in this film. Like, how is Credence a Dumbledore? Dumbledore only had 2 siblings, Arian and Aberforth. The beginning scene was pretty crap too. But for the most part, it was good. The last 20 minutes was especially good.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

Fixer84Mar 16, 2023

A dull and flat film that leaves you absolutely nothing at the end of the vision, if not the awareness that going forward at this rate it will only get worse.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Manuel89qqDec 15, 2022

⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

1

CarlElmoreNov 22, 2022

This has to be the worst screenplay for a major blockbuster film ever written.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

Alexander454Oct 27, 2022

Depp did an outstanding job Really sad he wont be returning Great movie. Loved it

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

chrisblackeye1Jul 8, 2022

I can see why some people say it's boring, but I was on the edge of my seat the whole time. The Wizarding World is just so goddamn interesting.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

Demitje20Jun 15, 2022

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The movie is a great mix between the Fantastic Beasts and Grindelwald story. It is a watch if you love both of these in the previous movie. The story between Dumbledore and Grindelwald is so sad and so beautiful at the same time. This movie shows that their is still love from both sides. You also see that their is heartbreaks and that 2 people deal with it differently… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

DariniMay 27, 2022

There were some slow point but I found most of the movie to be entertaining and enjoyable. I would recommend to anyone who is a fan of the series

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

iCampoRamilMay 18, 2022

Mucho más oscura de inicio, presenta una parte interesante de misterio/thriller, pero luego no acaba tan interesante y se apaga un poco. todo por una resolución del tema demasiado simple. Lo bueno que tiene, eso sí, lass pinceladas que dejaMucho más oscura de inicio, presenta una parte interesante de misterio/thriller, pero luego no acaba tan interesante y se apaga un poco. todo por una resolución del tema demasiado simple. Lo bueno que tiene, eso sí, lass pinceladas que deja para la tercera parte.

· Cosas buenas: detallitos y referencias para los fans fans, se la juega bastante al ser tan oscura, con discursos supremacistas y demás. Los efectos especiales son una auténtica maravilla, y cómo no, Johnny Depp lo hace impresionante de Grindelwald.
· Cosas malas: introducen demasiadas cosas sin propósito que dejan al espectador confuso con tanta saturación de información, es bastante caótica en líneas generales.
· Conclusión: se le nota a la legua que es una transición de la parte 1 a una tercera que se viene con un gran hype, aún así, tiene cosas guais, pero sin duda peor que la 1.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

ComandanteCobraMay 18, 2022

Not awesome , not terrible...average on the verge of boring.
It's a very long movie targeted toward adult vievers that didn't add much to the Potterverse.
Some inconsistency with Potter world can be irritating, but it is not the end of the world.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

r96skMay 12, 2022

Better than its predecessor, even if I still didn't really dig it.

'Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald' has more of a vibe about it, especially early on, and is marginally better paced. Overall, though, I'm kinda split on how I feelBetter than its predecessor, even if I still didn't really dig it.

'Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald' has more of a vibe about it, especially early on, and is marginally better paced. Overall, though, I'm kinda split on how I feel about this second instalment. It is a definite improvement, and yet I don't have any noteworthy positives to share about it. The cast, despite names I like, are just so forgettable to me in this.

As such, I don't feel like I can give it any more than a 6/10 rating - which feels harsh, but 7/10 feels too high. With that said, I still plan to check out 'Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore'. It just needs that little extra oomph and these would be films that I'd enjoy, so hopefully that 2022 release will produce.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

aaaaronApr 21, 2022

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. as a huge Wizarding World fan, I absolutely loved this film. I watched it soo many times and it is just so epic, so emotional, the characters and the story are just sooo complex. It is near to perfection in my opinion and a big improvement over the first movie.!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

DanF104Apr 15, 2022

An amazing plot, and distribution of story's, a lot of action and maybe one of the best of all Harry Potters lore

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

WordsmythologicApr 14, 2022

Please stop giving She Who Must Not Be Named money. Your nostalgia goggles are lying to you. The first movie was a disaster, and this one took a nosedive. The next sequels gets even worse.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

baynejordanjacoFeb 25, 2022

GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD good

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

DawdlingPoetNov 22, 2021

This follow up film features plenty of decent special effects and lots of CGI creatures, as was the case in the original film. I particularly enjoyed the choreographed scenes.

The plot is a bit confusing, which didn't entirely surprise meThis follow up film features plenty of decent special effects and lots of CGI creatures, as was the case in the original film. I particularly enjoyed the choreographed scenes.

The plot is a bit confusing, which didn't entirely surprise me given its a 'wizarding world' (i.e. Harry Potter universe) film and I've never been interested in Harry Potter but I watched it as I enjoyed the first 'Fantastic Beasts' film when I saw it on TV and I also enjoyed this follow up. There's a decent cast present, with Jude Law and Johnny Depp among them, plus of course Eddie Redmayne as Newt Scamander. I enjoyed his performance and found it a quite watchable and indeed entertaining film, even though I can't say I fully followed the ins and outs of every plot aspect but that doesn't always entirely matter. From what I've seen, a lot of people weren't much impressed with this film due to the plot being a bit scatter-brained. This didn't overly bother me, as I say and I did enjoy the special effects, although sometimes its more of an issue, such as with full out action films, if the main plot seems utterly implausible then it can put me off the whole film, though I really enjoyed watching this film. It's a nice enough form of escapism and so I'd recommend it for that purpose, although I'm not sure I'd say its better than the first film, its certainly not bad at all. Its surprisingly engrossing really and the CGI creatures have a real charm to them, so I felt, its just not a film to overly analyse or take especially seriously I suppose. I certainly enjoyed it more than I didn't.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

16westhJun 15, 2021

Absolutely love this movie! I am a big HP fan, and this was an excellent addition to the franchise. I thoroughly enjoyed it, from start to finish - it was superb.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

3

SoulWarfareMay 23, 2021

JK Rowling: The Crimes of Bad Writing.

Seriously so much exposition and padding with a lot of nothing happening. I can't believe they manage to make the Wizarding World look so boring.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

Hh110May 17, 2021

AWESOME MOVIE, honestly so good I absolutely loved! So incredible, this franchise never fails to impress!

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

meydianarizki21Apr 23, 2021

This movie was definitely more in line with the spirit of where the series is heading-the first Fantastic Beasts was a little fluffy. I liked the tone, I liked the pacing and the backstories. I liked the expositions of new characters. I amThis movie was definitely more in line with the spirit of where the series is heading-the first Fantastic Beasts was a little fluffy. I liked the tone, I liked the pacing and the backstories. I liked the expositions of new characters. I am super interested to learn more about how Nagini's story will her to being the right hand man of Voldemort. I felt like a couple lines were forced, such as "Grindelwald doesn't value that which is simple." I get that it was a recall to what Dumbledore says about Voldemort to Harry, but I felt like there was no motivation for that line since Newt would've had no reason to say this based on Newt's experiences with Grindelwald. There were some interesting things that could potentially set up some plot holes in the Potterverse. And I would say that I am not worried at all, but Cursed Child made plenty of mistakes in terms of plot direction that cheapened or poked holes in the Potterverse.

I actually like Grindelwald movie version more than Voldemort movie version (book version is a different story), he seems more sophisticated and his motives more reasonable.

Overall, I liked the tone. And felt encouraged by this installment. It seems to be following the Potter series in that it improves with each installment. I just really hope she does not poke holes in timelines, or plot points..… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

9

RavenclawGuyMar 10, 2021

This film does not deserve hate. No, it really doesn't. Yes, you need to know HP. J.K does know her audience, hardcore fans who know about the universe. Yes, maybe a lot of the movie has nothing to do with the other parts, but remember it's aThis film does not deserve hate. No, it really doesn't. Yes, you need to know HP. J.K does know her audience, hardcore fans who know about the universe. Yes, maybe a lot of the movie has nothing to do with the other parts, but remember it's a series with 3 movies to go, so the backstory will most likely come in later. 9/10 for the Rowling situation, if in the story alone 10/10.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

AuxikFeb 5, 2021

I liked this one a lot better than the first one. It felt a lot more serious and less campy/slapstick.

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

10

Only_EdgarJan 21, 2021

A perfect and well made movie. The movie was great from the beginning to the end.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

10

Beth_LondonJan 7, 2021

Una película extraordinaria y sin duda alguna se espera la próxima película, pero la verdad siento que será una decepción no ver a Johnny Deep como nuestro Grindelwald, no hay duda de que no hay otro como el ya que solamente el es nuestroUna película extraordinaria y sin duda alguna se espera la próxima película, pero la verdad siento que será una decepción no ver a Johnny Deep como nuestro Grindelwald, no hay duda de que no hay otro como el ya que solamente el es nuestro Grindelwald… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

0

Elder2FoxDec 30, 2020

This is so weak try to please everyone. I hate all about Dumbledore and Grindelwald, this was unthinkable interference to original story.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

3

FilmanwaltDec 17, 2020

The film is not enchanting, it is boring from front to back. Except for some great effects, great creatures, the film doesn't offer much. Part 1 was still convincing, but the next excursion in the expanded universe of Harry Potter wentThe film is not enchanting, it is boring from front to back. Except for some great effects, great creatures, the film doesn't offer much. Part 1 was still convincing, but the next excursion in the expanded universe of Harry Potter went wrong.

The film also relies too much on nostalgic moments. The only thing that is positive is that it combines individual pieces from the Harry Potter universe.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

vitortfvDec 16, 2020

Disappointed, as this new universe is not bringing me a bit of the emotions I felt with Harry Potter.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

9

ThejodjeremieNov 11, 2020

A fun action packed sequel that continues the story and also sets up another sequel later on. I really enjoyed the acting especially from Johnny Depp as grindelwald. The visuals are awesome as well.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

2

DorichannelJul 25, 2020

Confusingly terrible story and pacing. I watched this while on a flight to Korea...bad idea! Thank God it was free, because this does not live up to Harry Potter franchise potential AT ALL! The ending feels like the middle of a movie. I wasConfusingly terrible story and pacing. I watched this while on a flight to Korea...bad idea! Thank God it was free, because this does not live up to Harry Potter franchise potential AT ALL! The ending feels like the middle of a movie. I was like "What??? It's over? What was the point of the characters and the plot?" It was so unfulfilling.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

FilipeNetoJun 26, 2020

The Harry Potter universe is one of the most lucrative and striking cinematic phenomena ever and has faithful admirers. Personally, I am one of many teens who read all the books and saw all the films but I was very disappointed withThe Harry Potter universe is one of the most lucrative and striking cinematic phenomena ever and has faithful admirers. Personally, I am one of many teens who read all the books and saw all the films but I was very disappointed with “Fantastic Beasts”. However, I decided to watch this film and see if there would be any improvement here. And I'm glad I did. Far from being wonderful, its much better than its predecessor.

After the events of the first film, Newt Scamander is sent by Dumbledore to Paris in order to look for Credence, who survived. Also alive and gone missing is the fearsome Gellert Grindelwald, responsible for many deaths and atrocities, committed to starting a war for global dominance in which sorcerers are to dominate non-sorcerers.

Its a generally better film than its predecessor, as it has a lighter pace and takes much less time to develop. The story told seems to have gained a logical thread and that's a good thing. The use and appearance of magical creatures was not as intense as in the first film, and this may have helped to focus the film on the story which, until now, was too weak and uninteresting. However, too much creativity is also a problem as some ideas in the plot end up useless. The development of the characters improved and the material given to the actors was certainly better. David Yates did a good job and takes advantage of all his experience, as he directed the most adult and developed films in the Harry Potter franchise.

The cast, certainly due to a better script and material to work on, achieved better results. Despite all this, it continues to make unforgivable mistakes. Some sub-plots, sequences and even characters, like Flamel for example, are totally unnecessary. Eddie Redmayne finally manages to give Scamander a certain attitude and leadership, although he is still uncharismatic and boring. Katherine Waterston also improves here. Callum Turner is good, Zoë Kravitz was a good addition to the role of the psychologically complex Leta Lestrange and Jude Law shone as the intelligent and young Dumbledore. Less positive was Dan Fogler, who is no longer as funny as in the first film. If this ends up being compensated by gaining dramatic depth, the film gives a terrible excuse to justify his presence, given that the character had been “obliviated”, that is, had his memories erased at the end of the first film. On the negative side, I would highlight the poor performance of Alison Sudol. It was not her fault but the fact is that her sweet and stupid character stopped being sweet and became just stupid. Finally, we need to talk more about Johnny Depp. If the cameo in the first film achieved to hide what his participation was going to be, this film shows us the greatness of the actor in the role of another fearsome villain, who is not far behind Voldemort in malice and cruelty. The actor is good and brought his character to life in a brilliant way. If everything goes well for Depp in the films that follow, this could become one of the most outstanding characters in his career, who has left us great jobs before.

Technically, this is a very visual film, thanks to tons of very high quality CGI, as we would expect in the Harry Potter universe. Cinematography has good colors, a good use of light and dark and clear footage. To add aesthetic quality we have the charm of the Thirties, with its props and clothings. Much of the film is set between London and Paris, with a brief and unnecessary passage through Hogwarts, and the sets, in all these moments, were meticulously done. The soundtrack, by James Newton Howard, is good and epic, but not surprising.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

5

bfoore90Apr 28, 2020

Clear disappointment when compared to the first one, which I greatly enjoyed. The acting, visuals, score are top notch and sense of wonder are still there but the plot and screenplay is just so overstuffed that you almost feel this movie isClear disappointment when compared to the first one, which I greatly enjoyed. The acting, visuals, score are top notch and sense of wonder are still there but the plot and screenplay is just so overstuffed that you almost feel this movie is filling for something better. I loved the performances as the returning characters, creatures, ect and Johnny Depp is a very convincing villain but the script lacks focus with meaningless side-characters and subplots that end up going nowhere… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

6

enter_thedragonApr 18, 2020

Not horrible. Not especially good, I suppose. This movie felt like an episode in a television show, more of a transitory story from beginning to end. The plot is simple, if you can call it a plot. If you liked the beasts aspect of the firstNot horrible. Not especially good, I suppose. This movie felt like an episode in a television show, more of a transitory story from beginning to end. The plot is simple, if you can call it a plot. If you liked the beasts aspect of the first film there's some pretty cool few new beasts. Many callbacks to the Harry Potter lore we know and love. But the film was fairly weak. Go into it with no expectations, and see what you think. I'd still recommend it .… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

2

PalpetineSheevMar 20, 2020

I honestly don't have any idea what the hell J.K. was on when she wrote this script.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

1

SafeCloudNov 16, 2019

The movie is very boring. It feels like the first 90% of the movie is one big first act and it ads a atrociously bad plot twist at the end of the movie along with a battle scene that feels like it should be in the middle of the movie. None ofThe movie is very boring. It feels like the first 90% of the movie is one big first act and it ads a atrociously bad plot twist at the end of the movie along with a battle scene that feels like it should be in the middle of the movie. None of the characters feel like in the last movie, there are a lot of unnecessary sub-plots that go nowhere and there are too many characters. Also the tone of the movie is all over the place. In one scene you have Grindelwald killing an entire family, while in the other you have Newt playing with his creatures. The only praise I can give to this movie is the acting. Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald fails not only as a Harry Potter movie, but as a movie in general.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

3

SpenBuhGuNov 11, 2019

Really boring and dumb writing. I couldn't wait until it was over. Save yourself don't watch.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

0

GramathaNov 11, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Flat-out terrible film with no second act, a first act that goes for 1hr30m and a boring, poorly written third. No interest in seeing the next film. Congrats JK, you ruined Harry Potter… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

7

DominArsenOct 27, 2019

Le premier avait une.. Un quelque chose.. De plus grand que celui-ci a perdu. Il en reste un très bon film, mais inscrit dans une série ce qui fait que faire monter les enjeux n'est pas seulement sur un seul film, mais plusieurs. Harry potterLe premier avait une.. Un quelque chose.. De plus grand que celui-ci a perdu. Il en reste un très bon film, mais inscrit dans une série ce qui fait que faire monter les enjeux n'est pas seulement sur un seul film, mais plusieurs. Harry potter va finir par être l'univers cinématographique le mieux noté du monde si cette qualité est gardée de bout en bout. Une main de fer dans un gant de velours. Cet univers en plus d'être magique nous permet de caresser la vie de Dumbledor et de nous faire douter du réel personnage principal. Est-il dumbledor depuis le début ?

The first had a .. Something .. Bigger than this one lost. It remains a very good film, but registered in a series which makes raising the stakes is not only on a single film, but several. Harry Potter will end up being the highest rated film universe in the world if this quality is kept end to end. An iron hand in a velvet glove. This universe in addition to being magical allows us to caress the life of Dumbledor and make us doubt the real main character. Is he dumbledor from the beginning?… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

9

Sugarfreak00Oct 25, 2019

Amazing story, characters, music and visuals! Love the connections to the original series.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

2

hnestlyontheslyOct 12, 2019

The Fantastic Beasts series may be the best example since Annie Hall of a film with the biggest disconnect between the values of its fans and its producers including the (living proof that people do not always improve with prior experience)The Fantastic Beasts series may be the best example since Annie Hall of a film with the biggest disconnect between the values of its fans and its producers including the (living proof that people do not always improve with prior experience) JK Rowling. It continues a long and confusing annual tradition of the casting of a domestic abuser, found $7 million dollars guilty of beating up his wife, in roles that are a little too on the nose. In case you’re looking for a modicum of bravery and decency in the world, check out Amber Heard’s open letter from after she first filed from divorce from her abuser, which she reread recently at a conference. These are reasons enough to make sure that you do everything you can to avoid paying for this film–stream it illegally, borrow it from your friends, burn yourself a DVD from the library, sneak into the theater after having paid to see Ralph Breaks the Internet (read: my Saturday two weeks ago). With all those caveats, and with the understanding that we will be among the first to dance on that man’s grave when his decisions catch up to him, FB: CoG was kind of a snore, but a dark, brooding snore.

Someone has written about the unfortunate trope of lazy storytelling by way of magical slide presentations (with respect to Ego in Marvel’s Guardians of the Galaxy 2), but after an hour of sleuthing, I can’t find it. So if you find anything that attests to this, send it my way. In the meantime, FB: CoG oftentimes feels novelistic to a fault. Some examples: the way that Leda and her brother argue in the crypt about Credence’s identity is infuriating, because unlike with the convoluted, Shakespearean plot reveals of the HP series, the audience here has not had time to work through the intricacies of the plot reveal ahead of time. The reveal doesn’t have its desired effect of shock and pathos, instead it’s pretty frustrating to listen to these two minor characters quibble over something that happened decades ago, which we don’t have the ability to adjudicate or verify (Roshomon style) to a satisfying end. (Friend brought up the weirdness of how these epic figures from the HP universe are all really invested in nobody C-listers, quoting a reddit post: “Turning Eddie Redmayne, Jude Law and Johnny Depp into side characters for a weird Zoe Kravitz/Ezra Miller family drama was a mistake.”) Ditto the loose end of the murdered house elf scene. Ditto the MacGuffin in the PO Box that basically serves as a magic slide presentation of Leda’s family tree. Ditto Grindelwald snorting an old skull and vomiting WWII. The abundance of magical powerpoints is a real weakness to the momentum of the story.

That being said, CoG does move the ball further down the field. It’s a film that seems to have kept up with the age of its fanbase and is likely flying over the heads of a lot of its younger viewers: infanticide, rape, holocaust abound. We are looking at a (blinkered but) fuller picture of the Wizarding World outside of school and the effete world of Quidditch, Gringotts, and the Ministry. One of my favorite aspects of storytelling is the lack of logical coherence of Grindelwald’s philosophy. Grindelwald is not just an earlier Voldemort. He’s not the Morgoth before Sauron. He’s not rhetorically opposed to mixed marriages of wizards and non-magic peoples. He’s nominally opposed to police brutality and the horrors of war. His laissez-faire attitude toward most of the hot button social issues of the HP series makes him a lot more insidious a villain, because it’s not entirely clear what his Evil Plan actually is.

Whereas the last movie was about stunted desire, CoG takes on more taboo subjects and makes the investigation and the struggle to understand those taboos central to the story, which maybe isn’t the same thing as making an exciting movie necessarily.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

RebeccaWOct 1, 2019

Another amazing movie by JK Rowling. Love all the actors in this movie, perfect match for their characters. Awesome! Hope the same actors continue with last 3 movies. Excited to see them soon.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

1

ajzeg01Sep 21, 2019

When I first saw the trailers for this movie, I thought it was going to suck. But, once I sat down and watched the movie, much to my surprise...I was right. This is probably my least favourite movie of the year. There are way too manyWhen I first saw the trailers for this movie, I thought it was going to suck. But, once I sat down and watched the movie, much to my surprise...I was right. This is probably my least favourite movie of the year. There are way too many characters with way too many subplots going on all at once, the villain was horribly miscast, everything was confusing and didn’t make sense, the story was unfocused and pointless, there was way too much pointless fanservice, everything looked grey, it was BORING, and the whole thing only exists to set up sequels! So, yeah, this one’s pretty bad. It’s a new low for Warner Brothers and this franchise, and....hold on, wait a minute, there must be a mistake. I’m listing off all the reasons that I hated Batman v Superman, not Fantastic Beasts 2. Oh? They both have the exact same problems? Okay then! Screw this movie! I sure as hell am not seeing the next one until it comes out on demand! They have officially lost my interest!… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

2

Ikereviews1Sep 15, 2019

This movie is so terrible. as the first one was good. this movie has the iron man 2 problem but much worse. there are many rushed subplots and characters throught this movie. around 20 minutes could have been cut and the movie would have beenThis movie is so terrible. as the first one was good. this movie has the iron man 2 problem but much worse. there are many rushed subplots and characters throught this movie. around 20 minutes could have been cut and the movie would have been better than dragging out the plot.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

JaysographyAug 28, 2019

The Crimes of Grindelwald is the latest in the ever expanding universe of J.K. Rowling but also its second film in the Fantastic Beasts trilogy. From the beginning of the film you are filled with laughter and joy as you once again live outThe Crimes of Grindelwald is the latest in the ever expanding universe of J.K. Rowling but also its second film in the Fantastic Beasts trilogy. From the beginning of the film you are filled with laughter and joy as you once again live out your Harry Potter dreams as a child. However, while you are lost in the magic you might also end up leaving the film being lost in the plot as well. The main gripe with the film is that, technically speaking, the film never actually accomplishes anything. The movie ends where it began, there is no progress. Therefore leaving many critics scratching their heads as to why there should be a third instalment when they could have simply ended the series with a slightly longer than average film.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

ATHG-WAug 20, 2019

Einfach phantastisch dieser Film!

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

6

kushtopiaJul 28, 2019

On first watch, I loved the movie because it seemed like a genuinely interesting and complex narrative. The sound design, production, CGI, cinematography is all amazing, as expected, and the actors are on top of their game and give rise toOn first watch, I loved the movie because it seemed like a genuinely interesting and complex narrative. The sound design, production, CGI, cinematography is all amazing, as expected, and the actors are on top of their game and give rise to some very likable characters. Not to mention, the opening sequence of this movie is the best in the entire Harry Potter franchise. On second watch, however, I realized that my small suspicion that the movie wasn't as coherent as it seemed, was correct. This time, I made sure to pay attention to every detail, plot point, ect, and....this movie doesn't make sense in the slightest. Like not even a little. I suggest watching it once, and never watching it again. If you do this, there is a good chance you will like the film and will remember it fondly. If you watch it again, you'll notice how stupid it is. I'm giving this movie a 6 because it atleast tricked me into liking it on my first pass.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

2

The3AcademySinsJul 18, 2019

If the first Fantastic Beasts film was joking titled "Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find the Plot" then this Fantastic Beasts film can only be called "Fantastic Beasts and How to Ruin a Plot." Ho boy. There are so many retcons to the HarryIf the first Fantastic Beasts film was joking titled "Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find the Plot" then this Fantastic Beasts film can only be called "Fantastic Beasts and How to Ruin a Plot." Ho boy. There are so many retcons to the Harry Potter cannon and ridiculous plot twists that this movie made my head spin. The characters have no motivation, and honestly the special effects aren't that good. There is no doubt in my mind that JK Rowling is deep in the midst of her "George Lucas" phase. Time will only tell if she will sell her franchise and a an established producer will attempt to save it like George, though.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

3

BionicMattJul 3, 2019

This film might pick up after the first 45 minutes, but I'm not sure I have the patience to find out.

The wizarding world is still interesting, but all the CGI in the world doesn't make up for an uninteresting script.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

schokokipferlJul 1, 2019

The movie has potential, but it just comes out rather messy... too much is introduced at once and it just makes the audience confused. Queenie’s story, Nagini’s story, Leta’s story could all have been much more interesting if any of them wereThe movie has potential, but it just comes out rather messy... too much is introduced at once and it just makes the audience confused. Queenie’s story, Nagini’s story, Leta’s story could all have been much more interesting if any of them were given more attention. I’m really hoping FB3 makes up for it!… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

3

alianorareeJun 20, 2019

For much of the movie I was confused and bored, but still hopeful things could turn around... Then came the depressing, cliffhanger ending. I walked out of the theater thinking: "I don't really care about any of these people anymore."

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

0

calderraJun 17, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Crimes of Grindlewald is an objectively bad film, and I know how much people hate when you claim a movie is objectively bad. This one is.

Fact - The film has many abrupt jumps where characters will be in one place, and suddenly deep into the story in another, so clearly there was a longer edit of the film and a massive chunk was badly edited out. Non-spoiler: Characters are being chased in a library in a big action scene, hard cut, the same characters are all deep into a giant exposition dump inside a crypt. How did they get here? What's with the change in tone? The directly clearly hopes you'll shut up and eat your popcorn.

Fact - This film contradicts its own canon. A character in the first film literally explodes and is absolutely certainly dead, and the start of this film handwaves that character as still being alive. If death doesn't matter anymore in this movie, I don't care about any of the conflict. A character just caught fire and fell to dust? For all I know they're coming back in the next movie. Who cares?

Fact - The plot has some the biggest leaps in logic of any Harry Potter movie, bordering on incoherent script writing. In one scene it's explained that an important character actually died a long time ago - but wait - that character was accidentally mistaken for an even more important character. They have to leap through a bunch of hoops as to how this character's whole backstory was an insane, crazy coincidence - in order to introduce an even bigger coincidence on top of that! The big reveal is convoluted at best, and when it's explained poorly as it is here, it's just bad.

Fact - JK Rowling is going insane. Dumbledore is gay for no reason. I say "for no reason" here because the film is constantly telling you that characters are in love, and that being in love is their motivation for doing something. That's not interesting storytelling, that's just bad writing. Why is Dumbledore not fighting the bad guy? He's gay for him. Why is the hero going after a girl? He wants to bone her. Why is the fat guy chasing the blonde lady? He wants to bone her. Why is the asian lady hanging out with the freak? They seem to be sexually attracted. It's basically safe to assume the only reason anyone gets off their ass in this universe is that they're horny. It's dumb.

Fact - No seriously JK Rowling is insane. The whole plot hinges on Grindlewald telling wizards that they're being persecuted by the Ministry of Magic, not being allowed to marry muggles and so forth. Except he also wants only pureblood wizards to rule the world. So muggles have to be removed from power, but it's also cool if you marry them? That seems weird, but fine. So Gindlewald's whole argument rests on wizards being afraid of the terrible "aurors" - basically cops who kill bad wizards. He specifically says it's important wizards understand he's not the violent one. So how does he show he's non-violent? In literally the scene after that argument, he tries to destroy the world. What in the everliving hell is this terrible writing!? How would his followers not be mad that he's trying to murder tons of people - including wizards - when that is literally exactly the sort of behavior he's using to turn them to his side!? It's like listening to an actual insane person trying to explain political conspiracies to you.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

3

IsjanHamelJun 16, 2019

This was such a disappointment... Bad character building and just too much of everything and at the same time noting. Im sad now.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

JPKJun 14, 2019

Very Messy And Disappointing
Crimes Of Grindelwald may have great performances from Law and Depp, and beautiful special effects. But it’s also very messy with a pretty poorly written script, bland characters, and is pretty boring.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

Happy-KMay 26, 2019

A bit disappointing but i still liked the Movie. The problem with it is it still feels like the first part of an whole Story because it is over-pact with to many story-lines. For the audience to keep up with there is a lot of talking and theA bit disappointing but i still liked the Movie. The problem with it is it still feels like the first part of an whole Story because it is over-pact with to many story-lines. For the audience to keep up with there is a lot of talking and the story is more slower paced compared to the First movie. I still liked the darker tone of the Movie. I also like that Newt the main character isn't like the chosen one, no more like a part in the bigger picture. After all i liked it but the First one is way better.… Expand

5 of 5 users found this helpful50

All this user's reviews

4

TyranianMay 20, 2019

Plenty of colourful magic but seriously tedious characters and plot. Never does anything intelligent.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

2

PetjonApr 28, 2019

Honestly, i really enjoyed graves character in the first movie and bloody hated the "twist" at the end. But this movie.... Wow...
The main character is strung along the story for no reason, he has not one single thing that make me undersandHonestly, i really enjoyed graves character in the first movie and bloody hated the "twist" at the end. But this movie.... Wow...
The main character is strung along the story for no reason, he has not one single thing that make me undersand why he is there.
They ruined the best character waifu mind reader from the first movie, making her evil and joining the bad guy EVEN THOU SHE CAN READ BLOODY MINDS, SO IT SHOULD BE INMPOSSIBLE FOR HER TO GET TRICKED.

Dumbledore had a great actor, just a shame he didnt do anything in this movie.
Jonny depp was just a evil wizard doing evil because evil.
The whole movie feels like a fanfiction gone wrong.
They should have made three movies with three diffrent protagonist.
1. Zoo keepers Movie
2. Follow some kind of Auora that is hunting evil wizard Movie
3. Dumbeldores Movie… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

0

SH1Apr 23, 2019

I was seriously bored halfway through this movie. The CG was very good, but was unfortunately wasted on a poorly told story. This is like the Wheel of Time book 9 where you do not really care anymore, and have forgotten who most of theI was seriously bored halfway through this movie. The CG was very good, but was unfortunately wasted on a poorly told story. This is like the Wheel of Time book 9 where you do not really care anymore, and have forgotten who most of the characters are. I think it is time to move on from Harry Potter.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

10

abooApr 21, 2019

Despite the controversy, Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald, displays incredible direction from, David Yates, spectacular cinematography, and brilliant acting from the cast. The plot of the film sort of sets up the franchise for theDespite the controversy, Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald, displays incredible direction from, David Yates, spectacular cinematography, and brilliant acting from the cast. The plot of the film sort of sets up the franchise for the next three films.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

TomtagApr 14, 2019

There was great but less magic and we didn't see many creatures here but they were more beautiful and the previous ones. The story wasn't that good though, just wars

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

5

eva3si0nMar 28, 2019

2 part of Fantastic Beasts it is possible to look at a trailer. All plot in it is perfectly described. What in general sense to watch the movie if the only role of this movie to connect 1 part and not left 3 yet. In general it is impossible2 part of Fantastic Beasts it is possible to look at a trailer. All plot in it is perfectly described. What in general sense to watch the movie if the only role of this movie to connect 1 part and not left 3 yet. In general it is impossible to call the movie the integral work, considering as it comes to an end. If the 3rd part appears the same, then it will be the biggest extension of a plot, knowing Warner Borthers I will not be surprised. Mediocre cinema which discredits a saga name about Harry Potter.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

YunusKatMar 25, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. A great follow up on the previous one but one thing that still bugs me is the fact that everything needed to happen so fast. The movie flew by in a flash and just when u feel you are getting into the story it ends with a huge typical cliffhanger. It's in the Potterverse so the lore is amazing.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

2

SteprockMar 23, 2019

This movie didn't make a lick of sense. The plot, scenes, and characters bounced around so much you couldn't follow the plot. Clearly, if you haven't read all the books, this one isn't for you.

It's got flaws of basic film-making. ScenesThis movie didn't make a lick of sense. The plot, scenes, and characters bounced around so much you couldn't follow the plot. Clearly, if you haven't read all the books, this one isn't for you.

It's got flaws of basic film-making. Scenes going halfway through then bouncing away. Introducing last minute characters. Setting up character plots and then never pursuing them.

Making things worse, Redmayne's slurred mutter (and I usually like him) made it impossible to track.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

DubeauNov 18, 2018

Second watch + deleted scenes: FB2 is a darker movie then the first one. So, this film lacks the positive and loving emotions. It is kind of: a setup the villain movie. I didn't mind the quantity of information but I think the structure ofSecond watch + deleted scenes: FB2 is a darker movie then the first one. So, this film lacks the positive and loving emotions. It is kind of: a setup the villain movie. I didn't mind the quantity of information but I think the structure of movie wasn't fitting so well this time. The flashbacks had a tendency to broke the rhythm. Not that they were useless but the editing around it wasn't well decided. The relation between Credence and Nagani was way better with the deleted scenes. I felt it was a poor decision to cut them. I give it a 70%. I think the film has a lot of bad rhythm but it is still interesting to watch for the characters and the lore. And some of the deleted scenes bring a bit more to the table. They should have been in the movie for most of them.… Expand

9 of 14 users found this helpful95

All this user's reviews

5

JortigoMar 17, 2019

A tape that is very good but lacks the elements that made his predecessor fantastic.

7 of 8 users found this helpful71

All this user's reviews

4

alvindinoMar 11, 2019

The worst part is, after all the rotating subplots appear without a significant impression, as if the subplots are Disapparating just like that, the story doesn't really have a conclusion. This film is only felt as a bridge to deliver us toThe worst part is, after all the rotating subplots appear without a significant impression, as if the subplots are Disapparating just like that, the story doesn't really have a conclusion. This film is only felt as a bridge to deliver us to the next episode. We will not understand this watch if we do not watch the previous film, we will not get a meaningful answer before watching the next film. It's disappointing, because in terms of narration, this is an 'important' story in the history of the magic world. J.K. Rowling once again showed her ability to build a complex universe. But it seems like it's better to be booked first. As a script, it's just too much. The Potterheads will just be happy, because they have explored a deeper magical world. But as a film, this is no longer the story of Newt Scamander. This is a crimes of maxim story to turn on the franchise that should have been finished.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

6

andre27Mar 5, 2019

Fantastic Beasts e os crimes de Grindelwald não é de longe tão bom como o primeiro mas consegue ser um bom filme. Todo o envolvimento com o mundo Harry Potter é muito fixe e a história não está mal conseguida mas para este segundo filmeFantastic Beasts e os crimes de Grindelwald não é de longe tão bom como o primeiro mas consegue ser um bom filme. Todo o envolvimento com o mundo Harry Potter é muito fixe e a história não está mal conseguida mas para este segundo filme resultar era necessário mais carisma por parte do vilão e ai o filme falha completamente.Péssimo papel de Jonhy Deep. O vilão não tem carisma, personalidade, motivo, impacto e nem é assusta. Depois de um Voldmort esse Grindelwald não nada nadinha mesmo e o filme perde muito com isso.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

4

promised_mahdiMar 3, 2019

i'm confused some spells were in this movie with wide use and they weren't in harry potter series i think it's not reasonable a spin off should be loyal to its source this film isn't in addition there is a prediction in story that i reallyi'm confused some spells were in this movie with wide use and they weren't in harry potter series i think it's not reasonable a spin off should be loyal to its source this film isn't in addition there is a prediction in story that i really can't figure out its connection to grindelwald… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

0

fasztarisznyaFeb 26, 2019

This is a disgrace to everything Harry Potter. Poorly acted characters, poorly explained reasons, poor attempt at drama at every turn. Waste of time.

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

7

Mitya64Feb 23, 2019

Снято отлично. Но много разных историй и не понятно зачем они были добавлены. фильм много вопросов оставляет.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

6

buddhalouFeb 19, 2019

Outstanding production design and special effects help to create a rich and inviting universe - to tell less than captivating stories in.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

4

eagleeyevikingFeb 15, 2019

While the film is entertaining throughout its runtime, it does feel more like an exposition dump than a wizarding adventure.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

0

B_RadicalFeb 12, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I know it's way after the fact now, but I had to write a review about this movie.

Not only is it BY FAR the worst movie in the Harry Potter franchise, it's one of the worst movies I've ever seen. It really is that bad.

Anyone who says this movie made sense is out of their mind.

The screenplay was abysmal. There were characters that were woefully underdeveloped, characters that existed for only one scene, and the character's progression/actions made no sense at all. That's even to mention the fact that the story doesn't make sense. Albus had a brother that he never mentioned once in 7 HP books? Really? And if that part was all a lie then it was a gross red herring that was included just to stir controversy.

The best part of the move was Jude Law as young Dumbledore, far and away. Why this movie didn't have more of him included...I have no idea. The beasts that were included as well were fun and interesting. But those are really the only two positives from this entire movie.

It felt like JK Rowling was trying to stuff all the plot needed for the next 2 or 3 movies in the series into this one movie. No Harry Potter fan should like this movie. There is no magic or wonder attached this movie.

Really a new screenwriter or director is needed. It's clear from seeing this move that some sort of new voice is needed going forward to return these films to their roots (they should see if Alfonso Cuaron is available since Prisoner of Azkaban was the best movie.)… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

6

Jim222001Jan 30, 2019

J.K Rowling and David Yates still don’t give us much of a good reason to why these movies exist. Fans rather have more Potter. The Fantastic Beasts stories have yet to fully get off the ground. Despite a likeable cast and some magicalJ.K Rowling and David Yates still don’t give us much of a good reason to why these movies exist. Fans rather have more Potter. The Fantastic Beasts stories have yet to fully get off the ground. Despite a likeable cast and some magical moments.
The Crimes of Grindelwald is bit over-stuffed with too many characters and subplots. You also have Rowling annoying fans. By messing with the time line and having some characters introduced way too early. To how she originally wrote them.
My main problem is how they used the delightful Queenie though. Having her tempted by the dark side is like Mary Poppins tempted by the dark side. To me that worked least of all. Well that and flashbacks of Dumbledore (Jude Law) and villain Grindelwald (Johnny Depp) looking at each other in lust. To show as Dumbledore said it “they were more than friends.” Rowling has said they were an item. However on film it came off a bit goofy.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

9

silbakkerJan 17, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Fantastic film. I really liked the opening and Grindelwald's speech. Johnny Depp was amazing.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

1

PendalfJan 8, 2019

Peace of crap with poor screenplay and montage. No characters motivation, nothing moves the plot.
Grindelwald and Dumbledore are gays so kiss kiss bang bang

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

VirgonoShakaJan 7, 2019

Ugh!!! I'm starting to wonder if JK has read her own book series because at times, this felt more fanfiction (bad one) than cannon. With a story that is not even interesting, effects that are meh at best, and characters that have no purposeUgh!!! I'm starting to wonder if JK has read her own book series because at times, this felt more fanfiction (bad one) than cannon. With a story that is not even interesting, effects that are meh at best, and characters that have no purpose at all in being in the movie other than "we were in the first one" or "we appeared in the books" this movie at no point seems like something worthy of the Wizarding world, and easily takes the place as the worst so far, with its final "twist" only adding insult to injury. Apart from good music, some ok performances (Deep and Law) and some nice moments or creatures, this is a list of crimes that make the future bleak.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

5

PipeCDec 31, 2018

Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Yates and Rowling.

The fantasy cosmos the whole world fell in love with is back under the title "Wizarding World," this time around no Potter included. Mr. Newton Artemis Fido "Newt" Scamander takes up theFantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Yates and Rowling.

The fantasy cosmos the whole world fell in love with is back under the title "Wizarding World," this time around no Potter included. Mr. Newton Artemis Fido "Newt" Scamander takes up the torch, a famed Magizoologist known for being expelled from Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry, his gorgeous and naughty creatures and his duty to helm supposedly five entries.

Directed by well-known filmmaker David Yates and written by the author herself behind the books, "Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them" arrived in theaters two years ago, cooking a spin-off/prequel franchise up that got more positive than negative opinions among the stern fandom. Enjoying acceptable box office numbers both domestic and overseas and mostly positive critical reception thanks to the modest-yet-charming performance of Academy Award-winning Eddie Redmayne, wonderfully crafted visual effects, the unexplored pre-Hogwarts world, the fabulous titular beasts and mythical creatures, an enticing plot twist and the delightful journey across New York; "FBWFT" was a pleasant and far-seeing surprise that shocked us sooner rather than later.

"Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald" is the second extension set in this long-running sub-Potterverse, directed by the same director of the last four films in the original saga and penned by prolific writer J. K. Rowling. A bolt from the blue is that even with the creative backbone almost untouched, this second part happens to be a pyrotechnic and enjoyable misfire, plenty of deficiently unified sub-plots that ultimately saturate the not-so-eye-popping visual spectacle, introducing untidily so many narrative threads that, instead of complexity, utterly erode the core story.

Admittedly the dark beauty of some gigantic, messy set-pieces works not quite right because of the writing individuality, but still, by composition, they're simply bracing, as ever. Philippe Rousselot also returns as director of photography, which benefits visual cohesion as for the franchise' look and tone even when the action moves from America to Europe, mainly to Paris, France. Some shots really work, others shine, but none of them are part of the confusingly edited, overextended, strange action sequences. As usual, imagery is rich in content, not as cozy, universal and relatable as the previous ones, but at least it's impressively appealing. The titular 'fantastic' adjective is tailor-made for these beasts. The two adorable creatures who stole the show last time come back in order to edge into the spotlight with their naive behavior and mini-treatments; but it's Europe which hypnotizes with engaging animals. The Circus Arcanus holds important gears for the plot, so when madness is unleashed in the Parisian streets, it showcases a range of magnificently designed creatures who take over the screen, and therefore, the audience. Newt's traveling zoo/suitcase gives us short glimpses of unexplored habitats, in which the most prominent feature is a visually overwhelming underwater seaweed-seahorse. They monopolize a large part of the long title, but their greater and short splendor takes place only in the first act in visual terms, as story-wise, the greatest trick comes up.

Rowling's widely known for erecting fantasy worlds brimming with mythos, facing good against evil, going through an ambiguous area of grays which create beautiful, knotty stories. The primary thread here is clear and synthetic, but to strengthen it and nourish it she draws upon clumsy narrative saturation that ends up throwing an all-star cast, a few engrossing performances and some gloomy digital effects out. The script has no focus to unfold, its ambition to put too much information into a single two-hour-plus feature is atrocious; Dumbledore's true origins are only tested by giving more plot weight to Jacob Kowalski's love affair, mitigate the prominence of the beasts and deliver a worthy development to its great villain are some of the sins that neither the strongest cinematic spell achieves to break. This is a perplexing mythological disaster of endless derivations that, without the talented central figure, would have been the longest headache of this year at the movies.

"Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald" by David Yates mesmerizes us with gorgeous beasts, good performances and special re-encounters with characters from the original franchise; but a hodgepodge of overlong, untidy plots doesn't enrich the main world as it should, instead, weakens and endangers this new franchise of dissimilar entries. "The Crimes of Grindelwald" loses its magic, is darker and more tedious than its predecessor, a longueur which tries to provide emotion and thrill with wrongly placed provocative twists that the only thing they achieve is to sink progressively this magical world which is lost in a mess of sequels, spin-offs, homages and Hollywood rip-offs.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

8

marcmyworksDec 29, 2018

The Crimes of Grindelwald isn't as bad as the critics are making it out to be. Sure there is a lack of character development and it feels like the precursor to a bigger film (setup if you will) but overall its a complex and character drivenThe Crimes of Grindelwald isn't as bad as the critics are making it out to be. Sure there is a lack of character development and it feels like the precursor to a bigger film (setup if you will) but overall its a complex and character driven feast for the eyes.… Expand

5 of 6 users found this helpful51

All this user's reviews

6

DukeJonDec 27, 2018

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The first 20 minutes was the best of any Harry Potter film I've ever seen. Dark and exciting, it's a shame the rest of the movie didn't stand up to this. The movie is long, boring in long stretches, with a convoluted plot and too many characters. The CGI looks great but it's overdone - you feel as though you're being led from one over the top set piece to the next. I'm not crazy about the Harry Potter universe (unlike the people I went with) so a lot of what went on was very confusing. This isn't the film to see if you're not familiar with the franchise. Johnny Depp was ok as the villian... though he never seemed to do anything particularly villainous. The best part was when they went back to Hogwarts. Above all, a movie should stand on its own two feet, it shouldn't exist simply to set up the next movie in the series.… Expand

5 of 6 users found this helpful51

All this user's reviews

4

LivingTribunalDec 26, 2018

Johnny Depp and Jude Law did great acting, but it wasn't about Fantastic Beasts at all. There are too many holes in the story. And we can't understand most of the character's thoughts. There are too many! It makes you wait for the next film,Johnny Depp and Jude Law did great acting, but it wasn't about Fantastic Beasts at all. There are too many holes in the story. And we can't understand most of the character's thoughts. There are too many! It makes you wait for the next film, but this film itself is a shame of Harry Potter franchise.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

8

Akk3d1sDec 22, 2018

If you are a harry potter fan, then this movie is definitely worth it. Visuals and audio is a 10. Story and acting a 7.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

3

LarsoosDec 21, 2018

This movie is horrible. It's confusing, and just lazy. But I'll give credit where credit is due. The last 30 minutes of this film was okay and brings my score slightly up. But still this movie is not worth your money or your time.

7 of 11 users found this helpful74

All this user's reviews

4

MattBrady99Dec 20, 2018

“Magic blooms... only in rare souls. Still, we must skulk in shadows. But the old ways serve us no longer.”

‘Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald’ is a muddled sequel/prequel that lacks magic and wonder. The most tedious part is“Magic blooms... only in rare souls. Still, we must skulk in shadows. But the old ways serve us no longer.”

‘Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald’ is a muddled sequel/prequel that lacks magic and wonder. The most tedious part is realizing there’s going to be four more of these; something I was once comfortable with. This isn’t the type of story that inspired J.K. Rowling to start writing - no, this is a studio movie asking when the script is done.

The biggest crime this movie has ever committed is being boring.

Still, not everything is bad…

David Yates directing during the action sequences was entertaining and delivers some creative set pieces. I mean, the guy knows how to direct a big budget movie and make it look as good as it does. The production design and costumes are excellent as usual for these type of movies.

Eddie Redmayne and Dan Fogler are great once again. I believed they chemistry a lot more than first one. However, the characters themselves don’t suit this type of story, especially Jacob whose brought back without a good reason. I guess that memory wipe spell didn’t work because it only took away bad memories, yet he remembers the first world war - so why did he forget in the first? I wonder if this affects the people of New York as well.

Katherine Waterston did the best with the material she was given, which isn’t much as her character is put on autopilot. Jude Law as a youngish Dumbledore is perfect casting. Law’s shape and classy approach to the character makes his presence enthralling; too bad he’s screen time is slim.

I’m aware this opinion may spark disagreement, but I thought Johnny Depp played Grindelwald with the right charm and dangerous presence for the character to work. While I still believe Colin Farrell would’ve been perfect as this series Voldemort, because I could imagine Farrell growing into that wicked and striking villain.

And that’s really it for positives.

I gave the first movie credit for avoiding nostalgia and managing to stand on its own two feet, but now it’s trying to build a franchise without telling a good story. The movie is all over the place in terms of storytelling and narrative.

I’m not sure about you, but I was struggling to follow what was going on. I thought it was just me at first as I don’t consider myself a fan of the series or know the Wizarding World that well. It was meant for the fans who can easily follow this narrative, right? Well, to my surprise and relief, I was wrong. It’s never a good sign when hardcore fans struggle to explain the entire “plot”. Is it about Newt Scamander? How about Grindelwald?

Some of the visual effects looked pretty bad and painfully noticeable when interacting with non-digital performers. I said this once and I’ll say it again, I kinda wish there was more practical work.

Overall rating: I don’t know the fate of these movie in the future, but judging on the box office results and the critical reviews from both critics and fans alike, it’s pretty bleak. I’m sure there will be a third movie and fans will see it no matter what while holding a grudge against Rowling.

What a time to be alive.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

3

phillipchambersDec 19, 2018

The storyline and screenplay were pretty poor. There are some highlights of characterization (plucky comic relief etc). And I'm pretty tired of Johnny Depp doing a quirky characterization. After a while it becomes 'overacting'.

5 of 9 users found this helpful54

All this user's reviews

7

imthenoobDec 18, 2018

Law and Depp were perfectly cast and really shine is the sadly small amount of the film they are featured in. The film, as a whole, is pretty decent but it features way too many subplots and I mean WAY too many. And there's so muchLaw and Depp were perfectly cast and really shine is the sadly small amount of the film they are featured in. The film, as a whole, is pretty decent but it features way too many subplots and I mean WAY too many. And there's so much information crammed into this movie that it seems like they are quickly jumping from one thing to the next without really letting us digest what we have seen. It's a little annoying but I think that there are plenty of parts, especially the ending and the scenes with Law and Depp, that more than make up for the shortcomings.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

1

RudygerDec 16, 2018

I didn't like the first movie (I fell asleep in the theater and had to watch it again on TV). But I wanted to like this one, I really wanted. What a letdown! What I hated about this movie:
- The pace: soooooo boring. Damn, I almost fellI didn't like the first movie (I fell asleep in the theater and had to watch it again on TV). But I wanted to like this one, I really wanted. What a letdown! What I hated about this movie:
- The pace: soooooo boring. Damn, I almost fell asleep again. Twice! - The plot: One major flaw of the first movie was the characters. People generally liked Newt and Tina, but hated Queenie, Jacob and Creedance. In this movie, here we go again. 3/4 of the movie is dedicated to Creedance backstory and Jacob/Queenie "complicated" relationship.
- So many useless subplots: soooo many backstories, sooooo many red herrings.
- The acting: I didn't see Grindelwald. I saw Johnny Depp with a ton of makeup. - Fanservice: Oh, god, the fanservice is so heavy in this one. The plot is so unnecessary convoluted, stretched and boring, they had to put a million references to the HP universe, so that people can be excited. "Look! It's the guy from HP" / "Look! It's that stuff from HP"...

In conclusion, the fantastic beasts saga is The Hobbit of Harry Potter. Boring prequels filled with streched boring plot and a ton of fanservice.… Expand

5 of 10 users found this helpful55

All this user's reviews

0

LulzTVDec 14, 2018

I payed money for nothing.
I am actualy so goddamn dissapointed. The trashest of all the Harry Potter movies. It completely trashed over the charm of the other movies in the franchise. I am standing right now in the teather and writing thisI payed money for nothing.
I am actualy so goddamn dissapointed. The trashest of all the Harry Potter movies. It completely trashed over the charm of the other movies in the franchise. I am standing right now in the teather and writing this review because of pure boredom. This movie is absolute non sense. 93838293939393929929292f###thismovie38388383828% is unnecesary talking, cheesiness. It's like I am watching an Indian TV show with a big budget. But! BUT Indian TV shows are so bad they are kinda entertaining. This piece of **** is pure boredom. This "movie" ( more like an audio visual product xd )
is pure laziness and incompetence. Terrible pacing, lazy ass writing, 39393993939398asdgahshdhdh% of the characters are useless pieces of cardboard, 399393939% of the movie is filler, 0.000000000000000001% of the movie is the actual plot if I can even call it a plot. And one really weird thing that this movie tries to do is to show you visuals and try to impress you. Oh look flying candles uuuuuh impressive. Oh look magical explosions awesomeeee!!!!! Oh look a giant japanese creature ooooooh so amazing. Who the f### cares about visual effects when you got 0 characterization, 0 unique or strong characters. This audio visual product is an incomprehensible mess. Now the movie is coming close to the climax and I still haven't understood anything. Ps: Grindelwald was a trash just trash villain.… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

2

ThatOneNerdyGuyDec 14, 2018

Absolute snore fest this was i wish i could appreciate the FX but either color grading is god awful or my theater has a bad projector, it's honestly hardcore fan service.

5 of 9 users found this helpful54

All this user's reviews

0

EliOli123Dec 14, 2018

It was only a matter of time before the Wizarding World would turn into a full blown left wing propaganda machine. In this movie we see the foundation being laid. I am personally tired of seeing "progressive" preaching woven into myIt was only a matter of time before the Wizarding World would turn into a full blown left wing propaganda machine. In this movie we see the foundation being laid. I am personally tired of seeing "progressive" preaching woven into my entertainment. I go to the movies to be entertained, not indoctrinated. This movie will be my last journey into the Wizarding World.… Expand

4 of 10 users found this helpful46

All this user's reviews

10

JaninedeamDec 10, 2018

It was a wonderful movie for Potter' fans, JK made some mistakes with the rhythm of the movie, but very entertaining. I wished more story line for Grindelwald and Dumbledore Better than the first one.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

4

PepsiJamieDec 10, 2018

I'm giving this 4 stars ONLY because the FX were stellar and the acting was good. The storyline is confusing at best, irresponsible and offensive to HP fans at worst. It's as if your reading a "choose your own adventure" book from cover toI'm giving this 4 stars ONLY because the FX were stellar and the acting was good. The storyline is confusing at best, irresponsible and offensive to HP fans at worst. It's as if your reading a "choose your own adventure" book from cover to cover.

Like many others, I have read and watched all the Harry Potter films numerous times. I have enjoyed them immensely and consider them an incredible asset to literature. In my opinion J.K. Rowling, Warner Brothers and David Yates should be ashamed for creating such a jumbled mess and associating it with Harry Potter. If Warner Brothers was smart they'd start over and actually READ the script before making another costly, bewildering and unworthy film that is in any way associated with the Harry Potter franchize.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

10

danghuong180894Dec 10, 2018

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I love characters, i love music, i love visual effect in this film. So i love FANTASTIC BEASTS: THE CRIMES OF GRINDELWALD… Expand

5 of 9 users found this helpful54

All this user's reviews

10

xemrapDec 10, 2018

I just like this film. Because it really fantastic, i don't understand many people were voted too low score.

5 of 14 users found this helpful59

All this user's reviews

9

DrRossGellerDec 9, 2018

Another one of those that critics got wrong. Superior to FBAWTFT that I love. This is a much denser, different and complex film. It moves fast (I guess too fast for some), paced like a thriller as Yates and Heyman said, it's frequentlyAnother one of those that critics got wrong. Superior to FBAWTFT that I love. This is a much denser, different and complex film. It moves fast (I guess too fast for some), paced like a thriller as Yates and Heyman said, it's frequently magical and awe inspiring. I was in from the very first shot (fantastic opening set piece by the way). Wasn't bothered or didn't see any of the flaws cited by some. It seems fairly obvious that quite a few elements in there will be lost on non fans, but really, why would you see this film if you're not a HP fan or at the very least, a fan of Fantastic Beasts & Where To Find Them?! It's gorgeously shot by Phillipe Rousselot, beautifully directed by David Yates as always, impeccably acted (Johnny Depp puts in one of his finest performances to date, Law is superb, some intriguing new additions, and the main cast is as excellent as ever), it's also shocking at times, intriguing, mysterious.

I don't care about the naysayers, JK is delivering what she's been wanting to tell for a while, and she does an excellent job at that. It's at times whimsical, magical, gorgeous (Mirror Of Erised scene, Hogwarts), powerful, mesmerizing (the third act).

I'm positively elated to see what JK has in store for the next three films and for us to get the full picture as this is after all the middle film, or middle part of a five part story. The ending is indeed jaw dropping and I'm sure that she has all the answers as she's proven before on HP and all will make sense in due time.… Expand

3 of 12 users found this helpful39

All this user's reviews

4

katieleigh422Dec 8, 2018

If only I could differentiate my rating based on whether I liked watching it vs. whether I thought it was a good movie. Admittedly, I have no objectivity regarding the Wizarding World and will enjoy every moment you let me get my eyeballs onIf only I could differentiate my rating based on whether I liked watching it vs. whether I thought it was a good movie. Admittedly, I have no objectivity regarding the Wizarding World and will enjoy every moment you let me get my eyeballs on it. But this movie was a mess and had plotholes and questionable character points all over the place. See it if you love the Wizarding World -- those of you who do will likely get more out of it than you did the first in this series. But was it a good movie? Not really.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

4

GrantD243Dec 8, 2018

Oof. Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald is a perfect example of how a film can suffer from being the middle child in a planned trilogy. This whole film is just setting up the third film. What little story development there is isOof. Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald is a perfect example of how a film can suffer from being the middle child in a planned trilogy. This whole film is just setting up the third film. What little story development there is is largely unsatisfying, and a lot of this film is just...boring. It also had an odd flow to it and feels pretty clunky at times.

Newt is still one of my favorite characters in the Harry Potter universe, but he deserves a better story. I hope the third film makes up for this.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

3

FeudDec 5, 2018

A complete chaos of a film. J.K.Rowling try to cram so much **** in here that it all seems inconsequential or just fanservice. There are so many new characters that I just don't care about and when they've just briefly introced them theyA complete chaos of a film. J.K.Rowling try to cram so much **** in here that it all seems inconsequential or just fanservice. There are so many new characters that I just don't care about and when they've just briefly introced them they start to tell their backstories and expect me to care about it. Another thing that annoyed me was that there was so much cgi smoke. Apart from the amazing creatures in this movie, I found it to be boring and a complete mess.… Expand

3 of 8 users found this helpful35

All this user's reviews

2

hzsvitaminDec 7, 2018

As a huge Harry Potter Wizarding World fan I am very disappointed in this movie. It doesn`t possess the charm of the original, the actors are taking themselves waaay to seriously, Grindelwald played by J.D is too mild. Dumbledore played byAs a huge Harry Potter Wizarding World fan I am very disappointed in this movie. It doesn`t possess the charm of the original, the actors are taking themselves waaay to seriously, Grindelwald played by J.D is too mild. Dumbledore played by J.L is like a completely different person than who we got to know in Harry Potter. He is very serious, muggle-fashionable pretty boy that has no charizma whatsoever. I didn`t think Jude Law was gonna bring Dumbledore, and he didn`t. Dear makers of this movie: You can`t cast an actor just because he has piercing blue eyes!!!! Cast an appropriate actor that can bring the characte r and put some contact lenses into his eyes for pete`s sake!

And the fashion. Why are the wizards and witches fashionable? The Harry Potter books talk about how the magical people clearly don`t get muggle clothing and they cannot blend in. The first original movies showed this beautifully, with fantastic and exciting costume design. How come in the Fantastic Beasts movies they do not wear robes and hats anymore? Where are the robes and hats???

The story line is a mess, I have absolutely no idea what it was about. This movie is cleary just a money maker, and as a fan of her I have to say, J. K. Rowling should be ashamed of herself for selling out like this.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

4

IrisenDec 6, 2018

Crimes of Grindelwald is a disappointment of a movie. I can't say it's bad because it's redeemed by some of its aspects, like its visuals (the Archives scenes is very entertaining to watch) and the sheer nostalgia factor (If you've seen it,Crimes of Grindelwald is a disappointment of a movie. I can't say it's bad because it's redeemed by some of its aspects, like its visuals (the Archives scenes is very entertaining to watch) and the sheer nostalgia factor (If you've seen it, you know what I'm talking about) but it still remains disappointing. The plot is boring, the characters are either butchered in their development or incredibly flat. The stories are convoluted, it's as if JK tried to cram in as much story elements and new characters as she could and the end result is a bloated, confused mess. The only reason I'm not giving this a worse rating is the aspects I've mentionned before and Jude Law's Dumbledore, who's pretty hot (ngl), and I'm weak for that kind of stuff.
The last plot twist gave me the urge to throw myself in the nearest river. I never want to see that movie again but I still remain hopeful for the sequel, and I really hope that JKR can get better at writing for movies.… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews