Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them

7

yezoNov 19, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This movie is okay, a lot of expectations from the movie but I was not as satisfied. The plot is ok. Some CGI is good, some is pathetic, particularly at the end, the farewell of Newt and the thunder bird, the CGI is so bad.
A lot of stuff was not quite make sense, I feel like there was a bit of rush about the orphanage, and constant cut scenes from Newt and Tina then to orphanage does not quite connect. At the end, I kinda of feel like Grindelwald might show up base on those newspaper headlines earlier. But Johnny Depp, wtf, I was expecting someone from Bulgaria or Russia.
The aims and objective for Grindelwald is not well explained, and c'mon man, the greatest dark wizard at that time, got defeated in no time.
But I have to declare I have not read the book yet.… Expand

5 of 8 users found this helpful53

All this user's reviews

7

Jess_HillNov 21, 2016

This is a well crafted film with a dark edge and excellent creature design. Though long, it's well paced and doesn't drag, and the storyline is engaging and endearing, with the social commentary lacking subtlety but adding depth. TheThis is a well crafted film with a dark edge and excellent creature design. Though long, it's well paced and doesn't drag, and the storyline is engaging and endearing, with the social commentary lacking subtlety but adding depth. The performances are considered and generally polished, with Redmayne excellent as is to be expected. Definitely one for older children, this was better than I was expecting. 7.86/10… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

CineAutoctonoJan 16, 2020

"Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them"was a movie that although had little enchantress of the Harry Potter´s franchise was a really entertraining movie with new an interesting characters and characteristic magic action, that only the"Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them"was a movie that although had little enchantress of the Harry Potter´s franchise was a really entertraining movie with new an interesting characters and characteristic magic action, that only the Wizarding World of J.K. Rowling could bring.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

valgov291May 1, 2017

This movie was a fun ride. Aside from a couple plot device solutions and an ambiguous hold on the climactic creature they battle at thee end obliterating everything in its path and then dying very easily the movie was worth watching and IThis movie was a fun ride. Aside from a couple plot device solutions and an ambiguous hold on the climactic creature they battle at thee end obliterating everything in its path and then dying very easily the movie was worth watching and I look forward to a sequel.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

RobBob99Nov 27, 2016

A solid start to this new franchise, the World Building and establishing the Wizarding World in America was the most dynamic part of this film. Fantastic Beasts proved to be a weird movie to judge, there wasn't anything exceptional about theA solid start to this new franchise, the World Building and establishing the Wizarding World in America was the most dynamic part of this film. Fantastic Beasts proved to be a weird movie to judge, there wasn't anything exceptional about the movie, at the same time there wasn't anything bad about it either. Fantastic Beasts proved to be a fun movie with two solid performances from Eddie Redmayne and Colin Farrell.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

7

EpicLadySpongeNov 18, 2016

This spin-off of the Harry Potter franchise isn't what everyone was expecting to see, but just for the benefit of it, Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them builds a feeling connected to the original Harry Potter books and/or movies and theThis spin-off of the Harry Potter franchise isn't what everyone was expecting to see, but just for the benefit of it, Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them builds a feeling connected to the original Harry Potter books and/or movies and the spirit lives on.… Expand

12 of 18 users found this helpful126

All this user's reviews

7

masamunerikuNov 25, 2016

Fantastic beasts is a movie that tries to be several things at once. It tells the story about catching beasts and about the wizardry world in the US. Even though it manages to do both it does not excel at one.

The disparate story between theFantastic beasts is a movie that tries to be several things at once. It tells the story about catching beasts and about the wizardry world in the US. Even though it manages to do both it does not excel at one.

The disparate story between the two aspects results in uneven pacing in the storytelling. The first half focuses on the beast catching while the rest is about the issues surrounding the world of US wizardry. In the end none is completely fleshed out.

This movie is also heavily character driven due to the light plot. The characters in the movie are hit-or-misses. Some may like them while other may find the main characters to be ditzy and at times *oblivious*. The villains feel cookie-cutter and superficial as the story never dives deeper into them. The movie is a treat for HP fans as it expands the HP universe complete with references to original HP world. Others who find the characters likable and enjoy a light plot on wizards and imaginary beasts will find it worth the admission and time.

---
In my opinion they should've made Fantastic Beasts as a TV series focusing on 'beasts' while the story on US wizardry world should be a standalone movie with a more substantial plot.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

7

AndrewLambertJan 22, 2017

Fantastic Beasts is a intriguing return to the wizarding world, introducing a vastly different universe to explore and some memorably offbeat characters to go with it, in addition to a darker side of the genre that was never explored to itsFantastic Beasts is a intriguing return to the wizarding world, introducing a vastly different universe to explore and some memorably offbeat characters to go with it, in addition to a darker side of the genre that was never explored to its full capability in the Potter movies. That being said, the movie struggles to focus on a coherent storyline and by the time we reach its climax, Beasts has almost totally derailed itself, and the sacrifice of its greatest character in Farrell for the severely waning talents of Depp as Grindelwald feels like a fatal mistake for the remainder of the series.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

SrPepeJan 3, 2018

Un buen comienzo de lo que espero que sea una gran trilogía. No es la gran cosa pero emociona ver en que se puede convertir.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Muskrat147Nov 18, 2016

With incredible special effects and exceptional performances, Fantastic Beasts figures out how to stand up all on its own, even if it feels like somewhat of a set-up for future installments.

9 of 13 users found this helpful94

All this user's reviews

7

JyroJyroSep 19, 2017

It's a weird blend of childish silliness and gritty seriousness but it just about fits. A charming world with an array of equally charming (and uncomplicated) characters.

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

7

eva3si0nOct 29, 2018

Spin-off I didn't wait for the main series. Having seen a trailer, I have understood that Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them is created first of all on new younger generation. It is some kind of first movie of the saga. Naturally thisSpin-off I didn't wait for the main series. Having seen a trailer, I have understood that Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them is created first of all on new younger generation. It is some kind of first movie of the saga. Naturally this movie doesn't come within miles of any part of the original saga. He reminds the parody to the original more. But the parody has turned out good, first of all because all have missed the world created by Rowling. On the other hand it is the excellent family movie with excellent CGI. Initially I waited smaller from this spin-off.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Maggie0908hsuDec 2, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. There're endless possibilities for JK Rowling and her magic world. I do love them, while this movie should be about the beasts, but in fact it spent too much time on dark magic. When the dark shadows came out, I just couldn't help think of the movie "Mama".… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

7

JPKJun 14, 2019

Decent Prequel
Fantastic Beasts is pretty boring in it's first 25 minutes, But it starts to get fun after that point even though it lacks the magic of the Potter films.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

CoreGamer1408Feb 13, 2022

Eco warrior movie, but not in a bad way or heavy handed way. A wizard with a portable nature reserve in the shape of a (no spoilers). It is all rather simple in it's story tellling. Like abuse people/nature and they maybe become monsters. TheEco warrior movie, but not in a bad way or heavy handed way. A wizard with a portable nature reserve in the shape of a (no spoilers). It is all rather simple in it's story tellling. Like abuse people/nature and they maybe become monsters. The story sets up good personal stakes with mostly good pay offs that actually works rather. With endearing characters to root for. The ending I found rather bitter sweet. What is life, but a bunch of memories and to lose memories is to life imo.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

luke100Jan 11, 2018

The plot is really stupid sometimes, and the subplot of magical creatures feels a bit forced, but it's characters and themes are captivating, and the visuals keep your eyes glued to the screen. It's not perfect, but it has me hugely excitedThe plot is really stupid sometimes, and the subplot of magical creatures feels a bit forced, but it's characters and themes are captivating, and the visuals keep your eyes glued to the screen. It's not perfect, but it has me hugely excited for the sequels.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

SoulWarfareMay 16, 2021

Magic Cash-Cow: and How to Milk It.

It's not quite as magical or amazing as Harry Potter but there is definitely something there.

This is a good start to a new story in the Magical World of Harry Potter. Hopefully, sequels don't let it down.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

RaduAMar 16, 2019

72/100

It's a decent fantasy movie. The biggest problem I have with the movie is the villain, super predictable ... The acting is ok (I liked Eddie Redmayne). The CGI is OK (this cloud looks terrible). The story is ok (I was not a72/100

It's a decent fantasy movie.
The biggest problem I have with the movie is the villain, super predictable ...
The acting is ok (I liked Eddie Redmayne).
The CGI is OK (this cloud looks terrible).
The story is ok (I was not a big fan of Harry Potter so I can not compare it).
In conclusion, this movie is ok ...… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

clarkaddisonNov 15, 2018

If you are a massive Potter head, and havent seen this which would be a shock, then go watch it. Otherwise most audience members may not like it. It`s a period movie, as in it happens in another time of the world, it`s a magic movie. To startIf you are a massive Potter head, and havent seen this which would be a shock, then go watch it. Otherwise most audience members may not like it. It`s a period movie, as in it happens in another time of the world, it`s a magic movie. To start a 5 movie or so franchise you could have done better. But it was still a blast to back into the wizarding world… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

pur__0_0__Jun 15, 2021

I have just finished watching the movie on Prime Video and everything is absolutely fresh in my mind right now. I had no idea what I was going in for. I didn't read the original book or watch any trailer before seeing this movie. All I hadI have just finished watching the movie on Prime Video and everything is absolutely fresh in my mind right now. I had no idea what I was going in for. I didn't read the original book or watch any trailer before seeing this movie. All I had heard was that this takes place in the same universe as Harry Potter, which is why I watched it. And honestly speaking, this movie is nothing different from what I expected it would be.

The problem with this movie is that it's very, very cliched. It uses those exact plot points that make an annoying movie, well, annoying. That's literally how this movie begins: Making an annoying creature do things for which the protagonist gets in trouble. This is just like how Dobby was in The Chamber of Secrets, except over there he was doing it because he had been asked to do so. The marsupial mole over here wasn't doing it for any particular reason at all, except for being cringy. If I were Newt I'd have just let him get caught and die.

And then of course, Newt is unregistered. The way the movie began made it seem like Newt was a complete idiot, except that the whole point behind his character is that he's smart. He's the only one person who cares about the beasts of the magical world unlike the zoophobic wizards. Every species in this whole movie - muggles, wizards, magical creatures - everyone was unlikeable. They all did things which made me want them to get their comeuppance.

The only thing that saved this movie for me was the world building. I have heard that the book is actually a guidebook for all the creatures living in their universe. So this, being an adaptation, was the only good part in the entire movie. And it was so beautiful that I enjoyed this otherwise irritating movie. I really wish that was the main focus of the movie instead of them being about fugitives running from the law and something something Ezra Miller.

Another thing I really liked about this movie is the depiction of the 1920's America. All the characters looked like they belonged in that age. The ignorant, hateful behaviour of the people from that time was very well depicted, if that was intentional. The acting was great. People reacted just like how they would if the CGI was present before them in real life.

Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them is a movie that seems to be more oriented for a young audience, since they are the ones who will find it more appealing. It has cool and cute animals, funny scenes, childish storyline and overall the 90's and early 00's vibe to it. It's a one time watch for the adults, since the only good thing to offer for a mature audience is the phenomenal CGI. It won't remain as interesting if watched for a second time, which is why I'd recommend you to not ruin the experience by watching it for the second time.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

iCampoRamilMay 18, 2022

Interesante de ver, sobre todo por la parte de ver magia en la vida cotidiana, aunque justo en ese apartado se queda algo cortita de más, al incluir a tantas bestias fantásticas. Buen preludio para algo que puede molar bastante. En generalInteresante de ver, sobre todo por la parte de ver magia en la vida cotidiana, aunque justo en ese apartado se queda algo cortita de más, al incluir a tantas bestias fantásticas. Buen preludio para algo que puede molar bastante. En general está todo muy bien cuidado y no presenta ningún fallo demasiado a destacar.

· Cosas buenas: el nuevo universo que presentan, los efectos especiales, el ritmo, los nuevos personajes me encantan, sobre todo Newt, y ese toque más oscuro y adulto me pica la curiosidad.
· Cosas malas: el desenlace no me convenció de todo, y lo dicho antes, hay poquita magia.
· Conclusión: es como Harry Potter pero con un toque fresco, un buen comienzo.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Gamzguy17Aug 21, 2021

While it is clumsy and a tad confusing in telling its story, "Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them" succeeds at providing more characters, folklore, backstories, and (of course) beasts for the beloved Muggle/Wizarding world this film hasWhile it is clumsy and a tad confusing in telling its story, "Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them" succeeds at providing more characters, folklore, backstories, and (of course) beasts for the beloved Muggle/Wizarding world this film has spun-off of. With proper care and attention, this has the potential to become a series that is just as enjoyable and magical as its big brother series. As is, this mature and dark story is one where both fans and general audiences will be equally entertained. Oh, and it's good to see you back in the director's chair Mr. Yates!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

JJ2FAS4UJan 4, 2022

----------------------------------6.7/10-----------------------------------

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

CoolBRSep 2, 2023

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. 7.5/10.

As a Harry Potter fan, I liked this movie, especially the first half which focuses on showing how the "American Harry Potter world" works, with some funny scenes of the MC against the police when it looks like he is trying to steal a bank and some relaxing slice of life scenes of a wizarding house. The second half is less likable, it is just a crazy escape from the American Ministry then a crazy battle and since all things are literally "magic" it isn't very solid plot IMO, especially the ending (how they magically obliviate the whole city memory).… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Fixer84Mar 16, 2023

The only one in the Fantastic Beasts saga to really be Fantastic Beasts and to appear at least interesting.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

smijatovDec 11, 2016

As a Harry Potter fan since the pre-film Harry Potter times, I was clearly extremely excited about the expansion of the magical world that I had come accustomed to explore in the film theatre. The awe-inspiring creativity and ability toAs a Harry Potter fan since the pre-film Harry Potter times, I was clearly extremely excited about the expansion of the magical world that I had come accustomed to explore in the film theatre. The awe-inspiring creativity and ability to project a completely new world onto the screen was what kept on bringing me and millions others back year after year to watch the next installment of the Harry Potter saga.
However, this is a new saga, and, unfortunately, as the reviewer from Entertainment Weekly aptly described, this one seems "numbingly inconsequential." Do not get me wrong, this is not a bad film. But it is not a *good* film either. It is just fine. And that is disappointing. I found it hard to get into the story for the first hour or so. It just did not grab my attention, despite of all the action going on. Later on, I did find myself engrossed in the film, but that was not quite enough. The darkness that the HP films went to by the end is well maintained here. The visuals are beautiful. The CGI is amazing and even a notch better than the last couple of Harry Potter films. There is nothing wrong per se. It is just lacking an emotional connection. And that may be because it is compared to Harry Potter and if we are holding the film to that standard, it never will live up to it. It just cannot. The most redeeming factor for me was the feeling that it was very appropriate to have such a bleak view of the U.S. in the wake of Donald Trump's election. While this was overall not quite as exciting nor engaging as I had hoped it would be, it did set a stage with enough unknowns about this new wizarding world of the U.S. that it will probably easily give itself to the other 4 sequels. Maybe they will develop this emotional connection that this first installment failed to achieve.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

BikerjamesMay 11, 2017

I have enjoyed Eddie Redmayne in films, but he lacks personality in this one. He has little dialogue throughout the movie, and Dan Fogler steals every scene he is in with him. Colin Farrell's bad guy Percival doesn't have enough characterI have enjoyed Eddie Redmayne in films, but he lacks personality in this one. He has little dialogue throughout the movie, and Dan Fogler steals every scene he is in with him. Colin Farrell's bad guy Percival doesn't have enough character development, and also seems a little one note. One thing you can tell the filmmakers spent a LOT of time on is the special effects, because it's a special effects extravaganza. Because of that it does give a sense of wonder and made me enjoy the film enough to recommend it. I just wish I cared about the characters more.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

Whatever12345Nov 18, 2016

This movie doesn't live up to the expectations of the first Harry Potter movies but it's fun. Visuals are great and interesting however movie suffers from the lack of the self identity. It wants to be a movie for kids at the beginning butThis movie doesn't live up to the expectations of the first Harry Potter movies but it's fun. Visuals are great and interesting however movie suffers from the lack of the self identity. It wants to be a movie for kids at the beginning but then it turns in a dark story which was quite unsettelling. As if you wanted to see a lighthearted fantasy movie about sorcery but the tone shifts to the last two HP movies in the end and leaves you with a strange feeling of "well you could avoid that and this and it would be still a great movie". I also had a hard time finding likable characters except Colin Farrell - the only guy who really did a great job here. Other characters were pretty weak and didn't deserve much attention. Overall it is a good but overhyped movie that worth watching.… Expand

5 of 17 users found this helpful512

All this user's reviews

6

Compi24Oct 4, 2019

After the undoubtedly impressive, decade long, multi-director triumph that was the first eight films of the Harry Potter franchise, Warner Bros. -- in classic Hollywood studio fashion -- decided to capitalize further on the IP by goingAfter the undoubtedly impressive, decade long, multi-director triumph that was the first eight films of the Harry Potter franchise, Warner Bros. -- in classic Hollywood studio fashion -- decided to capitalize further on the IP by going backwards in both time and, well, a lot of other things too. Considering the film we have here, coupled with the fact that J.K. Rowling assumed sole scripting responsibilities this time around, it comes to no surprise that die hards have evoked the Prequels (yes, that's "Prequels" with a capital "P," as you know exactly what's being referred to) as a comparison piece. This film takes the stately and quaint priggishness out of what we all understand the Wizarding World of Harry Potter to be, and yet somehow makes it all lesser in terms of appeal? Maybe it's the lack of British accents. Or maybe it's the pedestrian nature of the world in play, considered in hand with the disjointed narrative, incomplete character work, and confounding lore. On second thought, maybe it was the British accents. All kidding aside, however, this really didn't feel like a Harry Potter movie to me. Now, that doesn't mean the whole movie is bad or otherwise unwatchable. But it is most definitely an inferior product. With the lush history, legendary world-building, and -- honestly -- more impressive effects of the previous eight films in mind, I feel as though I've already seen the light when it comes to anything involving this universe. And while that light was shaped like a proud and stolid stag, "Fantastic Beasts'" light remains in the shape of a. . .what the hell was that platypus-looking thing called again?… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

foxgroveNov 18, 2016

'Don't do anything that's predictable' states Eddie Redmayne's bizarrely named Newt Scamader, a piece of advice that the movie itself was never going to follow. And therein lies the problem with this formulaic, but not unlikeable Potter spin'Don't do anything that's predictable' states Eddie Redmayne's bizarrely named Newt Scamader, a piece of advice that the movie itself was never going to follow. And therein lies the problem with this formulaic, but not unlikeable Potter spin off. The trouble with these franchises or big blockbuster films is that they are all just constantly rehashing old story lines or ideas to the extent that one often knows before viewing exactly what will be on offer. This lack of originality began to pall ages ago for the casual viewer, but as freshness and surprises are no longer considerations maybe even the faithful fan will become bored with all the repetition.
Still, I'm sure the plentiful supply of Potter stalwarts will lap it up and, in fairness, it is actually a better film than some of those were. Eddie Redmayne follows up on his Oscar nominated roles in 'The Theory of Everything' and 'The Danish Girl' with a somewhat limp and inattentive performance, or maybe that's just the character he plays. Whichever, he doesn't impress. Far better is the supporting turn of Dan Fogler as prospective Baker Jacob Kowalski who gets unwittingly caught up in the world of magic and fantastic creatures. One scene involving him is actually very moving. The film cannot be faulted at all on its visual effects and Art-Direction. They often take one's breath away and are constantly eye catching. Both crafts go a long way in sustaining interest in a so-so story. Also prominently drawing attention, although not for the same reason, is the rather dark cinematography. Whilst the script's tone is intentionally sombre, dealing with wizards and magic as it does, the 3D visuals of the print under review are frequently so colourless that I had to remove my glasses on more than a few occasions in order to check that this effect was intentional. This aside, however, as franchises go you could do a lot worse than to commit to this initial instalment. As for the promised four sequels, I suppose we'll have to wait and see.… Expand

7 of 20 users found this helpful713

All this user's reviews

6

Movie1997Dec 13, 2016

For someone that is really into the Harry Potter universe, I was actually kind of excited for this movie. However, the movie was simply enjoyable, but nothing special. I'll start off with some positives. First off, I was intrigued with theFor someone that is really into the Harry Potter universe, I was actually kind of excited for this movie. However, the movie was simply enjoyable, but nothing special. I'll start off with some positives. First off, I was intrigued with the concept of having to recapture the beasts. The beasts were very unique and interesting to watch. As much as I personally do not like Eddie Redmayne as an actor, I thought he was fine as Newt Scamander. Nothing special, but serviceable. I really enjoyed Dan Folger as Kowalski, or the no-maj as he's referred to in the movie. I liked seeing him really get caught up in this world and forming this awkward friendship with Newt Scamander. At the same time, I also found his relationship with the character of Queenie to be even more interesting than I could have possibly imagined. Most importantly, despite the movies numerous "Lord of the Rings" like endings, what happens to Kowalski at the end of the movie honestly left me touched. However, the movie has quite a bit of flaws. The movie suffers from pacing issues. Some scenes played out better than others. The whole Ezra Miller storyline didn't really captivate me and felt as if it was from a completely different movie. But the biggest reveal in the movie, while truly surprising, didn't feel needed in any way, shape or form. If you've seen the movie, you will definitely know what I am talking about. And the ending itself went on way too damn long. Like I mentioned before, I like what happened with the no-maj character, but everything else happening at the end simply did not need to happen. There were definitely two movies going on at the same time, which was very distracting. At the same time, I cared about our main protagonists and wanted to learn more about them, which is why I ended up enjoying the movie in the long run. Overall, for a messy movie, it still provides some interesting new additions to this movie universe that fans will not be disappointed with. I give "Fantastic Beasts" a B-!… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

6

dtlNov 19, 2016

A generally enjoyable film, it looks good (but not great) and the cast works well together. The story on the other hand seemed often aimless and overly bogged down. Honestly, I don't understand why this is the story they decided to go withA generally enjoyable film, it looks good (but not great) and the cast works well together. The story on the other hand seemed often aimless and overly bogged down. Honestly, I don't understand why this is the story they decided to go with when expanding the Harry Potter world. That said, the story was neither overly confusing nor overly simple, and I expect that Rowling could do a good job in future scripts. The world itself seemed well put together, if a bit off-putting. Rowling doesn't seem to find much to like in her vision of American Wizardry, though I imagine in future movies we would find more nuance in that area. Additionally, I am not a fan of period pieces, and those who do may find it slightly more enjoyable.… Expand

1 of 6 users found this helpful15

All this user's reviews

6

TheMetacritiqerNov 19, 2016

It's nothing compared to the best Harry Potters. What about the not so good ones? I forget, I saw them years ago. Theirs no sense of mystery or punch to the confrontations. And it could be a little shorter. It takes way too long to end. A lotIt's nothing compared to the best Harry Potters. What about the not so good ones? I forget, I saw them years ago. Theirs no sense of mystery or punch to the confrontations. And it could be a little shorter. It takes way too long to end. A lot of it is a comedy that's not funny. Except for the platypus creature in the beginning when he's shaked and all the gold comes out his pouch. But I did actually like Katherine Waterston's character. Four more of these? Ridiculous.… Expand

1 of 6 users found this helpful15

All this user's reviews

6

papeadojhonJul 19, 2018

There are glitters of inventiveness and potential throughout, although it doesn't quite mesh very well in this appealing yet inconsistent start of a franchise.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

6

romanontherunNov 18, 2016

The first part of the movie is kinda fun, lighthearted and enjoyable
Second part movie turn into some dark and uncanny territory. This felt odd and unnecessary - I wish movie was only about beast and how to find them (ironic, isn't it?) notThe first part of the movie is kinda fun, lighthearted and enjoyable
Second part movie turn into some dark and uncanny territory. This felt odd and unnecessary - I wish movie was only about beast and how to find them (ironic, isn't it?) not late-potter dark magic themes.… Expand

5 of 17 users found this helpful512

All this user's reviews

6

MattBrady99Nov 25, 2016

"Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them" is a cute, funny, and enchanting film that I had a lot of fun with.

It doesn't cheat itself by using nostalgic or references to win you over. It manages stands on it's own feet and give us a fresh"Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them" is a cute, funny, and enchanting film that I had a lot of fun with.

It doesn't cheat itself by using nostalgic or references to win you over. It manages stands on it's own feet and give us a fresh look of the wizarding world. That's the biggest praise I can give to this movie, as you can watch this without any acknowledgment of the Harry Potter films and you still know what's going on. I know fans will embrace this spin-off and rightly so.

Eddie Redmayne was excellent as Newt Scamander. He's likable, engaging, and has a very distinct personality. The same goes to Dan Fogler as Jacob Kowalski who isn't the annoying sidekick that I thought he was going to be. He added a lot to this film, which is the laughter and heart to the story. Come to my surprise, his character towards the end was the most emotional part of the film.

The rest of the cast were pretty solid and I can easily see fans falling in love with the characters.

Katherine Waterston was good as Tina, who's investigating the strange things that's going on in New York City.

When I said that Fogler brought the laughter and emotion to the story - well Colin Farrell (Percival Graves) and Ezra Miller (Credence) brought the dramatic elements. Both of their scenes I found pretty intense and was more interested in that story-line.

David Yates can be a hit or miss for me. (*COUGH COUGH* "The Legend of Tarzan" *COUGH COUGH*). I did like "Order of the Phoenix" and "Deathly Hallows: Part 2". The other's on the another hand, not so much. But I can say this about Yates, he understands the universe very well and him returning to direct must feel like home to him. While the action scenes are basic and duels aren't that special, but the best part & the main focus are the characters.

My issues with the film are mostly with the effect's, editing mistakes, and the heavy exposition scenes.

I kinda wish there was more practical work with none-effect characters. Like the Goblins or Elves didn't have to be cgi and could've easily had make-up on. Because the effect's for them looked fake and pretty bad which is unfortunate to say. It really did stick out and not in a good way.

Overall rating: There's plenty of room for improvement for "Fantastic Beasts", but the flaws didn't stop me from enjoying the film. And I don't mind that there's gonna be five of these. Seriously, I don't mind at all.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

Jill_SandwichFeb 23, 2019

A popcorn flick at the level of Transformers in that it's gimmicky, has no specific age target it's trying to appeal to, & is overly reliant on visuals to distract the audience with a big spectacle. If you're looking for a movie where youA popcorn flick at the level of Transformers in that it's gimmicky, has no specific age target it's trying to appeal to, & is overly reliant on visuals to distract the audience with a big spectacle. If you're looking for a movie where you can shut off your brain, then it's fine.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

RalfbergsJan 2, 2021

It was watchable movie, but I really hate that it really didn't has a proper ending as they just will be makin another sequel and in this one not that many things are resolved really. So ends up like too spread out and when I get to nextIt was watchable movie, but I really hate that it really didn't has a proper ending as they just will be makin another sequel and in this one not that many things are resolved really. So ends up like too spread out and when I get to next movie I will have finished about this one.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

PeterAlexanderDec 13, 2016

Whilst a charming tale, Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them is a noticeable descent from the magic of the Harry Potter series. The main characters are not likeable and the film lacks a proper villain. Due to a somewhat disengaging plot,Whilst a charming tale, Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them is a noticeable descent from the magic of the Harry Potter series. The main characters are not likeable and the film lacks a proper villain. Due to a somewhat disengaging plot, the final act is not the epic conclusion it tries to be. Despite this, it is a fun little movie and the array of beasts themselves are amusing.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

6

Rebecca31Nov 20, 2016

Are you a fan of Harry Potter? Do you miss Harry Potter? Has nothing filled the void since Harry Potter finished? Well then why not go see a movie that's not Harry Potter but is about wizards. Not starring any of your favourite characters butAre you a fan of Harry Potter? Do you miss Harry Potter? Has nothing filled the void since Harry Potter finished? Well then why not go see a movie that's not Harry Potter but is about wizards. Not starring any of your favourite characters but does star an awkward Eddie Redmayne stumbling around 1920s New York with a suitcase full of magical creatures. Joined by a no-maj (yeah they don't even use the term muggle) but you will hear the words Hogwarts and Dumbledore so there’s always that. The effects for the fantastic beasts really are quite magical and I can't fault the acting from anyone but I will fault the direction. Yes David Yates I'm talking to you. How you've managed to direct the last 4 Harry Potter movies and now the next 4 Fantastic Beasts movies I'll never know, you uncreative waste of space. The biggest problem is this movie has absolutely no heart and no real story, more like two badly paced stories shoved together in the last twenty minutes. Recommended but if you're expecting this to feel like a Harry Potter movie then you'd be better off watching any of those movies instead.… Expand

4 of 10 users found this helpful46

All this user's reviews

6

triple_coDec 30, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Aesthetically this is a very well made film that looks the part and has the feel of both the Harry Potter franchise and something new. The creatures, locations and characters all look fantastic. There is a lot of be enjoyed in the colours and visuals throughout the movie.

Story wise however, it lacks clarity and focus and tends to leave plot points unattended. Several characters in this film seem to be swept away by the narrative and are unnecessary to the plot, with a couple ultimately being forgotten about by the end. There were too many main characters, leaving the pacing feeling cluttered and overwhelming. In addition, there was not enough focus on the orphanage, Credence or the main villain, Grindelwald. There was lots of world building throughout, but not enough put on the actual characters of this film.

Enjoyable enough, and a movie that Harry Potter fanatics will love, but it lacks focus and gets a little muddled in its pacing and plot.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

SouthboundbevyNov 25, 2016

The movie doesn't capture the magic of Harry Potter movies, but it is ok. I just hope that future installments will be better. I need a better story and characters I could like more.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

hassallJan 8, 2017

I enjoyed this movie but the bad guy wasnt great we dont know anything about him,why he is bad and stuff. Im not saying i hated this movie but dont say this movie is similar to harry potter the only thing that is slightly similar to harryI enjoyed this movie but the bad guy wasnt great we dont know anything about him,why he is bad and stuff. Im not saying i hated this movie but dont say this movie is similar to harry potter the only thing that is slightly similar to harry potter is they say dumbledore and hogwarts. This movie is not bad not good nowhere near as good as harry potter.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

6

ScarlettMiNov 23, 2016

This movie was all over the place. Sometimes it was dark and compelling (Samantha Morton, Colin Farrell, Ezra Miller). Sometimes it was fun, energetic, and charming (Dan Fogler, Alison Sudol). And sometimes it was bland and forgettable (EddieThis movie was all over the place. Sometimes it was dark and compelling (Samantha Morton, Colin Farrell, Ezra Miller). Sometimes it was fun, energetic, and charming (Dan Fogler, Alison Sudol). And sometimes it was bland and forgettable (Eddie Redmayne, Katherine Waterston).

I liked parts of it a lot. Even parts with wildly different tones and plots worked for me (even if they didn't necessarily work well together). In the end, however, it felt like a lot of potential and a lot of wasted opportunities. I think there could have been two really good films here, instead of one that was simply okay.

I liked more than I disliked and there's definitely a lot of material left here to build a film franchise on (as they're planning to do). Unfortunately a horrible casting decision sucked out a good deal of my enthusiasm. That character reveal evoked laughter from the audience at my theater and *not* in a good way. It's the worst misstep in a movie that wasn't exactly perfect to begin.

It was an entertaining movie and it was not a bad movie. I'd recommend it to fans of the Harry Potter universe for sure. I was mostly left wishing it had been better but I didn't regret having seen it.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

6

NihilisticNov 23, 2016

I had mixed feelings about this movie, I did like the characters, parts of the story, and the special effects. Over all however, I found the movie to be dull and boring. It lost most of the dark elements that I liked in Harry Potter, but weI had mixed feelings about this movie, I did like the characters, parts of the story, and the special effects. Over all however, I found the movie to be dull and boring. It lost most of the dark elements that I liked in Harry Potter, but we shouldn't be comparing this with the main series, since the movie feels like a standalone. It was shallow, digging only slightly in topics and themes. This ensured that the movie was entertaining to watch.. or was it? I personally found myself blanking out at moments during the movie and tried to look for a deeper meaning within the movie. I couldn't much apart from clichés and an overall average movie. The abuse was used to make the movie seem more mature, yet I was thinking about why I was watching a movie aimed at children.… Expand

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

6

Dr_Shooter24Nov 28, 2016

It's a quite dissapointing film, taking into account where it comes from. There is not any memorable characters as it used to be in Harry Potter, and it's lack of wit makes it a dull film. At least it is quite entertaining, but there isIt's a quite dissapointing film, taking into account where it comes from. There is not any memorable characters as it used to be in Harry Potter, and it's lack of wit makes it a dull film. At least it is quite entertaining, but there is nothing that really makes it attractive apart from the fact that i's origin. Eddie Redmayne it´s ok, but he is suspiciously becoming a little bit repeatitive in his performances.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

6

KaptenVideoDec 9, 2016

Not really my cup of tea anymore but If you're into Harry Potter, current wave of superhero movies, and/or "Night at the Museum", you will probably like it quite a bit.

It will probably make a billion dollars (seriously, even the leastNot really my cup of tea anymore but If you're into Harry Potter, current wave of superhero movies, and/or "Night at the Museum", you will probably like it quite a bit.

It will probably make a billion dollars (seriously, even the least successful "Harry Potter" movie did 800 million dollars in cinemas), and it will have four sequels.

I don't want to spoil anything but don't go just to see Johnny Depp.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

testuser-4Dec 7, 2016

Set in the magical world of witchcraft, Fantastic Beasts is really worthy of the hype and the stir it's been causing for a almost a year now. The film itself is emotionally charged and action-packed, just like we've come to know everythingSet in the magical world of witchcraft, Fantastic Beasts is really worthy of the hype and the stir it's been causing for a almost a year now. The film itself is emotionally charged and action-packed, just like we've come to know everything Rowling has ever touched. With a great script from JK, great direction from David Yates, outstanding performances from the whole cast (Eddie Redmayne especially), and breath-taking visual effects, it's safe to say that this is the first journey of what looks like a franchise that will be up to the level of the pinnacle that is Harry Potter "testuser-4"… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

6

Magic84Dec 11, 2016

Weak villian due to no motivation explained by a weak plot. Special effects are good but as good as smother movies with similar budget. I feel like they tried way too hard to set up this new franchise rather than produce a solid film.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

Kire_92May 4, 2018

It a fun movie but it got some flaws. I did not care much about the story and thought that the majority of the characters were uninteresting, including the main character. And for some reason it did not give me the Harry Potter feeling whichIt a fun movie but it got some flaws. I did not care much about the story and thought that the majority of the characters were uninteresting, including the main character. And for some reason it did not give me the Harry Potter feeling which made it feel like a fan film with a very high budget. Though the movie was not boring, it was just lacking anything that was truly interesting. In the end it was still enjoyable overall but I hope they make the sequel more interesting plot wise.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

GrantD243Dec 3, 2018

Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them has the magical feeling that you want from a Harry Potter film. It's also awesome to see what it's like for adults to be out in the magical world on their own and freely use magic as they see fit. NewtFantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them has the magical feeling that you want from a Harry Potter film. It's also awesome to see what it's like for adults to be out in the magical world on their own and freely use magic as they see fit. Newt is also a very likable character, arguably much more likable than any of the kids in the original Harry Potter films. Unfortunately, the story just doesn't do it for me. The creatures are cool, but Newt spends most of the film just chasing creatures around New York, while there's also a sub-plot that is trying to incorporate some darker themes into the film. Neither storyline is particularly that interesting or engaging, and I couldn't help but be disappointed that this is all J.K. Rowling could come up with for the Harry Potter first spin-off film.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

meydianarizki21Mar 15, 2021

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. No story & too much CGI
I have to say that I am really disappointed of the movie as a whole. The Harry Potter movies are easily one of the best and most rewatchable movie franchises so far. And this movie is sadly nothing like the original HP movies. The only thing that is has in common are the special effects (for the apparitions). There was no real dialogue between the characters. Just silly one-liners and the occasional humorous remark. I am also very angered by the fact that they just introduced a new concept (obscurials) to the HP franchise that would literally change everything (if obscurials exist why hasn't Harry Potter become one? After all he fits the criteria).

There was also way too much CGI in the movie. It became a real nuisance after a while. Especially because it wasn't even "up to today's standards".

My final critique concerns the overall flair of the movie. It just didn't feel like it belongs to the magnum opus that is the HP movie franchise. And righteously so; why did they film it in NYC? The HP franchise is the most British thing since James Bond and Doctor Who. I never really realized it before but now that I watched this movie it became very clear to me. You can't just change the location like this and expect the audience to embrace it. Sorry. What's next? Fantastic Beasts in Japan? No thanks. We already have that, it's called Kaiju.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

BelousNov 14, 2018

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. You know what was good about “Harry Potter”? It had “Harry Potter” in the title and it was about Harry Potter. In “Fantastic Beasts and where to find them” there are those “beasts”, but the problem is that the movie is not about them and has a single word about where to find them.
The film begins with a battle of a group of mages and a mysterious dark sorcerer and a bunch of newspapers headlines about someone called Grindelwald. Who is it? That’s a good question. If you want to know than go watch sequel, because he is not in this one. The twist of Grindewald’s exposure is very weak, it simply leads to nothing. Throw it out of the movie and nothing will change. Oh, wait, if you do that than it wouldn’t be so interesting to see the sequel. It’s really sad when the first movie of a cycle tries to sell you the sequel.
What is a real pity is the fact that the beasts are absolutely gorgeous, but there’s too little screen time with them. The story just begins when some of them flee, later they become a secondary storyline, giving the first place to Creedence. He is a very powerful wizard, who turns into an obscurus, a dangerous magical creature, by suppressing his magical powers. And someone might say: “But here is your magical beast and a story about it!”, but it is a very cheap move. The viewer clearly understands that the story of the beasts ends with the capturing of the last escaped creature, long before the end of the movie. Who is this Creedence guy? Why should I care for him? The whole movie feels like the creators just stuffed too much and didn’t bother to make some part really good.
But no everything is bad here. Eddy Redmayne (Newt) and Ezra Miller (Creedence) are superb in portraying their characters. You could watch this movie for their performances alone. It’s difficult to say something good about other aspects of this film. The editing feels raggy and awkward, the stories are skin-deep, and the sequel baiting is frustrating. The movie had potential but it lacks of polishness almost in every aspect.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

6

BulgarianCriticNov 21, 2018

I was never a big fan of harry potter so i wasn't expecting anything that interesting when i went to the theaters to watch Fantastic beasts and where to find them.And oh boy i am glad i did.The effects of the creatures were really well madI was never a big fan of harry potter so i wasn't expecting anything that interesting when i went to the theaters to watch Fantastic beasts and where to find them.And oh boy i am glad i did.The effects of the creatures were really well mad and the story and characters were also intriguing to watch and listen to.If you wanna see some interesting fantastical beasts and also some harry potter magic i suggest you go watch it… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

BruterakeMay 11, 2022

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Achei um filme ok, é inegável o valor de produção o filme é muito bonito e gostei da ideia da expansão de domínio ali do mago dentro da maleta mas, não sei achei estranho sabe ele com a cara meio torta o filme parece ter um apelo muito grande pra quem é mais criança assim não curti o vilão e ou como o flash aceita aquele papel o cara passa o filme inteiro com cara de assustado e tomando tapa na cara pra depois virar fumaça preta do mal.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

r96skMay 10, 2022

Remarkably lacklustre for a film involving magical creatures.

'Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them' underwhelmed me, in short. At no moment across the 130 or so minute run time was I ever invested or drawn into the story or theRemarkably lacklustre for a film involving magical creatures.

'Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them' underwhelmed me, in short. At no moment across the 130 or so minute run time was I ever invested or drawn into the story or the characters. I didn't feel any good performances from the cast either. Dan Fogler sticks out in my memory most, though the rest are forgettable.

The special effects are also not to the level I was expecting; that's not to say that they are bad and I'm not certain what I was indeed anticipating from them, but I just found 'em to be meh - nothing blew me away. Which is a vibe that I got from the whole film unfortunately.

Hopefully 'Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald' does more for me.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

TyranianApr 9, 2019

Great visuals but terrible lead character and really dumb plot ruin this film.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

LeZeeApr 14, 2017

Well, everything's in the title itself, you watch it only to confirm.

I don't want to be so negative like the film critics, but this is a big disappointment for me watching being a film fanatic. I don't think anyone who loved 'Harry Potter'Well, everything's in the title itself, you watch it only to confirm.

I don't want to be so negative like the film critics, but this is a big disappointment for me watching being a film fanatic. I don't think anyone who loved 'Harry Potter' film series would thumb this new beginning. This is not like 'The Lord of the Rings' and 'The Hobbit' from the same universe, but different trilogies. I was excited for something like that, as a concept wise, for the fresh tale from from the fresh characters in the same universe. I don't know about the book version, but the film did not click for me.

It had a bunch of nice characters, and to set in the Harry Potter universe, really it should have been a masterpiece. The major drawback was the story. There's nothing to appreciate the screenplay. It's about some creatures from the magical world got out in the human world, just like 'Jumanji'. So our hero struggles to recapture them. Meanwhile, some others too involved in and the reason will be revealed in the final stage.

Nice casting and great visuals. I won't point out its director's fault, because he has done his duty very well. He's also will be the man behind the rest of the sequels. I think it deserved the Oscars for the costume design. Not a bad film, particularly for the kids. Comparing it with the Harry Potter franchise makes it a worst film, but independently it is an okay film. So the initiation was average, but I'm still expecting the follow ups to be much better.

5/10… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

eagleeyevikingApr 20, 2017

'Fantastic Beasts' is entertaining throughout and sets up its sequels on solid foundations in terms of the bigger picture threat, but the film itself is a choppy, uneven mess between two storylines. It also doesn't help to be filled with bad'Fantastic Beasts' is entertaining throughout and sets up its sequels on solid foundations in terms of the bigger picture threat, but the film itself is a choppy, uneven mess between two storylines. It also doesn't help to be filled with bad CGI and underdeveloped characters.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

BadAidsNov 24, 2016

It's been nearly half a decade since Pottheads got their last fix from the silver screen and for many a JK-Junkie out there, Fantastic Beasts and Where To Find Them was the most eagerly anticipated film of 2016. Fantastic Beasts offers anIt's been nearly half a decade since Pottheads got their last fix from the silver screen and for many a JK-Junkie out there, Fantastic Beasts and Where To Find Them was the most eagerly anticipated film of 2016. Fantastic Beasts offers an interesting mix of familiarity and new beginnings as the Potterverse welcomes back David Yeats, director of the previous 4 Harry Potter installments, and sees J.K Rowling's maiden voyage as a screenwriter.
I've always been a fan of the Potter films, save for my hatred of Deathly Hallows:Part 1, and I was certainly looking forward to seeing what else Rowling had to offer but this films serves as more of an appetiser rather than a main course. Full of great effects and solid performances from Redmayne and Fogler, the film offers very little in terms of story, which, when considering this was penned by one of the most successful authors of all time, is largely dissappointing.
Set in a beautifully designed 1920's New York, clearly no expense was spared for the effects budget as Fantastic Beasts does exactly what it says on the tin by offering the audience a sample of some beautifully imaginative creatures. Unfortunately this is a case of style over substance as by the end of the film the beasts are playing second fiddle to a dim-witted auror (Katherine Waterston)and the American Ministry of Magic subplot. An interesting point to note is some of the darker tones that Rowling is attempting to examine this time round. Child abuse, albeit a theme in previous Potter films, and capital punishment spring to mind but there is certain, uncomfortable and perhaps perverted atmosphere between Graves (Farrell) and Credence Barebone (Miller) that I found odd. This darker tone, not too disimilar from the later Potter films, was an intriguing element in the film and I'm interested in whether or not these will be explored in the forecoming sequels. On a broader scale, Fantastic Beasts is similar to Warcraft(2016), by way of an underwhelming film that will no doubt produce several offspring. The film markets itself on the idea of a new story set in a familiar universe but, under it's thin layer of narrative, lies the all too familiar shell of a money-hungry franchise... But hey! thats Hollywood folks, so buy your overpriced popcorn, sit back, relax and let this wave of mediocrity wash over you.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

5

Xan_RyilDec 2, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Here’s what’s wrong with Fantastic Beasts…!!!!

1. Eddie Redmayne
Eddie could hold first 10 position on this list because of his worst ever portrayal of any character written by J. K Rowling. It’s a new low by an Oscar winner. Even with all the efforts by writer and director, Eddie not only failed to make audience feel infatuated with him but one can’t even relate to his character. It has something to do with his hate towards camera’s lenses or his love for his side profile that he would rather should his left cheek most of the time instead of facing the camera. His acting is pretty much unidimensional. Character shows no development or attachment to anyone besides harnessing some weird animals. 2. Rest of the cast
As much as we praised the casting director of Harry Potter for bringing such brilliant mix to our lives, audience will curse the casting director of Fantastic for the job to bring worst performers on the screen…altogether. None of the actors could really fit in the character (much thanks to J. K. Rowling’s very weak characterization). Every actor seems to be the miss fit. And wearing weird costumes and hair. Lead characters seems to miss the cohesiveness among them even they witch sisters are distant. Some characters hardly acknowledge another’s screen presence.

3. The adventure
Unlike Harry Potter and as the movie is sold, there is less or no adventure involved. Eventually the biggest threat is the exposure (which does not sound that much of a threat). There is nothing left in the action sequence when it’s known to be harmless to living being whether it’s animal or dark force which despite of revolving around the person who betrayed him does not hard him a bit ( not even his hair were messed up while Eddie’s were all messed up throughout )

4. Plotline and Characterization
Story is pretty much vague, we never know, how did the beasts escaped at the first? Here much is left to imagination or presumption that only die hard readers of the books are watching the movie. Also the intentions of characters are not clear, why Newt is taking Jacob to everywhere, only likeness is not enough, beside the movie would have still be the same without Jacob as he plays no role in whole movie at all. Same is the character of Queenie and her affection for Jacob. Some sub plots used, were only waste of budget especially Shaw’s death and his father & brother’s rage. Signing John Voight for a role which has no significance was mismanagement by studio. I personally struggled to have fun during most of the part. Story was plain straight and offered no excitement.

5. Finale
Ending is very much like any other super hero movie. Someone trying to take over and destroying building during its movement however it does not do much harm we’ll give it that ( and they can’t come up with sequel where heroes will be held responsible or be divided among themselves to take responsibility of the destruction and mass murder). Even though Tine was closer to credence (a character which should won award for the worst hair cut in history of mankind), she sends Newt to save and talk to him. Another failed effort by W Bros to create beloved hero (but with Eddie’s stupid acting or in words of Sia “Cheap Thrills” it’s impossible). Graves’ intentions about obscurus and newt are so unclear. It’s not revealed what he wanted to do with obscurus and it was annoying what he was doing with Newt in the subway. As is the fact that they have planned 4 more movies after this adventure less movie. What’s good with Fantastic Beasts?

1. Collin Farrell
Mr. Farrell is the best thing in the movie. Although his character lacks the depth and background but Collin gave persona and intensity to it. He literally owned every frame he was in. He could have been one of those series antagonists who are both evil and memorable. 2. Cameo
I was not going to write it as it would have caused “Spoiler Alert” but I cannot, not write about it. Johnny Depp’s cameo is the best cameo ever in film or television. Even that I had read about it, still I completely forgot and almost jumped out of my seat to see him. He gave us hope.

3. Future prospects
Now that Eddie is signed and played Newt, they can’t replace him but J. K. Rowling can bring Albus Dumbledore in the story and make him the lead instead. It would make the story much mature, dark and fan favorite.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

5

Thejudge21Jan 27, 2017

If you are going into this expecting the same magic that was in all the harry Potter films you will be disappointed. It's not a terrible film, it has its moments, but you never get close to the characters, you quickly forget them when theIf you are going into this expecting the same magic that was in all the harry Potter films you will be disappointed. It's not a terrible film, it has its moments, but you never get close to the characters, you quickly forget them when the film is over, and if they make a sequel, it won't be first on your films to see list. Eddie Redmayne was miscast, too ponderous, too layed back, and mumbling right through the film. If you had that many fantastic beasts you would at least smile now and then or be the slightest bit exited. He was like watching paint dry. Poor script, trying to be many things but being none, especially a romantic film with such a dour main actor. The ending summed it all up. Not enough character storytelling and character's you care about. Which is what made the harry Potter films so enjoyable.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

5

royledesma90Nov 18, 2016

Realmente es muy grato volver al mundo mágico después de tantos años y comprobar que Rowling puede escribir bien un guion es placentero, existe fe de que las próximas entregas serán mejores. Por el lado técnico, la iluminación me parecióRealmente es muy grato volver al mundo mágico después de tantos años y comprobar que Rowling puede escribir bien un guion es placentero, existe fe de que las próximas entregas serán mejores. Por el lado técnico, la iluminación me pareció desmedidamente oscura. yates hace mas de lo mismo, la música esta bastante bien. Por su parte, los actores estuvieron muy bien.… Expand

4 of 15 users found this helpful411

All this user's reviews

5

Megajohn85Nov 18, 2016

Just because Rowling wrote the initial Harry Potter books doesn't mean her first foray into screenwriting with "Fantastic Beasts" screams masterpiece...it actually screams "Jump The Shark"

12 of 29 users found this helpful1217

All this user's reviews

5

Seymour_MoviesNov 27, 2016

Fantastically average movie that is only worth watching as an extension to the Harry Potter films. While there was nothing outrageously bad about his movie, there was nothing great about it either. If not connected to the HP series, thisFantastically average movie that is only worth watching as an extension to the Harry Potter films. While there was nothing outrageously bad about his movie, there was nothing great about it either. If not connected to the HP series, this would have been a made for TV movie or worse.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

5

CicoNutNov 28, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. J.K. Rowling’s long awaited return to the wizarding world has finally hit cinemas,and it’s not the best movie about sorcerers duking it out in New York to come out this year *cough* Doctor Strange *cough*. In fact, it might just be one of the worst Harry Potter movies so far. But why is this?

Firstly, the movie is far too overstuffed. We are in about half an hour and despite being introduced to him, we know virtually nothing about the protagonist. That’s not always a problem, but when it’s universe building your making time for, it can take you out of the film’s narrative. And this throughout the movie, as it hops back and forth between the main story of Newt Scamander (Eddie Redmayne) gathering his fantastic beasts, a side story about Credence (Ezra Miller) being abused by his mother, another story about Collin Farrell being a fat ugly pale Johnny Depp (spoilers) and another side story about a business man and his son, who runs for president, but promptly dies. And then that story goes absolutely nowhere. Because apparently adult drama became too sophisticated for a wizard movie.

The other problem is the title is misleading: it’s called, ‘Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them’, yet some of the creatures just look like hybrid monstrosities and the rest look like already existing animals with giant testicles on their heads. Ew. And the pre-2005 era CGI looks horrendous.

But there is a lot to like in this film, too. Dan Fogler is an absolute joy to watch on screen and steals literally every scene he’s in. That’s why seeing his memory erased in the end saddened me, as it means there won’t be any more Jacob Kowalsky later movies. Aside from him though, Eddie Redmayne does his usual, socially awkward shtick where he just kind of acts like himself, while Katherine Waterson and Fine Frenzy to good jobs as the magical Goldstein Sisters.

While there are some aspects of this movie you can enjoy, you will most likely be disappointed in the not-so-fantastic beasts and the way J.K. Rowling shamelessly tries to cash in on the successes of Marvel and Star Wars, as she spends so much time setting up sequels she ultimately fails to have a little fun and actually tell a good story, which we know she is well capable of doing.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

TrevorsViewDec 9, 2016

I’m not quite sure what to make of this newest cinematic expansion of the Wizarding World. In one part, Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them feels like a kid’s movie with its majestic use of magic. In another part, its marketing and ratingI’m not quite sure what to make of this newest cinematic expansion of the Wizarding World. In one part, Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them feels like a kid’s movie with its majestic use of magic. In another part, its marketing and rating suggests a teen movie. Yet at the same time, its 1920s setting and cast of adult characters suggests something that would appeal best to those who grew up with the original Harry Potter adventures. Well one thing is for sure, this new adaptation by the immortal J.K. Rowling is not going to appeal to anybody in the long-run.

If anything, Fantastic Beasts seems mostly most like an adventure for the teenage girl, as the very casting of Eddie Redmayne (The Danish Girl, The Theory of Everything) will satisfy their fantasies with his boyish charm, along with a half-baked romance between a down-on-his-luck baker and a zesty accountant. But even so, I doubt any high school cheerleaders would be screaming their heads off over a film focused on combining the roaring twenties with a children’s imagination.

Yet true to what the world of Harry Potter has always done, this historical setting is rich with culture. It turns out that unlike the United Kingdom, America has a different word for muggles; “No-Mags,” and their relationships align much closer to the Salem witch trials than simple racism. The two worlds between the wizards and No-Mags’ each look as captivating as they do true to the historical era, complete with a scandalous goblin singing at a bar.

Then in comes skimpy old Newt Scamander, played by the same British actor I previously mentioned. He arrives in New York City on the Fort Elizabeth, with a secret mission involving his magical briefcase. Just step inside his case, and you will see an immense world inside: room upon room housing some of the most fascinating beasts you will find. These include leafy little bowtruckles, a money-mad niffler, a mischievous demiguise, and a size-shifting occamy. Kids will love seeing these imaginative designs, but what they’re doing in a PG-13 movie I cannot say.

Teens would certainly not care about seeing these beasts anyway, as the special effects used to bring them to life is distractingly awful. Remember in the Harry Potter movies when computer generated imagery was only used when necessary? Now here, it is use in practically every frame for every scenario, even in places where makeup prosthetics would have gotten the job done easy. Think the entire Hobbit trilogy, except without any effort by the visual effects team.

These beasts have ended up under the hands of a No-Mag named Mr. Kowalski who has dreams of starting his own bakery. Yet he mistakenly lets the case open, and several of the beasts loose into the city. Now Newt has to bring him as a witness to protect his innocence from the National Astute of Secrecy, or else face serious criminal penalty for exposing the wizarding community to the No-Mags.

There are points here and there that reveal how a great movie could have been made, but for the greater portion, the blank performances by the majority of the cast send a preposterous message that says the law and government should not control us. If you ask me, these negative, limiting depictions of political authorities is way too common in our movie theaters, and our leaders deserve better treatment. Even worse, this predictable story is ruined all the more by a plot twist that adds nothing; literally nothing to the story.

Yet it doesn’t stop there. After a snore-inducing climax, the final moments try to emotionally manipulate you as if the filmmakers felt that they earned it somehow—they didn’t. Then they of course have to leave the final frame open for a sequel which I obviously will not be looking forward to.

If you think that Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them is a dream come true for your inner witch or wizard, I hate to break it to you: look elsewhere. This attempt at keeping the franchise alive and fresh is only making it age all the more, and its attempted relational bonds between America and England does not feel any stronger either. I could really use a great motion picture that makes us people feel united in spite of differences in a world that wants us to feel otherwise, and this does not accomplish that.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

5

FilipeNetoJun 26, 2020

The Harry Potter universe has become one of the most lucrative and remarkable cinematic phenomena we know. Personally, I am one of many teenagers who read all the books and saw all the films but I was afraid when I heard about the idea ofThe Harry Potter universe has become one of the most lucrative and remarkable cinematic phenomena we know. Personally, I am one of many teenagers who read all the books and saw all the films but I was afraid when I heard about the idea of making this film. The environment is very different from what we saw in Harry Potter and, if it weren't for the mention of several elements we saw in previous films, the link would be very small. Accentuating the differences is the fact that this film takes place between World Wars and has New York as its setting.

The idea for this film came from the small book "Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them", and it follows the adventures of their fictional author, Newt Scamander. He goes to New York with a suitcase of little monsters, some of them escape and their eagerness to recapture them puts the city in an uproar and concerns the magical authorities. However, some incidents are attributed to Scamander's animals, who refute responsibilities and end up engaged in an effort to discover what powerful evil being has caused them.

The story, dark and mysterious, manages to keep our interest but the prestige of Harry Potter universe and our willingness to see how it all will end helped a lot. In fact, now we can check all its problems, which make it more boring than the worst of Harry Potter films: it takes a long time to develop and the story, initially confusing, turns out to be illogical and underdeveloped. Another problem is their poorly developed and generally one-dimensional characters. Scamander may be nerdy but he lacks charisma and leadership. The Goldstein witches goes from naive to stubborn. Credence looks like a man with a traumatic depression and Kowalski is just an idiotic "muggle".

David Yates did a good job. I am convinced that he was decisive in preventing this film from being a fiasco. In fact, with all the problems, the overall performance of the cast, mostly little known to me, is naturally affected and only the hand of a skilled director could help them. Despite being a good actor, Eddie Redmayne does not perform miracles and is far from his best. Dan Fogler managed to be more interesting and charismatic than he, in the same proportion that he knew how to be funny and to captivate public's sympathy. Alison Sudol also captures our sympathy by giving her character a candid and sweet aura, but she is so sugary and stupid that I wanted to hit her with a chair. Another actor able of becoming sympathetic was Ezra Miller, but I think he didn't have enough material to develop his character beyond anger and a depressive cry. Katherine Waterston was uninteresting. Colin Farrell is somber but doesn't seem to know what he's doing. Carmen Ejogo is hateful. Worse than she, Samantha Morton seems to have been inspired by the wicked witch of the fairy tales. We also have the additions of Ron Perlman, unrecognizable but impeccable, and Johnny Depp, who does nothing more than an irrelevant and uninteresting cameo.

Technically, this is a very visual film, thanks to tons of very high quality CGI, as we would expect. Its an expensive film, a super-production where green screen was the key. As it should be, the film is loaded with magical creatures that we have never seen before and each one is more incredible than the other. I especially liked the niffler, which looks like a friendly kleptomaniac platypus. Cinematography is characterized by good colors, a misty but pleasant environment, good use of light and dark and very clear footage. To add aesthetic quality, we have the charm of the Thirties, the golden decade for New York. Few decades have given us so much charm and style: magnificent cars, clothes and props that are still in fashion today and an incredible urban landscape, where there is no lack of fog and rain. For a moment, I almost felt like I was in a gangster movie, just missing the jazz background. The soundtrack, by James Newton Howard, is good and epic, but it is not surprising for those who has seen Harry Potter.

Although the film exudes style, it lacks content, good characters and a strong and charismatic lead. Anyway, it achieved a feat that even Harry Potter, who broke box office records, managed to achieve: finally the franchise won an Oscar, for Best Costume Design, which in fact was deserved.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

benskylerhillMay 27, 2018

Far from being a terrible movie, Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them is nonetheless woefully unnecessary and not nearly as fun as it could have been. It does carry on the Harry Potter universe in a sufficiently charming way, but it reallyFar from being a terrible movie, Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them is nonetheless woefully unnecessary and not nearly as fun as it could have been. It does carry on the Harry Potter universe in a sufficiently charming way, but it really comes across as riding the coattails of a successful franchise while not doing enough to build its own compelling story.

What made the Harry Potter series so endearing was its characters. Each character both main and minor had their own compelling arc that was visible in each film and carried on throughout the saga. Fantastic Beasts does have very quirky characters that are incredibly fun to watch and also have enough charm and emotion to make them worth caring about. The performances are suitably strong--with the exception of a few minor characters--and the banter between them makes the film watchable.

But beyond this, the movie has some serious problems that really make the experience entirely forgettable. Though this is certainly surface level, the CGI is just bad at many parts of the movie. They're not all bad. About half of them work just fine, but there are parts in which entire rooms are constructed using computers when it's not even an action sequence and therefore completely unnecessary. Many scenes don't even look finished, and it certainly makes the beasts not-so-fantastic.

Another problem is the story. The plot weaves through a tangled mess of main quests and subplots to the point where I didn't even know what the movie was about when the credits rolled. It gets off to a very slow, boring start and doesn't get much better from there. Not only that, but many crucial details that are essential to the story feel very forced, unbelievable, and shoehorned into the script for the sole purpose of advancing--and therefore creating--a plot.

Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them is sure to entertain long-time fans of Harry Potter, but it's unlikely to have converted any new followers to the franchise and it certainly doesn't have a leg to stand on its own.

Story: 1
Acting: 7.5
Script: 7
Visuals/Sound: 5
Entertainment Value: 5

OVERALL SCORE: 5.1/10… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

5

aaaaronApr 21, 2022

It is a good movie, but the action sequences without dialogue fellt a little too much and dull, they weren't very intriguing for me.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

jjjjoshMay 27, 2023

Not good. Disappointing. Worse than the Harry Potter films. Don't recommend. Don't intend to watch sequels.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

lancekozNov 25, 2016

Strange world now... such over the top incredible seamless effects, incredible hi-price cast, and people-who-really-know-stuff Art Direction... in service to such a silly, cliche-laden story that only children could love, but at the sameStrange world now... such over the top incredible seamless effects, incredible hi-price cast, and people-who-really-know-stuff Art Direction... in service to such a silly, cliche-laden story that only children could love, but at the same time, too complex and dark for children. Starts out with some light and fantastic moments, ends up about as pleasant (and loud) as a weekend in Aleppo, Syria. Oddly touches on Fascism, waterboarding, Trump... with dragons. The pre-modern visualization of New York city was wonderful. But brief.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

familyguyNov 19, 2016

What the hell with Eddie Redmayne? Entire a film he only have 1 boring expression. Is that how 2 times oscar nominated and 1 win acting. His performance like this film is the pain in the ass and he just want to go home soon after work hour.What the hell with Eddie Redmayne? Entire a film he only have 1 boring expression. Is that how 2 times oscar nominated and 1 win acting. His performance like this film is the pain in the ass and he just want to go home soon after work hour. Seriously they should more screen time on Colin farrel… Expand

1 of 6 users found this helpful15

All this user's reviews

4

Brent_MarchantNov 20, 2016

The only thing fantastic about this one is the special effects. The story, writing and acting are all flat, meandering along with little direction, personality or qualities that make the picture even remotely interesting. I frankly couldn'tThe only thing fantastic about this one is the special effects. The story, writing and acting are all flat, meandering along with little direction, personality or qualities that make the picture even remotely interesting. I frankly couldn't wait for this one to end. Zzzzzzzz....… Expand

4 of 12 users found this helpful48

All this user's reviews

4

dr_heartlessNov 22, 2016

Painfully bland and full of wasted potential. The movie's "dark" tone is totally unearned. Sure it looks dark, cribbing HARD from the last two Potter movies for music and tone. It really just comes down to the movie marketing itself as darkPainfully bland and full of wasted potential. The movie's "dark" tone is totally unearned. Sure it looks dark, cribbing HARD from the last two Potter movies for music and tone. It really just comes down to the movie marketing itself as dark when in reality this is a pretty lighthearted film. None of the dread and desperation that made the "Deathly Hallows" so memorable are present. The characters are flat. You get to know almost nothing about them and that do not grow or change at all. The story is constantly trying to throw twists at the audience but none of it matters anyway due to there never really being clear stakes. It all feels hallow. In fact the big twist at the end is so utterly ridiculous that I actually exclaimed "Oh come on" out loud in the theater. If you're okay with a brainless popcorn movie for the holidays this is perfect. There's some fun to be had for long time Potter fans but that's about it.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

4

ksipeMay 7, 2023

Mediocre, uninspired, boring. Dropped after half an hour. Constant teleportation was obnoxious.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

RollingStonerNov 19, 2016

This movie is definitely made for die hard Harry Potter fans. If you absolutely love the Harry Potter movies, you would probably already say this is amazing without even having to watch it. But for someone who was not a die hard fan, thisThis movie is definitely made for die hard Harry Potter fans. If you absolutely love the Harry Potter movies, you would probably already say this is amazing without even having to watch it. But for someone who was not a die hard fan, this movie is quite "meh". The pacing in the film is way off, the story line of the main characters and the villain have absolutely nothing to do with each other and never really has anything at stake, some of the CGI is actually terrible (which stands out compared to the really good CGI it has), and just an overall weak story that just screams sequel. Not a terrible movie, but really quite forgettable.… Expand

10 of 26 users found this helpful1016

All this user's reviews

4

The3AcademySinsNov 24, 2017

I'm a die hard Harry Potter fan and let me tell you, Fantastic Beasts did NOTHING for me. I felt there was a lot of untapped potential about the American magical world, and what we did see was very lacking or bland. The characters were kindI'm a die hard Harry Potter fan and let me tell you, Fantastic Beasts did NOTHING for me. I felt there was a lot of untapped potential about the American magical world, and what we did see was very lacking or bland. The characters were kind of brushed over, and I felt like I didn't really get to know Newt or his companions or even the villain, so I didn't really care about ANY of the characters. The magical duels and dangerous high stakes moments were lifeless to me because I felt the script made all of the characters safe, they all had way too much plot armor. The CGI for the beasts was pretty fantastic, they were easily the best done part of the film. Mostly though, I was bored out of my mind.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

4

JUSTINT123Nov 18, 2016

Lacks originality and soul, at least 20 minutes too long, and the special effects team seems to think that we want to watch bricks fly around- a lot. If it wasn't for the baker, his girlfriend, and the platypus, it would be almost unwatchable.

9 of 19 users found this helpful910

All this user's reviews

4

Praetorian333Nov 20, 2016

This film unfortunately contains none of the "heart" or emotion of the Harry Potter series. It simply feels like the empty husk of a film. There's nothing substantial about the characters without ham-handed exposition. I'm a massive fan ofThis film unfortunately contains none of the "heart" or emotion of the Harry Potter series. It simply feels like the empty husk of a film. There's nothing substantial about the characters without ham-handed exposition. I'm a massive fan of the HP universe, but this one just felt very flavorless to me. The actors fell flat, not due to their ability, but due to either poor writing or direction. Colin Farrell is completely wasted in this film, as are some other characters who could have been so much deeper. Overall, it's a letdown of a film that simply moseys from plot point to plot point, with little actual substance.… Expand

2 of 8 users found this helpful26

All this user's reviews

4

rimpybharotNov 22, 2016

this comes as a blow to an ardent fan of Harry Potter series and Rowling's work. The average story is made even worse by David Yates by his sloppy excuse of a direction. Eddie Redmayne as an eccentric magizoologist is fine and so is Colinthis comes as a blow to an ardent fan of Harry Potter series and Rowling's work. The average story is made even worse by David Yates by his sloppy excuse of a direction. Eddie Redmayne as an eccentric magizoologist is fine and so is Colin Farrel, but the major disappointment is Katherine Waerston. She dilutes the whole energy of the movie. The movie depends heavily on the special effects but evryone who know Rowling knows the power of her story telling which blends perfectly with the magic surrounding the wizard world. Sadly, the movie has all show and no soul.… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

4

jakem1000Nov 27, 2016

As a fan of the original HP books and movies, this was a huge disappointment. The characters are two-dimensional, the story is both contrived and bizarre. This film is basically an excuse for Warner Bros to make two hours of CGI madnessAs a fan of the original HP books and movies, this was a huge disappointment. The characters are two-dimensional, the story is both contrived and bizarre. This film is basically an excuse for Warner Bros to make two hours of CGI madness (think Michael Bay meets Harry Potter), and make a guaranteed profit. It had potential, but it didn't meet it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

SquaredRenAug 19, 2017

This movie serves as an expanded universe to Harry Potter, and it kinda works for the fans I guess. The main character has this weird movement with his face that I didn't liked. The "pet friendly scenes" were stupid for me. Im not a hardcoreThis movie serves as an expanded universe to Harry Potter, and it kinda works for the fans I guess. The main character has this weird movement with his face that I didn't liked. The "pet friendly scenes" were stupid for me. Im not a hardcore Harry Potter fan, but this film was not needed. Overall, not good.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

3

Lambo442Mar 24, 2022

It looks and feels like a Harry Potter film but it's slow, lacks plot and the script is bad. Too many characters, too much hapenning with no focus or cohesion. Lots of it doesn't make sense either.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

JeanDuchampJan 10, 2018

A total disaster! Done as a spin-off of a successful franchise for exclusively commercial purposes, this film could at least contain a tiny bit of something, except the worn-out clichés and a set of annoying CGI that lacks even a shadow of aA total disaster! Done as a spin-off of a successful franchise for exclusively commercial purposes, this film could at least contain a tiny bit of something, except the worn-out clichés and a set of annoying CGI that lacks even a shadow of a shadow of imagination... But no, it doesn't! Too dull and mournful for a child, it's absolutely shallow and rudimentary for an adult! An absolute waste of money, time, energy, celluloid, fabrics, wooden sticks, lipsticks, whatever... The bright side of it - yes, I still know a couple of movies even worse than this one.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

ImpeccableTasteJan 3, 2017

BORING! CGI is really fake looking, and story is just flat. New York looks really depressing, and dark all the time. Redmayne has become addicted to playing his characters on the autism spectrum in my opinion.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

3

AquaMorphNov 26, 2016

This movie was par for the course for 2016 blockbuster films. Featuring poor writing and forgettable characters and villains. This movie does manage to be funny at times which saves it from being a total disaster. It is full of every badThis movie was par for the course for 2016 blockbuster films. Featuring poor writing and forgettable characters and villains. This movie does manage to be funny at times which saves it from being a total disaster. It is full of every bad directing habit of David Yates. The action sequences are boring and discombobulating. The story is all over the place and full of one denominational characters. JK Rowling's screenplay is no where near the level as her books. The cast is still good and tries to do there best with a terrible script and poor directing but that is unable to save the film.… Expand

3 of 8 users found this helpful35

All this user's reviews

3

FikashNov 21, 2016

As a fan of the series, I have to say that this movie was a huge disappointment. It is a huge bore. Eddie Redmayne as the lead was charmless and dull, and had seemingly no actual motivation throughout the whole film. His sidekick no-maj wasAs a fan of the series, I have to say that this movie was a huge disappointment. It is a huge bore. Eddie Redmayne as the lead was charmless and dull, and had seemingly no actual motivation throughout the whole film. His sidekick no-maj was just as uninteresting and seemed to be pulled along for the adventure for no apparent reason. The female leads were vastly more charming and I would have preferred if the movies centered on them. The film meanders for a good hour before getting to the actual plot, which is thin and offers no stakes for the characters we're meant to care about. The big "reveal" at the end was so obnoxious that it took everything I had to keep me from walking out of the theater. Just a very poorly-written film from start to finish. I'd wait for a rental on this one.… Expand

3 of 9 users found this helpful36

All this user's reviews

3

millionsknivesNov 23, 2016

With no direction, a focus on spells for the sake of showing CGI, a wealth of material that should have been left on the cutting room floor, and an impactless reveal — Fantastic Beasts is an aimless direction that can even bore a Harry Potter fan.

4 of 9 users found this helpful45

All this user's reviews

3

ourtimehascomeMar 31, 2017

The CGI creatures look like high school notebook rejects. With a lackluster plot and boring characters, even notable performers Eddie Redmayne and Colin Farrell look as though they've lost interest. This blatant, overwrought cash-grab isThe CGI creatures look like high school notebook rejects. With a lackluster plot and boring characters, even notable performers Eddie Redmayne and Colin Farrell look as though they've lost interest. This blatant, overwrought cash-grab is unsatisfying.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

rileyball2Dec 11, 2016

*in jk rowlings office* "I'm running out of money from writing all those harry potter books" Jk said, "I need to write a new book and get people to like me again" In walks one of her editors, "Ma'am you already released a book that you didn't*in jk rowlings office* "I'm running out of money from writing all those harry potter books" Jk said, "I need to write a new book and get people to like me again" In walks one of her editors, "Ma'am you already released a book that you didn't write but you did take credit for" "shoot i gotta do something different then how about a movie that is about a textbook from harry potter featuring characters not in harry potter and the only thing similar to harry potter are some key words." "ma'am thats brilliant i'll get the best writers on it."

This is what i imagine the creation of this movie was like. This cashgrab was a poorly produced/directed/written piece of garbage that i'm surprised anyone liked. Are you a fan of harry potter? well this movie says dumbledore and hogwarts so come buy a ticket? Did you only see the movies and haven't kept up with anything J.K has made canon? Good luck keeping up with this movie. I feel like i should've had to buy two tickets to see this as it feels like two completely different plot lines put together into one convuluted mess. I do not recommend you see this movie for any reason.… Expand

8 of 14 users found this helpful86

All this user's reviews

3

RicardobbtzMar 23, 2017

I started this movie somewhat happy to be back at Harry Potter's universe, but nothing felt the same. The plot is beyond bad, cheesy and forgettable. The main character, which I can't recall the name is a weird Stephen Hawking of EddieI started this movie somewhat happy to be back at Harry Potter's universe, but nothing felt the same. The plot is beyond bad, cheesy and forgettable. The main character, which I can't recall the name is a weird Stephen Hawking of Eddie Redmayne. That said, I was really confused about his Oscar award. It's not acting; he is this way and it doesn't add to the film. The CGI work is incredible, a bit overwhelming. A bunch of good actors misplaced with weird lines and a fast subplot that tried to be serious. People told me it's a children's movie. Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone was a children's movie, so to speak, and worked a hundred times better. It bugs me that this movie was done to throw the audience a vast universe of possibilities so I'm sure there will be others to come.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

fearti2Nov 21, 2017

I got the chance to watch Fantastic Beasts bla bla. the other day or should I say I was unfortunate to watch it. The movie is a forced and naff one that is made with commercial concerns. It is a mediocre movie that came out of neverendingI got the chance to watch Fantastic Beasts bla bla. the other day or should I say I was unfortunate to watch it. The movie is a forced and naff one that is made with commercial concerns. It is a mediocre movie that came out of neverending desire of money of J.K Rowling. While watching the movie, you feel that you are bored to the bone of the magical world of Rowling. Besides, it is a shame for Eddie Redmayne and Johnny Depp to be in this movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

FIlmlover100Dec 20, 2018

The movie had really good reviews on Netflix but eventually left me very disappointed. Nothing in the story made sense. Harry Potter movies had a clear story line and allowed you to discover a universe for itself while this story lacked logicThe movie had really good reviews on Netflix but eventually left me very disappointed. Nothing in the story made sense. Harry Potter movies had a clear story line and allowed you to discover a universe for itself while this story lacked logic and details. The guy comes out of nowhere by ship and disappears into nowhere. We don't learn anything about his past. We don't understand anything about his character. People stay anonymous throughout the movie so it is hard to bond with the characters after all....… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

3

NicholasmaximusApr 23, 2019

Lacked that magical feeling that one got from Harry Potter. The world was created and was good but then lost with movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

2

HfahmyJan 4, 2017

Absolute waste of time, no story to drive a scenario, and no scenario to drive acting. Full nonsense, as if magics movie is a permission for absurdity and out of context personalities and events. The only positive in this so called movie areAbsolute waste of time, no story to drive a scenario, and no scenario to drive acting. Full nonsense, as if magics movie is a permission for absurdity and out of context personalities and events. The only positive in this so called movie are the special effects, but that is not sufficient. If someone needs some sleep, he will be granted two hours but at a high ticket price.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

2

KleverViperDec 22, 2016

This film marks the first time I've ever been to see a film in the cinema and have wanted to leave. The film, despite many cool scenes is just boring. The main male characters are not likeable. It isn't 'fun' like the other Harry PotterThis film marks the first time I've ever been to see a film in the cinema and have wanted to leave. The film, despite many cool scenes is just boring. The main male characters are not likeable. It isn't 'fun' like the other Harry Potter films. Don't bother watching.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

2

varmadmcgooDec 23, 2016

Do you want to see inexplicable creatures floating around and destroying New York City, but you aren’t into superhero films like THE AVENGERS? Would you like to see the collective memory of that same city wiped clean of said incident, andDo you want to see inexplicable creatures floating around and destroying New York City, but you aren’t into superhero films like THE AVENGERS? Would you like to see the collective memory of that same city wiped clean of said incident, and were you born so late that you have no idea what MEN IN BLACK is about? Are you curious what a teen with an evil mother figure might do if bestowed with dangerous powers, but CARRIE and all the POLTERGEIST movies seem icky to you? Have you ever wanted to tame a dragon but decided that a movie called HOW TO TRAIN YOUR DRAGON was a little "on the nose"? Have you ever wanted to travel back in time to see a Carey Mulligan-type actress in a bob, but your parents told you that any adaptation of THE GREAT GATSBY with rap music must be of the devil? Have you yearned to watch an evil swarm of swarmy bee-like things swarm, but you decided STAR TREK BEYOND was too nerdy for you? Or quite simply did you ever wish that there were an incarnation of The Doctor from DOCTOR WHO that managed to never, ever look anyone (snakeypuffs and planticrawls excepted) in the eyes?

YES? To all of that? Then do we ever have the movie for you!

⁂ Fantastical Beasts is a meaningless amalgamation of clichés, borrowed scenes, ineffective attempts to tug at heartstrings, and shockingly bad (for 2016!) special effects. It’s a hammy trope-fest. While the female lead was endearingly played by Katherine Watterston, it wasn’t close to enough to make this film worthwhile. Yes, this is even true if one knows enough of the Potterverse to know who Grindlewald is, although apparently if a Potterhead is desperate enough, this film will taste like manna: Heavenly to the starved, and like generic, flavorless carbohydrates to the rest of us.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

1

marco34laNov 19, 2016

I'm sorry. Unless you're an avid fan of the books, you will find this movie on par with a g-rated idiotic movie made for 7 year old children. I loved Harry Potter. This movie was a total and complete snooze-fest for the first 60mins. It'sI'm sorry. Unless you're an avid fan of the books, you will find this movie on par with a g-rated idiotic movie made for 7 year old children. I loved Harry Potter. This movie was a total and complete snooze-fest for the first 60mins. It's just plain nonsense. I forced myself not to walk out. When I finally left, i saw that the 2 guys in their 20s sitting behind me were fast asleep.… Expand

5 of 21 users found this helpful516

All this user's reviews

1

AthanasiosTFeb 27, 2017

Some movies are made for children up to 10 years old. Clearly this is one of those. It has some nice visual effects, but apart from that, I just couldn't stay and watch it till the end.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them

User Reviews